LESSONS LEARNED from the BEDZED DEVELOPMENT Janet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LESSONS LEARNED from the BEDZED DEVELOPMENT Janet TOWARDS ZERO ENERGY BUILDINGS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE BEDZED DEVELOPMENT Janet Young The Bartlett School of Graduate Studies University College London A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University College London September 2015 1 Declaration I, Janet YOUNG, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract In order for the UK to meet carbon reduction targets and increased demand for housing from a growing population, houses need to be built that use less energy. Designers have responded by designing low energy buildings but little research has been undertaken on the actual performance of such buildings in use. This study compares the performance in use of 24 dwellings at the Beddington Zero Energy Development (BedZED) designed as a zero energy development. A unique feature is that, for the first time in energy monitoring studies, measurement of dwelling performance in use was undertaken both in the newly built dwellings and dwellings occupied previously by the study's participants. The results show that the dwellings achieved their design temperature during the heating season and that occupants were generally satisfied with winter comfort levels. Energy usage was lower in the new properties than previous dwellings and lower than comparable new dwellings at the time, broadly achieving the Passivhaus standard. The dwellings achieved a good standard of airtightness although there were some reports of condensation. Internal temperatures in the summer months showed a potential to overheat during hot spells and occupants were less satisfied with summer comfort. It is considered that this was partly because occupants were not familiar with how to cool their homes. The study reviewed Energy Performance Certificates issued for BedZED properties sold/rented and found them to be inconsistent and inaccurate. This has implications for the marketability of future low energy homes if not addressed by industry. It also found inconsistency in the application of measurement systems in the various models used. 3 Acknowledgements There are many people and organisations that have helped me complete the research and writing of this thesis. I am particularly grateful to my supervisor at UCL, Tadj Oreszczyn, who has supported and guided me through this long endeavour. Also to Alex Summerfield who assisted with the classification and organisation of my data and Payel Das who advised on statistical analysis techniques. I am grateful to Sung Hong and Dejan Mumovic for completing an on-site survey on one of the case study properties. There are also many people who had the vision for the original BedZED development and helped build it. In particular, these include Dickon Robinson, Development Director at Peabody Trust, Pooran Desai and Nicole Lazarus of Bioregional, architect Bill Dunster and energy engineer Chris Twinn. Nic Wedlake and Tessa Barraclough of Peabody provided information about BedZED’s energy use and gave their time to explain it. I am grateful to Ian Orme and Sarah Gubbins of Rickaby Thompson Associates who installed data loggers, downloaded monitoring data for two phases of the study and conducted the occupancy surveys. The residents of BedZED, who agreed to participate in this study, gave access to their homes for a long period and also provided useful insights which assisted with the interpretation of data. Elaine Cloutman-Green provided the necessary drive and motivation to encourage me to finish writing when I was close to giving up. Most of all, I am grateful to David Harbud who has stoically supported me through the many years it has taken to complete this thesis and without whom I would never have finished. 4 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................. 18 1.1 Research Context ............................................................................. 18 1.2 Research Aim, Hypothesis and Research Questions ........................ 19 1.3 Research Significance ...................................................................... 20 1.4 Thesis Structure ................................................................................ 21 Chapter 2 Literature Review ........................................................................ 25 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 25 2.2 Scientific context ............................................................................... 26 2.3 Policy context .................................................................................... 27 2.4 Demand for Energy ........................................................................... 28 2.5 Building Regulations ......................................................................... 35 2.6 Modelling and Measurement systems ............................................... 36 2.7 Human Factors.................................................................................. 43 2.8 Passive Design, Low Energy and Zero Energy houses .................... 54 2.9 Passivhaus ........................................................................................ 57 2.10 Performance Gap .............................................................................. 61 2.11 BedZED in the literature .................................................................... 62 2.12 Conclusions ...................................................................................... 62 Chapter 3 Comparative Low Energy Case Studies ...................................... 64 3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 64 3.2 Pennyland ......................................................................................... 65 3.3 Linford ............................................................................................... 67 3.4 Milton Keynes Energy Park ............................................................... 68 3.5 Brixton Super-Insulated Houses ........................................................ 70 3.6 Retrofit Studies : York Energy Demonstration Project and the Warm Front Programme .............................................................................. 71 3.7 Carbon Reduction in Buildings (CaRB) ............................................. 72 3.8 Comparative Case Studies Conclusions ........................................... 73 Chapter 4 BedZED Case Study ................................................................... 74 4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 74 4.2 BedZED Development Team ............................................................ 74 4.3 BedZED Timelines ............................................................................ 75 4.4 BedZED Location .............................................................................. 75 5 4.5 BedZED Scheme .............................................................................. 77 4.6 BedZED Design Aims ....................................................................... 77 4.7 Land Use ........................................................................................... 77 4.8 Passive Design Principles ................................................................. 78 4.9 Building Physics ................................................................................ 85 4.10 Zero Energy ...................................................................................... 86 4.11 BedZED Energy Strategy .................................................................. 87 4.12 BedZED SAP Calculation .................................................................. 89 4.13 Designed Energy Usage ................................................................... 90 4.14 Whole Life Energy Use ..................................................................... 93 4.15 Mechanical and Electrical Systems ................................................... 94 4.16 CHP Design ...................................................................................... 97 4.17 Sizing the CHP plant ......................................................................... 99 4.18 Daylighting Design .......................................................................... 102 4.19 Ventilation Design ........................................................................... 103 4.20 Heating Design................................................................................ 105 4.21 Other BedZED studies .................................................................... 108 4.22 Before BedZED ............................................................................... 110 4.23 Case Study Conclusions ................................................................. 112 Chapter 5 Summer Overheating ................................................................ 114 5.1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 114 5.2 Weather Trends .............................................................................. 114 5.3 Definition of Hot Spells .................................................................... 115 5.4 Summer Comfort ............................................................................. 115 5.5 Impact of Hot Spells on Health .......................................................
Recommended publications
  • A-Z Directory of Voluntary Sector Services in the London Borough of Sutton for Adults Sutton Centre for the Voluntary Sector
    A-Z Directory of voluntary sector services In the London Borough of Sutton for Adults Sutton Centre for the Voluntary Sector Sutton Centre for the Voluntary Sector is part of a national network of CVS’s across the country, supported by the National Association for Voluntary and Community Action (NAVCA). SCVS was established in 1965 as the voluntary sector support organisation for the newly formed London Borough of Sutton (LBS). SCVS has a long and successful track record of representing, promoting, developing and supporting local voluntary and community action to improve the lives of people in Sutton. We currently have around 300 voluntary and community groups in membership, which vary considerably in size and scope from smaller volunteer led and run community groups to larger organisations employing staff and providing services to significant numbers of local people. Develop Supporting voluntary and community organisations to function effectively, deliver quality services and become sustainably resourced. Connect Facilitating effective communication, networking and collaboration Influence Ensuring voluntary and community organisations are well represented and that the voluntary and community sector influences developments. Find out more about our work by visiting www.suttoncvs.org.uk Address: Sutton CVS, Granfers Community Centre, 73-79 Oakhill Rd, Sutton SM1 3AA Telephone: 020 8644 2867 Email: [email protected] 2 Adults Services in Sutton Introduction elcome to the Adults’ Health, Wellbeing and Social Care Directory of Services within Sutton’s Voluntary and Community Sector. WServices are listed alphabetically with a categorised index on pages 56 to 59 to help you find what you are looking for. Please be aware that some services have referral criteria so it is always wise to check the website or make contact via the phone number or email address provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Districts ADEME1 Bedzed
    1. BedZed (Sutton - UK) Project description BedZED (Beddington Zero Energy Aerial view of BedZED, credit Bill Dunster Architect Development) is the UK's first and largest carbon-neutral eco-community and is located in Sutton, a residential town 40 minutes South East from London. BedZED consists of 82 residential homes with a mixture of tenures – 34 for outright sale, 23 for shared ownership, 10 for key workers and 15 at affordable rent for social housing – and 1'600 square metres of work space, an onsite shop, café, sport facilities, health centre and childcare facilities with a further 14 galleried apartments for outright sale. Residents have been living at BedZED since March 2002 and currently BedZed is home to 220 residents. The BedZED design concept was driven by the desire to create a net 'zero fossil energy development', one that will produce at least as much energy from renewable sources as it consumes. Only energy from renewable sources is used to meet the energy needs of BedZED the development is therefore a carbon neutral development - resulting in no net addition of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Objectives The project aims and objectives are: • No use of fossil fuels • 50% reduction of the energies used for transport • 60% reduction of the domestic energy compared to the average British households • 90% reduction of the heating needs • Usage of renewable energies • 30% reduction of water consumption • Reduce waste and encourage recycling • Use construction materials from local providers (located whithin less than a 60 km radius) • Development of local resources (farmer network for local food) • Develop biodiversity in the natural areas Driving factors The main driving factor of the BedZed project was environmental .
    [Show full text]
  • GIR 89 Version 2
    GENERAL INFORMATION REPORT 89 BedZED – Beddington Zero Energy Development, Sutton GENERAL INFORMATION REPORT REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION 89 BEST PRACTICE PROGRAMME BEDDINGTON ZERO ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 3 2 WHY SUSTAINABILITY? 4 3 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY 6 4 BedZED – CONCEPT, DENSITY, FORM 8 5 TACKLING ENERGY ISSUES 11 6 GREEN TRAVEL PLAN 15 7 GREEN SPACE 18 8 WATER STRATEGY 20 9 MATERIALS, LABOUR AND WASTE 22 10 SUSTAINABLE LOCAL ECONOMY 24 11 CREATING A SUSTAINABLE LOCAL COMMUNITY 26 12 CONCLUSION – WAYS FORWARD 27 APPENDIX 1 – KEY INFORMATION/SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS 30 APPENDIX 2 – PARTNERS 33 APPENDIX 3 - SHORT ROTATION COPPICE REQUIREMENTS 35 REFERENCES 36 The Report is published under the Government’s Energy Efficiency Best Practice programme, the building-related aspects of which are managed by BRECSU. The views expressed in this Report are those of the authors and BioRegional. They do not necessarily represent the views of other project partners or the Government. Main cover photograph courtesy Linda Hancock BEDDINGTON ZERO ENERGY DEVELOPMENT 1 INTRODUCTION Located in the London Borough of Sutton, the Beddington Zero-Energy Development (BedZED) This Report was written is a joint initiative of the Peabody Trust and while construction was BioRegional Development Group. Their objective in progress, and is intended was to enable people to live sustainably without to provide information sacrificing a modern, urban and mobile lifestyle. to construction and For example, BedZED incorporates a Green Travel development professionals. Plan, which minimises the need to travel but Certain elements of the promotes alternative methods of transport where project may change before travelling is necessary. In the words of the completion.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Sutton the IMAGINE Arts Festival, in Partnership All Events Are FREE
    Sponsored by Organised and funded by London Borough of Sutton The IMAGINE arts festival, in partnership All events are FREE. One Planet Sutton IMAGINE is Sutton’s largest with One Planet Sutton, aims to publicise celebration of the arts and is Where *Booking required is stated please Sutton’s sustainability initiatives via Sutton has signed up to become a One Planet contact Sutton Theatres via the details below, creativity and participation from our thriving borough by 2025. This means ensuring we are now in its eighth year. or email if listed in the event. arts community, offering entertainment, all able to live happy, healthy lives in a way that stimulating and thought-provoking events helps to save money and reduces our impact on the BY PHONE: focussing on how we can better use, and world. One Planet Sutton looks at five themes which You can book or reserve tickets by calling our treat, our planet. cover everything from sustainable transport and All events will be eco themed as box office number: 020 8770 6990 energy efficiency, to healthy lifestyles and inclusive or enquiries line: 020 8770 6985 we partner with One Planet Sutton The IMAGINE arts festival is supported by communities. Look out for the five One Planet Sutton IN PERSON: Sutton Council, which funds a grant scheme to theme icons, which show you the key ways that each to celebrate the arts in one of at the Secombe Theatre (9am - 4pm weekdays and help local community artists deliver a wide range event will help us create a more sustainable borough.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study of Serenbe, Georgia
    WHAT IT TAKES TO BECOME A NET- ZERO DEVELOPMENT: CASE STUDY OF SERENBE, GEORGIA Abstract Authors Haleh Moghaddasi, Phillip James Tabb, With increased efforts toward planning for climate change mitiga- and Hazem Rashed-Ali Texas A&M University, The University tion, and design of carbon-neutral and Net-Zero (NZ) buildings, quite of Texas at San Antonio little has been improved regarding communities and nations. With Keywords integrated design and planning of primary sustainable measures, Net-zero energy community, sustainable precedent studies, solution sets, net-zero including energy generation, energy use in buildings, and energy use indicators, design strategies in transposition, Net-Zero Community (NZC) can be feasible. The purpose of this study is to generate a NZC Model residential devel- opment in the U.S. and to identify NZC sustainable planning and design measures. A case study at Serenbe, in north Georgia, is going to be evaluated to promote its sustainable measures toward NZC. To understand NZC planning measures, two notable sustainable developments were studied, BedZED in London and UC Davis West Village in California, to identify their sustainable measures necessary to create a NZC. The existing communities are assessed in the power, building, and transportation sectors (PBT). The outcome will be an effective Model achieving NZC, through promoting major sustain- able measures including agriculture, transportation network, density, housing typology, use of renewable energy, mixes of use, pedestrian and biking route, and land preservation. Prometheus 04 Buildings, Cities, and Performance, II Introduction Literature Review With increases in world population, consumption at an NET-ZERO COMMUNITY DEFINITION alarming rate, continued reliance on non-renewable There are multiple, diverse, and competing definitions of resources, energy-inefficient building systems, and inef- NZ building (NZB).
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Journal
    Vol.38 No.1. (112003). Ed,tor: David J Brown Art Editor and Designer: Desmond Wyeth FCSD. Deputy Edrtor: Karen Svensson Ed1tonal: Tel: +44 (0)20 7755 3828 Fax: +44 (0)20 7755 3716 e-mail: [email protected] Published by Arup. 13 Fitzroy S1reet. London W1T 480. UK. Tel: +44 (0)20 7636 1531 Fax: +44 (0)20 7580 3924 e-mail: [email protected] www.arup.com Arup is a global organization of designers. It has a constantly evolving skills base, and works for local and international clients throughout the world . We shape a better world. Front cover: The City of Manchester Stadium (pp25-36) Photo: ©Arup Associates/Dennis GilberWIEW Editorial 3 Most of the projects and processes described 37 Poverty in this issue of The Arup Journal were designed Denver alleviation: to enhance and improve various aspects of Millennium the role of the human environment. In his 2002/03 Brunel Bridge the engineer International Lecture 'Poverty alleviation: the John Eddy David Singleton role of the engineer' (pp3-9), David Singleton Steve Kite j analyzes the ways in which human poverty is 8 often rooted in infrastructure issues, and how engineers can work with local communities, regional authorities, and national governments J to alleviate and solve them. 0 In Zimbabwe, the local Arup practice pulled 10 together much of the country's troubled road 40 construction industry in a consortium to design Engineering BedZED and deliver, quickly and with minimum adverse Chris Twinn 'Marsyas' at environmental impact. a vital new road Tate Modern (pp49-52) for the wealth-creating Zimbabwe Cecil Salmond Platinum Mines.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Second Meeting in the Third Series of TEN at Bedzed, in Hackbridge, Sutton on 19.1.06
    Summary of the second meeting in the third series of TEN at BedZed, in Hackbridge, Sutton on 19.1.06 Present Paul Clark, Chief Planning Officer, LB Redbridge Chris Donovan, Assistant Director (Strategy, Planning and Regeneration) Bexley Council Marc Dorfman, Head of Regeneration, Ealing Council Paul Evans, Strategic Director of Regeneration, Southwark Council Tom Jeffrey, Director of Environment and Leisure, LB Sutton Paul Martin, Chief Executive, LB Sutton Nicholas Falk, URBED Esther Caplin, URBED Apologies John Best, Chief Executive, Milton Keynes Council Peter Bishop, Director of Culture and Environment Camden Council David Hennings, Director of Strategic Planning, Haringey Council John Herman, Divisional Director, Regeneration and Development, LB Newham Phillip Goodwin, Director of Planning and Development, Croydon Council Shifa Mustafa, Assistant Director of Planning, Haringey Council The second meeting in the third TEN series took place at BedZed at Hackbridge in Sutton, the pioneering housing scheme, and discussion concentrated on how Sutton, a leader in promoting sustainability, could stay ahead of the game, particularly as far as dealing with traffic is concerned. Briefing was circulated in advance including a Profile of Sutton and a case study on BedZed from CABE’s Building For Life website. The Mayor’s first Review of the London Plan has recognised that London’s suburbs are facing a crisis and the relevant section was included in the briefing, with seven propositions that are drawn from URBED’s work for the GLA, Tomorrow’s Suburbs: Tools for Making London’s Suburbs More Sustainable. The introduction and toolkit for the section ‘Promoting alternatives to the car’ from this report were attached, along with an introduction to a forthcoming special edition of Built Ennvironment on sustainable suburbs that Nicholas Falk is editing.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 August 2016
    P a g e | 1 August 2016 www.thirdstrand.co.uk P a g e | 2 RESTORATION PROJECT PROPOSAL Third Strand Consulting Ltd 15th August 2016 CULVERS LODGE August 2016 www.thirdstrand.co.uk P a g e | 3 Executive summary Culvers Lodge is a locally listed single storey 85 m2 Victorian residential property with garden in the Hackbridge area of Sutton. The Lodge is a Victorian property dating from c1841, with an unusual shape and terracotta finials. Having been vacant for a number of years the property is in an advanced state of dilapidation. Due to its local historical value, being the last remaining property of the Culvers Estate, ‘there is significant local interest to see it retained. Friends of Culvers Lodge secured local listing status for the building and approached Wandle Valley Regional Park Trust (WVRPT) to secure funding and oversee a feasibility study of the site, to establish the viability and sustainability of retaining the site for community benefit. Heritage Lottery Funding was secured to explore the proposal further and a project steering group made up of four local residents, London Borough of Sutton officers and WVRPT was created to oversee the project. Local statistics reveal the area is predominately middle income young families. In the immediate area the Lodge neighbours a primary school and is in close proximity to the Wandle River and two community spaces that have rooms for hire. Local shops and train station are 0.3 mile away. Relevant local plans include ‘Sustainable Hackbridge’ with the area identified as Sutton’s flagship for One Planet Living, expansion of Hackbridge Primary School, Hackbridge becoming a district centre with increased housing and employment space, including the redevelopment of the Felnex industrial site.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedzed at a Glance Scoring 48 / 55
    Bill Dunster, Architects BEDZED At a glance scoriNG 48 / 55 PROJECT DETAILS AWARDS LOCATION: London Borough of Sutton, United Kingdom. UN-HABITAT AWARDS YEAR BUILT: planning approved 1999, construction 2000 and completed Finalist 2002 and occupied in 2002 SUSTAINABILITY AWARDS ARCHITECTS: Bill Dunster & Partners (now ZED Factory) winner of RIBA 2001 for DEVELOPERS: Peabody Trust (Client Co-Developer)/BioRegional Sustainability Development Group (Co-Developer, Sustainability solutions) ARCHITECTURAL AWARDS MANAGEMENT: Peabody Trust Stirling Prize, shortlisted BUDGET: undisclosed AREA: 16,544 sq m. DENSITY: 60 dwellings per hectare CONSTRUCTION: Ove Arup & Partners (Building physics, energy, water, ventilation, services); Ellis and Moore (Structural and Civil Engineers); Gardiner & Theobald (Quantity Surveyors, Project Managers & Main Contractor); BP Solar (Photovoltaic installation) Environmental Sustainability Social Sustainability Objectives Economic Sustainability Objectives Objectives minimise minimise protect ethical adequate housing interaction quality of competitive economic employment use of pollution biodiversity standards facilities needs met with locality architecture businesses diversity resources 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 Brief Description The Beddington Zero (fossil) Energy Development (BedZED) café/bar, sports pitch with clubhouse and village green. The was the largest and first eco-community in the UK. Today it community is home to approximately 220 residents and 100 is regarded as a flagship example for many environmental
    [Show full text]
  • BEDZED Sustainable Living
    Where is Bedzed? BEDZED Sustainable living Beddington Zero Energy Development What makes Bedzed a sustainable community? (BedZED) was built in • Transport - Cars are discouraged; the project encourages public transport, cycling, and 2002 in Hackbridge, walking, and has limited parking space. Car pooling/sharing occurs- City Car Club. London, England. Residents are encouraged to use this environmentally friendly alternative to car ownership; an on-site selection of vehicles is available for use. • Encourage eco-friendly transport—Electric and liquefied-petroleum-gas cars have priority What is Bedzed? over cars that burn petrol and diesel, and electricity is provided in parking spaces for charging It was the UK’s first large-scale mixed use electric cars. sustainable community, with 100 homes, office space for around 100 workers and community • Accessible transport - five minutes’ walk of Hackbridge station (LONDON) / facilities. It uses environmentally friendly Tramlink service from Croydon or Wimbledon to Mitcham Junction station, which is housing and is a low carbon neighbourhood. It within 15 minutes’ walk of BedZED. promotes a more sustainable lifestyle. • Zero energy—the project is designed to use only energy from renewable sources generated on site. There are 777 m² of solar panels. The energy provided for the community comes from woodchips from waste timber that would otherwise be sent to the landfill. • Energy efficient—the houses face south to take advantage of solar gain, are triple glazed, and have high thermal insulation. No need for central heating. • Water efficient—Most rain water falling on the site is collected and reused. Appliances are chosen to be water-efficient and use recycled water when possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Material Colour Palette
    • Materials: timber frame, wattle and daub, peg tile roofs and occasionally brick • Colour patterns: Timber often painted black and white (although there is no historical justification for this); red tile roofs, soft orange red bricks; and weather boarding often added SIX • Examples in Sutton: the Old Cottage (the Broadway, Cheam) and Whitehall (Cheam). 18th century buildings 6.4 Predominantly brick buildings. • Materials: Soft red sandy brick, coarse red or Local material colour palette yellowish bricks (which are easily confused with Introduction London stock bricks), peg / pan tiles, the soft red 6.1 The underlying principle of good urban design is how bricks are sometimes cut and rubbed to decorate new development will respond to and reflect an area’s windows or doors, wooden sash windows or lead local distinctiveness, and where none exists, creates a casement windows in less prominent locations. distinct character of its own. This may be achieved by • Colour patterns: Red or yellowish bricks, red roof considering how modern design and materials respond tiles. to the local vernacular, while incorporating the • Examples in Sutton: The Old Rectory (Festival principles of sustainable construction and materials. Walk, Carshalton), Cottages (Wrights Row, Wallington) and Sutton Lodge (Brighton Road, 6.2 This section sets out a local palette of materials and Sutton) colour schemes from the various building periods. This should be taken into account in any local context Weatherboarding appraisal. 6.5 Many timber framed weather board houses were built in the area between the 18th and early 19th century, Pre-18th century buildings with several built before this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Plan 2016 - 2026
    ! DRAFT Neighbourhood Plan 2016 - 2026 Public Consultation January 2016 Hackbridge & Beddington Corner Neighbourhood Development Group ! CONTENTS ! ! 01 INTRODUCTION Page 3 ! 02 A PLACE CALLED HACKBRIDGE Page 7 03 OUR NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN Page 13 04 VISION AND OBJECTIVES Page 27 05 POLICIES Page 30 06 HACKBRIDGE COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN Page 64 ! ! 2 01 INTRODUCTION ! Forward “Your, my, our Hackbridge. All having a hand in the process” This neighbourhood plan has been produced in consultation with residents, businesses and other interested parties. It builds on previous work undertaken by and with the community of Hackbridge and Beddington Corner, including the draft Hackbridge Master Plan 2009. The intention is that this plan will provide clear guidance and direction to investors and developers, as to the way local people wish to see Hackbridge move forward and thrive in the future. It will form part of a long-term delivery plan, for implementation by a variety of partners. It covers the period 2016-2026. It should be seen as a living document, which needs to be regularly reviewed to ensure the needs and aspirations of the community continue to be addressed. This plan is a consultation draft. Residents, businesses and other key stakeholders now have a further opportunity to review and comment on the proposals before it is formally submitted to Sutton Council for consultation ahead of an independent examination. Providing the plan is found acceptable, there will be a referendum at which the community of Hackbridge and Beddington Corner will vote on whether to accept it. If a majority support the Plan then it will become part of the formal development plan for the area and be used by Sutton Council to determine planning applications.
    [Show full text]