ROOFING Town of Riverhead Landmarks Preservation Commission GUIDELINES for ROOFING
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
NEW ORLEANS NOSTALGIA Remembering New Orleans History, Culture and Traditions
NEW ORLEANS NOSTALGIA Remembering New Orleans History, Culture and Traditions By Ned Hémard They All Taxed For You: Shotguns, Camelbacks and More The Louvre in Paris, the Cabildo and Presbytère in the French Quarter, 1960s motor hotels, Lake Avenue apartments and early “Popeye’s Fried Chicken” outlets have what in common? The answer, of course, is the Mansard roof. After all, what exemplifies this architectural style more faithfully than Hawaiian black lava rock topped with red synthetic roof tiles? Architects and the late Al Copeland may have disagreed on this subject, but the history of the Mansard is still most interesting. The Mansard roof refers to a type of hip roof with two slopes on each of its four sides with the lower slope being much steeper, virtually vertical. The upper slope is usually not visible from the ground and is pitched just enough to shed water. For all intents and purposes, this is an additional story disguised as a roof. Sometimes, for decorative effect, the pitch is curved with impressive dormers. In modern commercial construction, the upper pitch has often been substituted with a flat roof. The Cabildo in New Orleans Mansard elevation, 1868 The architect, Francois Mansart (1598 - 1666), popularized the roof style known as Mansard, a misspelling of his name. The central portico of the Richelieu Wing of the Louvre is a fine example. In the years that French houses were taxed by the number of floors beneath the roof, the Mansard style afforded a clever way to avoid paying the tax collector. A revival of Mansard occurred in the 1850s rebuilding of Paris, and that era is called Second Empire. -
Glossary of Architectural Terms Apex
Glossary of Architectural Terms Apex: The highest point or peak in the gable Column: A vertical, cylindrical or square front. supporting member, usually with a classical Arcade: A range of spaces supported on piers capital. or columns, generally standing away from a wall Coping: The capping member of a wall or and often supporting a roof or upper story. parapet. Arch: A curved construction that spans an Construction: The act of adding to a structure opening and supports the weight above it. or the erection of a new principal or accessory Awning: Any roof like structure made of cloth, structure to a property or site. metal, or other material attached to a building Cornice: The horizontal projecting part crowning and erected over a window, doorway, etc., in the wall of a building. such a manner as to permit its being raised or Course: A horizontal layer or row of stones retracted to a position against the building, when or bricks in a wall. This can be projected or not in use. recessed. The orientation of bricks can vary. Bay: A compartment projecting from an exterior Cupola: A small structure on top of a roof or wall containing a window or set of windows. building. Bay Window: A window projecting from the Decorative Windows: Historic windows that body of a building. A “squared bay” has sides at possess special architectural value, or contribute right angles to the building; a “slanted bay” has to the building’s historic, cultural, or aesthetic slanted sides, also called an “octagonal” bay. If character. Decorative windows are those with segmental or semicircular in plan, it is a “bow” leaded glass, art glass, stained glass, beveled window. -
Draft Mansard Roof Guidance 201115
London Borough of Tower Hamlets DRAFT MANSARD ROOF GUIDANCE NOTE Draft for consultation November 2015 0 Draft Mansard Roof Guidance Purpose of this consultation The purpose of the Mansard Roof Guidance Note is to support residents who would like to make a planning application for a new mansard roof in one of the Borough’s Conservation Areas. The Draft Mansard Roof Guidance Note contains information on the most relevant planning policies that the Council must consider when making decision on planning applications; the character of historic roofs in Tower Hamlets; the elements of Mansard Roofs and best practice advice on how you should approach the design of a new mansard roof in a conservation area; and finally, the document includes some helpful tips for you to refer to when making a planning application for a new mansard roof in a Conservation Area. In order to assist residents with planning application process, officers have also examined the following eight Conservation Areas in more detail to identify the best opportunities for properties to extend: Driffield Road; Medway; Fairfield Road; Victoria Park; Jesus Hospital Estate; York Square; Chapel House; and Tredegar Square. Officer recommendations have been presented in draft addendum to the relevant Conservation Area Character Appraisals. These addendums are also subject to consultation from 23 November 2015 and 18 January 2016. More information on these can be found via the links and contact details below. How you can get involved It is important that this Guidance Note is easy to understand and useful. If you feel that this document could be improved and the information better communicated, we would be grateful for your feedback during the public consultation. -
Living Tradition Adding to Our Heritage with More Homes and Sustainable Intensification Living Tradition
Create Streets Briefing Paper August 2021 Samuel Hughes Living tradition Adding to our heritage with more homes and sustainable intensification Living Tradition Foreword by Christopher Boyle QC Former Chairman of the Georgian Group (2015-2020) The mansard is one of the defining features of the Georgian and Victorian skyline. In eighteenth and nineteenth century Britain, the right of property owners to add mansards went without question: the idea that local governments would one day forbid them would have been viewed with puzzlement. The form of mansards was, however, tightly controlled by a series of Building Acts which governed their height, inclines and materials, as well as regulating their parapets, party walls, chimney stacks and dormers. These regulations led to a distinctive British tradition of mansard design, readily distinguished from those of France or Germany. This fascinating report proposes that we allow this great tradition to be revived. On terraces on which some of the buildings have mansards already, owners of the remaining buildings would enjoy a presumption in favour of permission to add new ones, provided that they followed a design guide ensuring that the new mansards conformed to the best traditions of historic mansard design. On terraces on which none of the buildings have mansards yet, residents would be able to vote for the right to add them, with the same proviso. It is profoundly important that we cherish our architectural heritage, a cause on which I worked during my five years as Chairman of the Georgian Group. Cherishing this heritage involves fighting the demolition of historic buildings, just as it involves fighting alterations that would damage their character. -
ROOFS a Guide to Alterations and Extensions on Domestic Buildings
PLEASE NOTE The Unitary Development Plan (UDP) policies and planning, building control and other legislation and regulations referred to in the text of this guide were current at the time of publication. Because this guidance is an electronic version of the printed guidance as approved and adopted, these references have NOT been changed. For ease of contact; names, telephone numbers and locations have been regarded as non-material editorial changes and have been updated. As UDP policies and government legislation may have changed over time, before carrying out any work, it is recommended that you consult the current UDP http://www.westminster.gov.uk/planningandlicensing/udp/index.cfm for policy revisions and you may wish to check with planning and/or building control officers about your proposals. ROOFS A Guide to Alterations and Extensions on Domestic Buildings c:\documents and settings\chris\my documents\webspgs\roofsweb.doc\0 26/11/2004 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Legislation 3. History 4. Unitary Development Plan Policies 5. The Design Of Roof Alterations and Extensions Setting Out General Rules Party Wall Upstands Cornices, Parapets and Balustrades Roof Coverings Parapet Gutters Chimney Stacks and Pots Dormer Windows: Number and Positioning Dormer Design Rooflights Fire Escapes Roof Level Plant Pipework Roof Terraces End of Terrace Projections from the Building Line 6. Special Cases Semi-Detached Houses With Parapets Overhanging and Gabled Roofs Gaps Between Buildings Butterfly Roofs 7. Contracts 8. Other Guidance c:\documents and settings\chris\my documents\webspgs\roofsweb.doc\0 26/11/2004 1. INTRODUCTION Alterations and extensions are often necessary to modernise, adapt, enlarge or extend the life of a building. -
Air in (Intake Vents). Air out (Exhaust Vents). That's Attic Ventilation in A
Air in (intake vents). Air out (exhaust vents). That’s attic ventilation in a nutshell. But it’s not always that simple depending on the complexity of the roof’s configuration. We asked roofing contractors who attend our best practices in residential attic ventilation seminars: "What roofs are the most challenging to properly ventilate and why?" These roofers did not design the houses, nor did they build them. But they were hired to replace the roofs and address the attic ventilation. To help fight potentially damaging heat and moisture buildup inside an attic as well as ice dams in cold climates, attic ventilation should be a balanced system of intake vents (in the soffit/overhang or low on the roof) and exhaust vents (at or near the roof’s peak). The following types of roofs were identified as particularly challenging to achieve balanced attic ventilation. As you’re about to read, roofing contractors do the best with the cards they’ve been dealt. FROM LEFT: Hip roof with hip ridge vents diagonally; hip roof with power fan; hip roof with ridge vents both horizontally and diagonally. Hip Roofs A “hip roof” has limited or no horizontal roof peak (ridge) but does have multiple diagonal “hips.” Hip roofs often have elevation changes from the peak of one portion of the roof to the next portion below. Roofing contractors refer to it as a “cut up roof.” One of the reasons this roof type is challenging is its design does not automatically allow the use of horizontal ridge vents for exhaust. Many contractors prefer and are accustomed to using horizontal ridge vents. -
Prevailing Wage Rates System Annual Adjusted July 1St Rates
Details of Prevailing Wage Rates by Town Page 1 of7 Prevailing Wage Rates System Annual Adjusted July 1st Rates I>.9L WeJLSite 0 Wag!Lal1.d_W-9rkpJ~ce-.issuJ!_~0 Wage Rate~ 0 Building Rates - Hartford Building Rates - Hartford (effective July 1, 2009) Classification Hourly Rate Benefits 1a) Asbestos Worker/Insulator (Includes application of insulating materials, protective coverings, coatings, & finishes to all types of mechanical systems; application of firestopping material for wall openings & $34.21 19.81 penetrations in walls, floors, ceilings - Last updated 9/1/08 1b) AsbestosjToxic Waste Removal Laborers: Asbestos removal and encapsulation (except its removal from mechanical systems which are not to be scrapped), toxic waste removers, blasters. **See Laborers Group 7** 2) Boilermaker $33.79 34%19.48+16.9819.1214.788.96+ a 3a) Bricklayer, Cement Mason, Concrete Finisher (including caulking), Plasterers, Stone Masons$30.91$24.90$30.78$32.10 3b) Tile Setter 3c) Terrazzo Workers, Marble Setters - Last updated 10/1/08 3d) Tile, Marble & Terrazzo Finishers http://www2.ctdo1.state.ct.us/W ageRates Web/W ageRatesbyTown.aspx?Town= Hartford 10/13/2009 Details of Prevailing Wage Rates by Town Page 2 ot7 3e) Plasterer $32.10 19.48 ------LABORERS------ 4) Group 1: Laborers (common or general), carpenter tenders, wrecking laborers, fire watchers. $24.25 14.45 4a) Group 2: Mortar mixers, plaster tender, power buggy operators, powdermen, $24.50 14.45 fireproofer/mixer/nozzleman, fence erector. 4b) Group 3: Jackhammer operators, mason tender (brick) -
Roof Alterations & Extensions
Roof SPGBH Alterations & note 1 Extensions What is an SPG? A Supplementary Planning Guidance Note (SPG) is one of many material considerations that can be taken into account when determining a planning application. It is intended to provide helpful guidance for the developer, consistent with the provisions of the statutory Local Plan. This SPG Note is one of a series produced by the Environmental Services Department and it is to be read in conjunction with the Council’s statutory local plan(s). The guidance is also based on that contained in the Government’s Planning Policy Guidance Note PPG15 – Planning and the Historic Environment, and English Heritage’s Listed Buildings Guidance Leaflets on Mansard Roofs and Dormers. This Guidance Note was approved by the Land Use, Transportation and Highways Management Sub-Committee on 24th February 1999 following public consultation and consequential amendment, as a material consideration for the purposes of development control. It supplements policies BE1, BE5, BE6, BE8, BE9, BE12 and BE19 of the Hove Borough Local Plan 1995, policies ENV.1, ENV.3, ENV.5, ENV.6, ENV.22, ENV.31 and ENV.40 of the Brighton Borough Local Plan 1995 and policies B.2, B.16, B.19 and B.20 of the Brighton and Hove Local Plan Review Part A, which was published for development control purposes in 1997. Introduction It is the firm belief of the Council that good design should be the aim of any alterations and additions throughout Brighton and Hove. Poorly designed or excessively bulky roof top additions can seriously harm the appearance of the property and in some cases decrease its value. -
Roofer's Guide
ROOFER’S GUIDE 2020 EDITION 2020 ROOFER’S GUIDE INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION The quality of a roofing system depends on several factors that must function together towards a common objective: ensuring the long-term performance of the waterproofing complex. The main role of a roof is to keep the building dry and protect it from the weather. In addition, the roof assembly must be designed to ensure continuous waterproofing through all elements of the building envelope. The point of contact of the roof and wall vapour barriers as well as the waterproofing of the various projections must therefore be addressed with the same care as the sealing of the roof field surface. The roof must withstand condensation and water vapour migration as well as rainfalls in order to prevent the assembly components from being contaminated. In addition to protecting against rainfall and vapour migration, the assembly components must be stable and well fastened to the structure. The fastening and adhesion methods must allow the assembly to withstand thermal cycles and live loads in order to limit the material deformation that could compromise the waterproofing. Beyond stability of the materials, the roof system must bear the normal negative pressures exerted by the wind. In order for a roof to meet long-term performance objectives while working as expected, other factors may be considered: The appropriate selection of materials The correct design of the assembly The proper installation of assembly components The regular maintenance of the roof The main purpose of the Roofer’s Guide is to present the best practices regarding the installation of an SBS-modified membrane system as recommended by SOPREMA. -
Bottom to Roots to Roof Remodel Top Turns a Flawed House Into a Showplace
PROJECT SPOTLIGHT PROJECT SPOTLIGHT BOTTOM to Roots to roof remodel TOP turns a flawed house into a showplace By Wendy A. Jordan, Senior Contributing Editor hy not stop by?” thought Mary White. She and husband Bill White were re- searching remodelers for their 1953 split level, and a Remodelers Showcase W home — a project completed by Minneapolis design-build company TreHus Architects+Interior Designers+Builders — was just a mile down the street. She went to see the house, and something clicked. “I was impressed by the work,” recalls White, as well as “by the demeanor and profession- alism” of the TreHus representatives. They were not aggressive, but they were there to help and to show off their nice work. It was the right approach for me.” Two years later and after a bold residential transformation, White had praise for another Showcase home remodeled by TreHus — her own. No place but up The existing four-level, 2,032-square-foot house was no match for its outstanding location. In a sought-after neighborhood convenient to downtown Minneapolis, the property directly overlooked the Mississippi River. But the house failed to capture that view. Besides, the rooms were small, storage was poor, the kitchen was outdated and isolated, and there was no powder room. When the roof over the family room — a 1980s addition by the previous owner — began leaking and shingles started falling off, “We knew we couldn’t put off replacing the roof,” BEFORE White says. As long as that work was going to be done, the Whites decided to pursue “a cohesive plan to update the entire house.” Top of the wish list was a master suite. -
Roofer Falls 20 Feet Through Rotten Roof
CONSTRUCTION INJURY NARRATIVE Roofer Falls 20 Feet through Rotten Roof INCIDENT FACTS REPORT #: 71-190-2020s REPORT DATE: January 6, 2020 INCIDENT DATE: September 3, 2016 VICTIM: 39 years old INDUSTRY: Roofing contractors OCCUPATION: Roofer SCENE: Storage building at manufacturing plant EVENT TYPE: Fall INJURY NARRATIVE A 39-year-old roofer was severely injured when he fell 20 feet through a rotten roof. He had 22 years of experience in the roofing industry and had been with his employer, a roofing contractor, for a year. He was a member of a four-person crew that had been tearing-off and replacing the flat (low pitch) roof of a manufacturing storage facility for a month. On the day of the incident, they were working to remove three layers of roofing materials to check for rotten spots. REPORT #: 71-190-2020s INJURY NARRATIVE Warning lines were set up near the roof’s edges and a safety monitor was used. Workers were not required to use personal fall protection while inside the warning lines. Outside of the warning lines, they were required to use a personal fall arrest system consisting of a full body harness with ropes tied-off to anchor points. Most of the visible rotten roof was in the area outside of the warning lines. The roofer was inside the warning lines near the roof ridge using a shovel to scrape off shingles and insulation. As he stepped backward, a patch of rotten roof gave way and he fell through, landing 20 feet below on wood flooring. He was severely injured and suffered numerous fractures and internal injuries. -
The History of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers
The History of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers From the time man first emerged from the natural shelter of the cave, a roof has been the symbol of home and hearth. The primitive grass or twig roof bears little resemblance to modern roofing, yet it represents the first step in the evolutionary process that led to the development of protective covers that today we take for granted. In primitive days, it was important that every man know how to provide his family with shelter. A nomadic existence necessitated rapid construction of a protective cover. But, as men settled into more structured living, skilled craftsmen turned to constructing homes, where the protective cover was the roof. Such tradesmen were in great demand in those earlier times when a thatched roof required frequent repair due to weather and war. The development of roofing has paralleled the development of new structures needed for an increasingly permanent and stable population. As part of the systems and materials devised to protect homes from the elements, a special group of building tradesmen has evolved to meet today's roofing needs -- the journeymen roofers. Along with the waterproofers, their union brothers, these skilled craftsmen ensure that homes and businesses are protected from nature's whims. Where roofers sought to protect structures from the elements, they had little protection themselves. They were exposed not only to the elements on the job but to ruthless employers who felt little need to treat tradesmen with fairness and respect. These conditions persisted until the turn of the 20th century when two organizations were formed to represent roofers and related tradesmen.