DOCSLIB.ORG

Havasu NWR Draft Hunting CD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Havasu NWR Draft Hunting CD COMPATIBILITY DETERMINATION USE: Hunting (Migratory Birds, Upland and Big Game) REFUGE NAME: Havasu National Wildlife Refuge (NWR/refuge) ESTABLISHING AND ACQUISITION AUTHORITIES: Havasu NWR, originally known as Havasu Lake NWR, was established by Executive Order 8647 on January 22, 1941, by President Franklin Roosevelt. REFUGE PURPOSE(S): For lands acquired under Executive Order 8647 "...as a refuge and breeding grounds for migratory birds and other wildlife...” For lands acquired under the Refuge Recreation Act “...suitable for (1) incidental fish and wildlife-oriented recreational development, (2) the protection of natural resources, (3) the conservation of endangered species or threatened species..." For lands acquired under the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act "...for the development, advancement, management, conservation, and protection of fish and wildlife resources...for the benefit of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service [Service], in performing its activities and services. Such acceptance may be subject to the terms of any restrictive or affirmative covenant, or condition of servitude...” Additional lands totaling 2,757 acres were subsequently added on February 11, 1949, per Public Land Order 559. The purpose of these additional acres was the same as the purpose set out in Executive Order 8647. The Lower Colorado River Land Use Plan (USDOI 1964) describes the high wildlife values of Topock Marsh, Topock Gorge, and the Bill Williams River. The document describes their “prime wildlife values” and expresses a need to “improve their management and production and preserve their scenic qualities”. In 1994, the Service developed a Comprehensive Management Plan (CMP) for the lower Colorado River refuges (USFWS 1994). The CMP describes the desired future conditions of the refuge and provides long-range guidance and management direction to achieve refuge purposes; help fulfill the National Wildlife Refuge System (Refuge System) mission; maintain, and where appropriate, restore the ecological integrity of each refuge and the Refuge System; help achieve the goals of the National Wilderness Preservation System; and meet other mandates. NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM MISSION: “The mission of the System is to administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management and, where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans” (National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Public Law 105-57). Draft Compatibility Determination for Hunting on Havasu NWR 1 DESCRIPTION OF USE: What is the use? The refuge allows hunting opportunities for mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), white-winged dove (Zenaida asiatica), Eurasian collared-dove (Streptopelia decaocto), African collared-dove (Streptopelia roseogrisea), duck species permitted by the State of Arizona, American coot (Fulica americana), common gallinule (Gallinula galeata), dark geese, light geese, Wilson’s snipe (Gallinago delicata), Gambel’s quail(Callipepla gambelii), desert cottontail rabbit (Sylvilagus audubonii), black-tailed jackrabbit (Lepus californicus), desert bighorn sheep, bobcat (Lynx rufus), coyote (Canis latrans), gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), kit fox (Vulpes macrotis), and feral swine (Sus scrofa). Where is the use conducted? There are seven management units on Havasu NWR, five of which are available for hunting. Not all species may be hunted in all units and varying State and refuge regulations apply. Upland game, migratory bird hunting, big game hunting, is allowed in the Topock Marsh East Management Unit (7,240 acres). The Pintail Slough Management Unit (443 acres) is open to upland game and migratory bird hunting. The Topock Marsh West Management Unit (6,065 acres) is open to upland game hunting. Big game hunting is open in the Pintail Slough and Topock West management units with the incidental take of feral swine by hunters participating in other hunting opportunities. The Havasu Wilderness Management Unit (15,021 acres) is open to upland game and big game hunting but will close to all waterfowl hunting to serve as a waterfowl sanctuary. The Lake Havasu Management Unit (3,870 acres) is open to migratory bird, upland game, and big game hunting south of Blankenship Bend to the boundary of the Lake Havasu City limits. All units are accessible by foot and most are accessible by boat. Big game hunting at Havasu NWR includes the incidental take of feral swine by hunters participating in established hunt opportunities and the AZGFD managed desert bighorn sheep hunts within the Topock Marsh East and Havasu Wilderness management units. These areas are within AZGFD game management units 15D and 16B. Lottery sheep hunt permits are issued by AZGFD. No hunting is permitted within the Mesquite Bay Management Unit (232 acres) which is located within the Lake Havasu City limits. No hunting is permitted in the Topock Gorge Management Unit (4,644 acres), which is comprised of all the waters of the Colorado River and those refuge lands within 1/4 mile (.4 kilometer) of the waters of the Colorado River from Blankenship Bend northward through the Topock Gorge to Interstate 40 bridge. The refuge is unable to support safe hunting activities in these areas because of high-density visitation by millions of recreational boaters. Both of these management units combined provide a one-fifth of the total waterfowl sanctuary acres. When is the use conducted? Regulations follow the respective State’s rules and seasons (table 1) with additional refuge restrictions for some species on hunting hours, methods of take, and/or season length. A permit system is employed within the Pintail Slough Quota Hunt Area and hunting may only occur Wednesdays, Saturdays, and Sundays from 1/2 hour before legal sunrise until 2 p.m. MST during waterfowl season. Night hunting is not allowed for any species. Draft Compatibility Determination for Hunting on Havasu NWR 2 Table 1.—Havasu NWR established hunts: Species and hunting dates. Species Approximate dates based on AZ State season Mourning dove September 1–September 15 (early AZ season) November 20–January 3 (late* AZ season) White-winged dove September 1–September 15 (early AZ season) Eurasian collared-dove, African collared-dove September 1–March 15 (Havasu NWR season) Duck, American coot, common gallinule, dark October 23–February 7 (AZ State season*) geese, light geese, Wilson’s snipe Gambel’s quail October 17–February 7 (AZ State season*) Desert cottontail rabbit September 1–March 15 (Havasu NWR season) Black-tailed jackrabbit September 1–March 15 (Havasu NWR season) Desert bighorn sheep December 1–December 31 (AZ State season*) Bobcat, coyote, gray fox, and kit fox September 1–March 15 (Havasu NWR season) Feral swine September 1–March 15 (incidental take only) * Some hunt dates change annually in AZGFD regulations, please refer to AZGFD regulations for species seasons and hunt dates. How is the use conducted? Hunting of mourning dove, white-winged dove, duck, American coot common gallinule, dark geese, light geese, and Wilson’s snipe hunt dates align with state regulations for the above species in all permitted hunt areas with the exception of Pintail Slough Quota Hunt Area. A permit system is employed within the Pintail Slough Quota Hunt Area. Methods of take for these species on the refuge are federally approved non-toxic shot only and include shotgun, crossbow, and archery. The use of dogs is permitted. The refuge provides approximately 60 hunt days for mourning and white-winged dove. Methods of take permitted on the refuge are federally approved non-toxic shot only and include shotgun, archery, and crossbow. Hunting of Eurasian and African collared-dove is permitted following the above regulations for mourning and white-winged dove approximately 196 hunt days and muzzleloader, handgun, and pneumatic weapons are allowed as additional methods of take. Gambel’s quail hunt dates align with State regulations for the aforementioned species in all permitted hunt areas with the exception of Pintail Slough Quota Hunt Area. A permit system is employed in the Pintail Slough Quota Hunt Area. Methods of take permitted on the refuge are federally approved non-toxic ammunition only and include shotgun, handgun, pneumatic weapons, archery, and crossbow. The harvest of desert cottontail rabbit, black-tailed jackrabbit, bobcat, coyote, gray fox, and kit fox is permitted within Pintail Slough, Topock Marsh East, Topock Marsh West, Havasu Wilderness, and Lake Havasu management units. Incidental take of upland game species within Pintail Slough Quota Hunt Area may only occur by permitted hunters. Methods of take permitted on the refuge are federally approved non-toxic ammunition only and include shotgun, handgun, muzzleloaders, pneumatic weapons, archery, and crossbow. The incidental take of feral swine by Draft Compatibility Determination for Hunting on Havasu NWR 3 individuals participating in established hunt opportunities on the refuge follows the above listed regulations for upland game species like desert cottontail rabbit. Desert bighorn sheep hunting consists of the AZGFD managed hunt within the Topock Marsh East and Havasu Wilderness management units. Methods of take for desert bighorn sheep are in full alignment with the State of Arizona and include rifle, handgun, muzzleloader, shotgun, archery, crossbow, and pneumatic weapons. These areas are encompassed within AZGFD game management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 905 Xxii. Appendix
    APPENDIX 905 XXII. APPENDIX 1. Arizona Desert Wilderness Act of 1990 PUBLIC LAW 101–628—NOV. 28, 1990 104 STAT. 4469 Public Law 101–628 101st Congress An Act To provide for the designation of certain public lands as wilderness in the State of Nov. 28, 1990 Arizona. [H.R. 2570] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.—Titles I through III of this Act may be Arizona Desert cited as the “Arizona Desert Wilderness Act of 1990”. Wilderness Act of 1990. TITLE I—DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS AREAS TO BE 16 USC 460ddd ADMINISTERED BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT note. National Wilderness SEC. 101. DESIGNATION AND MANAGEMENT. Preservation System. (a) DESIGNATION.—In furtherance of the purposes of the 16 USC 1132 Wilderness Act, the following public lands are hereby designated as note. wilderness and therefore, as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System: (1) certain lands in Mohave County, Arizona, which comprise approximately 23,600 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled “Mount Wilson Wilderness” and dated February 1990, and which shall be known as the Mount Wilson Wilderness; (2) certain lands in Mohave County, Arizona, which comprise approximately 31,070 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled “Mount Tipton Wilderness” and dated February 1990, and which shall be known as the Mount Tipton Wilderness; (3) certain lands in Mohave County, Arizona, which comprise approximately 27,530 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled
    [Show full text]
  • West Wide Energy Corridors Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement – Talking Points
    West Wide Energy Corridors Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement – Talking Points The proposed designations in Draft Programmatic EIS (PEIS) will have significant impacts to wildlife habitat, cultural resources, recreation opportunities, and many other resources on federal lands across the west. Once designated, the corridors (averaging 3500 feet wide but ranging up to 5 miles in width) will cover 6,000 miles and almost 3 million acres of public lands. Areas within the designated corridors are essentially deemed appropriate for pipelines and powerlines, with expedited construction applications and limited environmental review. With large-scale buildup likely within these corridors - the PEIS contemplates that about 9 individual 500-kv transmission lines, as many as 35 liquid petroleum pipelines or up to 29 natural gas pipelines could be supported within a single 3,500-foot- wide corridor – public involvement in the planning process is crucial to ensure that the designation of these corridors is a positive step for our public lands. Key points to raise at public meetings include: By taking the responsibility to move forward with a process to designate large swaths of our federal lands as places for oil, gas and hydrogen pipelines and power lines, the government also took on the responsibility of doing it right. Doing it right would involve ensuring that: new pipelines or powerlines are actually needed – agencies should analyze the potential to meet growing energy demands through increased energy efficiency, distributed generation and maximizing the use of the existing power grid through technology upgrades before turning to additional or wider corridors on our public land; federal lands are necessary locations and special or sensitive public lands are avoided altogether – agencies should continue analyzing impacts to special public lands and moving corridors to avoid them.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment
    Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment Quarry Operations –Yuma Area Office Lower Colorado River Region U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Yuma Area Office Yuma, Arizona August 2007 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment Quarry Operations – Yuma Area Office Lower Colorado River Region prepared by Yuma Area Office Resource Management Office Environmental Planning and Compliance Group Jason Associates Corporation Yuma Office Contract No. 03-PE-34-0230 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Yuma Area Office Yuma, Arizona August 2007 Acronyms and Abbreviations ADEQ Arizona Department of Environmental Quality APCD Air Pollution Control District AQMD Air Quality Management District BCO Biological and Conference Opinion BMPs Best Management Practices BLM U.S. Bureau of Land Management CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards CARB California Air Resources Board CESA California Endangered Species Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations CO Carbon monoxide CRFWLS Colorado River Front Work and Levee System CRIT Colorado River Indian Tribes DM Departmental Manual DTSC Department
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment
    Draft Environmental Assessment Hunting and Fishing Program on Havasu National Wildlife Refuge April 2021 Prepared by Havasu NWR 317 Mesquite Avenue Needles, CA 92363 Estimated Lead Agency Total Costs Associated with Developing and Producing this EA: $16,000 Contents Proposed Action ..........................................................................................................................1 Background .................................................................................................................................2 Purpose and Need for the Action ................................................................................................3 Alternatives .................................................................................................................................3 Alternative A—Current Management (No-Action Alternative) .................................................3 Alternative B—Expansion of Hunting Opportunities (Proposed Action Alternative) .................5 Alternative C—Expansion of Hunting Opportunities, Including Mule Deer ...............................6 Alternative(s) Considered but Dismissed from Further Consideration .....................................6 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ...........................................................7 Natural Resources ...................................................................................................................8 Hunted Species—Waterfowl (Ducks, American Coot, and Geese), Common Gallinule,
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Affected Environment
    Chapter Three Chapter 3 Affected Environment 3.1 Introduction Chapter 3 describes environmental resources (e.g., hydrologic, biologic, and socioeconomic) of the Colorado River Basin that could be affected by the proposed federal action and the range of alternatives for implementing the proposed federal action described in Chapter 1 and Chapter 2, respectively. The extent to which each specific resource may be impacted is discussed in Chapter 4. Section 3.2 presents a general discussion of the geographic scope within which potential effects of the alternatives are analyzed, and describes each of the potentially affected Colorado River reaches and water service areas. Subsequent sections in this chapter describe specific resources that may be potentially affected, such as water deliveries, recreation and biologic resources. Each resource section contains a discussion of one or more specific issues identified for consideration through scoping, public review and comment, and internal review (Chapter 1, Table 1.5-1). Final EIS – Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for 3-1 October 2007 Lake Powell and Lake Mead Affected Environment Chapter 3 This page intentionally left blank. Final EIS – Colorado River Interim Guidelines for October 2007 3-2 Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead Chapter 3 Affected Environment 3.2 Geographic Scope The proposed federal action considers modified operations of Lake Powell and Lake Mead over a wide range of reservoir elevations as addressed by the four operational elements discussed in Section 1.2, i.e., shortage conditions, coordinated operations of Lake Powell and Lake Mead, storage and delivery of Colorado River system and non-system water, and the modified ISG.
    [Show full text]
  • LHC 18-19 Guide Web 112118 (1).Pdf
    www.azrelocationguides.com Lake Havasu Location & Climate .............................. 2 City Community Profile ............................3-4 History ................................................5-6 Education ............................................. 7 Cultural Arts .......................................... 8 Health Care .....................................9-11 Welcome to Lake Havasu City, one of the most beautiful vacation Adult Living ......................................... 12 Recreation .....................................13-16 destinations and desirable places to relocate to in Arizona. Lighthouses ......................................... 17 Golf ..................................................... 18 Lake Havasu came in to being in 1938 when Parker Dam was Day Trips ........................................19-21 constructed on the Colorado River, providing a plentiful water Resources supply to residents, businesses, and many recreational activities. Upcoming Events ...................22-23 Restaurants .............................24-25 Lake Havasu is forty-five miles long with four hundred fifty Lake Havasu, Places of Worship ....................... 26 miles of scenic shoreline, making it an excellent place for the accessibility Organization & Clubs ................. 26 most every type of water recreation. The city was established to the larger Important Numbers ...............27-28 in 1963 by Robert P. McCulloch as a self sufficient, metropolitan Advertisers Index ............................... 28 planned community,
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilderness Act of 1964
    The Wilderness Act of 1964 Source: US House of Representatives Office of the Law This is the 1964 act that started it all Revision Counsel website at and created the first designated http://uscode.house.gov/download/ascii.shtml wilderness in the US and Nevada. This version, updated January 2, 2006, includes a list of all wilderness designated before that date. The list does not mention designations made by the December 2006 White Pine County bill. -CITE- 16 USC CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM 01/02/2006 -EXPCITE- TITLE 16 - CONSERVATION CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM -HEAD- CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM -MISC1- Sec. 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of policy; wilderness areas; administration for public use and enjoyment, protection, preservation, and gathering and dissemination of information; provisions for designation as wilderness areas. (b) Management of area included in System; appropriations. (c) "Wilderness" defined. 1132. Extent of System. (a) Designation of wilderness areas; filing of maps and descriptions with Congressional committees; correction of errors; public records; availability of records in regional offices. (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classifications as primitive areas; Presidential recommendations to Congress; approval of Congress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Eagles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado. (c) Review by Secretary of the Interior of roadless areas of national park system and national wildlife refuges and game ranges and suitability of areas for preservation as wilderness; authority of Secretary of the Interior to maintain roadless areas in national park system unaffected. (d) Conditions precedent to administrative recommendations of suitability of areas for preservation as wilderness; publication in Federal Register; public hearings; views of State, county, and Federal officials; submission of views to Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presidency and America's Public Lands
    Executive Power in Unlikely Places: The Presidency and America's Public Lands Author: Maria Lynn McCollester Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:107219 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2016 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Executive Power in Unlikely Places: The Presidency and America’s Public Lands Maria Lynn McCollester A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the department of Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Boston College Morrissey College of Arts and Sciences Graduate School September 2016 © Copyright 2016 Maria Lynn McCollester Executive Power in Unlikely Places: The Presidency and America’s Public Lands Maria McCollester Advisor: Marc Landy, Ph.D. By examining the interactions between the presidency and the other branches of government, research illuminates the causes and mechanisms by which the presidency, and its power, ebbs and flows. Due to the nature of the powers directly granted to the president within the Constitution, much consideration has been given to presidential power through the prisms of national security, international affairs, and times of national emergency. Yet the presidency consists of more than the roles of commander- and diplomat-in-chief. By looking beyond the more obvious considerations of presidential power, the complexity of the institution’s development is not only revealed, but more fully explained. Consequently, this dissertation analyzes the development of presidential power by looking at the less obvious. It considers the use of formal executive tools to implement congressionally delegated and supported authority in an area of domestic policy: the creation of federally protected public lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Havasu NWR Draft Hunting and Fishing Plan I
    Havasu National Wildlife Refuge Draft Hunting and Fishing Plan April 2021 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Havasu National Wildlife Refuge 317 Mesquite Ave. Needles, CA 92363 Submitted By: Havasu NWR Refuge Manager Signature Date: Concurrence: Refuge Supervisor Signature Date: Approved: Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System Signature Date: Contents I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................1 II. Statement of Objectives ......................................................................................................3 III. Description of Hunting and Fishing Program ........................................................................4 A. Areas to be Opened to Hunting and Fishing ......................................................................4 B. Species to be Taken, Hunting Periods, Hunting Access ....................................................10 1. MIGRATORY BIRD HUNTING: ...................................................................................12 2. UPLAND GAME HUNTING: .......................................................................................13 3. BIG GAME HUNTING: ...............................................................................................13 4. SPORT FISHING: .......................................................................................................14 C. Hunter and Angler Permit Requirements ........................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 103-433 103D Congress an Act
    PUBLIC LAW 103-433—OCT. 31, 1994 108 STAT. 4471 Public Law 103-433 103d Congress An Act To designate certain lands in the California Desert as wilderness, to establish Oct. 31, 1994 the Death Valley and Joshua Tree National Parks, to establish the Mojave National Preserve, and for other purposes. [S. 21] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Conservation. SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. California Desert Sections 1 and 2, and titles I through IX of this Act may Protection Act of be cited as the "California Desert Protection Act of 1994". 1994. 16 use 410aaa SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND POLICY. note. Short title. (a) The Congress finds and declares that— Supra. (1) the federally owned desert lands of southern California 16 use 410aaa constitute a public wildland resource of extraordinary and ines­ note. timable value for this and future generations; (2) these desert wildlands display unique scenic, historical, archeological, environmental, ecological, wildlife, cultural, sci­ entific, educational, and recreational values used and enjoyed by milUons of Americans for hiking and camping, scientific study and scenic appreciation; (3) the public land resources of the California desert now face and are increasingly threatened by adverse pressures which would impair, dilute, and destroy their public and natural values; (4) the California desert, embracing wilderness lands, units of the National Park System, other Federal lands. State parks and other State lands, and private lands, constitutes a cohesive unit posing unique and difficult resource protection and management challenges; (5) through designation of national monuments by Presi­ dential proclamation, through enactment of general public land statutes (including section 601 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 90 Stat.
    [Show full text]
  • XXI. APPENDIX a 1. Brown V. Board of Education National Historic Site Public Law 102–525 102D Congress An
    514 APPENDIX A XXI. APPENDIX A 1. Brown v. Board of Education National Historic Site 106 STAT. 3438 PUBLIC LAW 102–525—OCT. 26, 1992 Public Law 102–525 102d Congress An Act Oct. 26, 1992 To provide for the establishment of the Brown v. Board of Education National [S. 2890] Historic Site in the State of Kansas, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Civil rights. United States of America in Congress assembled, 16 USC 461 note. TITLE I—BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE SEC. 101. DEFINITIONS. As used in this title— (1) the term “Secretary” means the Secretary of the Interior. (2) The term “historic site” means the Brown v. Board of Education National Historic Site as established in section 103. SEC. 102. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES. (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds as follows: (1) The Supreme Court, in 1954, ruled that the earlier 1896 Supreme Court decision in Plessy v. Ferguson that permitted segregation of races in elementary schools violated the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution, which guarantees all citizens equal protection under the law. (2) In the 1954 proceedings, Oliver Brown and twelve other plaintiffs successfully challenged an 1879 Kansas law that had been patterned after the law in question in Plessy v. Ferguson after the Topeka, Kansas, Board of Education refused to enroll Mr. Brown’s daughter, Linda. (3) Sumner Elementary, the all-white school that refused to enroll Linda Brown, and Monroe Elementary, the segregated school she was forced to attend, have subsequently been designated National Historic Landmarks in recognition of their national significance.
    [Show full text]