DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Acadian Redfish, Pollock and Haddock Otter Trawl Fishery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Acadian Redfish, Pollock and Haddock Otter Trawl Fishery MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.2 October 2020 8950 Martin Luther King Jr. Street N. #202 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2211 Tel: (727) 563-9070 Fax: (727) 563-0207 Email: [email protected] President: Andrew A. Rosenberg, Ph.D. U.S. Acadian Redfish, Pollock and Haddock Otter Trawl Fishery Announcement Comment Draft Report March 31st, 2021 Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) MRAG Americas, Inc. Amanda Stern-Pirlot (team leader), Erin Wilson, Giuseppe Scarcella, Blanka Assessment team Lederer Fishery client The Sustainable Groundfish Association, Inc. Assessment type Reassessment Date March 31st, 2020 1 MRAG Americas, Inc. US2749 US Acadian redfish, pollock and haddock fishery ACDR MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.2 October 2020 Document Control Record Document Draft Submitted By Date Reviewed By Date ACDR EW, ASP, GS, BL March 28, 2021 ASP March 30, 2021 2 MRAG Americas, Inc. US2749 US Acadian redfish, pollock and haddock fishery ACDR MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.2 October 2020 1 Contents 1 Contents .......................................................................................................... 3 2 Glossary .......................................................................................................... 5 3 Executive summary ......................................................................................... 7 4 Report details .................................................................................................. 8 4.1 Authorship and peer review details ......................................................................... 8 4.2 Version details .......................................................................................................9 5 Unit(s) of Assessment and Unit(s) of Certification and results overview ......... 9 5.1 Unit(s) of Assessment and Unit(s) of Certification ................................................... 9 5.1.1 Unit(s) of Assessment ................................................................................................. 9 5.1.2 Unit(s) of Certification ................................................................................................ 11 5.2 Assessment results overview ............................................................................... 12 5.2.1 Determination, formal conclusion and agreement ...................................................... 12 5.2.2 Principle level scores................................................................................................. 13 5.2.3 Summary of conditions .............................................................................................. 13 5.2.4 Recommendations .................................................................................................... 13 6 Traceability and eligibility .............................................................................. 14 6.1 Eligibility date ....................................................................................................... 14 6.2 Traceability within the fishery ............................................................................... 14 6.2.1 Introduction .................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 6.2.2 Traceability within the fishery........................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 6.2.3 Findings ....................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 6.3 Eligibility to enter further chains of custody ........................................................... 15 6.4 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to enter further chains of custody 15 7 Scoring .......................................................................................................... 16 7.1 Summary of Performance Indicator level scores ................................................... 16 7.2 Principle 1 ............................................................................................................ 17 7.2.1 Principle 1 background .............................................................................................. 17 Acadian Redfish (Sebastes fasciatus).................................................................................. 17 Pollock (Pollachius virens) ................................................................................................... 19 Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)................................................................................ 21 7.2.2 Fishery management................................................................................................. 26 7.2.3 Data collection Programme ....................................................................................... 28 7.2.4 Catch profiles ............................................................................................................ 30 7.2.5 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and catch data .............................................................. 30 7.2.6 Principle 1 Performance Indicator scores and rationales ............................................ 31 ........................................................................................................ 31 ................................................................................................... 35 .................................................................................................. 36 ............................................................................ 40 3 MRAG Americas, Inc. US2749 US Acadian redfish, pollock and haddock fishery ACDR MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.2 October 2020 .................................................................................. 43 ................................................................................. 45 7.3 Principle 2 .......................................................................................................... 48 7.3.1 Principle 2 background .............................................................................................. 48 7.3.2 Overview of Non-target Catch ................................................................................... 48 7.3.3 Overview of Habitats and Ecosystems ....................................................................... 58 7.3.4 Principle 2 Performance Indicator scores and rationales ..................................... 69 .................................................................................... 69 ................................................................................ 76 ..................................................................... 90 ...................................................................................... 94 ................................................................................................ 96 ............................................................................ 98 ........................................................................................... 100 .......................................................................................... 102 ...................................................................... 103 ...................................................................................... 105 Principle 3 ........................................................................................................................ 107 7.3.5 Area of operation .................................................................................................. 107 7.3.6 Jurisdiction .............................................................................................................. 107 7.3.7 Recognized groups with interests in the fishery and details of the fleet .................... 107 7.3.8 Legal and policy framework ..................................................................................... 108 7.3.9 Resolution of Disputes ............................................................................................ 110 7.3.10 Respect of Rights .................................................................................................... 111 7.3.11 Consultation, roles, and responsibilities ................................................................... 112 7.3.12 Decision making process......................................................................................... 114 7.3.13 Objectives for the Acadian redfish, haddock and pollock fishery .............................. 116 7.3.14 Regulatory framework and measures to meet objectives ......................................... 117 7.3.15 Monitoring, control and surveillance......................................................................... 121 7.3.16 Management evaluation .......................................................................................... 123 7.3.17 Principle 3 Performance Indicator scores and rationales ................................... 124 .................................................................... 124 .............................................................. 129 ......................................................................................... 133 ................................................................................. 135 ............................................................................... 137 ............................................................................ 143 ........................................ 148 8 References .................................................................................................. 150 9 Appendices
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FISH LIST WISH LIST: a Case for Updating the Canadian Government’S Guidance for Common Names on Seafood
    FISH LIST WISH LIST: A case for updating the Canadian government’s guidance for common names on seafood Authors: Christina Callegari, Scott Wallace, Sarah Foster and Liane Arness ISBN: 978-1-988424-60-6 © SeaChoice November 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY . 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 4 Findings . 5 Recommendations . 6 INTRODUCTION . 7 APPROACH . 8 Identification of Canadian-caught species . 9 Data processing . 9 REPORT STRUCTURE . 10 SECTION A: COMMON AND OVERLAPPING NAMES . 10 Introduction . 10 Methodology . 10 Results . 11 Snapper/rockfish/Pacific snapper/rosefish/redfish . 12 Sole/flounder . 14 Shrimp/prawn . 15 Shark/dogfish . 15 Why it matters . 15 Recommendations . 16 SECTION B: CANADIAN-CAUGHT SPECIES OF HIGHEST CONCERN . 17 Introduction . 17 Methodology . 18 Results . 20 Commonly mislabelled species . 20 Species with sustainability concerns . 21 Species linked to human health concerns . 23 Species listed under the U .S . Seafood Import Monitoring Program . 25 Combined impact assessment . 26 Why it matters . 28 Recommendations . 28 SECTION C: MISSING SPECIES, MISSING ENGLISH AND FRENCH COMMON NAMES AND GENUS-LEVEL ENTRIES . 31 Introduction . 31 Missing species and outdated scientific names . 31 Scientific names without English or French CFIA common names . 32 Genus-level entries . 33 Why it matters . 34 Recommendations . 34 CONCLUSION . 35 REFERENCES . 36 APPENDIX . 39 Appendix A . 39 Appendix B . 39 FISH LIST WISH LIST: A case for updating the Canadian government’s guidance for common names on seafood 2 GLOSSARY The terms below are defined to aid in comprehension of this report. Common name — Although species are given a standard Scientific name — The taxonomic (Latin) name for a species. common name that is readily used by the scientific In nomenclature, every scientific name consists of two parts, community, industry has adopted other widely used names the genus and the specific epithet, which is used to identify for species sold in the marketplace.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockfish (Sebastes) That Are Evolutionarily Isolated Are Also
    Biological Conservation 142 (2009) 1787–1796 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Rockfish (Sebastes) that are evolutionarily isolated are also large, morphologically distinctive and vulnerable to overfishing Karen Magnuson-Ford a,b, Travis Ingram c, David W. Redding a,b, Arne Ø. Mooers a,b,* a Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby BC, Canada V5A 1S6 b IRMACS, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby BC, Canada V5A 1S6 c Department of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, #2370-6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Z4 article info abstract Article history: In an age of triage, we must prioritize species for conservation effort. Species more isolated on the tree of Received 23 September 2008 life are candidates for increased attention. The rockfish genus Sebastes is speciose (>100 spp.), morpho- Received in revised form 10 March 2009 logically and ecologically diverse and many species are heavily fished. We used a complete Sebastes phy- Accepted 18 March 2009 logeny to calculate a measure of evolutionary isolation for each species and compared this to their Available online 22 April 2009 morphology and imperilment. We found that evolutionarily isolated species in the northeast Pacific are both larger-bodied and, independent of body size, morphologically more distinctive. We examined Keywords: extinction risk within rockfish using a compound measure of each species’ intrinsic vulnerability to Phylogenetic diversity overfishing and categorizing species as commercially fished or not. Evolutionarily isolated species in Extinction risk Conservation priorities the northeast Pacific are more likely to be fished, and, due to their larger sizes and to life history traits Body size such as long lifespan and slow maturation rate, they are also intrinsically more vulnerable to overfishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiscale Habitat Suitability Modeling for Canary Rockfish
    MULTISCALE HABITAT SUITABILITY MODELING FOR CANARY ROCKFISH (SEBASTES PINNIGER) ALONG THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA COAST By Portia Naomi Saucedo A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Natural Resources: Environmental and Natural Resource Sciences Committee Membership Dr. Jim Graham, Committee Chair Dr. Brian Tissot, Committee Member Dr. Joe Tyburczy, Committee Member Dr. Alison Purcell O’Dowd, Graduate Coordinator July 2017 ABSTRACT MULTISCALE HABITAT SUITABILITY MODELING FOR CANARY ROCKFISH (SEBASTES PINNIGER) ALONG THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA COAST Portia N. Saucedo Detailed spatially-explicit data of the potential habitat of commercially important rockfish species are a critical component for the purposes of marine conservation, evaluation, and planning. Predictive habitat modeling techniques are widely used to identify suitable habitat in un-surveyed regions. This study elucidates the predicted distribution of canary rockfish (Sebastes pinniger) along the largely un-surveyed northern California coast using data from visual underwater surveys and predictive terrain complexity covariates. I used Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) modelling software to identify regions of suitable habitat for S. pinniger greater than nine cm in total length at two spatial scales. The results of this study indicate the most important environmental covariate was proximity to the interface between hard and soft substrate. I also examined the predicted probability of presence for each model run. MaxEnt spatial predictions varied in predicted probability for broad-scale and each of the fine-scale regions. Uncertainty in predictions was considered at several levels and spatial uncertainty was quantified and mapped. The predictive modeling efforts allowed spatial predictions outside the sampled area at both the broad- and fine-scales accessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal and Spatial Management Tools for Marine Ecosystems: Case Studies from Northern Brazil and Northeastern United States
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses October 2019 TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL MANAGEMENT TOOLS FOR MARINE ECOSYSTEMS: CASE STUDIES FROM NORTHERN BRAZIL AND NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES Beatriz dos Santos Dias University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation dos Santos Dias, Beatriz, "TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL MANAGEMENT TOOLS FOR MARINE ECOSYSTEMS: CASE STUDIES FROM NORTHERN BRAZIL AND NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES" (2019). Doctoral Dissertations. 1714. https://doi.org/10.7275/15232062 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/1714 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL MANAGEMENT TOOLS FOR MARINE ECOSYSTEMS: CASE STUDIES FROM NORTHERN BRAZIL AND NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES A Dissertation Presented by BEATRIZ DOS SANTOS DIAS Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment Of the requirement for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 2019 Department of Environmental Conservation Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology © Copyright by Beatriz dos Santos Dias 2019 All Rights Reserved TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL MANAGEMENT TOOLS FOR MARINE ECOSYSTEMS: CASE STUDIES FROM NORTHERN BRAZIL AND NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES A Dissertation Presented By BEATRIZ DOS SANTOS DIAS Approved as to style and content by: ____________________________________________ Adrian Jordaan, Chair ____________________________________________ John T. Finn, Member ____________________________________________ Michael G.
    [Show full text]
  • Wasted Resources: Bycatch and Discards in U. S. Fisheries
    Wasted Resources: Bycatch and discards in U. S. Fisheries by J. M. Harrington, MRAG Americas, Inc. R. A. Myers, Dalhousie University A. A. Rosenberg, University of New Hampshire Prepared by MRAG Americas, Inc. For Oceana July 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 NATIONAL OVERVIEW 9 Introduction 9 Methodology 11 Discarded Bycatch Estimates for the 27 Major Fisheries in the U.S. 12 Recommendations 17 Definitions of Key Terms Used in the Report 19 Acronyms and Abbreviations Used in the Report 20 NORTHEAST 25 Northeast Groundfish Fishery 27 Target landings 28 Regulations 30 Discards 32 Squid, Mackerel and Butterfish Fishery 41 Target landings 42 Regulations 44 Discards 44 Monkfish Fishery 53 Target landings 53 Regulations 54 Discards 55 Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery 59 Target landings 59 Regulations 60 Discards 61 Spiny Dogfish Fishery 69 Target landings 69 Regulations 70 Discards 70 Atlantic Surf Clam and Ocean Quahog Fishery 75 Target landings 75 Regulations 76 Discards 76 Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery 79 Target landings 79 Regulations 80 Discards 81 Atlantic Sea Herring Fishery 85 Target landings 85 Regulations 86 Discards 87 Northern Golden Tilefish Fishery 93 Target landings 93 Regulations 94 Discards 94 Atlantic Bluefish Fishery 97 Target landings 97 Regulations 98 Discards 98 Deep Sea Red Crab Fishery 101 Target landings 101 Regulations 101 Discards 102 SOUTHEAST 103 Shrimp Fishery of the South Atlantic 105 Target landings 105 Regulations 106 Discards 107 Snapper and Grouper of the South Atlantic 111 Target
    [Show full text]
  • Approved List of Japanese Fishery Fbos for Export to Vietnam Updated: 11/6/2021
    Approved list of Japanese fishery FBOs for export to Vietnam Updated: 11/6/2021 Business Approval No Address Type of products Name number FROZEN CHUM SALMON DRESSED (Oncorhynchus keta) FROZEN DOLPHINFISH DRESSED (Coryphaena hippurus) FROZEN JAPANESE SARDINE ROUND (Sardinops melanostictus) FROZEN ALASKA POLLACK DRESSED (Theragra chalcogramma) 420, Misaki-cho, FROZEN ALASKA POLLACK ROUND Kaneshin Rausu-cho, (Theragra chalcogramma) 1. Tsuyama CO., VN01870001 Menashi-gun, FROZEN PACIFIC COD DRESSED LTD Hokkaido, Japan (Gadus macrocephalus) FROZEN PACIFIC COD ROUND (Gadus macrocephalus) FROZEN DOLPHIN FISH ROUND (Coryphaena hippurus) FROZEN ARABESQUE GREENLING ROUND (Pleurogrammus azonus) FROZEN PINK SALMON DRESSED (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) - Fresh fish (excluding fish by-product) Maekawa Hokkaido Nemuro - Fresh bivalve mollusk. 2. Shouten Co., VN01860002 City Nishihamacho - Frozen fish (excluding fish by-product) Ltd 10-177 - Frozen processed bivalve mollusk Frozen Chum Salmon (round, dressed, semi- dressed,fillet,head,bone,skin) Frozen Alaska Pollack(round,dressed,semi- TAIYO 1-35-1 dressed,fillet) SANGYO CO., SHOWACHUO, Frozen Pacific Cod(round,dressed,semi- 3. LTD. VN01840003 KUSHIRO-CITY, dressed,fillet) KUSHIRO HOKKAIDO, Frozen Pacific Saury(round,dressed,semi- FACTORY JAPAN dressed) Frozen Chub Mackerel(round,fillet) Frozen Blue Mackerel(round,fillet) Frozen Salted Pollack Roe TAIYO 3-9 KOMABA- SANGYO CO., CHO, NEMURO- - Frozen fish 4. LTD. VN01860004 CITY, - Frozen processed fish NEMURO HOKKAIDO, (excluding by-product) FACTORY JAPAN
    [Show full text]
  • ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List February 2007 Sorted on Scientific Name
    ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List Sorted on Scientific Name February 2007 Scientific name English Name French name Spanish Name Code Abalistes stellaris (Bloch & Schneider 1801) Starry triggerfish AJS Abbottina rivularis (Basilewsky 1855) Chinese false gudgeon ABB Ablabys binotatus (Peters 1855) Redskinfish ABW Ablennes hians (Valenciennes 1846) Flat needlefish Orphie plate Agujón sable BAF Aborichthys elongatus Hora 1921 ABE Abralia andamanika Goodrich 1898 BLK Abralia veranyi (Rüppell 1844) Verany's enope squid Encornet de Verany Enoploluria de Verany BLJ Abraliopsis pfefferi (Verany 1837) Pfeffer's enope squid Encornet de Pfeffer Enoploluria de Pfeffer BJF Abramis brama (Linnaeus 1758) Freshwater bream Brème d'eau douce Brema común FBM Abramis spp Freshwater breams nei Brèmes d'eau douce nca Bremas nep FBR Abramites eques (Steindachner 1878) ABQ Abudefduf luridus (Cuvier 1830) Canary damsel AUU Abudefduf saxatilis (Linnaeus 1758) Sergeant-major ABU Abyssobrotula galatheae Nielsen 1977 OAG Abyssocottus elochini Taliev 1955 AEZ Abythites lepidogenys (Smith & Radcliffe 1913) AHD Acanella spp Branched bamboo coral KQL Acanthacaris caeca (A. Milne Edwards 1881) Atlantic deep-sea lobster Langoustine arganelle Cigala de fondo NTK Acanthacaris tenuimana Bate 1888 Prickly deep-sea lobster Langoustine spinuleuse Cigala raspa NHI Acanthalburnus microlepis (De Filippi 1861) Blackbrow bleak AHL Acanthaphritis barbata (Okamura & Kishida 1963) NHT Acantharchus pomotis (Baird 1855) Mud sunfish AKP Acanthaxius caespitosa (Squires 1979) Deepwater mud lobster Langouste
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Potential Assessment of Redfish (Sebastes Mentella and S
    Quebec, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat and Maritimes Regions Science Advisory Report 2011/044 RECOVERY POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT OF REDFISH (SEBASTES MENTELLA AND S. FASCIATUS) IN THE NORTHWEST ATLANTIC Figure 1. Map of the northwest Atlantic showing the distribution of redfish and the boundaries of the management units Context In April 2010, following a significant decline in the abundance of mature individuals, the Deepwater redfish (Sebastes mentella) population in the Gulf of St. Lawrence/Laurentian Channel was designated as "endangered" while the northern population was given the status of "threatened" species by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). Meanwhile, the Acadian redfish (S. fasciatus) population in Atlantic Canada was designated as "threatened". A Recovery Potential Assessment (RPA) was implemented by DFO Science to provide information and the scientific advice required to meet various requirements of the Species at Risk Act (SARA) and develop, where appropriate, a recovery strategy. This advice describes the status of redfish populations of the Northwest Atlantic that have been designated as "threatened" and "endangered". Recovery targets as well as projections are presented for each population. The main threats are described and measures to promote population recovery have been identified. Various recovery scenarios are presented and a recovery potential advice is provided. August 2011 (Erratum: June 2013) Quebec, Newfoundland and Labrador, Recovery Potential Assessment of Redfish and Maritimes Regions (Sebastes fasciatus and S. mentella) in the Northwest Atlantic SUMMARY • COSEWIC identified two designatable units (DU) for deepwater redfish (Sebastes mentella): Gulf of St. Lawrence/Laurencian Channel (Unit 1+2) and northern population (SA0+2+3KLNO).
    [Show full text]
  • Nom Français
    CODE Nom Français Nom scientifique Nom Anglais Famille Ordre KCP Abadèche du Cap Genypterus capensis Kingklip Ophidiidae OPHIDIIFORMES CUB Abadèche noir Genypterus maculatus Black cusk-eel Ophidiidae OPHIDIIFORMES CUS Abadèche rosé Genypterus blacodes Pink cusk-eel Ophidiidae OPHIDIIFORMES CUC Abadèche rouge Genypterus chilensis Red cusk-eel Ophidiidae OPHIDIIFORMES OFZ Abadèche sans jambes Lamprogrammus exutus Legless cuskeel Ophidiidae OPHIDIIFORMES CEX Abadèches nca Genypterus spp Cusk-eels nei Ophidiidae OPHIDIIFORMES OPH Abadèches, brotules nca Ophidiidae Cusk-eels, brotulas nei Ophidiidae OPHIDIIFORMES ALR Ablette Alburnus alburnus Bleak Cyprinidae CYPRINIFORMES ZML Acanthure à pierreries Zebrasoma gemmatum Spotted tang Acanthuridae ACANTHUROIDEI ZLV Acanthure à queue jaune Zebrasoma xanthurum Yellowtail tang Acanthuridae ACANTHUROIDEI MPS Achigan à grande bouche Micropterus salmoides Largemouth black bass Centrarchidae PERCOIDEI LQT Acmée râpe Lottia limatula File limpet Lottiidae GASTROPODA ISA Acoupa aile-courte Isopisthus parvipinnis Bigtooth corvina Sciaenidae PERCOIDEI WEW Acoupa blanc Atractoscion nobilis White weakfish Sciaenidae PERCOIDEI YNV Acoupa cambucu Cynoscion virescens Green weakfish Sciaenidae PERCOIDEI WKK Acoupa chasseur Macrodon ancylodon King weakfish Sciaenidae PERCOIDEI WEP Acoupa du Pérou Cynoscion analis Peruvian weakfish Sciaenidae PERCOIDEI YNJ Acoupa mongolare Cynoscion jamaicensis Jamaica weakfish Sciaenidae PERCOIDEI SWF Acoupa pintade Cynoscion nebulosus Spotted weakfish Sciaenidae PERCOIDEI WKS Acoupa
    [Show full text]
  • Deepwater Redfish/Acadian Redfish Complex Sebastes Mentella and Sebastes Fasciatus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Deepwater Redfish/Acadian Redfish complex Sebastes mentella and Sebastes fasciatus Deepwater Redfish Gulf of St. Lawrence - Laurentian Channel Population Deepwater Redfish Northern Population Acadian Redfish Atlantic Population Acadian Redfish Bonne Bay Population in Canada Deepwater Redfish Gulf of St. Lawrence - Laurentian Channel Population – ENDANGERED Deepwater Redfish Northern Population – THREATENED Acadian Redfish Atlantic Population – THREATENED Acadian Redfish Bonne Bay Population – SPECIAL CONCERN 2010 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2010. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Deepwater Redfish/Acadian Redfish complex Sebastes mentella and Sebastes fasciatus, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 80 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Red Méthot for writing the status report on the Deepwater Redfish/Acadian Redfish complex Sebastes mentella and Sebastes fasciatus in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Alan Sinclair, Co-Chair of the COSEWIC Marine Fishes Specialist Subcommittee, and Howard Powles, previous Co-Chair of the COSEWIC Marine Fishes Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le complexe sébaste atlantique/ sébaste d’Acadie (Sebastes mentella et Sebastes fasciatus) au Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallineta Y Merluza De Cola
    Proyecto de Estudio de mercado de especies con posibilidades de expansión en caladeros y mercados: gallineta y merluza de cola 2 Edición: Organización de Productores de Buques Congeladores de Merlúcidos, Cefalópodos y Especies Varias – OPPC-3 – Elaboración: SINERXIA Plus Consultora S.L. Antía Lourido Rocío Rolle Belén Váquez Impresión: Nino Centro de Impresión Digital Vigo, diciembre de 2017 ÍNDICE Pág. 3 INTRODUCCIÓN 04 ESTUDIO DEL CONSUMIDOR 07 . Investigación cuantitativa: encuesta 08 . Comportamiento de los/as consumidores/as 26 . Método delphi: expertos/as 38 . Investigación cualitativa: grupos de discusión 62 ESTUDIO DE LA COMPETENCIA 77 . Productos alternativos 78 . Análisis de las especies competencia 102 . Benchmarking 129 ESTUDIO DE CANAL Y FORMAS DE DISTRIBUCIÓN 144 . Análisis de canales de distribución y venta 145 . Test de producto(s) 164 ESTRATEGIA DE INTRODUCCIÓN 182 . Definición de estrategia 183 . Selección de técnicas de venta 198 4 INTRODUCCIÓN INTRODUCCIÓN 5 La OPPC-3 (Organización de Productores de Buques Congeladores de Merlúcidos, Cefalópodos y Especies Varias ) ha manifestado su interés en la realización y desarrollo del Proyecto de Estudio de mercado de especies con posibilidades de expansión en caladeros y mercados: gallineta y merluza de cola. La finalidad de este Proyecto es realizar un análisis profundo del conocimiento, la percepción y la actitud de los y las responsables de las compras del hogar en relación a las dos especies de pescado mencionadas y objeto del presente estudio. A través del diseño y uso de diferentes técnicas de investigación cuantitativa y cualitativa, desde SINERXIA Plus Consultora se ha indagado en las valoraciones y motivaciones que manifiestan las personas responsables de la introducción de un producto alimentario en los hogares españoles, es decir las que son responsables de la compra y las tareas del hogar y por lo tanto las facilitadoras de que el consumo de pescado congelado aumente entre los miembros del hogar.
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Review of Sebastes Taxonomy and Systematics
    An Historical Review of Sebastes Taxonomy and Systematics ARTHUR W. KENDALL, Jr. Discovery: The Late 1700’s terested in these fishes for well over a onym of Serranus scriba, and the rock­ The systematics of the speciose genus century. Fernholm and Wheeler (1983) fish was left without a type species for Sebastes1, rockfishes, particularly in the detailed problems associated with the reference. This made way for recogniz­ North Pacific, have challenged ichthy­ early descriptions of Sebastes. The first ing Ascanius (1772) as the author of ologists and others even casually in­ scholarly reference to a rockfish was by Perca norvegica (i.e. Sebastes norvegi­ Linnaeus (1761) who included Norway cus), the most common rockfish of the and Italy as the range of a fish he northeastern Atlantic. 1 Sebastiscus and Hozukius have been consid­ ered subgenera of Sebastes by some and sepa­ described in 1758 and named Perca rate but closely related genera by others. This marina. In his former publication (Lin­ Proliferation of Subgenera: paper will consider each a separate genus and naeus, 1758), he also described Perca 1861–1898 will focus primarily on the taxonomic history of Sebastes. Sebastes is by far the most species­ scriba, a Mediterranean serranid. Reit­ By 1845, similar fish had been de­ rich and widely distributed genus; Sebastiscus erating his description of Perca marina, scribed as species of Sebastes from and Hozukius have three and two species, respec­ tively, and occur only in the northwest Pacific. Linnaeus (1761) cited the common both the eastern and western North Pa­ As will be discussed later, Sebastes and these Norwegian name (uer or rödfisk) for cific.
    [Show full text]