The Ecological Significance of Giant Clams in Coral Reef Ecosystems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Ecological Significance of Giant Clams in Coral Reef Ecosystems Biological Conservation 181 (2015) 111–123 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Review The ecological significance of giant clams in coral reef ecosystems ⇑ Mei Lin Neo a,b, William Eckman a, Kareen Vicentuan a,b, Serena L.-M. Teo b, Peter A. Todd a, a Experimental Marine Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore b Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore, 18 Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119227, Singapore article info abstract Article history: Giant clams (Hippopus and Tridacna species) are thought to play various ecological roles in coral reef Received 14 May 2014 ecosystems, but most of these have not previously been quantified. Using data from the literature and Received in revised form 29 October 2014 our own studies we elucidate the ecological functions of giant clams. We show how their tissues are food Accepted 2 November 2014 for a wide array of predators and scavengers, while their discharges of live zooxanthellae, faeces, and Available online 5 December 2014 gametes are eaten by opportunistic feeders. The shells of giant clams provide substrate for colonization by epibionts, while commensal and ectoparasitic organisms live within their mantle cavities. Giant clams Keywords: increase the topographic heterogeneity of the reef, act as reservoirs of zooxanthellae (Symbiodinium spp.), Carbonate budgets and also potentially counteract eutrophication via water filtering. Finally, dense populations of giant Conservation Epibiota clams produce large quantities of calcium carbonate shell material that are eventually incorporated into Eutrophication the reef framework. Unfortunately, giant clams are under great pressure from overfishing and extirpa- Giant clams tions are likely to be detrimental to coral reefs. A greater understanding of the numerous contributions Hippopus giant clams provide will reinforce the case for their conservation. Tridacna Ó 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license Zooxanthellae (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Contents 1. Introduction . ...................................................................................................... 112 2. Methods . ...................................................................................................... 112 2.1. Literature survey . ......................................................................................... 112 2.2. Population estimates of ecologically relevant parameters . ...................................................... 112 3. Giant clams as food . ................................................................................... 114 3.1. Productivity and biomass ......................................................................................... 114 3.2. Food for predators and scavengers. ......................................................................... 115 3.3. Expelled materials. ......................................................................................... 115 4. Giant clams as shelter . ................................................................................... 117 4.1. Shelters for coral reef fish......................................................................................... 117 4.2. Shell surfaces for epibionts. ......................................................................... 117 4.3. Hosts for ectoparasites . ......................................................................................... 118 4.4. Hosts for commensals . ......................................................................................... 118 5. Reef-scale contributions of giant clams ................................................................................... 118 5.1. Contributors of carbonate ......................................................................................... 118 5.2. Bioeroders . ......................................................................................... 118 5.3. Topographic enhancement . ......................................................................... 118 5.4. Source of zooxanthellae (Symbiodinium spp.) ......................................................................... 119 5.5. Counteractors of eutrophication. ......................................................................... 120 6. Conclusion . ...................................................................................................... 120 ⇑ Corresponding author. Tel.: +65 65161034. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (M.L. Neo), [email protected] (P.A. Todd). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.004 0006-3207/Ó 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). 112 M.L. Neo et al. / Biological Conservation 181 (2015) 111–123 Acknowledgements . ......................................................................................... 121 Appendix A. Supplementary material . ...................................................................... 121 References . ......................................................................................................... 121 1. Introduction however, stocks are declining rapidly in many countries (bin Othman et al., 2010; Andréfouët et al., 2013) and extirpations are As recently summarized by Bridge et al. (2013, p.528) coral occurring (Kinch and Teitelbaum, 2010; Neo and Todd, 2012, reefs globally are ‘‘suffering death by a thousand cuts’’. Some of 2013). these, including global warming and ocean acidification, are There exists a substantial body of work on the biology and notorious and possibly fatal. Others, such as the loss of particular mariculture of giant clams, but their significance in the coral reef species or genera, are generally less pernicious and do not garner ecosystem is not well understood. Some previous researchers have the same attention. Of course, all reef organisms have a role to play provided anecdotal insights into their likely roles, i.e. as food, as but giant clams (Cardiidae: Tridacninae), by virtue of their sheer shelter, and as reef-builders and shapers. For example, Mercier size (Yonge, 1975), well developed symbiosis with zooxanthellae and Hamel (1996, p.113) remarked: ‘‘Tridacna face many dangers. (Yonge, 1980), and highly threatened status throughout much of They are most vulnerable early in their life cycle, when they are prey their geographic range (Lucas, 1994), perhaps deserve special con- to crabs, lobsters, wrasses, pufferfish, and eagle rays.’’ In a popular sideration. Based on fossil tridacnine taxa, these iconic inverte- science article, Mingoa-Licuanan and Gomez (2002, p.24) com- brates have been associated with corals since the late Eocene mented: ‘‘clam populations add topographic detail to the seabed (Harzhauser et al., 2008) and facies of more recent Tridacna species and serve as nurseries to various organisms... Their calcified shells are common in the upper strata of fossilized reefs (Accordi et al., are excellent substrata for sedentary organisms.’’ Finally, Hutchings 2010; Ono and Clark, 2012). Modern giant clams are only found (1986, p.245) stated: ‘‘giant clams are recognisable in early Holocene in the Indo-West Pacific (Harzhauser et al., 2008) in the area reefs and if similar densities occurred to those on recent reefs, giant bounded by southern Africa, the Red Sea, Japan, Polynesia (exclud- clams have had a considerable ongoing impact on reef morphology.’’ ing New Zealand and Hawaii), and Australia (bin Othman et al., Even though there is evidence that giant clams contribute to the 2010). There are currently 13 extant species of giant clams (see functioning of coral reefs, this has very rarely been quantified. Table 1), including two recently rediscovered: Tridacna noae (Su Cabaitan et al. (2008) represents the only study to experimentally et al., 2014; Borsa et al., 2014) and Tridacna squamosina (previously demonstrate the benefits that giant clams can have on coral reefs. known as T. costata)(Richter et al., 2008), one new species: They showed that, compared to control plots, the presence of clams Tridacna ningaloo (Penny and Willan, 2014), and an undescribed had significantly positive effects on the richness and abundance of cryptic Tridacna sp. (Huelsken et al., 2013). Tridacna maxima is fish species and various invertebrates. Here, based on existing lit- the most widespread, while Hippopus porcellanus, Tridacna mba- erature and our own observations, we examine giant clams as con- lavuana (previously known as T. tevoroa), T. ningaloo, T. noae, Trid- tributors to reef productivity, as providers of biomass to predators acna rosewateri, and T. squamosina have much more restricted and scavengers, and as nurseries and hosts for other organisms. We distributions (Rosewater, 1965; bin Othman et al., 2010; Penny also examine their reef-scale roles as calcium carbonate producers, and Willan, 2014; Su et al., 2014). Tridacna gigas is by far the largest zooxanthellae reservoirs, and counteractors of eutrophication. Our species, reaching shell lengths of over 120 cm and weights in findings lead to the conclusion that healthy populations of giant excess of 200 kg (Rosewater, 1965). Since pre-history, giant clams’ clams benefit coral reefs in ways previously underappreciated, high biomass and
Recommended publications
  • Tugas Biola Tridacna
    OLEH: MARIA ULFAH C551090101 MAYOR ILMU KELAUTAN SEKOLAH PASCASARJANA INSTITUT PERTANIAN BOGOR 2010 EKOLOGI DAN SISTEM REPRODUKSI KERANG KIMA (TRIDACNIDAE) MARIA ULFAH (C5510(C5510901019010190101)))) Ilmu Kelautan, Institut Pertanian Bogor PENDAHULUAN Berbagai jenis flora dan fauna hidup dan berkembang di lautan, baik di permukaan, di kolom dan juga di dasar perairan. Salah satu diantara biota tersebut ada kelompok bivalva yang dikenal dengan kerang raksasa. Disebut kerang raksasa adalah karena pertumbuhan cangkangnya dapat mencapai ukuran yang relatif sangat besar (mencapai 160 cm), kerang tersebut dikenal luas dengan sebutan kima. Kima merupakan makhluk laut tropis yang tersebar luas terutama di wilayah perairan Indo-Pasifik. Kima biasanya ditemukan hidup di daerah terumbu karang dengan sebaran dan ukuran yang berbeda-beda. Kima terdiri dari dua kelompok genus, yaitu Tridacna dan Hippopus . Kelompok Tridacna terdiri dari Tridacna crocea, T. derasa, T. gigas, T. maxima, T. verrucosa, T. rosewater, T. squamosa dan T. tevoroa . Sedangkan kelompok Hippopus terdiri dari Hippopus hippopus dan Hippopus porcellanus . Kima sudah cukup familiar dikalangan masyarakat Indonesia, khususnya masyarakat pesisir atau nelayan. Kima merupakan organisme bentik yang bernilai ekonomi tinggi, memiliki kandungan gizi tinggi dan nilai estetika yang menarik. Permintaan pasar yang tinggi dan harga yang menjanjikan menjadikan kima sangat potensial untuk dikembangkan secara komersil. Perdagangan kima kini lebih mengarah untuk keperluan industry aquarium hias air laut, dengan pertumbuhan mencapai 9% pada tahun 1993-2002 (Cheshire dan Valeriano, 2004). Saat ini permintaan terhadap Kima cukup besar, terutama dari Jepang. Akibat permintaan yang tinggi ini terjadilah eksploitasi berlebihan yang menyebabkan populasi hewan ini menurun. Beberapa spesies kima yang sudah sulit untuk ditemukan adalah Tridacna gigas, Tridacna derasa, Tridacna squamosa , maupun dari genus Hipoppus seperti Hipoppus porcelanus dan Hipoppus hipoppus .
    [Show full text]
  • Microbiomes of Gall-Inducing Copepod Crustaceans from the Corals Stylophora Pistillata (Scleractinia) and Gorgonia Ventalina
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Microbiomes of gall-inducing copepod crustaceans from the corals Stylophora pistillata Received: 26 February 2018 Accepted: 18 July 2018 (Scleractinia) and Gorgonia Published: xx xx xxxx ventalina (Alcyonacea) Pavel V. Shelyakin1,2, Sofya K. Garushyants1,3, Mikhail A. Nikitin4, Sofya V. Mudrova5, Michael Berumen 5, Arjen G. C. L. Speksnijder6, Bert W. Hoeksema6, Diego Fontaneto7, Mikhail S. Gelfand1,3,4,8 & Viatcheslav N. Ivanenko 6,9 Corals harbor complex and diverse microbial communities that strongly impact host ftness and resistance to diseases, but these microbes themselves can be infuenced by stresses, like those caused by the presence of macroscopic symbionts. In addition to directly infuencing the host, symbionts may transmit pathogenic microbial communities. We analyzed two coral gall-forming copepod systems by using 16S rRNA gene metagenomic sequencing: (1) the sea fan Gorgonia ventalina with copepods of the genus Sphaerippe from the Caribbean and (2) the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata with copepods of the genus Spaniomolgus from the Saudi Arabian part of the Red Sea. We show that bacterial communities in these two systems were substantially diferent with Actinobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Betaproteobacteria more prevalent in samples from Gorgonia ventalina, and Gammaproteobacteria in Stylophora pistillata. In Stylophora pistillata, normal coral microbiomes were enriched with the common coral symbiont Endozoicomonas and some unclassifed bacteria, while copepod and gall-tissue microbiomes were highly enriched with the family ME2 (Oceanospirillales) or Rhodobacteraceae. In Gorgonia ventalina, no bacterial group had signifcantly diferent prevalence in the normal coral tissues, copepods, and injured tissues. The total microbiome composition of polyps injured by copepods was diferent.
    [Show full text]
  • Document 561465.Pdf
    MASTER 2 ème année Biologie Géologie Agro-ressources Environnement spécialité Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Développement Durable Parcours Elevage des Pays du Sud, Environnement et Développement Développement de techniques de transport et de réensemencement du bénitier Tridacna maxima pour la filière aquacole en Polynésie française BARROS Thomas Université Montpellier II : Année universitaire 2009/2010 Photo Service de la Pêche Photo PETIT Matthieu Photo PETIT Matthieu Photo Tahiti Eco Clams Résumé : Les bénitiers sont les plus grands mollusques bivalves marins de la région Indopacifique. Ils sont répartis dans des habitats constitués de récifs coralliens peu profonds, dans des eaux comprises entre 25°C et 30°C. La lumière est une ressource indispensable aux bénitiers. Elle permet la photosynthèse des zooxanthelles. Les zooxanthelles sont des algues symbiotiques situées dans le manteau et produisent des éléments nutritifs aux bénitiers. Depuis quelques années, la surpêche pour l’alimentation essentiellement destiné au marché asiatique a entrainé la disparition de certains stocks naturels. C’est pourquoi depuis 1983, les bénitiers toutes espèces confondues, ont été inscrits sur la convention internationale sur le commerce des espèces en danger, au niveau international. Lors de cette étude, nous allons analyser les techniques de transports de bénitiers pour le marché aquacole, au niveau local (transport inter-iles) mais également à plus grande échelle au niveau international afin de permettre de développer l’ouverture de nouvelles zones de productions, en améliorant les taux de survie. Toujours dans cette thématique de gestion de stocks de bénitiers, nous avons aussi réalisé un réensemencement en ile haute afin d’étudier la faisabilité et la viabilité de projets de repeuplement sur le long terme.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Selected Species Subject to Long- Standing Import Suspensions
    UNEP-WCMC technical report Review of selected species subject to long- standing import suspensions Part II: Asia and Oceania (Version edited for public release) Review of selected species subject to long-standing import suspensions. Part II: Asia and Oceania Prepared for The European Commission, Directorate General Environment, Directorate E - Global & Regional Challenges, LIFE ENV.E.2. – Global Sustainability, Trade & Multilateral Agreements, Brussels, Belgium Prepared February 2016 Copyright European Commission 2016 Citation UNEP-WCMC. 2016. Review of selected species subject to long-standing import suspensions. Part II: Asia and Oceania. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) is the specialist biodiversity assessment of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organization. The Centre has been in operation for over 30 years, combining scientific research with policy advice and the development of decision tools. We are able to provide objective, scientifically rigorous products and services to help decision- makers recognize the value of biodiversity and apply this knowledge to all that they do. To do this, we collate and verify data on biodiversity and ecosystem services that we analyze and interpret in comprehensive assessments, making the results available in appropriate forms for national and international level decision-makers and businesses. To ensure that our work is both sustainable and equitable we seek to build the capacity of partners
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 10 MOLLUSCS 10.1 a Significant Space A
    PART file:///C:/DOCUME~1/ROBERT~1/Desktop/Z1010F~1/FINALS~1.HTM CHAPTER 10 MOLLUSCS 10.1 A Significant Space A. Evolved a fluid-filled space within the mesoderm, the coelom B. Efficient hydrostatic skeleton; room for networks of blood vessels, the alimentary canal, and associated organs. 10.2 Characteristics A. Phylum Mollusca 1. Contains nearly 75,000 living species and 35,000 fossil species. 2. They have a soft body. 3. They include chitons, tooth shells, snails, slugs, nudibranchs, sea butterflies, clams, mussels, oysters, squids, octopuses and nautiluses (Figure 10.1A-E). 4. Some may weigh 450 kg and some grow to 18 m long, but 80% are under 5 centimeters in size. 5. Shell collecting is a popular pastime. 6. Classes: Gastropoda (snails…), Bivalvia (clams, oysters…), Polyplacophora (chitons), Cephalopoda (squids, nautiluses, octopuses), Monoplacophora, Scaphopoda, Caudofoveata, and Solenogastres. B. Ecological Relationships 1. Molluscs are found from the tropics to the polar seas. 2. Most live in the sea as bottom feeders, burrowers, borers, grazers, carnivores, predators and filter feeders. 1. Fossil evidence indicates molluscs evolved in the sea; most have remained marine. 2. Some bivalves and gastropods moved to brackish and fresh water. 3. Only snails (gastropods) have successfully invaded the land; they are limited to moist, sheltered habitats with calcium in the soil. C. Economic Importance 1. Culturing of pearls and pearl buttons is an important industry. 2. Burrowing shipworms destroy wooden ships and wharves. 3. Snails and slugs are garden pests; some snails are intermediate hosts for parasites. D. Position in Animal Kingdom (see Inset, page 172) E.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Traits of Engineered Coral Entities to Be Employed in Reef Restoration
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Exploring Traits of Engineered Coral Entities to be Employed in Reef Restoration Dor Shefy 1,2,3,*, Nadav Shashar 2 and Baruch Rinkevich 1 1 Israel Oceanography and Limnological Research, National Institute of Oceanography, Tel-Shikmona, P.O. Box 8030, Haifa 31080, Israel; [email protected] 2 Marine Biology and Biotechnology Program, Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Eilat Campus, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel; [email protected] 3 The Interuniversity Institute for Marine Science, Eilat 88000, Israel * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 18 November 2020; Accepted: 13 December 2020; Published: 21 December 2020 Abstract: Aggregated settlement of coral larvae results in a complex array of compatible (chimerism) and incompatible (rejection) allogenic responses. Each chimeric assemblage is considered as a distinct biological entity, subjected to selection, however, the literature lacks the evolutionary and ecological functions assigned to these units of selection. Here, we examined the effects of creating chimera/rejecting partners in terms of growth and survival under prolonged field conditions. Bi/multichimeras, bi/multi-rejecting entities, and genetically homogenous colonies (GHC) of the coral Stylophora pistillata were monitored under prolonged field conditions in a mid-water floating nursery in the northern Red Sea. Results revealed an increased aerial size and aeroxial ecological volume for rejected and chimeric entities compared to GHCs. At age 18 months, there were no significant differences in these parameters among the entities and traits, and rejecting partners did not differ from GHC. However, survival probabilities were significantly higher for chimeras that further revealed disparate initiation of up-growing branches and high diversity of chimeric phenotypes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reproduction of the Red Sea Coral Stylophora Pistillata
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 1, 133-144, 1979 - Published September 30 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. The Reproduction of the Red Sea Coral Stylophora pistillata. I. Gonads and Planulae B. Rinkevich and Y.Loya Department of Zoology. The George S. Wise Center for Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University. Tel Aviv. Israel ABSTRACT: The reproduction of Stylophora pistillata, one of the most abundant coral species in the Gulf of Eilat, Red Sea, was studied over more than two years. Gonads were regularly examined using histological sections and the planula-larvae were collected in situ with plankton nets. S. pistillata is an hermaphroditic species. Ovaries and testes are situated in the same polyp, scattered between and beneath the septa and attached to them by stalks. Egg development starts in July preceding the spermaria, which start to develop only in October. A description is given on the male and female gonads, their structure and developmental processes. During oogenesis most of the oocytes are absorbed and usually only one oocyte remains in each gonad. S. pistillata broods its eggs to the planula stage. Planulae are shed after sunset and during the night. After spawning, the planula swims actively and changes its shape frequently. A mature planula larva of S. pistillata has 6 pairs of complete mesenteries (Halcampoides stage). However, a wide variability in developmental stages exists in newly shed planulae. The oral pole of the planula shows green fluorescence. Unique organs ('filaments' and 'nodules') are found on the surface of the planula;
    [Show full text]
  • ENCORE: the Eаect of Nutrient Enrichment on Coral Reefs
    Marine Pollution Bulletin Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 91±120, 2001 Ó 2001 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. Printed in Great Britain PII: S0025-326X$00)00181-8 0025-326X/01 $ - see front matter ENCORE: The Eect of Nutrient Enrichment on Coral Reefs. Synthesis of Results and Conclusions K. KOOP *,1, D. BOOTHà, A. BROADBENT§,2, J. BRODIE , D. BUCHERàà, D. CAPONE ,3, J. COLL§§,4, W. DENNISON , M. ERDMANNààà, P. HARRISONàà, O. HOEGH-GULDBERG ,5, P. HUTCHINGS§§§, G. B. JONES§, A. W. D. LARKUM , J. O'NEIL ,5, A. STEVEN ,6, E. TENTORI§§, S. WARDàà,5, J. WILLIAMSON ,7 and D. YELLOWLEESàààà School of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia àDepartment Environmental Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney NSW 2065 Australia §Department of Chemistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, P.O. Box 1379, Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia ààCentre for Coastal Management, Southern Cross University, P.O. Box 157, Lismore NSW 2480, Australia §§Department of Biology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia Department of Botany, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia àààP.O. Box 1020, Manado, Sulawesi, Indonesia §§§The Australian Museum, 6, College Street, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland, Box 38, Solomons, MA 20688-0038, USA ààààBiochemistry and Molecular Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811 Australia Coral reef degradation resulting from nutrient enrichment assessed a variety of factors focusing on nutrient dynamics of coastal waters is of increasing global concern. Although and biotic responses. A controlled and replicated experi- eects of nutrients on coral reef organisms have been ment was conducted over two years using twelve small demonstrated in the laboratory,there is little direct evi- patch reefs ponded at low tide by a coral rim.
    [Show full text]
  • Tridacna Maxima (Reding), and Hippopus Hippopus (Linnaeus)!
    Pacific Science (1976), Vol. 30, No.3, p. 219-233 Printed in Great Britain Early Life History of the Giant Clams Tridacna crocea Lamarck, Tridacna maxima (Reding), and Hippopus hippopus (Linnaeus)! STEPHEN C. JAMESON2 ABST RACT: Giant clams may be stimulated to spawn by the addition of macer­ ated gonads to the water.Individuals of Tridacna maxima collected at Anae Island, Guam, spawned from N ovember to March. On Palau, Hippopus hippopus spawned in June and Tridacna crocea, in July. Tridacna crocea, T. maxima, and H. hippopus displayed a stereotype d develop ment pattern in morphogenesis and rate of development . Fertilized eggs of T. crocea, T . maxima, and H. hippopus had mean diameters of 93.1, 104.5, and 130.0 psx», respectively . The day-2 straight-hinge veligers of T . crocea, T . maxima, and H. hippopus had mean shell lengths of 155.0, 168.0, and 174.4 pm, respec tively. Settlement occurred 12, 11, and 9 days after fertili zation at a mean shell length of 168.0, 195.0, and 202.0 pm for T . crocea,T . max ima, and H. bippopss, respectively. Metamorphosis was basically complete about 1 day after settlement. Juveniles of T . crocea, T. max ima, and H. hippopus first acqui re zooxanthellae after 19, 21, and 25 days, respectively. Growth rates increase sharply after the acquisition of zoo ­ xanthellae. Juvenile shells show first signs of becoming opaque after 47 days for T . maxima and after 50 days for H. hippopus. G rANT CLAMS are protandric fun ctional herma­ formation, and initial organogenesis. The larval phrodites (Wada 1942, 1952).
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Boring Bivalve Mollusks from Isla Margarita, Venezuela
    ISSN 0738-9388 247 Volume: 49 THE FESTIVUS ISSUE 3 Marine boring bivalve mollusks from Isla Margarita, Venezuela Marcel Velásquez 1 1 Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Universites, 43 Rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris, France; [email protected] Paul Valentich-Scott 2 2 Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California, 93105, USA; [email protected] Juan Carlos Capelo 3 3 Estación de Investigaciones Marinas de Margarita. Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales. Apartado 144 Porlama,. Isla de Margarita, Venezuela. ABSTRACT Marine endolithic and wood-boring bivalve mollusks living in rocks, corals, wood, and shells were surveyed on the Caribbean coast of Venezuela at Isla Margarita between 2004 and 2008. These surveys were supplemented with boring mollusk data from malacological collections in Venezuelan museums. A total of 571 individuals, corresponding to 3 orders, 4 families, 15 genera, and 20 species were identified and analyzed. The species with the widest distribution were: Leiosolenus aristatus which was found in 14 of the 24 localities, followed by Leiosolenus bisulcatus and Choristodon robustus, found in eight and six localities, respectively. The remaining species had low densities in the region, being collected in only one to four of the localities sampled. The total number of species reported here represents 68% of the boring mollusks that have been documented in Venezuelan coastal waters. This study represents the first work focused exclusively on the examination of the cryptofaunal mollusks of Isla Margarita, Venezuela. KEY WORDS Shipworms, cryptofauna, Teredinidae, Pholadidae, Gastrochaenidae, Mytilidae, Petricolidae, Margarita Island, Isla Margarita Venezuela, boring bivalves, endolithic. INTRODUCTION The lithophagans (Mytilidae) are among the Bivalve mollusks from a range of families have more recognized boring mollusks.
    [Show full text]
  • Farming the Giant Clam
    Farming the giant clam Item Type article Authors Surtida, Marilyn B.; Buendia, Romeo Y. Download date 24/09/2021 10:40:27 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/35020 Farming the giant clam By MB Surtida and RY Buendia Aquaculture and enhancing stock density along reef coasts: hitting two birds with one stone. That’s what the culture of giant clam promises. The Philippines is home to seven giant clam spe- cies (Tridacna gigas, T. derasa, T. squamosa, T. croces, T. maxima, Hippopus hippopus and H. porcellanus). In 1983, T. gigas and T. derasa were included in the list of endangered species during the convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) to regulate its commercial trade. In 1985, all the other species of giant clams were included in the list (the so-called Apppendix II) to eliminate problems in identifying giant clam deriva- tives of the different species. As signatory to the con- vention, the Philippines has banned the exportation of all giant clams. The Fisheries Statistics of the Philippines has re- ported harvests of giant clams to be 243 tons in 1976, 11,930 tons in 1980, 7 tons in 1983, and 68 tons in The breeding tank at Silliman University (SU) contains breeders of two species. Drs. Hilconida Calumpong, Director, and Janet 1984. This decline has been attested to by Dr. Hilconida Estacion, Assistant Director of the SU Marine Laboratory with Calumpong, Director of the Silliman University Marine Labora- Ms. Agnes Apao and Mrs. Jacinta Lucanas, both study leaders, tory (SUML) in Dumaguete City when she said that when she explain the breeding habits of the giant clams being studied was in Cuyo Island in 1978, she could walk on wide areas of giant clams in the intertidal areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Benthic Habitats and Biodiversity of Dampier and Montebello Marine
    CSIRO OCEANS & ATMOSPHERE Benthic habitats and biodiversity of the Dampier and Montebello Australian Marine Parks Edited by: John Keesing, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Research March 2019 ISBN 978-1-4863-1225-2 Print 978-1-4863-1226-9 On-line Contributors The following people contributed to this study. Affiliation is CSIRO unless otherwise stated. WAM = Western Australia Museum, MV = Museum of Victoria, DPIRD = Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Study design and operational execution: John Keesing, Nick Mortimer, Stephen Newman (DPIRD), Roland Pitcher, Keith Sainsbury (SainsSolutions), Joanna Strzelecki, Corey Wakefield (DPIRD), John Wakeford (Fishing Untangled), Alan Williams Field work: Belinda Alvarez, Dion Boddington (DPIRD), Monika Bryce, Susan Cheers, Brett Chrisafulli (DPIRD), Frances Cooke, Frank Coman, Christopher Dowling (DPIRD), Gary Fry, Cristiano Giordani (Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia), Alastair Graham, Mark Green, Qingxi Han (Ningbo University, China), John Keesing, Peter Karuso (Macquarie University), Matt Lansdell, Maylene Loo, Hector Lozano‐Montes, Huabin Mao (Chinese Academy of Sciences), Margaret Miller, Nick Mortimer, James McLaughlin, Amy Nau, Kate Naughton (MV), Tracee Nguyen, Camilla Novaglio, John Pogonoski, Keith Sainsbury (SainsSolutions), Craig Skepper (DPIRD), Joanna Strzelecki, Tonya Van Der Velde, Alan Williams Taxonomy and contributions to Chapter 4: Belinda Alvarez, Sharon Appleyard, Monika Bryce, Alastair Graham, Qingxi Han (Ningbo University, China), Glad Hansen (WAM),
    [Show full text]