Queensland Clinical Guideline – Syphilis in Pregnancy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Queensland Clinical Guideline – Syphilis in Pregnancy Queensland Health Clinical Excellence Queensland Maternity and Neonatal Clinical Guideline Syphilis in pregnancy Queensland Clinical Guideline: Syphilis in pregnancy Document title: Syphilis in pregnancy Publication date: December 2018 Document number: MN18.44-V4-R23 The document supplement is integral to and should be read in conjunction with Document supplement: this guideline. Amendments: Full version history is supplied in the document supplement. Amendment date: June 2021 Replaces document: MN18.44-V3-R23 Author: Queensland Clinical Guidelines Health professionals in Queensland public and private maternity and neonatal Audience: services Review date: December 2023 Queensland Clinical Guidelines Steering Committee Endorsed by: Statewide Maternity and Neonatal Clinical Network (Queensland) Email: [email protected] Contact: URL: www.health.qld.gov.au/qcg Cultural acknowledgement We acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of the land on which we work and pay our respect to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Elders past, present and emerging. Disclaimer This guideline is intended as a guide and provided for information purposes only. The information has been prepared using a multidisciplinary approach with reference to the best information and evidence available at the time of preparation. No assurance is given that the information is entirely complete, current, or accurate in every respect. The guideline is not a substitute for clinical judgement, knowledge and expertise, or medical advice. Variation from the guideline, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate. This guideline does not address all elements of standard practice and accepts that individual clinicians are responsible for: • Providing care within the context of locally available resources, expertise, and scope of practice • Supporting consumer rights and informed decision making, including the right to decline intervention or ongoing management • Advising consumers of their choices in an environment that is culturally appropriate and which enables comfortable and confidential discussion. This includes the use of interpreter services where necessary • Ensuring informed consent is obtained prior to delivering care • Meeting all legislative requirements and professional standards • Applying standard precautions, and additional precautions as necessary, when delivering care • Documenting all care in accordance with mandatory and local requirements Queensland Health disclaims, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and all liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages and costs incurred for any reason associated with the use of this guideline, including the materials within or referred to throughout this document being in any way inaccurate, out of context, incomplete or unavailable. Recommended citation: Queensland Clinical Guidelines. Syphilis in pregnancy. Guideline No. MN18.44- V4-R23. Queensland Health. 2018. Available from: http://www.health.qld.gov.au/qcg © State of Queensland (Queensland Health) 2021 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives V4.0 International licence. In essence, you are free to copy and communicate the work in its current form for non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute Queensland Clinical Guidelines, Queensland Health and abide by the licence terms. You may not alter or adapt the work in any way. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en For further information, contact Queensland Clinical Guidelines, RBWH Post Office, Herston Qld 4029, email [email protected]. For permissions beyond the scope of this licence, contact: Intellectual Property Officer, Queensland Health, GPO Box 48, Brisbane Qld 4001, email [email protected] phone (07) 3234 1479. Refer to online version, destroy printed copies after use Page 2 of 31 Queensland Clinical Guideline: Syphilis in pregnancy Flow Chart: Antenatal care Syphilis Risk assess all women No serology Universal risk reactive? • All pregnant women Increased risk Yes • Woman or her partner identify as Aboriginal Discuss case with QSSS and expert and/or Torres Strait Islander practitioner • Adolescent pregnancy Assessment • STI in current pregnancy or last 12 months • Obstetric history • Ongoing sexual links in high prevalence • Sexual history countries (woman or partner) • Previous diagnosis of syphilis High risk • History of previous treatment • Sexual contact with infectious syphilis case • Symptoms of syphilis • Woman or partner identify as Aboriginal • Clinical examination and/or Torres Strait Islander AND reside in o PCR swab of lesions an outbreak declared area • Substance use – particularly methamphetamine (‘ice’) • Woman’s partner is MSM • Late, limited or no antenatal care Treatment • Engages in high risk sexual activity required? No Yes Antenatal screening Develop and document plan of care with QSSS and expert practitioner to: All pregnant women • Serology at first antenatal visit (preferably • Identify treatment appropriate for stage of < 10 weeks gestation) syphilis and history • Dry swab (PCR) if lesions/chancre present • Facilitate contact tracing/treatment • Repeat if change in risk status • Promote maternal and neonatal serological follow-up If increased risk • Monitor effect of maternal treatment • Repeat serology at 26–28 weeks gestation Treatment If high risk • Infectious syphilis • Repeat serology at: o Benzathine penicillin 1.8 g (2.4 million o Around 20 weeks gestation units) IM once (opportunistically between 16–24 weeks) • Late latent or unknown duration 26–28 weeks gestation o o Benzathine penicillin 1.8 g (2.4 million o 34–36 weeks gestation units) IM weekly for three weeks* Test at birth if (any of the following) o Optimal interval is one dose every 7 days* • Woman is high risk If penicillin allergy • Woman is increased risk AND: • Seek expert advice o No serology after 26 weeks Ongoing antenatal care o Preterm birth with most recent serology > 4 weeks before birth • Retest as per high risk women • Indicated following risk assessment • Perinatal assessment as indicated • Discuss: o Risk of reinfection and prevention * If dose is missed or there is an interval of greater Symptoms of syphilis than 7 days considering restarting entire course in o consultation with an expert practitioner o Importance of follow-up • At birth, syphilis serology, placental histopathology and PCR Expert practitioner: clinician with specialist knowledge and experience in the testing, result interpretation, management and treatment of syphilis in the pregnant woman and/or her baby Routine care IM: intramuscular injection, MSM: Men who have sex with men, PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction QSSS: Queensland Syphilis Surveillance Service, STI: sexually transmitted infection, <: less than ≤ less than or equal to Queensland Clinical Guidelines: Syphilis in pregnancy. Flowchart version: F18.44.1-V3-R23 Refer to online version, destroy printed copies after use Page 3 of 31 Queensland Clinical Guideline: Syphilis in pregnancy Flow Chart: Baby care At risk baby • Mother had syphilis requiring treatment in this pregnancy (irrespective of *adequacy Plan and document all care, investigations and treatment in conjunction with an of treatment) AND/OR expert practitioner • Baby with clinical suspicion of syphilis: o Rash, hepatomegaly, rhinitis, lymphadenopathy and/or other signs and Additional investigations symptoms Consider • FBC, ELFT • Initial assessments Chest x-ray • If *inadequate maternal treatment, or • Long bone radiographs suspicion of syphilis • CSF • Neuroimaging o Treat (do not wait for results) • Perform all of the following: • Ophthalmologic exam • Auditory brain stem response o Parallel ‘syphilis serology’ testing of mother’s and baby’s serum (a non- treponemal titre that is four-fold the Treatment for congenital syphilis maternal titre is diagnostic of CS) 0–7 days of age o IgM of baby’s serum (positive IgM • Benzyl penicillin 30 mg/kg IV 12 hourly for strongly indicative of CS) 10 days Clinical examination of the baby o 8–30 days of age o Placental histopathology and PCR • Benzyl penicillin 30 mg/kg IV 8 hourly for o Review *adequacy of maternal treatment 10 days > 30 days of age • Benzyl penicillin 30 mg/kg IV 4–6 hourly for All initial No 10 days assessments normal? Follow-up Yes Communication • Document need for follow-up • Communication Advise local services of follow-up needs • Document need for follow-up Clinical assessment • Advise local services of follow-up needs • At each opportunity Follow-up Serology • Clinical assessment at each opportunity • At 3, 6 and 12 months of age • Serology at 3 and 6 months of age o If follow-up difficult, aim for 2 tests by 6 o If possible co-ordinate with other health months of age (> 4 weeks apart) check opportunities • If serology persistently reactive at 12 o If follow-up difficult, aim for 2 tests by 6 months seek advice from expert months of age, (> 4 weeks apart) practitioner • If serology remains non-reactive, no further • If at birth CNS or CSF abnormal, repeat action CSF at 6 months for VDRL, cell count and protein Precautionary single dose at discharge *Adequate treatment: treatment may be considered • Expert practitioner may consider single adequate if a stage-appropriate penicillin regimen was precautionary dose of antibiotic if completed 30 days or more prior to birth and all serological follow-up is uncertain
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Streptococcal and Staphylococcal Exotoxins and Proteases in Human Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections
    toxins Review The Role of Streptococcal and Staphylococcal Exotoxins and Proteases in Human Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections Patience Shumba 1, Srikanth Mairpady Shambat 2 and Nikolai Siemens 1,* 1 Center for Functional Genomics of Microbes, Department of Molecular Genetics and Infection Biology, University of Greifswald, D-17489 Greifswald, Germany; [email protected] 2 Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-3834-420-5711 Received: 20 May 2019; Accepted: 10 June 2019; Published: 11 June 2019 Abstract: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are critical clinical conditions characterized by extensive necrosis of any layer of the soft tissue and systemic toxicity. Group A streptococci (GAS) and Staphylococcus aureus are two major pathogens associated with monomicrobial NSTIs. In the tissue environment, both Gram-positive bacteria secrete a variety of molecules, including pore-forming exotoxins, superantigens, and proteases with cytolytic and immunomodulatory functions. The present review summarizes the current knowledge about streptococcal and staphylococcal toxins in NSTIs with a special focus on their contribution to disease progression, tissue pathology, and immune evasion strategies. Keywords: Streptococcus pyogenes; group A streptococcus; Staphylococcus aureus; skin infections; necrotizing soft tissue infections; pore-forming toxins; superantigens; immunomodulatory proteases; immune responses Key Contribution: Group A streptococcal and Staphylococcus aureus toxins manipulate host physiological and immunological responses to promote disease severity and progression. 1. Introduction Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are rare and represent a more severe rapidly progressing form of soft tissue infections that account for significant morbidity and mortality [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Scarlet Fever Fact Sheet
    Scarlet Fever Fact Sheet Scarlet fever is a rash illness caused by a bacterium called Group A Streptococcus (GAS) The disease most commonly occurs with GAS pharyngitis (“strep throat”) [See also Strep Throat fact sheet]. Scarlet fever can occur at any age, but it is most frequent among school-aged children. Symptoms usually start 1 to 5 days after exposure and include: . Sandpaper-like rash, most often on the neck, chest, elbows, and on inner surfaces of the thighs . High fever . Sore throat . Red tongue . Tender and swollen neck glands . Sometimes nausea and vomiting Scarlet fever is usually spread from person to person by direct contact The strep bacterium is found in the nose and/or throat of persons with strep throat, and can be spread to the next person through the air with sneezing or coughing. People with scarlet fever can spread the disease to others until 24 hours after treatment. Treatment of scarlet fever is important Persons with scarlet fever can be treated with antibiotics. Treatment is important to prevent serious complications such as rheumatic fever and kidney disease. Infected children should be excluded from child care or school until 24 hours after starting treatment. Scarlet fever and strep throat can be prevented . Cover the mouth when coughing or sneezing. Wash hands after wiping or blowing nose, coughing, and sneezing. Wash hands before preparing food. See your doctor if you or your child have symptoms of scarlet fever. Maryland Department of Health Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Outbreak Response Bureau Prevention and Health Promotion Administration Web: http://health.maryland.gov February 2013 .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 – PROKARYOTES: Survey of the Bacteria & Archaea
    Chapter 11 – PROKARYOTES: Survey of the Bacteria & Archaea 1. The Bacteria 2. The Archaea Important Metabolic Terms Oxygen tolerance/usage: aerobic – requires or can use oxygen (O2) anaerobic – does not require or cannot tolerate O2 Energy usage: autotroph – uses CO2 as a carbon source • photoautotroph – uses light as an energy source • chemoautotroph – gets energy from inorganic mol. heterotroph – requires an organic carbon source • chemoheterotroph – gets energy & carbon from organic molecules …more Important Terms Facultative vs Obligate: facultative – “able to, but not requiring” e.g. • facultative anaerobes – can survive w/ or w/o O2 obligate – “absolutely requires” e.g. • obligate anaerobes – cannot tolerate O2 • obligate intracellular parasite – can only survive within a host cell The 2 Prokaryotic Domains Overview of the Bacterial Domain We will look at examples from several bacterial phyla grouped largely based on rRNA (ribotyping): Gram+ bacteria • Firmicutes (low G+C), Actinobacteria (high G+C) Proteobacteria (Gram- heterotrophs mainly) Gram- nonproteobacteria (photoautotrophs) Chlamydiae (no peptidoglycan in cell walls) Spirochaetes (coiled due to axial filaments) Bacteroides (mostly anaerobic) 1. The Gram+ Bacteria Gram+ Bacteria The Gram+ bacteria are found in 2 different phyla: Firmicutes • low G+C content (usually less than 50%) • many common pathogens Actinobacteria • high G+C content (greater than 50%) • characterized by branching filaments Firmicutes Characteristics associated with this phylum: • low G+C Gram+ bacteria
    [Show full text]
  • Streptococcus Pneumoniae Technical Sheet
    technical sheet Streptococcus pneumoniae Classification On necropsy, a serosanguineous to purulent exudate Alpha-hemolytic, Gram-positive, encapsulated, aerobic is often found in the nasal cavities and the tympanic diplococcus bullae. The lungs can have areas of firm, dark red consolidation. Fibrinopurulent pleuritis, pericarditis, Family and peritonitis are other changes seen on necropsy of animals affected by S. pneumoniae. Histologic Streptococcaceae lesions are consistent with necropsy findings, Affected species and bronchopneumonia of varying severity and fibrinopurulent serositis are often seen. Primarily described as a pathogen of rats and guinea pigs. Mice are susceptible to infection. Agent of human Diagnosis disease and human carriers are a likely source of An S. pneumoniae infection should be suspected if animal infections. Zoonotic infection is possible. encapsulated Gram-positive diplococci are seen on a smear from a lesion. Confirmation of the diagnosis is Frequency via culture of lesions or affected tissues. S. pneumoniae Rare in modern laboratory animal colonies. Prevalence grows best on 5% blood agar and is alpha-hemolytic. in pet and wild populations unknown. The organism is then presumptively identified with an optochin test. PCR assays are also available for Transmission diagnosis. PCR-based screening for S. pneumoniae Transmission is primarily via aerosol or contact with may be conducted on respiratory samples or feces. nasal or lacrimal secretions of an infected animal. S. PCR may also be useful for confirmation of presumptive pneumoniae may be cultured from the nasopharynx and microbiologic identification or confirming the identity of tympanic bullae. bacteria observed in histologic lesions. Clinical Signs and Lesions Interference with Research Inapparent infections and carrier states are common, Animals carrying S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Severe Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis in an Immunocompromised Pregnant Patient
    Elmer ress Case Report J Med Cases. 2015;6(6):282-284 A Case of Severe Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis in an Immunocompromised Pregnant Patient Marijo Aguileraa, c, Anne Marie Furusethb, Lauren Giacobbea, Katherine Jacobsa, Kirk Ramina Abstract festations include respiratory or neurologic involvement, acute renal failure, invasive opportunistic infections and a shock- Human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA) is a tick-borne disease that like illness [2-4]. Recent delineation of the various species can often result in persistent fevers and other non-specific symptoms associated with ehrlichia infections and an increased under- including myalgias, headache, and malaise. The incidence among en- standing of the epidemiology has augmented our knowledge of demic areas has been increasing, and clinician recognition of disease these tick-borne diseases. However, a detailed understanding symptoms has aided in the correct diagnosis and treatment of patients of HGA infections in both immunocompromised and pregnant who have been exposed. While there have been few cases reported of patients is limited. We report a case of a severe HGA infection HGA disease during pregnancy, all patients have undergone a rela- presenting as an acute exacerbation of Crohn’s disease in a tively mild disease course without complications. HGA may cause pregnant immunocompromised patient. more severe disease in the elderly and immunocompromised. Herein, we report an unusual presentation and severe disease complications of HGA in a pregnant female who was concomitantly immunocompro- Case Report mised due to azathioprine treatment of her Crohn’s disease. Follow- ing successful treatment with rifampin, she subsequently delivered a A 34-year-old primigravida at 17+2 weeks’ gestation presented healthy female infant without any disease sequelae.
    [Show full text]
  • Ehrlichia, and Anaplasma Species in Australian Human-Biting Ticks
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Bacterial Profiling Reveals Novel “Ca. Neoehrlichia”, Ehrlichia, and Anaplasma Species in Australian Human-Biting Ticks Alexander W. Gofton1*, Stephen Doggett2, Andrew Ratchford3, Charlotte L. Oskam1, Andrea Paparini1, Una Ryan1, Peter Irwin1* 1 Vector and Water-borne Pathogen Research Group, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 2 Department of Medical Entomology, Pathology West and Institute for Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 3 Emergency Department, Mona Vale Hospital, New South Wales, Australia * [email protected] (AWG); [email protected] (PI) Abstract OPEN ACCESS In Australia, a conclusive aetiology of Lyme disease-like illness in human patients remains Citation: Gofton AW, Doggett S, Ratchford A, Oskam elusive, despite growing numbers of people presenting with symptoms attributed to tick CL, Paparini A, Ryan U, et al. (2015) Bacterial bites. In the present study, we surveyed the microbial communities harboured by human-bit- Profiling Reveals Novel “Ca. Neoehrlichia”, Ehrlichia, ing ticks from across Australia to identify bacteria that may contribute to this syndrome. and Anaplasma Species in Australian Human-Biting Ticks. PLoS ONE 10(12): e0145449. doi:10.1371/ Universal PCR primers were used to amplify the V1-2 hyper-variable region of bacterial journal.pone.0145449 16S rRNA genes in DNA samples from individual Ixodes holocyclus (n = 279), Amblyomma Editor: Bradley S. Schneider, Metabiota, UNITED triguttatum (n = 167), Haemaphysalis bancrofti (n = 7), and H. longicornis (n = 7) ticks. STATES The 16S amplicons were sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform and analysed in Received: October 12, 2015 USEARCH, QIIME, and BLAST to assign genus and species-level taxonomies.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Diagnosis Between Streptococcus Agalactiae and Listeria Monocytogenes in the Clinical Laboratory
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE, Vol. 7, No. 3 Copyright © 1977, Institute for Clinical Science Differential Diagnosis between Streptococcus Agalactiae and Listeria Monocytogenes in the Clinical Laboratory CHRISTINE KONTNICK, M.T., ALEXANDER von GRAEVENITZ, M.D., and VINCENT PISCITELLI, M.T. Clinical Microbiology Laboratories, Yale-New Haven Hospital, and Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06504 ABSTRACT Streptococci of the group B (S. agalactiae) and Listeria monocytogenes resemble each other in many morphological and biochemical characteris­ tics. Ten beta-hemolytic strains of each species were subjected to 26 tests commonly and easily performed in the clinical laboratory. Macroscopic and microscopic morphology on solid media showed differences only in the size of the colonies and in the length of the individual organisms. Among many other tests, hippurate hydrolysis and the CAMP reaction were pos­ itive in both species. In the presence of these two reactions, a negative catalase test and chaining in broth would make a presumptive diagnosis of S. agalactiae, while motility at 25 C, the presence of the Henry effect, and resistance to furadantin would be indicative of L. monocytogenes. Introduction in Gram-stained smears; (3) a negative bacitracin test and (4) a positive test for The high incidence of Streptococcus either (a) hippurate hydrolysis, (b) the agalactiae (group B) in human speci­ CAMP reaction or (c) the formation of an mens, which has been recognized only in orange-red pigment. However, if one of the past decade, calls for a rapid pre­ these conditions for the diagnosis is not sumptive diagnosis of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Probable Cases of Infection with Treponema Pallidum During the Neolithic Period in Northern Vietnam (Ca
    Bioarchaeology International Volume 4, Number 1: 15–36 DOI: 10.5744/bi.2020.1000 Two Probable Cases of Infection with Treponema pallidum during the Neolithic Period in Northern Vietnam (ca. 2000– 1500 B.C.) Melandri Vlok,a* Marc Fredrick Oxenham,b,c Kate Domett,d Tran Thi Minh,e Nguyen Thi Mai Huong,e Hirofumi Matsumura,f Hiep Hoang Trinh,e Thomas Higham,g Charles Higham,h Nghia Truong Huu,e and Hallie Ruth Buckleya aDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand bSchool of Archaeology and Anthropology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia cSchool of Archaeology, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK dCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia eInstitute of Archaeology, Hanoi, Vietnam fSchool of Health Sciences, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan gOxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK hSchool of Social Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand *Correspondence to: Melandri Vlok, Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, 270 Great King Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand e- mail: Melandri . vlok@postgrad . otago . ac . nz This research was supported by a National Geographic Early Career Grant (EC- 54332R- 18), a Royal Society of New Zealand Skinner Fund Grant, and a University of Otago Doctoral Scholarship. ABSTRACT Skeletal evidence of two probable cases of treponematosis, caused by infection with the bacterium Trepo- nema pallidum, from the northern Vietnamese early Neolithic site of Man Bac (1906– 1523 cal B.C.) is de- scribed. The presence of nodes of subperiosteal new bone directly associated with superficial focal cavitations in a young adult male and a seven- year- old child are strongly diagnostic for treponemal disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Fulminant Gas Gangrene in an Adolescent with Immunodeficiency
    Rev. Fac. Med. 2016 Vol. 64 No. 3: 555-9 555 CASE REPORT DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v64n3.49794 Fulminant gas gangrene in an adolescent with immunodeficiency. Case report and literature review Gangrena gaseosa fulminante en adolescente con inmunodeficiencia. Reporte de caso y revisión de la literatura Received: 24/03/2015. Accepted: 01/05/2015. Edna Karina García1 • Pedro Alberto Sierra1, 2 • Omar Quintero-Guevara1, 2 • Lina Jaramillo3 1 Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Pediatrics - Bogotá, D.C. - Colombia. 2 Fundación Hospital de La Misericordia - Emergency Department - Bogotá, D.C. - Colombia. 3 Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Bogotá Campus - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Pathology - Bogotá, D.C. - Colombia. Corresponding author: Pedro Alberto Sierra. Department of Pediatrics - Faculty of Medicine - Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Carrera 30 No. 45-03. Phone number: +57 13373842. Bogotá, D.C. Colombia. Email: [email protected]. | Abstract | y revisión de literatura]. Rev. Fac. Med. 2016;64(3):555-9. English. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v64n3.49794. Immunity defects are important predisposing factors to aggressive infections with high risk of mortality. The case of a teenager with a history of immunodeficiency, who developed gas gangrene infection Introduction originated in the left lower limb is reported here. The disease progressed in less than 24 hours, developed systemic involvement and Gangrene means cell necrosis (1) and may be caused by various led to multiple organ failure and death. Pathophysiological aspects and microorganisms: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Estaphylococcus aureus, features of the agent are reviewed here, highlighting the importance of Streptococcus pyogenes (2), Clostridium spp and other anaerobic high index of clinical suspicion and immediate handling.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Infection with Streptococcus Pneumoniae and Listeria Monocytogenes in an Immunocompromised Patient
    This open-access article is distributed under Creative Commons licence CC-BY-NC 4.0. IN PRACTICE CASE REPORT Co-infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae and Listeria monocytogenes in an immunocompromised patient C J Opperman, MB ChB, BSc Hons (Microbiology); C Bamford, MB ChB, FCPath MMed Pathology (Microbiology) Division of Medical Microbiology, National Health Laboratory Service, University of Cape Town and Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa Corresponding author: C J Opperman ([email protected]) A 34-year-old HIV-positive man with a history of chronic substance abuse was admitted with dual infection of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Listeria monocytogenes. Combined bacteraemia with S. pneumoniae and L. monocytogenes is very rare. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such case documented at our institution and in South Africa. Ampicillin should be added to antibiotic regimens to improve patient outcome if L. monocytogenes infection is suspected. Co-infections that occur with L. monocytogenes may have conflicting antibiotic treatment options. This case report emphasises the need for a good relationship between the local microbiology pathologist and physician to select appropriate antibiotic treatment before definitive results are available. S Afr Med J 2018;108(5):386-388. DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.2018.v108i5.12957 In September 2017, the National Institute for Communicable Diseases imipenem by the attending clinicians owing to the severity of the (NICD) released a statement reporting an unprecedented increase in illness and apparent concern about Gram-negative infection. The the number of Listeria cases across South Africa (SA). The increase identification of both organisms was subsequently confirmed using was noted in the private and public sectors, with 190 confirmed routine laboratory methods (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • E P I C a S E C R I T E R I a Guide, 2014
    TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES Infectious Disease Control Unit E p i C a s e C r i t e r i a Guide, 2014 Revision: January 2014 Texas Department of State Health Services Epi Case Criteria Guide, 2014 Editor Nadia Bekka, M.Ed. Contributors Amy Littman Laura Tabony, MPH Bobbiejean Garcia, MPH, CIC Lesley Brannan, MPH Brandy Tidwell Maria G Rodriguez Dawn Hesalroad, M.Ed. Marilyn Felkner, DrPH Eric Fonken, DVM Michael Fischer, MD, MPH & TM Eric Garza, MPH Neil Pascoe, RN, BSN, CIC Gary Heseltine, MD, MPH Nicole Evert, MS Greg Leos, MPH, CPH Rachel Wiseman, MPH Inger-Marie Vilcins, MIPH, PhD Venessa Cantu, MPH Irina Cody, MPH Wendy Albers Kayla Boykins Texas Department of State Health Services Infectious Disease Control Unit Emerging and Acute Infectious Disease Branch // Zoonosis Control Branch Mailcode 1960 PO Box 149347 Austin, TX 78714-9347 Phone 512.776.7676 • Fax 512.776.7616 Revised: January 2014 Publication No. E59-11841 Revision: January 2014 ~ ii ~ REVISIONS MADE FROM THE 2013 TO THE 2014 EPI CASE CRITERIA GUIDE Diseases notifiable in 2014 (not notifiable in the 2013 guide) (Title 25, Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 97, Subchapter A, Control of Communicable Diseases): . Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae* . Multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter* *See Multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO). CRE and MDR-A reporting is covered and encouraged as a rare or exotic disease and will be specified by Texas Administrative Code (TAC) rule with an estimated effective date of April, 2014. Changes in nomenclature: . Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)..................................................TO................................................Novel Coronavirus Causing Severe Respiratory Disease Disease specific revisions: description of condition (DC), case criteria (C), laboratory confirmation tests (L) .
    [Show full text]
  • The Types and Proportions of Commensal Microbiota Have a Predictive Value in Coronary Heart Disease
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Review The Types and Proportions of Commensal Microbiota Have a Predictive Value in Coronary Heart Disease Lin Chen 1,2 , Tomoaki Ishigami 1,*, Hiroshi Doi 1, Kentaro Arakawa 1 and Kouichi Tamura 1 1 Department of Medical Science and Cardio-Renal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa 236-0027, Japan; [email protected] (L.C.); [email protected] (H.D.); [email protected] (K.A.); [email protected] (K.T.) 2 Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-45-787-2635 Abstract: Previous clinical studies have suggested that commensal microbiota play an important role in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; however, a synthetic analysis of coronary heart disease (CHD) has yet to be performed. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the specific types of commensal microbiota associated with CHD by performing a systematic review of prospective observational stud- ies that have assessed associations between commensal microbiota and CHD. Of the 544 published articles identified in the initial search, 16 publications with data from 16 cohort studies (2210 patients) were included in the analysis. The combined data showed that Bacteroides and Prevotella were commonly identified among nine articles (n = 13) in the fecal samples of patients with CHD, while seven articles commonly identified Firmicutes. Moreover, several types of commensal microbiota were common to atherosclerotic plaque and blood or gut samples in 16 cohort studies. For example, Citation: Chen, L.; Ishigami, T.; Doi, Veillonella, Proteobacteria, and Streptococcus were identified among the plaque and fecal samples, H.; Arakawa, K.; Tamura, K.
    [Show full text]