WASH Incident Report No.281 Date: 06/05/2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

WASH Incident Report No.281 Date: 06/05/2021 Location: Donetskyi raion (Donetsk NGCA) Prepared by: Volodymyr Kalinin, WASH Cluster IM & Stas Dymkovskyy WASH Officer WATER PUMPING STATION DIRECT HIT BY SHELLING, SECOND ALSO AFFECTED Yesterday, 5th May 2021 at 8.45 pm, according to the de-facto Donetsk JCCC and the local water company GPVD, there was a major incident at the Northern Pumping Station of Donetsk City: the pumping station wall received a direct hit by a military projectile. Luckily damage to the building was not as bad as first feared, and the clean water reservoir was not affected. However, three additional shells also fell within the grounds of the pumping station: four strikes in total. Although no one was killed or injured this is an extremely serious incident. All pumps were stopped, yesterday and staff evacuated. Treated water was stopped for residents of some parts of the city of Donetsk, mainly in the district of Kyivskyi. Pumps were restarted at 7 am today (6th May). In a second incident Ukrainian-owned Voda Donbasa water company informed the WASH Cluster that this morning (6th May from 5.00am to 5.40am) there was shelling, close to the 1st Lift Pumping Station of the South Donbas Water Way (1st LPS). Staff from the night shift of Voda Donbasu water company took cover in the on-site bomb shelter during what sounded like heavy shelling. Again, fortunately, there were no injuries and this time no damage was caused. The shelling of the 1st LPS once more put water supply to 1.1. million people at risk: the 1st LPS supplies water to five filter stations, between them providing clean water to Volnovakha, Pokrovsk, Dobropilia and Mariupol in Government Controlled Areas (GCA), and Donetsk city, Yasynuvata, Dokuchaievsk, Yasne and Olenivka in Non-Government Controlled Areas (NGCA). The WASH Cluster is in touch with water companies and will inform partners of any additional information or needs. 1st LPS Northern Pumping Station WASH Incident Report .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Report on the Human Rights Situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine 16 May to 15 August 2018 Contents Page I. Executive summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. OHCHR methodology ...................................................................................................................... 3 III. Impact of hostilities .......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Conduct of hostilities and civilian casualties ............................................................................. 3 B. Situation at the contact line and rights of conflict-affected persons ............................................ 7 1. Right to restitution and compensation for use or damage of private property ..................... 7 2. Right to social security and social protection .................................................................... 9 3. Freedom of movement, isolated communities and access to basic services ...................... 10 IV. Right to physical integrity ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Access to detainees and places of detention ............................................................................ 11 B. Arbitrary detention, enforced disappearance and abduction, torture and ill-treatment ............... 12 C. Situation
[Show full text]
Citizens and the State in the Government-Controlled Territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk Regions Problems, Challenges and Visions of the Future
Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future Funded by: This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union through International Alert. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of International Alert and UCIPR and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Layout: Nick Wilmot Creative Front cover image: A mother and daughter living in temporary accommodation for those displaced by the violence in Donetsk, 2014. © Andrew McConnell/Panos © International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research 2017 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions Problems, challenges and visions of the future October 2017 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 6 3. Findings 7 4. Statements from interviewees 22 5. Conclusions and recommendations 30 Citizens and the state in the government-controlled territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions 3 1. INTRODUCTION The demarcation line (the line of contact)1 and the ‘grey zone’ between the government-controlled2 and uncontrolled territories3 of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions separates the parties to the conflict in the east of Ukraine. The areas controlled by the Ukrainian authorities and bordering the ‘grey zone’ are very politically sensitive, highly militarised, and fall under a special governance regime that is different from the rest of the country. In the absence of a comprehensive political settlement and amid uncertain prospects, it is unclear how long this situation will remain. It is highly likely that over the next few years, Ukrainians in areas adjacent to the contact line will live under very particular and unusual governance structures, and in varying degrees of danger.
[Show full text]
1 Introduction
State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
[Show full text]
By Iain Overton on 18 Dec 2019
12/18/2019 A review of the healthcare impact from violence in Eastern Ukraine | AOAV By Iain Overton on 18 Dec 2019 Context and Background This paper offers insight into the direct and reverberating effects of the violence in Eastern Ukraine on healthcare systems and patient outcome. It is based on a report undertaken by the Deputy Chief of Healthcare Statistics in the Donbas Region, Dr. L. O. Polyanska. Key findings Some key findings of the report show that: Mortality rates in the Donetsk region, outstrip the birth rates. In 2016, the birth-rate stood at 7.05 per 1,000 people; mortality rates were at 16.4 per 1,000 people. The areas worst impacted have seen the fiercest fighting. The number of full-time staff positions of doctors in the Donetsk region between 2012 and 2016 decreased by 7.2%. The most significant decreases were observed in territories that witnessed the fiercest fighting, namely: Avdiivka (23.2% decrease); Mariinka (15.1%); and Yasynuvata (14.5%). The numbers of doctors per 10,000 in the Donetsk region fell by 8.8. There was also a decline in doctors with specialisms, especially amongst paediatric surgeons. As of 2016, there were no pulmonologists, urologists, neurosurgeons with a paediatric specialism across the entire region at all, with but a few specialists in paediatric haematology and gastroenterology. The provision of beds decreased by 14.1%. At the same time many specialised wards were closed down. The most significant decrease in the provision of beds was that of specialized beds for children. The reduction is both medical specialists and in beds, may have helped fuel the rise in hospital mortality rates, which increased 10.5% between 2012 and 2016.
[Show full text]
Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key Figures
Winterization Recommendations 2019-2020 Key figures In need In need coverage (total) (priority) (existing programmes) HHs in private Donetsk obl. 3,150 committed houses and + 37,126 HHs 5,500 apartments Luhansk obl. 2,350 gap GCA Indiv. in CCs committed and Social All Ukraine 7,700 Ind 7,700 Institutions 7,700 gap 5,531* gap 6,000 committed Donetsk obl. 33,500 HHs 14,603 HHs in private 8,603 gap houses and 2,500 committed apartments Luhansk obl. 20,700 HHs 9,000 NGCA 6,500 gap 11,347 committed Indiv. in non- Donetsk obl. 30,900 ind NA specialized CCs 19,553 gap and Social NA committed Luhansk obl. 19,100 ind NA Institutions NA gap 23,182* gap * Note: # of individuals in CCs and social institutions were divided by Cluster coefficient of 2.42 in order to get the final number in HHs Contents 1. Winterization context and objectives .............................................................................................. 2 2. Key recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 2 3. Winterization beneficiary prioritization ........................................................................................... 4 4. Heating ............................................................................................................................................. 6 (a) GCA ........................................................................................................................................... 6 (b) NGCA .......................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
East Ukraine
UKRAINE - East Ukraine For Humanitarian Purposes Only Pre-Conflict and Current Network for Selling Produce Production date : 10 October 2017 Pre-Conflict LUHANSK GCA Current LUHANSK GCA ² SIEVIERODONETSK ! SIEVIERODONETSK ! ! NOVOAIDAR ! NOVOAIDAR LYSYCHANSK ! LYSYCHANSK! SLOVIANSK EAST LUHANSK SLOVIANSK ! EAST LUHANSK POPASNA ! POPASNA ! ! ! KRAMATORSK ! KRAMATORSK ! ! ! BAKHMUT ! ! ! BAKHMUT ! ! ! STANYTSIA! STANYTSIA! BAKHMUT ! ! LUHANSKA DRUZHKIVKA ! LUHANSKA POPASNA ! BAKHMUT POPASNA PERVOMAISK DRUZHKIVKA ! PERVOMAISK ! ! ! LUHANSK ! LUHANSK ! KOSTIANTYNIVKA ! KOSTIANTYNIVKA ! ! ! ALCHEVSK TORETSK ALCHEVSK TORETSK !! ! ! DONETSK GCA TORETSK ! ! DONETSK GCA TORETSK ! ! ! ! ! HORLIVKA LUHANSK NGCA POKROVSK ! HORLIVKA LUHANSK NGCA POKROVSK AVDIIVKA AVDIIVKA ! ! KHRUSTALNYI KHRUSTALNYI ! AVDIIVKA ! SELYDOVE ! SELYDOVE ANTRATSYT AVDIIVKA ANTRATSYT YASYNUVATA YASYNUVATA SHAKHTARSK SHAKHTARSK ! MAKIIVKA MAKIIVKA KRASNOHORIVKA ! SNIZHNE KURAKHOVE ! !DONETSK ! DONETSK SNIZHNE WEST WEST DONETSK DONETSK ! ! DONETSK NGCA ! DONETSK NGCA ! ! ! ! VOLNOVAKHA ! VOLNOVAKHA ! ! ! ! RUSSIAN RUSSIAN FEDERATION ! FEDERATION SOUTH ! SOUTH DONETSK DONETSK ! !! ! MARIUPOL ! MARIUPOL ! SUMSKA Kms SEA OF AZOV SEA OF AZOV 0 10 20 30 POLTAVSKA KHARKIVSKA Settlements Selling Produce (symbol size Data Sources: LUHANSKA based on number of settlements with citizens Water bodies: © Open Street Map contributors who sold within) Assessed Settlements Administrative boundaries, settlements: OCHA, 2017 ! 1 DNIPROPETROVSKA Selling own agricultural produce connection Service network data: REACH, June 2017 ! ≤ 5 DONETSKA Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 37 N ! ≤ 10 BSU Boundary Contact: [email protected] ZAPORIZKA ! ≤ 15 5km Buffer from INSO Grey Zone RUSSIAN Note: Data, designations and boundaries contained on this map are not warranted to be error-free FEDERATION ≤ 30 and do not imply acceptance by the REACH partners, associated, or donors mentioned on this SEA OF AZOV ! INSO Grey Zone (May 2017) map..
[Show full text]
Human Rights in Eastern Ukraine During the Coronavirus Pandemic
Human rights in Eastern Ukraine during the coronavirus pandemic Results of monitoring along the Line of Contact IN LIMBO February This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development 8-12 (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of PROGRESS and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. HUMAN RIGHTS IN EASTERN UKRAINE DURING THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC 3 Results of monitoring along the Line of Contact February 8-12 Introduction Before the COVID-19 pandemic, there were over one million crossings per month on average at the entry-exit checkpoints (EECPs) to cross between government-controlled areas of Ukraine and areas controlled by Russia-backed separatists.1 Safe crossing for civilians through the EECPs at the Line of Contact (LoC), the demarcation line separating government- and non-government-controlled areas, is essential. This is especially important for many elderly residents living in non-government- controlled areas, who must cross through EECPs to access government pensions, withdraw cash, collect documents, or purchase medicine or food. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous and shifting guidelines and quarantine restrictions have dramatically increased the difficulty of crossing the LoC via the EECPs. Due to all these factors, those who have been near or tried crossing the EECPs often feel unsafe. Crossing the LoC during the COVID-19 pandemic also entails several additional requirements, not all of which people can fulfill. These requirements include having a suitable smartphone to install an obligatory mobile application, Vdoma, when not all crossers have smartphones or internet access; self-isolation requirements; and allowing time for delays in processing documents required from the crossers by either Ukrainian or so-called “Donetsk People’s Republic (DNR)/Luhansk People’s Republic (LNR)” de facto authorities.
[Show full text]
STATE of the SIVERSKYI DONETS BASIN and RELATED RISKS UNDER MILITARY OPERATIONS Technical Report
STATE OF THE SIVERSKYI DONETS BASIN AND RELATED RISKS UNDER MILITARY OPERATIONS Technical report 3 Contents INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................................................5 BASIN, WATER USE AND CHANGES OVER THE PERIOD OF HOSTILITIES ...................................................................7 ASSESSMENT OF WATER BODIES IN THE NON-GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED AREAS .........................................14 SURFACE WATER STATUS AND ITS CHANGES BASED ON THE MONITORING DATA .............................................20 HAZARD AND PREDICTED CONSEQUENCES OF ACCIDENTS.......................................................................................33 FURTHER STEPS: SURFACE WATERS ................................................................................................................................39 Dedicating the monitoring system to surface water quality ......................................................................................39 Analysis of sources and consequences of human-made accidents and emergency response measures .....42 GROUNDWATER STATUS .......................................................................................................................................................44 COAL MINE FLOODING AND ITS CAUSES ..........................................................................................................................54 FURTHER STEPS: GROUNDWATERS...................................................................................................................................61
[Show full text]
UKRAINE SITUATION REPORT February 2019
UKRAINE SITUATION REPORT February 2019 Ukraine Humanitarian 2019 Situation Report No. 2 © UNICEF/2019/Fillipov UNICEF’s Response with Partners UNICEF 2019 Sector/Cluster 2019 2019 Funds Available UNICEF Cumulative Cluster Cumulative Funds Target results (#) Target results (#) received Nutrition 2,000 0 to date: 1,300,000 n/a Health1 24,800 663 $.6M 3% 2 WASH 1,125,500 361,269 2,000,000 371,365 Child 170,000 18,044 1,300,000 n/a Carry- Protection forward Funding Education 34,500 12,989 200,000 n/a amount: gap: $3.3M HIV & AIDS3 200 0 n/a n/a $17.2M 16% 81% Number of people in need: 3,000,0004 (2019 UNICEF HAC) Number of children in need of humanitarian assistance: 500,0005 (2019 UNICEF HAC) Situation Overview & Humanitarian Needs On 31 January, the 2019 Ukraine Humanitarian Response Plan was launched in Kiev jointly with the Ministry of Temporary Occupied Territories (MTOT), requesting US$162 million to provide aid to 2.3 million people affected by the conflict. This includes UNICEF’s requirement of $21,067,799. During the month of February, two Member States briefings were organized – one in New York and the other one in Brussels. On the day of the Member States briefing in New York (12.02.2019), at the initiative of the Russian Government, the Security Council called for a meeting to discuss the humanitarian situation in eastern Ukraine. The Assistant Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Deputy Emergency Relief Coordinator, Ursula Mueller, briefed the Council on the humanitarian situation and its consequences on civilian population, with a special mention on the targeting of water infrastructure and water workers, as 1 UNICEF target additionally includes the estimated 80% immunization coverage of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, measles, mumps, rubella and polio vaccines.
[Show full text]
THEMATIC REPORT SMM Facilitation and Monitoring of Infrastructure
- 1 - THEMATIC REPORT SMM facilitation and monitoring of infrastructure repair in eastern Ukraine January 2017 – August 2018 December 2018 15362/18mf Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2018 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm Table of Contents Summary: Infrastructure in context ...................................................................................................... - 1 - Political framework for facilitation of infrastructure repair ............................................................... - 2 - Working Group on Security Issues (WGSI) .................................................................................... - 2 - Joint Centre for Control and Co-ordination (JCCC) ..................................................................... - 3 - SMM support for infrastructure maintenance and repair in eastern Ukraine ..................................... - 3 - Overall SMM operational contributions ........................................................................................ - 3 - Water supply in Donetsk region ..................................................................................................... - 5 - Electricity supply
[Show full text]
Factsheet, February 2017
UKRAINE FEBRUARY 2017 THE PROTECTION CLUSTER INCLUDES SUB-CLUSTERS ON CHILD PROTECTION, GENDER BASED VIOLENCE AND MINE-ACTION © Yevhen Maloletka/UNHCR, house destroyed by shelling in Avdiivka PROTECTION CONCERNS . Security situation: In February, OHCHR recorded 73 conflict-related civilian casualties (11 killed and 62 injured) – the highest numbers since August 2016. This increase is PROTECTION CLUSTER CONTACTS attributed to the escalation of hostilities in Avdiivka/Donetsk/Makiivka area from 29 January Anna Rich, Protection Cluster Coordinator, to 3 February 2017, which was accompanied by massive shelling from artillery and multi- [email protected] launch rocket systems of populated areas on both sides of the contact line. Sadaqat Shah Roghani, Child Protection Sub . Fighting was concentrated in at least 22 settlements along the contact line in both GCA and Cluster Coordinator [email protected] NGCA. Donetsk, Avdiivka - Yasynuvata and Mariupol areas witnessed the heaviest shelling. Olena Kochemyrovska, GBV Sub Cluster Fighting was also recorded in Marinka, Zaitseve, Pisky, Opytne and Kamianka (Donetsk Coordinator, [email protected] GCA). In Luhansk region, hostilities were recorded in Novozvanivka, Troitske (GCA), Martin Oubrecht, Mine Action Sub Cluster Novooleksandrivka (grey zone), Kalynove and Kalynove-Borshchuvate (NGCA), with a series Coordinator, [email protected] of clashes and indirect fire attacks in and around Zolote. Tetiana Lialka, Age and Disability TWG Coordinator, . Freedom of Movement: extremely difficult and arduous conditions were observed at [email protected] Stanytsia Luhanska - the only check-point in Luhansk region, with 2,500 to 4,000 people per day having to queue for up to seven hours in freezing conditions and then walk across the Olena Lukaniuk, House, Land and Property TWG Coordinator, [email protected] broken bridge.
[Show full text]
Ukraine: Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk
Country Policy and Information Note Ukraine: Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk Version 3.0 September 2017 Preface This note provides country of origin information (COI) and policy guidance to Home Office decision makers on handling particular types of protection and human rights claims. This includes whether claims are likely to justify the granting of asylum, humanitarian protection or discretionary leave and whether – in the event of a claim being refused – it is likely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under s94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. Decision makers must consider claims on an individual basis, taking into account the case specific facts and all relevant evidence, including: the policy guidance contained with this note; the available COI; any applicable caselaw; and the Home Office casework guidance in relation to relevant policies. Country information COI in this note has been researched in accordance with principles set out in the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI) and the European Asylum Support Office’s research guidelines, Country of Origin Information report methodology, namely taking into account its relevance, reliability, accuracy, objectivity, currency, transparency and traceability. All information is carefully selected from generally reliable, publicly accessible sources or is information that can be made publicly available. Full publication details of supporting documentation are provided in footnotes. Multiple sourcing is normally used to ensure that the information is accurate, balanced and corroborated, and that a comprehensive and up-to-date picture at the time of publication is provided. Information is compared and contrasted, whenever possible, to provide a range of views and opinions.
[Show full text]