Future R'si. .Nti. Development in Cen Ral HB D'strict

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Future R'si. .Nti. Development in Cen Ral HB D'strict Future R'Si. .nti. Development in Cen ral HB D'strict April20Z5 Report Prepared by Sean Be vin, Consulting Economic Analyst Economic Solutions Ltd, Napier Erno": sean bevin econom CSolut ons co nz Executive Summary In July 2014, Economic Solutions Ltd (ESL) prepared a report for the Council concerning the long-term demographic and economic growth outlook for the Central Hawkes Bay District, covering the period 2014-2046. ESL has subsequently been requested by the Council to provide additional analysis supplementing the contents of the above report, concerning the anticipated location within the district and associated amount of new residential housing development during the long-term projection period. The analysis in the report again relates to the two projection scenarios used in last year's report, namely the 'Status Quo' scenario reflecting a continuation of underlying historical demographic growth patterns in the district and the 'RWSS' scenario incorporating the potential demographic impacts over the projection period of the major Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme. As with last year's report, Statistics NZ's Medium or 'middle of the road' population projection has been used as the basis for preparing the Status Quo household growth projection. The High or most optimistic population projection of SNZ has been used for preparing the 'with RWSS' household projection beyond year 2026. Both projection scenarios also continue the historical trend of falling household occupancy, over the 2013-2046 period. The projection period covered by the analysis comprises two parts, specifically the next Long Term Plan interval 20/5/16 to 2025/26 and the following 20-yearinterval. In the latter regard, it is noted that this follow-up report updates last year's population and household growth projections (which were based on the 2006 Census results) taking into account the latest Statistics New Zealand (SNZ) sub-national population projections based on 2013 Census results. It is also noted that as SNZ's latest population projections only cover the period out to Year 2043, ESL's population and household growth projections contained in this supplementary report have been extrapolated out to 2046. Table A below summarises the latest household growth projections for the Central Hawkes Bay District for the 2013-2046 period, for both the Status Quo and RWSS scenarios. The figures in the table indicate that under the Status Quo projection scenario, the total number of households in the District increases by 549 or 10% over 2015-2026 and by 554 or 9.3% over 2026-2046. With the RWSS, the total number of households in the District also increases by 549 or logy. over 2015-2026 (the same as for the Status Quo scenario) but by 1,280 or 21% over 2026-2046. The RWSS results in a total of 7,250 households in the District by year 2046, 726 or 11% more households than the Status Quo projection situation. TABLE A: 2013 CENSUS BASED STATUS Quo AND RWSS HOUSEHOLD GROWTH PROJECTIONS FOR CHBD 2013-2046 Projected Households Year Status Quo RWSS 20.3 Base Actuals 5,333 5,333 20.5 5,421 5,421 2026 5,970 5,970 2046 6,524 7,250 Assuming a continuation over the 2013-2026 projection period of the overall historical locational profile of new residential development in the District, the leading broad residential growth localities for the period are expected to be the Waipukurau, Elsthorpe-Fleming ton, Tikokino and Waipawa Census Area Units (CAUs), in this order. In addition, the general historical profile of housing growth in the district (whereby 55% of total new dwellings have been located adjacent to, on the fringe of or within the main urban zones, 30% have been rural residential including rural townships and lifestyle housing, and the balance coastal developments) is also assumed for the period under the Status Quo projection scenario. Over the 2026-2045 period, the additional household growth in the District is also concentrated in the Waipukurau, Elsthorpe-Flemington, Tikokino and Waipawa CAU areas, in this order. If the RWSS proceeds, the report is of the view that given the current timing of the construction period for the project and the initial years of its evolving operation, the Scheme is unlikely to have a significant impact on new housing demand in the district over the next LTP period (201 5-2026). It is anticipated that housing requirements associated with the construction of the Scheme will be met largely from existing available accommodation supply in the District such as rental housing and visitor/community accommodation, as well as possibly the construction of temporary accommodation for the construction workforce. Consequently, the report considers that the Status Quo/Medium household growth projection scenario should also suffice for the next LTP period involving the construction and initial operation of the RWSS. However, the Council should closely monitor new housing growth in the District during the period, in order to assess the extent to which it is aligned with the Medium projection scenario for the period. Whilst the initial years of operation of the RWSS during the second half of the next LTP period are not expected to see any major change from the existing broad locational profile of residential development in the district, the years following could see emerging trends such as increased housing demand 'on farm' or in close proximity to farms being serviced by the RWSS, increased rural-residential or small rural town housing demand (particularly in the Tikokino CAU area) and increased housing demand within and around the main urban centres of Waipukurau and Waipawa. Over the 2026-2046 period, the leading areas of new housing growth in the District with the RWSS project are, in order, Elsthorpe-Fleming ton, Waipukurau, Waipawa and Tikokino. Over the 201 3-2046 period, the Median age of the CHBD population is currently projected to increase from 43.1 to 54.3 years under the Statistics NZ Medium population growth scenario, with the 65+ population more than doubling. At this time, the impact of the RWSS on the District's population is envisaged as being a general 'softening' of the ageing trend in the area particularly with new younger residents and families living and working in the area. Subsequent to its report prepared last year for the Council on the long-term demographic and economic growth outlook for the Central Hawke's Bay District (CHBD), Economic Solutions Ltd (ESL) has been requested by the Council to provide further detailed information on the anticipated location and associated level of new housing development in CHBD over the long-term planning period. This information is intended to assist the Council in its planning for future services and infrastructurel provision in the district. For the purposes of this report, the long-term period comprises two parts, the next LTP (Long-Term Plan) interval 2015-2025 and the 20-year interval following this, that is, 2026-2046. Within this, ESL has also be asked to comment on future residential development in CHBD, both without and with the proposed RWSS (Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme) project. The 'without RWSS' scenario represents the 'Status Quo' position which essentially reflects a continuation of long-term historical demographic trends in the district. The specific matters addressed in the following sections of the report are as follows: . Historical residential growth within the district. Future residential growth under the Status Quo scenario. Future residential growth under the RWSS scenario. The information sources used for the analysis contained in the report are indicated in the different sections following It is noted that relevant information from the report prepared for the Council last year concerning the long-term growth outlook for CHBD, is also included in this later report. This section indicates the location and amount of new residential development in CHBD since the 2001 Census year. The indicators of 'households' and 'consented new residential dwellings' are both used in the analysis, with data results for the indicators being sourced from Statistics New Zealand (SNZ) information. 2.2 Appendices I(A) and I(B) are sourced directly from last year's report and indicate both historical and projected population and household growth in CHBD under the Status Quo growth scenario, based on the 2006 Census results. 2.3 Table I over-page and below the map summarises the change in the number of households in the different Census Area Units (CAUs) in the district, between 2001 and 2013. On the basis of SNZ figures, one 'household' basically equates to one 'occupied private dwelling' on Census night. CAUs refer to the broad collection areas that are used for the administration of Census survey forms at each UrbanGrowthStrategyMay2015. docx Economic Solutions Ltd Census. Figure I above the table provides a map of the different CAUs within CHBD. The table provides a broad locational profile of the additional residential development occurring in the district since 2001. 2.4 It should be noted that SNZ uses the Census 'household' indicator for its projections on future residential growth for the various districts and regions in New Zealand. FIGURE I: MAP OF CENTRAL HAWKE'S BAY DISTRICT CENSUS AREA UNITS AND LOCALITIES 2013 Rangitikei Hastings District District .wakar onkokino .Bbckburn OArgy E SI Tlkoklno . re . .Elsthorpe ^shley, :linton wa Mariawatu Wal kuruu airakau Walpawa District angakuri Beach d. Iaturria Tak u Takapau comakere ourerere Elsttiorpe-Fleming ton . lackhead .walling ford orangahau Tararua e Paerahi Warigaorapa District angaehu UrbanGrowthStrategyMay2015. docx Economic Solutions Ltd TABLE I : CENTRAL HAWKE'S BAY DISTRICT HOUSEHOLD GROWTH 2001-2013 CENSUS PERIOD BY CENSUS AREA UNIT. Households Change CAU 2001 20.3 Otane 182 235 53 29.1 Waipawa 756 841 85 11.2 Waipukurau 1543 1653 110 7.1 Elsthorpe-Flemington 1090 1239 149 13.7 Porengahau 99 88 -11 -I 1.1 Tikokino 923 1067 144 15.6 Takapau 204 210 6 29 TOTAL 4797 5333 536 11.2 25 The results in the table indicate that the leading CAU growth areas over the period were, in numerical terms, Elsthorpe-Flemington, Tikokino, Waipukurau, Waipawa and Otane.
Recommended publications
  • Cultural Values and Uses of the Tukituki Catchment
    Te Manaaki Taiao; Te Taiwhenua o Heretaunga Cultural Values and Uses of the Tukituki Catchment Final Report May 2012 Prepared for the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council 5/16/2012 Cultural Values and Uses of the Tukituki River Catchment by Heretaunga Marae/Hapu; Cultural Impact Assessment of the Ruataniwha Water Storage and Makaroro Dam Site Projects on Heretaunga Marae/Hapu Cultural Values and Uses. INDEX MIHI 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................... Page 3 2 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... Page 5 2.1 LOWER TUKITUKI RIVER: HERETAUNGA MARAE/ HAPŪ What, Why, Who, When 3 METHODOLOGY .................................................................... Page 6 3.1 CONSULTATION GUIDELINES Consultation Parameters Participants Report Constraints Report Scope Report Timeframe Results Format Context 4 RESULTS .................................................................................... Page 9 4.1 HERETAUNGA ARARAU ......................................................... Page 9 4.1.1 WHAKAPAPA 4.1.2 MARAE/ HAPŪ FEEDBACK – WHAKAPAPA 4.2 HERETAUNGA HAUKUNUI ..................................................... Page16 4.2.1 WAI-AWA 4.2.2 MARAE/ HAPŪ FEEDBACK - WAI-AWA 4.2.3 MAURI ............................................................................ Page 21 4.2.4 MARAE/ HAPŪ FEEDBACK – MAURI 4.2.5 WĀHI TAPU ............................................................................ Page 25 4.2.6 MARAE/ HAPŪ FEEDBACK - WĀHI TAPU 4.3 TE HAARO O TE KAAHU ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Central Hawke's Bay District Council
    Candidate Info Pack Central Hawke’s Bay District Council Chief Executive Officer February 2017 Contents Page Number Background 3 The District & Getting There 4 Community Profile 5 Mayor & Councillors 6 The Council 7 2 Central Hawke’s Bay District Council Background The Central Hawke’s Bay District is located on the East Coast of the North Island and makes up part of the wider Hawke’s Bay region. The District has two main towns - Waipukurau and Waipawa - with a number of smaller townships including Otane, Takapau, Tikokino, Porangahau and Ongaonga; as well as several beach townships including Kairakau, Pourerere, Aramoana, Blackhead and Te Paerahi. The main Council offices are located in Waipawa. State Highway 2 runs through the centre of Central Hawke’s Bay leading south to the Wairarapa and Palmerston North, and north to Hastings and Napier. Because of its location, the district is the gateway to the widely renowned Hawke’s Bay region, and is a key logistical route for freight and tourism. The Central Hawke’s Bay economy is largely supported by strong agricultural and horticulture related industries. The District is a big exporter of dairy, fruit, vegetable and meat products, with these industries being the major employers in the area. With a backdrop of the bush-clad Ruahine Ranges on one side and the Te Angiangi Marine Reserve on the other, Central Hawke's Bay is well served with walks and tramping opportunities. The various walks range from shorter walks that are fit for families and those wanting a gentle stroll, to the more demanding tracks fit for overnight trampers.
    [Show full text]
  • Thrive Consultation Outcomes
    + urbanism “A proud and prosperous district with strong communities, and connected citizens, who respect and celebrate nature” CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY BLUEPRINT APPENDICES FOR CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL BY: URBANISMPLUS LTD. JULY 2017 delivering sustainable communities + APPENDICIES urbanism Appendix A: Full Consultation Feedback Tables Appendix B: Workshop sheets produced during community consultation Appendix C: Typed-up feedback received during community consultation Appendix D: Further submissions received after consultation sessions CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY BLUEPRINT CONSULTATION OUTCOMES REPORT - CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL PAGE 1 + APPENDIX A. FULL CONSULTATION FEEDBACK TABLES urbanism The following tables outline the feedback from the consultation based on the three main questions asked: What is valued - ideas that conserve. What is holding us back - ideas to fix. Vision for the future - ideas that enrich. These have been grouped into the seven themes and related sub-themes. Where an idea re-occurs multiple times a number next to the idea indicates the number of times the idea has been suggested. A number of possible initiatives have also been included to demonstrate how the feedback could be taken forward. It is noted that these initiatives are only possible ideas for consideration and will not all be desirable or feasible to take forward. Further initiatives will need to be included to take into account functional and statutory requirements of the Council. Initiatives will be considered by the Council at a later stage of the process and consulted formally on with the community as part of the Long Term Plan process. Note: the tables are in rough form as they are intended for analysis purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Maori Customary Interests
    '*62... THE AHURIRI BLOCK~,",\O . , " , '.' ,": . \: " " ..-.~ '" .. ~r' " i: . I .. , . : ·r· ," i ! ~'. ~'I • ," ... ", ", " ,: ~,: ;" .. ~~ 'J .:. The tekoteko Tarewai at the entrance to Manahau meeting house, Wharerangi - 1981 MAORI CUSTOMARY INTERESTS Patrick Parsons May 1997, I~ ~I I ! . ~u . , ( .~ . ~. \ . I· ( ( \ ! .1 73 Poraiti Road, R.D.2,- Napier. 3 March, 1998. Waitangi Tribunal, Wellington. Kia Ora Dean, Firstly many thanks for the WAI 400 reports you sent me last month. They have now been added to my growing reference library and while I seldom read them from cover to cover there are often sections containing information I ha,ve never seen before and which shed light on events that have caused me to wonder in the past. Enclosed is the definitive copy of my WAI 400 Maori customary interests in the Ahuriri Block report. Apart from eliminating spelling mistakes I have amended references 2 and 3 which couldn't be cross­ checked until Napier Minute Bk 14 returned from National Archives where it had lain since 1995 or 1996. ( I am currently examining coastal boundaries in this area which have reference to jurisdiction over fishing rights. I have been going through old missionary records which contain some fascinating material and I'm often in danger of being sidetracked as you can imagine. I hope this report reaches you in one piece. I have left it unbound so it can be reproduced. Regards, /y/~. MAORI CUSTOMARY RIGHTS IN THE AHURIRI BLOCK. by PATRICK PARSONS. -.' '~~ ".j'(. .. (I . "\: .. • I. -~••. CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 1 Boundaries of the Purchase 1 Direction commissioning research 2 Statement on Maori customary rights 2 Existing research relating to the block 4 Tangatawhenua of the Ahuriri district 6 Ngati VVhatuEnamoa 6 NgatiAwa 8 Maruiwi 9 Te Koaupari 11 The Ngati Kahungunu invasion 14 The siege of Otatara 19 Placement of Taraia's followers 21 Impact of the invasion on the tangatawhenua 21 Rangituehu's legacy 25 , ..
    [Show full text]
  • Tukituki River
    Tukituki River Key Values Cultural Recreation (angling, boating) Ecology (wildlife, fisheries) Natural Character Table 1: List of documents reviewed Year Name Author 1966 An Encyclopaedia of New Zealand T.L Grant-Taylor 1979 64 New Zealand Rivers Egarr, Egarr & Mackay 1981 New Zealand Recreational River Survey G & J Egarr 1982 Submission on the Draft Inventory of Wild and Scenic Rivers of National Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Importance 1984 The Relative Value of Hawke's Bay Rivers to New Zealand Anglers Fisheries Research Division - N.Z. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries 1986 A List of Rivers and Lakes Deserving Inclusion in A Schedule of Protected Grindell & Guest Waters 1988 Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat of Hawke’s Bay Rivers G.R. Parrish 1994 Conservation Management Strategy (volume II) for Hawke’s Bay Conservancy Department of Conservation 1994 – 2004. 2003 Hastings District Plan Hastings District Council 2004 Potential Water Bodies of National Importance Ministry for the Environment 2004 Potential Water Bodies of National Importance for Recreation Value Ministry for the Environment 2006 Areas of Significant Conservation Values: HB Coastal Marine Area (HBRC Hawke’s Bay Regional Council Report Number 4203 - Draft) 2008 Wetland Review Monitoring Hawke’s Bay Regional Council 2009 Angler Usage of Lake and River Fisheries Managed by Fish & Game New Martin Unwin Zealand: Results from the 2007/08 National Angling Survey- NIWA 2010 Recreational Use of Hawke’s Bay Rivers – Results of the Recreational Usage Hawke’s Bay Regional
    [Show full text]
  • Part C Significant Amenity Features (Saf)
    PART C SIGNIFICANT AMENITY FEATURES (SAF) 91 SIGNIFICANT AMENITY FEATURES (SAF) Mākāroro River Eleven significant amenity features have been identified throughout Central Hawke’s Bay District. Of these eleven, eight relate to river or stream corridors which flow Mangataura Stream away from the Ruahine Range in the western extent of the District. Indigenous vegetation is one of the key characteristics contributing to the recognition of these Waipawa River corridors as a significant amenity feature, although often with a higher degree of modification (e.g. grazing/ browsing) than the nearby ONF’s identified above. Upper Tukituki River Maintaining this existing vegetation and preventing further removal of indigenous species is an important method in maintaining this characteristic. While limiting Tukipo River the planting of new exotic species within these areas is not achievable in a planning sense, it should not be encouraged. Tangarewai Stream The two central area features (Silver Range and Lake Whatuma) are recognised for their landform values, with Mangatewai River Lake Whatuma also having high associational values. Maintaining clear visibility of the Silver Range feature is important for recognition of its key characteristics, with Makāretu River earthworks and pine plantations seen as the possible threats to this, and both factors should not be encouraged in a landscape sense. Any activities which could adversely Te Aute Limestone Crest affect cultural values should also be limited. The one coastal area has been mainly recognised for Lake Whatuma geomorphology and cultural associational values, but there is also a degree of ecology values present, despite the extent of modification. Earthworks could adversely Pōrangahau Inland Dunes affect the key characteristic of the dune landform and impact on cultural sites, so both are to be limited in a planning sense.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE [No. 67
    2610 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE [No. 67 Hawke's Bay Electoral Districir­ Waipukurau, Racecourse Road, Mr. A. McP. Young's Garage. Ardkeen, Public Hall. Wairoa, Borough Offices. Argyll East, Public School. Wairoa, (North Clyde), Public School. Ashley-Clinton, Public School. Wairoa, Public School. Bartlett's, Public School. Waiwhare, Ward Bros.' Residence. ' Bay View, the King George's Hall. Wakarara, School Building. Blackburn, Hinerua, Post-dffice Building. Wallingford, Public School. Clydebank. School Building. Wanstead, School Building. Crcwnthorpe, Public Schoo!. Whakaki, Maori Sohool. Elsthorpe, Public School. Whanawhana, Mr. Harold Beamish's House. ,Eskdale, Public School. Wharekopae, Public School. Flemington (Hatuma), Public School. Wharerangi, (near Greenmeadows) Mr. Harris' Gara.ge. Frasertown, Public School. Willow Flat (near Kotemaori), Publio School. Gwavas (Tikokino), State Forest Office. Hangarca, Public School. Hatuma, Public School. Hobson Electoral Districir­ Kairakau (Waipawa), Mrs. E. Furminger's Beach Cottage. Ahipara, Maori School. Kaitawa Hydro, Y.M.C.A. Aoraa, Settlers' Hall. Kaiwaka Settlement, Tareha Hall. Aranga, Public Hall. Kaiwaka South, School Building. Ararua, Public Hall. Kereru, Public Hall. Aratapu, Public School. Kotemaori, Public School. Awakino Point, Public Hall. Mahia Peninsula, Maori School. Awanui, Public School. Makaretu, Public School. Awaroa, School Ga,rage. l\lakarora, Public School. Awarua, Maori School. Mangaruhe Crossing, Public School. Broadwood, A. and P. Hall. Manutuke, Public School. Cbase's Gorge, Presbyterian Church Hall. Maraekakaho, Public School. Darga,ville, Courthouse. Maraetotara, School Building. Donnelly'S Crossing, Settlers' Hall. Marakeke, Public School. Fairburns. Public Hall. Marumaru, Public School. Herekino, Public School. Mohaka, Maori School. Hoanga, Public Hall. Morere, School Building. Horeke, Horeke Hall. Muriwai (Maraetaba), Public School. Houhora, Evau's Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Applicants
    Information For Applicants A guide to give you some background information about Central Hawke’s Bay and the Central Hawke’s Bay District Council Central Hawke’s Bay District Council PO Box 127, Waipawa 4240 Phone (06) 857 8060 Fax (06) 857 7179 email: [email protected] www.chbdc.govt.nz Central Hawke’s Bay Central Hawke’s Bay (CHB) is situated in the North Island of New Zealand between Hastings and Dannevirke. The District forms the lower part of the Hawke’s Bay Region, as shown in the Map below: Central Hawke’s Bay has a population of approximately 13,000 and a land area of 3,324 square kilometres covering: Aramoana Porangahau Ashley Clinton Pourerere Blackhead Takapau Elsthorpe Te Paerahi Flemington Tikokino Kairakau Waipawa Omakere Waipukurau Onga Onga Wakarara Otane Wallingford Patangata Wanstead Central Hawke’s Bay is an aesthetically pleasing district with many parks, reserves, beaches and heritage trails. It has an excellent all year round climate with an average of 1973 sunshine hours annually, and temperatures ranging from 7.5 to 34.5 degrees Celsius. On average, 829 millimetres of rain falls annually. The district has a diverse physical environment which includes the forest covered Ruahine Ranges, the rolling flat plains where agriculture and horticulture predominates, the urban areas accessed by the East Coast Rail Line and State Highway Two, and the coastal beaches on the east coast. Less than 1 % of the land area in the district is classed as urban. The district has a strong history of farming which continues through to present day including dairy, beef, sheep and mixed farming.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism Destination Plan & Needs Assessment
    Tourism Destination Plan & Needs Assessment Together we thrive! E ora ngātahi ana! Contents Introduction 2 The Central Hawke’s Bay Visitor Economy – A Current Snapshot 3 Responding to tourism and COVID-19 4 Creating a distinctive and attractive Central Hawke’s Bay destination 5 - Vision 5 - Goals 5 - Principles 5 - Challenges 6 Destination strengths of the Central Hawke’s Bay 7 - The Central Hawke’s Bay Visitor Proposition 7 - Regional Alignment 7 Key Visitor Attractors and Hero Experiences 8 - Hero Experiences 9 The Location of Key Experiences 14 - Getting To, and Around the District. 15 Target Markets 16 - Planned Day Visitors – ‘Day-Trippers’ 16 - Planned Overnight Visitors – ‘Weekend Getaways’ 16 - Unplanned Day Visitors – ‘Spontaneous Explorers’ 17 - Planned Regular Overnight Visitors – ‘Holiday Homers’ 17 - Planned Multi-Night Visit in Motorhome – ‘Motorhomers’ 17 - Planned Visitors visiting Friends and Relatives or in town for Business 18 Visitor Sector Seasonality 19 Strategic Priorities 20 Delivering the Plan 21 - Priority Actions / Key Moves 21 - Action Plan 22 Appendices: Destination/Journey mapping 32 Tourism Destination Plan and Needs Assessment • 1 Introduction Central Hawke’s Bay is New Zealand’s undeveloped Destination Management Planning mountains to sea visitor destination. The unique Destination Management Planning considers the stories of Central Hawke’s Bay – both Māori and management of all aspects of a destination that post European and landscapes provide rich layers contributes to a visitor’s experience. It involves of experience. At present visitors are predominantly understanding the district’s unique visitor proposition ‘local’, from the wider Hawke’s Bay region or just and the opportunities to capitalise on it, as well as the beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Thrive Consultation Outcomes
    + urbanism Porangaha CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY BLUEPRINT CONSULTATION OUTCOMES REPORT - CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL PAGE 33 + urbanism Takapau CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY BLUEPRINT CONSULTATION OUTCOMES REPORT - CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL PAGE 34 + urbanism Takapau CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY BLUEPRINT CONSULTATION OUTCOMES REPORT - CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL PAGE 35 + urbanism Waipukurau CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY BLUEPRINT CONSULTATION OUTCOMES REPORT - CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL PAGE 36 + urbanism Waipukurau CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY BLUEPRINT CONSULTATION OUTCOMES REPORT - CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL PAGE 37 + urbanism Waipukurau CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY BLUEPRINT CONSULTATION OUTCOMES REPORT - CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL PAGE 38 + urbanism Waipawa CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY BLUEPRINT CONSULTATION OUTCOMES REPORT - CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL PAGE 39 + urbanism Waipawa CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY BLUEPRINT CONSULTATION OUTCOMES REPORT - CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL PAGE 40 + urbanism Waipawa CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY BLUEPRINT CONSULTATION OUTCOMES REPORT - CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL PAGE 41 + urbanism Waipawa CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY BLUEPRINT CONSULTATION OUTCOMES REPORT - CENTRAL HAWKE’S BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL PAGE 42 + APPENDIX C: TYPED-UP FEEDBACK RECEIVED DURING COMMUNITY CONSULTATION urbanism Ongaonga community, 12 April, 2-3.30pm Now, holding the District (and Ongaonga) back: Living beyond our means, local government Smallness disadvantage for youth (18) employment salaries Group Ong-1: opportunities Lack of
    [Show full text]
  • History Time Line of Napier and Hawke's
    HISTORY TIME LINE OF NAPIER AND HAWKE’S BAY A partial timeline of Napier and Hawke’s Bay 1769-1974. Port Ahuriri 1866 by Charles Decimus Barraud, 1822-1897: A view from Bluff Hill, Napier, looking north down to Westshore and Port Ahuriri. There are houses on a spit of land surrounded by water and further low- lying islands without houses. A steam ship and a number of sailing ships can be seen in the harbor. Ref: D-040-002. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/32199839 Introduction: Ngāti Kahungunu trace their origins to the Tākitimu waka, which arrived in Aotearoa from Rarotonga around 1100-1200 AD. Tamatea Ariki Nui, the captain of Tākitimu, settled in Tauranga, and is buried on top of Mauao, called Mount Maunganui today. Tamatea Ariki Nui had a son called Rongokako, and he had a son called Tamatea Pokai Whenua Pokai Moana, which means “Tamatea explorer of land and sea.” It is from Tamatea Pokai Whenua Pokai Moana that we have the longest place name, located at Porongahau – “Taumatawhakatangihangakōauauatamateaturipukakapikimaungahoronuku pokaiwhenuakitānatahu” where Tamatea Pokai Whenua Pokai Moana played a flute to his lover. It is the son of Tamatea Pokai Whenua Pokai Moana named Kahungunu that Ngāti Kahungunu comes from. Kahungunu travelled widely and eventually settled on the East Coast. His grandson Rakaihikuroa, migrated with his son Taraia, their families and followers, from Nukutaurua on the Māhia Peninsula to Heretaunga (Hawke’s Bay area). Eventually, Heretaunga was brought under the control of his people, who became the first Ngāti Kahungunu as we know it today in Hawke’s Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Received an Invitation from Te Kaihou, the Widow of Te Ringanohu to Help Her People Against Ngāi Te Upokoiri
    Wai 2180, #O2(a) Customary interests in the Kāweka and Gwavas CFL lands Te Maire Tau & Martin Fisher 27 November 2019 Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................................ 2 List of Maps ........................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 4 Section 1: Definition of customary rights .............................................................................. 8 Section 2: Historical background and whakapapa ............................................................... 14 Ngāti Whatumamoa/Hotu conquests ................................................................................ 15 Whakapapa and traditions of Ngāti Hinemanu me Ngāti Paki ......................................... 21 The Ngāti Paki descent lines of Winiata Te Whaaro ........................................................ 28 Ngāti Hinemanu relations on both sides of the Ruahine range ........................................ 36 The battles of the 1810s-1830s ......................................................................................... 43 The Alliance between Te Pareihe and Te Wera Hauraki ................................................. 50 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]