DOCSLIB.ORG

SENATE—Monday, January 29, 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

714 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE January 29, 2001 SENATE—Monday, January 29, 2001 The Senate met at 12 noon and was RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY there can be a full reading of the record called to order by the Honorable LEADER and a discussion of their record. But I GEORGE ALLEN, a Senator from the The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- also think it is important that we do State of Virginia. pore. The Chair recognizes the major- come to a conclusion and reach a vote. ity leader, the Senator from Mis- There has been good cooperation on PRAYER sissippi, Mr. LOTT. both sides of the aisle, and from com- The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, are there mittees, over the past month when Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: any other proceedings or announce- they were chaired by Democrats and Let us pray. ments that need to be made at this last week as it continued under Repub- Dear God, You constantly are seek- time? lican leadership. We will have com- ing us. Our desire to pray arises in our The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Not at pleted all the nominations but one by hearts because You want to love, guide, this time. tomorrow afternoon. I hope we can inspire, and empower us. The greatest f move to that nomination expeditiously gift we can receive in this time of also. prayer is more of You. Whatever else SCHEDULE Again, I am sure we will have a full You give or withhold is to draw us clos- Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, today the debate, but I think after a reasonable er to You. Senate will be in a period of morning period of time we should come to a In our world of politics, so often the business until 2 p.m., with the two vote so the Justice Department can question is, ‘‘Who gets the glory?’’ We leaders or their designees in control of have an Attorney General in place and confess that often we become obsessed that time. Following morning business, can begin to do the very important job by concern over whether we have been the Senate will begin consideration of that he will have to carry forward. recognized for our abilities or rewarded Gale Norton’s nomination to be Sec- I thank my colleagues for their at- for our accomplishments. Your admo- retary of the Interior. Under the pre- tention and look forward to the debate nition to us through Jeremiah helps us vious order that was entered into last this week and working with the leader- order our priorities. ‘‘Let not the wise week, there will be up to 4 hours of de- ship on the schedule. man glory in his wisdom, let not the bate on the Norton nomination during Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, if the dis- mighty man glory in his might, nor let today’s session. Tomorrow the Senate tinguished Senator will yield for a the rich man glory in his riches, but let will complete debate on the Norton comment? him who glories glory in this, that he nomination as well as consider the Mr. LOTT. I will be glad to yield. understands and knows Me, that I am nominations of Governor Whitman to Mr. LEAHY. On the nomination of the Lord, exercising loving kindness, be the Environmental Protection Agen- Senator Ashcroft to be Attorney Gen- judgment, and righteousness in the cy Administrator and Elaine Chao to eral, I understand the White House ac- earth. For in these I delight.’’—Jere- be Secretary of Labor. Those confirma- tually sent the nomination up this miah 9:23–24. tion votes are scheduled to occur at morning. But even though they had not We dedicate this new week to delight 2:45 p.m. tomorrow. Following those sent it until today, to try to accommo- in what delights You. You are the only votes, the Senate will begin consider- date the new President, we held hear- One we want to please. You are our ation of the nomination of John ings prior to the inauguration of the heart’s delight! Amen. Ashcroft to be Attorney General. A new President. I think we had an equal f vote on that nomination is expected number of witnesses on both sides. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE prior to the Senate adjourning this There may have been one more for Sen- ator Ashcroft than against, but any- The Honorable GEORGE ALLEN led the week. way, it was completed during that Pledge of Allegiance, as follows: I should say that while the vote in the Judiciary Committee on Senator time. Answers that were submitted I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Repub- Ashcroft was delayed until this week, I came in this weekend. lic for which it stands, one nation under God, believe there will be a vote on it either I know the distinguished chairman of indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Tuesday or Wednesday morning. I hope the committee, Senator HATCH, is out f we can begin the debate on his nomina- of the country, but I am perfectly will- tion as early as tomorrow afternoon ing, certainly on this side, to go for- APPOINTMENT OF ACTING and continue, if necessary, into the ward with the committee vote on him PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE night and Wednesday and into the as soon as he comes in, especially now The PRESIDING OFFICER. The night and into Thursday—all if nec- that the papers have come up from the clerk will please read a communication essary. White House today. I notified the to the Senate from the President pro I had a brief conversation with Sen- President’s office this morning—speak- tempore (Mr. THURMOND). ator DASCHLE this morning about the ing about Senator Ashcroft—I will not The legislative clerk read the fol- schedule for the next month or so, but take part in any filibuster, nor do I ex- lowing letter: we did not get into a deep discussion pect there to be any filibuster on this U.S. SENATE, about exactly how to proceed after the nomination. I assure the distinguished PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, votes that are now scheduled at 2:45 to- majority leader we moved as rapidly as Washington, DC, January 29, 2001. morrow afternoon. We expect to meet we could. We now actually have the To the Senate: later on today, and as we get an agree- nomination and the schedule is now in Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby ment of how we can proceed, certainly the hands of my friend from Mis- appoint the Honorable GEORGE ALLEN, a Sen- we will notify our Members to that ef- sissippi. ator from the Commonwealth of Virginia, to fect. Mr. LOTT. I thank the Senator from perform the duties of the Chair. I do want to say also, I firmly believe Vermont for that information. I think STROM THURMOND, that Senators should have every oppor- it is appropriate we actually receive President pro tempore. tunity to question the nominees to the the nomination before we vote—a little Mr. ALLEN thereupon assumed the President’s Cabinet, and to make state- small detail but that has been taken chair as Acting President pro tempore. ments on the floor if they choose so care of. ● This ‘‘bullet’’ symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor. VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:13 Feb 28, 2007 Jkt 029102 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 0686 Sfmt 0634 E:\BR01\S29JA1.000 S29JA1 erjones on PRODPC74 with SENATE January 29, 2001 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE 715 Mr. LEAHY. It always helps. That is what we are doing. We are The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- Mr. LOTT. I will be talking further looking at the record of the designate pore. The Senator from Vermont, Mr. to your leadership about how we sched- for Attorney General, what he said LEAHY. ule it this week, and I look forward to when he was attorney general, what he Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I thank getting it completed as soon as pos- did when he was attorney general, my dear friend, the senior Senator sible. what he did when he was Governor, and from Nevada, for his kind words. As al- I yield the floor, Mr. President. what he did in the Senate. ways, we rely on his leadership here, f I extend my appreciation to the Sen- too. I appreciate what he said. ator from Vermont for the job that has f RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME been done. Senator LEAHY, prior to NOMINATION OF JOHN ASHCROFT The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- coming here, was a prosecutor. He had pore. Under the previous order, the to prepare his cases to make sure all Mr. LEAHY. The President of the leadership time is reserved. the evidence was brought before the United States sent to the Senate the jury and/or the court. That is in effect nomination of John Ashcroft to be the f what he is doing, but in this instance Attorney General of the United States. MORNING BUSINESS the jury is the 100 Members of the Sen- In advance of him sending it, to accom- modate the new President and expedite The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- ate. Without a good record, we cannot the consideration of the nomination, I pore. Under the previous order, there make a good decision. convened 3 days of hearings on this will now be a period for the transaction I have not had the benefit of sitting nomination over the 4-day period from of morning business not to extend be- through all of these hearings as has the January 16 to January 19.
Recommended publications
  • The Collision of Institutional Power and Constitutional Obligations: the Use of Blue Slips in the Judicial Confirmation Process

    The Collision of Institutional Power and Constitutional Obligations: the Use of Blue Slips in the Judicial Confirmation Process

    The Collision of Institutional Power and Constitutional Obligations: The Use of Blue Slips in the Judicial Confirmation Process Ryan C. Black Michigan State University Ryan J. Owens University of Wisconsin Anthony J. Madonna University of Georgia The authors would like to thank Mitchell Sollenberger for making his data available. Additional thanks to Ryan Bakker, Jamie Carson and Richard Vining for helpful comments. Abstract In recent years, judicial nominations to lower federal courts have been blocked privately by negative blue slips returned by home state senators. We examine the conditions under which senators return these negative blue slips and whether judicial qualifications can mitigate the possible negative effects of ideological distance. We discover two results. First, consistent with existing work, ideology plays a strong role in blue slipping. Second, and more important, we find that nominee qualifications mitigate ideological extremism--but only for district court nominees. That is, while past presidents could nominate well-credentialed ideologues to the circuit courts of appeals and see them confirmed, today’s presidents cannot. In short, if presidents nominate ideologues--even those who are well qualified--to circuit courts, we will continue to observe lengthy vacancies and bitter nomination struggles between the president and Congress over those important courts. 1 Former Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis once stated about government: “Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants” (Brandeis 1913). While few would argue with the normative premise behind Brandeis's comment, many consequential policy decisions occur in private. Perhaps nowhere is the deviation from transparency-in-government more profound than in nomination politics, where the Senate's most unique institutional power (to defeat measures via obstruction) intersects with its most unique constitutional power (advice and consent) and can thwart the goals of nominating presidents.
  • What's Behind All Those Judicial Vacancies Without Nominees?

    What's Behind All Those Judicial Vacancies Without Nominees?

    April 2013 What's Behind all Those Judicial Vacancies Without Nominees? Russell Wheeler ast week, Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Charles Grassley (R-IA), said “we hear a lot about the vacancy rates. There are currently 86 Lvacancies for federal courts. But of course, you never hear the President mention the 62 vacancies that have no nominee. That is because those 62 vacancies represent nearly 75 percent of the total vacancies.” This brief paper, after noting the considerable power that home state senators have over judicial nominations, reports that: • Considerably fewer of the vacancies without nominees on April 12, Russell Wheeler is a 2013, could reasonably be expected to have had nominees by then, Visiting Fellow in the Brookings Institution’s based on patterns in the previous two administrations. Governance Studies Program and President of • Of the vacancies without nominees, almost half are in states with two the Governance Institute. Republican senators, and those vacancies are older than those in other Data for this report come from the Administrative states. Office of the U. S. Courts Judicial Vacancies • There are many more nominee-less vacancies now than at this point in Webpage, the Federal President George Bush’s presidency. Judicial Center Federal Judicial Biographical • Of the vacancies that have received nominations, the time from Directory, and my own data set. I welcome corrections. vacancy to nomination was greater in states with two Republican senators. • Although it is difficult to apportion responsibility for the number and age of nominee-less vacancies and the longer times from vacancy to nomination, we should consider a specific proposal for more transparency about pre-nomination negotiations that might produce more nominations, more quickly.
  • Constitution Over Comity: Toward Ensuring That the Senate's Advice and Consent Power Does Not "Take a Seat" to the Opportunistic Use of Senate Rules Michael C

    Constitution Over Comity: Toward Ensuring That the Senate's Advice and Consent Power Does Not "Take a Seat" to the Opportunistic Use of Senate Rules Michael C

    Santa Clara Law Review Volume 58 | Number 2 Article 3 8-3-2018 Constitution Over Comity: Toward Ensuring that the Senate's Advice and Consent Power Does Not "Take a Seat" to the Opportunistic Use of Senate Rules Michael C. Macchiarola Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael C. Macchiarola, Constitution Over Comity: Toward Ensuring that the Senate's Advice and Consent Power Does Not "Take a Seat" to the Opportunistic Use of Senate Rules, 58 Santa Clara L. Rev. 295 (2018). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol58/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara Law Review by an authorized editor of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. CONSTITUTION OVER COMITY: TOWARD ENSURING THAT THE SENATE’S ADVICE AND CONSENT POWER DOES NOT “TAKE A SEAT” TO THE OPPORTUNISTIC USE OF SENATE RULES Michael C. Macchiarola* TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................................296 I. The Senate’s Advice and Consent Power ..............................298 A. The Constitutional Basis of the Appointments Clause ............................................................................. 299 B. The Purpose of the Appointments Clause ................. 302 II. The Tradition of Senate Decorum ........................................304 A. Jefferson’s Contribution .......................................... 304 B. Senate Comity is Tested ........................................... 307 C. Stricter Guidelines for Senate Decorum – The Introduction of Rule XIX ...................................... 309 D. Invocations of Rule XIX .......................................... 309 E. Recent Rule XIX Forbearance .................................. 313 F.
  • The Senate in Transition Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Nuclear Option1

    The Senate in Transition Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Nuclear Option1

    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYL\19-4\NYL402.txt unknown Seq: 1 3-JAN-17 6:55 THE SENATE IN TRANSITION OR HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND LOVE THE NUCLEAR OPTION1 William G. Dauster* The right of United States Senators to debate without limit—and thus to filibuster—has characterized much of the Senate’s history. The Reid Pre- cedent, Majority Leader Harry Reid’s November 21, 2013, change to a sim- ple majority to confirm nominations—sometimes called the “nuclear option”—dramatically altered that right. This article considers the Senate’s right to debate, Senators’ increasing abuse of the filibuster, how Senator Reid executed his change, and possible expansions of the Reid Precedent. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 632 R I. THE NATURE OF THE SENATE ........................ 633 R II. THE FOUNDERS’ SENATE ............................. 637 R III. THE CLOTURE RULE ................................. 639 R IV. FILIBUSTER ABUSE .................................. 641 R V. THE REID PRECEDENT ............................... 645 R VI. CHANGING PROCEDURE THROUGH PRECEDENT ......... 649 R VII. THE CONSTITUTIONAL OPTION ........................ 656 R VIII. POSSIBLE REACTIONS TO THE REID PRECEDENT ........ 658 R A. Republican Reaction ............................ 659 R B. Legislation ...................................... 661 R C. Supreme Court Nominations ..................... 670 R D. Discharging Committees of Nominations ......... 672 R E. Overruling Home-State Senators ................. 674 R F. Overruling the Minority Leader .................. 677 R G. Time To Debate ................................ 680 R CONCLUSION................................................ 680 R * Former Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy for U.S. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid. The author has worked on U.S. Senate and White House staffs since 1986, including as Staff Director or Deputy Staff Director for the Committees on the Budget, Labor and Human Resources, and Finance.
  • Senate Consideration of Presidential Nominations: Committee and Floor Procedure Name Redacted Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process

    Senate Consideration of Presidential Nominations: Committee and Floor Procedure Name Redacted Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process

    Senate Consideration of Presidential Nominations: Committee and Floor Procedure name redacted Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process March 9, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL31980 Senate Consideration of Presidential Nominations: Committee and Floor Procedure Summary Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution provides that the President shall appoint officers of the United States “by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate.” This report describes the process by which the Senate provides advice and consent on presidential nominations, including receipt and referral of nominations, committee practices, and floor procedure. The vast majority of presidential appointees are confirmed routinely by the Senate. A regularized process facilitates quick action on thousands of government positions. The process also allows for lengthy scrutiny of candidates when necessary. Each year, a few hundred nominees to high-level positions are subject to Senate investigations and public hearings. Committees play the central role in the process through investigations and hearings. Senate Rule XXXI provides that nominations shall be referred to appropriate committees “unless otherwise ordered.” Most nominations are referred, although a Senate standing order provides that some nominations to specified positions will not be referred unless requested by a Senator. The Senate rule concerning committee jurisdictions (Rule XXV) broadly defines issue areas for committees, and the same jurisdictional statements generally apply to nominations as well as legislation. A committee often gathers information about a nominee either before or instead of a formal hearing. A committee considering a nomination has four options. It can report the nomination to the Senate favorably, unfavorably, or without recommendation, or it can choose to take no action.
  • History, Rules & Precedents Senate Republican Conference

    History, Rules & Precedents Senate Republican Conference

    History, Rules & Precedents of the Senate Republican Conference THE 116 TH CONGRESS Chairman John Barrasso blank HISTORY, RULES & PRECEDENTS of the SENATE REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE Table of Contents Preface ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 1 Rules of the Senate Republican Conference ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....2 A Service as Chairman or Ranking Minority Member ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 4 B Standing Committee Chair/Ranking Member Term Limits ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 4 C Limitations on Number of Chairmanships/ Ranking Memberships ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 4 D Indictment or Conviction of Committee Chair/Ranking Member ....... ....... ....... .......5 ....... E Seniority ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 5....... ....... ....... ...... F Bumping Rights ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 5 G Limitation on Committee Service ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ...5 H Assignments of Newly Elected Senators ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 5 Supplement to the Republican Conference Rules ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 6 Waiver of seniority rights .....
  • Lieutenant Governor of Missouri

    Lieutenant Governor of Missouri

    CHAPTER 2 EXECUTIVE BRANCH “The passage of the 19th amendment was a critical moment in our nation’s history not only because it gave women the right to vote, but also because it served as acknowledgement of the many significant contributions women have made to our society, and will make in the future. As the voice of the people of my legislative district, I know I stand upon the shoulders of the efforts of great women such as Susan B. Anthony and the many others who worked so diligently to advance the suffrage movement.” Representative Sara Walsh (R-50) OFFICE OF GOVERNOR 35 Michael L. Parson Governor Appointed June 1, 2018 Term expires January 2021 MICHAEL L. PARSON (Republican) was sworn in The governor’s proposal to improve economic as Missouri’s 57th governor on June 1, 2018, by and workforce development through a reorgani- Missouri Supreme Court Judge Mary R. Russell. zation of state government was overwhelmingly He came into the role of governor with a long- supported by the General Assembly. Through time commitment to serving others with over 30 these reorganization efforts, government will be years of experience in public service. more efficient and accountable to the people. Governor Parson previously served as the The restructuring also included several measures 47th lieutenant governor of Missouri. He was to address the state’s growing workforce chal- elected lieutenant governor after claiming victory lenges. in 110 of Missouri’s 114 counties and receiving Governor Parson spearheaded a bold plan to the most votes of any lieutenant governor in Mis- address Missouri’s serious infrastructure needs, souri history.
  • 10:55 AM 10:55 AM Lv. Kansas City Downtown Airpo

    10:55 AM 10:55 AM Lv. Kansas City Downtown Airpo

    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu PAGE SIX Saturday, June 27, 1992 9:30 AM Lv. Kansas City Downtown Airport Executive Beechcraft 816/842-8484 AIRCRAFT: US Tobacco Hawker TAIL NO.: N 24 SB PILOT: Dave Fontanella CO-PILOT: Frank Desetto MANIFEST: Senator Dole Walt Riker Chris Swonger, UST Sara Lowe, NRSC 10:05 AM Ar. Springfield, Missouri Regional Airport City Fueling 417/869-1990 MET BY: Randy Kammerdiener Political Director Missouri Republican Party DRIVERS: Senator Dole & Walt Riker: Randy Kammerdiener ('91 Cadillac) Chris Swonger & Sara Lowe: Eric Feltner ('92 Oldsmobile) DRIVE TIME: 20 minutes 10:25 AM Ar. University Plaza Hotel & Convention Center 333 John Q. Hammond Parkway 417/864-7333 CONTACT: Tony Hammond Executive Director Missouri Republican Party 314/636-3146 314/636-3273 (FAX) 10:30 AM- PHOTO OPPORTUNITY WITH MAJOR DONORS TO 10:50 AM MISSOURI REPUBLICAN PARTY 10:50 AM- Holding Room 10:55 AM 10:55 AM INTRODUCTION OF SENATOR DOLE -- SENATOR KIT BOND Page 1 of 71 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu PAGE SEVEN 11:00 AM- KEYNOTE ADDRESS -- SENATOR DOLE 11:25 AM Missouri Republican Party Convention CROWD SIZE: 2,500 Delegates and Alternates 11:30 AM Lv. University Plaza Hotel & Convention Center 11:50 AM Ar. Springfield Regional Airport City Fueling 417/869-1990 12:00 PM Lv. Springfield, Missouri AIRCRAFT: us Tobacco Hawker TAIL NO.: N 24 SB PILOT: Dave Fontanella CO-PILOT: Frank Desetto MANIFEST: Senator Dole Walt Riker Chris Swonger, UST Sara Lowe, NRSC 3:00 PM Ar.
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 153 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, MAY 14, 2007 No. 79 House of Representatives The House met at 10:30 a.m. and was sions and huge fireballs that lit up the liament and others claim there were called to order by the Speaker pro tem- night sky in Baghdad. significant casualties. Which story is pore (Mr. COSTA). News footage and amateur video were true? Satellite images, aerial photo- f shown on television in the Middle East, graphs, videos and written accounts and a BBC reporter described the explo- that purport to be firsthand can be DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO sions as immense. In the days following found online. I will enter into the TEMPORE the attack, U.S. military officers in RECORD a list of some of these sites so The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- Iraq repeatedly said that the damage that people can see for themselves. fore the House the following commu- would not degrade U.S. military capac- Internet sites which contains video, photo- nication from the Speaker: ity and that the attack did not injure graphs, or written accounts of the attack on Camp Falcon on October 10, 2006: WASHINGTON, DC, or kill anyone at the base. May 14, 2007. In a briefing on October 12, 2006, http://www.cawa.fr/destruction-du-camp- americain-falcon-explosions-d-armes-a-l-ua- I hereby appoint the Honorable JIM COSTA Major General William Caldwell told to act as Speaker pro tempore on this day.
  • Norm Theory and the Future of the Federal Appointments Process

    Norm Theory and the Future of the Federal Appointments Process

    GERHARDT.DOC 06/08/01 1:54 PM Essay NORM THEORY AND THE FUTURE OF THE FEDERAL APPOINTMENTS PROCESS MICHAEL J. GERHARDT† INTRODUCTION The way George W. Bush became the forty-third President of the United States was extraordinary in ways that we are still assessing.1 In addition to Bush’s contested presidential victory, the election pro- duced an unprecedented 50-50 split in the Senate, with Vice President Richard Cheney able to cast a tie-breaking vote. Because many Sen- ate votes on presidential appointments are likely to be close,2 George W. Bush’s presidency provides a unique setting for testing the robust- ness of appointments norms: the behavioral regularities of presidents and senators regarding appointments that persist in the absence of formal rules and that deviations from which trigger sanctions.3 Copyright © 2001 by Michael J. Gerhardt. † Arthur B. Hanson Professor of Law, William & Mary Law School. I am grateful to Jack Balkin, Erwin Chemerinsky, Michael Dorf, Chris Eisgruber, Deborah Gerhardt, Paul Schwartz, and David Strauss for helpful discussions regarding the subject of this Essay. 1. These circumstances are well known: George W. Bush became President after winning a majority of the Electoral College by the second-smallest margin in American history. Bush is also the first person in over 100 years to have won the presidency despite having lost the popu- lar vote. Moreover, Bush became President after an intense, postelection contest over Florida’s electors, a contest ultimately settled by the Supreme Court’s controversial 5-4 decision in Bush v. Gore, 121 S.
  • Heinonline ( Wed Nov 3 15:16:23 2010

    Heinonline ( Wed Nov 3 15:16:23 2010

    +(,121/,1( Citation: 45 Willamette L. Rev. 701 2008-2009 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Wed Nov 3 15:16:23 2010 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0191-9822 FRAGMENTED FEATURES OF THE CONSTITUTION'S UNITARY EXECUTIVE SAIKRISHNA B. PRAKASH* The assertion that the original Constitution creates a "unitary executive" can be understood as a claim that the Constitution empowers the President to control the execution of federal law. This generic assertion has as many as three sub-claims: that the President, as the "constitutional executor" of the laws,' personally may execute any federal law himself; that the President, as Chief Executive, may direct all executive officers in their execution of federal law; and that the President, as the Supreme Executive Magistrate charged2 with ensuring faithful law execution, may remove executive officers. For many advocates of the unitary executive theory, these three mechanisms of control are "absolute" powers.3 Despite Congress's various legislative powers, it cannot preclude presidential execution of federal law; it cannot bar presidential direction of executive officers or authorize executive officers to disobey presidential instructions; and it cannot prohibit or regulate presidential removal of executive officers. With their focus on the originalist bona fides of the unitary executive4 and the modem administrative state's numerous violations of the theory, 5 unitary executivists have neglected the Constitution's * Herzog Research Professor of Law, University of San Diego; James Madison Fellow, Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions, Princeton University.
  • State Campaign Finance Law: an Overview and a Call for Reform

    State Campaign Finance Law: an Overview and a Call for Reform

    Missouri Law Review Volume 55 Issue 4 Fall 1990 Article 3 Fall 1990 State Campaign Finance Law: An Overview and a Call for Reform Thomas P. Dvorak Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Thomas P. Dvorak, State Campaign Finance Law: An Overview and a Call for Reform, 55 MO. L. REV. (1990) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol55/iss4/3 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dvorak: Dvorak: State Campaign Finance Law Comments State Campaign Finance Law: An Overview and a Call for Reform Corrupt influence, which is itself the perennial spring of all prodigality, and of all disorder; which loads us, more than millions in debt; which takes away vigour from our arms, wisdom from our councils, and every shadow of authority and credit from the most venerable parts of our constitution. - Edmund Burke., Speech on Economic Reform, 1780 In the General Election of 1988, only 54.8% of the population of eligible voters in Missouri went to the polls.1 Nationwide, the 1988 elections for President and Vice-President saw only a 50.2% turnout.2 This compares with nationwide turnouts of 95.4% in Australia, 86.9% in West Germany, and 76.9% in Great Britain3 .