Updates 820611 Response to NRC 810526 Safety Evaluation & SA

' AC ~»~W»i'»~4',~>41~'~k» - S ~V ~A~l *~~~»l ~ii +>i:~<»"., ~»~»», »~»; ',~s'M~~~tr''C~Y

LITEM INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION S ) (RIOS)

ACCESSION NBR;8211090146 DOC ~ DATE: S2/11/03 NOTARIZED! NO DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C ~ Cook Nuclear Power Plant~ Unit 1~ Indiana L BYNAME 50 316 Donald C ~ Cook Nuclear Power Plant~ Unit 2~ Indiana 8 5000316 AUTH AUTHOR AFFILIATION HUNTERiR ~ ST Indiana L Michigan Electric Co. RECIP ~ NAME, RECIPIENl AFFILIATION ». » DENTONgH ~ RE Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulationg Director 31'EGULATOR SUBJECT: Updates 820611 response to NRC 810526 safety evaluation SA Varga 820503 ltr re equipment qualification, SZ> -Q./~ OISTRIBUT N, CODES A04SS C RE EIVEO:LTR ENCL SIZE ~ TITLE: OR/Licensing Submit : Equipment Qualification

NOTES: I» »

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT'D COPIES ,"», '» IO CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL I NRR ORB1 BC 12 1" 0 GROTENHUISgM 01 1 1 pC

INTERhAL~ ELD/HDS3 12 1 1 GC 13 1 IE FILE 09 1 1 NRR CALVOiJ 1 1 NRR/DE/EQB 07 2 2 NRR/OL D IR 1'. 1 NRR/OL/DRAB 06 1 1 NRR/DSI/AF8 1 NRR/DST/GIB 1 1 G E 04 1 1 RGN3 l. 1 »g

~ ~ ACRS 2 ~ ! 8 LPDR 03 2 ~I~~ EXTERNAL; 15 8 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~II~ ~ ! ~ NRC 1' 05 1 1 ~ PDR 02 NSIC ~ !~ ~ ~ » ~ NTIS 1 ~ i

~ '

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED ~ LTTR 27 ENCL 26 h INDIANA 5 MICHIGAN EiECTRIC COMPANY

P. O. BOX 10 BOWLING GREEN STATION HEW YORK, N. Y. '10004 November 3, 1982 AEP:NRC:0578H

Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 UPDATE TO EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION RESPONSE

Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Dear Mr. Denton:

This letter and its Attachments are an update of our submittal No. AEP:NRC:0578B, dated June 11, 1982. That submittal responded to the NRC's Safety Evaluation Report issued on May 26, 1981, and to Mr. Steven A. Varga's letter of May 3, 1982. A description of the Attachments to this letter follows:

(1) Attachment A. Revised Summer Sheets

Pages CI4-1, -2, -3 (Unit 1), CI6-1, -2, -3 (Unit 2), and CI10-1, -2, -3 (Units 1 and 2) are the qualification summary sheets for Continental Wire Cable, Items 83075 and 83077. In reviewing the operating time qualification for these cables, it was determined that the test report previously quoted for these cables (Ref 833) was not totally adequate, in that the test, had lasted for only 22 hours. Since the same cables had also been qualified under Conax Corporation's Test Reports No. IPS-326 and No. IPS - 327 (total test duration 91S days), we are revising the summary sheets to indicate qualification under the more complete test. Pages CP9-1, CP9-3, CPll-1 and CP11-3 (Unit 1) and CPll-1 and CP11-3 (Unit 2) reflect newly received information on Kerite Cable, Item 83127. Page TC10-1 (Unit 1) is being submitted to incorporate minor editorial corrections.

(2) Attachment B. Re uired Time uglification Anal sis This attachment constitutes equipment qualification reference packet 863. It replaces Item "R" attached to the

821109014b 821103 PDR ADOCK 05000315 P PDR

Mr. Harold R. Den AEP: NR~; 0578H

AEP:NRC:0578B submittal. This attachment was revised to include more detail and new information. (3) Attachment C. Reference List The list of references has been revised, primarily to account for changes due to the FSAR update.

(4) Attachment D. U er Com artment Tem erature

This attachment replaces Attachment 9 of the AEP:NRC:0578B submittal. This attachment was revised to account for changes due to the FSAR update. (5) Attachment E. General Notes

This attachment replaces Attachment No. 15 to AEP:NRC:0578. It is being replaced to incorporate changes due to the FSAR update. A copy of this submittal including all of the attachments is being transmitted to your Consultant, the Franklin Research Center. This document has been prepared following Corporate Procedures which incorporate a reasonable set of controls to insure its accuracy and completeness prior to signature by the undersigned. Very truly yours,

R. S. Hunter /os Vice President cc.'ohn E. Dolan - Columbus M. P. Alexich R. W. Jurgensen W. G. Smith, Jr. —Bridgman R. C. Callen G. Charnoff Joe Williams, Jr. NRC Resident Inspector at Cook Plant - Bridgman C. J. Crane —Franklin Research Center Attachment A to AEP:NRC:0578H Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Update to AEP:NRC:0578B Revised Summary Sheets HALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT NO. 1 OCE 0. 01 L E DP-8 ENVIROtlMENT DOCUMENTATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION REF.~ QUALIFICATION OUTSTANDltlG PARAfdETER SPEC. QUAL SPEC. QUAL METHOD ITEMS SYSTEM: Ygg tong Operating g-I it-NO la I QQN p 1 bl97t Time )ii- os S5 PLAtlT tD NO: Y/3$ 75= Iogg Temperalure tV, IR 95- ('F) IO7 P7-

COMPONEN T: rNSTf(QntENr Pressure I7 tf CABLE l7o- (PSIA) Z6 ~ 2 107 MAtlUFACTURER:goplTINCNTRL 33 rfb- lrr- r Relative tp, (i hlOD EL tlUhlBER:XTEPIlW RR,+ SO75 Humidity (%) l00 Iy7 33 FUNCTION: YJlgroUS Chemical 'I @gyOt l7 Spray tv A ACCURACY: SPEC: NII $ pv AM DEhlON: Np Radiation SERVICE: YAgtOuS (106 rads) /0 /Db 33 6'h;

Aging LOCATION. O>egg Cours (years)

r~ms'LOOD LEVEL ELEV: Submergence ABOVE FLOOD LEVEL: M4 svkMc+ 5 .Vgrtrit

'Documentation Reterences: i tlotes:

page 'Z+- l From Reference >33 FIRL Test Report F-C 2935, excerpt from Type of Test: Sequential Gamma Radiation Steam

0.45 HRad/Hr , 10.0 l1Rad 340 F ; 100 psig ; 2 Hrs. 0 160,F i ; 20 Hrs.

Item >3075, 3077; Continental Hire 8 Cable Co.

Page CI4-2 Reference 817 Conax Corporation Test Report IPS-326

Phase I t 250 F ; 12 psig for 1 Hr Phase II: 190 F ; 12 psig for 201 Hrs *Submerged during Phase II in 2500 ppm boron solution.

Reference 418 Conax Corporation Test Report IPS-327

Phase I 340 F; 12 psig for 1 Hr Phase II : 250 F; 12 psig for 5 Hrs Phase III: 190 F; 12 psig for 21 Hrs *Submerged during Phase III in 2500 ppm boron solution.

Page CI4-3

0 DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT tlO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-316 LICENSE NO. DPR-li EHVIROfiMEHT DOCUhlEHTATIOH E QUIPfhEHT DESCRIPTIOti REF.e QUALIFICATION OUTSTANDING PARAhlETER SPEC. QUAL SPEC. QUAL. METHOD ITEMS 4 SYSTEfh: VARIOUS(S Operating. %~ h/or tel e 3 4. '74.4 Time H~e 8 let/ 43 GO&LI%04'rd~ ss-rqzfo See Rel CS ro2-f PLANT ID NO: VARtOuS p+ ygq Temperature rV~ ISq fob-ivy g36 - $ +3 lo7 ss s~«e«e r« I nS-/74X4'. COhlPONEHT: IIVS7'fr'MMFN1 ol MSLE Pressure S'I (PSIA) Zo+ &'f htAIIUfACTURER: coA/VIA/Eh/T wee Aha CABLE ce. 227 gjk5 Relative )'7q $ 'bq hlOD EL NUhlBER:~gag 4'~7~ J(7 Cf Humidity (%) 3E FUtICTION: VQRIOMS Chemical k6'e>fP 17~I% A/A ACCURACY: SPFC: A/A Spray 4oro«. DEfhON:yA Radiation SERVICE: VARIOLAR+ (106 rads) h/4 Se~«~sr. I

Aging LOCATION. cry'F (years) coW AIREh/7" FLOOD LEVEL ELEV: A/g Submergence 17~I% ABOVE FLOOD LEVEL:yg vA s«l,~eJ rW 'Documentation References: Notes: 0 g A

rage cr'4-I ~ ~

From Reference 833 FIRL Test Report F-C 2935, excerpt from Type of Test: Sequential Gamma Radiation Steam

0.45 MRad/Hr:g 10.0 MRad 340 F ; 100 psig ; 2 Hrs. 16O, F: g 20 Hrs.

Item 83075, 3077; Continental Mire 8 Cable Co.

4 F

"C 4 I

Page CI6-2 ~ P Reference 817 Conax Corporation Test Report IPS-326

Phase I s 250 F ; 12. psig for 1 Hr

Phase II; 190 F ~ 12, psig for 201 Hrs *Submerged during Phase II in 2500 ppm boron solution.

Reference 818 Conax Corporation Test Report IPS-327

Phase I 340 F; 12 psig for 1 Hr Phase II : 250 F ; 12 psig for 5 Hrs Phase III: 190 F ; 12 psig for 21 Hrs *Submerged during Phase III in 2500 ppm boron solution.

Page CI6-3 ~ + I t ~ ~ ALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT ~ 1 UNIT NO. DOCKET NO.~ 50-315 LIC NO DP -8 ENVIRONMENT DOCUhlENTATION EgUIPMEHT OESCRIPTIOH REF gUALIFICATION OUTSTANDING PARAhlETER SPEC. EQUAL} SPEC. t)UAL. METHOD ITEMS SYSTEM: V/IRIOUS OperaHng I 25-i Time ) $.)No IOI C oNI81%/}1 I 0/tf

PLANT ID HO: V/lglouS Temperature /f'3 ('F) +30 I 07 CQMPONE HT:Tr/sTRHrvlENT. I7 /P CABLE Pressure (PSIA) 24 'Z I07 MANUFACTURER:Conmrt/pNrpL /7/ Relative /f'3 MODEL NUMBER'v )oo Em % 30/7 Humidity (5) )D7 FUNCTION: vJRlouS Chemical >Soo /7 No ACCURACY'PEC:iVR Spray Liras /0'7lg I OEhlOH' j) Radiation /t/4. SERVICE: V/)RIOTS (106 rads) IO

Aging LOCATION: Ook 0C ~ 'n4 (years) FLOOD LEVEL ELEV: Submergence ABOVE FLOOD LEVEL: /tJA NA NA

'DocumentaUon References: Holes:

page CI I0 From Reference ~33 FIRL Test Report F-C 2935, excerpt from Type of Test: Sequential Gamma Radiation Steam

0.45 thRad/Hr , 10.0 MRad 340 F ; 100 psig g 2 Hrs. 16O,F ' 20 Hrs.

Item 83075, 3077; Continental Mire 8. Cable Co.

Page CI10-2

Reference 817 Conax Corporation Test Report IPS-326

Phase I t 250 F ; 12 psig for 1 Hr

Phase II; 190 F ~ 12 psig for 201 Hrs *Submerged during Phase II in 2500 ppm boron solution.

Reference 818 Conax Corporation Test Report IPS-327

Phase I 340 F; 12 psig for 1 Hr.

Phase II : 250 F ~ 12 psig for 5 Hrs Phase III: 190 F ; 12 psig for 21 Hrs *Submerged during Phase III in 2500 ppm boron solution.

Page CI10-3 DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UtIIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-316 LICENSE NO. DPR-74 ENVIRONMENT OOCUhlENTATION E QUIP MENT DESCRIPT! ON QUALIFICATION OUTSTANDING REF.'UAL PARAMETER SPEC. SPEC. QUAL. METHOD ITEMS SYSTEM: VPRIOuS Operating. I'Tq 1%~ A/owe. ts r5 Time 4. No~e4 74.4H )c? l >7 20 $3 Cogmob> ~ See Rek. ~t'.3 74-'illXg/)~lg PLANT ID HO: VITRIgMS Temperature IT~i%~ tos X30 (oF) ~4.O . Ilail%~ )o7 +Sy ~+/Olt IVS-jan% X+;. COhlPONENT: ljl/STRfAMENT t7'f-I 50 X'4. ABLE Pressure t<9-l'I (PSIA) g,('. 9, I t+.7 IuSp MANUFACTURER:coaV'I/rlEA/lgL t92-20ox]s',r6 WIM PhlD C'est.P co. Relative I'7~1 fp 202 203 Sp h!OOEL NUhtBER: 43p77 OO pe~ Humidity (%) f l oO )07 FUtiCTION: QPLIOQS Chemical ~'~l'I'v,w ACCtJRACY: SPEC: h/Q Spray h/A DEhION:A/A Radialion SERVICE: yg+Ogc (10 rads) iO n/A >>

Aging LOCATION'AT~I~E- co v. HE (years) FLOOD LEVEL ELEV: A/4 Submergence ABOVE PL000 LEVEL:p/g 5~I~ el h/A Ss~.e ~inst 'Documentation Relerences: Notes: 0

A G I 'LD

I M j

page CALO From Reference 833 FIRL Test Report F-C 2935, excerpt from Type of Test: Sequential Gamma Radiation- Steam

0.45 NRad/Hr:g 10.0 NRad 0 340 F ; 100 psig ;. 2 Hrs. 0 160,F ~ g 20 Hrs.

Item 83075, 3077; Continental >lire 5 Cable Co.

Page CI10-2 Reference 817 Conax Corporation Test Report IPS-326

Phase I s 250 F; 12 psig for 1 Hr

Phase II; 190 F ~ 12 psig for 201 Hrs *Submerged during Phase I'I in 2500 ppm boron solution.

Reference 818 Conax Corporation Test Report IPS-327

Phase I 340 F ; 12 psig for 1 Hr, Phase II : 250 F ; 12 psig for 5 Hrs Phase III: 190 F ; 12 psig for 21 Hrs *Submerged during Phase III in 2500 ppm boron solution.

Page CI10-3

DONALD C. COOK HUCLEAA PLANT UNIT HO. I DOCKET NO. 50-3I5 LICENSE 0 DP ENVIROHhlEHT DOCUhlEtITATION EQUIPhlEtIT DESCRIPTIOH AF.F.'UALIFICAT!OH OUTSTAtlDltlG S7-Co v'l PARAMETER SPEC. QUAL SPEC. QUAL. METIIOD ITEMS $'2 g3 Va- YSTEM: ~qrl'o

Aetatlve /oz 410DEL IIUhlDER: I6m W /OO llumldlly (X) (oo Io3 FUNCTION't oooo// rg >6od y ~/ Chemical fr'ufphrs 7( A/o u E. I l~ ~]q gP I.5 g. 7L CoAI "4'-» ACCURACY: SPEC: AJ4 Spray ~~ P ty.s (( (8 d.r-l( 7 ~ EQ+ DEMOH: d+ Radl allen gg rt'ug(ut Ih + SERVICE: Pj~g J~ (IOS rads) g,oo vga bring LOG ATIOH: g ps( ~ ~e(q~ (years) FLOOD LEVEL ELEV: 4/h g-corn + AJouC Submergencn 5 vLN(apl 5 pro 0 JP>V('~ ADOVE FLOOD LEVEL: p/o 7C Erg, tsj 'Dncumentatlen References: tlales: 0

page F T-/ —PMASE r PMASE; ZE (MASK m, COMBINED THERMAL AND SIMULTANEOUS STEAM/CHEMICALSPRAY/RADIATION EXPOSURE STEAM ANO CHEMICAL- RADIATION AGING (I50 MEGARAOS GAMMA RADIATION) SPRAY EXPOSURE (50 MEGARAOS (No GAMMA RADIATION) GAMMA RADIATION) 346'F/II3 psig WITHIN 3 TO 5MIN. 335 F/95psig 540 520 3I5 F/69pslg

~~IINSULAT(oN 265'F/28 psig R ES ISTANCE MEASUREMENT n'- 250~~

280'F/70 pslg (min) VlITHIN10 SEC. 2I2~F/Opsig E WI- 2oo DAILY I22 F(50 C)MAXIMUM (ONCE PER 'WEEK STARTING AT 5 DAYS CABLES AT ROOM CONDITIONS DURING RELOCATION OF TEST l40 VESSEL TO OUTSIDE OF THE 77 DAYS RADIATION HOTCELL. l22 PREHEAT To l40'F MAXIMUM Q+ IMMEDIATELYPRIOR To TEST

~~lo 3 5 e l5 23 IOO 7DAYS SEC HR HR HR HR HR 4 DAYS DAYS DAYS TIME~~~

~~Figure l. Spec)f)ed Temperature, Pressure and Rad)at)on Test Prof)1e~~

DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT HO. I DDCI{ET HO. 50-315 LICENSE O. DP- ENVIRONMENT DOC UMEtITATIOH EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTIOH AEF 'UALIFICATION OUTSTAtIDIIIG SPEC. QUAL SPEC. QUAL. hlETIIOD ITEMS vs'ARAhlETEA SYSTEM: vpgrous Operallng AJou K ~Mi'n4ioW Time 8+CZ g 7~ PLANT IO NO: >F. 2 58puEgAR f-

~~COMPONENT:~~

~~FLOOD LEVEL ELEV: Gl>'BOVE Submergenca FLOOD LEVEI-: fEJ p+~~

~~'Dncumenlallen References: Holes:~~

~~p CPI/-/~~

—PHASE I PHASE 0 PHASE m COMBINED THERMAL AND SIMULTANEOUS STEA M/CHEMICAL-SPRAY/RADtATIONEXPOSURE STEAM AND CHEMICAL- R ADIATION AGING (l50 MEGARAOS GAMMA RADtATION) SPRAY EXPOSURE (50 MEGARADS (NO GAMMA RADtATION) GAMMA RADIATION) 346 F/It3 ps)a WITHIN 3 To 5MIN. 335 F/95pslg 84O 520 3)5 F/69pstt).

~~@INSULATION 265 F/28pstg RESISTANCE MEASUREMENT < 250 P- kdO~C'j 70pstg (tnln) WITHINIO SEC. 2I2'F/0 psig~~

+ ~ t 200 DAILY l22iF (50 C) MAXIMUM 80NCE PER WEEK STARTING AT 5 DAYS CASLES AT ROOM CONDITIONS DURING RELOCATION OF TEST l40 VESSEL To OUTSIDE OF THE 77 DAYS RADIATION HOTCELL. l22 PREHEAT To I40iF MAXIMUM O+ IMMEDIATELYPRIOR TO TEST

10 3,5 8 II I5 23 IOO 7 DAYS SEC HR HR HR HR HR 4 DAYS DAYS DAYS TIME~ I F)gure 1. Spec)f)ed Temperature, Pressure and Rad)at)on Test Prof)1e DOttALD C. COCK NUCLEAR PLAtlT UNIT tl0. 2 OOCKET HO. 50.316 LlCENSE HO. OPR-74 l/2 Ett VIRCttMEHT OOCUhlEH TATIOtt P~ E t|UIP tlEt(T OESCRIPTIOH REF.'QUAL IF ICAT ION OUTSTANDING 90 t//Z 4'IETH00 PAtt AthlETER SPEC. g UAL. SPEC. gUAL. ITEMS Cth/h -N V SY ST Ehl: lh//~trv~ Operating /I$ roo ~p i/~ , r/9 t/4 Time ~rv vS PLANT t0 HO: zz.~-q3r vg QQ,t frrl> Temperature (of) 4,o-c3 cygne V/ COhlPOHEtlT: Pal%'v aos VI Pressure gogr (PSIA) Qf I IISP~/p L» 74 hlAtlUFACTURER: ]Czv/4~ 4 ~ Relative IOL '.I00EL NUhlBER: /$m Rh '3/I+ I oo 'ldd Humidity (%) Ioj FUIICTION: CeC/SL Z.Coo fEhrg P~ weal ZP< PPe 1 7( A/'c ME. Chemical f rsvp r I'IfQo +I~r 7 ACCURACY: SPEC: rr/+ Spray aorrc Aczf g4rrc- A Sa VE- g.f'a /I es-// 7Z- R+W DEhlOH: Radiation QOQ 5ERVICE: (10 rads) ]a+ 7C 5>)u~DjM PW u,/ P~<~ 4 ~Qvp ~oy~rr Aging LOCATIOtl: XEt (years) Co ~'rt~g~ fL000 LEVEL ELEY: Sf CTErTB hr. h//os< Submergence ABOVE fLOOO LEVEL: 5r/gw~ywg- gpf Qg II En Rivi~ p/r3 7 J. 5~ +Et gC ~ Oocumentation Reterences: Holes: S PHASE X PHASE fI PHASE ZZ, COMBINED THERMAL AN0 SIMULTANEOUS STEAM/CHEMICAL-SPRAY/RADIATIONEXPOSURE STEAM ANO CHEMICAL- RADIATION AGING (I50 MEGARAOS GAMMA RADIATION) SPRAY EXPOSURE {50 MEGARAOS (NO GAMMA RADIATION) GAMMA RADIATION) 346'/II3 pslg WITHIN 3 TQ 5MIN. 335'F/95 psig QIR 320 3I5 F/69pslg

~~QiiNsULATION 265'F/28pslg RESISTANCE MEASUREMENT W < 250~~

280'Fl 70psig (min) WITHINIO SEC. 2I2i% psig Z 4I + 200 ~ ~ Qj) DAII.Y l22 F(50iC)MAXIMUM ONCE PER WEEK STARTING AT 5 DAYS CABLES AT ROOM CONDITIONS DURING RELOCATION OF TEST I40 VESSEL TO OUTSIDE OF THE = 77'DAYS RADIATION HOTCELL. I22 PREHEAT TO l40iF MAXIMUM Q+ IMMEDIATELYPRIOR TO TEST

~~IO 3 5 8 II l5 23 IOO 7DAYS SEC HR HR HR HR 4 DAYS DAYS DAYS TIME~~~

F)gure 1. Spec)fjed Temperature, Pressure and Rad)at)on Test Profj1e 0 ',i o I:. r;t)t).<;:Ill:I),;,'.* nl I)IIII;tl).I . „1 r:ii). 'S i.tcr:rtsr no. -"II ENVIRO))Mali)T l.tit'.ll ii..t I A Ill)tt KQUIPMB)ITI)I. St:)t tl' ton !Il f)uht,trtch I ton OII I S I Anl)lno I'.'ltlhl.. PARNIETER Sl'L-tL tel)AL. Sl'I r'. ti)t r)lot) I ff.ti)S 's -j"r-

I'I i httl II) tl VQQIOUS Te!.IIl(:iature 2'o7 )/j':Obli'f)II I'.II f: CoN>ROL c fli'.)i=. TER)/))N/Iyeg I'rcssurc 26'2. (I Sth) top tlhttl)Irhc I liftI;It: N/A ftctativc t,lot) r.L nl)I)t)rift: v/)RIOUs /OO lluuridity (X) )OO to/ «(t/i) pnncfion: ~> ISA yam rs Chcuiical WD ) Dr< dpEOr)TOE(, fe5wr % n4'rr SI)ra/ l)ciu ~o~8)h~io ACCnnhCV: si i;c: lVR I r)g5-// W I)I:tilon:Njj ation naill 1 si:itvicr:: VAR)0~5 (IA'ails) sequence pJogp~

~~Aging I.OCAr)On: crusoe (years)~~

~~')ocumentaliuir fteferences: notes:~~

~~Vacge TClo-I 'a~~

~~E 3~~

~~4 all~~

~~t I I Ey 4~~

~~~ l$ Attachment B to AEP:NRC:0578H Donald C. Cook Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Update to AEP:NRC:0578B Required Time Analysis l qualification Vt RLCAN Kt-Ec7 C AMERICAN ELECTRIC POP/ER SERYICE CORPORATION~~

~~WE'R 5YSTE~~

~~DATE: August 19, 1982 SUBJECT: Class IE Electrical equipment in Harsh Environment Required Time Qualification Analysis~~

~~FROM< L. F. Caso To< NRC IE Bulletin 79-01B Central File~~

This memorandum addresses -the qualified time for electrical devices inside the reactor containment for which the duration of the qualification test was less than the required time during which the device may be called upon to operate following a Design Basis Event (DBE). The first thing to consider is that the relevant parameters are not the required operation time versus the test duration, but rather the post accident environment profile versus the test profile. What is required is that the equivalent intensity test environment envelops with margin (108) the required post-accident environment. Figure I, FSAR figure 5.3-10 App.N, and extrapolation to figure 022.9.1 (FSAR Appendix Q), attached, show the D. C. Cook Plant post- accident reactor containment environment. Figure I shows tne water temperature following a LOCA accident and flooding of the containment; Figure 022.9.1 shows the air temperature during worst case conditions (steam line break) . According to Figure I, equipment flooded after a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) will see an initial temperature of approximately 250oF. Approx'mately one half-hour later, water temperature will be reduced to 160 F. After ten hours, the water temperature will be reduced to approximately 106.5 F. Air temperature at 100,000 seconds (approximately 28 hrs.) following a LOCA will be about 148 F and decreasing very rapidly (see FSAR appendix N, figure 5.3-10). SLB temperatures, though initially higher (328 F), decrease more rapidly than LOCA temperatures and therefore represent less of a long term challenge to the operation of the electrical devices. Figure 022.9-1 of Appendix Q to the FSAR shows a temperature decrease to approximately 225oF'fter one minute, hold there for about 600 sec., then again decrease very rapidly so it will be about, 175 F after 1000 sec. (about 17 Min.). Type tests under which the electrical equipment in

IHTRA SYSTEM question has been qualified (referenced in the qualification summary sheets) demonstrated the ability of the subject equipment to operate in the abnormal post-accident containment environment. The postulated inside containment environment after 28 hrs. (as discussed above)., does not rep'resent a challenge to the electrical'evices (cable and cable terminations material) since they are rated at 90'C (194'F) . Hydrogen skimmer fan motors and hydrogen recombiners are located in the upper compartment. Upper compartment temperatures after 28 hrs. are about 110'F (see figure 14.3.3.10 and 14.2.5.-9 attached) . Arrhenius analysis done for the D. C. Cook Plant electrical penetrations (see letter of 7/31/81, from C. H. Shih to L. F. Caso) predicts that the elect'rical penetrations should last indefinitely in the inside containment post-accident environment. Arrhenius analysis were also performed for those . electrical cables for which we had Arrhenius plot information. Ne assumed a forty-year life at 110'F plus a Design Basis Accident (DBA); we further assumed a final ambient temperature of 120'F after the accident. The Arrhenius analysis results are summarized below:

~~Calculated Req 'd. ~ Component Life After Oper. Test Device DBA Time Duration CI2 Rockbestos Cable 839 years NA 30 days CX3 Samuel Moore Cable 402 years 4 mos.'0 days~~

~~CX8 Cerro Wire 6 Cable ~ 377 years 4 mos. 30 days~~

~~CPI2 Cyprus Cab' 74 years 3 mos'e .20 days~~

~~CP5 Anaconda Cable 48 years 1 yr. 13 days~~

Attachment l hereto lists all the devices for which the required time of operation is longer than the test duration. The component materials for each device have also been listed. Of particular importance in this list. regarding the ability of the components to function for the required time of operation are the component materials and the length of qualification tests. Bulletin 79-01B appendix C. table Cl shows that Ethylene Propylene Rubber (EPR) has a potential for significant aging after 10 years. Attachment I shows that the following items use EPR insulation:

Plant Test Req 'd. Unit Item Comments .2 CC-4 9.5 days" 14 days Difference between test duration and required oper. time not sig nificant i Plant Test Req 'd. Unit Duration Comments conszderxng the margin between the test environ ment and the DBA environment.

~~CI3 1 month 4 months Arrhenius analysis CI5 yields calculated life after DBA of 402 years.~~

~~1,2 CI9 1 month 4 months Same as CI3 CP2 7 days 30 days Outside containment environment only. Arrhenius Analysis yields calculated life after DBA of 74 years.~~

~~1 CP3 7 days 30 days Outside containment 2 CP1 environment only.~~

~~2 CP4 20 days 1 year Arrhenius analysis 1 CP12 calculated life after DBA of 74 years.~~

~~2 CP5 13 days 1 year Arrhenius analysis 1 CP13 yields a conser- vatively estimated life after DBA of 4S years.~~

~~CP7 7 days 30 days Arrhenius analysis yields calculated life after DBA of 74 years.~~

~~CPS 130 days 1 year Outside containment (radiation only environment) aualified for 200 mrads.~~

Items CP1, CP10, and CP12 appearing in Attachment I (also with EPR insulat'ion) need not be justified since the test duration for these items was equal to or greater than the required time of operation. Considering the tests by which these devices have been qualified, the environment in which they will function, and the Arrhenius analysis that have been performed, it is my conclusion that these devices are qualified for their required time of operation. Attention is hereby called to the two items in Attachment I qualified by very short tests (in one instance, without a test). These items are listed below.

~~Plant Test Req'd. unit Itnltl Duration Comments CI-14 No Test 1 day Outside containment environment~~

1,2 TI-10 40 1/2 Hrs. 4 months Outside containment, No radiation environment CI-14 is a crosslinked-Polyethylene (XLPE) insulated cable rated for 190oF used outside containment only. The high Energy Line Break (HELB) environment this cable will see (230 F for 15 secs.) probably will not raise the temperature at the surface of the cable up to its rated 190oF. Also, Bulletin 79-01B appendix C, table Cl allows credit to XLPE insulation for 10 Mrads and 40 years of life. TI-10 was tested for 40 1/2 hours. This test more than demonstrates the ability of the termination to survive the HELB environment outside the reactor containment. Therefore, I conclude that items CI-14 and TI-10 are qualified for their application outside containment. The Kerite Company does not Divulge the Chemical composition of its cable. For this reason. some discussion on why this cable is qualified for its application inside containment is warranted.

Kerite Company cable, summary sheet 5 CP-ll (AEP item ",3127), was qualified bv a 7 1/2 days test. This cable serves the Containment Recirculation Fan (CRF) motor that is required to operate following a LOCA. The LOCA environment at D. C. Cook Plant, as previously discussed, will be 148oF 4g ~xsi~ after 28 hours. The cable was qualified for 325oF for 13 hours and 228oF for 7 days. Radiation qualification amounts to 200 Nrads. Clearly, the cable testing time did not last one year. However, the severity of the test was greater than that of the postulated accident environment since after 28 hours ambient temperature will be well below cable temperature rating. The CRF (Hydrogen skimmer) motors nameplate Full Load Amps (FLA) -is 88 amps. The cable 40 C ambient rating in the D. C. Cook installation configuration is 119 amps. This indicates we have ample margin in this application and do not expect to overheat the cable from its load duty. These motors are not operated during start up, normal plant operation, or shutdown conditions. They are operated only during surveillance testing or after an accident. Cable temperatures will therefore be low, i.e., mild aging conditions. The remainder of the devices, in Attachment I are comprised of materials with good aging characteristics and have been tested for a sufficient length of time (by comparison with the D. C. Cook past-DBA environment profile. Therefore, the general arguments initially developed in this review memo can be readily applied to them. Considering the information included in the qualification summary sheets, where the post-accident environment for the. devices in Attachment. I (except as noted) are presented, the Arrhenius analysis performed for some of these devices, and the engineering review performed herein, I conclude that these devices are qualified to operate in their locations after an accident for the required length of time.

~~F. Caso LFC:mb~~

~~Approved J. M. Intrabartola Attachments~~

~~1. List~ of equipment~ for which the Test Duration was less than the Required~ Time of Operation. 2. Figure I. Water temperature inside D. C. Cook Huclear Plant Post-Accident Reactor Containment~~

3. Figure 14.2.5.«9, FSAR Compartment Temparature. 4., Figure 14.3.4.10, FSAR Design Basis Accident Long Term Temperature Transient. Electrical Penetrations Arrhenius Analysis. Letter of 7/31/81 from C. H. Shih to L. F. Caso. 6. Electrical Cable Arrhenius Analysis. A. Letter of 9/23/81 from E. A. Howard/R. M. Hayes to L. F. Caso. B. Letter of 10/5/81 from L. F. Caso to E. A. Howard. C. Letter of 10/8/81 from E. A. Howard/R. M. Hayes to L. F. Caso. 7.. Input Information for the Performance of the Arrhenius Analysis in Item 6 above: A. Letter of 8/5/81, L. F. Caso to C. H. Shih. B. Letter of 8/7/81, L. F. Caso to C. H. Shih. C. Letter of 8/27/81, L. F. Caso to R. N. Hayes. 8. 'Raychem Corporation Heat Ag'ing Study of NCSF Compound. Report SEDR-2001 o'f 8/10/78. 9. Kerite Cable

~~A. Memo of September. 28, 1982 from L. F. Caso to 79-01B Central File~~

~~B. Letter of September 21, 1982 from N. H. Dube to T. J. Massar. tv ~ ' ~ C vw~~

~~LIE a V)~~

~~Ec( yr44nlL ~ PIM ford ZwJ 4~~

~~ccI C Vi«~~ (.uy) XLPf /qo$ (r/~~ //g (ys Ig qo~ (.s e~s) CC Z- 3]~r /g v~~

~~6 oc 4 EliJ. '(.3»)~~

~~o C,cg qnccoAg (3»og EP/cxpj /cap~ "I/ibye I4~~

~~( ging'8/3.ig XLP~//4 zbfz/~ . I/( br~ Cc( (Pi~jy~~

~~Cc g i3.3) (p>~ iy~~

~~gocj 4o)is (3oc y) )(L/E /Cop E. 3C3 ~'4gr 5 SWC~~

~~S'1$~~

~~Sg~:/>)). i~ (3ogr) Ef~~ cs E /o o. oo . 5o J~g/ f @fill/If cl'C Lo~hgg JX C3o). tin.ta- Z g $ v< (q y„dgr) CZ7 5 Z 4) (3o3sg C3PL/ /g Veil' II( lV'~~~

~~C X'$'.ivo ()o7$~ x LPE/csl''~ 5p )4j~ 4- l/~~

~~5<+oo/ 0/oofy. (3o7$3 E p~o)/egg~ gO 4~j q /l Cr e~ "7 assr Durban~~

~~CX'O Conknw'g ( *o.s)~ J7 /g l,W: 2Zy Ars (s~iL l yr) C7 li t" O>7 II4 3ru~~

~~CX'g GVn~4g (:u(y +(.fs E SSS~-I+ Cskon;f (33.y) gPR/l/~.a fr>»r- I /3'+yg / ~ c egg (okoni%k.yru~) (pA)~~

~f7& +rus /'» g) E/ e/~~.P r~ /bg /~g / m )iA. CPI CPg r>.»»- / unions ( ~,v't. Es~~~ (~~y) ~PR/us uf p jJp cp l~ c'/s 'go I Ar ) I UJ 4'f7 gag /cuP< un(a I JAgu u/c c /'0 Cp+ /~c.~» (3+j) EPI~P~ 2./ u~,ti l3 s(y~ I )leg c.p( Onion'f~ (3yyp s>/'.~ r.si(~//au/if.i Is~ I/r g rn,.f/, (Olla//Qvlh//~QJ/ J)

~~CP J yuS 3/~~ E/j/'/C s/36 2- C/(j~™p lbS'r<~~

~~/'pC cga (jkunif» Qlu~g cs E- u ei I fP os) I3og~ ~-k->. d/-~-/..) (~~

~~, .„,7 3okyz~~

~~gr] y) Kst~~

~~ls'Y7re( J>asr sf'>' ('&inPg oriQs I/vs )('g g f]~g~~

~~CP// ger,(+ (3( ig) /(1( /Fr(' / bor- / CP(( ~, ) (S(/4) /g ass cps C ( z o cr So / P g g ~~ (3( ig. p(/cg p< 2~ dies ~J/~~

~~F I 0/+g7i ((J $ s (ex~. f< ~ Cc. R~ F I 2 /90 lgpz ( poor vn.A~ 2~ / fg ~ Ag /Igf q,~~i.yh J"> . g r (J„rr,)l~~

~~7CC S/4/ic ig /-"/'rluP //4 3(s o(ass gr S (J'c rsr () ji'~ 7C y SP (~ F/-oh/. ((4 l) rs p( roo(Co~jr /)~~

~~7 C f 5P//4 g~ Pro), / ox>+ (~/- )/~~

~~IIC fr5 >n. (jr Wnlg ( ln'J ~ y 4 >r~drltkr p )~~

~~Pf WZ/o . 6x 4 vo Z~]r. ~ r/ >> Pi r»~~

~~/ P / Sp j> Lc >» F/ >/v/>~ (/ >»r dv3~~

~~7P ~ 5jafj~ >> P'l~rlug br>,v (p r~qv)~~

7 I/O lCy~>npi r».s n.7 /r» />r~ y //p a'r /acr~ TP< '7rv >r>»'g'r»r».7. v n< %71~ rV~ ev 70~$ ~dkVJ f~ lilfulAAIA. l F/All/>~ p/l~ ~K 5p'~~ d~c~"- ~~ I hr ~ )YCVW /K5II/~fdic .g Qg+~ lf)/4~ C. 7~ijj ~ y ~v '. $ /~~ k~ ~~ ]@~ 1 E be x p VcLc u u vn ~, L~~

~~Jog- $ *ric z. wi~/~ M~M ~~Ed+ ZwcowA-- COO z~~i/~~ g.o s$ ~ &l n / (« /pe Jn~ (g C.g c'~(rv ) J4 J \ L~~

~~~P Q AlA 4t~)~~A 7~g g C~~ /ggy/g/I'~ $~~

~~5'~ Split &naia /~L ~ Pap.~ AJC <~~pa~~~ ~ ~~ g~~ p~ A~-~~ Zfu4~p Egg- Z oo/,~~

~~$ r ~a('Per I ~fLt 8 /) ~~ ~ v~~~

~~c.~g/~ s />'~~~

~~g7 ~/M~~

~~\ ~al~..h r ~i y 4 S ~ ~~~ /~~ MrV~ s'co/el @ az pap~. y- @~~p v;,'~ 9 j-~~

~~e r ~~~

~~e s~~

~~~ 'e ~ ~ & ~ ~ « ~ ' ~~~

' 'I ~ h. ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I . ~ 1 1 I e 43-' 4r . ~ 1 r ~ .).t .j)ot',.~~.~~+. I e I 1 1 e I I I I ~ I I I ,'P;k'f ~ e" ) 'e ac.4~,g~ w.z' e ~ I I e e ~ i 1 I; 1 3 L ~ I Rl 1 e e ~ e ~ e ~ I I i ~ .1 ~ 1 i: ~ 1 . g ~ } ~ e L$ ~ e ~ l, } j f i ~ I ~ 1 e t: Xf'g h -132 7 e ~ e ~ l ~ e I e - 1 1 e I } I ~ ~ e e "'t 1'"} -I ~ e ~ e ~ I 1 I, ..L. 4 1

e e <---"l- S.RJ . rim 1 e ~ .~th e e e I e I L ~ -I e ~ e } e I, } e f I t ", ':., ~ ~ R .1 "} '1 I 1 'i" el e, I I -I-" i 1 ~ h e 1 ~ ~ ' l e e ~ 1 1 e 1 .J -I I 1' -.- e.",. ~ .. e ~ ~ I ~" ~ i}r & I' e" ' 1 1 e e e g4Q t ~ I I 1* ~ ~ „I- ~ ~ I t 1 1 lf3 1 e e I ~ e ~ e e Rl - ~ ' L I I e 1 i e l e } 1 1 ~ l I) I ~ - il4---~ I;. - r-» -) I 1 ~ ~ 1 . e , }- L,.. ~ . I . ~ I ~ l I l+ I 1 ! RI }„I i" » .l .L..' l .} I- — I f l~- DCC v trr I&q».J r tasih ~t='' y S»}sheen

~~1 j 1 , ~ 1 e ~ e- I Ig ~ h ~ I ~ ' e ~ I I I ~ ~ I 1 i-I i ~ ~ ~ [„> -.~ -e--1— e 1 1 ~ ' ~ ~ e e e I I i~~

~~~ ~ - 1 1 I ~ ~ 1 e e e 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~ -~ y- I-g--3 I f- -) I "I- ~ ~ 1 t-! e ~ e I & ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~~

e . 1. ")'I e e 1 l I 1 e ~ I 1 v ~ 1 e,e ~ I ~ I 1 ~ 1,e -f -'i I i 1 1 e As of the time of this update (July, 1982), no figure for the 4.6 ft2 break is available. It is expected to include such figure in a future update. However, as Table .14.2.5-4 indicates, the differences between NIN STEAN LINE BREAK the'.4 ft2 and the 4.6 ft2 breaks results DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT FSAR are small. l3370-I

~~%00 OOUSLE-EHOEO BREAK, I % FT , l02p POWER, 0/0 AUX FEED FAl NRE, NRST LARGE BREAK~~

~~SPRAY TURHS OH BECK FAHS TURN ON~~

~~2 '' g 200 LOWER COMP ARTHEHT '5 .1 ~ . ~ I (~~

~~UPPER CCHPARTMEHT~~

~~0—-'-IQO 200 300 %00 600 600 700 800 900 V~~

~~~ ~ ~ Figure 14.2.5-9 Compa'~ent Temperatur'e l~~

~~July, 1982 ~ C 220 DESIGH BASIS ACCII)FHT (VHIFORH FLOP DISTRIBUTIOH TO ICE OED CASE)~~

~~200~~

~~LOITER COIIPARTHEHl ISO~~

~~'o 160 Ul Pc R COIIPARTIIEHT~~

~~STAGHAHI p iUIIP ACIIVE - «Iqo SUIIP i5~~

~~UPPER COHPARt'uEHT I20 SPRAT TEliPERATURE RESIDUAL.SPRAY TEIIPERATURE~~

~~I00 SUIIP RECIRCULATIOH STARTS~~

~~80 IO .. I00 l000 I0,000 I00.000 I,000,000 J' TfhIE (SECOtlDS)~~

~~~ ~ I ~ ~ ~~~

~~Fjqul e 14.3.4.10 Design Oosis Acci(lenl Long Term Temperature Tionsienl ~ ~ ~ II K.:> p)Q AN Eg I AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION~~

~~OWER oiTF:. July 31, 1981 ~~ g~c,uM 8 g~ 5v5IE'Raw 5UBJEcTt Electrical P enehrations wR-A~A~ 5~~

~~C. H. Shih~~

~~TO- L. F. Caso~~

According to the Arrhenius equation described in your letter to me dated July 17, 1981, C. W. Yi has estimated the life time equivalence. His memo is attached. It contains a detailed analysis, using both the Arrhenius equation, and the so-called "10 degree C" rule. As one can see, both predicted long life times. The 1.1 year time required is well exceeded. A few observations are made as follows:

1. The 10 C rule is far more conservative than the Arrhenius prediction. Using the coefficient of 19718, one would find that 0 at around 100d F, the life time is halved for every 10 C increase of temperature. It can be shown that below such a temperature leve', the Arrhenius equation gives a much longer equivalent life. 2. The long life (10 18 hours) predicted by the Arrhenius equation does not have any practical significance. The result simply means that the material should last indefinitely at 106.5 F. This is not a surprise be- 'cause this post accident temperature is not a high temperature. (only about 40 F above room temperature). Even ordinary material snould not "fail" at this temperature. 3. The Ar~henius equation itself predicts a longer time, 3 x 10 9 hours. Since the IPS-326 and 327 tests were not performed till the material failed, the t~o'tests did give a relatively shorter life time equivalence, 2 x l0 hours. The life time equation is expressed in logarithm. It is supersensitive to tempe ature. As the equation shows that at 340 F, the mate ial would last less than one day. On the other hand, at room temperature 68 F,,it would last 10 4 hours. L. F. Caso July 31, 1981 Page 2

~~Chin has the detailed computer printout and is familiar with the computational procedure. Should you need more help, please call him or me.~~

~~'~'. H. Shih CHS: jll Attachment ceo S ~ H Horowitz w/attachment B. J. Ware C. W. Yi T. E. King 4~ s A p~~

~~AMERICAN ELECTRIC POY/ER SERYICE CORPORATION .~~

~~+WER ssy&~< ~A~~

~~Ta:~ July 30, 1981~~

~~5UBJEcTz EquivalentE Age Calculations o f D. C. Cook Plant Electrical Penetrations~~

~~FROMM C. H. Yi~~

~~TO- C. H. Shih~~

Zn response to L. F. Caso's memos of July 16 and 17, 1981, the equivalent age of the D. C. Cook Plant electrical penetrations is calculated based on the given Arrhenius equation and the temperature profiles of ZPS-326 and IPS-327 tests and of reactor containment during the post-accident period. From the mathematical viewpoint, if a certain test is conducted at temperature Tl and the material fails afte" Ll hours, then the equivalent life at reference temperature T can be derived as follows: f (B/T-C) If L = 10 is given, then — L = L 10 (1/T 1/Tl) ref 1 f where L = expected life in hours B, C = constants, 19718 and 43.208 respectively T = absolute temperature in i(elvin Thus, if the test is conducted for htl hours, the equivalent age at reference temperature will be:

~~Equi. Age = htl 10 - ref 1~~

~~= B ( 1/T —. 1/T' . ) Tota'qui. Age i=1.E ht. 10 'ef~~

~~With the given temperature profiles of ZPS-326 and ZPS-327 tests, then the equivalent ages of the subject material at 106.5 F are as follows: Test Duration Totzl Equivalent Ace~~

ZPS-326 202 hours 2. 92 x 10 hours (3. 33 x 10 9 years) ZPS-327 24 hours 2.08 x 10 hours (2. 3 I x 10 years) Combined 226 hours 2.08 x 10 hours (2.37 x 10 years) IHT RA-SYSTEM C. H. Shih July 30, 1981 Page 2

To illustrate the validity of above calculations, let' consider the test lasted for one hou- at 340 F as indicated at the beginning of IPS-327 test: -Expected life at 340 F (444.1 K) = 15..56 hours A e of one hour 1 Expected life T5.56 0643 0 18 and, the equivalent age at 106.5 0 F (314.4 K) = 2.07 x 10 hours. 0 19 Expected life at, 106.5 F = 3.22 x 10 hours 18 Equivalent a e 2.07 x 10 0643 Expected life 3.22 x 1019 Thus, both calculations show agreement although the total equivalent ages at 106.5 F for both tests are astronomical. Furthermore, it can be shown that the contribution in aging by the one hour exposure at 340 F is 'dominant as shown below: E uivalent a e at 106.5 F for 1 hour test at 340 F Total equivalent age from IPS-327 test 18 2 07 x 10 995 2.08 x 10

To examine the case further, a widely used 10 C rule is applied to calculate the equivalent ages —that is, for every increase of 10 C, the life of material is halved. he results are shown below: Total Equivalent Age at 106.5 F nZ 2(T. T )/10) Test Duration ( i=1~t.i IPS-326 202 hours 9190 hours (1.05 years) IPS-327 24 hours 10910 hours (1. 25 years) Combined 226 hours 20100 hours (2.29 years) 0 Also, the equivalent age for the one hour exposure at 34C F 8020 hours 0 Eauivalent ace at 106. 5 F 8020 Total ecniva ent age from 99- 27 test 109'0 735 C. H. Shih July 30, 1981 Page 3

Again, the age contribution by the one hour exposure at 340 P to the total equivalent age at 106.5 P is dominant as shown above. Although the 10 C rule is not equivalent to the Arrhenius equation, it can be a good approximation to it over a limited temperature range. As a conclusion, the equivalent age of the electrical penetrations exceeds well beyond 1.1 year criteria based on the Arrhenius method with. the given temperature profile information of IPS-326 and IPS-327 tests. If you have ques tions, pleas e let me know.

~~CHY:jll l~ AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION~~

~~OWER SYSTG~~

~~OATEs September 23, 1981 > !' C ~ 'Iv Pi» oft 0 3 SUSiECTs ArrheniuS AnalySiS /pe-aJ ~~~~

~~FROMs E. A. Howard/R. M. Hayes~~

~~Tos L. F. Caso~~

Enclosed is a revised list of the devices and their calculated lives at Tset = 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Listed are those numbers which produced the shortest life at the LOCA Profile given. Also enclosed are printouts'f all LOCA and Test Profiles used. Figures 1 and 2 are examples of how two of the six LOCA Profiles were reached and the other four were done in the same manner. Test Profile data came from previously given data from your office. These data files are similarly created and stored on the computer. The ARAN program used to do the calculations and an explanation of it should already be in your possession. If you need further information or more detailed documentation, please contact me in Columbus at extension 1054.

~~F' ~~~Jng Ql~ ~ coul& ' ) E. A. Howard y, ~~ g ii~'p«t+~~

~~Hayes I EAH/RMH:311 Attachments cc: C. H. Shih C. Yi~~

~~IHT RA SYSTEM r1 v» T r~~

<@93 C Z L22.. i.Z' ~z>O 8- 2- +e I 2 7 rC 7 C ooo" cj 1. ~ Z 055 C. ~ h ooo" v 5 2 LZ,c.'I ZL F59 ) -'15 ~i 4 QOO CZ $ .. 2. L2.2 ~ 2L $ OQ) 38~ 4 oOo" w j 'Lz z.R.z. L 'Pbbs)34+, Z2." / e P s v4> 2 ) 8 00) Z Q 8 oooo' e 3 LZ Z.~.Z,L s I I ooo c.P~ I t Z Z.'t.2 L 1 1 4. / o bo oo QP 5. 2- Z ~ l ~ z, L P3 2 / I (oooc cE r.3 L- X Z.5.Z i. 2) o<< bog / g &Q 00 CP 't-Z L z 2.9 Z.'- peg 0 q / | Z 2 Lz Z..'I.ZL, 1 z g oooo" ) / oooo" T T l LZ 2-'l.2l 0 " 0 520 l a C~,o oQ cp ZO Lz 2.. t.~ L 1, +2>, & ooo" . Z,. 1.Z. L 7 2 3 /Q F 1 2 L,P 1 ) ~08 / 7 0 09 H 2 ~ 2, ) Z 2..5 Z.L r ) 4 ooo 5. 2 LZZ,.'t aL 8+ ) 224 / Ci -'~o oc TP LZ2.$ .Z L ZQ5'

~~+ Qgl g ared cj 5 8< 855v~cd 3~~

~~~5$ Wt o't s ) Q. C 0~~

C.Z z. Z. Z, - 2, '- Z 8 -2.; T Z. X - S ', 7 Z. 2. - 8 C,|: K-2. 5- 2 c.r S "z 'Z.9 2; Z" -a; T z-'-; C w0.z. c z+-z.; c.z io-z. n-,5 ~ 'PL.. 2 C PL-2.. C -Z. -2. ) Fz ) cP4 2 CZ9" > Y K 7 —+- CZs g) ) ) i7 2-/ jV j ~P 11.. z, CF11-Z cp ~g.~ cP 15 2. CE6. ~ c.) + - 3 -2, <~f. 2. cd% — < m -z., S,+ i r.z.-,E,4; a- ~, 3 q -3, > Yz. L.5 > F~c c Pho 2 '.1. 2 H3-Z

~~a Q ~ Q ' p 3 ~ 2 ) P~ -2. ) T>E-2 j >FZ-8 PS "3. P~~

~~/g ~ ~~~

k 2 1 l.LU Tr22 9 1U '. QQ:4.5»-J~ La<& fry'hc. z,a,. too e 1.0 + -- 3 OQ PA-XaW p+< ~oQ hlO F, 4b ~14 e -'i3I > ~ 22 -~0r" 400 C $ 10 311, L)O W> 1 ++('' 1&o e '. 120 .00'9,-60972 F) 5S sec 10o F.> 130 t1 20 O ~5a a,ec IC I ~ Ug 340

~~REM)Y ~ 'T~g~ ~'22 n~~

~~e( Prol')c. Lzz .'I 'll :22 ~ '.". ~: '.... /22lo, 8~~

1 "0 l OO loII ««I'«A«go 105 I 55 1 lo F, +o mrs toS Wa q <+e ',OG Lo& 3oo F za sec. ~ ( 0 I ) .0058) i lo ) l Z.b 22e4)~P ) 5po g~c ~ I ~ I 2o T'>, A%3 1 LEO iS< 'P, ~ ( «I,;1 lBoY ) @he 888.>z. se,c ",-:;9 32t.63 0 Z,o

~~e I Ahp~4 i~ m&C) a +hC.~~

~~~~22.~-2V 00"4659~ Og/2Z/Sf Loge Prot)'-BC; lZZ,.8,2.U(, iso + "-' ."-3 ~I. o('oko. L ) "50430 + oP LLO F, +0 pre 1<' lo5 Yw, <+A 0 sec 'ZO 309) ~ 15 1 hS~ 4 %4, 4,ap 1g0 0™g„.1111 SCo CW,OO~~

~~'Q,41I TA ~ O ~~~

~~~ Q~~

4@ ' C ~ IL'.), o OI /,1 «(. LOO + lo5 Lg o'P +O 1s 105 »6 .33,3'50400 ioK >e, 4+~ l t 0 3>o'P ~o sec 110 , .0167 $ 50 +w +4 (= >a.o Z.~ W'SIIooo 1 'PA ~f1 WZo r %3o 'Yg l Qb lZC) F 5 rO /I T 5 1 ~ g ~ (

at3- 3 U'e'+<":O. 6O/22/S~ ~'~+~ tnt t) loO <<%@aha lao 4 l OS > >O4F +O q~S '05 3> i>,H"LOG (O5 Ta ) «A ) ~ A ~ r pr (++ l d 8. 4F j «8 '5 '5Q(4 " l IE,c} t K+ F ) 9, ec, : 20 . $24 s. «002$ ( lsS I a~ O'P, Z.O Sac. p ~r( t~O 2C, OO55. l'50 g~ d4y g no( ( r ~ r ~ r v g 1 y " + r l 5" "-91,.25 +) )pd 82.+ F iOOS( ( I 50 Y's) Ling '..3 321.33 'l2o4 +herc. 13 ~Q ~T$~'IPf„ p-.t~p a~ ~~~g ')n,Wr5; AI ~ > ~ ~

~~te ~ r p LOC.e 9fZ;« iiZ.ii ~ ~ + ~at~~

~~QP,3 $ l o5 Yg) ++0, lo5 l lO F) +Oqfs i) 0 b+1 'l 1 ~t 1 ( 0 Z3I.Z 9, go ref g( ) J l 3b P~~ >5c lZ.c r 4 r +Kg ~4%7 1% hf5~~

~~1 03~~~

~~EO %4 (~I C( 0 T4 I((IC,3~~

l ZZ.R- )U a .~.i Co .-Ye (,U @ I(( L, Z.Z.. R. 5 L Carr( ) ~ Wl o'I C L Z.Z..5 . 2.Q u.t- O 2.9.2. Ca~ .7~ CUo (-C ii'41 L zz,. S. 2-l- o .9.Z C. ~ |.'l- T19 Ir o'c z, Lh Q. LU Wicrmt e. 'l '3 ~ ~' Co ~~ L4'5,- hL a~~r C.

~~l53l~~

~~3 4 ~4Q ™g72~~

~~~y Q 11 h g«h" %. vT) o3~~

~~~ - ~ Q«,~~

~~;~~~ 16~~

~~Ptvk 18 4 ««+8~~

~~.:.~$1c. Qz g4 6~~

~~~ 2~~

~~i Q Mf}, js+~~

~~Q 41 ~ «r 141 6~~

~~Vt « Q r $'ll 1 5 ''7 d ha«h~~

~~h'h Q «~~

~~1 ~ W ~ I t C'ji-'-'c „«fh!E'g ~ 1 \1»~~

~~'1 ~~~

~~: ~ 1»7'"Tiw 1 ~ ~ 1~~

~~«») y'7 g ~ r~~

~~Q. Qi16~~

~~Q ri~~

~~%»s~,s)~~

~~, » I h i~~

~~A»"..'-'.A~~

~~I]l 2l~~

~~g Q $ A I ~ C j/i » »1 M'' »1~~

~~«~r„ ~ j»~~

~~1 ~, ~,I rt oft a J C ~ -„-~-'r.,'' ~ ) 8 C~~

~~' 0 Y ~TO ,qkl ~ g'''Er' ~ :.. qC i)i~ ~ ~~~

~~3 og,) ~o /g,;/.~~ wJ e ~ s + ~ ~ )f C Z,t,2. '00'2' q g.( $ 1 Q. 416,0 2 7'7'7 w 'l~~

~~~ ~ ~ 5 l,y'~. d 7 ~T."- CXg 2 8 'j~~

~~C T.p ~ 2 1 ~ 252~.') -"~~

~~12 13 )$ Q 14 129 Llg>,a- n~~

~~e L LES ~7',.2~~

~~Q '22m ~ ~ g /~ y ( c.Z.4.. 2.~~

~~Q2 1.10 4~N~2 ? I Q I3 t I~~

~~II I...".Z5. 2 Q N2~~

~~I ~ Q~~

~~~f< gf) gQ'7 $ nn 4a~~

~~'t=r'4 ~21 ~a~ g% "> l I Q~ O'CC' .70 CPU PjQ~Q PA l Q >0 '7 g il o I'.", * '~~

~~'52I~~

~~io Pf r„p~ .~ 1o)CvP 1~~

~~Q 2 3~~

~~~ ')0 -T~~~

~~h 'E I ( Pt ( h ~ I . ~ VL~~

~~,( n Pic>u.re. l I;I rr- 'I,II LZZ..'l.) L e >y 'I»r»I,OrI rl00 OOVbLK CNO(O ARRAN,~~

~~I ~ I Fl ~ lOZ„PONER, rr/0 AVA FERRO FAIUIAK> » 5r>o "c . +N.I.9>l "a '> NORNT LaRGC bACAX i Q7)() ',ogle ~~~

~~btbbf 'lvAN5 or OECR flrrb IVAN ON~~

~~I> O W g 200 Orr CON RFH I> l5 Ibl IF -Vr>> Kxb F = '>lp. v ER Plbfr T~~

~~I00~~

~~0 ~ ~ Iboo >too >5oo II»oo 17»o 0 loO 2CO 300 >ICO 500 e TOO eCO S~ A T lb~ . {SEC0005)~~

~~Fi>„"~rv C22.9. l Ccrrrpann>:rrr T>:rnpvroluro~~

~~~ » >rlIK>r,>l», ~ > l>arIh, let»~~

~~250 I ti7 "I':! el I Ill(;il'!1 1„ ~ 1 ~ ~ ( ei I," I II . I le I jl ;jl ~ lif iile 'I I:,'") ~ fl 'ee i, ( '' ~ :''ll I I Il ,l!'. J-';, ( ~ ( : II [L'. I~~

~~fr I.I i!i O)i.i:I Q;e)l I ~ II ! ~ ~ I['j )il: llf N (I I [ll ! jI!'ee'i I;( l ~ i;I;. 'III ~ "I,'i,'I I)) I I )i)i ~ I~~

e( ~ ~ (' I ii': fi'"Ill'If ~ Ill If! e ( ;" I t;: ~ ~ ~ ~ I li:-: I e "I; )I!i II, e il 'h. l (I e I If,I I ~ ~ I e rt j'I'I' e ~i. nfl 200 e 1:)I Ii. jiff I I ', le f ',:i')j( I 'il. (.i I'e ': ~ e :I: I" :)ll ~ ~ ~ e 'I..:: i, e i:i I(l', el' [Ijl III.'iI

~ ~ ~ 1 [l .sI .'.. lf I ',', Ice I e ~ ~ I . 'l ~ - I fill I e'j, ;(i'iji il(i III: ~ ~ I I I» :;, II>'..I eli I ~ I 11}) III I I i ~ ~ e ~ ~ I ~ I '.i "ii ~ ( ~ ~ 'e .f( ~ ei I ill; lii e I e,le ~ ( ~ gj fll e I 'I 150 j'f'i I'ill Tl! III; ! If)( I'i) le ~ ~ ~ I I ,'); j)l( el ) ! ! I) ~ ~ I ' ! '" lti, I Ii ~ I: I, I'll i)i 'f I ~ /g7 e 'I'e ! e (I ~ ==. ite le ))( /r ff— "1!I- ,e I lll: I (, e e I I ~ ( ,:I'' e jlj ( ~ ~ ' e' ;I il I .I I ~ I ii'I ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ jl e I ~ :i I e I '

~~I :II~~

~~e e~~

~~e ~ ~ ~ '15 el ~ La I 01 1.0 1 .0 TIIIE (SEC) i'llle 1:.I'l-I r ~ roc. o >.oV )<~~

~~Ll3 - IQ~~

~~0( ~ pop'g 70/+~~

~~~ O OO c ~~ l~ y. I~~

~~A4Z .oo~5 L~- ~l )z-g,y "p = axe K. = Tg ~ 1>s a'r- = '~ "-'-'~~

~~C C> p C.~~

I fr)nO Computer Program ARAN Arrhenius Analysis of remaining life of a component after a thermal shock. The Arrhenius Equation is of the form B A T Life = 10 where T = an exposure temperature (absolute scale) . By testing a material at various temperatures, T., for various amounts of time, dt , accelerated thermal aging occurs. To compare aging

at j'ates different temperatures, B A Life at Tl = L(T1) = 10 1 (2) —B — A 2 Life at T2 = L( 2) = 10 so, testing at T2 for time dt2 gives an eauivalent aging dtl at Tl such that B ( —- A) 1 1 T B(—- —) 10 Tl T2 dtl = dt2 dt2 ~ 10 (3) ( —- A) T2 10 Zf we use one reference temperature, T, to compare agp.ing at any other temperature and then test the material at n temperatures T, each for a time dt, then the eauivalent life at reference temperature, T

n 1 — 1 B(—T T.—) L(T) = Z dt.. 10 o (4) j—1 3 if the material is then subjected to some temperature profile, such as a normal operation followed by a LOCA, aging occurs, which will shorten the remaining life at T0 . The remaining T = L life at 0 r (T)0 1 - 1 N B(—T —T. ) L (T) =L(T) - Z ~t.. 10 o r 0 0 7=..1 7 where N = the number of temperature steps from the time the material was first installed unti3. the end of the LOCA. After the LOCA, the temperature settles down to some TSET, and the remaining life at TSET, for'safety reasons, must be known. N 1 1 ~vsse L (TSET) = Lr(T ) - 10 o (6)

T Program ARAN calculates the expected life at 0 by looking at a test temperature profile performed by the manufacturer and converting this accelerated aging to equivalent life at T . The LOCA prof'3.e is then converted, one step at a time, into equivalent life at T0 . If the LOCA profile equivalent life at T0 exceeds the test profile equivalent life at T at any step, a message will be displayed indicating failure during LOCA.

3:f not, the remaining life at T0 after the LOCA will be converted to life at the settled temperature, and this will be displayed. The mentioned LOCA profile is to include the time before an actual LOCA (i.e., the material may have operated, for 10 years at some average temperature T ), then a set of temperatures (T7', dt ) during a LOCA, then sett3.ed down to TSZT. ARM prints out the expected life at TSET, un3.ess ailure occurs before or during the LOCA.

~~Using ARAN: The program reauires three inputs from the user: 1. The test temperature 'profile 2. The LOCA temperature profile 3. The Arrhenius Parameter, B.~~

~~1. The Test Temperature Data File: The user creates a test temperature data file which will give ARAN the necessary information to establish total life at~~

~~T . This looks like:~~

~~100 NOT 110 Tl, htl 120 T2( ht 130 T3, where NOT = Total number of temperature steps during the test.~~

~~Each set of (T, ht ) goes on one line, and the las t line~~

~~of the data file contains T~~

2. The LOCA Temperature Data File; I The user also creates a LOCA temperature data file, giving ARAN information about the temperature history of this material, from installation through LOCA to the settled temperature, TSET. 100 NOL

~~110 TA( htl~~

~~120 T2 ( ht2 130~~

Last e r I tr r NOL = Dumber of temperature steps to which the mate ial is subject. Each set of (T., ht.) goes on one line. The 3 3 1st (TA, ltA), is the Average Temperature before the LOCA and the time of operation before the LOCA. The rest are the LOCA temperature profile, broken into disc ete steps. o T = K, 6t = hours. 3. The Arrhenius Parameter, B. By staged temperature tests, the manufacturer establishes the Arrhenius Parameters A & B (see Eq. (1) ) . Because we are relating time at one temperature to time at another tempe ature, the Parameter A drops out and only B is needed Qq. (3),) . t

~~OWER SYSTEM~~

~~E October 5, 1981 ' $ o ~ g t'. p suaaacT: Arrhenius Analysis for D. C. Cook Plant ~ Class XE Cable~~

~~L. F. Caso TO! E. A. Howard — Columbus~~

As per our telephone, conversation of 10/2/81, attached find the post-accident temperature profile outside the reactor containment to be ~~~ on the Arrhenius analysis for cable CZ-4. EI>M Attached also find Arrhenius plots for cables CI-3, CX-9, and CP-12. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.

~~L. F, Caso APPROVED ~ 4 M.~~ZNT ARTOLA J. / cc, R. Hayes — Columbus S. H. Horowitz T. E. King~~

~~IHT RA SYST 6Li rc 1 10 TEMPERATURE AT 10 SECONDS IS 230'F~~

~~t1RlfI STEAN STOP YALVE CLOSES~~

~~0 0 .20 0, 2 4 6 T1WE AFTER DnEAV (SECO«ns) Firjijre 0-27 liest Steam Enclosure Hain Steam I i»» Pr» il: (I lrment 3). P> rsstn'c v .. lime ~ >I~~

~~+v a a -0(IM CE b SHEET ENGINEERING DEPT, DATE BY ~ /AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERYICE CORP. ' COMPANY G.O ~ BROADWAY PLANT HEW YORK~~

~~U JEC- Extra olation to FSAR Fi Of i. ' I I I: » j a a i I I I I ~ a i ~L I I » i ' I I ( I ~ I I,, ~ I I 3 ' ~ I I ( ~ '. ' [ / ( i I I~~

~~I ~ I a t i i a~~

~~a ~ ( ~ 1 a I a 3 I:I I I I I a I~~

~~t a i a I a I ( I i a a I a I ~ ~ a a I a i I ( I a I a I a i ~ ' I ( I 3 !;I~~

~~i a ~ a ( I I a a~~

~~( t I a a~~

~~~ I I I ~ I I a~~

~~a ( I a »~~

~~~ t ~ i ~ I I I I~~

~~~ ( i I a a a J I I (~~

~~a a I a ~ ~ ( I a~~

~~I I i I I~~

~~I I I (— a a ' I ~ a I:, ! I j L3) I I I I~~

~~t a I ~ a I I (~~

~~a I » ( ~ 't ~ I I~~

~~» a~~

~~» I ~ LONG-TIME AGING DATA rr~~

~~/ LONG TINE AGING DATA~~

IEEE-383-1974 and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Guide 1.131 require that aging data be developed to establish the long-term performance characteristics of an insulation. A suggested method for accomplishing this is the Arrhenius technique which consists of placing insulation samples in an air oven for var'ious times at elevated temperatures and measuring the change in a significant insulation property (usually elongation). The time to reach a predetermined value of elongation is then plotted on semilog graph paper vs the reciprocal of absolute temperature in degrees Kelvin. An analysis of the Arrhenius data should demonstrate that the insulation will provide a service life at its normal rated operating temperature (90'C) commensurate with the design life of the installation. This latter figure is no~lly taken to be 40 years.

~~Rome has developed Arrhenius aging data on the insulation compounds~~

~~for generating station applications and this data is shown'ecommended~~

' on the accompanying Arrhenius plot. Time to reach 50% of original elongation was selected as the basis for the aging plot. Tests on insulation compounds with 50% retained elongation indicate that both the physical and electrical properties are more than adequate for satisfactory performance, thus the test criteria are very conservative and provide a considerable margin of safety. In developing the Azzhenius plot for Rome-EPR and Rome FR-XLP insulations it was noted that ext apolating the plots to operational temperature ratings results in considerable discrepancies in terms of life. In fact, the extrapolated life obtained is less than actual proven operating experience of older insulations still in service today. This apparent paradox is one of the subjects currently being studied by an IEEE Working Group which has been created to evaluate long time aging characteristics of insulation compounds.

~~Other ways to evaluate the concept of aging are addressed in the~~

~~Supplement of the Forward of IEEE Std. 323-1974 which was issued in~~

November, 1975. A portion of this Forward reads as follows: "It is acknowledged that the state-of-the-art regarding aging for some Class IZ equipment is more advanced than others. It is expected that known technoLogy will be used in any aging program. Optionally (and partic- ularly where the stateof-the-azt is limiting), aging as pazt of the, qualification program may be addressed by operating experience, analysis, combined, or ongoing qualification". This Supplement acknowledges that aging, as part of a qualification program, may be addressed by operating experience, analysis, type tests and/or any combination of these methods. t 4

To assist in its aging cyalification program, Rome has obtained cable with But l rubber i'n s ulati.on that was removed from service after 15 years of operation. Analysi's of the condition of the insulation shows that it has lost an insignificant amount of its original tensile strength and elongation indicating that the cable xs'blcap e of providing many more years of service. Other cables with Butyl rubber insulation have been identified in servicese and are stall providing satisfactory performance in electric utility generating stations after more than 20 years

~~Again referring to the accompanying graph, data obtained from the same~~

Butyl rubber corn po und formulation as used on the aforementioned cables is also shown as an Arrhenius plot. Examination of the curves shows that the new Ro me-EPR and Rome PR-XLP insulations take greater than I 7 times and 5 times longer respectively, to reach 50% retention of original elongation than does the Butyl insulation compound. On the basis of this corn parison'ndand the proven operating experience with Butvl rubber, it is logical to e xpect a life of over 40 years for Rome-EPR and

~~Rome FR-XLP insulations under normal operating conditions. P a ~ . - ~ '" «1 ~',' «1~ 7» app 4 'al- «Ci~«pa»ad 't' '"~ ~ %' '-: '«~~

~~dA =. t gP'V 4 7/2r CA,LF ' I ~ ~ 1 9 r s 1 AZgEtE5lZll5 PZ8 7.: 6~~

~~~ ~ 5 I I~ I a ~ I ~...I ~ I I 1 I c7sV52PtrP Eld'gag I't i \ ~ [, j»~~

~~I 1 C» I ~ .. I. 'aa'.L. I ~ ~ ~ 1»' ~ ,i i, ~ !,1 ~ I I" ~ i I ~ P'f I s I: i ! I ~ ~ f'' I a L&QC)dO ~ I I .t ~ C ~ 9 ~ IL.. ~ ~ I I I i I I C I I » 1 !P:. I I I I" I »~~

~~5 C ~ » I' I I 1"'a Ir ~ ~ ~ I ( 1 c t C » .-! I frf I I ~ I LC I I ' "= I"= 1 i I I "f I'I :' i"i I o 5~~

~~C4 ~ J » C '' ~ ~ I I P ~ Z I' I ~ ~ '» ~ l. I 1 I:$;L~'.)p ~ ~ t P 'i i . ~ I~~

r t ~ ' »1 ~ 1 ~ » P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .(.1 ~.. ~ I C ~ ~ 1 ~ L. ~ ~ ~ ~ ' tod 00 I ~ 9 ~, I I ~ ~ I ~ I I ~ I ~ I C' 4 ~ i ~ P ~ ~ c I 1, l I '-:t.'.! i I .i ~: ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ c 1' I ~ I ' I I . ~ I l I ~ i I I, I i : ! i.i. I! »

) ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ = I ~ ~ I L' I ~ ~ CL t" ~ ~ I ~ ~ I s a O L '» 1 OOO ' 9.. a ~ ~ . I a X I 1 1 ~ ~ I ~ I ' 5 I ~ l I ~ I I rst 4 I ~ ~ I P s I" c. ~, ~ ' (at I I I .I i 7., i. ' '. ~ Q I I 6. I 4 ~ I i g I ~ '! i: ':;. I I 5 cc 1 ~ » I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I s I ~-;- Oo o; I'» «C ::» ~ II ~ ri I 'i! C I as I (I c»I I,. 4 as'4 Og i'"I ' A as ~ 4 ra P c ~ ~ -' ~ ~ g I-'r ' rat Car » a Cct r ~ I ~ ~ l 1 I ~ i ~ a » ~ ~ LO I 9 a I 8 1 ~ I ~ I 1 ' I Is:I ~ I:.Il!'! I i I I I ~ ~ i ' ~ C ~ 1 . » I C

~~1 ~ ...' I a~~

~~~ I ~ I i ~ i»l l.. ~ ~ ~ .Soc. 3.3 /I P L'~~

Aging is a phenomenon that all materials inevitably are confronted with. Just as some people "age" at ditterent rates, different materials "age" at different rates. when oosed with the problem of aging a material to a 40-year equivalent life condition, the i r st determination to be made is at what rate does the ma«erial age; 'One acceotable method of determinin~ this is to age th material at a minimum. of three temperatures, one of which is 136oC and the other two a least 10 C apart (r r. IE=E Std. 383-1974, Paragraph 2.3.2). The resultant retention ot elongation data can then be evaluated using t!ie Arrhenius technique. This technique will supply an equation wi h a defined slope, or rate of change, depicting time (to loss of elongation) versus -emperature. Once this rate of aging has be n es-ahlished, one,.eeds only "o know. the anticipated ambient temperature for the 40-ye r life period to determine an equivalent aging exposure.

Mhen an Arrhenius aging plot line has been deteriiined for a material (see ex mple at-ached), one need only to draw a para.tlel line through the desir d 40-year ambient temperature point to establish an equivalent aging line. Any point on this new line now defines equivalent «ime/temperature aging parameter for the given material that simulates 40-year life at this particular ambient temperature.

For the examp'le attached, 60oC was chosen as the anticipated 40-year ambient. The equivalent aging line sho~s that approximately 6i0 hrs. or 27 days 9 1i0oC or 7 days 9 121oC both would result in equivalent aging for this material to simulate 40 years aging to 60oC. p y Qg~g bamuel ploore Operations L g Oekcrcn Qivis}cn 'I. a .V I lS'settee L ~ '1, dktt a J ~ ~ k k J L «ta ~ (\ TSS II Lkaos seas. rt, kk., strake krg ',, '\ ~ « i Lt a« trtLkr~ k ' '' ~ ~ ~ 'LM . S~1L'I t T'lkt t. L }1 r \ } Sri I'l Fr }}hah . «},t '" .. }.}ix=-.

~~~ =. 1 a ~ a. ~ L ts.r- i ~ I t 't . Ttk+ },1} s 1 ~ 1, i%litt\ ~ f Arrisr. I a I (net. 0= ~ 0 s.otttoooooossloka.vier m ers I equi"u'S= Kethod:—:":=:-—:=='~~

~~I A ts wk«rl tsl~~

~~'tsror },t'~L .}1 IL}Mftr ' Li}aa . =s .t.. s~\ } ~a 0~~

~~0 t es'LLCL « 1 tkkrkcas e «FeL. kas- t er r =l-=«S ~~ 0~~

~~0 i Arrrttt ~Mer«ararLTA sa«IL ' aa=m- 1 ~W tsiksi.~~

~~F«aks tr«k « I p sr%et ' tarLi sake ItrL"% SHS rl 1 L~~

~~it - tataetrLTO}a i . MCPCIL}sLL}: ~~~}«ekFTT}at — e} ~LITSTSF ~t... Lrttiaatl IL}r . ~Dirk . Its} "}W}LLtkt}Z ~P t- }reL L 'kkr .. ' t~~

~~~ Its t'I ~ VIP atrtkraa( al I ~ I 1 ~ Ir. } I ~I Fr Lt~ 'it&1 1 alla k kk t L OS*««FeF rVLWSI «t V k 1 LTLM'l ~akl I t 'I r~~

~~Mkrarar ~W. ~}a}T'. 'Hat} kFlora taaILLatLT krak ~ ~t 1 rkk Ikl 1 ~}}P —la ~~+ .,'w .asst= r.stkrD~~~~

~~28 27 26 25 ka 4 L 23 22 2l A R|QAH ERE'C) Ri AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERYICE CORPORATION~~

~~OWER SY5~C~~

~~OATE: October 8, 1981~~

~~5UgJFcTa Arrhenius Analyst.s~~

~~FROMM E. A. Howard/R. M. Hayes~~

~~TOr L. F. Caso~~

As per our telephone conversations and your letter dated 10/5/81, attached find the most current list of devices and their respective calculated lives after the LOCA at 120 F. This list includes the following updates: 1) Devices 16 and 17 use of upper compartment curve. One run with TA = 110 F (LOCA file L22.9.1U) One run with TA = 80 F (New LOCA file L22.9Ul) 2) All assumed values of B equal to 6000 were changed to the lowest B of 5747 to be conservative. 3) New LOCA file created for cable CI-4 (LCI4.2) and used in the run.

4) New B of 6812 calculated and used for CI-3, CI-9 in runs on files CI-3.2 and CI-3.3. 5) New test file created for CP-12 and new B coefficient of 6640 used. Also attached is a copy of the ARAN program requested, the new files created for this latest update, and a summary report of work to date on this project. Any questions may be directed to R. M. Hayes on ext. 1048 in Columbus.

~~I„ .r E. A. Ho~ard~~

~~('. —'.:.. ~" R. M. Hayes EAH/RMH:j 11 I Attachments cc: C. H. Shih C. Yi~~

~~IHT R A-SY ST E M~~

~~Table I~~

~~Device Coe fficient Test LOCA Calculated Life After B Profile Profile LOCA at 1 2 0F(Hours)~~

6 6 9 3 C I2 . 2 L2 2 . 9 . 2 L 7, 3 5 2, 9 2 2 6 2 6 4 C I8 ~ 2 L22.9.2L 3, 3 0 2, 7 2 5 (a)5747 C I1 . 2 L1 3 . 1L 2 9, 5 6 8 6 8 1 2 C I3 ~ 2 L2 2 . 9 . 2 L 3, 5 2 8, 3 0 3 ( I ) 5 7 4 7 C I4 . 2 LC 1 4 . 2 Failed before LOCA* (<) u 1 5 7 4 7 C I5 ~ 2 L22.9.2L 1 8 8, 8 2 1 5 7 4 7 CP 1 ~ 2 L1 3 . 1L 1, 9 0 0, 1 4 2 6 8 1 2 ~ C I3 3 L22.9.2L 5 F 9 2 4 F 6 0 9 u ) 5 7 4 7 CP 1 1 ~ 2 L22.9.2L 5 4 9, 0 4 2 i 7 7 { ) 5 4 CP 1 3 ~ 2 L22.9.2L 4 1 9, 9 0 2 (a 1 1 ) 5 7 4 7 CP 4 ~ 3 L2 2 . 9 . 2 L 1, 2 3 4, 9 5 3 (< 1 2 1 5 7 4 7 C P 4 ~ 2 L2 2 . 9 . 2 L 8 5, 5 7 1 > 1 3 ( ) 5 7 4 7 TI1 ~ 2 L2 2 . 9 . 2 L 1 8 1, 6 6 0 I ) 1 4 ( 5 7 4 7 TI1 ~ 5 L2 2 . 9 . 2 L 1, 8 4 6, 5 6 0 1 5 ) 5 7 4 7 C P 1 0 L2 2 . 9 . 2 L 8 8 3, 1 2 9 1 6 ( i ) 5 7 4 7 F 1 . 2 L2 2 . 9 . U1 1, 2 0 9, 9 2 2 ( i > 5 7 4 7 F 1 . 2 L2 2 . 9 . 1 U 1, 0 5 6, 4 2 7 ( L ) 5 7 4 7 H 1 ~ 2 L2 2 . 9 . U1 1 3 9, 7 4 7 7 7 ~ (, ) 5 4 H 1 2 L2 2 . 9 . 1 U Fa i1 e d before L0 CA ** 8 1 ) 5 7 4 7 TI5 ~ 2 L22.9.2L 5, 9 6 2 1 9 (1 ) 5 7 4 7 TP 1 ~ 2 L2 2 . 9 . 2 L 1 4 5, 8 7 6 2 0 6 6 4 0 CP 1 2 L22.9.2L 6 5 1, 1 3 1

+i y.~ Ho te s: *S e e explanation in text . **Used forcomparisonpurposes( i >o'pFo 4>~>~k~ (<)V~ ~i.peaag'oq*nAej~~~~~+v~~-e'ok 1 ~y c f ~~ ~ g rv4 fv~ v &» a~VJ4 +8 r l/VIA. W ll II t&$ p~o" (. l~yv f.-iv~l» i: I&o'aQ)awj. /ck.P i )

~~l I I t &))l ~ )ggg)P'~]*~~gggyFC }loci )0 y I~MHj'~ «V 4 a C C F " 3 ~ (F ~ f +g f~ ~ &f 5 o+'~'~(<'kr ~ Q(w~gg~ lrshs II f f/(JCQ+Q+( Repor t: Arrhenius Analys is~~

The Arrhenius Analysis of the remaining life of a component after a thermal shock was continued as more information was received from New York. Many of the devices were not furnished with specific B coefficients and some did not have an established LOCA profile which we could work. Therefore, after two sets of correspondence and many runs of the ARAN program, the enclosed list, Table is the most current and complete in information. Documentation on all LOCA profile data files, test profile data files, and the ARAN program were furnished. The desired results were those which produced the lowest number of hours of remaining life. These were obtained using the lower compartment curve on graph 22.9.2 and using the lowest

B obtained of 5747. Devices 16 and 17 were upper compartment devices, therefore, the upper compartment curves on the graphs were necessary. Attached to this report are two sample calculations of the remaining life of a component. One calculation is for a device that survived a LOCA and the other is for one that failed during plant operation. ~ The reason that the CZ4-2 cable failed the test is because there wasn't sufficient test data to show it would last the life of the plant, 40 years, and therefore might not survive a LOCA at some time during plant operation.

~~E. A. Howard J'~~

~~P lq(iCak CalCu.(>%'io~ oY 4RP Q (roqro.~~~

~~Qv)cc. ~ 4 CZ, ~ 2.~~

~~7 c.5% Vzo~ i i c. ' m 5, 2. L.oc. A V~oR.h a: l Z: Z, 3. Z 4 Coo.~+; aizr y: 5 7+ |~~

~~Yz,si YeeQ;a '. L c)c Q %poli(c. 0>>< '~~

~~= = = i 4<'7 K ') aE,'= > 'sr. Vp, 3)4.33 K ') Ahp BSo4j;oo 4r~ ~ = 4o~r = ~.~ = o < g t '( ) d" Z Q 'nr. j 6-,= .ol'a 7~~

~~Z9,4 ')C; d-'~ ioR 'hr. 38< K ) r, = -40 ~ ', ~-'.~= . SoaS ~r. '5ri SR~~

~~Wr o~ Co~~kar yr ops-em g g. P ~:~~

~~YcOt +r o i lc. ~~~

~~6C zg>-g- ~, )~~

~~"+ sa> x l ~io 3SS. 3'7 hr~. s(s~1 "v. (0 ST47 %73 5 " gal.K +7 ( 3 l~"M. ~a~op )aQ W lo i ~ \ l ~ ROC Q i 3q I Uioo l p ~7g~ 7g+ lD ~ ~( so~ g f Vl+7 < ~3a3 ~ pi<„'53 3So+oO ~ I.O~~

~~c =~~

~~. oo l8~~

~~= (),ZS'7R -4iZ 38) P ~ ~ 1 -4- ~ ~ ~ w ~l.O.KIOSK 'Parr C. CB( o'r ~ a.. I~~

~~rye.r'.Ji~~

~~CC.~~

~~Iz~T Pro r lc. CZ.4.2. t-OC &, Prozihc-" Q C L'4" 2. ' C.oe>~'iC,'ia.~j t <'7~~

~~i caw Pro>iNc.Qg ca:~~

~~= ~ Tp ~ 3)4.33 'l(; a4 p, 35o4oohrs +o r» '1 ~< oooo@ 3 78 < ~ TZ = 35).33 K') @her ~ 0,"g = .O)02.'l8 c r5. ~st% = ~ 2.h. SQ pro m | ogpu.zc.p'roq,t hen PP +Mi n 8(w ++/~~

~~h soo~~

~~58(. I~~

~~4 xoo '-5- \ 6 4 a~3.~ -+)~~

~~57+7 378 f- Woo ~ Wi \d S.<~ic + Wr~. l 6 ( ~7a-~- K4g+ 10 S7+7 ( gg3oy g8[ 33 iC~~

~~~ ooZZ2 ~ 10~~

~~4-. 8 x io —,~) = ~(~,-.- ~ lo ,$ 0~~

~~5741 4 3aa~X. ~~hei< ) . ooa2 78 k 10~~

~~7. cox~~

~~\ ~ 44 ~io 4r+. + ~+. + ~ + ~ GoB.( + 9.9~ x~~

~~(~o F g-" e c- Ccc. 5 ( I ~ B PIG v 5 c o ca 4 i o c)~~

~~T, 185,35 kc+ a+~~

~~IS ARAa rR~ . 0 : )0 DI:": ilSIOH . (25), I(25),L Z(25),LTI(25) '7 REAu LTI,Ia"-,LI."E,LlCO,LEilGaH~~

~~0 PR:i," iilPai~:lAi". OP .S.:ILZ"; IiiPU, S : '0 PRI:e, "I:iPUT:lAl'~ OP LOCA PILE"; I:lPUT,LOCA 60 160 READ( =S...ERR~1000) LI:l., iiOT, (LiilZ,'a (I), aI(I), I~1,:iO )~~

' '>4 164 IP( IUD'(.:1=~ 1 ) GO 105 '.0 170READ( LOCA,, ERR~1001 ) LI:lE,llOL,(LillE,LTE(I),LTI(I), I~1,llOL),LIiZ, .SZ ' 4 —-RZJ I ie D LOCA. '3CC A L A I:iG:< 'Z REFEREilCZD TO 100 DEERE S CELCIiJS OR 373 DEGREES KELVIU 7 ?li":., "I::P"". a.":":.-'CI.";ll"-e" Li .U,3 ~3 T100~0 :0 DC 1 Iaal,:iO LkrrrIafi+ aererev aH +—aT I( I) ~ '.C 1 .100 .100 .TI( I) 10 (3/373-B/TTZ( I) ) 5 ITALO DO 2 I~I,UOL- OO~L100~Lai( I) +10++(S/373 S/LT ( I) ) TI'RE+ L"I(I) :0.:( 100 0 .%CO)-QC. TO-260- '-5C Iee L IPZ~:.XP"CTZD LIPS AT SZT.LZD TZHP. APaZR LOCA PiiiiSHED >O;I:"="-,'1OO-'100) 1O (S/".S~"-S/373) 0 250 "::" "". Z-LT:(I}, Ti::.Z (1~X,"."A~LUP~~'I DU|ii:lG uCCA SEL1iZZr'1" e P6.2, "AilD",P6e2} 2 4 POh;eA hvar 90 QQ r ee lerS el 77+ I e r 0 270 '"- 0 "- "0"'!'1X "CALCULATED LI."E ~R uGCA A ",P4.0, "DEGREES CZLCIUS~", P20.0, "HOURS" //) =-.0 290 ?Rilla, "AreGaHZR CASZr'4>Y S) ~ I:iPUQ '".0 IF ( I.:i..1 ) GO"0 400 10 PRI iT " 'i"-2 LOCA:iuZ. (1~YES)" IilPUT, INDiZ 20. I."(IsiDEX.iiEe1) QGaO 330 "25 P;ii:lT,"I PUT:lA.lZ OP 'OCA "ILE"; IliPU..'OCA

~~~ le e ~ \ r rrplh e e ~ ~ Qea V Xl g l a ~ rtaee I Viaara re I, pgr„>~A~g 0 er ~ r er irg ree IUPUae w Sere~~

~~0 1COO.?Ri;l" "ZRPBR L'l "M"'ILE",TZS'",.".LI.'I'-'P..".,L e5 r OPIO 5QO :0 1001 PRIil. ""-i'ROR I'. OCA PIuE",LOCA " I:lZP", LI'lE~~

~~IS s22.9.61~~

22.9.J1 OG:44=DE 09/30/81 4. :00 4 too ~ ) YX ;)0 299.67,350400 goo p +o <> (gr< wl s')gvtct Vlf')P MfQWf t QP 31 1. 003)1 . LM~~..'.e~Mse.c ~ '25 333 Opoo2 Lcd 4h ) ~ 125 15 i 'r, S age. 'tp 311,.209 I po lOo"F, '7~~ >c ~ AQ ~21;a9 --—-- ~~l ™~„eC~t~

~~:"=ADY S ~232~~

~~'-32 OB'44 D 09/30/01~~

o c. K....col~ 5 c. 'L 2. 3 2... )n9 .67,350400 ~0 '337 ,.3167 ~ ~ ')c '0-~0+ who ~ 4%~~~~ 6414$ ,.15 j-.'">p-ie-„ii]i)'-l'I'Y~ '0 3 ,.1111 >40 Bo ~, 4o <<5 ~4 2~((, ~ .gn 1 Z,o (qpo p 4ro Sz c. ~>O~'= 'F=5+O >e o——. 1 +O >(= cL,go 'ADY $ ( ) gee. g p HJ [5() ) ~ (sl.~. sag j.t '~.ld) A g

~~0 gr~~

~~' ~~~

~~i 4+ i-te i'lc.~~

~~4% ~ C5 $ QQ i QL)p'yp j'ivo ~ .(sa.„. ~ E.r .. ~ < ~ ++9.~g4 Cf ~ ~ 3o.~.~ LZ 0 &/+AC i 5o Zko" c 4- ~ gV y4 ltd W 4 g a herr, 'U P3C / +40 Z,,U .C ~ } QQ~5 p,3 j3 Vf.h, L1 qV~IC ~ i Zr s~~

~~llJ 4 I a'V ~ ~ aggro,~~

~~\ 1 5: 5v 'fi". tj/lg7/ 4 d. C. g... (.~ i1Q ~ c ~. c I' OO > O ~~~

~~y ~ 3 I)IJ +r Q ~ ~ .W. - —;- r-< ~~- r-- — ~- Sf ~~~ |- ~ A.o 2.L l ~, g pQg ~ 4Qq ~ w WC xi7~P S ~<~ -.3o ) ~ A ggr A ~C~ ~ ~ i~o zz.x c', 5. jcc. +sc V I ~~~

~~yr a N E'. » C K C > C 'I ~ AMERICAH ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION~~

~~OWE'R 5v 5T5 August 5, 1981 SUBJECT: Arrhenius Analysis to extend test duration to required operating times plus a margin. p+w 63 FROMs L.F. Caso AHu.J ~W 7 a. Tos C. H. Shih~~

Please find attached a list of cables, cable terminations, pump motors, fan motor and heater installed at D.C. Cook Plant for which the required operating times (Column 4) are less than the test durations (Column 6). Xt is requested that you apply the Arrhenius Analysis to these devices so as to extend the test durations to a minim of the required operating times plus 10% margin. Attached, also are the required operating time references (Column 5), and the environmental test profiles (Column 7).

The cable material are listed in Column 3 of the device list. The insulation is listed first followed by the jacket material (Insulation/Jacket Material) . The material associated with the acronyms given in Column 3, are as follows: XLPE — Cros linked Polyethylene CSPE — Clorosulphonated Polyethylene EPDM — Ethylene Propylene Rubber — EPR , Ethylene Propylene Rubber EP — Ethylene. Propylene Rubber HTK - Synthetic Rubber (HIgh*+~~"~ ~

~~(b) Raycnem WCSF -115-6-N + Heat Shrink~~

~~IHT RA-SY STEM~~

(c) Burndy Connector YSV14 (d) Raychem WCSF-070-12-N Heat Shrinkable Tubing or WCSF-200-12-N The power cable termination materials are a combination of the power cable materials and b, c, and d (above) . Please be advised that the present schedule for submitting this information is 8/13/81 to the Nuclear Safety and Licencing Section of AEPSC and 8/27/81 to the N.R.C. Your cooperation in realizing these schedules will be greatly appreciated.

~~F. Caso LFC:deh Attachments~~

Approved: J.N. Intrabartola cc: S.H. Horowitz T.E. King C.A. Ramjohn E. Welz gPo vs/J Q oIVIypnW O t.+VJ I e )IW PERU/iC:L + P %fry P4vZ~J~I n~'s 7 ass DEI/ICE oui,i~I/vi " AE /=EPEP~E g7ggoP TION PPo F>< ]9, $ -/~-~ ptLC'5oI 7i~ c+ /- g %PS 7<"Vi I.illC/I}8J E'l gL.PE/csPs 4 Ploaipf/~ PIC> gg.gS - /. Jg +El'450.] P)g Ig ~< /=ed . egg XLPE/HYpnLoe 4. /do~tz ogg+ j-/g -g Qo Jxyc' fj AGVS@+~ Fl J Ig Z CzrH HyP~L II gear Pa Oolge'g- ly 2 c/9 / U .-zl- 0'v II 0> XLpE cs pE I 'fEaa. , g o cgp- 'aM ~oj. FiglgZ g'$1 ~I& JJ cS' L S p=- I YzAa. (yg-Z~ ~ ~ pE/Cs 1 AEIQ Ic 5O4 Fly )g Z YzAa. FIG 9oog~gco C~g XLPE/HYPnLoa / oo gg..g —/g -g ZPDH- /lYpA~u AI=Pl Ic&4 FIJ I)Z FI6 aa.~. exp-z. H'fg8IO,V 1 YFAg- oaz y-/) -z gy P

~~CC -~ XLPE/C spa t GAEA R. .+i6 O-A'7 fy~~

~~Okohs t TI= o/cope'z ~ pgEA'.I- I."Py / Ye;~a. F/6 0 -P7 CI/~~

c P'/g I 'I'e'i)i FIQ Cl cP 7 Pt gggulfzED'PS'-R 7i~ jZEcpo ikt'D- 7 iltE O ~I='ATiH6 ~~/ ~'gcE. TEP.I AL- gEFEPwfl cE Oig ATioN Pt oFEp l,aalu cP// I Yawa F'I p o -p 7 ,. I 1 ~~ @F4 Fpl)Z ).-P .P gZ -a ply ~ pcs/op~, ll " g p/g EPR///YPALolJ 3 Mo~g,~„ Flg J3 l3 / P~,cg AEl I bm~y.r-yi~z, /98~ (~ C»ii~ SI ///'V8~-'cu Q PorA'4< Fig oz" 'f-ly-4 pgcP ls-2 d-d.ri'/dp /AT'llggIf(J4BESTOS AEQ dso4-/ py'Z P I 8J-AID -p il Jl CPg F'~Ng 9-/ -g. gg c/f AC+~ro4~~~ i. 7 g I/J57rPdlii. . /g Vga.o'P -/>-g ~ ~~RHiho) ~ 'DA/ r2/ gl V / gaaw RJ //6 -A(s 65og g- jgpI Pig Ij . ~4-<,j +,Sj 4 i7g F>A o>S g-/~ -a. //$ QEi t 4>~f FijI~Z V'l, ~ P/g F4'-g. ll 4 )dont/is oaa g-/p -S. //C A~ At=-V4 ~a< 4 FsJ4~ Z -g 7IIE'0 //- k~'gPg g~ P d>1 Fl.> . il 4- ~an-,iU OPP ~/ /J //4 CAR 65o4 F~~Igz ll Qggnu 'fzqa. / i=ig ly /8-/ «zJ y .4E~ 65~ F'iy Ic+ 2. 7P/-Zi .+g~- 8 !P/ ] '/Egad. OZZ. g-Ii -g /A-8 s AEW65Za-/-/g -2. /p FPZ-S~ >EaS5o4 Fig )$2 Fi6 022 g-ly-Z /g A~. /p7 ~ I''il 7 Pg //6 r/isJ gE'quiR.GD HPYJ p our L oF'ERA] g ply 7 1/>F Ri FaP EW cG pgoFiLC / gEA~ 9 AoA'7'

~~v'il 1» C&s" F~~

~~CLA 5 F JhlSUl Agog gpp~p+~~~

~~HAGNfP PlinF. IPsuMPio g HEAvy Fl/M w ~IPlGl.f J)wc8ohl GLAss~~

~~cd]L, g Rpogp Iw~y/ A,rid plo/dp3< 14(c A~~

~~7AP> AIRilP/wP pygmy gpf p ada~ gyp'~~

~~gEs/n/ EELY- VAcouw I'RE- owE /psPesggrzg ~~~

~~LEADs P PPALor/ ' ~ L q '~ ~~~

~~WK'R 5ygf ~ AusvsT, 7, /fg/~~

~~SU BlECT-~~

- FROM*

~~C. H- SWH <+CLASSED,~~

PL~A>E 'PI<0 ARRffMIUS PLOTS Fag CA,BLE ~y~~igLg L'AGE ~>«TII=I<> BE~A ~ THEsE: pL.ops 4gE'o SUPPL&tE4ti 087~ 7RA~MifTZi) z~ y~~ in'y 68'77ER <8 AuSU 7'Sil'7Z/ REcPO~7iuC /RiZHZM(u~ AH4LYSIS. F68 uO>Bed CORRGSPoHD 7O COLORS 2, OF 'AfE PG'ytc8 t4IHKH lAAS WgahlNMI~Q +0 gg~ p~iagggy:

~~CABLE HATaRl4t~~

~~CZZ. XLF'E (OCrsSLltVKBD F~~

~~Ol(OGAtLP(ETklYLENL: PR>PYCBM Q+5o [H~g+g5gzp~G o ~ )~~

~~Apnea ver ,/ j~ 3/7 RA&~~a~ r~~

~~ar~wl I w Pi~~

~~~ t ~ > ~ %r y ~ s ~ I \ ~ i.) ~ » ~ ~ A a ~ r ~ C i-~r. =-~ "..'.r'c L -'"'.-.-.:~,: 'cia Et » sl e VT ~ St'' ea C a» ir> S'a ~ ')JI» 'IR OVEN AGING TIME TO 40% RETENTION '00,000 OF ELONGATION~~

~~SAMPLES -.030 INSULATION WALLS~~

~~i0,000~~

~~O~ I,000 O~ C~ +o~~

~~[00~~

~~TEMPERATURE C~~

~~O ~ IA r~~~

~~~I F '1 P ilp c j~~

~~AIR OYEN AGING ARRHENIUS PLOT TIME TO 40% RETENTION OF ELONGATION 00,000~~

~~I0,000~~

~~O~ 1Q? 0 +~~~

~~1000~~

~~IOO~~

~~O C3 O 0 0 C 0 0 O nO lA O !A CO~~

~~IO 24 22~~

~~Ijr)dOOOO~~

~~c e, ~ t \~~

~~' ~ I, . I ~~~

~~1 ~ t I ~ 1 ~ I ~ I J~l e t e I~~

~~>oo aao ~ I~~

~~' ~ 6/0 ' I I ~ I I ~ 6 E E~~

~~~ . ~~~

~~~ I 1 ~ I e ~~~

~~~ C~~

~~~ ~ ~~~

~~~ ~ ~ ' 2— ~ e ~ I ~ ~ 1 I.:v:.;; I ~ ~ ~ c ~~~

~~I 1 t ~ t ~ ~ I re'I e ~ e I e I, '1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ 'I ~ ' P Ce-r. 't''1 t ~ {' j r l j tnl ~ I ~, c.!1' I r I 'I le!~~

~~r ~ 1 I' ~ ~' ~ et ~ c- v . e ~ ti 4.1 l ~~~

~~I' ~ ~ 2~~

~ ~ ~ .r P ~ c ~ e T ~ ~ ~ e ~ 1 ~ ~ 9. et e ~ ~ ~ I j P ~, 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ es ~ ~ '' ~ ! I ~ I '' \ I ~ ~ 4 1'g ~ ~ ~ j,e} I' ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ I ~ ~ tl j 'JI } r .0Z u lW7— 'n 6 T n 5 ~ {l ~ 1 t 1 ~ 'I 1 C ., I I C I ~ I I I l 1 4 I I. ~ i ~ il II I et 'c J : ~ c ~ I

~~v jc nV nn P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' e e~~ I e' I I .1 ~ 't 'I I f" IuffK I ) $ I 'f~~

~~r ~ ~ ~ 'c I c't I ~ I ! 'C ! ~ ~e I' C ' c 'LCL I I C I I I ~ee e ~ ~ e 1" 9 1 8 I I ~ 7 ~ ~ I 6. I ' I I c I ! I~~

~~~ ~ ~ I ~ I e ~ ~ I l,e .I I I 1 ~ I 1 ' 'lnE c re ~ ' ~ I I C ! ~ ! <'l. l. i I ~ I c , ~ 1 3~~

~~l ~ ~ ~~~

~~~ I I 6 l'f I ~ I 7.~~

~~~ ~~~

~~ROCKBESTOS FIREHALL III @g @c~Q~~

~~~ I + ~ ~ ! ~ I I ~ I ~ I i i "i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~

~~I i . j--I il -) I .. L ' i 1 ~ I 40 YRS I I I I i ~ ~ l ~ I I i ( I~~

~~~ I~~

~~~ ~ ~ i ~I' ~ ~, L-, I ~ I ~ L 4 ~ i~~

~~~ . a. I- -e VVi I ~ I- 100~000 %'RLTEHTB5 i ;; I I f ~ ~ ~ i --,GF: EL.URGAT.ION ~ il ~ ~ ~ I ~~~

~~I i I ' ~ (Has. ) ~ i ' ERICH E LFE-';— ~ ~,I~~

~~i ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ L . l . i .... ~ I I + I ~ I ~ I ~ l l .I ~ I I ~ — i i Tm I-- ~ ~ o,o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~

~~~ ~ ~ I~~

~~~ ~ I ~ ~ pe P ~ I~~

c I i I I i I g a. ~ ' l ! I I.l i I ... .' 0 I: I j ' V (I pl 4 ~ c P '~ U l ~ ~ Q ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ I (I 4 ~ I U l I I I' I J 4 i a4 ~ ~ I ~ i 0 'h i f I / ~ i ~ I -.'~ ~ I' U 850 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 i ~ % ~ ~ i i l c ' U I ~ i L L i I i + I v 1 c ~ i ~ I f— i. ! .L. ~ i I i I I' I I I I

~~I j ! !~~

~~~ ~ i~~

~~~ i ~ i ''C)QQ 00 260 2'0 220 00 IP5 Icv ] 50'-. 9 0 TH< Roc-ascrZc~ co (5-76) 30Lf '(', i ($ 77. (,,( A~(') gZVISZb gI V. 2+(~g. RUCKBES TOS F I REllALL I I I 7.~~

~~(IRRADIATIOtl CURED) ~ c" @<- Q S K~~

~~s I ' '/ I I \ ~ ~ ~ I I I * I I e < / I ! /', i .s ! s <0 YRS, I I < s I I l I I 'ONVERSION~~

~~PLOTOF';ARR(ENIUS ~ ' ~ ' / l / 00,000 S EMULATED,GO'R, AGING e I (,.'. I~~

~~~ ~ A I : OPERA I G TENPERATURE / i I ~ (HRS,) i ~VS, '0% RETE,'ETIO'l ; y/ SERVICE LIFE / OF ELOHGATION /< f g.s / I / i I Q ~ I ~ e / '3, 0 IW 0 V~~

~~I < ~~~

~~I I i~~

~~IJ«I I I V M I t I ~ g f'l i I ~ w J : ',850 I I I 0 I.~~

~~l I I o s I I~~

~~~ I I I I s~~

~~l ,I~~

~~I 100 I ! I 0 ZIIO 2~~

~~ROCKBESTOS FIREHALL III~~

~~v ~ ~ ~ r r I I I I I~~

1 i I I l I I r .I ~ ~ ~ ~ It"; I,},' i I t r v ~ .J ~ ... I 40 YRS I ~ I I I r i~ I l I i::/ I } I GKRRSI ONI OF, lsaRHENISS FLOT g t ~ ~ I i ! t }TQ 100, 000 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I g } ~ r ~ ~ I ~ .1 . I ~ ~ l Z++ vppem

~~~ t j ~ W I I I I o p I ~ ~ ~ I N ~~~

~~r I 'I i0 Z I I v 2 l .. ~ I~~

~~Itv lri 850 ~ —~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ C I v ~ I ~ I—--I —~ I ~ ~ —~ 6 4 v v t- ~~~

~~.. I „. r , ~ } I~ }. I I I ~ ~ I l . i. I I r I~~

~~I I l I LL - ~ ——I—-- I ' } I l i~~

~~~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ 7- i, 100 I ZZO 200 I'60 120 t00 SO 0 ZS0 260 240 ISO ] 5 Qt40 9 Q~~

~~('C) ~ c —'„scat.a) @dc ~ ~p~ ( (5-76)" +~}-Y 7) /9'77 ~ E?.EC > 4'>CAN C AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORPORATION~~

~~OWER SYSTE August 27, 1981 susiecT? Arrhenius Analysis 44PmI ~~~ 7c~~

~~FROM?'. F. Caso~~

~~TO? R. M. Hayes~~

Please find enclosed the additional information you requested to complete the Arrhenius Analysis for the devices listed in my letter to C. H. Shih, dated 8/5/81. Table 1 lists the device locations (in or out of containment), 5 TA, TSET and TA. LOCA profile is the same for all devices in the containment (022.9-1, 2). ~st roof'le for CP10 is enclosed. Test profiles fori'CPg TP ,~<411'nd N2 are not available. Note however, thaW these devices are all outside the containment..,/~ ~I,( <~+pg>> 4J I Table 52 lists the manufacturer, insulation and jacket materials for the instrument and power cables. This table would help in identifying the Arrhenius plots with their associated cables. Please note that the Arrhenius plot previously identified with CI8 is incorrect. The plot for this cable (Cerro Wire & Cable Company) is also enclosed.

~~LFC/jal APPROVED J. M. INTBAB RTOLA cc: T. . King S. H. Horowitz H. N. Scherer, Jr. — Columbus C. H. Shih E. Welz C. Ramjohn~~

~~" IN T .". 5Y 5T E M Ps LOC,ATTACH k4A SEi je cr I IN Cou7awvEs 40 AS //0 r~~

~~Q/7iSl& CcvtT.~~

~~/0 OVrSip< Cou. ~P ( Ou7-s>DE CoN7 oui.slDE CoMT oui-SIp8 CouT I /iV CoNAIHy.m /o // l4 ovT'lDG'OP ( ~ ouT-'sioj Coul. IN- CoWAaw" to65 p /t0 F~~

~~5'p I tlat'F~~

~~ON-StvE CoNT, F / IN- CO> i Atplv&i Xp l)o'F 8 / Ihl-CoeAiuHGN Io& 5'F t Oui-51'OplT,SiDE'oeT'o@ OUT~~

~~= ~ = 7~~7 /o6 S < 7p ll> FcR DEVIL.S ouiS(DE Cag7AigR&lT . 2' vLATlo> +4N U t=A cd RES SAc.~~i C~ I gZ pS/cs Z~~~

~~N/ PE/hPr'~~~~

~~~ + EPPES 8"P4'/Pl~~

~~gZFS//CS PZ~~

~~Q Z. 5 Pd&cnf Zpf~~4~~

~~I c'< 8 '(~no- Ma aM Mal(e w. x/.ez//+~~- CZ ~easy.'( Pjcmm EPDH iVg~ ] ~ QPZ~=c.~~

~~. C'Z'0 pc/,. Fc N4.pE s,~= Qk~M{g Ok~//dp PM Ok~/5 ~MjaNP~~~

~~FJM~A EPR N~~

ze" P~ ok~ig- gk PIG M" grcuc(, g/~Apts c /' D~~il~c ~>J c/>-:c d eel< ~C4'g~ E P//~p+ ee // //rgb+ ct'2 F~( ~ gp+ f~k sir'>c I c,p cp /9 QdP'i( ZP/// P/p~ geP ZJ. Ouaii ~ 'ed by I"ouedix Corp. 'Zest Report of'ovem- ber 19'75'Ff

~~i SM K d't it, steara chemical spray Test Profile:~~

.2 - ~ 3 lf"ads/hr, 200 lWads 346C'F, 113 psig =or 5 hrs 265 F, 28 psig for 4 days 215oFy 2 ps3.< for 26 do ys Chemical Spray- 3000 op+ ooron as ooric acid ~z so U. "0 1 'il" tfl ~ 06 ~ |"olar sod' os~ fate Q~v, Bred "~ th sod i'M ' ~ hydrozid to a PE of 9 o ll. 6.

~~(ROCKHESTOS FjRE'IIALL jj CERES pJI~E g QABlE j o g$,~~

~~, ~ 1 e o ~ ~ t ' w ~s: ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~~

~~L I ~:l I ..e ~ ~ I ~ s l, ~ > ~ 40 YRS I I ~ l ': I s — I / L' I iCOHVERS IOH OF, ~ l~~

~~~ ~ ' ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ I lA ~ ~ al — I I j I e~ I I I j -I ~ l ~ I " 00,000 o S-I "ii)'ATED-.~O. —..AEiJj"16. 602-: RETEHTIOIN—.. ; 2; ~ ~ — --l .OF.ELOIlI A I IOIH-.-- 'ron hC ~ ' ' „+~~

~~II I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l o A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~~~

~~1 ~ 1 e 1 1 j(, ~ ~ I t I 1 f 1 %J ' 1»~~

~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 .. ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ I ~s l. I ~ j ~ j '~ ~ ~ a a--> — o ~ ~ s~~

~~~ o g»r' a e C4 ~ ~ r o s , j. s I 1 1 s I . I e g r e I I s I ~ e~~

a 0 I I II i+jj+s V V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ e ~ ~ V 1 ' O ~ l ~ ~ e V I ~ ~ I l » yss v I e I - I t ~ ~ I j I'' I 1 oe — a — I oe e ~ ' ~ e +usa e " '.5 ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' u» 850 ~ < X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ l l ~ ~ ~ g I I j ~ t 1 1 I I I r r \ v ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ o o. ~ I j l 1 ~ v ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o I I

~~I 1 t ~ a I ~ I~~

~~e 1 s I I e ~ ~~~

~ ~ a ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -.( e o ~ l~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I> ~ ~ I --I--I—I —I ' 'I ' ~ o I ~ ~ —I- ~ 1 ~ ~ e I ~ ~ ~ I s 300 260»60 i@0 2»v'OO . 160 l60 g5 pliO l»0 IQo 90 80 60 ('c)' ~ rl Ra@chem Energy Division Report"

~~At)a J»'t "~1 < R~~

~~')OhA'D C. CKC LUCLEA( AltT)'(l~~

~~t'P" => ~ ~ F r Pg, /( ' ( Peg'w IC~~

~~(l > ~ . ~ .a ta~~

~~J~VC " ' a. c 1'JJI~~

~~I P J !i-iiTQT Ui'D.EYE~~

~~. 'qgi .ED:~~

~~E. G. SECT. F1LE:~~

~~/itic: -'- Pages HEAT AGING STUDY OF MCSF COMPOUND~~

~~Enclosures:~~

~~Report Number: Date: EDR 2001 10 August 1978~~

~~Tested by; Prepared by: Approved by: David D. Nyberg n blaga g Signature: Signature~~

~~Raychem Corporation 'Report may only be Energy Division used unchanged. ABSTRACT~~

Radiation crosslinked slabs of WCSF compound and MCSF 070/250 tubing were subjected to oven aging in air at 136oC, 150oC, 162oC and 175oC. Based on an Arrhenius analysis of the oven aging data, the time to 50% retention of original elongation plotted on semilog paper against the reciprocal of absolute temperature in degrees Kelvin yields a predicted service life for NCSF compound of 40 years at a continuous operating temperature of 91oC. CONTENTS

~~SECTION TITLE PAGE~~

~~~0b 'ective~~

~~2. Test Procedure~~

~~2. 1 Specimen Preparation~~

~~2.2 Oven Aging 3. Test Results~~

~~3. 1 Retention of Elongation= 3.2 Arrhenius Thermal Plot 3.3 Calculation of Heat of Activation 4. Conclusions 5. Tables~~

~~s'. 1 0'ven Aging Oata - MCSF Compound 6. Ficiures~~

~~6.1 Oven Aging Oata - MCSF Compound 6~~

~~6. 2 Arrhenius Thermal Plot - MCSF Compound 7~~

~~1. 08 JECT.IVE~~

~~To assess the thermal oxidative resistance of radiation crosslinked slabs of MCSF compound by oven aging of specimens in air at 136oC, 150oC, 162oC and 175oC.~~

~~2. TEST PROCEDURE~~

~~2. 1 S ecimen Preparation~~

Standard, pelletized, virgin WCSF compound was used. Slabs (6" x 6") were compression molded. Thickness was 75 12 mils. The slabs were crosslinked by radiation to the same crosslink density as MCSF tubing. Two Die 0 specimens from each slab were tested for tensile strength, ultimate elongation and tensile stress at 50» and 100% elongation (crosshead speed 2 inches per minute). The stress-strain values from this were averaged and used as the original values to which the heat aged samples were compared. 1 Forty three (43) slabs were prepared. Standard deviations for tensile strength, ultimate elongation and tensile stress at 50" and 100» elongation were calculated based on the original data from the two-Oie 0 specimens from each slab. Slabs were dis- carded if the above original stress-strain values were outside the mean value ~ twice the standard deviation for that value.

From the acceptable slabs (41), Oie 0 specimens were cut and all combined. Five Oie 0 specimens were chosen at random from the combined lot to provide one data point for the heat aging study. The original cross-sectional area of the specimens (pre-measured) were used to calculate the stress-strain properties after heat aging. A few specimens of WCSF 070/250 plant production tubing were included in this oven aging study to allow some comparison to the slab data. The tubing was recovered prior to heat aging. Three specimens of recovered tubing were used to calculate an average original value for the stress-strain properties of interest. As with MCSF compound, five specimens were used for each data point.

~~2.2 ~OA i~~

Forced air type Blue H ovens were used for heat aging at 136oC, 150oC, 162oC and 175oC. The ovens were calibrated with a L2 point recording thermocouple set-up at 12 different zones in the oven chamber. The temperature was monitored regularly with a single thermocouple permanently assigned to each oven. The temperature variation was less than ~2" of the specified exposure temperature in degrees centigrade.

~~The specimens in groups of five were hung vertically from the oven tray utilizing metal clips and hooks in the conventional Raychem manner.~~

~~3. TEST RESULTS~~

~~3. 1 Retention of Elon ation~~

The property of prime interest in this study was retention of original elongation which is a measurement of flexibility (or lack of brittleness). Both slabs and tubing oven aged at essentially'qui valent rates with a reduction of tensile strength and with a slow increase in tensile stress (modulus) or sti ffness.

The retention of original elongation versus time was plotted during the oven aging periods at the four different temperatures. ln Table 5. 1 the time (hours) to various percent retentions of original elongation are tabulated and this data is presented in graphical form in Figure 6. 1.

~~3.2 Arrhenius Thermal Plot~~

In order to construct the Arrhenius thermal plot in Figure 6.2, we chose an end-point for retention of original elongation of 50". The four experimental points for 136oC, 150oC, 162oC and 175oC yield a reasonably straight line predicting a service life of 40 years at a continuous operating temperature of 91o based on a conventional Arrhenius analysis of the time to 50" retention of elongation plotted on semilog paper against the reciprocal of absolute temperature in degrees Kelvin.

~~3.3 Calculation of Heat of Activation~~

From the slope of the Arrhenius thermal plot, the heat of activation for the thermal oxidation of WCSF compound was calculated to be 29 kcal/mole for the end-point of 50" retention of original elongation. This was calculated using the following equa- tions:

~~b = 2.303 (logyp tg - log],p tg)~~

~~1 - 1~~

Tz T< Heat of Activation = a H act = R x b where tq = time to endpoint (100,000 hours) t~ = time to endpoint (1000 hours) Tq = oC + 273 corresponding to tq T> = oC + 273 corresponding to tq b = LH act/R

~~R 1.98 cal mole C~~

~~4. CONCLUSIONS~~

On the basis of the oven aging study described in this report and the use of a conventional Arrhenius analysis of the data, it is concluded that the useful service life of radiation crosslinked MCSF compound is predicted to be 40 years at a continuous operating temperature in excess of 90~C. The heat of activation for the thermal oxidation of MCSF compound was calculated to be 29 kcal/mole. 5. TABLE

~~5. 1 OVEN AGING OATA - MCSF COMPOUNO~~

~~Oven Temperature, TIME (hours) to oC Various Levels of Retained Elongation~~

~~905 80» 70'X 60» 50% 40» 30» 20» 10» 136 7 1 470 1230 2700 4500 6020 7510 9810~~

~~150 35 107 331 960 1570 2030 2600 3230 4720~~

~~162 12 30 130 350 521 637 744 876 1100 175 4 20, 112 154 194 228 279 361 450 ~ g~~

~~ink t~~

~~'O" " 'C. - . ~ ~ CI . pra~mpqp=~@... - ~ 0 6.2 Arrhenius Thermal Plot MCSF Compound ~10A 9 8 1~~

~~~ \~~

~~I I ~ I I ~ ~ I I ~ I I I I I I ~ I I ~ I I I ~ I I ~ I I ~ ' I ~ I ~ ' I ~ 100,000 I ~ I I t I~~

~~I ~ I I ~ I I I ~ ~ I ~ ~ 'I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 10,000 I I ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I L-- ~ I I ~ I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I ~ ~ I I I 9 8~~

~~~ I 1,000 1 I ~ I I ~ I I ~ ~ L I I ~ ~ I 9. 8~~

~~100L~~

~~2.1 2.2 2.3 2.6 2.7 2 ~ I ~p(cAN Kt gc~~

~~AMERICAN EI.ECTRIC POYtER SERVICE CORPORATION ~BR SYS™+~~

~~September 28, 1982 508JECTc The Kerite Company Cable Environmental Qualification~~

~~FROM> L P. Caso TO- 79-81B Central Pile~~

~~The attached letter from the Kerite Company dated 9/21/82 should be made par~of our equipment qualification document reference.numbers~63 68,78 and 72..~~

~~L F. Caso 2.4/LFC:jal~~

~~APPROVE J N BARTOLA 49 Oay Street Seymour, Connecticut 08483 (203) 888-2591~~

~~Mall AilCorrespondence To: the kerit:e company P.O. Box 452 .. Seymour, Connecticut 06483~~

~~September 21, 1982~~

~~American Electric Power Service Corpor'ation 2 Broadway New York, NY I0004~~

~~ATTENTION: T.J. MASSAR'- ELECTRICAL ENGlNEERlNG DIVISION~~

~~Dear Sir: ',SUBJECT: DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT ~4 ~j~~~jE g7v, Q $ REFERENCE: QUALI F I CATI ON UPDATE~~

Me have enclosed LOCA profile (excerpted from,"Tests of Electrical Cables Under Simultaneous Exposure to Gamma Rad4gion, Steam and Chemical Spray %bile Electrically~ Energized"~ - March,i 1985'l Final Report NiF-C4020"2, Figure I) which describes a 100-day test conducted by the Franklin institute Research Laboratories. This test provided a sodium borate chemical spray with a pH of 10.5 for 100 days continuously. The attached profile and the following results are offered as documentation of Kerite insulation and jacket materials'Long-Term" {three months) immersi'on performance in a sodium borate solution.

~~The two cable samples (tested'n referenced report) are representative of each I/C which form the 3/C cable. Both samples (aged and unaged) are described as follows:~~

~~I/O, g6 AUG, 65 mi I HTK (N-98) insulation and 65 mi I FR (HC-711) jacket.~~

Each sample was irradiated to 200 megarads while installed in the autoclave. ln suirInary, both cables maintained their electrical loading (1000v ac, 50 amps) throughout the test. Each cable passed the 5 minute voltage with" stand test of 80 volts. ac per mi I of conductor insulation. This test was performed after completion of--the LOCA exposure and prior to disassembly of the test vessel while the cables were still'n 'the mandrel. American Electric Power Corp. &2M September 21, 1982

~~We trust that this is sufficient information to enable. you to answer the inquiry of the NRC. Very truly yours,~~

~~THE KERiTE COMPANY~~

~~Froel the office of: C.A. Lundy Hetropolitan PLSales Hanager Signee: N rma H. Oube inistrative Sales Assistant~~

CAL/NHO/ss Enc 1 osure PHASE X PHASE XK 3K COMBINED THERMAL AND SIMULTANEQU S STEAM/CHEMICAL-SPRAY/RADIATIONEXPOSURE STEAM AND CHEMICAL RADIATION AGING (l50 MEGARADS GAMMA RADIATION) 'HASESPRAY EXPOSURE (50 MEGARADS (NO GAMMA RADIATION) GAMMA RADIATION) 346 F/II3psig WITHIN 3 TO 5MIN. 335 F/95palg 340 320 3I5'F/69 prig

Q INSULATION 265oF/28psig RESISTANCE MEASVRKMKNT LI ~ 250 280'F/TOpsig (min) VllTHINIO SEC. 2(2~ F/0 prig + 200 OAII.Y l22iF(50iC)MAXIMUM Ql}ONCE PER WEEK STARTING AT 5 DAYS ~ ~ CASLKS AT ROOM CONDITIONS DURING RELOCATION OF TEST | l40 VESSEL TO OUTSIDE OF THK 7T DAYS RADIATION HOTCELL. l22 PREHEAT TO I40iF MAXIMUM O(R Q . IMMEDIATELYPRIOR TO TEST

~~IO ~ 3 .5 8 II l5 23 IOO VDAYS SEC HR HR HR HR HR 4 DAYS DAYS DAYS TIME~~~

~~F)gure ). Spec)fied Temperature, Pressure and Radkat)on Test Prof''le 8~~

~~( Attachment C to AEP:NRC:0578H Donald C. Cook Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Update to AEP:NRC:05788 Reference Lists 1 Document References Cited in IE Bulletin 79-01B~~

~~Conax Corp. Test Report IPS-234 2. Conax Corp. Test Report IPS-62 3. Conax Corp. 'Zest. Report 'IPS-137~~

4 ~ Conax Corp. Analysis Report IPS-324 5. FIRL Test Report F-C3341 6. FIRL Test Report F-C3694 7. Kerite Co. Report on the effects of Gamma Rad. and Autoclaving on Kerite power and control cables 8. Conax Corp. Test Report IPS-348 9. FIRL Test Report F-C4033-1 10. FIRL Test Report F-C3683 Isomedix Corp. Test Report of &lay, 1976 12. Cerro Nire and Cable Test Report of Hay, 1976 13. Westinghouse-Canada Test Report CNAPD-332 14. FIRL Test Report F-C4033-,3 15. Nestinghouse-.Canada Test Report CWAPD-326 16. Limitorque Corp. Test Lab. Project '=„"600456 17. Conax Corp. Test Report IPS-326 18. Conax Corp. Test Report IPS-327 19, Conax Corp. Test Report IPS-329

20. Nestinghouse Corp. Test Report NCAP-7709-L, Suppl. 2 21. Westinghouse Corp. Test Report NCAP-7829 '22. Limitorcue Corp. Test Report -;,600198 23. Limitorque Corp. Test Report, 5600376A, 24.. Limitorque Corp.. Test Report '600461 25. Isomedix Corp. Test; Report of 'November, 1975 ( ~ ~ 8 26. Foxboro Test Report TE-3.013 27. Westinghouse Electric Corp. Communication NS-PLC 5023 dated 4/26/78 from T. N. Anderson — Westinghouse to E. G. Case — NRC 28. Wes inghouse Electric Corp. Test Report NCAP-9157 29. Automatic Switch Co. Report AOS 21678/TR 30. Westinghouse Electric Corp. Communication NS-TNA-1950 31. Boston Insulated Wire Test No. 730212 32. Boston Insulated Wire Test No. 75C008 33. PIRL Test Report P-C-2935, Excerpt from 34. Rockbestos Products: Qual. of Firewall III Class IE Electric Cables .35. PIRL Test Report F-C 3016 36. PIRL Test Report P-C 4350-3 37. Okonite Co. Qual. of Okoguard Ethylene-Propylene Rubber Insulation for Nuclear Plant Service (5-2-77) 38. Cyprus Statement of 6-16-76 39. Cyprus Statement of 9-14-76 40. Cyprus Report No. 3525 41. Cyprus Report'o. 3658 42. Cyprus Statement of 6-16-76 43. Qual. of Namco Controls Limit Switch 44. PIRL Test Report F-C 3271 45. Conax Test Report lPS-339 46. Conax Test Report IPS-349

47. Lette" of 6-21-71 from W. P. Herarueter, Customer Service Lab. Bklyn., N. Y. to A. H. Statton, Boston Edison Co. 48. Lette of 4-17-80 from J. ~t. Allen (Hobil Oil Corp.) to Allen "eibleman (i4iEP) 49 Okonite Co. Qual.-of Okonite Ethylene-Propylene Rubber Znsulation fbi Nuclear Plant Service 7-3-78 I ~ S 50. Westinghouse Corp.WCAP 8541 Topical Report, Environmental Testing of Foxboro Transmitters 51. ITT/Barton Product Bulletin 288A/289-2 and Technical Manual 505-4 (A) 52. ITT/Barton Product/Bulletin GI-23-3 53. ITT/Barton Product/Bulletin GS-2A-ICIE

~~54. Foxbozo Product Spec. PSS-2A-1B3A~~

~~55. Westinghouse Corp. Spec. 677271~~

~~56. Fisher Control Co. Oper. Test of Fisher Type 546 Electro Pneumatic Transducer~~

~~57. Auto, Switch Co. Catalog No. 30 Bulletin 8300, 8302, 8315~~

~~58. Auto Switch Co. Catalog No. 30 Bulletin 8316~~

~~59. AEPSC NS&L Calculation DC-N-6420-2~~

~~60. Elect. Penetration Analysis~~

~~61; Flood-up Tube Qualification Packet 62. Instr. Cable Term Qual. 63. Required Time Qual. Analysis~~

~~64. Containment Spray Pump Motor 65. Environmental Qual. Class IE cable for outside containment service.~~

~~66. Westinghouse Electric Corp. Communications NS-TMA-2120~~

~~67. Westinghouse Electric Corp. Communications NS TMA-2441 WCAP 9885.~~

~~68. Electrical Cable Submergence Qualification~~

~~69. Acton Test Report 16013-2 of July 6, 1981< 70. Letter of 4/18/80 From Robert Henry of Kerite to L. F. Caso-AEP I 71. Conax Corp. IPS-325~~

~~72. Chemical Spray pH Qualification~~

~~73. EC Pl-2-00-04 Arrhenius Calc. on Barton Transmitters~~

~~S ecified Environment Document References~~

~~EE Division Device Ref, No. Parameter Reference Desi nation~~

~~102 Temperature FSAR App. N Elect. penetr- Fig. N13.13 1 ations Hydrogen N13.13-2 Recomb. IMO-315 FSAR Figs 316, 325, 326 14 .3e4-11,-12 (Ul) VMO-101)102 QCM-250~~

102 Temperature FSAR Air Recirc. Fan Figs. 022.0-1,-2 NRV valve L. FSAR Figs. Sw's. IMO-51, 14.2.5-9,-10 52, 53, 54 IMO-128 ICM-111, 129 NM0-151, 152, 153 103 Pressure Westinghouse Letter Elec. Pen. AEW 6504, Fig. 162 Hydr. Recomb. Air Recirc. Fan IMO-51, 52, 53, 54 IMO-128 ICM-111, 129

~~103 Pressure W Letter IM0-315, 316, 325 AEW 6504 326 Figs 1&2 VM0-101, 102 QCM-250 NM0-151, 152, 153~~

~~103 Pressure FSAR 14.3.4 NRV L. SW's (U1)~~

~~104 Chemical Spray FSAR Fig. NRV L. SW's 14;3. 4-6 (U1)~~

105 Radiation NSSL Review All inside calculation SF containment Merger equipment AEP-NRC-0578 Dated 10/6/81 106 Radiation ,Letter of 12/16/81 All outside =" from: C. Ramgohn containment to: S. M. Toth equipment

~~Documentation Device Ref. No. 'arameter Reference Desi nation~~

~~107 Temper atur e FSAR All outside Pressure Fig. containment 14.4-6-8 (U1) equipment~~

~~108 Required Letter of 1/20/82 VM0-101, 102 Operating From: K. Vehstedt QCM-250 Time To: L. F. Caso~~

~~109 Required FSAR Table 7.5-2 Electrical Operating Penetrations Time Hydrogen Recomb. Air Recirc. Fan motors IM0-51, 52, 53, 54 IMO-128 ICM-111, 129~~

~~110 Required Letter of 4/14/75 IMO-315. 316. 325 Operating 9/29/75 326 Time From: .J. Tillinghast Outside contain- AEP MOV valves To: K. Kneel«VRC~~

~~112~~

~~113~~

~~114 Chemical Spray Tech. Spec Elec. Penetration 3/4-5, 3/4-5.6 Hydr. Recomb. Inside cont. valve (except VMO's & NMO's)~~

~~115 Chemical Spray Letter of 1/10/78 Air Recirculation From: S.J. Milioti fan motor 118 To: J. Feinstein VM0-101,102~~

~~116 Chemical Spray Letter of 4/23/82 From: T. Durando To: L. F, Caso NM0-151, 152, 153~~

~~117~~

118 Required Letter of 4/14/82 Outside contain- K. Vehstedt 'rom: ment Pump Motors To '. L. F . Ca so NRV Lim. Sw's ,NM0-151, 152, 153 ICM-305, 306 Attachment D to. AEP:NRC:0578H Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Update to AEP:NRC:0578B Upper Compartment Temperature / le,~ Contrary to what is stated in Section 3.3 of the NRC Equipment gualification Safety E~aluation Report, the maximum upper compartment temperature is not 130 F.

~~The worst-case temperature transients for a h1SLB are given in Section 14.3.4 (Unit II) in the updated FSAR. The peak upper compartment temperature is approximately 150 F.~~

The worst-case temperature transients for a LOCA are given in Section 14.3.4 (Unit I), Figures 14.3.4-11 and 14.3.4-12. The pea) upper compartment temperature from Figure 14.3.4-12 150 F. 0 is approximately This value is higher than the 130 F given in the NRC SER as the maximum temperature.

In response .to an NRC question during a telephone conversation on this topic, the analyses of the containment response to LOCAs and. MSLBs did account for operation of the air return fans. g' Attachment E to AEP:NRC;0578H Donald C. Cook Plant Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Update to AEP;NRC:05788 General Notes

~~GENERAL HOTES~~

l. Any one piece of equipment may be qualified by more than one test report. For instance, it may be qualified for steam environment by one report, for chemical spray environment by another, and for radiation environment by still another report. In a case like this, the qualification chart will list the different test reports and will specify, for each report, the qualification method used for that test (simultaneous, or sequential testing) .

For the case where a parameter has been qualified by test but the range attained during testing fell short of the required levels in the specified D. C. Cook plant environment, engineering analysis may have been used to explain why the environmental quantities achieved during testing are adequate for the application at hand. In these instances we call the equipment qualified by "Combination Method". This device has been used mainly to explain "Operating Time" and "Chemical Spray" qualifications.

In some instances our devices have not been tested at all, however because they are required to operate in a relatively mild post-accident environment (e.g. outside containment) and because we know of devices qualifi.ed for a much harsher environment using similar or some generic type material; we have called these devices qualified by "Engineering Revie~ Methods".

~~According to this logic, electrical devices that will be submerged following an accident inside containment, have been qualified as follows:~~

a. Equipment is protected against submergence by floodup tubes: cable and cable terminations at the containment penetrations (Engineering Review Method). b. Equipment has been qualified for submergence but the submergence test did not include a radiation test (Combinat'on Method) .

c. Equipment has been qualified for LOCA and MSL3 and has been immersed after these tests as requ'red by IEEE 383-1974 (Engineering Review Method). 2. 'he limit switches, along with their cable and their cable terminations, for. the valves listed belo~ have been deleted from Attachments 2 and 3 to our submittal AZP:NRC:00356 ('"Aaster List Ho. 2"). These 'imit switches are used'for valve position indication only; that is, they are not used in the valve control circuit and are, therefore, no t needed for the operation of the valve. I

~~0 Location Valve Zneide Containment Outside Containment~~

~~HRV-211 X 212 X 221 X 222 X 231 X 232 X 241 X 242 X 213 X 223 X 233 Z FRU-210 X 220 X 230 X 240 X VCR-11 21 X 101 X 102 X 103 X 104 X 105 X 106 X 107 X~~

For the valves outside containment, valve position can be readily verified. Those inside containment (VCR') are ccntainment isolation valves; a redundant containment isolation valve located outside the containment, in series with the one inside the containment, will serve as a backup device., The position of the valve outside containment can be verified.-

3. Inside the containment, the LO'CA pressure profile consists of an initial peak and a long-term peak after the ice melts out. The maximum caLculated initial peak is 14.4 psig across the operating deck, as stated in Unit 2 FSAR Section 14.3.4. The long-tera peak is shown in Figures 1 and 2 of Westinghouse letter AEVi-6504 to AEPSC (Ref. 103).6 For the Cook Plant, the calculated minimum ice mass is 2.13 X 10 lbs. or 1098 Lbslbasket. The value is intermediate to the cases pictured and gives a long term peak or 12 psig. in tne equipment qualification charts, the symbol "HA" means "not applicable. " 5. The bounding values given in the specified environment column give a very conservative description of the adverse environment for two reasons. First, each bounding value may come from a different analyzed accident case, so that typically all the worst values are not calculated to occur during the same postulated scenario. Also, some of the ecuipment referenced to a specific chart may be subject to only some of the adverse environment parameters or to much less severe calculated values of some parameters.

6. Equipment required due to changes in emergency operating procedures after January 14, 1980 (the issue date of IE Bulletin 79-01B) is not always included in this submittal. The cut-off date was agreed to by members of your staff at the February 7, 1980 clarification meeting in Glen Ellyn, Illinois.

~~NOTE OH VALVE NOTOR OPERATORS~~

The valve operators previously listed below were qualified for operation in a radiation environment. See letter of 7/17/80 from J. J. Oliver - Limitorque, to L. F. Caso - AEP (Ref. 74) . These valves however, are equipped with brakes and the brakes were not part of the assembly when the valves were qualified for radiation, However, postulated failure of the brakes due to high radiation levels will not prevent the valves from opening. See letter of 11/2/81 from T. Durando of the Piping and Valves Section to L. F. Caso of the Electrical Generation Section (Ref. 74) .

~~VALVE COL'QKViZ~~

ICN-311 These valves would only be operated if 321 the RHR spray system was employed. The RHR spray system is back up containment pressure suppression system and the Cook safety analysis as reported in the FSAR demonstrates that is not needed for LOCA or HELB mitigation. L30-340 These valves are used during the 350 switchover from the ECC injection phase 360 to EEC recirculation. However, the 361 . sequence of their operation as defined in 362 emergency operating procedures limits the time of their exposure prior to thei" operation to only a very short time. LM-910 These valves are used "to terminate the 911 suction of the charging pumps from the RWST once ECC'witchover to to rec'rculation has been accomplished. They are protected aga'nst exposure to post-LOCA recirculation flow by a check valve.

~~0 NOTES ON CABLE TERMINATIONS~~

Calculated containment temperature 2.78 hours after a LOCA is 185 F and decreasing (Figure 14.3.4-17, Unit I). This long term environment does not pose a challenge to the mechanical or electrical quality of the termination.

~~230 F for ten seconds and 11.5 psig for 0.1 seconds will not challenge the mechanical or electrical quality of the termination.~~

Environmental qualification for the control cable termination at the solenoid operated valves which serve the air-operated .containment isolation valves (the VCRs) is not needed for the following reason. Energization of the solenoid is necessary to keep the containment isolation valves open. If the valves were open at the time of the accident, a containment isolation signal would de-energize the solenoid, closing the valves. If the valves were closed, they would remian closed. No matter what the initial valves'osition is at the time of the accident, no failure of the cable termination will succeed in energizi.ng the solenoid and opening the valves, when the containment isolation signal and/or the control switch in the control room'has been actuated to close the valves.

~~Note 1 on valve motor operators pertains also to the termination at the motors serving the valves listed. NOTES ON CABLES~~

~~Instrument cable for the following instruments inside containment is not in floodup tubes in either Unit I or Unit 2.~~

~~a. h1ain steam flow transmitters:~~

~~MFC-110, 111, 120, 121, 130, 132, 140, 141 8I 142~~

~~b. Pressurizer pressure transmitter:~~

~~NPS-153~~

~~c. Reactor Coolant System narrow range temperature transmitters:~~

~~NTP-110, 111, 120, 121, 130, 131, 140, 141, 210, 211, 220 230, 231, 240, 241.~~

Placing these instrument cables in floodup tubes is not necessary for the following reasons. The MFC's and the NTP's will only be used for actuati'on of protecti've systems immediately after the accident, long before their cable becomes submerged. NPS-153 provides an additional monitoring functi'on to that already provided by NPP-151, 152, and 153 which have their cables protected by floodup tubes. 2. Control cables for the following equipment inside containment is not in floodup tubes in Unit 1 only.

Containment isolation valves (VCR's} listed in General Note 2. Operation of these valves (closing them) will take place immediately after the accident, long before the cable will be submerged. Postulated cable damage (because of submergence or otherwise) is not capable of re-opening these valves. 3. Calculated containmgnt temperature 2.78 hours (10,000 seconds) after a LOCA is 385 F and decreasing (Figure 14,3.4-17, Unit )). The 0 electrical cable is rated for continuous operation at 194 F (90 C). Therefore the containment environmental temperature after 2.78 hours does not represent a challenge to the mechanical electrical quality of the cable. r NOTE. ON INSTRKKNTS

~~Lists A-J, vhi,ch are referenced on the equipment qualification charts, are attached.~~

~~(ATTACHMENT TO NOTES ON INSTRUMENTS )~~

~~LIST A~~

Engineered Safeguards Actuation Unit 1 Only Containment Phase A isolation Actuation Unit 1 Only 'AAain Steam Isolation Actuation Both Unit 1 & 2 Reactor Trip Actuation Both Unit 1 & 2 in Steam - Normal System Monitoring Both Unit 1 & 2

~~LIST B~~

Engineered Safeguards Actuation Both Unit 1 & 2 Containment Phase A Isolation Both Unit 1 & 2 Post Accident Monitoring Unit 2 Only Reactor Trip Actuation Both Unit 1 & 2 Hain Steam Normal System Monitoring Both Unit 1 & 2 Remote Shut-down Monitoring Both Unit,l & 2

~~LIST C~~

Engineered Safeguards Actuation Both Unit 1 & 2" Containment Phase A Isolation Actuation Both Unit 1 & 2 Post Accident ?/onitoring Unit 2 Only Hain Steam Isolation Actuation Both Unit 1 & 2 Hain Steam Normal System Monitoring Both Unit 1 & 2 Remote Shut-down Monitoring Both Unit 1 & 2

~~LIST D~~

~~Engineered Safeguards Actuation Unit 1 Only Containment Phase A solation Actuation Unit 1 Only~~

~~LIST E~~

Engineered Safegu"rds Actuation Both Unit 1 & 2 Containment Phase A Isolation Actuation Both Unit 1 & 2 Remote Shut-down Monitoring Both Unit 1 & 2 Reactor Coolant Normal System Monitor'ng Both Unit 1 & 2 4

~~t LIST F~~

Engineered Safeguards Actuation Both Units 1 & 2 Containment Phase A Isolation Actuation Both Units 1 & 2 Post Arcc ident Honitoring Unit 2 Only Containment Phase B Isolation Actuation Both Units 1 & 2 Containment Spray Actuation Both Units 1 & 2 Hain Steam Isolation Actuation Both Units 1 & 2

~~LIST G~~

~~Post Accident Monitoring Unit 2 Only Containment Phase B Isolation Actuation Both Unit 1 & 2 Containment Spray Actuation Both Unit 1 & 2 Hain Steam Isolation Actuation Both Unit 1 & 2~~

LIST H Post Accident Monitoring Unit 2.Only L~fain Feedwater Isolation Actuation Both Unit 1 & 2 Reactor Trip Actuation Both Unit 1 & 2 . ain Feedwater Ltormal System Monitor"'ng Both Unit 1 & 2 LIST J

~~Reactor Trip Actuation Both Unit 1 & 2 Post Accident Monitoring Unit 2 Only Remote Shut»down Monitor'ng Both Unit 1 & 2 Reactor Coolan" Normal System Monitoring Both Unit 1 & 2 J V~~

~~~ >~~