DOCSLIB.ORG

Mosses of Pakistan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

J Hattori Bot. Lab. No. 93: 273- 291 (Jan. 2003) MOSSES OF PAKISTAN 1 2 MASANOBU HIGUCHI AND NAOKl NISHIMURA ABSTRACT. The mosses of Pakistan are enumerated by the literature published up to 2001. The moss flora of Pakistan comprises 339 taxa in 124 genera and 33 families. The southern and southwestern Pakistan (Sindh and Balochistan) has not been bryologically well explored. The mosses of Pakistan are largely circumboreal, although the Eurasian element is also prominent. It has 43 endemic taxa (ca. 13%) and a rich representation of the family Pottiaceae including 23 genera and 63 species. The floristic relationships of mosses between Pakistan and the neighboring areas are discussed. KEy WORDs: mosses, distribution, Pakistan, East India, Afghanistan INTRODUCTION Pakistan stretches from the Arabian Sea in the West to the high mountains of central Asia, and geographically falls into three main regions: (I) northern mountainous region, (2) Balochistan plateau region, and (3) Punjab and Sindh plain region. The average rainfall varies from less than 75 mm a year to 1650 mm and, beginning at sea level, the country rises to 7063 m at K-2 in the Karakorum Mts. (Stewart 1982). Pakistan is divided into four provinces: Sindh, Balochistan, Punjab, and the North-West Frontier Province (usually re­ ferred to as N. W F. P.) (Fig. 1). There are two other regions, Baltistan (or the Northern Areas) and Azad Kashmir. The moss flora of Pakistan is still insufficiently known. Early bryological researches of Pakistan were made by Brotherus (1898a, b), Dixon (1926,1929) and Herzog (1938). In the 1950's, some local floras were published by Stoermer (1954), Bartram (1955) and Noguchi (1956, 1959, 1964). The first list of Pakistan mosses was presented by Asghar in 1957. Subsequently several authors have contributed additions to the moss flora of Pakistan such as Froehlich (1964), Robinson (1965), Karczmarz (1980), Higuchi (1992), Nishimura et a1. (1993a, b), Townsend (1993, 1994), and Nishimura & Higuchi (2001). The main floristic studies of the mosses in Pakistan are compiled in Table 1. The moss flora of south­ ern and southwestern Pakistan (Sindh and Balochistan) is almost unknown, except for Nishimura & Higuchi (2001). This article aims to synthesize present knowledge of the moss flora of Pakistan and to discuss its characteristics and affinity. Moss FLORA OF PAKISTAN The moss flora of Pakistan has been compiled by Asghar (1957) and Nishimura & 1 Department of Botany, National Science Museum, 4-1- 1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki-ken 305-0005, Japan. 2 Hiruzen Branch, Botanical Garden, Okayama University of Science, Kawakami-son, Maniwa­ gun, Okayama-ken 717-0602, Japan. 274 1. Hattori Bot. Lab. No. 93 200 3 I PAKISTAN I AFGHANISTAN Balochistan i I INDIA \ , i 100, 200, km Fig. l. Outline map of Pakistan. Higuchi (1993) who enumerated 136 taxa in 67 genera and 23 families and 324 taxa in 121 genera and 32 families respectively. Subsequently floristic studies were made by Townsend (1993,1994) and Nishimura & Higuchi (2001). The updated moss flora of Pakistan com­ prises 339 taxa (307 species and 32 infraspecific taxa) in 124 genera and 33 families. In the number of species, the largest family is Pottiaceae (63 spp.), and the next is Bryaceae (34 spp.) FLORISTIC COMPOSITION OF THE Moss FLORA OF PAKISTAN The floristic elements of the moss flora of Pakistan are shown on Table 2. The moss flora of Pakistan is largely circumboreal (ca. 45%), although the Eurasian element is also prominent (ca. 32%). The Eurasian element (l08 taxa) is divided into six sub-elements: (1) endemic to Pakistan (43 taxa), (2) East Asian (30 taxa), (3) European- Pakistan (13 taxa), (4) Himalayan (11 taxa), (5) Eurasian (6 taxa), and (6) Indian (5 taxa). At present 43 taxa can be recognized as endemic taxa to Pakistan, accounting for ca. 13% endemism. The per­ centage of endemic taxa is rather high, since that of Vietnam (showing the highest percent­ age of endemic taxa in the Indochinese countries) is ca. 7% (Tan & Iwatsuki 1993). Revi­ sionary studies are needed for these endemic taxa. Probably the high endemism in Pakistan will be reduced. M. HIGUCHI & N . NISHIMURA: Mosses of Pakistan 275 Table 1. Floristic studies of the mosses in Pakistan. Author(s) Collector( s) and year( s) Area(s) Brotherus (1898a) 1. F. Duthie, 1892-93, etc. N. W Himalaya Brotherus (1898b) Surg.-Lt. Harriss, 1895 Chitral Relief Mathur (1925) S. R. Kashyap, 1922 Lahore Dixon (1926) 1. Garrett & W Lillie, 1924 Gilgit, etc. Dixon (1929) J. Femandez, 1927 Waziristan Blatter & Femandez (1931)1 E. Blatter, 1. Femandez, 1927, 1930 Waziristan Herzog (1938) Deutschen Hindukush Expedition, 1935 Hindukush Dixon (1942) R. R. Stewart, 1922-32, etc. N.W Himalaya Stoermer (1954) P. Wendelbo, F. Joerstad, 1950 Chitral Bartram (1955) R. R. Stewart, 1933-46 N.W Himalaya Noguchi (1956) S. Ahmad, 1952- 54 Changla Gali, etc. Asghar (1957) (Herb. Panjab Univ.) Lahore, etc. Noguchi (1959) S. Ahmad et aI., 1952- 56 Changla Gali, etc. Noguchi (1964) F. Schmid, 1953-54 N.WF.P. , etc. Froehlich (1964) K. H. Rechinger, 1962 Swat, etc. Robinson (1965) G. L. Webster, E. Nasir, 1955 Baltistan, etc. Karczmarz (1980) K. Karczmarz, 1974 Kashmir Higuchi (1992) M. Higuchi, 1990 Swat, Kaghan, etc. Nishimura et al. (1993a, b) N. Nishimura, 1991 Azad Kashmir, etc. Townsend (1993) C. C. Townsend, 1973 Rawalpindi District Townsend (1994) U. Schickhoff, 1990 Kaghan Nishimura & Higuchi (2001) T. Nakaike, 1992 Baltistan, Sindh, etc. 1 Determined by H. N. Dixon. Table 2. Floristic element of mosses of Pakistan. Floristic element Number of taxa Percentage (%) Circumboreal 152 44.8% Eurasian 108 31.9% Cosmopolitan 43 12.7% Palaeotropical 23 6.8% East Asian-N.American 9 2.6% Pantropical 4 1.2% Total 339 100% FLORISTIC RELATIONSHIPS OF MOSSES OF PAKISTAN The moss flora of Pakistan was compared with those of East India (1042 taxa, Appen- dix. 1.) and Afghanistan (211 taxa, Appendix 2.) based on Gangulee (1969-1980) and Frey 276 1. Hattori Bot. Lab. No. 93 200 3 & Kiirschner (1991). The moss flora of East India is evidently richer than that of Pakistan. As compared with that of East India, Pakistan lacks several groups such as Sphagnaceae, Andreaeaceae, Leucobryaceae, Calymperaceae, and almost all members of Leucodontales and Hookeriales. It is notable that these groups are usually rare in limestone areas as well as in dry habitats. On the other hand, the moss flora of Afghanistan is poorer than that of Pakistan. All families recorded in Afghanistan are recognized in Pakistan except for the Fontinalaceae. Comparatively the moss flora of Pakistan is more similar to that of Afghanistan than that of East India. A total of 92 taxa are common to Pakistan and Afghanistan, which is ca. 27% of the Pakistani and ca. 44% of the Afghanistan moss floras. In Pakistan there remain areas in almost every district that have not been visited in the search for bryophytes. Much more thorough collecting and revisionary studies need to be done. AN ENUMERATION OF THE MOSSES OF PAKISTAN BUXBAUMIACEAE Buxbaumia minakatae S.Okamura (Higuchi 1992) DIPHYSCIACEAE Theriotia kashmirensis H.Rob. (Robinson 1965 as sp. nov.; Deguchi 1984) T. lorifolia Cardot (Robinson 1965) POLYTRICHACEAE Atrichum obtusulum (MiilI.Hal.) A.Jaeger (Noguchi, 1956, 1959) A. subserratum (Harv.) Mitt. (Nishimura & Higuchi 2001) A. undulatum (Hedw.) P.Beauv. (Noguchi 1956; Karczmarz 1980; Nishimura et al. 1993a) A. undulatum var. gracilisetum Besch. (Noguchi 1956, 1959, 1964, all as Atrichum undulatum var. haussknechtii) Pogonatum urnigerum (Hedw.) P.Beauv. (Nishimura et al. 1993a; Townsend 1994) Polytrichastrum alpinum (Hedw.) G.L.Sm. (Noguchi 1956; Karczmarz 1980, both as Polytrichum alpinum) Polytrichum juniperinum Hedw. (Brotherus 1898b; Dixon 1926; Stoermer 1954; Bartram 1955; Noguchi 1956, 1964; Robinson 1965; Nishimura et al. 1993a; Townsend 1994) P. xanthopilum Wilson ex Mitt. (Nishimura et al. 1993a) FISSIDENTACEAE Fissidens brevidorsus Dixon (Dixon 1942 as sp. nov.) F. bryoides Hedw. (Bartram 1955; Karczmarz 1980; Townsend 1994) F. bryoides Hedw. var. schmidii (MiilI.Hal.) R.S.Chopra & S.S.Kumar (Stoermer 1954 as Fissidens schmidii; Higuchi 1992; Nishimura et al. 1993a; Townsend 1993) F. chitralensis P'de la Varde (Stoermer 1954 as sp. nov.) F. curvato-involutus Dixon (Nishimura et al. 1993a) F. diversifolius Mitt. (Asghar 1957; Nishimura et al. 1993a; Townsend 1993) F. dubius P.Beauv. (Noguchi 1964 as Fissidens cristatus; Nishimura et al. 1993a) F. grandifrons Brid. (Dixon 1926, 1929; Blatter & Femandez 1931; Noguchi 1956, 1959, 1964; Froehlich 1964; Higuchi 1992; Nishimura et al. 1993a) M. HIGUCHI & N . NISHIMURA: Mosses of Pakistan 277 F gymnogynus Mitt. (Townsend 1993) F. involutus Wilson ex Mitt. (Dixon 1929; Blatter & Fernandez 1931) F. perplexans Dixon (Dixon 1926 as sp. nov.) F. strictulus Mull.Ha!. (Higuchi 1992; Nishimura et a!. 1993a) F. taxifolius Hedw. (Karczmarz 1980; Higuchi 1992; Nishimura et a!. 1993a; Townsend 1993) DITRlCHACEAE Ceratodon purpureus (Hedw.) Brid. (Townsend 1994) C. purpureus fo. densus (Breidl.) Podp. (Stoermer 1954 as Ceratodon purpureus var. densus) Distichium capillaceum (Hedw.) Bruch & Schimp. (Brotherus 1898b; Dixon 1926; Stoermer 1954; Robinson 1965; Higuchi 1992; Nishimura et a!. 1993a; Townsend 1994) D. capillaceum var. compactum (Huebener) Dixon (Stoermer 1954) D. inclinatum (Hedw.) Bruch & Schimp. (Stoermer 1954; Bartram 1955; Higuchi 1992) Ditrichum crispatissimum (Mull.Ha!.) Paris (Higuchi 1992) Saelania glaucescens (Hedw.) Broth. (Brotherus 1898b as Ditrichum glaucescens; Nishimura et a!. 1993a) SELIGERIACEAE Blindiaperminuta Nog. (Noguchi 1956 as sp. nov.) DICRANACEAE Brothera leana (Sull.) Miil!.Ha!. (Noguchi 1959; Nishimura et a!. 1993a) Dichodontium pellucidum (Hedw.) Schimp. (Noguchi 1956) Diranella howei Renau1d & Cardot (Townsend 1993) D. mollicula (Mitt.) A.Jaeger (Karczmarz 1980 as Anisothecium molliculum) D. varia (Hedw.) Schimp. (Bartram 1955; Noguchi 1956 as Dicranella rubra; Higuchi, 1992; Townsend 1993) D. varia var. tenuifolia (Bruch & Schimp.) Schimp. (Froehlich 1964 as Anisothecium tenuifolium) Dicranoweisia cirrata (Hedw.) Lindb. (Brotherus 1898b; Noguchi 1959; Robinson, 1965) Dicranum kashmirense Broth.
Recommended publications
  • Türkiye'deki Campyliadelphus Elodes Lindb. Kanda Amblystegiaceae

    Türkiye'deki Campyliadelphus Elodes Lindb. Kanda Amblystegiaceae

    www.biodicon.com Biological Diversity and Conservation ISSN 1308-8084 Online; ISSN 1308-5301 Print 6/2 (2013) 118-122 Research note/Araştırma notu Notes on Campyliadelphus elodes (Lindb.) Kanda (Amblystegiaceae) in Turkey Nevzat BATAN 1, Turan ÖZDEMIR *1 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080, Trabzon, Turkey Abstract Campyliadelphus elodes (Lindb.) Kanda was firstly reported from Western Black Sea region (Düzce province) of Turkey by Ezer and Cangül in 2010. Presently, this species has been reported for the first time from East Black Sea region (Artvin province) of Turkey and A5 square with this paper. Description of the specimen was given along with its ecology and collected localities. Key words: Moss flora, biodiversity, Campyliadelphus, Amblystegiaceae, Turkey ---------- ---------- Türkiye’deki Campyliadelphus elodes (Lindb.) Kanda (Amblystegiaceae) üzerine notlar Özet Campyliadelphus elodes (Lindb.) Kanda ilk kez 2010 yılında Ezer ve Cangül tarafından Türkiye’nin Batı Karadeniz (Düzce ili) Bölgesi’nden rapor edildi. Şimdi, bu çalışma ile, ikinci kez Türkiye’nin Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi’nden (Artvin ili) ve A5 karesinden rapor edilmektedir. Türün ayrıntılı tanımlaması ile birlikte onun ekolojisi ve toplandığı lokaliteler verildi. Anahtar kelimeler: Karayosunu florası, biyolojik çeşitlilik, Campyliadelphus, Amblystegiaceae, Türkiye 1. Introduction Compared to other countries, not many bryophytes studies have been conducted in Turkey, so the bryophyte flora of Turkey remains poorly known.
  • Dry Grassland Communities of Shallow, Skeletal Soils

    Dry Grassland Communities of Shallow, Skeletal Soils

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Tuexenia - Mitteilungen der Floristisch- soziologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Jahr/Year: 2006 Band/Volume: NS_26 Autor(en)/Author(s): Dengler Jürgen, Löbel Swantje, Boch Steffen Artikel/Article: Dry grassland communities of shallow, skeletal soils (Sedo-Scleranthenea) in northern Europe 159-190 ©Floristisch-soziologische Arbeitsgemeinschft; www.tuexenia.de; download unter www.zobodat.at Tuexenia 2 6:15 9-190 . Göttingen 2006. Dry grassland communities of shallow, skeletal soils (Sedo-Scleranthenea) in northern Europe -Jürgen Dengler, Swantje Löbel and Steffen Boch - Abstract We studied the dry grasslands of shallow, skeletal soils ( Sedo-Scleranthenea , Koelerio-Corynephore- tea) in northern Europe, based on a combination of new relevés from southern Oland (Sweden, n = 182) and Saaremaa (Estonia, n = 73) as well as a comprehensive evaluation of literature data, of which 65 suit­ able relevés were directly included in our analyses. Apart from a few vague indications of acidophytic Sedo-Scleranthenea communities (order Sedo-Scleranthetalia), all data refer to basiphytic communities (.Alysso-Sedetalia ); our analyses are thus focussed on the latter. The Nordic Alysso-Sedetalia communi­ ties proved to be quite different from their temperate counterparts and thus are included in a separate alliance, Tortello tortuosae-Sedion albi, which forms the northern counterpart to the central European Alysso-Sedion. Within the northern alliance, we distinguish two suballiances. The more widespread cen­ tral suballiance Tortello tortuosae-Sedenion albi inhabits different types of base-rich substrata in both natural and anthropogenic sites, and is comprised of the Cladonio symphicarpiae-Sedetum albi and the Ditricho flexicaulis-Sedetum acris.
  • Slīteres Nacionālā Parka Sūnu Sugu Saraksts

    Slīteres Nacionālā Parka Sūnu Sugu Saraksts

    Slīteres nacionālā parka sūnu sugu saraksts 2. tabula Taksonu nosaukumi lapu sūnām pēc Hill et al. (2006), aknu sūnām pēc Grolle & Long (2000), latviskie nosaukumi pēc A. Āboliņas (2001). Apzīmējumi: ar krāsu iezīmētas sugas, kas iekļautas ceļvedī; A - Latvijā īpaši aizsargājamas sugas (MK noteikumi Nr. 396, 2000; ar grozījumiem MK noteikumos Nr. 627, 2004); SNP sūnu saraksts D - DMB indikatorsugas un speciālas biotopu sugas (Ek u.c., 2002); M - Mikrolieguma sugas (MK noteikumi Nr. 45, 2001; ar grozījumiem MK notei- kumos Nr. 378, 2005); S - Latvijas Sarkanās grāmatas sugas (Āboliņa, 1994). DZIMTA / sugas nosaukums latīniski sugas nosaukums latviski nosaukuma sinonīms BRYOPSIDA lapu sūnu klase AMBLYSTEGIACEAE Kindb. Amblystegium serpens (Hedw.) Schimp. ložņu strupknābe Amblystegium juratzkanum Schimp. Amblystegium subtile (Hedw.) Schimp. smalkā strupknābe Platydictya subtilis (Hedw.) H.A.Crum Campyliadelphus chrysophyllus (Brid.) R. S. zeltainā atskabardze Campylium chrysophyllum 112 Chopra (Brid.) Lange Campyliadelphus elodes (Lindb.) Kanda purva atskabardze Campylium elodes (Lindb.) Kindb. Campylium stellatum (Hedw.) Lange & starainā atskabardze Campyliadelphus stellatus C.E.O.Jensen (Hedw.) Kanda Cratoneuron filicinum (Hedw.) Spruce paparžu dzīslenīte Drepanocladus aduncus (Hedw.) Warnst. mīkstā sirpjlape Drepanocladus polycarpos (Blandow ex Voit) Warnst. Drepanocladus polygamus (Schimp.) daudzmāju atskabardze Campylium polyga- Hedenäs mum (Schimp.) Lange & C.E.O.Jensen Drepanocladus sendtneri (Schimp. ex Zentnera sirpjlape H.Müll.)

  • Mires from Pole to Pole

    THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT 38 | 2012 NATURE Mires from pole to pole Tapio Lindholm and Raimo Heikkilä (eds.) Finnish Environment Institute THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT 38 | 2012 Mires from pole to pole Tapio Lindholm and Raimo Heikkilä (eds.) Helsinki 2012 FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE THE FINNISH ENVIRONMENT 38 | 2012 The Finnish Environment Institute Natural Environment Centre Layout: Pirjo Appelgren Cover: Tapio Lindholm, Olvassuo mire This publication is also available on the Internet at www.environment.fi/syke/publications Edita Prima Oy, Helsinki 2013 ONM IR EN NV T E A L IC L ISBN 978-952-11-4106-5 (pbk) A D B R E O L ISBN 978-952-11-4107-2 (PDF) N ISBN 978 -952-11- 4113 -3 (CD) ISSN 1238-7312 (print) 441 002 ISSN 1796-1637 (online) PEFC/02-31-135 Printed matter CONTENTS Towards the understanding of the variety of mires and their conservation in different countries ............................................................ 7 Tapio Lindholm and Raimo Heikkilä Patterns in polygon mires in north-eastern Yakutia, Siberia: The Role of Vegetation and Water ...........................................................19 Norman Donner, Merten Minke, Pim de Klerk, Roman Sofronov and Hans Joosten Mires on the map of Russia ........................................................................ 31 Tatiana Yurkovskaya Development of large-scale aapa mire hydrotopography on land-uplift coastland in northern Finland ................................................39 Sakari Rehell, Antti Huttunen†, Hanna Kondelin and Jarmo Laitinen The development of
  • SY 560 (2.Painos).Pdf

    SY 560 (2.Painos).Pdf

    560 Sisältö Esipuhe .............................................................................................3 OSA I ...............................................................................................7 1 Johdanto ................................................................................. 9 1.1 Sammalet ovat mielenkiintoinen eliöryhmä .............................................. 9 1.2 Suomen sammalten levinneisyyden tuntemus......................................... 12 1.3 Sammaltietojen kokoaminen........................................................................ 16 2 Sammalten ekologiaa ...........................................................22 2.1 Sammalten elämänkierto, lisääntyminen ja levintä ................................ 22 2.2 Sammalten levinneisyys ................................................................................ 25 2.3 Sammalten elinympäristöt ja esimerkkejä uhanalaisista lajeista ........ 37 2.3.1 Metsät................................................................................................................. 37 Kangasmetsät ................................................................................................... 40 Kantopaanusammal (Calypogeia suecica) ................................................... 41 Haapariippusammal (Neckera pennata) ...................................................... 43 Lehtometsät ...................................................................................................... 44 Idänlehväsammal (Plagiomnium drummondii) ........................................
  • Newsletter of the Swiss Association of Bryology and Lichenology N° 28

    Newsletter of the Swiss Association of Bryology and Lichenology N° 28

    MeylaniaNewsletter of the Swiss Association of Bryology and Lichenology N° 28 Zeitschrift der Schweizerischen Vereinigung für Bryologie und Lichenologie Journal de l’Association Suisse de Bryologie et Lichénologie Meylania ist die Zeitschrift der Schweizeris- chen Vereinigung für Bryologie und Licheno- logie und erscheint zweimal jährlich zu Beginn der Monate April und November. Die Heraus- gabe der Zeitschrift wird unterstützt von der Schweizerischen Akademie der Naturwissen- schaften SANW. Die Autoren-Beiträge werden nicht referiert. Die in der Zeitschrift vertre- tenen Meinungen müssen nicht mit jener der Bryolich übereinstimmen. Die Mitgliedschaft bei der Bryolich steht allen Interessierten im In- Und Ausland offen. Der Jahresbeitrag beträgt Fr. 30.- (CHF) (20 Euro) ; für Studentinnen und Studenten Fr. 15.-. Der Einzahlungsschein wird jeweils der Aprilausgabe der Meylania beigelegt. Mitgliederbeiträge aus dem Ausland sollten auf das Postcheck-Konto der SVBL in Bern, Nr. 30-36350-7, oder bar in einem Umschlag am den Kassier überwiesen werden. Hinweis für Autoren Beiträge müssen in definitiver Form bis Ende Januar bzw. Ende August bei der Redaktion eintreffen. Wissenschaftliche Beiträge werden nicht begutachtet, die Verantwortung (für Inhalt, Sprache und Stil) liegt beim Verfasser bzw. bei der Verfasserin. Für die Präsentation gelten keine bestimmten Regeln. Die Beiträge sollten in der Regel 6 Seiten nicht überschreiten, längere Artikel sind mit der Redaktion abzusprechen. Erwünscht sind Manuskripte auf Diskette oder als E-Mail (Text- oder MS Word-Dokumente), plus ein Ausdruck auf Papier. Auf Forma- tanweisungen soll wenn möglich verzichtet werden, die Artikel werden beim Satz gestaltet. Für die Planung der Hefte ist eine vorgängige Ankündigung der Artikel bei der Redaktion erwünscht. Adressen der Bryolich-Vorstandsmitglieder Präsidium : Silvia Stofer, WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf.
  • Boletin 50-EDITADO

    Boletin 50-EDITADO

    Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Briología 50 (2018) CONTENIDOS F. PUCHE, J. G. SEGARRA-MORAGUES, S. FOS, C. PEÑA & A. SEBASTIÁN Briófitos de las formaciones de toba calcárea en la Comunitat Valenciana (este de España) ...............1 M. BRUGUÉS & E. RUIZ Timmiella anomala (Bruch & Schimp.) Limpr. en Cataluña .............................................................. 13 E. RUIZ, P. AYMERICH, M. BRUGUÉS & L. SÁEZ Aportaciones al conocimiento de la flora briológica de la sierra del Cadí-Moixeró (Barcelona y Lérida) .................................................................................................................................................. 17 P. HERAS PÉREZ & M. INFANTE SÁNCHEZ Musgos semifósiles del holoceno en el depósito turboso de Peñacerrada (Álava) .............................. 27 Finalizó Flora Briofítica Ibérica ....................................................................................................... 37 Anuncios .......................................................................................................................................... 39 Noticias ............................................................................................................................................ 39 Personalia ......................................................................................................................................... 42 Nuevos socios ..................................................................................................................................
  • Bryophyte Vegetation in Geothermal Areas in Iceland

    Bryophyte Vegetation in Geothermal Areas in Iceland

    Bryophyte vegetation in geothermal areas in Iceland Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des Grades einer Diplom-Biologin der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn vorgelegt von Stefanie Wilberscheid Bonn, den 31. März 2008 Archive for Bryology Special Volume 4 ISSN 0945-3466 Referent: Professor Dr. Jan-Peter Frahm Koreferent: Dr. Bodo Maria Möseler Archive for Bryology Special Volume 4 ISSN 0945-3466 Table of contents 1 Table of contents Table of contents........................................................................................................................I List of Figures and tables........................................................................................................ II 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 State of Knowledge .......................................................................................................1 1.1.1 Geothermal areas as a habitat for plants................................................................. 1 1.1.2 Impact on plants ..................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Bryophytes in geothermal areas ............................................................................. 4 1.2 Study area...................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1 Geology of Iceland................................................................................................
  • Campyliadelphus Elodes Campylium Elodes Fine-Leaved Feather-Moss

    Campyliadelphus Elodes Campylium Elodes Fine-Leaved Feather-Moss

    Hypnales Campyliadelphus elodes Campylium elodes Fine-leaved Feather-moss 1 mm 3 mm 1 mm Identification C. elodes is rather slender, with irregularly and rather loosely branched, dull green or yellow-green shoots. The leaves are very narrowly spearhead-shaped, gradually tapering from base to tip, and widely spreading or somewhat curved. They have a long, single nerve, which can usually be observed with a good hand lens on the larger stem leaves. The more robust shoots may reach 5–6 cm or more in length, and the stem leaves are about 2 mm long. Microscopical examination will confirm the presence of small, distinct, compact patches of cells at the leaf base. Capsules are rarely seen. Similar species A number of slender pleurocarps are similar to C. elodes, but differ in having a shorter nerve, not extending into the leaf tip. They include C. chrysophyllus (p. 711), which occurs in drier habitats, Amblystegium serpens (p. 702), usually a very small plant when it occurs on damp sand, and Drepanocladus polygamus (p. 713), which is generally a much larger moss. Cratoneuron filicinum (p. 701) has a strong nerve like C. elodes, but has distinctly wider stem leaves that are more or less triangularly heart-shaped below. With careful observation it is usually possible to see the large, distinct patches of cells at the base of C. filicinum leaves, and, if well-developed, the miniature leaf-like structures on the stems. Habitat A species of moist and wet habitats, especially those that are periodically submerged, growing in turf and among other bryophytes, sometimes on wood, especially in base- rich marshes and seepages, on damp sand, and in slacks and ditches in sand dunes.
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format

    Download Full Article in PDF Format

    Cryptogamie, Bryologie, 2003, 24 (3): 241-252 © 2003 Adac. Tous droits réservés Bryophyte Flora of South Banat (Vojvodina, Yugoslavia) Marko SABOVLJEVIC*´ Department of Plant Ecology and Phytogeography, Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden, Faculty of Biology,University of Belgrade, Takovska 43, YU – 11000 Belgrade Serbia, Yugoslavia (Received 9 September 2002, Accepted 5 May 2003) Abstract – As a result of field surveys during 2001, the bryophyte flora of South Banat (Serbia N, Yugoslavia) is reported to include 167 taxa (161 mosses and 6 liverworts), of which 130 are new to the region of Banat, 113 new to the province of Vojvodina (Serbia N), 22 new to Serbia and 10 new to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Some aspects of their biogeography and ecology are discussed. Résumé – Suite à l’étude des récoltes effectuées au cours de l’année 2001, il est établi que la flore des bryophytes de Banat du sud (Serbie N, Yougoslavie) comprend 167 taxons (161 mousses et 6 hépatiques), dont 130 sont nouveaux pour la région de Banat, 113 pour la province de Vojvodina (Serbie N), 22 pour la Serbie et 10 pour la République Fédérale de Yougoslavie. Certains aspects de la biogéographie et de l’écologie de cette bryoflore sont analysés. Flora / Bryophytes / South Banat / Serbia / Yugoslavia INTRODUCTION This study provides a floristic catalogue of the bryophyte taxa recorded in South Banat during 2001, together with those quoted in the bibliography for the region. The catalogue adds substantially to the records already known for the province of Vojvodina (70 new moss species and 10 liverworts). The region of South Banat is situated in the province of Vojvodina in northern Serbia (Fig.
  • Mosses of the Mediterranean, an Annotated Checklist

    Mosses of the Mediterranean, an Annotated Checklist

    Cryptogamie, Bryologie, 2013, 34 (2): 99-283 © 2013 Adac. Tous droits réservés Mosses of the Mediterranean, an annotated checklist Rosa M. ROS a*, Vicente MAZIMPAKA b Usama ABOU-SALAMA c, Michele ALEFFI d, Thomas L. BLOCKEEL e, Montserrat BRUGUÉS f, Rosa Maria CROS f, Maria Giovanna DIA g, Gerard M. DIRKSE h, Isabel DRAPER b, Wagieh EL-SAADAWI c, Adnan ERDA∆ i, Anna GANEVA j, Rosalina GABRIEL k, Juan M. GONZÁLEZ-MANCEBO l, Camille GRANGER m, Ilana HERRNSTADT n, Vincent HUGONNOT o, Kamel KHALIL p, Harald KÜRSCHNER q, Anna LOSADA-LIMA l, Leena LUÍS r, Stefan MIFSUD s, Maria PRIVITERA t, Marta PUGLISI t, Marko SABOVLJEVI± u, Cecilia SÉRGIO r, Haanaa M. SHABBARA c, Manuela SIM-SIM r, André SOTIAUX v, Roberta TACCHI w, André VANDERPOORTEN v, Olaf WERNER a In Memoriam to A.J.E. SMITH aUniversidad de Murcia, Facultad de Biología, Departamento de Biología Vegetal, Campus de Espinardo, 30100-Murcia, Spain. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] bUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología, Ctra. de Colmenar Viejo Km 15, 28049 Madrid, Spain. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] cBotany Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Abbasia, Cairo, Egypt. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] dScuola di Scienze Ambientali, Laboratorio di Briologia, Università degli Studi di Camerino, Via Pontoni, 5 - 62032 Camerino (MC), Italy. E-mail: [email protected] eAshfurlong Close, Dore, Sheffield S17 3NN, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] fDepartament de Biologia Animal, Vegetal i Ecologia, Unitat de Botànica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Pilot Project to Assess the Feasibility of Revising the European Bryophyte Red List

    Pilot Project to Assess the Feasibility of Revising the European Bryophyte Red List

    Pilot project to assess the feasibility of revising the European bryophyte Red List Photo: N.G. Hodgetts 2012 2 Pilot project to assess the feasibility of revising the European bryophyte Red List N.G. Hodgetts European Bryophyte Red List - Pilot Project Contents Preface 5 Abstract 6 Introduction 7 Why is a new bryophyte Red List for Europe necessary? 7 Aims 8 The importance of bryophytes 8 Ecological 8 Water retention 9 Colonisation, soil stabilisation, and accumulation of humus 9 Peat formation 9 Relationships with other organisms 9 The economic and medicinal uses of bryophytes 9 Bryophytes as indicators 10 The cultural and aesthetic qualities of bryophytes 11 Bryophytes in science and education 11 What is a Red List? 12 Towards a new bryophyte Red List for Europe 13 The quality of bryophyte data in Europe and gaps in the information resource 13 Who will produce a new Red List? 16 Funding 16 Project outline for a new European bryophyte Red List 18 Project structure 18 Red Listing categories and criteria 18 Geographical coverage 18 Taxonomy 19 Which taxa should be evaluated? 19 Data collection and mapping 19 Output 19 Draft Work Programme 20 References 21 Appendix 1. European bryophyte checklists and Red Lists 22 Appendix 2. European bryological societies and journals 33 Appendix 3. Floras 35 Appendix 4. Recording and mapping projects 36 References 40 Appendix 5. ECCB Country Contacts 43 4 European Bryophyte Red List - Pilot Project Preface The Board of the ECCB (European Committee for the Conservation of Bryophytes) met in Zurich 2011 and agreed that the Bryophyte Red List for Europe from 1995 badly needed to be updated and replaced.