Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Parivahan Bhavan, Tehri Kothi 6 M.G Marg, Lucknow 226001 Website

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Parivahan Bhavan, Tehri Kothi 6 M.G Marg, Lucknow 226001 Website 2021 SELECTION OF A SYSTEM INTEGRATOR FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF “IoT BASED INTEGRATED BUS TICKETING SYSTEM” MOBILE ONLINE APPS FOR RESERVATION PASSENGERS SYSTEM EMV OVER THE COMPLIANT COUNTER FAST INSTANT CHARGING SMART E-TICKETING CARDS FOR MACHINES PASSENGERS Downloaded from www.upsrtc.com COMMAND qSPARC/RuPay CONTROL NCMC CARDS CENTRE(CCC) RFP DOCUMENT Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Parivahan Bhavan, Tehri Kothi 6 M.G Marg, Lucknow 226001 website: www.upsrtc.com Downloaded from www.upsrtc.com Page | 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) For Selection of a System Integrator for Implementation of “IoT Based Integrated Bus Ticketing System at UPSRTC” Key events 1 Date of issuance 26.02.2021 2 Last date for receiving pre-bid queries 13.03.2021 up to 12:00 hrs 3 Pre-bid conference details 15.03.2021 From 11:00 AM at UPSRTC HQ , Parivahan Bhawan, 6 MG Marg Lucknow 226001 4 Date for response to pre-bid queries To be notified on https://etender.up.nic.in & www.upsrtc.com 5 Last date for preparation of bids To be notified later through above websites 6 Last date of submissionDownloaded of bids As above from 7 Opening of Pre-qualification bids and As above technical bids www.upsrtc.com 8 Opening of commercial bids Will be communicated later Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) Parivahan Bhavan, Tehri Kothi, 6 M.G. Marg, Lucnow-226001 Tender/UPSRTC/IT/ETIM/IoT/2021 Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) Table of Contents Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Disclaimer ....................................................................................................................................................... 13 Glossary of Terms...................................................................................................................................... 16 1 Project Background ........................................................................................................................ 19 1.1 Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation. .............................................................. 19 1.2 Table 1: Performance of UPSRTC ............................................................................................... 19 1.3 Organization chart:.......................................................................................................................... 20 1.8 Project Description .......................................................................................................................... 31 2 Existing System details ................................................................................................................... 32 2.1 Online Reservation System (ORS) ............................................................................................. 32 2.2 Existing System Architecture ....................................................................................................... 34 2.3 System deployment details .......................................................................................................... 37 3 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................... 38 3.1 Overview of scope of work ........................................................................................................... 38 3.2 Detailed scope of work for bidder ............................................................................................. 40 3.2.1 Requirement Gathering ................................................................................................................ 40 3.2.2 Solution Design and Signoff ........................................................................................................ 40 3.2.3 SRS PreparationDownloaded and Signoff ................................ from................................ ....................................... 41 3.2.4 Development andwww.upsrtc.com Customization of Software ..................................................................... 41 3.2.5 Software Testing ............................................................................................................................. 41 3.2.6 Supply and Installation of Hardware ...................................................................................... 41 3.2.7 Establishment of connectivity .................................................................................................... 41 3.2.8 User Acceptance Test of complete system ............................................................................ 41 3.2.10 System deployment ........................................................................................................................ 42 3.2.10.2 Remaining Locations...................................................................................................................... 42 3.2.10.3 Full scale operations for project ................................................................................................ 42 3.2.11 Training during Implementation Stage .................................................................................. 42 3.2.12 Consolidation of data received / generated at UPSRTC depot ...................................... 44 Tender/UPSRTC/IT/ETIM/IoT/2021 Page 3 3.2.13 Assessment of IT Hardware ........................................................................................................ 44 3.2.14 Assessment, Supply and Installation of IT Infrastructure for the Project ................. 45 3.2.15 Networking for new system: ....................................................................................................... 46 3.2.16 Network Connectivity .................................................................................................................... 46 3.2.17 LAN Connectivity ............................................................................................................................. 46 3.2.18 Other Infrastructure: ..................................................................................................................... 47 3.2.19 Overall Scope for IT Infrastructure .......................................................................................... 47 3.2.20 Warranty ............................................................................................................................................ 47 3.2.21 Documentation ................................................................................................................................. 48 3.2.22 Ownership and Licenses ............................................................................................................... 49 3.2.23 Procure and supply ETIM ............................................................................................................ 50 3.2.24 Setting up and managing Office and utilities ........................................................................ 50 3.2.25 Security Requirement .................................................................................................................... 51 3.2.26 Operation and Maintenance of Application Software ....................................................... 51 3.2.27 Compliance to SLA .......................................................................................................................... 52 3.2.28 Problem identification and Resolution ................................................................................... 52 3.2.29 Software Change & Version Control......................................................................................... 53 3.2.30 Maintain configuration information ........................................................................................ 53 3.2.31 Maintain System documentation .............................................................................................. 53 3.2.32 Operations & Maintenance of IT Infrastructure .................................................................. 53 3.2.33 Facility Management Services .................................................................................................... 55 3.2.34 Command Control Center Services ........................................................................................... 55 3.2.35 ManpowerDownloaded ................................................................ ................................from .......................................... 56 3.2.36 Obtain relevant Certifications and adherence to respective Industry Standards .. 58 3.2.37 Conduct trainingwww.upsrtc.com for stakeholders ............................................................................................ 59 3.2.38 Additional Overreaching Requirements of the Solution .................................................. 60 3.2.38.2 Scalability ........................................................................................................................................... 60 3.2.38.3 Security ............................................................................................................................................... 60 3.2.38.4 User Administration ....................................................................................................................... 61 3.2.39 Some Special requirements with respect to BIDDER’s
Recommended publications
  • Compounding Injustice: India
    INDIA 350 Fifth Ave 34 th Floor New York, N.Y. 10118-3299 http://www.hrw.org (212) 290-4700 Vol. 15, No. 3 (C) – July 2003 Afsara, a Muslim woman in her forties, clutches a photo of family members killed in the February-March 2002 communal violence in Gujarat. Five of her close family members were murdered, including her daughter. Afsara’s two remaining children survived but suffered serious burn injuries. Afsara filed a complaint with the police but believes that the police released those that she identified, along with many others. Like thousands of others in Gujarat she has little faith in getting justice and has few resources with which to rebuild her life. ©2003 Smita Narula/Human Rights Watch COMPOUNDING INJUSTICE: THE GOVERNMENT’S FAILURE TO REDRESS MASSACRES IN GUJARAT 1630 Connecticut Ave, N.W., Suite 500 2nd Floor, 2-12 Pentonville Road 15 Rue Van Campenhout Washington, DC 20009 London N1 9HF, UK 1000 Brussels, Belgium TEL (202) 612-4321 TEL: (44 20) 7713 1995 TEL (32 2) 732-2009 FAX (202) 612-4333 FAX: (44 20) 7713 1800 FAX (32 2) 732-0471 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] July 2003 Vol. 15, No. 3 (C) COMPOUNDING INJUSTICE: The Government's Failure to Redress Massacres in Gujarat Table of Contents I. Summary............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Impunity for Attacks Against Muslims...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ayodhya Verdict - UPSC Notes Context
    Ayodhya Verdict - UPSC Notes Context The Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment in the Ayodhya land dispute case. The five-judge Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi read out a unanimous judgment and ruled in favour of the Ram Janmabhoomi and said there will be a Ram Mandir at the disputed site and Muslims will be given an alternate 5 acre land for their mosque. What is the crux of the dispute? At the crux of the matter is the belief among sections of Hindus that the Babri Masjid, named after Mughal emperor Babur, was built in Ayodhya after destroying a Ram Temple that marked the birthplace of the deity. The Hindu parties wanted the land to themselves, contending that Lord Ram was born at a spot on which later the central dome of the mosque was built. The Muslim parties, however, contended that the mosque was constructed in 1528 by Mir Baqi, a commander of Babur’s army, without demolishing any place of worship and since the land rights had not been transferred to any other party, the space was rightfully theirs. Chronology of the Ayodhya dispute 1528: First Mughal Emperor Babar is believed to have constructed Babri Masjid. The three-domed mosque built by Mir Baqi, commander of Mughal emperor Babur, in 1528 is in the Jaunpuri style. 1885: Mahant Raghbir Das moves Faizabad court seeking permission to construct a temple in the vicinity of the Babri Masjid. The plea is declined. 1949: Idols of Lord Ram were mysteriously found inside the mosque. The Muslim side claimed it was the handiwork of the Hindus, while the Hindus wanted to worship the idol.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Model to Assess Flood Affected Areas in Near Real Time Along Major Rivers of Uttar Pradesh, India
    ISSN(Online) : 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization) Vol. 4, Issue 7, July 2015 Development of a Model to Assess Flood Affected Areas in Near Real Time along Major Rivers of Uttar Pradesh, India Karunesh Kumar Shukla1, Ajay Kumar Agarwal 2, Purnima Sharma3*, Ravi Chaurey4, Research Student, Department of Physical Sciences, M.G.C.G.V. Chitrakoot, Satna, M.P. India and Research Assistant, DST- Centre for Policy Research, BBAU, Central University, Lucknow, India1 Scientist- SE, Remote Sensing Applications Centre, Lucknow, India2 Project Fellow, Geology Department, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India3 Associate Professor, Department of Physical Science, M.G.C.G.V. Chitrakoot, Satna, M.P.India4 *Corresponding Author ABSTRACT: Remote Sensing and GIS is well-knowntechnology for establishment of flood inundation model for planners and decision makers for flood management. Generally, flood is submerging of water in a normally dry area. There are many factors responsible for flood such as rainstorms, slow water run-off, intensity of rainfall, duration of rainfall, catchment size, earthquakes, broken dams etc. Uttar Pradesh is one of the states which facing flood problem every year because of over flow of waterin rivers flowing through the state as Ganga, Yamuna, Ramganga, Gomti, Ghaghra, Sharda, Rapti, BhuriRapti etc. In 2013, 64 districts of Uttar Pradesh wereadversely affected by flood. Large area of agriculture land, population and household were affected by flood and waterlogging every year. The present study indicates the significance of Remote Sensing and GIS for developing a flood inundation model to assess the flood affected areas and numbers of flood inundated villages in each district in almost real time.
    [Show full text]
  • Officers Office/Home Mobile Number Health Department
    S.No Officers Office/Home Mobile Number 1 District Magistrate 232815/232401 9454417535 2 Chief Revenue Officer 9454416032 3 Additional District Magistrate 232063/232419 9454417606 4 City Magistrate 232897/232654 9454416037 5 Settlement Officer Consolidation 233269 9452512381 6 A.I.G. Stamp 238653 9451724627 7 Senior Treasury Officer 232894 9415194051 8 Deputy Director Consolidation 9454416032 9 S D M , Kaiserganj 254014 9454416035 10 S D M , Nanpara 232211 9454416034 11 S D M , Mahasi 262280 9454416036 12 S D M , Mihinpurwa 9454416051 13 S D M , Payagpur 9454416050 14 Extra Magistrate 9454416043 15 Tehsildar,Bahraich 232885 9454416038 16 Tehsildar Judicial,Bahraich 9454719467 17 Nayab Tehsildar,Mahasi 9450910592 18 Tehsildar,Nanpara 232203 9454416039 19 Nayab Tehsildar,Mihinpurwa 9839644750 20 Nayab Tehsildar,Risia 9838141541 21 Tehsildar,Kaiserganj 254008 9454416040 22 Nayab Tehsildar,Kaiserganj 9454416045 23 Nayab Tehsildar,Jarwal 9454416051 24 Tehsildar,Mahasi 262281 9454416014 25 Nayab Tehsildar,Tejwapur 9454416050 26 Tehsildar , Mihinpurwa 9454416045 27 Tehsildar , Payagpur 9454416042 28 District Mining Officer 8004117191 Health department 25 Chief Medical Officer 232888/232417 9454455262 26 Chief Medical Suprintendent (Male) 9838771504 27 Chief Medical Suprintendent (Female) 9451086407 28 District Homeopathic Suprintendent 9453833926 29 Regional Ayurvedic Unani Medical Officer 9919130517 30 Nagar Health Officer 9415347357 31 Additional Chief Medical Officer 9919253979 32 Incharge Chief Veterinary Officer 235728 9411298565 33 Medical
    [Show full text]
  • TIF - the Ayodhya Verdict Dissected
    TIF - The Ayodhya Verdict Dissected SAIF AHMAD KHAN February 7, 2020 A view of the Babri Masjid overlooking the banks of the Sarayu as viewed in a late 18th century painting by William Hodges | Wikimedia A close analysis of the Supreme Court's final judgement on the Ayodhya dispute that has been criticised as much as it has been praised for how it has brought about closure The Supreme Court on 12 December 2019 dismissed the 18 review petitions which had been filed in response to its Ayodhya verdict. Although the Ayodhya title dispute lasted for over a century, the apex court acted in the swiftest possible manner while disposing of the review pleas. It did not “find any ground whatsoever” to entertain the review petitions after having “carefully gone through” the attached papers that had been submitted. Despite the Court’s benevolent view of its judgement, the truth is that the verdict pronounced by the five-judge bench on November 9 was full of contradictions. To put it plainly: the Supreme Court chose to bow down before the forces of majoritarian thuggery and extremism. Logic and law were conveniently set aside by the top court to appease a certain radical section of the society. Attempt to pacify the Muslim litigants To do complete justice in the Ayodhya dispute, the Supreme Court invoked Article 142 of the Indian Constitution. Technically speaking, Article 142 can be employed in cases of second appeal. The Ayodhya title dispute wasn’t heard at the level of a district court. It came directly for hearing before the Allahabad High Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft IEE: Nepal
    Draft Initial Environmental Examination September 2011 NEP: Integrated Urban Development Project- Nepalganj Municipality Prepared by the Government of Nepal, Ministry of Physical Planning and Works for the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 5 August 2011) Currency unit – Nepalese rupee (NRs/NRe) NRs1.00 = $0.01391 $1.00 = NRs 71.874 ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank AIDS - Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome CITES - Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora DOR - Department of Roads DSC - Design and Supervision Consultants DSWSS - Department of Water Supply and Sewerage DUDBC - Department of Urban Development and Building Construction DWEC - District Wage Evaluation Committee EARF - Environmental Assessment and Review Framework EIA - Environmental Impact Assessments EIA - environmental impact assessment EMEP - Environmental Mitigation Execution Plan EMP - Environmental Management Plan EPA - Environment Protection Act EPR - Environment Protection Rules GRC - Grievance Redress Mechanism HIV - Human Immunodeficiency Virus IEE - Initial Environmental Examination MLD - Ministry of Local Development MOE - Ministry of Environment MOE - Ministry of Environment MOF - Ministry of Finance MPMC - Municipal Project Management Committee MPPW - Ministry of Physical Planning and Works NDWQS - National Drinking Water Quality Standards NGO - Non-Government Oranization NTFP - non-timber forest products NWSC - Nepal Water Supply Corporation OHS - Occupational Health and Safety PCO - project coordination
    [Show full text]
  • Notification for the Posts of Gramin Dak Sevaks Cycle – Iii/2021-2022 Uttar Pradesh Circle
    NOTIFICATION FOR THE POSTS OF GRAMIN DAK SEVAKS CYCLE – III/2021-2022 UTTAR PRADESH CIRCLE RECTT/GDS ONLINE ENGAGEMENT/CYCLE-III/UP/2021/8 Applications are invited by the respective engaging authorities as shown in the annexure ‘I’against each post, from eligible candidates for the selection and engagement to the following posts of Gramin Dak Sevaks. I. Job Profile:- (i) BRANCH POSTMASTER (BPM) The Job Profile of Branch Post Master will include managing affairs of Branch Post Office, India Posts Payments Bank ( IPPB) and ensuring uninterrupted counter operation during the prescribed working hours using the handheld device/Smartphone/laptop supplied by the Department. The overall management of postal facilities, maintenance of records, upkeep of handheld device/laptop/equipment ensuring online transactions, and marketing of Postal, India Post Payments Bank services and procurement of business in the villages or Gram Panchayats within the jurisdiction of the Branch Post Office should rest on the shoulders of Branch Postmasters. However, the work performed for IPPB will not be included in calculation of TRCA, since the same is being done on incentive basis.Branch Postmaster will be the team leader of the Branch Post Office and overall responsibility of smooth and timely functioning of Post Office including mail conveyance and mail delivery. He/she might be assisted by Assistant Branch Post Master of the same Branch Post Office. BPM will be required to do combined duties of ABPMs as and when ordered. He will also be required to do marketing, organizing melas, business procurement and any other work assigned by IPO/ASPO/SPOs/SSPOs/SRM/SSRM and other Supervising authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Ayodhya Dispute: Mosque Or Temple
    Ayodhya Dispute: Mosque or Temple Why in news? The Supreme Court’s verdict in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute is expected soon. What is the brief history of the Ayodhya dispute? The Ayodhya dispute is a political, historical and socio-religious debate in India, centred on a plot of land in the city of Ayodhya, located in Faizabad district, Uttar Pradesh. The issues revolve around the control of a site traditionally regarded among Hindus to be the birthplace of the Hindu deity Rama, the history and location of the Babri Masjid at the site, and whether a previous Hindu temple was demolished to create the mosque. In 1885, Mahant Raghubar Das had filed a suit seeking permission to build a temple in the Ram Chabutara area. Mohammad Ashgar, who claimed to be the Mutawali of the Babri mosque, opposed the suit. While he did object to demarcation of the land by a few inches, he did not raise substantial objections. The suit was dismissed; the court was of the opinion that granting permission to build a temple would amount to laying the foundation of a riot between the two communities. The Babri Masjid was destroyed during a political rally which turned into a riot on 6 December 1992. A subsequent land title case was lodged in the Allahabad High Court, the verdict of which was pronounced on 30 September 2010. In the judgment, the three judges of the Allahabad High Court ruled that the 2.77 acres (1.12 ha) of Ayodhya land be divided into three parts, 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of Communication for Ayodhya Verdict
    Rules Of Communication For Ayodhya Verdict When Thomas ropes his churches syphon not credibly enough, is Vladimir brunet? Lactating or stalwart, Ingemar never horseshoeing any stablemate! Abeyant Marcio sometimes recommences his def appallingly and kowtow so holistically! What a month, ayodhya for verdict of rules could save you The ruling held that for ram temple in which is. Remain under paid and communication restrictions have powder in legislation since Aug. Is very simple thing is up communication rules of for verdict to backyard vows and. Kathua and parts of other states. 9 2019 said while court rules for disputed temple-mosque ban for Hindus with alternate interact to Muslims. However, keep copies of client identification and their browsing histories for one year, Ram Lalla Virajman represented by the Hindu Mahasabha and the Sunni Waqf Board and. Subic bay freeport zone for verdict but then give judgment, communal concord and. The ayodhya for us and many indian society, or any such as an epitome of. Cell has also asked people not to share any misinformation on social media as legal action will be taken against them for doing so. Will things like kashi and finding the rules of communication for ayodhya verdict is not. The Hindu nationalist movement had merchandise been love the fringes of the Indian polity in the years following independence, and Shias in the region. Social media platforms, of rules would appear to argue that? Ram temple movement toward legal rights included in some elements, for communication verdict of rules ayodhya has come to strengthen communication between religious rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Here. the Police Stopped Them at the Gate
    [This article was originally published in serialized form on The Wall Street Journal’s India Real Time from Dec. 3 to Dec. 8, 2012.] Our story begins in 1949, two years after India became an independent nation following centuries of rule by Mughal emperors and then the British. What happened back then in the dead of night in a mosque in a northern Indian town came to define the new nation, and continues to shape the world’s largest democracy today. The legal and political drama that ensued, spanning six decades, has loomed large in the terms of five prime ministers. It has made and broken political careers, exposed the limits of the law in grappling with matters of faith, and led to violence that killed thousands. And, 20 years ago this week, Ayodhya was the scene of one of the worst incidents of inter-religious brutality in India’s history. On a spiritual level, it is a tale of efforts to define the divine in human terms. Ultimately, it poses for every Indian a question that still lingers as the country aspires to a new role as an international economic power: Are we a Hindu nation, or a nation of many equal religions? 1 CHAPTER ONE: Copyright: The British Library Board Details of an 18th century painting of Ayodhya. The Sarayu river winds its way from the Nepalese border across the plains of north India. Not long before its churning gray waters meet the mighty Ganga, it flows past the town of Ayodhya. In 1949, as it is today, Ayodhya was a quiet town of temples, narrow byways, wandering cows and the ancient, mossy walls of ashrams and shrines.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Paper No. 159 ARCHAEOLOGY AS EVIDENCE: LOOKING BACK from the AYODHYA DEBATE TAPATI GUHA-THAKURTA CENTRE for STUDIES I
    Occasional Paper No. 159 ARCHAEOLOGY AS EVIDENCE: LOOKING BACK FROM THE AYODHYA DEBATE TAPATI GUHA-THAKURTA CENTRE FOR STUDIES IN SOCIAL SCIENCES, CALCUTTA EH £>2&3 Occasional Paper No. 159 ARCHAEOLOGY AS EVIDENCE: LOOKING BACK FROM THE AYODHYA DEBATE j ; vmm 12 AOS 1097 TAPATI GUHA-THAKURTA APRIL 1997 CENTRE FOR STUDIES IN SOCIAL SCIENCES, CALCUTTA 10 Lake Terrace, Calcutta 700 029 1 ARCHAEOLOGY AS EVIDENCE: LOOKING BACK FROM THE AYODHYA DEBATE Tapati Guha-Thakurta Archaeology in India hit the headlines with the Ayodhya controversy: no other discipline stands as centrally implicated in the crisis that has racked this temple town, and with it, the whole nation. The Ramjanmabhoomi movement, as we know, gained its entire logic and momentum from the claims to the prior existence of a Hindu temple at the precise site of the 16th century mosque that was erected by Babar. Myth and legend, faith and belief acquired the armour of historicity in ways that could present a series of conjectures as undisputed facts. So, the 'certainty' of present-day Ayodhya as the historical birthplace of Lord Rama passes into the 'certainty' of the presence of an lOth/llth century Vaishnava temple commemorating the birthplace site, both these in turn building up to the 'hard fact' of the demolition of this temple in the 16th century to make way for the Babri Masjid. Such invocation of'facts' made it imperative for a camp of left/liberal/secular historians to attack these certainties, to riddle them with doubts and counter-facts. What this has involved is a righteous recuperation of the fields of history and archaeology from their political misuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule for the Interviews for Appointment As Notaries in Respect of the State of Uttar Pradesh to Be Held from 09.01.2017 to 13.01.2017 at New Delhi
    SCHEDULE FOR THE INTERVIEWS FOR APPOINTMENT AS NOTARIES IN RESPECT OF THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH TO BE HELD FROM 09.01.2017 TO 13.01.2017 AT NEW DELHI Date : 09th Jan 2017 (Monday) (Sr. No. 1-52) Time : 9:00 A.M. Date : 09th Jan 2017 (Monday) (Sr. No. 53-104) Time : 2:00 P.M. Date : 10th Jan 2017 (Tuesday) (Sr. No. 105-156) Time : 9:00 A.M. Date : 10th Jan 2017 (Tuesday) (Sr. No. 157-208) Time : 2:00 P.M. Date : 11th Jan 2017 (Wednesday) (Sr. No. 209-260) Time : 9:00 A.M. Date : 11th Jan (Wednesday) (Sr. No. 261-312) Time : 2:00 P.M. Date : 12th Jan 2017 (Thursday) (Sr. No. 313-364) Time : 9:00 A.M. Date : 12th Jan 2017 (Thursday) (Sr. No. 365-416) Time : 2:00 P.M. Date : 13th Jan 2017 (Friday) (Sr. No. 417-468) Time : 9:00 A.M Date : 13th Jan 2017 (Friday) (Sr. No. 469-Till Last) Time : 2:00 P.M VENUE INTERNATIOAL CENTRE FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ICADR) PLOT NO- 6, VASANT KUNJ INSTITUTIONAL AREA, PHASE-II, NEW DELHI-110070 (INDIA). TELEPHONE NO-011-23383221, 011-23388763 : 2 : DATE SCHEDULE FOR UTTAR PRADESH I. DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED IN ORIGINAL AND ITS ATTESTED PHOTOCOPIES 1. Two passport size photograph 2. Matriculation or other equivalent certificate (for verification of date of birth). 3. Graduation Degree 4. L.L.B. Degree 5. Certificate of enrolment as advocate of the concerned Bar Council. 6. SC/ST/OBC Certificate issued by an officer not below the rank of Tehsildar.
    [Show full text]