Autumn 2018 Survey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Autumn 2018 Survey Halton HRA Bird Surveys on behalf of Halton Borough Council Non-Breeding Bird Surveys – Interim Report 1 September – mid-November 2018 Document Control Project Name: Halton HRA Bird Surveys Project Number: REF-Halto-536-1098 Report Title Non-Breeding Bird Surveys – Interim Report Issue Date Notes Prepared Reviewed V1 27/11/2018 Draft of Interim Report C Bonnington H Fearn for Client Approval BSc MSc DPhil MSc CIEEM MCIEEM This report has been prepared in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment for the Non-Breeding Bird Surveys [on request]. Avian Ecology Ltd. (6839201) cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 1 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 2 2.1 Project Background ............................................................................................ 2 2.2 Study Area Overview ......................................................................................... 2 3 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................. 4 3.1 Habitat Suitability Appraisal ............................................................................... 4 3.2 Non-Breeding Bird Surveys ................................................................................ 4 3.3 Limitations ......................................................................................................... 5 4 RESULTS ........................................................................................ 6 4.1 Habitat Suitability Appraisal ............................................................................... 6 4.2 Non-Breeding Bird Surveys ................................................................................ 7 5 DISCUSSION ................................................................................. 10 1 SUMMARY 1.1.1 This interim report summarises the results of the first period (autumn passage) of bird surveys carried out for Halton Borough Council, to provide an ornithological evidence base to allow the council to determine whether any local development plan will affect the integrity of European designated sites. 1.1.2 The council has identified some sites for allocations for potential future development. Of those sites identified, three are located in, and around, Hale village (termed the ‘Northern allocations’), and two, south-west of Halebank (termed the ‘Southern allocations’), to the north of the River Mersey. 1.1.3 The Mersey Estuary Special Protection Area (SPA)/ Ramsar is designated for a number of qualifying bird species, including some species which are alone qualifying species (e.g. golden plover and dunlin), and others which are part of a qualifying waterbird assemblage (e.g. curlew and lapwing). Habitats within 600m of the allocations were assessed for their suitability for supporting these qualifying bird features (termed ‘Target species’), and thus whether the fields were functionally linked to the SPA/ Ramsar. 1.1.4 The study area, which consisted of optimal habitats within 600m of the allocations, was subjected to Wetland Bird Counts (including one nocturnal count) and Targeted Vantage Point (VP) Surveys, carried out between September and mid-November 2018. 1.1.5 The preliminary results have found that in terms of the Northern allocations, field 24 (grazing marsh) supports >1% of the SPA qualifying population of golden plover and redshank. Furthermore, field 34 (arable, tilled land) also supports >1% of the SPA golden plover population. In terms of the Southern allocations, field 39 (grazing marsh) supports >1% of the SPA teal population. 1.1.6 Field 24 is buffered from the Northern allocations by woodland associated with Pickerings Pasture Local Nature Reserve and a water treatment plant, and field 39 is buffered from the Southern allocations by Hale village and the road network. There is also substantial spatial segregation between these fields and the allocations. Field 34 is however, adjacent to the Northern allocations. 1.1.7 It should also be noted that no evidence of usage by SPA associated bird species on any of the proposed allocation sites themselves was found. As such, any potentially adverse impacts on the Mersey SPA/Ramsar would be limited to disturbance of birds using land near to the allocation sites. 1.1.8 Subsequently, based on the findings to date, there is no clear evidence that inclusion of any of the currently proposed development sites within the Halton Delivery and Allocations Local Plan would lead to adverse effects on European site integrity. Halton HRA Bird Surveys Non-Breeding Bird Survey – Interim Report 1 1 2 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Project Background 2.1.1 Any plans or projects which may impact upon a European designated site (SPA/SAC) or Ramsar site are subject to Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) in accordance the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 (‘the Habitats Regulations’) and Articles 6(3) and 6(4) of the European Habitats Directive. 2.1.2 The HRA process requires competent authorities (in this case Halton Council; ‘HC’) to have adequate information so as to determine that any local development plan (or subsequent planning application submitted to them) will not affect the integrity of any European designated site or Ramsar site by compromising the conservation objectives of that site1. This includes possible impacts on nearby land outside the designated site boundary which is used by qualifying interest species in significant numbers. Such areas are referred to as ‘functionally linked’ land, and typically include farmland close to estuaries, such as that within Halton district around the River Mersey. Any plan or project which leads to adverse impact on the designated site integrity cannot lawfully proceed. It is therefore incumbent on HC to ensure the Halton Local Plan is in full accordance with the requirements of the Habitats Regulations whereby the integrity of the Mersey Estuary SPA/Ramsar will be fully maintained. 2.1.3 Avian Ecology was commissioned to provide an evidence base to assist in the formulation of future planning policy and site allocations within Halton. As such, the study will form part of the evidence base for the Halton Delivery and Allocations Local Plan. 2.1.4 This first interim report details the results of the autumn passage bird surveys. 2.2 Study Area Overview 2.2.1 In consultation with Natural England (NE), it is understood that HC has identified study areas within the Borough of Halton which may be allocated for future housing development and could, potentially, be considered as land which is functionally linked to the Mersey SPA. These are allocation sites H1, H2 and H3 located in Hale village, and W13 and W24 which are located to the south-west of Halebank. For the purpose of this interim report, these five allocation sites, and the fields within 600m of each site is considered as the study area. Fields which are only partly within the 600m buffer zone, are treated as within the study area. Figure 1 shows the location of the allocation sites with 600m buffer zone around each site. 2.2.2 For ease of analysis, and due to their close proximity, the following terms of reference are used: Southern Allocations, defined as allocation sites H1-H3 (and the buffer zones around these). Northern Allocations, defined as W13 and W24 (and buffer zones around these). 2.2.3 These two areas together constitute the study area. 2.2.4 The study area consists of fields which may support wetland birds. Part of the study area (within the buffer zone of the Northern allocations) includes estuary habitats within the Mersey SPA/Ramsar. Areas within the SPA/Ramsar are excluded as the objective of the study is to determine functional linkage only. Based on aerial maps, and subsequent ‘ground-truthing’ habitat appraisals, three other 1 Conservation Objectives are published by Natural England and provide a framework which should inform any ‘Habitats Regulations Assessments’. The Mersey Estuary SPA Conservation Objectives are available at: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/5790848037945344 Halton HRA Bird Surveys Non-Breeding Bird Survey – Interim Report 1 2 allocation sites; W47 (Halebank) and R12 and R58 (Runcorn), are considered unsuitable for wetland bird species, as these are either developed or provide sub-optimal habitat. This is further supported with reference to Review and analysis of changes in water-bird use of the Mersey Estuary SPA, Mersey Narrows & North Wirral Foreshore SPA and Ribble & Alt Estuaries SPA2, which indicates that no notable low and high tide waterbird assemblages are present on and surrounding these three allocation sites. These allocation sites are therefore not considered further in this interim report. 2 http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/4713137133584384 (accessed 28/11/2018) Halton HRA Bird Surveys Non-Breeding Bird Survey – Interim Report 1 3 3 METHODOLOGY 3.1 Habitat Suitability Appraisal 3.1.1 All fields within 600m of the allocation sites were subject to a refined Phase 1 habitat (walk-over) survey following the UK industry standard Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) Phase 1 Habitat Methodology (Joint Nature Conservation Commitee, 20103). For each field, the habitats were marked using standard Phase I habitat codes, with further information on the suitability, or otherwise, for wetland
Recommended publications
  • The Park Keeper
    The Park Keeper 1 ‘Most of us remember the park keeper of the past. More often than not a man, uniformed, close to retirement age, and – in the mind’s eye at least – carrying a pointed stick for collecting litter. It is almost impossible to find such an individual ...over the last twenty years or so, these individuals have disappeared from our parks and in many circumstances their role has not been replaced.’ [Nick Burton1] CONTENTS training as key factors in any parks rebirth. Despite a consensus that the old-fashioned park keeper and his Overview 2 authoritarian ‘keep off the grass’ image were out of place A note on nomenclature 4 in the 21st century, the matter of his disappearance crept back constantly in discussions.The press have published The work of the park keeper 5 articles4, 5, 6 highlighting the need for safer public open Park keepers and gardening skills 6 spaces, and in particular for a rebirth of the park keeper’s role. The provision of park-keeping services 7 English Heritage, as the government’s advisor on the Uniforms 8 historic environment, has joined forces with other agencies Wages and status 9 to research the skills shortage in public parks.These efforts Staffing levels at London parks 10 have contributed to the government’s ‘Cleaner, Safer, Greener’ agenda,7 with its emphasis on tackling crime and The park keeper and the community 12 safety, vandalism and graffiti, litter, dog fouling and related issues, and on broader targets such as the enhancement of children’s access to culture and sport in our parks The demise of the park keeper 13 and green spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Tuesday Volume 623 21 March 2017 No. 128 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 21 March 2017 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2017 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 753 21 MARCH 2017 754 Mr Hunt: The one simple thing the Government are House of Commons not going to do is refuse to listen to what the British people said when they voted on 23 June. We will do what they said—it is the right thing to do. However, the Tuesday 21 March 2017 right hon. Gentleman is absolutely right to highlight the vital role that the around 10,000 EU doctors in the The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock NHS play in this country. I can reassure him that the number of doctors joining the NHS from the EU was higher in the four months following the referendum PRAYERS result than in the same four months the previous year. 23. [909376] Helen Whately (Faversham and Mid Kent) [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] (Con): Does my right hon. Friend agree that Kent, with its excellent academic institutions and strong life sciences sector, would be an ideal location for a new medical school, and will he support emerging plans to Oral Answers to Questions establish one? Mr Hunt: I can absolutely confirm that the garden of England would be an ideal place for a new medical HEALTH school—alongside many other parts of the country that are actively competing to start medical schools as a The Secretary of State was asked— result of the expansion in doctor numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing Your Consultation Report: Practical Guidance
    Writing your consultation report: practical guidance The purpose of a consultation report is to show how you actively engaged with relevant groups and stakeholders in your local community, what feedback they provided on your proposal to establish a Free School, and how you intend to respond to their feedback. A typically good consultation report would normally include: 1. An executive summary highlighting the main findings of your consultation · Provide a brief, high-level summary of responses to your consultation questionnaire and any other feedback (e.g. letters, emails, meetings), outlining the main positive and negative points that emerged. 2. An outline and timeline of the consultation process · Indicate how long the consultation process ran for and provide exact dates for when different types of consultations (questionnaires, meetings) were carried out; · Describe how you disseminated your consultation materials (questionnaires, leaflets, letters inviting responses, etc.). Include extracts in the main report and enclose full copies as appendices; · Describe any consultation events (public meetings, workshops, etc.) you held. Clearly indicate the nature of the events, where they took place, who attended, and what was discussed; · Briefly list the respondents and stakeholders (e.g. local schools, Local Authorities, parents, community groups and leaders, local residents, prospective students) who took part in your consultation process. As an appendix to your report, provide a complete list of the institutions, groups, and types of individuals (within the limits of confidentiality) you consulted; · Briefly describe how you envisage the consultation to progress after the publication of your first report. 3. A summary of responses to your consultation questionnaires · Specify how many people responded in a certain way to a particular question.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Executive Board, 17/10/2019 14:00
    Public Document Pack Executive Board Thursday, 17 October 2019 2.00 p.m. The Boardroom, Municipal Building Chief Executive ITEMS TO BE DEALT WITH IN THE PRESENCE OF THE PRESS AND PUBLIC PART 1 Item Page No 1. MINUTES 2. DECLARATION OF INTEREST Members are reminded of their responsibility to declare any Disclosable Pecuniary Interest or Other Disclosable Interest which they have in any item of business on the agenda, no later than when that item is reached or as soon as the interest becomes apparent and, with Disclosable Pecuniary interests, to leave the meeting during any discussion or voting on the item. 3. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT PORTFOLIO (A) HALTON HOUSING TRUST - ANNUAL REPORT 1 - 21 (B) PRACTICALITIES OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF 22 - 31 THE COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY (CIL). Please contact Angela Scott on 0151 511 8670 or [email protected] for further information. The next meeting of the Committee is on Thursday, 14 November 2019 Item Page No (C) LIVERPOOL CITY REGION SPATIAL PLANNING 32 - 89 STATEMENT OF COMMON GROUND 4. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PORTFOLIO (A) SCRUTINY TOPIC GROUP - "BETTER JOBS TO 90 - 104 MAKE BETTER LIVES" 5. CHILDREN, EDUCATION AND SOCIAL CARE PORTFOLIO (A) HALTON STANDING ADVISORY COUNCIL FOR 105 - 108 RELIGIOUS EDUCATION (SACRE) CONSTITUTION (B) HALTON BOROUGH COUNCIL AND NHS HALTON 109 - 111 CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP: JOINT WORKING AGREEMENT 6. HEALTH AND WELLBEING PORTFOLIO (A) HEALTHY WEIGHT STRATEGY -A WHOLE 112 - 138 SYSTEMS APPROACH 2019- 2025 - KEY DECISION 7. RESOURCES PORTFOLIO (A) DIRECTORATE PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW 139 - 204 REPORT In accordance with the Health and Safety at Work Act the Council is required to notify those attending meetings of the fire evacuation procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • NCE100-Gold-Book.Pdf
    Gold Book The stories behind the most innovative, impactful and inspirational civil engineering practices Contents 6 Overview How the NCE100 Companies of the Year were chosen 8 8 Staff feedback analysis Staff feedback was key to 0% 100% NCE100 award winner choices 57% 11 NCE100 Very Satisfied Top10 The 10 best NCE100 companies in 2018 20 Trending 20 The top 20 up and coming civil engineering firms 22 Trending 20 winner FJD Consulting stood out 93% among the up and comers Satisfied 25 NCE100 winners The 15 greatest stories of 2017 56 NCE100 22 16 listing The NCE100 Companies of the Year 58 NCE100 Judges The 45 judges who assessed the NCE100 firms NCE100 GOLD BOOK 2018 3 EUROPE’S LEADING MULTI-DISCIPLINARY ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENT & DESIGN CONSULTANCY WE BELIEVE IN THE POSITIVE POWER OF HUMAN CURIOSITY & THE POSSIBILITIES IN TECHNOLOGY, INNOVATION & DESIGN As Europe’s leading consultancy for future communities and cities, Sweco is delighted to be ranked by the NCE as the 6th civil engineering company in the UK and proud to be the recipient of its Low Carbon Leader Award. [email protected] | 0113 262 0000 | www.sweco.co.uk Foreword Welcome to the NCE100 Gold Book. Inside we are recognising some fantastic civil engineering businesses. The companies inside are the most innovative, impactful and inspirational companies operating in the infrastructure sector today. We know this because the NCE100 is the most rigorous and robustly-judged business recognition scheme in civil engineering. To achieve recognition here, firms have had to present their achievements to a panel of 45 judges representing the industry’s leading clients, owner/operators stakeholder groups and change bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Annual Report and Accounts 2017 / 18
    WARRINGTON & HALTON HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS 2017/18 Page 1 of 284 Page 2 of 284 Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Annual Report and Accounts 2017 / 18 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 7, Paragraph 25(4)(a) of the National Health Service Act 2006 Page 3 of 284 © 2018 Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Page 4 of 284 ANNUAL REPORT 2017-18 Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust's Annual Report for the period 1st April 2017 to 31st March 2018 Table of Contents Page # 1. Performance Report - Performance overview 6 - Performance analysis 17 2. Accountability Report - Directors’ report 25 - The Board of Directors 26 - Remuneration report 36 - Council of Governors 48 - Membership 53 - Staff report 54 - Disclosures set out in the NHS FT Code of Governance 64 - The Accounting Officer’s responsibilities 71 - Annual Governance Statement 72 3. Quality Report 86 4. The Auditor’s Report including certificate 215 5. Foreword to the Accounts 222 Primary Financial Statements 223 Auditors Opinion on Financial Statements 274 CHAPTER 1 Performance Report Overview I present our Annual Report for the 2017-18 year We have pushed forward with our investment in which has been one of the most challenging to technology and the Trust Board approved the date. funding to add an Electronic Medicines Prescribing module to our electronic patient record system. I begin by paying tribute to the compassion, This has significant patient safety benefits which determination and sheer resilience of our will continue after the patient has left our care wonderful staff who, in the face of unprecedented when we join PharmOutcomes, a system that challenge, have continued to work so hard to enables our Pharmacy to inform community deliver the very best care for our patients.
    [Show full text]
  • INSPECTION REPORT WADE DEACON HIGH SCHOOL Widnes
    INSPECTION REPORT WADE DEACON HIGH SCHOOL Widnes LEA area: Halton Unique reference number: 111435 Headteacher: Mr Peter Barry Reporting inspector: Sue Kearney 18006 Dates of inspection: 8 - 11 May 2001 Inspection number: 189183 Inspection carried out under Section 10 of the School Inspections Act 1996 © Crown copyright 2000 This report may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that all extracts quoted are reproduced verbatim without adaptation and on condition that the source and date thereof are stated. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the School Inspections Act 1996, the school must provide a copy of this report and/or its summary free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL Type of school: Comprehensive School category: Community Age range of pupils: 11-16 Gender of pupils: Mixed School address: Birchfield Road Widnes Cheshire Postcode: WA8 7TD Telephone number: 0151 423 2721 Fax number: 0151 420 5789 Appropriate authority: The governing body Name of chair of governors: Mr John Woodroofe Date of previous inspection: September 1996 Wade Deacon High School i INFORMATION ABOUT THE INSPECTION TEAM 18006 S Kearney Registered inspector 9883 B Silvester Lay inspector 11508 C Griffin Team inspector 27719 P Metcalf Team inspector 18447 R Cohen Team inspector The inspection contractor was: Westminster Education Consultants Old Garden House The Lanterns Bridge Lane London SW11 3AD Any concerns or complaints about the inspection or the report should be raised with the inspection contractor.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions Tabled on Wed 1 Jul 2020
    Published: Thursday 2 July 2020 Questions tabled on Wednesday 1 July 2020 Includes questions tabled on earlier days which have been transferred. T Indicates a topical oral question. Members are selected by ballot to ask a Topical Question. † Indicates a Question not included in the random selection process but accepted because the quota for that day had not been filled. N Indicates a question for written answer on a named day under S.O. No. 22(4). [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. Questions for Answer on Thursday 2 July Questions for Written Answer 1 Jonathan Gullis (Stoke-on-Trent North): To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what recent assessment he has made of the effect of the covid-19 outbreak on the delivery of the Youth Fund. [Transferred] (66997) 2 N Tracy Brabin (Batley and Spen): To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what guidance the Government plans to provide for (a) singing and (b) wind instrument teachers to enable them to safely return to work as covid-19 lockdown restrictions are eased. [Transferred] (66156) 3 Andrew Rosindell (Romford): To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to allow the reopening of day centres for people with special educational needs. [Transferred] (66824) 4 Mr Virendra Sharma (Ealing, Southall): To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to ensure the adequate capacity of mental health services in schools for the start of the next academic year.
    [Show full text]
  • NHS Halton Clinical Commissioning Group Annual Report 2018/2019
    NHS Halton Clinical Commissioning Group Annual Report 2018/2019 1 CONTENT PERFORMANCE REPORT 3 Performance overview 4 Performance analysis 22 ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 74 Corporate Governance Report 74 Members Report 75 Statement of Accountable Officer’s Responsibilities 82 Governance Statement 84 Remuneration and Staff Report 130 Remuneration Report 130 Staff Report 138 Parliamentary Accountability and Audit Report 147 EXTERNAL AUDITORS OPINION 148 ANNUAL ACCOUNTS 153 2 PERFORMANCE REPORT Andrew Davies Accountable Officer 28th May 2019 3 Performance overview The purpose of this overview is to give readers information about who we are, what we do, our achievements this financial year and how well we’ve performed as well as our key risks and how we manage them: Welcome to our Annual Report for the year 2018/2019. The purpose of this Annual Report is to share with stakeholders how the organisation has discharged its functions in the financial year 2018/2019. The report includes several key statements supporting the financial year-end reporting and the annual accounting requirements for the whole of the NHS and is subject to audit review. Our financial accounts, which form part of this submission, have been prepared in accordance with the going concern principle as part of International Financial Reporting Standards. The Governance Statement included in this report sets out how we identify, manage and control risks such as assuring business continuity. The past year has been incredibly busy, with several changes and challenges in addition to some significant things that we should be proud of and celebrate which we do so throughout this report. This year has also been one of change.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the Borough in Halton
    The State of the Borough in Halton An Economic, Social and Environmental Audit of Halton January 2009 Most of the data in this report reflects the situation before the economic downturn as it is a snapshot of the latest data available. Data is constantly being updated on the Halton Observatory website: http://halton.localknowledge.co.uk/ and on the Research & Intelligence website: www.halton.gov.uk/research Key messages State of the Borough January 2009 update This is an update of the January 2008 report. All the tables within the report have been updated, however as there has only been a year between the two reports the data will not have changed significantly and many of the messages remain the same. The larger changes have been highlighted below: • Unemployment rate has risen to 3.6% (Oct 2008) from 2.9% (Oct 2007), however the long term unemployed rate has decreased to 10.4% from 11.3%, table 7: labour market. • Offences per 1,000 population has increased since the last report to 63.7 (2007-2008) from 41.7(2006-2007). Halton’s total crime score has increased with its ranking moving from 79 to 65 nationally, table 16: crime. • Halton’s commercial and industrial floorspace rank has fallen since the last report. Currently Halton is ranked 50 out of 375 (2007) compared to a rank of 22 (2006) in the last report, table 18: commercial and industrial property. • Halton’s local amenities rank has improved since the last report where it had a rank of 219 out of 376 (2007).
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Government Finance Report (England) 2009/2010
    Department for Communities and Local Government Local Government Finance (England) The Local Government Finance Report (England) 2009/2010 HC 150 LONDON: The Stationery Office £15.50 Department for Communities and Local Government Local Government Finance (England) The Local Government Finance Report (England) 2009/2010 Report by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government under section 78A of the Local Government Finance Act 1988 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed on 21 January 2009 HC 150 LONDON: The Stationery Office £15.50 © Crown Copyright 2009 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please write to Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 9780102958492 Contents Contents Section 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................3 2 Revenue Support Grant...........................................................................................................4 3 The Distributable Amount.......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • 2.0 EXISTING SITE DESCRIPTION Parts by Galigu Deposits
    Westlink Group Limited Environmental Statement – High Bay Regional Distribution Centre: Existing Site Description AOD. It is noted that the Foundry and West Bank Dock parts of the site have also been built up in 2.0 EXISTING SITE DESCRIPTION parts by galigu deposits. 2.1 INTRODUCTION The West Bank Dock Estate slopes from west to east with a maximum elevation of 15.7m AOD in the south west corner falling to 8.68m at the east at the junction with Mathieson Road. The site is located approximately 1km south west of Widnes town centre, Cheshire at an The site’s setting can best be characterised as a mixture of heavy and light industrial land uses, approximate National Grid Reference (NGR) of SJ 503 844 and is located on the north bank of but it is recognised that there are potentially sensitive residential areas and habitat sites in the the River Mersey approximately 1km downstream of the Widnes-Runcorn road bridge (see locality that need to be taken into account in the assessment and implementation of the Figure 1.1, Section 1). The site is set in a predominantly industrial area bounded by Desoto Road development. The existing site layout plan is presented in at the rear of this section. to the east and Hale Road to the west. To the north the development area is bounded by the A562 arterial route and mainline railway. The findings of the planning and land use history review (from historical maps) for the various sections of land comprising the site are summarised below and discussed in greater detail in The proposed development area is a little over 42 hectares (approximately 101 acres) and Sections 5, 6 and 14.
    [Show full text]