Description of document: Annual Historical Review, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), FY 1992
Request date: 10-June-2008
Released date: 22-October-2015
Posted date: 09-November-2015
Source of document: Freedom Of Information Act Request Commander, INSCOM ATTN: IAMG-C-FOI 4552 Pike Road Fort Meade, MD 20755-5995 Fax: (301) 677-2956
The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION/PRIVACY OFFICE FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-5995
Freedom of Information/ Privacy Office 2 2 OCT 2075
This is in further response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request of June 10, 2008, for a copy of the INSCOM Annual History for FY1992 and supplements our letter of June 11, 2009.
Coordination has been completed with other elements of this command and other government agencies. The records have been returned to this office for our review and direct response to you.
We have completed a mandatory declassification review in accordance with Executive Order (EO) 13526. As a result of our review information has been sanitized and 41pages are being withheld in their entirety as the information is currently and properly classified TOP SECRET, SECRET and CONFIDENTIAL according to Sections 1.2(a)(1 ), 1.2(a)(2), 1.2(a)(3) and 1.4(c) of EO 13526. This information is exempt from the public disclosure provisions of FOIA pursuant to Title 5 U.S. Code 552 (b)(1 ). It is not possible to reasonably segregate meaningful portions of the withheld pages for release. A brief explanation of the applicable sections follows:
Section 1.2(a)(1) of EO 13526, provides that information shall be classified TOP SECRET if its unauthorized disclosure reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security.
Section 1.2(a)(2) of EO 13526, provides that information shall be classified SECRET if its unauthorized disclosure reasonably could be expected to cause serious damage to the national security.
Section 1.2(a)(3) of EO 13526, provides that information shall be classified CONFIDENTIAL if its unauthorized disclosure reasonably could be expected to cause damage to the national security.
Section 1.4(c) of EO 13526, provides that information pertaining to intelligence activities, intelligence sources or methods, and cryptologic information shall be considered for classification protection.
Information has been withheld that would result in an unwarranted invasion of the privacy rights of the individuals concerned, this information is exempt from the public disclosure provisions of the FOIA per Title 5 U.S. Code 552 (b)(6). -2-
In addition, information has been sanitized from the records as the release of the information would reveal sensitive intelligence methods. This information is exempt from public disclosure pursuant to Title 5 U.S. Code 552 (b)(7)(E) of the FOIA. The significant and legitimate governmental purpose to be served by withholding is that a viable and effective intelligence investigative capability is dependent upon protection of sensitive investigative methodologies.
The withholding of the information described above is a partial denial of your request. This denial is made on behalf of Major General George J. Franz, Ill Commanding, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, who is the Initial Denial Authority for Army intelligence investigative and security records under the Freedom of Information Act and may be appealed to the Secretary of the Army. If you decide to appeal at this time, your appeal must be post marked no later than 60 calendar days from the date of our letter. After the 60-day period, the case may be considered closed; however, such closure does not preclude you from filing litigation in the courts. You should state the basis for your disagreement with the response and you should provide justification for reconsideration of the denial. An appeal may not serve as a request for additional or new information. An appeal may only address information denied in this response. Your appeal is to be made to this office to the below listed address for forwarding, as appropriate, to the Secretary of the Army, Office of the General Counsel.
Commander U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command Freedom of Information/Privacy Office (APPEAL) 2600 Ernie Pyle Street, Room 3S02-B Fort George G. Meade, Maryland 20755-5910
We have been informed by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that their information is exempt from public disclosure pursuant to Title 5 U.S. Code 552 (b)(1) of the FOIA. The applicable Sections of the Executive Order are Sections 1.4(c) and 3.3 (b)(1 ). Additional information, while no longer meeting the requirements for declassification, must be withheld on the basis of Section 3.5(c).
The withholding of the information by the CIA constitutes a denial of your request and you have the right to appeal this decision to the Agency Release Panel within 45 days from the date of this letter. If you decide to file an appeal, it should be forwarded to this office and we will coordinate with the CIA on your behalf. Please cite CIA #EOM-2011-00283/Army #583F-08 assigned to your request so that it may be easily identified.
The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) has informed our office that their information is exempt from public disclosure pursuant to Title 5 U.S. Code 552 (b)(1) of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
The withholding of the information by the DIA constitutes a denial of your request and you have the right to appeal this decision directly to the DIA. If you decide to file an appeal, it should be forwarded to the Director, Defense Intelligence Agency, Attention: DAN-1A, FOIA, Washington, DC 20340-5100. Please cite DIA Case #MDR-0044-2011 assigned to your request so that it may be easily identified. -3-
Additionally, we have been informed by the National Security Agency (NSA) that portions of their information has been sanitized from the records pursuant to the exemptions listed below:
5 U.S. Code 552(b)(1) - The information is properly classified in accordance with the criteria for classification in Section 1.4(c) of Executive Order 13526.
5 U.S. Code 552(b){3) - The specific statutes are listed below:
50 U.S. Code 3605 (Public Law 86-36 Section 6) 50 U.S. Code 3024(i) 18 U.S. Code 798
The initial denial authority for NSA information is the Director Associate Director for Policy and Records. Any person denied access to information may file an appeal to the NSA/CSS FOIA/PA Appeal Authority. The appeal must be postmarked no later than 60 calendar days of the date of the initial denial. The appeal shall be in writing to the NSA/CSS FOIA/PA Appeal Authority (DJP4), National Security Agency, 9800 Savage Mill Road, STE 6248, Fort George G. Meade, Maryland 20755-6248. The appeal shall reference the initial denial of access and shall contain, in sufficient detail and particularity, the grounds upon which the requester believes release of the information is required. The NSA/CSS FOIA/PA Appeal Authority will endeavor to respond to the appeal within 20 working days after receipt, absent unusual circumstances.
We apologize for any inconvenience this delay may have caused you.
Copies of the records are enclosed for your use. You have received all available Army intelligence investigative records concerning this subject at this headquarters.
There are no assessable FOIA fees.
If you have any questions regarding this action, feel free to contact this office at 1-866-548- 5651, or email the INSCOM FOIA office at: usarmy.meade.902-mi-grp-mbx.inscom-foia-service [email protected] and refer to case #583F-08.
Sincerely, ~lL!1A Joanne Benear Chief Freedom of Information/Privacy Office
Enclosure ANNUAL HISTORICAL REVIEW
U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND
FISCAL YEAR 1992
History Office Office of th~ Chiefof Staff Headquarters, U.S. Anny Intelligence and Security Command Nolan Building 8825 Beulah Street • Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-5246
(RCS CSHIS-6(4)) September 1993 APPENDED DOCUMEN"." CQNTArr~s SPECiAL 1 NELLIGtN·:~ M,A, TEP.IA!.
1;ci: ii~L[;..3,:..i3LE TO FORE!Gfi iiATIONAL.5 ~ -- --- I Ul&USS\HEll , : ,•.' -.. ·_ .
-- .-,, ..: .. ·., -
.•·._':, ,.
WARNING
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AFFECTING THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES WITIIlN THE MEANING OF THE ESPIONAGE LAWS, U.S. CODE TITLE 18, SECTIONS 793, 794, AND 798. THE LAW PROHIBITS ITS TRANSMISSION OR · .,.,.. · THE REVELATION OF ITS CONTENTS IN ANY ... MANNER PREJUDICIAL TO THE SAFETY OR INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANY FOREIGN GOVERNMENT TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE KEPT IN COMINT · CHANNELS AT ALL TIMES: IT IS TO BE SEEN ONLY BY U.S. PERSONNEL ESPECIALLY INDOCTRINATED AND AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE COMINT INFORMATION ON A STRICTLY NEED-TO-KNOW BASIS. REPRODUCTION AND/OR FURTHER DISSEMINATION OF THIS DOCUMENT OUTSIDE THE U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR HQ INSCOM APPROVAL.
..
ii -tOttf\BENTIM: ·., ..
CONTENTS
Chapter :'<, Page I. MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND LOCATION Mission and Functions ...... '.,.1'. Location...... 2
II. COMMAND AND STAFF RELATIONSHIPS Command and Staff Relationships...... · 3
Ill. ORGANIZATION INSCOM Organization ...... 5 Command Organizational Issues...... 10
IV. · RESOURCE AND MANAGEMENT MAC OM MOU with Corps of Engineers ...... '.·' . '.12. MACOM SCIF ...... 12 1992 INSCOM Commanders' Conference ...... 12 Procurement of Non-Tactical Vehicles ...... 12 Relocation of 513th and 470th Brigades ...... 12 Satellite Commercial Ticketing Office ...... 14 Annual Chief of Staff, Army Supply Excellence Award .. .. 15 Philip A. Connelly Award ...... 15 Closure of Two INSCOM Dining Facilities...... 15 Commanding General's Award for Maintenance Excellence ...... 15 Closure of Field Station Berlin...... 15 Closure of Field Station Sinop...... 16 Closure of Field Station Augsburg ...... 16 Dispositon Task Force ...... 16 Military Awards ...... 17 Commander's Plaque for Operational Achievement...... 17 General Douglas MacArthur Leadership Award ...... 17 INSCOM Organization Day~ ...... 17 INSCOM Civilian Placement Program (ICPP) ...... 17 HODA High-Grade Position Freeze ...... 18 Recruitment of Interns ...... 18
RHiRADFD I !NCI ASSIF,ED 0Nl20 October 2015 BY USAlNSCOM FOi PA Auth Para .t-102 DOD 5200. lR ,e iii -£0Nf \BEN1\~l
Chapter IV. RESOURCE AND MANAGEMENT (Continued) Army Management Staff College ...... 19 USAINSCOM Equal Employment Opportunity Award ...... 20 EEO Complaints...... 20 INSCOM Desert Shield/Storm Program Budget...... 20 INSCOM Counternarcotics Program Budget...... 20 Hurricane .Andrew...... 20 Turkish Base Maintenance Contract (TBMC) ...... 20 ODP/WODP ...... 20 EEO Overview Statistics ...... 23 Manage Civilians to Budget (MCB) ...... 24 U.S. Army Russian Institute (USARI) Program Budget . Change ...... 24 INS COM OMA Funding Program ...... 24 Direct Funding by Sub-Program ...... 24 Annual Funding Program (AFP) ...... 24 Direct Obligations by Element of Resource (EOR) for FY 1992...... 27 Productivity Capital Investment Program (PCIP) ...... 27 RDT&E Funding...... 27 Consolidated Cryptologic Progrma (CCP) ...... 28 Civilian Pay Obligations ...... 28 Intelligence Contingency Fund ...... 28 Congressional Reduction ...... 28 INSCOM Investment Strategy Task Force ...... 28 Defense Business Operating Fund (DBOF) ...... 29 Stock Fund Depot Level Reparables (SFDLR) Program ...... 29 Command Unit Documentation...... 30 Memorandum of Understanding/Agreement {MOU/MOA) Program ...... 30 Productivity Capital Investment Program (PCIP) ...... 31 INSCOM Program and Budget Guidance ...... 31 Organizations and Functions Program ...... 31 Automation OMA Funds ...... 31 Michelangelo Computer Virus ...... 32 DOD Intelligence Information System (DODllS) ...... 32 GDIP Budget Cut Drill...... 32
RE~iRADFD ITNC! ASSIF!yl ON_20 October 2015 _ iv BY USAINSCOM FOi PA Auth Parn4-102 DOD5200.IR CONFlBENtlAL
·Chapter IV. RESOURCE AND MANAGEMENT (Continued) Army Intelligence Agency (AIA) Residual Spaces ...... 32 Military Interdepartmental Purchase Requests (MIPR*s) ...... ; ...... 32 Automation Requirements Checklist Submissions ...... 32 Managing Civilians to Budget (MCB) ...... 33 Mail Processing ...... 33 Impression Count...... 33 Inspector General Action Request (IGAR) ...... 33 Court Martials...... 34 INSCOM Journal...... 34 General Douglas MacArthur Leadership Award ...... 34 INSCOM 1991 Keith L. Ware Winners ...... 34 Command Staff Meetings ...... 36 Command Entry and Exit Procedures ...... 36 701 st Military Intelligence Brigade Discontinuance...... 37 General Defense Intelligence Program (GDIP) ...... 37 Veterans Day Retreat Ceremony ...... 38 Adopt-A-School Partnership Army Mentoring and Tutoring Program ...... 38 National Intelligence Meritorious Unit Citation Intelligence Community Awards ...... 39 17th Annual Army Intelligence Ball ...... 39 Vint Hill Farms Station Golden Anniversary...... 39 Military Intelligence Branch Quarterly Newsletter...... 39 IN SC OM Mission ...... 39 CFC Kick-Off...... : ...... 40 Discontinuance of U.S. Army Intelligence Agency (AIA) .. 40 Transfer of U.S. Army Foreign Language Training Center Europe ...... 40 Travis Trophy Awards ...... 40 Top Quality Management (TOM) ...... 41 50th Anniversary of World War II Commemoration Committee ...... 41
REGRADED IJNCLA'>SIFIED ON/20 October 2015 I BY I ISAINSCOM FOi PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 52WUR
v -BONf lDENTlAt eoNr\BENT\~L
Chapter V. OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES ,-.:.· .. : Multidiscipline
Top Ten Objectives for 1992 ...... ~ ...... , :42 Restationing/Reorganization of 66th Ml Brigade...... ''42 INSCOM Joint Intelligence Center (JIC) Augmentation ...... '43 4 70th Ml Brigade Planning Actions ...... · ·· .. 43 Intelligence Field Operating Activities Consolidation! · Resubordination ...... 43 INSCOM Counter-Drug (CD) Implementation Strategy ...... 44 Aviation Incident in Korea ...... 44 INSCOM Ml Battalion (Low Intensity) (MIBLI) Developments ...... ~ ...... :44 Air Reconnaissance Low (ARL} ...... 45 Small Aerostat Surveillance System (SASS/Sea Based Aerostate (SBA) Program ...... 45
Counterintellgience/Operations Security Counterintelligence Reporting ...... 47 The Resources Crunch ...... 48 Counterespionage Cases ...... 49 Realigning Counterespionage Targeting ...... , 49 Internal Source Program (ISP) ...... 49 Counterintelligence Support to the Department of Justice ...... 49 Special Security Group (SSG) Decentralization ...... 50 Counterintelligence Support to Treaty Monitoring ...... 50 Personnel Security Investigations (PSI) ...... 51 Acquisition Systems P.rotection Program (ASPP) ...... 51 Relocation of Badge and Credentials (B&C) Office ...... 51 Communications Security (COMSEC) Inspection Mission Transfer...... 52 COMSEC Monitoring and Counter-SIG INT Issues ...... 52 COMSEC Incidents and Insecurities...... 53 Telephone Monitoring Equipment Upgrade ...... 53 Technical Surveillance Countermeasures (TSCM) and
REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON I20 October 2015 j BY USAINSCOM FOI PA vi Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200JR
1r; en~·.. , I .. r·. r-r..111· t •• n'""'~ ~ '. : ~-..# ~ ·~ '. } --· ~ f \ 11 L..,. Chapter v. OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES (Continued) ._,, .. Counterintellgience/Operations Security TEMPEST Issues ...... 53 Mobile Tempest Testing System (MTIS)/Mobile TEMPEST Detection System (MTDS) ...... ·54 Transfer of TSCM Training ...... ~ .. . :·~, 54· INSCOM Polygraph Program ...... ···.·. 55· INSCOM Counterintelligence (Cl) Conference ...... 56
HUMINTfTAREX HU MINT HU INT Realignments...... 57 (bJ(1 Per DIA Program...... 57 PORTWATCHER Program...... ··57 Counter-Drug (CD) Setbacks...... 58 Linguist Support to the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA}...... 58 Project SEEK...... 58 Significant HUM INT Reporting...... 59 Systematic Flaws...... 59 Tying Up Loose Ends...... 59 TOLTEC SPEAR...... 59 Award for Director of Operations, 66th Ml Brigade...... 60 Cover Support Actions...... 60 TONAL KEY...... 60 Support Structure Program...... 61 DOD Proposed Directive on Proprietaries...... 61 Cover Support to Reserve Exploitation Program, Army (REPA)...... 61 Army-Air Force Exchange Service (MFES) Support to INSCOM...... 62 DOD HUM INT Reorganization...... 62
TAREX Target Exploitation (TAREX)...... 63 Warrant Office Positions Under GREAT SKILLS Program...... 63
vii 7 Chapter V. . OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES (Continued) TAREX (b) (1) Per NSA,(b)(3):50 USC 3024(i),(b)(3):P.L. 86-36 64 64 64
SIGINT/EW INSCOM/NSA Relationship...... 65 OM SIGINTStrate ...... 65 (b) (1) Per NSA,(b)(1) Per CIA,(b)(3):50 USC 3024(i),(b)(3):P.L 86-36 65 66 66 67 68 68 68 69 69 69 69 71 71 71 71
72 72 72
IMINT/MASINT JNSCOM /MINT Program Secondary Imagery Dissemination (SID)...... 73 European IMINT Reorganization...... 73 U.S. Army Strategic Imagery Detachment, Pacific (SIDPAC)...... 74 ... -CONFIDENTIAL
Chapter v. OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES (Continued) IMINT/MASINT /NSCOM MAS/NT Program ... INSCOM Measurement and Signature lnteligence . . '·• (MASINT) Program ...... ,.·. 75 CEILING ZONE ...... :· 75 CEILING LIGHT...... -.:· .·: ... . 75 CEILING LAND ...... 75 CEILING RAIN ...... ' 75 CELLOPHANE FIRE ...... 76 Korean Operations ...... : 76 Systems ...... :;·;. 76 Laser Collection ...... · 76 Infrared Collection ...... 76 Millimeter Wave Collection...... · 77 OtherCollectors ...... 77 Doctrinal Issues ...... 77
Appendix A. USAINSCOM Organizational Structure...... 78 B. TOE Units ...... 82 C. Changes in Status of TOE Units ...... 84 D. TOA Units ...... 86 E. Changes in Status of TOA Units ...... 89 F. Provisional Units ...... : .. 94 G. Changes in Status of Provisional Units ...... 95 H. USAINSCOM Key Personnel...... 97 I. Travis Trophy Winners ...... 108 J. Director's Trophy Winners ...... 110
Figures No. 1. Power Projection Brigade Estimated Cost...... 14 2. Officer Personnel Strength Posture...... 21 3. Enlisted Personnel Strength Posture...... 22 4. Enlisted Personnel Strength Posture by Area and Unit...... 22
~l~t8~tbb~ 2o1~SIF!JD BY USJ\INSCOM FOi PA Auth Parn-l-102 DOU 520fl.!R ix q CON Fi DEN ii AL CONRBENTIAL
Page GLOSSARY...... 112
INSCOM Staff Directory
REGR ADFD J!NCI ASSIFIFD oNl20 October 2015 j BY USAINSCOM FOi PA Auth Para Hl2 DOD 52011. IR
x /0 CONF\BEN11AL Chapter I
MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND LOCATION
(b)(1)
II (b)(1)
Location. (U) All elements of Headquarters, U.S. Army Intelligence ancj: . Security Command (INSCOM) were located on the North Post of Fort Belyoir, Virginia 22060. The command group and principal staff elements occupied the four floors of the Nolan Building (Building 2444) on Beulah Road. Headquarters support elements that could not be housed in the Nolan Building occupied reconverted structures elsewhere on North Post (Buildings 1809 and 2101C). Unmarried troops assigned to INSCOM were billeted in McCrae Barracks, also on North Post.
2
/2- Chapter II
COMMAND AND STAFF RELATIONSHIPS
. -.~ ' " . '' . "'"~-1 . .·•
Command and Staff Relationships. (U) The CG, INSCOM is under .· · -·. ::_; supervision of the Chief of Staff, U.S. Army. Directives, authorities, policy~, : planning, and programming guidance, approved programs; resource allocations, and other methods of command direction are issued to CG, INSCOM by the_:,. Chief of Staff, U.S. Army. '
(U) The CG, INSCOM-
1. (U) Commands all assigned units and activities.
2. (U) Is subordinate to the Chief, Central Security Service (CHCSS) for the conduct of signal intelligence (SIGINT) operations.·
3. (U) Manages SIGINT resources to accomplish SIGINT operational tasks assigned by Director, National Security Agency/Chief, Central Security Service (DIRNSA/CHCSS).
4. (U) Provides specified military personnel and administrative, logistic, and operational support to the DIRNSA/CHCSS.
5. (U) Deals directly with the Director, DIA for the coordination of human intelligence (HUMINT) operational proposals.
(U) INSCOM and other major Army commands (MACOM's) are coordinate· elements of DA The CG, INSCOM is authorized to communicate directly with other major Army commanders or with heads of Army Staff agencies on matters of mutual interest.
(U) The CG, INSCOM will maintain liaison as necessary with other MACOM's, field operating agencies, other cryptologic and intelligence activities, and other foreign domestic governmental agencies to maintain an awareness of, to exchange information on, and to ensure coordination of matters of mutual concern.
(U) The CG, INSCOM acts as executive agent for logistic support, SIGINT technical support, and mission steerage for the DA TROJAN program, an effort to provide units in garrison with live signals for training (and possibly operational) purposes. INSCOM has the responsibility to ensure adequate SIGINT technical support and mission steerage to TROJAN users.
3 13
~---·------·- (U) INSCOM does not have a responsibility in the areas of developing, fielding, and testing the TROJAN systems nor for any product improvement plans (PIP); these are the responsibility of the Army Materiel Command's U.S. Army Electronics Research and Development Command which implements these activities through its project manager, the U.S. Army Signals Warfare Laboratories. The U.S. Army Information Systems Command (USAISC) has full responsibility for communications support to include: cryptonet establishment, Defense Special Security Communications System (DSSCS) requirements, commercial communications contracts, and overall communications monitoring requirements.
4 Chapter Ill
ORGANIZATION
INSCOM Organization. (U) At the close of FY 1992, there was a total of 79 units (26 TOE and 53 TOA) within INSCOM. The TOA figure does not include Provisional units. All types of units are listed in appendix A For individual lists of TOE, TOA, and Provisional units at the close of FY 1992, see appendices B, 0, and F respectively. Changes in the status of TOE, TOA, and Provisional units are listed in.appendices C, E, and G.
(U) MG Charles F. Scanlon served as CG, INSCOM throughout the reporting period. BG Michael M. Schneider continued on as Deputy Commanding General. The position of Deputy Commanding General, Production was eliminated as a result of the discontinuance of the Army Intelligence Agency (AIA) on 10 April 1992. COLjCbl(6J !was INSCOM Chief of Staff for most of the reporting period; he was succeeded by COLl (U) Staff organization underwent some functional realignment during the reporting period. At the end of FY 1992, Headquarters, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command was organized to consist of a Command Group, Office of the Chief of Staff, Special Staff, Personal Staff, and Coordinating Staff as shown below. Command Group: Commanding General (CGJ. (U) The CG, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command was responsible to the Chief of Staff, U.S. Army for accomplishment of the missions and functions prescribed by AR 10-53 and was concurrently responsible to the Chief, Central Security Service for all signal intelligence (SIGINT) activities for which the National Security Agency/Central Security Service (NSACSS) were responsible. Deputy Commander (DCGJ. (U) The deputy commander assisted the commander in the management of all intelligence and support operations of INSCOM to include the review and execution of all tasked and delegated operations and the determination of future requirements. 5 ''~!" ~- .. I I ·.· · ' ~ Senior NSA Cryptologic Advisor. (U) A member of the Command Group·'· ·· Staff, the Senior NSA Cryptologic Advisor was responsible for advising and ': : assisting the CG, INSCOM in the effective development, validation, and .. < , . execution of national SIGINT requirements of interest or tasked to the U.S'. Afmy for signals intelligence exploitation. · •· _, Command Sergeant Major (CSMJ. (U) The Command Sergeant Major a~ the senior enlisted person in the command provided advice and assistance to .the .· CG on all matters involving enlisted personnel. :. • ..I ·.... Office of the Chief of Staff: Chief of Staff ;_,, Deputy Chief of Staff (DCSJ. (U) The DCS acted for the Chief of Staff during his absence and assisted to coordinate all actions of the HQ INSCOM staff, and supervised the activities of and provided support to the Secretary of the General Staff. The DCS directly supervised the Protocol Office. · Secretary of the General Staff (SGS}. (U) The SGS acted as executive officer for the CofS and as office manager for the offices of the CG, DCG, and CofS. Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff. (U) The Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff acted as special advisor and consultant to the commander, deputy commander, and the Chief of Staff. Chief, Internal Review ORJ Office. (U) Served as the principal advisor to the CG, INSCOM on internal review matters. Conducted independent review and examination of command operations and internal controls to provide the commander with an objective evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency with which his financial and related functions were being performed. Intelligence Oversight Officer 000). (U) This office exercised supervision over the propriety and conformity to law and regulations of all INSCOM activities. Army Liaison Office (ALNOJ. (U) Serves as the U.S. Army representative, in a cryptologic capacity with National Security Agency/Central Security Service. 6 r ~ r r ,x._ r. 0 ~ • ! l r !(p • 4 • t.mt"'· ~------.. ·.. " UNClASSlf IED Principal Assistant Responsible for Contracting fPARCJ. (U} The PARC. is the senior staff offidal responsible for oversight and administration of all aspects of contracting. During the course of the reporting period, the PARC was-.also. :< dual-hatted as Deputy Chief of Staff, Contracting; however, as a result of a> . . •. manpower study, it was decided at the end of FY 1992 to disestablish this~ element, separate the PARC's advisory functions from all involvement with·:·. .. contracting, and recreate a separate Contract Support Activity as a field . operating agency. · ··< · Headquarlers Supporl Activity fHSAJ. (U} This served as the liaison_element between the headquarters and the host installation, Fort Belvoir. Special Staff: Public Affairs Officer (PAOJ. (U) Served as the Public Affairs Officer of· INSCOM, advising the commander and staff on all public affairs matters: \ Command Chaplain. (U) Served as the chaplain of INSCOM providing advice and assistance to the commander and his staff on religious, moral, leadership, and human self-development matters. Personal Staff: Inspector General UGJ. (U) The IG, as member of the personal staff, inquired into and reported upon matters affecting the performance of mission and state of the economy, efficiency, discipline, and morale of every phase of activity which was within the sphere of responsibility of the commanding general and as · prescribed by law. The IG Office consisted of the Plans and Analysis Division, the Inspections Division, and the Assistance and Investigations Division. Staff Judge Advocate fSJAJ. (U) The SJA served as legal advisor to the CG, DCG, CofS, and all staff elements of HQ INSCOM and, as necessary, to subordinate elements of the command. General Staff: (U) INSCOM Headquarters was comprised of eight major staff elements. These were as follows: Deputy Chief of Staff. Personnel (DCSPERJ. (U} The DC SP ER served as the principal staff officer for the administration of military and civilian personnel. Acted for the CG, INSCOM in the direction, supervision, and coordination of plans, policies, and procedures for personnel administration, distribution, and management; maintenance of order and discipline; safety; welfare; morale; 7 17 /\ j UftCLASSIHED human affairs; and nonappropriated fund activities. DCSPER elements consisted of the Military Personnel Division, Plans and Proponency Division, Human Resources Division, Equal Employment Opportunity Division, and Civilian Personnel Division. Deputy Chief of Staff. Operations (DCSOPSJ. {U) The DCSOPS was the principal coordinating staff officer responsible for current intelligence collection, production, electronic warfare, counterintelligence, and security support operations. He perform the following functions: provide operational policy guidance and direction and coordinated and supervised current operations; managed the REDTRAIN program as Army executive agent and coordinated and supervised its current operations; provided operationally oriented INSCOM interfaces between national, departmental, theater {echelon above corps), and tactical {echelon corps and below) intelligence organizations; served as the staff budget director (current and budget year) for allocation and employment of Program 2, 3, and 8 operational resources; coordinated operational matters with Department of the Army, NSAICSS, DOD, DIA, CIA, FBI, joinUcombined commands, other MACOM's, and other governmental agencies; supervised command aviation activities; prepared and coordinated command operational plans and managed the command operational planning system. Additionally, he supervised the command historical program and exercised staff proponency over the Intelligence Exchange Support Center, counterintelligence support to several "black" special access programs (SAP's), and the Field Support Center. He was also principal coordinating staff officer responsible for USAINSCOM force management functions, to include threat coordination, force design and doctrine, multidiscipline operations support, training, long- and mid-range planning, low intensity conflict, and force structure management. The DCSOPS advises the DCSPER on personnel assignment priorities for development of the Officer Distribution Plan. Effective 1 October 1991, the DCSOPS relinquished operational control of foreign materiel acquisition activities to the Army Intelligence Agency. (U) At the close of FY 1992, DCSOPS consisted of the following major divisions: Administrative Office, Office, Management Office, Psychologist, Intelligence Operations Center {IOC), ADCSOPS Counterintelligence (Cl), ADCSOPS Human Intelligence {HUMINT), ADCSOPS Signal Intelligence and Technical Operations {SIGINTITO), ADCSOPS Force Management (FM) and a field operating agency, the Force Modernization Activity (FMA). Deputy Chief of Staff, Logistics {DCSLOGJ. {U) DCSLOG was the principal coordinating staff officer for logistics, and was responsible for integrated logistics planning policy; procuremenUcontracts; budgeting; distribution, storage, and maintenance of electronic equipment systems {less telecommunications); engineering; construction; support services; transportation; logistics 8 .1· · •• ' : · •• oversighUcompliance; and supply and maintenance management. The · · DCSLOG also had staff supervision of the Materiel Support Activity atVinf.HJll'', · Farms Station and the Maintenance Assistance and Instruction Team Act.ivity~ (MAIT) at Fort Belvoir. On 1 October 1990, MAIT operations in continental ·- · United States (CONUS) were suspended, and personnel detailed to variOU$·; · ··' ·· divisions of DCSLOG to support DESERT SHIELD operations. The MAIT, .. - ' .::. ·. .": program was terminated effective 1 January 1991. • "' · • l :::, :~·.·,. ••· - (U) During FY 1992, the organization of the DC SLOG consisted of the to1foY/ing: Supply and Services Division, Maintenance Division, Engineer and Housing · Division, Systems Engineering Division, Management and Plans Divisio11,, and Administrative Office. ··· . ., .. Deputy Chief of Staff, Resource Management (DCSRMJ. (U) The DCSRM was the principal staff officer in matters concerning management, financial' management, and manpower management. The DCSRM established and· maintained administrative control of appropriated funds, exercised responsibility for manpower management and The Army Authorization Document System· · (TAADS), developed and supervised the implementation of force requirements, administered the structure and strength program, exercised control over the ~ manpower and equipment survey programs, and reviewed and prepared financial and/or manpower annexes for operational and force development · plans. During FY 1992, DCSRM was composed of the following elements: Administrative Office, Budget Division, Finance and Accounting Division, Management Engineering and Analysis Division, and Manpower Division. Deputy Chief of Staff, Information Management (DCSIMJ. (U) The DCSIM was the principal staff assistant to the CG, INSCOM for all matters pertaining to information management. The position was dual-hatted since the DCSIM ·. concurrently served as Director, U.S. Army Information Services Command, IN SC OM (USAISC-INSCOM). DCSIM served as Program Area Director for command programs, budgets, and the Army Management System as they relate to telecommunications/ automation: The DCSIM discharged primary staff responsibilities for engineering, installation, and maintenance of INSCOM information systems. He also exercised staff supervision over operation of the Defense Special Security Communication System (DSSCS), CRITICOMM, and other telecommunications activities of the command. Additionally, he directed development of tactical information systems objectives, concepts, and requirements within INSCOM areas of interest. Finally, the DCSIM exercised operational control over the USAISC Communications Center. The staff element also exercised control over the Automated Systems Activity (ASA). At the end of FY 1992, DCSIM consisted of an Administrative Branch, ADCSIM Telecommunications, ADCSIM Automation, and ADCSIM Information Services. 9 ~ .... ~ II=-. /9 :..~-"· .. ii "'""" .. ;. •. ._. ·..:.·· - ... l a8'l9 ~ - Intelligence Directorate, Reserve Affairs ONDRAI. (U) The primary mission of INDRA (formerly Deputy Chief of Staff, Reserve Affairs (DCSRA)) was to coordinate reserve component support to INSCOM current operations and to advise the commanding general on matters relevant to the reserve components. It managed more than 700 Individual Mobilization Augmentees (IMA's) for HQ INSCOM and the command's subordinate elements. Additionally, the element served as interface between INSCOM's major subordinate commands (MSC's) and their reserve component CAPSTONE units in order to assist in training programs and enhance unit readiness. Deputy Chief of Staff, Security (DCSSECI. (U) The DCSSEC provides major Army command (MACOM) level and HQ-specific security management and support to the CG, INSCOM. The DCSSEC formulated, implemented, and supervised policies and procedures for Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) and collateral material in the functional areas of personnel, physical, information, industrial, TEMPEST, communications, automation, and operations security. DCSSEC was realigned into three separate divisions: Personnel Security, Information Security, and Facilities/Physical Security. Deputy Chief of Staff,.Contracting CDCSCONJ. (U) The DCSCON provided contract support not only to CG, INSCOM, but to AIA headquarters and to DA DCSINT. The element was slated for discontinuance at the end of FY 1992, and would be replaced by a field operating agency. (b)(1) (U) On 1 January 1992, the 703d Ml Brigade at Kunia, Hawaii, organized a new 733d Ml Battalion, and Company D, U.S. Army Military Intelligence Battalion, Low Intensity was activated at Orlando, Florida. On the same day, the 730th Ml 10 I ~ cJ_o t ~ • ~. "' ~ '- ~ " - em!"'!. . .. . : . ~ .. ,· ~ ; ~ f .· , ~ I ~~ ~ ~·~.~ ~J rj f ' ~-·:;;:'\V~i. ~ ... _. \.,,o,~· I:. ~~ Battalion in Europe was discontinued and its personnel and mission transferred to the Foreign Intelligence Activity. As part of the general drawdown of assets in Europe, Field Station Berlin's Operations Battalion was discontinued on 15 January 1992. INSCOM organized a Foreign Intelligence Command (Provisional) at Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, on 1 February 1992 to provide more centralized direction for the human intelligence (HUMINT) and foreign counterintelligence elements located on that post. (U) The merry whirl continued as the Army decided to discontinue the Army Intelligence Agency effective 10 April 1992. Some assets were absorbed by DIA; INSCOM assumed command of the Intelligence and Threat Analysis Center (ITAC), the Foreign Science and Technology Center, and a newly created Intelligence Production Management Activity (Provisional), with DCSINT retaining operational control over these elements. Additionally, INSCOM elements were realigned on a global scale. In Korea, Company B, 532d Ml Battalion was inactivated on 15 May 1992; In Europe, the 701st Ml Brigade's 713th Ml Battalion went out of existence on 17 June 1992, and the 66th Ml Brigade was substantially restructured: the 527th Ml Battalion (Counterintelligence) moved from Kaiserslautern to Augsburg and became a provisional operations battalion in June 1992, absorbing the IMINT assets previously assigned to a provisional imagery and analysis battalion; the 527th's counterintelligence mission and personnel were reassigned to the 18th Ml Battalion. In Turkey, U.S. Army Field Station Sinop discontinued all intelligence operations on 15 September 1992. Finally, in the continental United States (CONUS), the 201 st Ml Battalion at Vint Hill Farms Station activated Company E in July 1992, while the 902d Ml Group's counterespionage battalion in San Francisco, California, was discontinued that same summer. 11 U~ClASSlHED Chapter IV ··'. : . - RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MACOM MOU with Corps of Engineers. (U) INSCOM initiated a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on 24 August 1992 with the U.S~ Atmy. Corps of Engineers, Topographic Engineering Center (TEC) to provide support.. for a period of one year. MACOM SCIF. (U) On 1 October 1992, the Facility Section assumed majo( · Command responsibility for 53 SCIF's worldwide. Three of these SCIF's were later transferred to Defense Intelligence Agency and one to the Army Materiel Command. 1992 INSCOM Commanders' Conference. (U) In April 1992, the DCSL0<3~ was tasked by the Chief of Staff fo plan and execute the 1992 INSCOMt:~:·· .. ; Commanders' Conference. The 1992 Commanders' Conference and Command Sergeants Major Conference were held at the Nolan Building, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 30 September 1992 through 2 October 1992. The DCSLOG was the overall POC for all conference coordination with the assistance of a working committee which represented all functional staffs. Procurement of Non-Tactical Vehicles. (U) INSCOM obtained increased funding for procurement of non-tactical vehicles to maintain the vehicle readiness rate above 95 percent. A total of 1.4 million was received which is sufficient to procure a total of 93 new commercial design, non-tactical vehicles for the command. Replacement of the older vehicles will reduce maintenance expenditures and lost man-hours by improving availability of assets. (U) In addition to arranging for the 93 vehicles that are being procured with FY 1992 funds, the Transportation Office arranged for the redistribution of 26 commercial design, nontactical vehicles from Southwest Asia to support INSCOM subordinate commands and Foreign Area Officer (FAQ) locations worldwide. The vehicles were donated to the U.S. Government by the Government of Japan to support Desert Storm and were no longer needed in Southwest Asia. These additional vehicles will be used to fill vehicle shortages within INSCOM and the FAQ program. Relocation of 513th and 470th Ml Brigades. (U) Planning for a power projection by relocating the 513th and 470th Ml Brigades and consolidating the two brigades into a Power Projection Brigade that features flexibility, high technology, and speed in reaching and supporting contingencies. Using split based operating concepts, the brigade will deploy lighter, mobile equipment, and 12 'r"~~~ , Iii"\ r'T"'r" ~ . "r . \ ~ ~ ~·~ ~ . ... ~· ... ·~~i: ..... ,... ~· ... llGil.11"'.• , ""'~ .... !!""f'- Wi~~~~.hj~'~>~:u high capacity communications into forward areas with the combat units. Intelligence data will be sent back to the CO NUS base where manpower;~.:; '. • intensive intelligence analyses and production is completed. In this mcidem role, the Power Projection Brigade will be capable of providing a global responsf:): to . · regional crises. · ·•; ·• · · (U) The brigade will focus its intelligence power through task organiZa~ion'i, . · drawing from its multidisciplined skill base of human, signals, communicatio.ns, . and other intelligence experts-for tiered deployment to meet the scope and ·: nature of the contingency. The brigade's success relies· upon a home statiorf location which permits close coordination with the supported CINC's, easy .. · : access to training areas, and collocation of its units. To find a suitable location from which to project this power, INSCOM began to study basing requirements for the Power Projection Brigade soon after the conclusion of the Gulf War.. ·· (U) INSCOM received HODA approval to conduct formal site surveys of three candidate installations (Forts Polk, Drum, and Gordon) in February 1992:... · Preliminary results were briefed to the ASA (IL&E), Deputy Chief of Staff.• .· Intelligence (DCSINT), Director of Management (OM), Headquarters, Department of Army (HQDA), and TRADOC. CINCENT, TRADOC, and Fort Gordon have expressed support for the relocation. · (U) Supporting documentation for relocating the 513th and 470th Ml Brigades to Fort Gordon, Georgia, was forwarded to HODA pursuant to the provisions of AR 5-10 on 1 September 1992. The Power Projection Brigade structure at Fort Gordon will be comprised of 1,461 military and 45 civilian authorizations by the end of FY 1995, with further growth to 2,450 military and 45 civilian authorizations by the end of FY 1999. Elements of the 513th from Fort Monmouth (201st and 297th Ml Battalions) and Vint Hill Farms Station (201st Ml Battalion} would relocate to Fort Gordon. (U) Rationale for selecting Fort Gordon was because the fort has sufficient facilities available to allow relocation of the 513th Ml Brigade there now and the creation of a Power Projection Brigade in FY 1995. Costs for establishment of the Power Projection Brigade are significantly less at Fort Gordon when compared to other surveyed sites. MCA costs are estimated to be $31 million at Fort Gordon, $53 million at Fort Polk, $69 million at Fort Drum, and $90 million at Fort Monmouth. Fort Gordon offers over 30,000 acres of contiguous training area which will permit brigade level tactical training and exercise of multitiered intelligence support packages for contingency operations. The Environmental Assessment will be published in the Federal Register for a 30-day public comment period. If no adverse comments are received during the public comment period, the proposed relation package will be presented to the Secretary of Army for Army approval. 13 /' !"~~- r:"'1t.f'\r.,::S"te".11~. ·' v,Gk~·'. '·; . ' ' Figure 1. Power Projection Brigade Estimated Cost FY 1993 OMA Cost: SATCON Design. 200 SATCON Security 1SO SATCOM Power 22S Hardstand 300 Maintenance Bay 17S Motorpool · 163 Barracks 28 COAdmin 82 BnHQ 206 BdeHQ so Ft Gordon Tenant Relocations 300 Com ms 87 Automation so Transportation 150 SNEP 75 PSEP 250 ISA S3 TOTAL $2544K FY 1993 OPA Cost: Shredder and Ups 500 TOTAL $SOOK FY 1994 OMA Cost: Civilian PCS Costs $ 50 Transportation 257 Dual Support During Transition 100 TOTAL $ 357K Satellite Commercial Ticketing Office. (U) INSCOM initiated actions and received approval from HODA to establish a satellite commercial ticketing office at the Nolan Building. This approval was based on a detailed cost analysis indicating that the volume of traffic originating at the Nolan Building would support such an office. Contract award was made on 15 April 1992 with an expected start date in 2d Quarter, FY 1993. The location of this office within the Nolan Building will result in a significant savings in manpower by eliminating the requirement to go to the Fort Belvoir main post transportation office to requesVpickup tickets. 14 ft'~~,1"""·~ ~· ~f"";l«:s?~f!"; .. ~ , ~ 1' ,, " • ' ' . Annual Chief of Staff. Anny Supply Excellence Award. (U) The following units were INSCOM's nominees in the Department of the Army Supply Excellence Award competition: Yn!! Category USAF CA TOA/Co Ml Bn (Cl/CE), 902d Ml Group TOA/Sn 766th Ml Det MTOE/Co 18th Ml Bn MTOE/Bn (U) All units participating in the Chief of Staff, Army Supply Excellence Award were awarded the INSCOM Commanding General's Supply Excellence Award. The 766th Ml Detachment was the DA runner-up in its category of competition for FY 1992. Philip A. Connelly Award. (U) The INSCOM Food Advisor conducted the Annual Food Service evaluations from November 1991-November 1992. The evaluations were conducted as part of the Command Logistics Program (CLIP) and were used to select the INSCOM nominees for the 24th Annual Philip A. Connelly Awards Competition. Final selection of the fiscal year's nominees are to be completed on 4 December 1992. The nominees will be presented with an engraved plaque and a letter of commendation signed by the commanding general. Closure of Two INSCOM Dining Facilities. (U) The dining facility and Troop Issue Subsistence Activity (TISA) in Sinop, Turkey, are scheduled to close in mid-February 1993. Also the 701 st Ml Brigade at Gablingen Kaseme, Augsburg, Germany, is scheduled to deactivate in FY 1993. The 66th Ml Brigade will assume responsibility for the operation of the Gablingen Kaseme dining facility and relocate their 204th Ml Battalion facility from Flak to Sheridan Kaserne in mid-February 1993. Commanding General's Award for Maintenance Excellence. {U) The 3d Ml Battalion; 201st Ml Battalion; A Company, 204th Ml Battalion; 703d Ml Brigade; 751st Ml Battalion; and Ml Battalion (LI) met the criteria for the Commanding General's Award for Maintenance Excellence. The nominees for the DA and DOD Awards for Maintenance Excellence were: DOD Medium-703d Ml Brigade; DA TOA Heavy-Ml Battalion (LI); DA MTOE Heavy-A Company, 204th Ml Battalion; DA TOA lntermediate-751 st Ml Battalion; DA MTOE lntermediate- 308th Ml Battalion; DA TOA Light-HHC, FMIB. Closure of Field Station Berlin. (U) With the announcement of the closure of FS Berlin on 18 October 1990 began an exhaustive full scale effort utilizing select NSACSS, INSCOM, and Tobyhanna Army Depot assets to ensure the 15 / \ . I , .... r------·~~- .. 1 ~ ~ .~ 1·, ~ ;~ n r~ ~ : ~ ~ '., . ' successful dismantling, deinstallation, packing, wrapping, and disposition otall: FS Berlin property. On 12December1991, the NSACSS DOPP acceleratedthe · closure of FS Berlin from July 1993 to September 1992. On 15 January 19~2; . the operations at Wobeck Detachment were turned off and on 1 March 1992,' the: operations at FS Berlin were deactivated. Organizational dismantling otFs·:.·._:, Berlin began with the inactivation of the FS Berlin Command, inactivation ofthe Operations Battalion, and the creation of a Berlin Task Force which itself was inactivated on 30 September 1992. · :. Closure of Field Station Sinop. (U) Upon decision to close the station;: -~ •·· equipment was requested for redistribution. All nonrequested equipment was advertised as excess. Disposition instructions were provided tor all mission · equipment at the field station. Some of the equipment will be selected by the host country for retention on the station. When the host country makes a···· decision about the equipment to be retained, disposition of the excess equipment will commence. All nondeinstallation Engineering Change Proposals (ECP's) were closed. Any contracts associated with the PD's were canceled if possible. Any residue from outstanding PD's will be reassigned to ongoing ·.· · projects at other sites or disposed of through drawdown disposition procedures. Closure of Field Station Augsburg. (U) Project MEAGER installation was completed. Phases I & II of a four phase drawdown and transition plan was implemented and completed. Significant drawdown actions include the · following: a. (U) The 712d and 713th Ml Battalions deactivated; b. (U) Approximately 75 percent of the national mission was terminated and the corresponding equipment deinstalled; c. (U) LFV and the associated remote towers closed; d. (U) The flight detachment deactivated; e. (U) Detachment Schleswig deactivated; and f. (U) The 66th Ml Brigade installed and activated UIES, UCIF, TROJAN, and employed TRACKWOLF. Disposition Task Force. (U) Drawdown of Field Stations Berlin, Augsburg, and Sinop moved rapidly during FY 1992. A key mission placed on SEO was that of providing disposition instructions for mission and mission support equipment at each of these sites. In a 5-month period, disposition instructions were distributed for 9000+ (Berlin), 4500+ (Augsburg), and 3000+ (Sinop) items 16 ~-~-:~- ! ~ ~tnrr.rc-.....rr. ·- - .' '"'." " of equipment. Timing for disposition instructions was most critical for Berlin which closed mid-September 1992, and for Sinop. · · :· ,. · · Military Awards. (U) A total of 7,225 military awards were approved command-_ wide for FY 1992. During FY 1992, recommendations for serVice for those : ;· · · serving in Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm were forwarded to.HQDA for final action. Commander's Plague for Operational Achievement. (U) The Commande~s Plaque for Operational Achievement was presented to Sergeant Michael A:: .. ··. Moskal, 701 st Ml Brigade, during the INS COM Commanders• Conference .. INSCOM Organization Day. (U) INSCOM Day 1992 was held on 21 August 1992. Most of the events and food were supported through the HQ INSCOM Nonappropriated Fund. The event was held in conjunction with the Command Awards Ceremony. The picnic was attended by 1,400 people. The net profit to the HQ INSCOM NAF account was $1,306.43. {U) The 1992 Annual Command Award Recipients were: (b)(6) I Albert W. Small Award-Mr.{701stl Ml Brigade) (b)(6) ==~~C~O~L~--..-----'Military/Civilian Team lmorovement Awards-MAJ ~ (b)(6) Jackie Keith Action Officer of the Year Award-Mr. .______, (66th Ml Brigade) 6 Virginia McDill Award-Mrs.l~ {b)(6) Local National Employee of the Year Award-Mrs J....______, {66th Ml Brigade) · (b)(6) Equal Employment Opportunity Award-Ms. l.______.. (INSCOM MSA-V} (b)(6) I Annual Wage Grade Award-Mr. l.______,(USAFSTC) Volunteer of the Year UnitllndiviJual-Support & Maintenance Co (703d Ml Brigade and Mrs.l INSCOM Civilian Placement Program (ICPP}. (U) The ICPP was established in early FY 1992 for the purpose of placement assistance to INSCOM employees 17 /, --\ ' ' :·_ ~ . ':' ' ~~ .. ~ ..... lfi:.,.f;l.t.....,,,;- ,..~.:.:: '\~i.- whose positions were or will be abolished. During the closure of FS Berlin in FY 1992, there were no employees released as a result of Reduction-in-Force. All employees were placed into other vacant positions within the ICPP or placed with other activities as a result of DOD civilian placement programs. HQDA High-Grade Position Freeze. (U) On 19 February 1992, HQDA froze high-grade positions (GS-13 to 15) and established caps, by grade level, for MACOM's/FOA's based on their 30 September 1991 on-board high grade strength. This freeze will likely continue well into 1993. INSCOM was adversely impacted because the freeze was imposed at a time when subordinate units were in the process of applying CIPMS AOG's for GS-132, -080, -1700, and the Scientific and Technical positions, in addition to the CIPMS Primary Grading Standard (PGS), Part 3, used to classify supervisory positions. Since a number of upgrades had occurred subsequent to the high-grade cap (30 September 1991 ), the command was over the cap from the date of the freeze implementation, with only about two-thirds of the AOGIPGS, Part 3 applieation completed. Partial relief was subsequently granted in the form of approval to effect 96 upgrades of incumbered positions based on AOGIPGS application, however, no adjustment of the cap was authorized. This prevented management from prioritizing and filling vacancies, some of which were not important. Recruitment of Interns. (U) The primary source of new INSCOM intelligence career interns are outside Army (and DOD). The intern program within INSCOM is also an important part of the command affirmative action effort. More than 50 percent of the CP-35 (intelligence) interns graduated over the last 10 years have been female with a substantial number of minority personnel. (U) In February 1992, revised DA guidance removed the freeze exception previously enjoyed by the program which permitted outside Army intern candidates the opportunity for selection as an exception to the freeze policy. The Army freeze policy had dramatically reduced recruitment options available to fill intelligence intern positions. Few internal candidates possessed the highly desired specialized academic study or language proficiency. The revised DA freeze limited the command ability to hire all outside candidates. The 1 for 4 policy limited the recruitment of outside candidates to one selectee for every four INSCOM employees who left DOD. (U) The command had already selected three new Hispanic CP-35 interns when DA imposed the revised freeze. The headquarters also had to cancel a recruitment trip to three Virginia Historically Black Colleges in April 1992. In addition, a high percentage of the replacements for intelligence journeymen vacancies historically have been drawn from the ranks of retiring military personnel. The Army freeze policy restricted our ability to tap this source of experienced intelligence candidates. Therefore, it was requested upon the Army 18 '. ~.. It.~-· .._"'-·~ .. ~' ...... ,._... .,. to approve INSCOM authority to hire outside Army intern candidates as arr . e exception to the freeze prohibition policy. Army granted the exception .. ·:·.' (U) Because INSCOM did not experience sufficient losses outside DOD to.fi'ir. ·... · the most critically needed mission requirements, INSCOM chose not to fill m'any · intelligence intern vacancies. Command efforts to place surplus OCON US· '/ ·~.: personnel against existing vacancies decreased the vacant spaces historicalJy ·.. used to place graduating interns. While the command did not experience:./:.· . serious problems in FY 1992 relative to the placement of interns currently:~·'.:, · · assigned, major difficulties are foreseen in the placement of future interns/' : : (U) Command units and activities which had participated in the program for the past 10 years opted not to accept new interns, parti~ularly intelligence career . interns. Downsizing requirements would severely limit our ability to place interns on command rolls in the immediate future. Therefore it was requested upon the Army to grant an exception to current policy to authorize the retention of. : : .. · intelligence career interns on the Army Civilian Training, Education, and··. · Development System (ACTEDS) rolls for a period of 36 months; Army granted the request. Army approval will permit INSCOM to carry intelligence career · interns on ACTEDS spaces during the unstable period of command downsizing. Anny Management Staff College. (U) During FY 1992, INSCOM significantly increased its participation in the Army Management Staff College (AMSC} program. An effort was initiated to improve both the level of command participation and to increase the number of women and minority applicants for the program. ODCSPER generated a message for command group signature to emphasize the program and to promote the Army goal to nominate more highly qualified women and minority candidates. The announcement memorandum also stressed the value of this program and placed increased emphasis on the importance of assuring all qualified female and minority employees were considered for the program. (U) INSCOM units nominated 16 candidates which represented a 60 percent increase over any previous set of nominations received for an AMSC class. The number of female and minority applicants far outstripped any previous response for the class. Sixty-nine percent of the nominees (11 of 16) were female including four minority females. Ten candidates were submitted for consideration which was a 68 percent increase over any previous command submission. Army selected five INSCOM applicants (four primary, one alternate) for the AMSC class. Three of the five selected were female, including one minority nominee. The results of the next class were even better, representing the best ever achieved by this command. We nominated eight candidates and seven were selected (six primary and one alternate). 19 USAINSCOM Equal Employment Opportunity Award. (U) The U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command Equal Employment Opportunity Award for FY 1992 was presented to Mrs. Linda J. Marshall, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, Mission Support Activity, Vint Hills Farms, Virginia. EEO Complaints. (U) At the end of FY 1992, there were six formal complaints of discrimination within the command. INSCOM Desert Shield/Storm Program Budget. (U) INSCOM's FY 1992 requirements for Operation Desert Shield/Storm totaled $1.3 million ($.3 million for P2; $1.0 million for P38). INSCOM Countemarcotics Program Budget. (U) During FY 1992, INSCOM received from HODA an additional $2.5 million for counternarcotics. Hurricane Andrew. (U) Hurricane Andrew created havoc in Key West, Florida, for three of INSCOM's units: the 470th Ml Brigade, Ml Battalion (LI), and the Foreign Intelligence Activity. Two aircraft were ferried from Orlando, Florida, to Fort Campbell, Kentucky. Service members and families displaced from government housing due to the hurricane were evacuated from Key West to Orlando and returned. Total cost to support the evacuation was $71.BK which included meals, travel, and lodging. Turkish Base Maintenance Contract CTBMC). (U) The Turkish Base Maintenance Contract (TBMC) is a U.S. Air Force managed contract with no Army input. NSA provided $11.5 million for FY 1992 execution; however, the actual cost was $13.0 million. The FY 1992 Congressional Language authorized NSA to accommodate the cost arising from the renegotiated Turkish agreement at SINOP; however, funding was generated internally due to the closure of Field Station Berlin and anticipated closure of Field Station Sinop. ODP/WODP. (U) The ODP was received and allocated by June 1992. FY 1993 ODP was 89 percent of authorizations; an increase from 86 percent for FY 1991. FY 1993 WODP was received in July and allocated by August 1992. 20 30 - • • ' .~ : I. ~.,.; ~ ·~ .\..,,;; ...... ~ ... ~."""""ii~ t. ...,..t;_>C· Figure 2. Officer Personnel Strength Posture OFF WO TOTAL 174 66th Ml. Brigade 101 73 470th Ml Brigade 77 28 105 500th Ml Brigade 35 16 51 501 st Ml Brigade 109 31 40 513th Ml Brigade 118 68 180 50 701 st Ml Brigade 33 17 703d Ml Brigade 46 15 61 704th Ml Brigade 142 58 200 209 902d Ml Group 118 91 Central Security Facility 3 0 3 Cryptologic Support Group 3 4 7 Foreign Cl Activity 6 1 7 Foreign Intelligence Activity 47 13 60 Field Support Center 2 1 3 Field Station Sinop 20 8 28 Foreign Science and Tech Ctr 24 0 24 Intel! Tmg and Anal Ctr 32 23 55 103 Ml Battalion (LI) 40 63 National Security Agency 44 0 44 3 11 SAA 8 Special Security Group 19 1 20 USA Russian Institute 8 1 9 166 HQ INSCOM 135 _fil. 1605 TOTAL 1170 435 21 31 ,/' . ' \ ,_ - ,.l.t •·'!~f-::-1'>\c. r ~ : ~ -· • • 'L ...... ,.-.,_. ·~-· ~:.;: ·-· ___ & .. \. ._J. :.... ~• I: Figure 3. Enlisted Personnel Strength Posture , ..,, 4th Ctr PERCENT 4th Ctr INSCOM DA FY 1991 OF FY 1992 PERCENT PERCENT MOS AUTH/ASG FILL AUTH/ASG OF FILL OF FILL'~ " 33R 2821282 100 49/52 106 90' .. ~- 33T 540/550 102 46/54 117 100, 33V 107/109 102 17/20 118 101: 33Y 7241794 110 2701321 119 89, 33Z 43/42 98 20/12 60 83 968 3113/3211 103 5221470 90 100 960 7721795 103 404/321 80 103 . 96H 162/153 94 49130 61 98 96R 1088/1124 103 58/18 31 97. 978 1509/1520 101 820/591 72 91. 97E 943/985 105 226/203 90 102 97G 379/399 105 135/164 122 95·;· 98C 2539/2907 115 1228/1307 106 114 ... 980 334/417 125 168/271 161 105 98G 361313501 97 807/922 114 102 . ' 98H 1145/1235 108 595/855 144 116 98J 1040/1045 101 437/297 68 .94 98K 930/1189 128 6121755 123 110 98Z 337/311 92 114/111 97 94. Figure 4. Enlisted Personnel Strength Posture by Area and Unit Unit Authorization Assigned European Area 701 st Ml Brigade 770 740 Field Station Berlin 0 20 Field Station Sinop 257 223 USA Cryptologic Spt Group 11 7 66th Ml Brigade 1462 1211 USARl/Foreign Lang Tng Ctr ~ __.1§ TOTAL 2513 2216 Panama Area 470th Ml Brigade/Ml Bn(LI) 1181 1015 TOTAL 1181 1015 22 ·.··. -' l· ~ ;. . . ·: ~- ;. ·.. ~ ~··"'~'-.#ii. ... lllWoi". Pacific Area 703d Ml Brigade 1021 994 500th Ml Brigade 399 173 501 st Ml Brigade 1095 1122 "''. :- 2515 2289 ,, TOTAL '. ;·' CONUS Area :-\r SAA 80 10 .. Field Spt Center 87 85 Central Security Facility 9 8 704th Ml Brigade 2100 1879 513th Ml Brigade 936 1124 HQ INSCOM 211 220 . ~-. ~ lntell Threat Analysis Ctr 183 144 Foreign Science and Tech 10 6 902d Ml Group 295 389 126 Foreign Intelligence Agency 87 ...... Foreign Cl Agency 36 31 Special Security Group _M 47 TOTAL 4088 4069 INSCOM Consolidated European area 2313 2216 Panama Area 1181 1015 Pacific Area 2515 2289 CONUS Area 4088 4069 TOTAL 10297 9589 EEO Overview Statistics. (U) The following is a brief command overview of USAINSCOM's efforts in eliminating under-representation of women and· minorities in mid- and senior-level positions in the work force. As of 30 September 1992 GS09 GS10 GS11 GS12 GS13 GS14 GS1& TOTAL 395 White Women 68 1 71 162 65 26 2 55 Black Men 11 0 8 24 10 1 1 54 Black Women 20 0 11 17 6 0 0 26 Hispanic Men 1 0 2 14 5 2 2 7 Hispanic Women 2 0 3 2 0 0 0 48 AA/Pl Men 9 0 11 16 5 5 2 25 AA/Pl Women 0 7 13 4 1 0 0 3 Al/Al Men 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 Al/Al Women 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 33 ./ I '.~ :·"'""'tt1 tr:~-~~ .. "r I u~\;u1J~uu ~L As of 30 September 1992 GS09 GS10 GS11 GS12 GS13 GS14 GS1fi TOTAL White Women 43 0 65 87 25 6 0 183 e BlackMen 12 0 11 20 6 1 0 50 Black Women 16 0 12 9 2 0 0 39 Hispanic Men 1 0 4 6 2 1 D 13 Hispanic Women 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 8 AA/PIMen 2 0 12 10 4 2 0 30 AA/Pl Women 8 0 6 2 0 0 0 16 Al/AIMen 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Al/Al Women 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 Manage Civilians to Budget CMCB). (U) Manage Civilians to Budget (MCB) continued to be mandated during FY 1992. With the implementation of the monthly MCB report, the ''fencing" of civilian pay, HQ INSCOM was able to closely monitor all excess civilian pay funds. As these funds were generated each month, all excess was immediately withdrawn and reallocated as needed within the command. Based on the hiring freeze and closure of FS Berlin, this headquarters generated approximately $5 million in hirelag funds. U.S. Anny Russian Institute (USARI) Program Budget Change. (U) USARI was projected to transfer to TRADOC in FY 1993. In FY 1992, HODA reversed the decision that USARI should be resourced under Program 8 (training) versus Program 2 (tactical). Starting in FY 1993, INSCOM will receive PB for USARI. INSCOM OMA Funding Program. (U) lNSCOM's OMA funding program at the close of FY 1992 consisted of $319,802.00 in Direct Funds and $0 Funded Reimbursements for a total of $319,802.00. Direct Funding by Sub-Program. (U) The following table provides direct funding by sub-program at the close of FY 1992: Sub Program P2 General Purpose $ 60,834 P38 Intelligence Activities 255,013 P39 Communications Security 947 P7 Supply 30 P81 Military Training 1,754 P87 Civilian Training 374 pg Admin (incl GSA Lease) 850 TOTAL $319,802 Annual Funding Program (AFP). (U) The following is an audit trail from DA Dollar Guidance used for preparation of the FY 1992 Command Operating Budget (COB) to final FY 1992 Annual Funding Program (AFP): 24 ,. . "' ...... --~ .- --.-·--.:. -· - . ·. :.:.. ·•'- ~-~- ...... ,;. ....iEa; .. ~L:· Proqram2 FY 1992 COB Dollar Guidance $ 50, 174 e JTF.. B 55 AIA 2,610 KISS 101 29th "'.' Panama 359 Foreign Currency (753) Congressional Reduction - ADP (203) Congressional Reduction - DBOF (159) Congressional Reduction - Travel (550) TEN CAP 394 Pay Raise 195 Inflation 1,511 Desert Shield 285 Counter Drug (ARL) 2,500 Garmisch Facilities 221 DLR 2,200 66th Relocation 2,600 JCS (410) Intelligence Programs 94 Hurricane Andrew 10 HODA Withdrawal (200) FY 1992 FINAL AFP $ 60,834 Program 38 FY 1992 COB Dollar Guidance $193,225 AIA Transfer 94,528 CANAL PILOT Transfer 2,275 Transfer to TRADOC (391) KISS Transfer 3,216 SSO Reallocation (154) Classified Unit Spaces 440 AIA Postal Shortfall 150 FCFA REVALUATION (1, 787) DCSINT (USAREUR Travel) (50) 470th Augmentees 82 Crazyhorse (139) HOS Management Reduction (620) Travel Reduction (308) Inflation Reduction (196) MSIC Transfer to DIA (30,736) Production Reduction (3,538) TECRAS-MASINT Database (700) FSTC Replacement Facility (716) 25 3S- ' .. , ...... l ...... ::- ...... ,_,;;.;.,;-:-· _. • ·- r, - ; ., - .... , .. _ ...... ,.,._,. ..,_, .. .~- 600 .. DLR :o·,: -·.'. 66th Relocation 2,300 .···::. ~ .. ·. ' FY 1992 Recession Bill (7,670) .. '··'·' .• DESERT STORM 1,150 <~ ;_;:. TSCM Equipment 4,491 (571) -···· AMC _·;.;:- Hurricane Andrew Supplement 62 SAP 70 FY 1992 FINAL AFP $255,013 .· ...... Program39 FY 92 COB Dollar Guidance $ 564 Strategic 223 Autovon 200 HQ Reduction (68) .• ··-. (6) .. Travel ; ·: Inflation 16 Pay Raise 18 .. FY 1992 FINAL AFP $ 947 ...... Program 72 FY 92 COB Dollar Guidance $ 154 Inflation 6 e HODA Withdrawal (130) FY 1992 FINALAFP $ 30 Program 81 FY 1992 COB Dollar Guidance $ 1,408 AIA 61 ROTC Coop Program 225 DIA Intel Course 94 Foreign Currency (38) Inflation 54 HODA Withdrawal (50) FY 1992 FINAL AFP $ 1,754. Program 87 FY 1992 COB Dollar Guidance $ 0 Interns 624 Inflation 24 ACTEDS (24) HODA Withdrawal (250) FY 1992 FINAL AFP $ 374 26 : . .,; . . . ~;; l ~ -\.- ~ ~.'" ·.._,. ~· ~;,. t ~ 4 Program95 FY 1992 COB Dollar Guidance .$ 766 ~/ - :~: •' -: .. AIA 54 QRIP/PECIP (1) Inflation 31 FY 1992 FINAL AFP $ 850 Direct Obligations by Element of Resource fEORl for FY 1992. (U) The··, following reflects direct obligations by Element of Resource (EOR) for FY 1992. Obligations of $319, 158,900 and an Annual Funding Program of $319,802,000 resulted in an obligation rate of 99.8 percent. · EOR P2 P38 P39 P7 PB1 P87 fl. TOTAL Civ Pay 5,007 126,460 502 1 69 292 0 132,331 TVL 6,780 18,501 166 8 1,196 . 67 0 26,718 . Tff 351 1,079 0 18 0 0 734 1,448.· Rt/Co/Ut 1,192 4,892 35 0 0 0 6 6,~53 Ctr Svc 31,990 80,556 172 3 462 10 109 113, 199 Sup/Eq 14,676 17,666 72 0 8 0 0 32,531 FNIH 407 5,584 0 0 0 0 0 5,991 Land/Str 23 0 0 0 1 0 0 24 Printing ~ ~ _Q ..Q _Q _Q _Q ~· TOTAL 60,452 254,776 947 30 1,736 369 849 319,159 Productivity Capital Investment Program (PCIP). (U) The Productivity Capital Investment Program (PCIP) available funding for FY 1992 was $18,891K (FY 1990-$1,023K, FY 1991-$40K). DA withdrew most of INSCOM's AFP for FY 1991 PCIP OPA to fund higher priority requirements, reducing FY 1991 AFP to $40K. During FY 1992, DA restored $400K of FY 1991 OPA to INSCOM FY 1992 AFP. Additionally, INSCOM received $1,491K of FY 1992 OPA funds. At end of fiscal year, $1,825K was committed (97 percent) and $605K was obligated {32 percent). These funds remain available for obligation during FY 1993. . RDT&E Funding. {U) For FY 1992, Congress approved the transfer of OPA and RDT&E funding for the Scientific and Technical Intelligence (S&TI) and HUMINT programs from Army to DIA. The total FY 1992 procurement funds allocated to INSCOM by DIA was $11,842K. At the end of the fiscal year, . $11,315K was committed {96 percent) and $2,850K was obligated (24 percent). (U) Total RDT&E allocated to INSCOM by DIA for S&TI and HUMINT program was $4,010K. At end of fiscal year, $3,517Kwas committed (88 percent) and $2,712K was obligated (68 percent). 27 3') (U) The Foreign Materiel Program (FMP) transferred to INSCOM in FY 1992 from AIA. The total RDT&E funding for this program was $27,501 K. At end of fiscal year, $27,501 K was committed (100 percent) and $25,477K was obligated (93 percent). (U) The Aequisition Security Protection Program (ASPP) one-time RDT&E start up funding of $6.0M was received in FY 1992. At end of fiscal year, $3, 135K was committed and obligated (52 percent). Consolidated Cryptologic Program (CCP). (U) The Consolidated Cryptologic Program (CCP) procurement available funding in FY 1992 was $1,579K (FY 1990-$1, 165K, FY 1991-$1,085K). Items associated with these dollars were approved by NSA. At the end of fiscal year, $1, 199K was committed (70 percent) and $1, 101 K was obligated (60 percent). (U} The General Defense Intelligence Program (GDIP) available procurement funding in FY 1992 was $12,336K (FY 1990-$1,308K, FY 1991-$4,905K). At end of fiscal year, $9,296K was committed (75 percent) and $2,644K was obligated (21 percent). (U) The Foreign Counterintelligence (FCI) and Security and Investigative Activities (S&IA) FY 1992 procurement funds were $1, 191K (FY 1990-$1,787K, FY 1991-$1,567K}. At end of fiscal year, $682K was committed (57 percent} and $616K was obligated (52 percent). Civilian Pay Obligations. (U) The INSCOM FY 1992 anticipated Civilian Pay obligations were $243M. The final civilian pay obligations were $13M. $SM of hirelag funds were withdrawn due to the hiring freeze. Intelligence Contingency Fund. (U) The FY 1992 Intelligence Contingency Fund Limitation Level was $8,341 K. Obligations against this limitation totaled $6,216K. Congressional Reduction. (U} During FY 1992, INSCOM was assessed with an additional congressional reduction that was not previously identified. The reduction was identified as "Appropriated and not Authorized." INSCOM's share of this reduction was CCP program $5,900K and GDIP program $1,770K. INSCOM Investment Strategy Task Force. (U) DCSRM is a primary participant in the INSCOM Investment Strategy Task Force. Under DCSOPS direction, the task force is conducting assumption based planning to develop prioritized mission lists by program. DCSRM has developed detailed resource profiles. Results of the Investment Strategy will be incorporated in the Commander's Planning Guidance and will be used by MSC Commanders and 28 HQ INSCOM Staff to develop input for The INSCOM Plan (TIP) and the FY 1996-2001 program submission. The prioritized mis~ion lists will serve as the ·basis for the identification of unit and HQ INSCOM Statements of Need (SON). Defense Business Operating Fund (DBOF). (U) Defense Business Operating Fund (DBOF) went into effect on 1 October 1991. The portion that affects INSCOM is General and Administrative (G&A) Reimbursement. G&A is projected to be implemented in FY 1994 (CONUS only). HODA conducted a G&A Reimbursement data call during the months of August and September 1992. MACOM's with installations were required to collect data from its tenants and consolidate it for forwarding to HODA on 15 September 1992. INSCOM's requirements were to provide the host the total authorized military and civilian strength, unit identification code, and square footage of property owned or occupied. HQDA is planning to provide each MACOM its portion of the G&A Reimbursement data. The data will identify funding levels for items previously provided on a nonreimbursable basis. Stock Fund Depot Level Reparables (SFDLR) Program. (U) The Stock Fund Depot Level Reparables (SF DLR) Program resulted from an Office of the Secretary of Defense initiative to introduce new efficiencies into the Department of Defense operations. Army implementation of the program on 1 April 1992 transitions high dollar repair parts/assemblies which were previously coded as Procurement Appropriations, Army Secondary (PAA-2) funded, into the Army Stock Fund (ASF) System. Total stock funding of the Class IX Repair Part Supply System now requires unit commanders to budget for and fund all demands placed upon the supply System utilizing allocated Operation and Maintenance, Army (OMA) Funds, regardless of unit cost. HODA implemented an SFDLR Withdrawal Credit Program to fund all requisitions for PAA-2 that were still valid requisitions but the units had not received them prior to 1 April 1992. (U) The purpose for the SFDLR withdrawal credits was to prevent financial hardship on the MACOM's. HODA-had $325K for withdrawal credits and INSCOM received $4.2K. INSCOM returned $3.2K to HODA The reason for the turn-in was EUSA, Korea, decided to fund withdrawal credits for all their stovepipe organizations. EUSA made the decision to do this without counsel with the 501 st Ml Brigade. The 501 st Ml Brigade is the largest portion of INSCOM's SFDLR requirement. Also, Sinop did not need its withdrawal credit because of the decision to close it in FY 1992. INSCOM FY 1992 SFDLR Withdrawal Credits $4.2K Returned to HODA 3.2K TOTAL Withdrawal Credit Usage (P2&P3) $1.0K 29 ,r \ ------(U) DCSLOG estimated INSCOM's 6-month SFDLR requirements to be $8.9K(P2) and $3.8K(P3). DCSLOG based its estimate on FY 1990 SFDLR demand history and a 50 percent retum credit allowance. Initial SFDLR funding was P2, $1.7K An Optempo/Training Resource Model (TRM) was used to determine SFDLR funding for P2. HODA used a non-INSCOM Optempo/TRM. to derive the $1.7K figure for INSCOM. INSCOM worked with CACI (HQDA contractor for TRM} to develop a TRM unique to INSCOM. INSCOM submitted an UFR for $7.2K(P2) to HODA and received $4.SK At end of fiscal year, .· INSCOM returned $700K to HODA DCSLOG determined the low SFDLR requirement was caused by systematic procedural glitches in the Anny Standard Supply System that preclude visibility of INSCOM sustainment data for both standard and nonstandard Class IC repair parts. SFDLR Initial P2 Funding $1.7K Additional Funds from HODA 4.5K TOTAL FY 1992 SFDLR Funding $5.2K Year-end Tum-in 0.7K TOTAL FY 1992 SFDLR Expenditure (P2&P3) $4.SK Command Unit Documentation. (U) As of 30September1992, there were 46 TDA's, 29 TOA Augmentations, 31 MTOE's and 24 Mobilization TDA's in the e. organizational structure of INSCOM. Memorandum of Understanding/Agreement (MOU/MOA) Program. (U} At the end of the fiscal year, there were 306 MOU/MOA's in the active files and 28 MOU/MOA's in the inactive files. During the reporting period, assistance was provided to staff elements in processing 32 new or revised MOU/MOA's. Plans are underway to revised USAINSCOM Regulation 1-7. 30 ' ~- ,,..,~ J:...... ~j,,: ~· . ~ \ .. ~· < :: •. ::::I . .. !' ~ . : ~ • : t ... 1 . r .: ~-.o;A- ~«"-'~~~~~.....,, •s -~ Productivity Capital Investment Program (PCIP). (U) This program invol~es identifying areas for investment which will yield a higher productivity return~;::_•.·· During FY 1992, 29 potential initiatives for a total of $3.633M were considered. · · Twelve projects were approved utilizing $1.936M of the $2M on hand. · ' " ·-·~ INSCOM Program and Budget Guidance. (U) The manpower data shown· in · the following table depicts the authorized level for FY 1993, as a allocated'in .. the ' DA Program and Budget Guidance May 1992 and includes transfers in/ouL ·. · · AUTHORIZED STRENGTH '. Program OFF WO ENL MIL USCIV FNCIV TOTAL P2 Gen Purpose 509 285 4268 5062 123 6 . 5091 Forces P3 Intel & Info 960 429 4616 6005 2730 314 9049 Management P7 Cen Sup & Mgt 0 0 0 0 0 0 ., 0 PB Training 12 4 18 34 20 6 60 P6 RDT&E 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 P3 Spt to NSA 148 29 1171 1348 _Q __Q 1348 TOTAL 1629 747 10073 12449 2881 326 15656 Organizations and Functions Program. (U) This program ensures that · INSCOM, as well as its subordinate units and activities maintain current organizations and functions regulations. The INSCOM mission and responsibilities are contained in AR 10-87, MACOM's in CONUS, Chapter 8. Chapter B was completely rewritten and concurred by the HQ staff. The revised Chapter 8 was transmitted for staffing and publication through the DCSINT to HODA. In addition, seven Organization and Functions regulations of subordinate units have been staff during FY 1992. Two regulations (10-5, 704th Ml Brigade and 10-52, 501st Ml Brigade) have been published. Organization & Functions Regs · Unit Status Regulation 10-2 HQ INSCOM In process Regulation 10-25 Crypt Spt Gp In process Regulation 10-44 FIA In process Regulation 10-50 902d Ml Brigade In process Regulation 10-52 501 st Ml Brigade Published Regulation 10-55 USARI In process Automation OMA Funds. (U) The automation budget for FY 1992 OMA funds was $6.SM and a total of 99.98 percent of those programmed funds were obligated. Travel funds were also increased during FY 1992 to support extended travel requirements for the Command Inspection Program. 31 L/-J . ,·.-.. / . Michelangelo Computer Virus. (U) When the warning was issued that the well publicized Michelangelo computer virus would attack computer systems, worldwide, on 6 March 1992, a maximum effort was undertaken to saturate INSCOM units with virus detection software. As a result of this effort, not one INSCOM system was affected by this virus. DOD Intelligence Information System CDODllS). (U) In January 1992, USAINSCOM assumed responsibility to represent the Army on the DOD Intelligence Information System (DODllS) Engineering Review Board. This duty had previously been performed by personnel from HODA (DAMI-AM) at the Pentagon. Due to defense drawdowns the DAMI-AM mission was split. The policy and planning would remain at DAMI-AM and the Operations and execution would transfer to USAINSCOM in FY 1993. GDIP Budget Cut Drill. (U) During August 1992, the ADCSIM-AUT submitted documentation to the DCSRM identifying reductions/impact for the FY 1993 GDIP Appropriated/Not Authorized Reductions totaling $5.370M ($2.2M in ADP 381335) and for the Unallocated Base Reductions totaling $7M ($1.680M in ADP 381335). Both papers were written to document reduction to the Army central Intelligence Data Handling System (IDHS). Army Intelligence Agency (AIA) Residual Spaces. (U) As a result of the transitioning of AIA into USAINSCOM during the fiscal year, several residual spaces were identified for reallocation. During June 1992, the ADCSIM-AUT furnished justification to the DCSRM for a total of three spaces consisting of a Systems Integration Management Officer (SIMO), and two ADP Security Officers. These additional spaces were necessitated to support the expanded automation requirements of the Intelligence Production Management Agency (IPMA), Intelligence Threat Analysis Center (ITAC), and the Foreign Science and Technology Center (FSTC). Military Interdepartmental Purchase Requests (MIPR's). (U) During FY 1992, 32 MIPR's in the amount of $3, 105,44.00 were processed through the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), hereafter to be referred to as the "agency," in support of Project ODIN (On-Line Data Intelligence Network) within HQ INSCOM. This project life cycle replaced all antiquated automatic data processing equipment with a total of 439 386 PC's, eight 486 PC's 127 Laser Printers, 95 Dot Matrix Printers, 30 Servers, and 32 Lan Printers to prepare HQ, INSCOM for a Local Area Network environment. Automation Requirements Checklist Submissions. (U) During FY 1992, there were 90 approval letters submitted against Automation Requirements Checklists for a total of $12, 742,193.00. 32 . ''·'· .. -.. Managing Civilians to Budget (MCB). (U) FY 1992 was the first full year of operations under the HQDA Program of Managing Civilians to Budget (MCB). The FY 1992 budget for that aspect was $2,712,000.00 to support approximately 65 personnel over the period. Mail Processing. {U) The volume of incoming and outgoing unclassified facsimile transmissions increased dramatically during FY 1992. This surge created a physical strain on the two machines currently used in the Mail & Distribution Section. Action is being taken to replace the existing machines with two new high volume facsimile machines that have substantially more memory and the added capability to both receive and transmit documents simultaneously. The new machines, designed to efficiently handle more fax transmission, will allow mailroom personnel to increase productivity and improve fax service for HQ INSCOM. (U) Mail Processing (FY 1992: The breakdown of mail processing categories and quantity of pieces are as follows: Post Office incoming mail 82,304 pieces Post Office outgoing mail 60,563 pieces Registered/Certified incoming mail 4,465 pieces Registered/Certified outgoing mail 3,710 pieces Express Mail outgoing 425 pieces Express Mail incoming 212 pieces UPS incoming 192 pieces Federal Express incoming 112 pieces Federal Express outgoing 28 pieces NSA incoming mail 1, 145 pieces NSA outgoing mail 945 pieces Courier outgoing {classified) 370 pieces Facsimile transmissions - outgoing 49,254 pages Facsimile transmissions - incoming 81,900 pages Impression Count. (U) The total printing impressions produced in the HQ INSCOM Reproduction Facility during FY 1992 was $,698,286. Total production, captured from both high speed electrostatic and offset printing processes, was generated from 2,256 jobs with 198, 798 masters Inspector General Action Request {IGAR}. (U) During FY 1992, this office closed 290 IGAR's, an increase of 22 percent over FY 1991. A total of 319 issues/allegations were addressed in the IGAR's. Of the 319, 288 were assistance issues, 21 were nonsubstantiated complaint allegations and 10 were substantiated allegations. An analysis of assistance cases revealed that the 33 43 vast majority of them could have been resolved by the chain of command, most . ,9 at company level or below. (U) The top IGAR categories were military personnel management (44 percent), finance and accounting (15 percent), personnel conduct (10 percent), · command/management of organizations (6 percent), and health care (5 percent). Top categories reflect a continuing problem with handling personnel actions···· within a geographically dispersed command. Court Martials. (U) During FY 1992, there were a total of 365 Article 1sis issued throughout the command. INSCOM Journal. (U} The Office of Public Affairs published nine issues ofthe INSCOM Journal during FY 1992, to include a special issue-dedicated to the Combined Federal Campaign. The number of pages established per issue of the Journalwas 32 or 36; the average number of pages for the nine issues was 31.6. ..· (U) A new department was added to the INSCOM JoumaJ-Training. Material appearing in the training section deals with education or training in nature; it also applies to the units as a whole and how the units work together and learn together, and the benefits they derive. l(b)(6) e ou las MacArthur Leadershi Award. (U) Captain'------' as selected as the 1992 INSCOM winner of the General Douglas MacArthur Leadership Award. After reviewing the qualifications of 19 highly qualified nominees from INSCOM's major subordinate commaqds, the INSCOM 5 Special Selection Board was impressed by Captain rblC l _ Jaccomplishments. Executive Officer to Brigadier General Patrick Hughes, Commanding General of · the Army Intelligence A enc AIA) and Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff for 5 Intelligence, Captain (U} The General Douglas MacArthur Leadership Award is awarded to a company grade officer in each major Army command who demonstrates the ideals for which General Douglas MacArthur stood-duty, honor, country. They are sponsored by the MacArthur Foundation and are presented in mid-May in the MacArthur Corridor of the Pentagon. Mrs. MacArthur, the general's widow has attended each ceremony in previous years. The awards are traditionally presented by the Chief of Staff of the Army or the vice Chief of Staff of the Army. INSCOM 1991 Keith L. Ware Winners. (U} Results for the 1991 INSCOM Keith L. Ware Journalism Competition have been announced. In each category, 34 ~ r ~r7~ ~ •; :1r.. ~W~*:O. L U ¥~.L.J~;J1j (~-L first place winners are then entered in the Department of the Army-level 199' · Keith L. Ware Print and Broadcast Journalism Competition. This year's ·•·. < INSCOM Keith L. Ware Competition received more entries than previous ye~rs, demonstrating a command-wide commitment to journalism excellence. The. ' winners are as follows: · ·· , : INSCOM Print Journalist of the Year SGTl!bl(Gl IFSA Today (701st Ml Brigade, Augsburg) Large Anny-Funded Papers First Place: Kunia Underground News (703d Ml Brigade, Kunia) Small Anny-Funded Papers First Place: The Dagger (66th Ml Brigade, Munich) News Feature Magazines First Place: INSCOM Journal (Headquarters, INSCOM) News Articles First Place: SGTj Feature Article~b)(s) I First Place: SFO.__'------' The Dagger (66th Ml Brigade, M..,,...,..,.,un,.,._i_ch_._) ___~ 5 Second Place: Dr.l Editorials/Commentaries l(b)(GJ First Place: Chaplain (MAJ) '------' (66th Ml Brigade, Munich) 35 Sports Articles l(b)(S) I First Place: SSG....,. ....,,--.-~---' The Dagger (66th Ml Brigade, Munich). Single or Stand-~pru~b.o.ltographs First Place: SGT (b)(S) Kunia Under round News (703d Ml Brigade, Picture Stories j Feature, News, f'::'(b~){s~>LL.ll..l.L.1.-"'1.....c:..Ll,U First Place: SF er (66th Ml Brigade, Cartoon Art First Place: The Lighter Side, INSCOM Journal (Headquarters, INSCOM) Operation Desert Shield/Storm Field Newspapers First Place: The Mirage-Deplored Tabloid (513th Ml Brigade, Fort Monmouth) Special Achievement (Print Media) First Place: Kunia Underground News (703d Ml Brigade, Kunia) Command Staff Meetings. (U) On 16 August 1993, the Commanding General, USAINSCOM designated the Chief of Staff as the INSCOM Deputy Commander and directed he conduct the weekly staff meeting in that capacity. The meeting would replace the CG staff meeting. In the meantime, the Commanding General would host a limited executive meeting of his own eachweek. Command Entry and Exit Procedures. (U) Effective August 1993, INSCOM entry/exit procedures for the Nolan Building SCIF were amended as follows: a. (U) The 100 percent inspection policy was curtailed, and random security inspection procedures of personal items and property were instituted. b. (U) Random security inspections will be implemented for a 24-hour period at least weekly. The date and time of the inspections will be determined by the Commander, Security Detachment in coordination with the Commander, INSCOM Support Battalion (Provisional). 36 c. (U) During the random inspections, all personnel will be requiredio .. present all items for inspection to include briefcases, folders, boxes, and other-. containers. Personal items of permanent employees, however,· are exempdrom inspection, to include purses, handbags, and gym bags. · :: · :· ;,·,. ' d. (U) When the random inspection is not in effect, permanently cl~~:red personnel with INSCOM security identification badges must show their badge to the Military Police at the front desk before entering or exiting the SCtF: ··. _:: ·.: · e. (U) Sign-in and escort provisions for visitors, non-perrrianerif' . :, contractors and uncleared employees remain in effect Furthermore, these .· personnel are subject to inspection of all badges, packages, briefcases; and . other materials in their possession. f. (U) All individuals requesting to enter or exit the SCIF with property pass items (i.e., electronic devices, unprocessed film, computer disks, etc.) are still subject to 100 percent inspection of those items at all times. "" 701 st Military Intelligence Brigade Discontinuance~ (U) The 701 st Military Intelligence Brigade furled its colors and discontinued in a ceremony on · 12 January 1993. This ceremony preceded final termination of Field Station· Augsburg's national strategic mission on 1 April 1993 by 3 months. The brigade's two remaining battalions, the 711 th Military Intelligence Battalion and the 714th Military Intelligence Battalion will be attached to the 66th Military · Intelligence Brigade staff effective 13 January 1993. · (U) On 15 December 1992, the commanders of the 701 st Military Intelligence Brigade and the 66th Military Intelligence Brigade jointly stood up Task Force Gablingen (TFG). The mission of the Task Force was to complete the drawdown and closure of Field Station Augsburg and transition 701 st Military Intelligence Brigade staff responsibilities and operations facilities to the 66th Military Intelligence Brigade. Primary focus of Task Force efforts will be to act as the single point of contact for all 701st-Military Intelligence Brigade drawdown and closure actions, and logistics and engineering actions related to the transition of the facility to the 66th Military Intelligence Brigade. General Defense Intelligence Program (GDIP}. (U) FY 1993 Congressional actions and Headquarters, Department of the Army reductions have reduced anticipated funding levels by 9 percent or $35M. Most severely impacted were the General Defense Intelligence Program which was reduced $23M or 15 percent and the Security and Investigative Activities Program which was reduced by $8M or 19 percent. 37 L/1 (U) Program affected within the GDIP are ADP Support $13M, EUCOM $4M, HUMINT and TECRAS collection $2M, and Production $4M. Of major significance is the effect on INSCOM's production capability. Decrements have reduced ADP support to production by 90 percent. In addition, dollars remaining for production requirements cover infrastructure requirements only; e.g., civilian pay for filled positions. (U) An analysis of INSCOM revised funding levels was accomplished in late November 1992. A critical unfinanced requirement of $6M was identified to continue minimum level of operations for delegated production requirements at FSTC and ITAC. In order to fund this requirement, a transfer of $3.SM from CCP funding to GDIP was required. ·(U} In addition to the dollar reductions, INSCOM has been directed to reduce GDIP and CCP civilian authorizations by 171.5 percent by FY 1997. Within the GDIP program, 46 spaces in these reductions are to be implemented in FY 1993 due to existing vacancies. Civilian pay dollars in the amount of $2M were withdrawn. (U) A travel reduction of $1.575 was assessed across all programs. (U) The bottom line is that FY 1993 decrements have had a devastating effect on INSCOM's ability to provide delegated production support and to conduct collection requirements worldwide. Even though resources are declining, taskings continue. Funds in the amount of $3.BM have been reprogrammed from the CCP to GDIP to cover delegated production minimum essential requirements. Veterans Day Retreat Ceremony. (U) In respect for military veterans, INSCOM sponsored its annual Veterans ~av Retreat Ceremony on 6 November 1992. The guest speaker was COL (Ret) (b)(6) ~ World War II, prisoner• of war. Korean War veteran, and civil servant. Adopt-A-School Partnership Armv Mentoring and Tutoring Program. (U) On 18 April 1992, the President of the United States announced a bold, comprehensive, long-range education plan and strategy to move every community in America toward the National Education Goals. The National Education Goals consists of six goals designed to help our country be competitive in the world economy. The Secretary of the Army has endorsed this plan and has advised each military community to expand ongoing educational initiatives into a full-fledged mentoring and tutoring program to confront the serious educational challenges our country faces. 38 >~· ···:~:~ f r111 ~·r~r · ' i : · : :. L _~ t ~ :.·~- ;. . ~ :- u ~-\..::--....,,.. ·i.·_.- ~~ : '-&...l.-.i tutoring held. The school is the Markham Elementary School at Fort Belvoir, and its student body is comprised totally of military dependents. Furthermore, it is identified by the Virginia Office of Research and Evaluation as a "special needs" school. (U} INSCOM personnel, both military and civilian, were encouraged to participate in the program. Supervisors were encouraged to approve annual leave for the civilian employees who participated in the program. National Intelligence Meritorious Unit Citation Intelligence Community Awards. (U) The following INSCOM units were presented on 23 September 1992 with the National Intelligence Meritorious Unit Citation Award from the Director, Central Intelligence Agency: 66th Military Intelligence Brigade; Foreign Materiel Intelligence Battalion; U.S. Army Operational Group, INSCOM; Combined Analysis Detachment-Berlin; and the 202d Military Intelligence Battalion, 513th Military Intelligence Brigade. 17th Annual Army Intelligence Ball. {U} The 17th Annual Army Intelligence Ball was coordinated by the DCSOPS and hosted on 3 October 1992 at the Radisson Mark Plaza Hotel, Alexandria, Virginia. Vint Hill Farms Station Golden Anniversarv. (U} The U.S. Army Vint Hill Farms Station. Warrenton, Virginia, celebrated its 50th anniversary during the weekend of 12 June 1992 in celebration of its Organizational Day. The USAINSCOM Command History Office participated in this event by assisting in the construction of a historical display. Military Intelligence Branch quarterly Newsletter. (U) The newsletter is published by the Military Intelligence Branch at DA PERSCOM to offer valuable information on current issues and provide general professional development guidance currently impacting the Ml Officer Corps. Since budge constraints prohibit the Ml Branch at DA PERSCOM from publishing Ml Career Notes More than once a year, the newsletter is provided to fill the gaps. INSCOM Mission. (U} As in each year, INSCOM announces its missio~ for the upcoming year. The mission for 1992 was to conduct multidiscipline intelligence security, production, and electronic warfare operations with the top 10 objectives to: {1} {U) Maintain the edge: conduct global multidiscipline intelligence operations. (2) (U) Care for INSCOM people. 39 . . . ··-. ~.....: ~ j_ • ~. ~- .. ; : : r- ~ · i k '- ;.&.;~-,·~ ·,,.; ~ .. l:~i>"" (3) (U) Refine European, Pacific, CONUS, and power projection force ·.. · structures. ," ~ ~. - . (4) (U) Evaluate concept for EAC intelligence support to Corps (C~l$E). (5) (U) Integrate U.S. Army Reserve Component Forces into EAC·· ·· intelligence operations. - (6) (U) Implement a Non-Development Item (NOi) INSCOM Acqui$ition Program. (7) (U) Develop a command-wide information Mission area architecture for compatibility/interoperability between HQ INSCOM and its MSC's. (8} (U) Support the U.S. Army Drug Strategy and Initiate a command-:- wide counter-drug campaign plan. (9) (U} Transition intelligence production into INSCOM's policy, plans, and operations. (10) (U) Focus on MSC training and readiness. CFC Kick-Off. (U} The INSCOM CFC kick-off took place on 8 October 1991 at the USAINSCOM Headquarters, Nolan Building. , Discontinuance of U.S. Army Intelligence Agency (AIA}. (U) The AIA was reassigned to the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command on 1 October 1991, and discontinued on 1 April 1992. Transfer of U.S. Anny Foreign Language Training Center Europe. {U) The U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command was ordered to transfer its functional proponency of our organization from the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command to the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command on 1 October 1992. Travis Trophy Awards. (U) On 15 May 1992, the worldwide awards presented by the National Security Agency was conducted. For the Fiscal Year 1991, the Travis Trophy Award was presented to the Army nominee, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, 701 st Military Intelligence Brigade, 40 :;o (b)(6) I . . Augsburg, Germany, under the unit command of COL..._l ______ju .•s.: ·. Army. (U) The Director's Trophy Award was presented to the air force nominee; :_, • 6975th Electronic Securit S uadron, Riyadh Air Base, Saudi Arabia, underthe unit command of COL (bJ(Sl .S. Air Force. '·· Top quality Management CTQM). (U) On 10 June 1992, the USAINScoM.:? Commander approved a plan to implement TOM throughout INS COM. The "first step of the plan was to establish the Executive Steering Council and have the council members attend a two-day seminar. During this seminar, council;;· .. members would gain an understanding of TOM, as it applies to INSCOM, and develop a "vision" for the future of the organization. (U) The Executive Steering Council included the Chief of Staff and each Deputy. Chief of Staff, the Commander Sergeant Major, and was chaired by the · commanding general. (U) The commanding general wrote a letter to all staff heads in August 1992 stating that implementation of TOM involves commitment at all levels in the organization. The commitment must be real and must define a set of values. and priorities that support a pattern of positive action. TOM strategy requires top management's commitment and leadership as a major productivity · enhancement. By providing continuous involvement and emphasizing quality and training, personnel are encouraged and provided the environment to. • respond in a trusting, creative, and innovative manner. Motivated personnel are productive personnel. (U) Following the Executive Training Seminar, courses of instruction were scheduled for the Quality Management Board which included the deputies of each staff element and division chiefs. 50th Anniversarv of World War II Commemoration Committee. (U) The command began its participation in the commemoration of World War II by supporting Vint Hill Farms Station, Warrenton, Virginia, in recognition of its 50th Anniversary. Plans were also underway for displays to be mounted throughout the Nolan Building and WWII veterans to be honored during the headquarters' Organizational Day festivities in·FY 1993. 41 51 ChapterV OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES Multidiscipline Top Ten Objectives for 1992. (U) During the course of the reporting period, the INSCOM Command Group determined that the following items were to be considered as INSCOM's top priorities for the 1992 Calendar Year: (U) Maintain the Edge: Conduct Global Multidiscipline Intelligence Operations. (U) Care for INSCOM People. (U) Refine European, Pacific, CONUS, and Power Projection Force Structures. (U) Evaluate Concept for EAC Intelligence Support to Corps {CMISE). (U) Integrate U.S. Army Reserve Component Forces into EAC Intelligence Operations. {U) Implement a Non-Development Item (NOi) INSCOM Acquisition Program. (U) Develop a Command-Wide Information Mission Area Architecture for Compatibility/Interoperability between HQ INSCOM and its MSC's {Major Subordinate Commands). (U) Support the U.S. Army Drug Strategy and Initiate a Command-Wide Counter Drug Campaign Plan. (U) Transition Intelligence Production into INSCOM's Policy, Plans, and Operations. U Focus on MSC Training and Readiness. (b)(1) 42 ,- .... ~- - ',.. ... I t~ .... -•-O.· ...,.., . ' . "' ... ·- ~ - (b}(1} INSCOM Joint Intelligence Center (JIC) Augmentation. (U) On 15 March 1991, the Secretary of Defense approved a plan ta restructure defense intelligence by consolidating all intelligence production activities at the unified command level into Joint Intelligence Centers (JIC's). To begin implementation of this plan, INS COM agreed to augment the JIC of U.S. Atlantic Command (LANTCOM) with 21 personnel beginning in FY 1993. (b)(1) Intelligence Field Operating Activities Consolidation/ Resubordination. (U) During the course of the reporting period, the Chief of Staff of the Army approved that a portion of the VANGUARD Study results that called for the consalidation/resubordination of Intelligence Field Operating Activities (FOA) under a major subordinate command of INSCOM. Accordingly, planning began to organize an INSCOM Mission Support Command on 1 October 1992 in the form of a provisional INSCOM Support Battalion (ISB). The new entity would absorb the following Fort Belvair-based INSCOM elements: Force Modernization Activity; Contract Support Activity; Automated Systems Activity; INSCOM Activity Fort Belvoir; and also the Mission Support Activity at Vint Hill Farms Station. Additionally, it would incorporate the functions of the DA DCSINT Intelligence Personnel Management Office and the DA DCSINT Intelligence Automation Management Office. Additionally, various HQ INSCOM elements would be transferred (on paper) to the new MSC, to include the 43 - ,...... ,- 'r - ·- ' .· ' ~· .• _1...,. -, .,· 'i ~ ;,, .i:i ---~-~·- Reserve Affairs, History Office, Chaplains Office, Army Liaison Office, SSO'Fort Belvoir, Audio Visual Information Support Activity, and the Intelligence ··· ... ·' ·. .. 01perat1ons c ent er. ''{. .. (b)(1) (b)(1) (b)(1) (b)(1) :9 44 (b)(1) ! ~ (b)(1) (b)(1 ),(b)(1) Per CIA (b)(1) 45 l(b)(1) (b)(1) (b)(1) (b)(1) (b)(1) 46 .. ·.:~ " . ... , .. Counterintelliaence/Ooerations Securitv (b)(1) (b)(1) (b )( 1) (b)(1) (b)(1) 47 r~~ ~~L~!'.:;.:ea~ ... :~ 1 ro~:1&:J HidiEJl4ALo ------" (b)(1),(b)(1) Per CIA (b)(1) (b)(1} 48 (b)(1) (b)(1) (b)(1) (b)(1) 49 59 (b)(1) Special Security Group (SSGl Decentralization. (U) By 1 October 1991·, · · ·· · Special Security Offices·previously commanded by the SSG hadbeen resubordinated to the MACOM commanders. During the course of the reporting period, ADCSOPS-CI, the Commander, Special Security Group, and DAMI-Cl formed a council to discuss issues arising from the decentralization of SSG ..· · operations and assess those management responsibilities that must be retained to monitor the decentralized system. A survey of major Army command·:,_.:" ... · (MACOM} commanders revealed that decentralization of the Army's Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI} dissemination system was going well.' AUhe . end of the reporting period, the CG, INSCOM had approved downgrading the · rank of the SSG commander from colonel to lieutenant colonel, resubordinating the SSG to the 902d Ml Group, and making changes in the SCI security manual. The first two initiatives were made necessary by lack of support for a colonel's position in the Officer Distribution Plan and by the CG's desire to reduce the number of INSCOM major subordinate commands (MSC's) as the command downsized. The recommended revision of SCI procedures was dictated by the impact of decentralization, force reduction, and changing threats, and by a desire to move away from manpower-intensive procedures and take advantage of the economies and efficiencies allowed by use of automation. (b )( 1} 50 (bj(1) Personnel Security Investigations Acquisition Systems Protection Program (ASPP). (U) During the course of the reporting period, INSCOM was assigned the new mission of providing counterintelligence (Cl) support to the Army portion of the Acquisition Systems Protection Program (ASPP). The ASPP was established at the direction of Congress to protect defense systems and technical data from foreign intelligence collection efforts during the acquisition phase of Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Programs. DOD Instruction 5000.2 which implements the program within DOD, mandates the use of counterintelligence and operational security surveys throughout the life cycle of all acquisition programs. INSCOM is charged with providing Cl support and threat assessments for all Army and some joint assessment programs. (U) To demonstrate the value of the concept, INSCOM decided to focus Cl resources on four key acquisition programs: the Corps Surface to Air Missile (CORPS SAM); the Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System (AFTADS); the Single Channel Anti-Jam Manportable Terminal (SCAMP); and the Secure Mobile Anti-Jam Reliable Tactical Terminal (SMART-T). However, although INSCOM accorded ASPP a high priority, long-term funding remained uncertain. Relocation of Badge and Credentials (B&C} Office. (U) On 3 October 1991, the Military Intelligence Badge and Credentials Office relocated from the 51 Foreign Counterintelligence Activity {FCA) at Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, to HQ INSCOM at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. The move was designed to enhance staff oversight capability, and came in the wake of an inspection report that was critical of FCA's management and resource in the program. During 4th Quarter, FY 1992, a concerted effort was made to automate the B&C program. Some 5,600 entries were loaded into a new database. Communications Security (COMSECl Inspection Mission Transfer. (U) The Army promulgated its new COMSEC regulation, AR 380-40, in November 1990. The AR significantly reduced INSCOM's role in inspecting Army cryptofacilities. Under its provisions, INSCOM would no longer routinely inspect every Army cryptofacility, but confine its efforts to cyclical inspections of the most important or endangered ones. During the course of the reporting period, ADCSOPS-CI recommended that these inspections should be combined with the cryptofacility audits already conducted by U.S. Army Communications-Electronics Command's Communications Security Logistics Activity {CCSLA) and that the entire mission be handed over to CCSLA. Inspections and audits were largely duplicative, and as it stood, CCSLA was auditing 100 percent of the holdings in the Army's 2,150 COMSEC accounts, while INSCOM only looked at 10 percent of the inventory. Consolidation under CCSLA would provide COMSEC custodians with "one stop" shopping and allow the Army to take advantage of CCSLA's automated data base. INSCOM proposed to augment CCSLA's existing staff of four full-time auditors with eight of its own personnel to provide worldwide coverage. In June 1992, INSCOM and the Army Materiel Command agreed to the proposed realignment. On 30 June 1992, DA directed INSCOM to take the lead in drafting a formal Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). · (b)( 1) 52 -· ~~'-.. - . (b)(1) (b)( 1) (b )(1) Technical Surveillance Countermeasures (TSCM) and TEMPEST Issues. (U) During the course of the ·reporting period, INSCOM implemented consolidation of the TSCM and TEMPEST programs in the field. TSCM personnel were cross trained to conduct TEMPEST inspections, and TEMPEST positions were eliminated from the authorization documents. (b)(1) 9· Mobile Tempest Testing System f MTTSl/Mobile TEMPEST Detection . System (MTDS). (U) Initiated in 1979, the effort to develop a Mobile Tempest. Test System (MTIS) to replace obsolescent equipment turned into the original "procurement program from hell," dragging on over a longer timespan than the runs of some television soap operas. In August 1991, the original requirement for 1O MTIS units and transporters was reduced to two by INSCOM. In March 1992, the program was downsized once more. INSCOM decided to acquire one Mobile TEMPEST Detection System (MTDS), as MTIS was now called, and a TEMPEST Detecting Equipment Transporter to haul the electronic:S. When finally ready, the system would be deployed to the 902d Ml Group. It was hoped to furnish the 66th Ml Brigade in Germany and the SOOth Ml Brigade, Hawaii with small "fly-away" mini-MTDS. By the end of the reporting period, the project was at last lurching towards completion. Transfer of TSCM Training. (U) INSCOM was the proponent of Phase II TSCM training, which was conducted at the 902d Ml Group. On 1 March 1990, the INSCOM Chief of Staff proposed to TRADOC that INSCOM also assume responsibility for Phase I training in this area. By collocating all TSCM training in one facility, training costs would be reduced and program management 54 enhanced. After a leisurely process of negotiation, consultation, and. . coordination among all parties, the proposal was accepted. On 21 May 1992, · TRADOC agreed to officially transfer Phase I TSCM training responsibilitie·s· from the U.S. Army Intelligence School, Fort Devens, to the 902d Ml Group at Fort.·· George G. Meade, Maryland, no later than 31 July. The 902d began to teach · both phases of the course on 21 September 1992. .··. INSCOM Polygraph Program. (U) During the course of the reporting per!od, · the command was authorized 90 polygraph examiners. Sixty examiners were on board. The INSCOM Polygraph program continued to labor under constraints imposed by Congressional mandates. Congress annually places a limit on the number of Counterintelligence-Scope (CSP) examinations that the DOD can·' administer each fiscal year. Only personnel assigned to NSA, l (U) By the end of the reporting period, DA had started implementation of the Department of the Army Cryptographic Access Program (DACAP). Since DACAP examinations were exempt from the Congressional ceiling, the command anticipated it would be able to conduct 2,500 examinations annually once DACAP was fully operational. {U) Special problems for the INSCOM Polygraph Program surfaced in Europe during the reporting period when two Air Force officers of flag rank assigned to European Command (EUCOM) were given random CSP polygraph examinations by the 66th Ml Brigade because of their access to an Army Special Activity Program. The assigned examiner's conclusions proved controversial: his assessment that one general's exam indicated no deception was disputed by his colleagues; while the other general's examination he felt was INCONCLUSIVE. Results of the examinations were referred back to INSCOM Quality Control, where they were both evaluated as INCONCLUSIVE and returned to the 66th Ml Brigade for follow-up action. Army investigation of Air Force generals had thus produced a situation that was politically awkward from everybody's viewpoint. (U} After the EUCOM J-2 had discussed the issue with the CG, INSCOM, EUCOM advised the 66th Ml Brigade that the generals would not continue their examinations "because the anomalies contained on their polygrams did not 55 Regraded CONFIDENTIAL on po October 2015 I by USAINSCOM FQl.'PA Auth para H02, DOD 5200· lR / \ warrant a retest." EUCOM had apparently misconstrued INSCOM's position: the cases were returned for rerun precisely because they did warrant a retest, although it could not be determined whether this was caused by examiner error or by the legitimate nature of the responses. However, the generals had met their "CSP obligation," which was all that current Army policy called for. With the exception of NSA, DOD was not allowed to take adverse action based solely on unfavorable polygraph charts. In reviewing the case, DCSOPS was of the opinion that the 66th Ml Brigade had used an examiner of only "average" abilities, and had failed to do a satisfactory job of explaining the program to the EUCOM staff. INSCOM Counterintelligence (Cl) Conference. (U) The 1992 INSCOM Cl conference took place at HQ INSCOM from 3-7 August 1993. Representatives from the FBI, OSD, DA, and the Intelligence Center and School joined personnel from most INSCOM MSC's. Conference goals included providing MSC's with information on Cl successes, force structure planning and constraints, and the various challenges posed by resources, mission priorities, training, and the evolving role of Cl in the Army. Significant issues addressed included the need for better articulation of Cl resource requirements, the requirement for communicating with Cl personnel and advisors in Unified and Specified Commands, the lack of an Army Cl strategy, and the necessity of making tactical commanders more aware of the "value added" by Cl. 56 : } ~ : ,. HUMINT/TAREX .•· ···:. ,_.. HU MINT ...... ·.•. , .. , .. (b)(1) (b)(1) (b)(1),(b)(1) Per CIA 57 ··~iE~~...-·.·~ ·~~.u Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. C8J Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s): (b)(l) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. lX] Other: (b )( 1) Per CIA DELETED P AGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 68-70 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93 Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. ~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s): (b)(l) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. D Other: DELETED P AGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 71-72 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R I Sep 93 TAREX (b) (1) Per NSA,(b)(1),(b)(3):50 use 3024(i),(b)(3):P.L 86-36 (b) ( 1) Per NSA,(b )(1 ),(b )(3):50 USC 3024(i),(b)(3):P .L. 86-36 (b)(1) " 63 13 Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. [:8J Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s): (b)(l) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. lZJ Other: (b )( 1) (b )(3) Per NSA DELETED P AGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 74 IAGP A-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93 ~1r-1~17:::.:.: '',.'" .·. ~··.·.: ,1\:: (b)(1) (b) (1) Per NSA,(b)(1),(b)(1) Per CIA,(b)(3):18 U.S.C. 798,(b)(3):50 USC 3024(i),(b)(3):PL 86-36 (b) (1) Per NSA,(b)(1),(b)(3):18 U.S.C. 798,(b)(3):50 use 3024(i),(b)(3):P.L. 86-36 Gs MANDLE Vt~. eOMlNT CHAMN EL~~ ONL' ·. 7~ . _1 Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. ~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s): (b)(l) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. ~ Other: (b)(l) (b)(3) Per NSA, (b)(l) Per CIA DELETED P AGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 76 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93 Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page(s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. ~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s): (b)(l) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. lZJ Other: (b )( 1) (b )(3) Per NSA DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 77-82 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R I Sep 93 .. ~~·,·_.... r·-1< . ,, ,....., ..... '-1,.._, ..... '····" ,.,, •. c....,.._;. : ·~,,/' .. •·,_ .,._,, • IMINI/MASINT _ (b)(1) (b)(1) (b)(1) ,. ; i ilCLUrSABL: 11::• lt:HtE:l 6fl ~ t ATI 8 MA~ "Jlfl/I"'" · U.S. Army Strategic Imagery Detachment. Pacific fSIDPAC). (U) The U.S. . Army Strategic Imagery Detachment, Pacific (SIDPAC) ofthe 500th Ml Brigade . · provides IMINT support to the Joint Intelligence Center Pacific (JICPAC) at .,~· . Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii. During the course of the reporting perioq;·ttie. : detachment was manned by 9 IN SC OM imagery analysts and some 1O ~l)alysts from U.S. Army Pacific. As a result of the conversion of 500th Ml Brigade,/: .... elements to the L series Table of Organization and Equipment (TOE), the.uni.t . was scheduled to transition to a Strategic Imagery Analysis Detachment on16. · October 1992 with an authorized strength of 43 soldiers, 27 of whom would be analysts. 74 . .;·.,.1:.... .•.·.·...-;•";"'<";.;:; :;sm., Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page(s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. [8J Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s): (b)(l) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. D Other: DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 85 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93 (b )(1) (b)(1) (b)(1) During the course of the reporting period, INSCOM fielded the ·onal and develo mental s stems or families of s stems: 76 Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. [8J Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption( s): (b)(l) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. D Other: DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 87 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93 (b)(1) co <( r- >< cz w D. ~ I gg Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. [8'.] Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s): (b)(l) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. D Other: DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 89-91 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R I Sep 93 () e (b)(1) 82 Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. [8J Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s): (b)(l) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. D Other: DELETED P AGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 93 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93 APPENDIX C (b)(1) 84 Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. ~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s): (b)(l) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. D Other: DELETED P AGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 95 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93 APPENDIX D {b)(1) 86 ._/;·· . .. .,....L· ; . ; .. : ' Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page(s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. ~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s): (b)(l) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. D Other: DELETED P AGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 97-98 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1Sep93 ~• l t,, 89 .l Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. ~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s): (b)(l) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. D Other: DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 100-103 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93 (b)(1) I bLj e- 95 /os Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. ~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s ): (b)(l) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. D Other: DELETED P AGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 106 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1Sep93 CONFIDENTIAL APPENDIX H USAINSCOM KEY PERSONNEL Position/Name Dates Served COMMANDING GENERAL MG Charles F. Scanlon 11 Oct 90 - Present DEPUTY COMMANDING GENERAL BG Michael M. Schneider 18 Mar 91 - Present U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AGENCY BG Patrick M. Hughes *01 Oct 91 - 10 Apr 92 SEN/OR CRYPTOLOGICADVISOR (b)(6) I Mr.l. . Sep 91 - Present COMMr4AITT C:FRGFANTMA 'PR CSM l(b)(G} J 17 Jul 87 - Present CHIEEOFSTAFF CC0 tj''"" 16 Sep 92 - Present 0 y 07 Nov 90 - Aug 92 DEPrTY CHIEF OF STAFF Mr. :}(Gl 07 Nov 90 - Present ASSISTANT DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF Mr.l(b)(Gl I 07 Mar 83 - Present DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF. RESERVE AFFAIRS COL i INTERNAL REVIEW OFFICE Mr. l{b}(G} 01 Apr 84 - Present *Date of AIA transfer to HQ USAINSCOM. REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ONl200ctober2015 I BY USAINSCOM FCHPA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 520CUR 97 CONFIDENTIAL /o/ -··----·- --·------CONFIDENTIAL Position/Name Dates Served U.S. ARMY FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE COMMAND BG Michael M. Schneider 01 Feb 92 - Present SECRrRY OF THE GENERAL STAFF 04 Apr 92 - Present MAJCPT ''"'' I 07 May 90 - 03 Apr 92 PRO TOCA/ Jun 92 - Present Jan 92 - Jun 92 ~~f "" - Jan 92 Ms. PRINCIPAL ADVISOR RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTRACVNG (PARC) Mrj(b)(6J I Jul 87 - Present INTEJ-LIGENCE OVERSIGHT OFFICE 10 Oct 88 - Present M~r~ 1 INSPECTOR GENERAL cou(b)(S) OB Sep 92 - Present 26 Aug 91 - 07 Sep 92 cou~~~~~~~~~~__J STAFF JUDGEADVOCA TE gg~(b)(6) 01 May 92 - Present Jun 88 - 30 Apr 92 OFFlrE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS 01 Sep 92 - Present MAJ (b)(6) I LTC 01 Sep 87 - 31 Aug 92 '--~~~~~~--1 COMA1fiND CHAPLAIN COL[bJ(SJ 20 Jul 89 - Present ~~~~~~~~__] DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, PERSONNEL 01 Oct 91 - Present ggtl''"'' I 24 Jul 89 - 30 Sep 91 REG C SS IED ON 20 October 2015 BYUSAINSCOM FOIPA 98 Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200.lR CONFIDENTIAL /oC! CONFffiEN11AL Position/Name Dates Served USAINSCOM TRAINING DOCTRINE SUPPORT DETACHMENT fTRADSJ COL .....l(b-)(6_> ______, 01 Oct 92 - Present OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS MAJ (b)(6J 01 Sep 92 - Present LTC.______---' 01 Sep 87 - 31 AUQ 92 COM'¥ft'AND CHAPLAIN 5 COL(bl< > 20 Jul 89 - Present '------' DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF. PERSONNEL 01 Oct 91 - Present gg~'"'" I 24 Jul 89 - 30 Sep 91 DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, INFORMATION MAN.4GFMFAIT CO Lr Jes> 01 Jun 89 - Present '------' DEP'~lTY CHIEF OF STAFF OPERAr10NS co (b)(6} 14 Aug 92 - Present co 16 Aug 90-13 Aug 92 ~------~ DEP~ITY CH/FF OF STAFF tOGIST/CS co (b)(6) 31 Aug 92 - Present co ...______, 10 Apr 89-30 Aug 92 DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, RESOURCE MANf DEPUTY CHIF=F OF STAFF SFCI ('RITY coLF~_> DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, CONTRACTING/PARC Mr.l REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ONl20 October2015 I BY USAINSCOM FOIPA Auth Pam 4-102 DOD 5200.lR 99 CONFIDENTIAL !o7 C9NFIDENFIAL Unit/Commander 66/h MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BRIGADE (EAC) I 28 Jul 92 - Present gg~(b)(6) 27 Jul 90 - 27 Jul 92 470/h MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BRIGADE (EAC) coy(b)(6) I 17 Jul 91 - Present 500/h Mii ITARYLNTELLIGENCEBRIGADE (EAC) 28 Jul 92 - Present ggf''' I 19 Jul 90-27 Jul 92 500/h MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BRIGADE, HAWA~t~t.,...-~~~~~~~~ coLj~(b-)(6-)~~~~~~~~_J 07 Jul 91 - Present 501st MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BRIGADE (EAC) Aug 92 - Present ggtl''"" I 14 Jun 90 -Aug 92 513/h MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BRIGADE (EAC) 28 Aug 92 - Present gg~~~ I 12 Sep 90 - 27 Aug 92 701 s\ Mll. llAflY INTELLIGENCE BRIGADE co~(b)(6) I Jun 91 - Present 703d Mil tTAR'r. INLEl l /GENGE BflGADE coy~(b-)(6-)~~~~~~~~~J 09 Jul 91 - Present 704/h MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BRIGADE gg~(b)(6) I 20 Jun 92 - Present 20 Jun 90 -19 Jun 92 902d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP Jun 92 - Present gg~''"'' I Dec 89 - Jun 92 RE'rl!., ~:.J.Lll~~:.u:..u.., ON 20 October 2015 BY USAINSCOM OJ PA Auth Pam 4-102 DOD 5200.IR 100 CONFIDENTh\L J JD CONFffiEN11A:L Unit/Commander Dates Served US. ljRMY EdREIGN. INTELL/.G.ENCE ACTIVITY coL(b)(e} I 14 Jun 90 - Present U~.·.1 BM.YSPECIAL SECURITY GROUP . /) f~(b)(6} r·-----L,.._,..,,, ,.. --·\r.-·" 1 ©·-JUl18g~_~- u.s. ARMY CRYPTOLOGIC SUPPORT GROUP 15 Jul 91 - Present · COL l(b)(6) I USAINSCOM FOREIGN MATERIEL INTELLIGENCE GROftWsi 16 Aug 91 - Present LTC _ '----~~~~~~___] U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY 'PROVISIONAL COL 16 Jan 92 - Closure 25 Jul 90-15 Jan 92 US. ~RMYE/ELDSTATIONSINOP 25 Jun 92 ·- Present gg (bXO) I 22 Jun 91 - 24 Jun 92 3d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (AERrl EXPLOITATION) LTC (b)(6) I Jun 91 - Present 18th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BA ITAL/ON (INTG!EXPL E4C LTC (b)(eJ 26 Jun 92 - Present 22 Jun 90 - 25 Jun 92 LTC REClRADED !INCi ASS!FIFD oN120 October 2015 I BY USAINSCOM FOIPA Auth Para 4-102 OOD 5200. IR 101 CONFIDENFIAL J I I Unit/Commander Dates Served 201sl MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (SIG/NT) (EAC) LTC l(bl(6l 13 Jul 92 - Present 28 Sep 90 - 12 Jul 92 LTC ,______J · 202d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (IN7i1 & EXPLJ fEACJ LTC (b)(Sl 19 Mar 92 - Present LTC 28 Sep 90 -18 Mar 92 ~------_J 204/h MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION j 16 Oct 92 - Present 308/h MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION 10 May 91 - Present LTC l(b)(6) I 524/h MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (COLUEXPLJ LTCrbl 521/h MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION 09 Jul 92 .;. Present ([ff" 18 Jul 90 - 08 Jul 92 .______J 532d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (OPIJPAVONSI LTCl 711/h MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION Jun 92 - Present tig 1")(6) I 20 Jun 90 - Jun 92 102 // 2- CONFIDEN11AL Unit/Commander Dates Served 712th ~fLITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION LTC(P)_(b)(S) I Oct 90 - 30 Sep ~1 713th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION LTC l(b}(6) I Oct 90 - Jun 92 714th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION ~ l(b)(6) I Jun 92 - Present· ig Oct 90 - Jun 92 730th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION L TC l(b)(6) I 29 Jun 90 - 1 Jan 92 DISCONTllNUED 731st MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION tigl(b)(S) · I 24 Jun 92 - Present 19 Jun 90- 23 Jun 92 732d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION l(b)(S) I 20 Aug 92 - Present tig 09 Nov 90 - 19 Aug 92 741st MU LTARYINTB I IGEN<(E BATTALION LTC~l(b-)(s_i~~~~~~___Jj 29 Jul 91 - Present 742d :LITARY INTELLIGENCE BA TTAL/ON LTCL(6) I 02 Jul 91 - Present 743d CE BATTALION LTC (bJ(SJ 28 Jul 92 - Present (b)(6) 18 Jun 91 - 27 Jul 92 LTC 746th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION LTC 1(b)(6) I 17 Jun 91 - 17 Oct 91 DISCONTllNUE 747th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BA TTALLON MAJ l(b)(6) I 23 Jul 91 - Present RE~iR Af>ED I INC'l ASSJFIFD ON 20 October 2015 I BY USAINSCOM FOl PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200.lR 103 CONFIDENTIAL ))3 CONFIDENFIAL Dates Served · · Unit/Commander 74Bth MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION LTC l(b)(6l I 21 Mar 91 - Present USAINSCOM MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (COUNTERINTELLIGENCE) (TECHNICAL) LTC l(b)(6l I 22 Jun 91 - Present USAINSCOM MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (COUNTERINTELLIGENCE) (COUNTERESPIONAGE) LTCl(bl( 6l I 06 Dec 89 - Jun 92 DISCONTllNUED IMAGERY AND ANALYSIS BATTALION 01 Oct 90 - Present MAJr(6) I U.S. ARMY FOREIGN MATERIEL INTELLIGENCE BATTALION 16 Aug 91 - Present LTC l(b)(6) I USAINSCOM MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (SE~l!RlllLTC _(b)(6l 23 Jul 90 - Present U.S. ARMY MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (LOW INTENSITY) LTC l(bl<6l 20 Jul 91 - Pres.ant .______J 5th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY (IN1i Pl EAC MAJ (bl<6l 19 Jun 92 - Present 21 Sep 90 - 18 Jun 92 CPT 11th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY (TECH INTEL CPT (bl(6l 01 Jul 92 - Present 15 Jul 91 - 30 Jun 92 CPT .______J REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON\20 October 2015 I BY USAINSCOM FOI PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200.lR 104 / ;'-(- CONFIDENTIAL .. -,- ' . ~ ~ ~- ... ' Unit/Commander Dates Served 164th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY (Cl) Nov 91 - Present g~~l'b"' I 23 Sep 88 - Nov 91 749th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY MAJ l(b)(6) I 26 Mar 91 - Present - Present Jun 91 - 181st Mll/TARYINTELL/GrNCE DETACHMENT MAJl(b)(6l 09 Sep 92 - Present CPT~. ~~~~~~~ 10 Jun 91 - 08 Sep 92 584th MILITARY INTELLIGENf£DETACHMENT LTC ICbl . 27 Aug 91 - Present \ 766th WI ITARY INTR l IGt;rCE DETACHMENT MAJ~'(b-)(e_i~~~~~---'- 02 Aug 91 - Present U.S. ARMYAS/AN STUDJiS DETACHMENT Mr.j(b)(6J - 14 Jan 89 - Present POLYGRAPH DETACHMENT MAJ l(b)(6) I 05 Aug 91 .- Present U.S. ARMY SPECIAL SECURITY DETACHMENT MAJ 08 Jul 90 - Present IMAGERY QETACHMENTPACrC (PROVISIONAL) C1'b"'' 06 Jul 92 - Present CW 01 Oct 89 - 05 Jul 92 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON I20 October 2015 I BY USAINSCOM FOIPA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200.IR 105 11< CONFIDENTIAL Unit/Commander Dates Served USAINSCOM MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT (COUNTERINTELLIGENCE), SllDDQ~R~T~~~~~---, vrnl(b)(6) CPT_ 22 Aug 90 - Present 3d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE CENTER (EAC) MAJl(b)(6) I 15 Jul 90 - Present 174th MILITARY INTE CE CENTER (EAC) CPT (bHGl U.S. ARMY FIELD SUPPO(?T CENTER COL\~(b-l(G_l~~~~-j~ 01 Jun 91 - Present USAINSCOM FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRAINING CEN[fR EUROPE LTC Lb)(Gl 18 Jul 91 - Present U.S. ARMY FOREIGN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER USAINSCOMAUTOMA, SYSTEMS ACTIVITY Mr.\(b)(6l May 89 - 30 Sep 92 DISCONTllNUE USAINSCOM FOBCF,ODERN/Z4 TION ACTIVITY Mrfl(Gl _ 01 Jan 89 - Present USAINSCOM MISSION SUpPfRT ACTIVITY Mr.l(b)(Gl __ 13 Mar 88 - Present USAINSCOM CONTJCT SUPPORT ACTIVITY Mr.\(b)(G) - Jul 87 - 30 Sep 92 DISCONTllNUED U.S. ARMY FOREIGN COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AC~VITY CCOO 'b"'' 12 Jun 92 - Present _ 08 Feb 88 - 11 Jun 92 REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED 106 oNl20 October 2015 I BY USAINSCOM F Unit/Commander Dates Served U.S. ARMY FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITY COLl(b)(6) I 11 Jun 91 - Present USAINSCOM MAINTENANCE ASSISTANCE AND INST~UCTION TEAMlMAIT) CPTL)(6) I 30 Mar 88 - Present U.S. -1RMY CENTRAL SECURITY FACILITY COL~b)(6) I 20 Jun 91 - Present U.S. ~RMYRUSSIAN INSTITUTE Aug 92 - Unit Transferred COL (b)(6) I 19 Jun 91 -Aug 92 COL ~~~~~~~~__J INSCr ACTIVITY FORT BEL VOIR MAJ(b)(6) I 10 Jul 92 - 30 Sep 92 DISCONTllNUED 107 CONFIDEN11AL I 17 APPENDIX I TRAVIS TROPHY WINNERS Calendar Year Winner 1964 6988th U.S. Air Force Security Squadron USASA NOMINEE: 53d USASA Special Operations Command 1966 313th ASA Battalion (Corps), Vietnam 1966 1st Radio Company Fleet Marine Force, Pacific USASA NOMINEE: USASA Training Center and School 1967 509th USASA Group, Vietnam 1968 6990th U.S. Air Force Security Squadron USASA NOMINEE: USASA, Europe 1969 699411\ U.S. Air Force Security Squadron USASA NOMINEE: 330th ASA Company 1970 USASA Field Station, Udorn 1971 U.S. Naval Security Group Adivity, Brememaven, Gennany USASA NOMINEE: USASA Field Station, Vint Hill Farms 1972 6916th U.S. Air Force Security Squadron USASA NOMINEE: USASA Field Station, Udom 1973 USASA Field Station, Berlin 1974 U.S. Naval Security Group Activity, Misawa, Japan USASA NOMINEE: USASA Field Station, Augsburg 1975 consolidated Security Operations Center, San Antonio (USASA Field Station, San Antonio16993d U.S. Air Force Security Squadron) 1976 USASA Field Station, Sobe 1977 47oth Military Intelligence Group 1978 6903th U.S. Air Force Security Squadron, Osan Air Base, Korea USASA NOMINEE: U.S. Army Field Station Augsburg 1979 U.S. Naval Security Group Activity, Misawa, Japan USAINSCOM NOMINEE: U.S. Army Field Station Sobe 1980 U.S. Army Field Station Misawa 1981 U.S. Army Field Station Berlin 1982 6912th U.S. Air Force Electronic Security Group, Berlin USAINSCOM NOMINEE: U.S. Army Field Station Benin 108 I Jg Calendar Year Winner 1983 6920th U.S. Air Force Electronic Security Group, Misawa, AB, Japan USAINSCOM NOMINEE: U.S. Army Field Station Augsburg 1984 Naval Security Group Activity, Edzell, Scotland USAINSCOM NOMINEE: U.S. Army Field Station Kunla 1985 U.S. Army Field Station Berlin 1986 Berlin 1987 Naval Security Group Activity, Misawa, Japan USAINSCOM NOMINEE: U.S. Army Field Station Kunia 1988 701 st Military lntemgence Brigade 1989 (b) (1) Per NSA,(b)(3):P.L 86-36 1990 109 11 ~ APPENDIXJ DIRECTOR'S TROPHY WINNERS Calendar Vear Winners 1979 Staff Commander Middle East Force, Jufair, Bahrain ARMY NOMINEE: 193d Brigade Support Company, Fort Amador, Panama 1980 6916th Electronic Security Squadron, Hellenikon Air Base, Greece ARMY NOMINEE: 372d ASA Co, 25th Inf Div, Oahu, Hawaii .. 1981 Navy Security Group ActMty, Athens, Greece ARMY NOMINEE: 372d ASA Co, 25th Inf Div, Oahu, Hawaii 1982 Task Force 138, U.S. Southern Command 1983 Second Radio Battalion Fleet Marine Force, Atlantic, Camp Lejuene, North Carolina ARMY NOMINEE: 193d Military Intelligence Company (CEWI), Panama 1984 224th Military Intelligence Battalion (Aerial Exploitation) 1985 525th Military Intelligence Brigade 1986 6916th Electronic Security Squadron, Hellenikon Air Base, Greece ARMY NOMINEE: 1st Military Intelligence Battalion (AE), Wle:sbaen. Air Base, Germany 1987 224th Military Intelligence Bat1alion (Aerial Exploitation) 1988 Second Radio Battalion Fleet Marine Force; Atlantic, Camp Lejuene, North carolina ARMY NOMINEE: 1st Military Intelligence Battalion (AE), Wiesbaden Air Base, Germany 1989 1990 110 1:io (b)(1 ),(b)(7)(E) 111 /cf)J Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. ~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s): (b )( 1)(b )(7)(E) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. D Other: DELETED P AGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 122-128 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R I Sep 93 Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. [gl Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s): (b )( 1)(b )(7)(E) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. r:z1 Other: (b)(l) Per CIA DELETED P AGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 129 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93 Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. [:8J Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s): (b)(l)(b)(7)(E) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. Other: DELETED P AGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 130 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R I Sep 93 Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. ~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s ): (b )( 1)(b )(7)(E) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. ~ Other: (b)(l) Per CIA DELETED P AGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 131 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93 Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page. [:.8J Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s): (b)(l)(b)(7)(E) It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release. D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request. D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you. D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision. D Other: DELETED P AGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE. Page(s) 132-134 IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R ~--1-S:!lillt-P.... 93-- ..,,.,_ 27 Jun 90 - Present