Mediaobrazovanie), 2019, 59(2)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mediaobrazovanie), 2019, 59(2) Media Education (Mediaobrazovanie), 2019, 59(2) Copyright © 2019 by Academic Publishing House Researcher s.r.o. Published in the Slovak Republic Media Education (Mediaobrazovanie) Has been issued since 2005 ISSN 1994-4160 E-ISSN 1994-4195 2019, 59(2): 243-248 DOI: 10.13187/me.2019.2.243 www.ejournal53.com The Heritage of Yuri Lotman, Umberto Eco and Vladimir Propp in the Context of Media Literacy Education Alexander Fedorov a , * a Rostov State University of Economics, Russian Federation Abstract The material for this article was the works of V. Propp, Y. Lotman and U. Eco in the context of semiotic approaches and media educational opportunities. The author of the article fully agrees with U. Eco's opinion that modern society is unthinkable without (self) media education of a person, because in the near future our society will split into two – those who do without critical selection of received information in their contacts with the media, and those who are able to select and process information. At the same time, it is necessary to teach people to choose the most important and useful things, because if they do not learn to do so, access to all this information will be completely useless. Thus, the selection and processing/reasoning/analysis of media texts is the basis of media competence in the 21st century. Studying the media and virtual world requires knowledge and skills from different fields. In this context, the scientific heritage of V. Propp, Y. Lotman and U. Eco is truly inexhaustible and fits perfectly into the main spectrum of media education tasks, both at higher and secondary schools. Keywords: Propp, Lotman, Eco, media texts, media literacy, students, school, university. 1. Introduction In the pragmatic era of the 21st century, the importance of "classical" humanitarian knowledge is diminished not only by technocrats. On the one hand, "the notion that 'serious people' involved in the exact sciences – and even more so in the creation of new techniques – may be ignorant of the structural modeling of artistic and cultural objects (Lotman, 1992: 30), since they have, as they say, another "higher" mission, remains quite stable at the technocratic level. On the other hand, the most prominent characters in the media's close attention, apart from political leaders, are usually not genius scientists and cultural figures, but criminals (of course, not ordinary thieves, but more "vivid specimens" – serial killers, sexual maniacs, pedophiles, etc.) in conjunction with glamorous representatives of the show business. The latter become "experts" in the field of ethics and culture, whose views are mass replicated by television, radio, the press and the Internet. This phenomenon in itself is not new: A.P. Chekhov described with irony in his brilliant story First Class Passenger (1886) the conversation between two outstanding, but unknown to the general public scientists – an engineer and an academician. With undisguised regret, the engineer who had recently won the first prize in a professional competition tells his vis-a-vis: "I could point out to you the many of my contemporaries, people of great talent and hard work, but who died in the unknown. All these Russian navigators, chemists, physicists, mechanics, farmers – are they * Corresponding author E-mail addresses: [email protected] (A.V. Fedorov) 243 Media Education (Mediaobrazovanie), 2019, 59(2) popular? Are Russian artists, sculptors and literary people known to our educated masses? (...) and in parallel to these people I will bring you hundreds of all kinds of singers, acrobats and jesters, known even to little child" (Chekhov, 1886: 1145–1146). Another thing is that this trend exactly noticed by A.P. Chekhov has become dominant today. The "media persons" have separated from the mass audience not only scientists, but also figures of "old-fashioned" art. At the same time, opinions are increasingly expressed about the usefulness and correctness of spontaneous education in the sphere of (media) culture (Razlogov, 2005: 69). And the results of this "spontaneity" have long been felt not only by the professors of media and art universities, who are forced to make a set of applicants who know almost nothing about the history of art, classical works of art and literature, but also by ordinary school teachers who try to somehow draw the attention of "computer–advanced" and "familiar with the media" schoolchildren to the existence of culture. One of the most important tasks of media literacy education is to develop the ability of the audience to analyze media texts of different types and genres, including artistic ones. And here the works of outstanding scientists V.Y. Propp (1895–1970), Y.M. Lotman (1922–1993) and U. Eco (1932–2016), who have been studying the phenomenon of the text for many years, can provide invaluable assistance to the media educator. It is interesting that Y.M. Lotman had a chance to listen to lectures by V.Y. Propp and to talk to U. Eco many times. In addition to that, both Y. Lotman and U. Eco in their works repeatedly addressed to the research of V. Propp and highly appreciated them. There was also mutual respect between Y. Lotman and U. Eco, they understood the importance of each other's creativity. U. Eco wrote a preface to the English edition of works by Y. Lotman (Eco, 1996), and Y. Lotman – to the Russian edition of the famous Eco’s novel The Name of the Rose. In his article about Umberto Eco Yuri Lotman, in particular, wrote that when they met in Italy, he asked him when he would come to the Soviet Union. "Only after you have my novel published," he replied (Lotman, 1989: 481). The novel The Name of the Rose was published in Russian before the collapse of the Soviet Union, but, unfortunately, U. Eco came to Russia after the death of Yuri Lotman ... 2. Materials and methods The material for this article was the works of V. Propp, Y. Lotman and U. Eco in the context of semiotic approaches and media educational opportunities. Let's remind that the semiotic analysis of media texts is understood as the analysis of the language of signs and symbols; the given analysis is closely connected with the iconographic analysis. Semiotic Approach (Le decodage des medias) is based on semiotic theory of media, which is substantiated in the works of such media theorists of semiotic (structuralist) area as R. Barthes (Barthes, 1964), C. Metz (Metz, 1964), Y. Lotman (Lotman, 1992), U. Eco (Eco, 1960; 1976; 1998), etc. 3. Discussion and results Y.M. Lotman rightly emphasized that "the text appears before us not as a realization of the message in any one language, but as a complex device that stores a variety of codes, capable of transforming the received messages and generating new ones, as an information generator with features of intellectual personality. In connection with this, there is a change in the perception of the attitude of the consumer and the text. Instead of the formula "the consumer deciphers the text" it is possible to be more precise – "the consumer communicates with the text". He comes into contact with the text. The process of deciphering the text becomes extremely complicated and loses its one–time and final character, approaching the familiar acts of semiotic communication of a person with another autonomous personality" (Lotman, 1992: 132). Probably, we can agree that "all texts existing in the history of human culture – artistic and non–artistic – are divided into two groups: one of them seems to answer the question: "What is it? (or "How does it work?"), and the second is "How did it happen?" (Lotman, 1973). Lotman conventionally called the texts of the first group "plotless", and the second group "having a plot", precisely defining that "plotless texts affirm some order, regularity, and classification. (…). These texts are static in nature. If they describe movements, they are movements that are regularly and correctly repeated, always equal to themselves" (Loman, 1973). This point of view of Y.M. Lotman practically coincides with V.P. Demin's reflections that the known detective characters – Sherlock Holmes, Hercule Poirot and Maigret – "figures rather conditional, calculatedly constructed for performance of the functions. The illusion of life arises as 244 Media Education (Mediaobrazovanie), 2019, 59(2) our response to the feeling of their successful construction. (…). The famous Aristotle's phrase about drama, which is impossible without intrigue and possible without characters, nowhere is it more appropriate than in relation to the detective. The detective story is possible without detailed descriptions, without landscape beauties and memorable characteristics, without a deeply worked out social background and half–tone nuances in the dialogues. But without inventively developed intrigue – no" (Demin, 1977: 238). It is clear that in the process of media literacy education of schoolchildren or students it is much easier (at least – at the first stage of training) to address to the media texts, which have stable structural codes, in other words, to the works, which have a pronounced fairytale, mythological basis, or the basis of the entertainment genre. Here, the best guides to the analysis of media texts can be found in works by V.Y. Propp, which clearly identify the main story situations and typology of characters in the fairy tale genre (Propp, 1998: 60–61). Our previous publications provided examples of the analysis of specific audiovisual media texts (Fedorov, 2008: 60–80; 2009: 4–13), based on the methodology of V.Y. Propp. The analysis of media texts and other mass genres, such as detective and thriller, is based on a similar principle (Bykov, 2010; Demin, 1977: 238; Eco, 1960: 52; Shklovsky, 1929: 142; Todorov, 1977: 49). And this type of analysis can also be successfully used in media pedagogy.
Recommended publications
  • The Semiosphere, Between Informational Modernity and Ecological Postmodernity Pierre-Louis Patoine Et Jonathan Hope
    Document généré le 28 sept. 2021 03:48 Recherches sémiotiques Semiotic Inquiry The Semiosphere, Between Informational Modernity and Ecological Postmodernity Pierre-Louis Patoine et Jonathan Hope J. M. Lotman Résumé de l'article Volume 35, numéro 1, 2015 Parmi les notions développées par Lotman, celle de sémiopshère est certainement celle qui a été la plus commentée. Dans cet article, nous URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1050984ar explorons ses dimensions écologiques et biologiques, en remontant au concept DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/1050984ar de biosphère proposé par Vernadsky et à la vision environnementale de l’art qui apparaît chez Lotman dès La Structure du texte artistique. Notre enquête Aller au sommaire du numéro expose les aspects biosémiotiques de la pensée lotmanienne, aspects qui permettent l’émergence, en son sein, d’un modèle cyclique, homéostatique de la culture, contrebalançant ainsi une vision moderniste où l’art participe à un progrès naïvement linéaire. Éditeur(s) Association canadienne de sémiotique / Canadian Semiotic Association ISSN 0229-8651 (imprimé) 1923-9920 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Patoine, P.-L. & Hope, J. (2015). The Semiosphere, Between Informational Modernity and Ecological Postmodernity. Recherches sémiotiques / Semiotic Inquiry, 35(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.7202/1050984ar Tous droits réservés © Association canadienne de sémiotique / Canadian Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des Semiotic Association, 2018 services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heroic Fairy Tale Villain
    The Heroic Fairy Tale Villain Application of Vladimir Propp’s formalist schema to the creation of a revisionist cinematic fairy tale in which the traditional villain is transformed into an anti-hero. Scott Hamilton B.E., Dip. Film & Television Production. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Fine Arts (Research). School of Creative Practice Faculty of Creative Industries, Education and Social Justice Queensland University of Technology 2021 Keywords Screenwriting, screenplay structure, feature film, revisionist fairy tale, character, archetype, hero, anti-hero, villain, protagonist, antagonist. i Abstract Recent trends in the Hollywood film industry have seen a rise in revisionist fairy tale films in which the traditional literary story villain has been transformed into a cinematic anti-hero. Although many of these commercial blockbuster films have been financially successful at the box office, they are often criticised for their reliance on the Hero’s Journey structural approach of Christopher Vogler, which is a mainstay in Hollywood hero-origin style narratives. This creative practice-led research analyses this character transformation construct and addresses this criticism by formulating a new approach to screenplay structure. This is achieved by utilising the formalist schema of literary Russian fairy tales outlined by Vladimir Propp in Morphology of the Folktale—which has thus far primarily been used within Film Studies academia as an analysis tool of pre-existing film texts and not as a screenplay development tool—and mapping it to Syd Field’s three-act structural paradigm, which is the dominant narrative structure in mainstream Hollywood cinema. Transformation of the villain to anti-hero and application of this new structural approach was used in the writing of this exegesis’ creative work The Devil’s Symphony, a feature-length dramatic screenplay based on the fairy tale The Pied Piper of Hamelin.
    [Show full text]
  • Semiosphere As a Model of Human Cognition
    494 Aleksei Semenenko Sign Systems Studies 44(4), 2016, 494–510 Homo polyglottus: Semiosphere as a model of human cognition Aleksei Semenenko Department of Slavic and Baltic Languages Stockholm University 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Th e semiosphere is arguably the most infl uential concept developed by Juri Lotman, which has been reinterpreted in a variety of ways. Th is paper returns to Lotman’s original “anthropocentric” understanding of semiosphere as a collective intellect/consciousness and revisits the main arguments of Lotman’s discussion of human vs. nonhuman semiosis in order to position it in the modern context of cognitive semiotics and the question of human uniqueness in particular. In contrast to the majority of works that focus on symbolic consciousness and multimodal communication as specifi cally human traits, Lotman accentuates polyglottism and dialogicity as the unique features of human culture. Formulated in this manner, the concept of semiosphere is used as a conceptual framework for the study of human cognition as well as human cognitive evolution. Keywords: semiosphere; cognition; polyglottism; dialogue; multimodality; Juri Lotman Th e concept of semiosphere is arguably the most infl uential concept developed by the semiotician and literary scholar Juri Lotman (1922–1993), a leader of the Tartu- Moscow School of Semiotics and a founder of semiotics of culture. In a way, it was the pinnacle of Lotman’s lifelong study of culture as an intrinsic component of human individual
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Narrative-Based Educational Software
    AN ANALYSIS OF NARRATIVE-BASED EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE by DAVID NOAH (Under the direction of Lloyd Rieber) ABSTRACT Instructional designers often rely on stories to structure interactive learning environments. There is little evidence that they bring contemporary critical theory to these designs, especially as it pertains to the narratological implications of a hypermedia environment. The use of stories in these designs raises issues about the relationship between learning, interactivity, and story. Interactivity undermines traditional narrative structures, diminishing their power as structural agents. However, it also creates constructivist affordances for the instructional designer. How are designers resolving this conflict? How are they using story? This research study examines the use of story and instructional design in selected educational CD-ROMs. The works of Propp, Campbell, and Gagne are used as models for the analysis of the stories and instructional events. The results indicate that instructional presentation in narrative environments is usually sequestered from the main narrative, though there is some relation between story elements and instructional design. The designers do use story to engage learner attention, though there is little consistent correlation with the story models chosen for this research. Character transformation, important in narrative, is not addressed in the software. Simulations offer the most integrated approach to story and instruction, but at the cost of traditional story models. I conclude that story and instruction are largely incommensurable when instantiated within a hypermedia environment. Instruction is transparent in the sense that we go to it in order to get something else: learning. On the other hand, story is opaque in the sense that it is an end in itself.
    [Show full text]
  • The Semiosphere, Between Informational Modernity and Ecological Postmodernity Pierre-Louis Patoine and Jonathan Hope
    Document generated on 09/29/2021 12:07 a.m. Recherches sémiotiques Semiotic Inquiry The Semiosphere, Between Informational Modernity and Ecological Postmodernity Pierre-Louis Patoine and Jonathan Hope J. M. Lotman Article abstract Volume 35, Number 1, 2015 The notion of semiosphere is certainly one of Lotman’s most discussed ideas. In this essay, we propose to investigate its ecological and biological dimensions, URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1050984ar tracing them back to Vernadsky’s concept of biosphere and to Lotman’s DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1050984ar environmental vision of art articulated in his early work, The Structure of the Artistic Text. Our investigation reveals how the biosemiotic undercurrents in See table of contents Lotmanian thought enable the emergence of a cyclical, homeostatic model of culture that counterbalances a Modernist vision of art as a force working for unquestioned linear progress. Publisher(s) Association canadienne de sémiotique / Canadian Semiotic Association ISSN 0229-8651 (print) 1923-9920 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Patoine, P.-L. & Hope, J. (2015). The Semiosphere, Between Informational Modernity and Ecological Postmodernity. Recherches sémiotiques / Semiotic Inquiry, 35(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.7202/1050984ar Tous droits réservés © Association canadienne de sémiotique / Canadian This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit Semiotic Association, 2018 (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal.
    [Show full text]
  • Alf Arvidsson Vladimir Propp's Fairy Tale Morphology and Game Studies
    Computer games as fiction and social interaction A project sponsored by Vetenskapsrådet, 2003-2005 Institutionen för kultur och medier Umeå universitet Alf Arvidsson Vladimir Propp’s fairy tale morphology and game studies Working paper Vladimir Propp’s model of the structure of fairy tales has since its introduction to western scholarship during the 1950s, been regarded as one of the milestones in semiotic analysis and narratology, both for its inspiring function and taken for face value. It comes as no surprise that it also is suggested as a work of significance for game studies. I can agree on that; however, its meaning within the field of folklore studies and its range of appliability must be discussed. What is the content of Propp’s model? How has its basic ideas been further developed by later generations of folklorists? How can it be used? What claims can be based on it? What are its limits? My questions are trigged by the claims that sometimes are made for a universal applicability of Propp’s 31-function pattern. For instance, Arthur Asa Berger states in a recent introductory book, Video Games:A Popular Culture phenomenon, that “His thirty-one functions … are, it can be argued, at the heart of all narratives – not just the Russian folktales Propp analyzed in obtaining his list” (Berger 2002:34). I can agree with Berger that Propp’s model is worthy of attention in narrative studies. However, the claims of its universality go to far. It goes beyond the russian folktales, but halts somewhere after. The historical scientific context of Propp’s study is European folk tale studies, as they were in the 1920s with a history going back to the Grimm brothers showing the contemporary existence of an oral narrative genre with presumably ancient roots, within the popular classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Tales of magic In Japan and Norway Tiril Bryn Thesis submitted for the degree of Candidata Philologiae in Cultural History Department of Culture studies and Oriental Languages 23rd of April 2007 University of Oslo - 1 - Abstract Fairytales are universal expressions that have been used in the nation-building process in both Norway and Japan. I have posed these questions; in what sense are they universal, and how have they been used. My hypothesis is that fairytales contain universal elements connected to the universality of myth, at the same time as they are marked by time, place and customs in the area they are found. I have three Japanese fairytales that I have compared with three Norwegian fairytales with the same AT-number. The fairytales are: AT 302:Momotaro, the Peach Boy and The ogre’s (devil’s) heart in the egg AT 425: Issun Boshi, One-Inch Boy and East of the sun West of the moon. AT 475: Urashima Taro and Friends in life and death. I have analyzed the fairytales in pairs as shown above. I have used Vladimir Propp’s 31 functions to break the tales into components and then I have used different key words to reveal different layers in the stories. Through structure and action, I have looked at the first layer in the fairytales that is connected to the similarities and the universality. The next layer is in between similarities and differences, and I have used the key word symbol images. The last layer is connected to differences and cultural references and the key words here are characters and their attributes.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts 325 LINNAR PRIIMÄGI. the Border of the Semiosphere Yuri M
    Abstracts 325 LINNAR PRIIMÄGI. The border of the semiosphere Yuri M. Lotman’s idea of “semiosphere” resulted from the concept of a “collective memory” as a “model of the “culture as such””. Its genuine meaning can be unveiled by comparison with the “biosphere” of Vladimir Vernadsky, the “monads” of Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, the “Ent” of Parmenides, the “transfinite number” of Georg Cantor, the fractal theory of Benoit Mandelbrot and the “morphology” of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. Keywords: semiosphere, collective memory, Yuri Lotman, biosphere, Vladimir Vernadsky, monad, Leibniz, Parmenides, transfinite number, Georg Cantor, fractal, Benoit Mandelbrot, morphology, J. W. Goethe. BERK VAHER. Creating self in utopian exoticism: Abdul Mati Klarwein's “Milk N' Honey” Inspired by the recent resurgence of academic interest in exoticism, the article elaborates on some of the theoretical vindications of the phenomenon by concentrating on its aspects as the Romantic/Modernist artist’s ultimate act of creating Self through the Other. Not being content with the (largely Westernised) genuine exotic cultures, an exote creates his/her own hybrid utopian sign system where elements of various exotic cultures are blended in order to resolve the overabundance of competing identities and establish a superior, transcendent and all-inclusive identity. The artist Abdul Mati Klarwein is a complex and exciting example of this practice. His aesthetic and spiritual act of creating a utopian exotic Self in the book “Milk N’ Honey” (1973) is essentially a radical rewriting of the Old and New Testaments, including pictures from his self-designed Aleph Sanctuary chapel and texts blending black slang with Jewish humour.
    [Show full text]
  • Tartu Paper Chang
    1 Is Language a Primary Modeling System?--On Jurj Lotman's Semiosphere Professor Han-liang Chang National Taiwan University Paper presented at the International Conference on Cultural Semiotics: Cultural Mechanisms, Boundaries, Identities, in observance of Jurj Lotman’s 80s Anniversary, University of Tartu Tartu, Estonia, 26 February - 2 March 2002 The well-known distinction of primary modeling system versus secondary modeling system suggested by Lotman and others (Lotman 1977) is a lasting legacy of the Ta rtu School's that has been adhered to, modified, and refuted by semioticians of culture and nature (Sebeok 1991, 1994, Sebeok and Danesi 2000).1 Adherence aside, modifications and refutations have focused on the issue whether or not language is a primary modeling system (hereinafter PMS) and, if not, what alternative can be made available to replace it. For both biosemiosis and anthroposemiosis, language can only be a secondary modeling system (hereinafter SMS) on top of the biological experience of Unwelt. As Sebeok and Danesi have recently observed: [L]anguage is, by definition, a secondary cohesive modeling system providing humans with the resources for extending primary forms ad infinitum. From a biosemiotic perspective, the language code can be defined as the cohesive system providing the modeling resources for converting what von Uexküll (1909) called 'concrete living existence' into 'active plans.' (2000: 108) Here our co-authors are reiterating Sebeok's entrenched position over the decades. He had observed in 1989, "Solely in the genus Homo have verbal signs emerged. To put it in another way, only hominids possess two mutually sustaining repertoires of signs, the zoosemiotic nonverbal, plus, superimposed, the anthroposemiotic verbal."(1991: 55).
    [Show full text]
  • Revolutions and Collective Emotions / Lótman Continua a Surpreender
    ARTIGOS http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-457338371 Lótman continua a surpreender: revoluções e emoções coletivas / Lotman Continues to Astonish: Revolutions and Collective Emotions Laura Gherlone* RESUMO Entre 1988 e 1993, Iúri M. Lótman formulou algumas proposições sobre “a voz da massa anônima”: uma voz coletiva que, em certas situacões ligadas a crises de caráter cultural, é portadora de paixões violentas que podem produzir interferências profundas no curso da história. Em seus últimos trabalhos, o semioticista russo postulou, diante disso, a noção de uma semiótica das emoções como objeto de estudo para entender a dinâmica cultural, em especial de períodos tidos como revolucionários ou de transição, a saber, quando a massa anônima é capaz de manipular os eventos ou quando, revendo o passado, confere aos eventos uma interpretação distorcida. Lótman focalizou, principalmente, a relação entre as grandes fraturas históricas, os mecanismos de autopropagação do medo e a criação cultural de bodes expiatórios. O presente estudo visa abordar a reflexão de Lótman sobre perseguição, com especial atenção à figura da mulher durante o fenômeno de caça às bruxas. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Iúri Lotman; Semiótica das emoções; Semiótica do medo; Comportamento social; Caça às bruxas; Bode espiatório ABSTRACT Between 1988 and 1993, Yuri Lotman composed a series of reflections on “the voice of the anonymous mass”: a collective voice that, in particular situations linked to a cultural crisis, is the bearer of striking passions, which can deeply influence history. In his late works, the Russian semiotician postulated, therefore, the idea of a semiotics of emotions as an object of study to understand the dynamics of culture, especially during periods perceived as revolutionary or transitional―namely, when the anonymous mass manipulates the events or, when looking back, gives them a distorted interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Vygotsky, Bakhtin, Lotman: Towards a Theory of Communication in the Horizon of the Other
    Semiotica 2016; 213: 75–90 Laura Gherlone* Vygotsky, Bakhtin, Lotman: Towards a theory of communication in the horizon of the other DOI 10.1515/sem-2015-0031 Abstract: Shortly before his death, Yuri Lotman (1922–1993), by now blind, dictated some considerations on the concept of ‘alien,’‘stranger’ (chuzhdoe): a concept that de facto weaves all of his thirty-year reflections on the relationship between language, meaning, and culture and that, until the end, appears as the mark of a speculative orientation focused on the ethics of otherness. A profound influence on Lotman’s thinking in this direction was exercised by two leading figures of the Russian intellectual tradition: the psychologist Lev Vygotsky (1896–1934) and the philosopher, critic, and literary theorist Mikhail Bakhtin (1895–1975). It is no wonder the Tartu-Moscow Semiotic School dedicated to them volumes IV (1969) and VI (1973), respectively, of the Trudy po znakovym sistemam, the review on sign systems launched in 1964 by the Department of Russian Literature of the University of Tartu. The horizon of otherness, and the consequent emphasis on the relational nature of man, fill in fact as much of Vygotsky’s theoretical reflection on the human mind as does Bakhtin’son literary creation (slovesnost’). This article intends to explore the concept of “dialog” as thematized in Vygotsky’s and Bakhtin’s studies, theoretical roots of the Lotmanian idea of communication as a dialogical semiotic act. Keywords: Vygotsky, Bakhtin, Lotman, language, communication, dialogicity 1 Introduction Lotman’s attention to the idea of an “others’ world” (chuzhoi mir)1 as a cultural problem became very intense beginning in the second half of the 1980s, when he framed Vygotsky’s studies on the historical-cultural dimension of the mental processes of socialization and Bakhtin’s studies on the aesthetic-existential 1 Cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Semiotics ­ Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Semiotics from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    11/03/2016 Semiotics ­ Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Semiotics From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Semiotics (also called semiotic studies; not to be confused with the Saussurean tradition called semiology which is a part of semiotics) is the study of meaning­making, the study of sign processes and meaningful communication.[1] This includes the study of signs and sign processes (semiosis), indication, designation, likeness, analogy, metaphor, symbolism, signification, and communication. Semiotics is closely related to the field of linguistics, which, for its part, studies the structure and meaning of language more specifically. The semiotic tradition explores the study of signs and symbols as a significant part of communications. As different from linguistics, however, semiotics also studies non­linguistic sign systems. Semiotics is often divided into three branches: Semantics: relation between signs and the things to which they refer; their signified denotata, or meaning Syntactics: relations among or between signs in formal structures Pragmatics: relation between signs and sign­using agents or interpreters Semiotics is frequently seen as having important anthropological dimensions; for example, the late Italian novelist Umberto Eco proposed that every cultural phenomenon may be studied as communication.[2] Some semioticians focus on the logical dimensions of the science, however. They examine areas belonging also to the life sciences—such as how organisms make predictions about, and adapt to, their semiotic niche in the world (see semiosis). In general, semiotic theories take signs or sign systems as their object of study: the communication of information in living organisms is covered in biosemiotics (including zoosemiotics). Syntactics is the branch of semiotics that deals with the formal properties of signs and symbols.[3] More precisely, syntactics deals with the "rules that govern how words are combined to form phrases and sentences".
    [Show full text]