DOCSLIB.ORG

Promoting Cotesia Rubecula Marshall, 1885 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Promoting Cotesia Rubecula Marshall, 1885 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae Promoting Cotesia rubecula Marshall, 1885 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) against the cabbage pest Pieris rapae Linnaeus, 1758 (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) through flowering plants Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktors der Philosophie vorgelegt der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Basel von Shakira Erna Fataar aus Zürich (ZH) Basel, 2021 Originaldokument gespeichert auf dem Dokumentenserver der Universität Basel edoc.unibas.ch Genehmigt von der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät auf Antrag von Fakultätsverantwortlicher: Prof. Dr. Ansgar Kahmen, Universität Basel Dissertationsleiter: Dr. Henryk Luka, Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau (FiBL), Frick Korreferent: Prof. em. Dr. Peter Nagel, Universität Basel Basel, den 26.03.2019 Prof. Dr. Martin Spiess, Dekan ii Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... VII LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... IX ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ XI SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 3 References ........................................................................................................................................ 9 CHAPTER 1 FUNDAMENTALS AND METHOD DEVELOPMENT ................................. 13 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 14 Rearing of insects ........................................................................................................................... 15 Breeding of P. rapae food plants ........................................................................................... 15 Pieris rapae ............................................................................................................................ 16 Cotesia rubecula .................................................................................................................... 19 Lab-experiments ............................................................................................................................ 21 Pre-trials of longevity experiments with C. rubecula ............................................................ 21 Pre-trials of fecundity experiments with C. rubecula ............................................................ 24 Pre-trials olfactometer ............................................................................................................ 29 Pre-trials of longevity experiments with P. rapae ................................................................. 32 Pre-trials of fecundity experiments with P. rapae ................................................................. 36 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 37 References ...................................................................................................................................... 37 Appendix ........................................................................................................................................ 40 iii CHAPTER 2 INNATE AND LEARNED OLFACTORY ATTRACTION TO FLOWERING PLANTS BY THE PARASITOID COTESIA RUBECULA (MARSHALL, 1885) (HYMENOPTERA: BRACONIDAE): POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON CONSERVATION BIOLOGICAL CONTROL ............................... 41 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 42 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 43 Material and Methods .................................................................................................................... 46 Flowering plants ..................................................................................................................... 46 Parasitoids .............................................................................................................................. 46 Y-tube olfactometer – Test procedure .................................................................................... 47 Absolute and relative olfactory attractiveness ....................................................................... 48 Associative learning potential of C. rubecula ........................................................................ 48 Statistics ................................................................................................................................. 49 Results ............................................................................................................................................ 49 Absolute and relative olfactory attractiveness ....................................................................... 50 Associative learning potential of C. rubecula ........................................................................ 51 Discussion ...................................................................................................................................... 52 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 56 References ...................................................................................................................................... 57 CHAPTER 3 HIGHER PROMOTION OF COTESIA RUBECULA (HYMENOPTERA: BRACONIDAE) THAN ITS HOST PIERIS RAPAE (LEPIDOPTERA: PIERIDAE) THROUGH FLOWERING PLANTS: PERSPECTIVES FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGICAL CONTROL.......................................................... 62 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 63 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 64 iv Material and Methods .................................................................................................................... 67 Plant and insect rearing .......................................................................................................... 67 Cotesia rubecula longevity assay........................................................................................... 67 Cotesia rubecula fecundity assay........................................................................................... 68 Pieris rapae longevity assay .................................................................................................. 68 Pieris rapae fecundity assay .................................................................................................. 69 Statistical analysis .................................................................................................................. 70 Results ............................................................................................................................................ 71 Cotesia rubecula longevity assay........................................................................................... 71 Cotesia rubecula fecundity assay........................................................................................... 73 Pieris rapae longevity assay .................................................................................................. 74 Pieris rapae fecundity assay .................................................................................................. 76 Discussion and Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 78 Cotesia rubecula longevity and fecundity ............................................................................. 79 Pieris rapae longevity and fecundity ..................................................................................... 80 Differentiated enhancement of the cabbage pest and its antagonist ....................................... 81 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 84 References ...................................................................................................................................... 84 CHAPTER 4 PEST DENSITY DEPENDENT SUCCESS OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGICAL CONTROL MEASURES: THE INCENTIVE TO PARASITIZE.. 90 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 91 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 92 Material and Methods ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Sweet Tooth of Adult Parasitoid <I>Cotesia Rubecula</I>: Ignoring
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications in the Biological Sciences Papers in the Biological Sciences 7-2004 The Sweet Tooth of Adult Parasitoid Cotesia rubecula: Ignoring Hosts for Nectar? Gitta Siekmann Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Germany, [email protected] Michael A. Keller University of Adelaide, Australia, [email protected] Brigitte Tenhumberg University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscifacpub Part of the Life Sciences Commons Siekmann, Gitta; Keller, Michael A.; and Tenhumberg, Brigitte, "The Sweet Tooth of Adult Parasitoid Cotesia rubecula: Ignoring Hosts for Nectar?" (2004). Faculty Publications in the Biological Sciences. 122. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscifacpub/122 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications in the Biological Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Journal of Insect Behavior 17:4 (July 2004), pp. 459–476. Copyright © 2004 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. Used by permission. Accepted April 19, 2003; revised March 30, 2004. The Sweet Tooth of Adult Parasitoid Cotesia rubecula: Ignoring Hosts for Nectar? Gitta Siekmann, Michael A. Keller, and Brigitte Tenhumberg Department of Applied and Molecular Ecology, The University of Adelaide, Waite Campus Private Bag 1, SA 5064 Glen Osmond, Australia Corresponding author — G. Siekmann. Present address: Institute for Plant Protection in Horticulture, Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Messeweg 11-12, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany; email [email protected] Abstract Investing time and energy into survival and reproduction often presents a trade-off to many species of animals.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a Parasitoid of Pieris Brassicae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae), As Affected by Experience
    WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY LABORATORY OF ENTOMOLOGY Host discrimination by Cotesia glomerata (L.) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of Pieris brassicae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae), as affected by experience No: 09.04 Name: Linda Heilmann Period: January 2004 – July 2004 Thesis: F050-707 1e Examinator: dr. ir. Joop A. van Loon 2e Examinator: dr. Nina E. Fatouros Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Host discrimination and superparasitism ................................................................ 3 1.2. Host searching by Cotesia glomerata ..................................................................... 5 1.2.1. Host microhabitat location ....................................................................... 5 1.2.2. Host location and host acceptance ............................................................ 7 1.3. Learning ............................................................................................................ 7 1.3.1. Learning in parasitoid wasps .................................................................... 7 1.3.2. Completeness of the information .............................................................10 1.3.3. Order of the information.........................................................................11 1.4. Previous research...............................................................................................11 2. Research questions .........................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Biology of Tile Marsh Fritillary Butterfly Euphydryas a Urinia
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY OF TILE MARSH FRITILLARY BUTTERFLY EUPHYDRYAS A URINIA CAROLINE ROSE BULMAN Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Biology Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation September 2001 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. 11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to Chris Thomas for his constant advice, support, inspiration and above all enthusiasm for this project. Robert Wilson has been especially helpful and I am very grateful for his assistance, in particular with the rPM. Alison Holt and Lucia Galvez Bravo made the many months of fieldwork both productive and enjoyable, for which I am very grateful. Thanks to Atte Moilanen for providing advice and software for the IFM, Otso Ovaskainen for calculating the metapopulation capacity and to Niklas Wahlberg and Ilkka Hanski for discussion. This work would have been impossible without the assistance of the following people andlor organisations: Butterfly Conservation (Martin Warren, Richard Fox, Paul Kirland, Nigel Bourn, Russel Hobson) and Branch volunteers (especially Bill Shreeve and BNM recorders), the Countryside Council for Wales (Adrian Fowles, David Wheeler, Justin Lyons, Andy Polkey, Les Colley, Karen Heppingstall), English Nature (David Sheppard, Dee Stephens, Frank Mawby, Judith Murray), Dartmoor National Park (Norman Baldock), Dorset \)Ji\thife Trust (Sharoii Pd'bot), )eNorI Cornwall Wildlife Trust, Somerset Wildlife Trust, the National Trust, Dorset Environmental Records Centre, Somerset Environmental Records Centre, Domino Joyce, Stephen Hartley, David Blakeley, Martin Lappage, David Hardy, David & Liz Woolley, David & Ruth Pritchard, and the many landowners who granted access permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Microgastrinae) Comb
    Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 63 (2019) 238–244 REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE Entomologia A Journal on Insect Diversity and Evolution www.rbentomologia.com Systematics, Morphology and Biogeography First record of Cotesia scotti (Valerio and Whitfield, 2009) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Microgastrinae) comb. nov. parasitising Spodoptera cosmioides (Walk, 1858) and Spodoptera eridania (Stoll, 1782) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil a b a a Josiane Garcia de Freitas , Tamara Akemi Takahashi , Lara L. Figueiredo , Paulo M. Fernandes , c d e Luiza Figueiredo Camargo , Isabela Midori Watanabe , Luís Amilton Foerster , f g,∗ José Fernandez-Triana , Eduardo Mitio Shimbori a Universidade Federal de Goiás, Escola de Agronomia, Setor de Entomologia, Programa de Pós-Graduac¸ ão em Agronomia, Goiânia, GO, Brazil b Universidade Federal do Paraná, Setor de Ciências Agrárias, Programa de Pós-Graduac¸ ão em Agronomia – Produc¸ ão Vegetal, Curitiba, PR, Brazil c Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Programa de Pós-Graduac¸ ão em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais, São Carlos, SP, Brazil d Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Departamento de Ecologia e Biologia Evolutiva, São Carlos, SP, Brazil e Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Zoologia, Curitiba, PR, Brazil f Canadian National Collection of Insects, Ottawa, Canada g Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: This is the first report of Cotesia scotti (Valerio and Whitfield) comb. nov. in Brazil, attacking larvae of the Received 3 December 2018 black armyworm, Spodoptera cosmioides, and the southern armyworm, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Venom Gland Extract Is Not Required for Successful Parasitism in the Polydnavirus-Associated Endoparasitoid Hyposoter Didymator (Hym
    Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 43 (2013) 292e307 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ibmb Venom gland extract is not required for successful parasitism in the polydnavirus-associated endoparasitoid Hyposoter didymator (Hym. Ichneumonidae) despite the presence of numerous novel and conserved venom proteins Tristan Dorémus a, Serge Urbach b, Véronique Jouan a, François Cousserans a, Marc Ravallec a, Edith Demettre b, Eric Wajnberg d, Julie Poulain c, Carole Azéma-Dossat c, Isabelle Darboux a, Jean-Michel Escoubas a, Dominique Colinet d, Jean-Luc Gatti d, Marylène Poirié d, Anne-Nathalie Volkoff a,* a INRA (UMR 1333), Université de Montpellier 2, “Insect-Microorganisms Diversity, Genomes and Interactions”, Place Eugène Bataillon, CC101, 34095 Montpellier Cedex, France b “Functional Proteomics Platform” BioCampus Montpellier, CNRS UMS3426, INSERM US009, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UMR5203, INSERM U661, Université de Montpellier 1 et 2, 34094 Montpellier, France c Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique (CEA), Institut de Génomique (IG), “Génoscope”, 2, rue Gaston-Crémieux, CP 5706, 91057 Evry, France d INRA (UMR 1355), CNRS (UMR 7254), Université Nice Sophia Antipolis, “Institut Sophia Agrobiotech” (ISA), 400 route des Chappes, 06903 Sophia Antipolis, France article info abstract Article history: The venom gland is a conserved organ in Hymenoptera that shows adaptations associated with life-style Received 25 October 2012 diversification. Few studies have investigated venom components and function in the highly diverse Received in revised form parasitic wasps and all suggest that the venom regulates host physiology. We explored the venom of the 21 December 2012 endoparasitoid Hyposoter didymator (Campopleginae), a species with an associated polydnavirus pro- Accepted 21 December 2012 duced in the ovarian tissue.
    [Show full text]
  • FORM NOR Application for Approval to IMPORT for RELEASE OR
    ER-AF-NOR-1-2 09/05 FORM NOR Application for approval to IMPORT FOR RELEASE OR RELEASE FROM CONTAINMENT ANY NEW ORGANISM INCLUDING A GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM BUT EXCLUDING CONDITIONAL RELEASE AND RAPID ASSESSMENT [Short title is: New Organism Unconditional Release] under section 34 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 Application Title: Release of Cotesia urabae for biological control of the pest gum leaf skeletoniser. Applicant Organisation: Scion (Forest Research Institute Ltd) ERMA Office use only Application Code: Formally received:____/____/____ ERMA NZ Contact: Initial Fee Paid: $ Application Status: 20 Customhouse Quay, Cnr Waring Taylor & Customhouse Quay PO Box 131, Wellington Phone: 04-916 2426 Fax: 04-914 0433 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ermanz.govt.nz Application for approval to import for release or release ER-AF-NOR-1-2 09/05 from containment any new organism including a genetically modified organism but excluding conditional Page 1 release and rapid assessment, under section 34 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1999 IMPORTANT 1. An associated User Guide is available for this form. You should read the User Guide before completing the form. If you need further guidance in completing this form please contact ERMA New Zealand. 2. This application form covers importation for release or release from containment of any new organism (i.e. full or unconditional release) including genetically modified organisms but excluding conditional release and rapid assessment, under section 34 of the HSNO Act 1996. If you are making an application to import for release or release from containment any new organism with controls (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Patch-Leaving Behavior: a Case Study Using the Parasitoid Cotesia Rubecula
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications in the Biological Sciences Papers in the Biological Sciences 2001 Optimal patch-leaving behavior: A case study using the parasitoid Cotesia rubecula Brigitte Tenhumberg University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Mike A. Keller University of Adelaide, [email protected] Hugh P. Possingham University of Queensland, [email protected] Andrew J. Tyre University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscifacpub Part of the Life Sciences Commons Tenhumberg, Brigitte; Keller, Mike A.; Possingham, Hugh P.; and Tyre, Andrew J., "Optimal patch-leaving behavior: A case study using the parasitoid Cotesia rubecula" (2001). Faculty Publications in the Biological Sciences. 192. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscifacpub/192 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications in the Biological Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Journal of Animal Ecology 70 (2001), pp. 683–691; doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00530.x Copyright © 2001 British Ecological Society; published by Wiley-Blackwell. Used by permission. Submitted November 23, 2000; revised March 23, 2001; published online December 20, 2001. Optimal patch-leaving behavior: A case study using the parasitoid Cotesia rubecula Brigitte Tenhumberg, Mike A. Keller, Hugh P. Possingham, and Andrew J. Tyre Department of Applied and Molecular Ecology, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, Private Bag 1, Glen Osmond, South Australia, 5064, Australia Abstract 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials and Methods
    Plant mediated effects on the outcome of competition between two parasitoid wasps Cotesia rubecula and Cotesia glomerata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) MSc Thesis – ENT-80436 Report no. 010.05 June – December 2009 Laboratory of Entomology Wageningen University Student: Anna Efremova MSc Plant Sciences Reg. no 861130217090 1st Examinator: Dr. Ir. Erik H. Poelman Plant Sciences Group 2nd Examinator: Prof. Dr. Marcel Dicke Plant Sciences Group ABSTRACT Parasitoid biology is tightly linked with their herbivore hosts, as their offspring develop in herbivores. Several parasitoid species exploit the same herbivore and as a result parasitoids may compete over herbivore hosts. In nature herbivore-parasitoid interactions occur within a complex insect community, which implies presence of several non-host species in the vicinity. Plants under herbivore attack emit specific volatiles, which selectively attracts parasitoids. Volatile information emitted by the plants, infested with non-host herbivore can distort searching environment of parasitoids. Thus, parasitoids involved in competitive interactions under complex environment have to rely on adaptive mechanisms, which would modify their host searching behavior. We studied competition for the host Pieris rapae between two congeneric parasitoids, Cotesia rubecula and C. glomerata under different micro-environments: when non-host feed on neighboring plants and when non-host feed on the same plant with the host. Moreover, we studied which adaptive mechanisms of wasps were responsible for the outcome of competitive interactions; here we focused on learning capabilities of wasps. Hypothesis that C. glomerata wasps, being an inferior competitor to C. rubecula inside a host body, would suffer less from competition with C. rubecula was confirmed. Although C.
    [Show full text]
  • Host Location by Hyperparasitoids: an Ecogenomic Approach
    Host location by hyperparasitoids: an ecogenomic approach Feng Zhu Thesis committee Promotor Prof. Dr Marcel Dicke Professor of Entomology Wageningen University Co-promoter Dr Erik H. Poelman Assistant professor, Laboratory of Entomology Wageningen University Other members Prof. Dr Niels P. R. Anten, Wageningen University Prof. Dr Monique M. van Oers, Wageningen University Dr T. Martijn Bezemer, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Wageningen Dr Klaas Vrieling, Leiden University This research was conducted under the auspices of the graduate school Experimental Plant Sciences. Host location by hyperparasitoids: an ecogenomic approach Feng Zhu Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. Dr. A.P.J. Mol in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Friday 2 October 2015 at 1:30 p.m. in the Aula Feng Zhu Host location by hyperparasitoids: an ecogenomic approach, 192 pages. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2015) With references, with summary in English ISBN 978-94-6257-444-1 To my beloved parents 谨以此书，献给我最亲爱的父母 Abstract It is fascinating that our ecological systems are structured by both direct and indirect spe- cies interactions. In terrestrial ecosystems, plants interact with many species of insects that include both harmful herbivores and beneficial natural enemies of herbivores. During the last 30 years, substantial progress has been made in different plant-insect systems regarding plant trait-mediated species interactions in a tritrophic context. However, plant- based food webs generally consist of more than three trophic levels.
    [Show full text]
  • A Misplaced Sense of Risk: Variation in U.S
    United States Department of Agriculture A MISPLACED SENSE OF RISK: VARIATION IN U.S. STANDARDS FOR MANAGEMENT OF RISKS POSED BY NEW SPECIES INTRODUCED FOR DIFFERENT PURPOSES Roy G. Van Driesche, Robert M. Nowierski, and Richard C. Reardon LEVEL OF REGULATION FISH & FUR-BEARING ANIMALS PETS HORTICULTURE ANIMALS VECTORING DISEASE BIOCONTROL AGENTS nutria LEAST REGULATED Burmese python MOST DANGEROUS kudzu smothering trees kudzu native frog killed by chytrid fungus fire belly toad thistle-feeding weevil trees being killed by nutria MOST REGULATED python eating deer LEAST DANGEROUS thistle seedhead destroyed by weevil HORTICULTURE ANIMALS VECTORING DISEASE FISH & FUR-BEARING ANIMALS PETS BIOCONTROL AGENTS LEVEL OF RISK Forest Health Assessment FHAAST-2019-02 and Applied Sciences Team July 2020 The Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 by the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. FHTET became Forest Health Assessment and Applied Sciences Team (FHAAST) in 2016. This booklet was published by FHAAST as part of the technology transfer series. https://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/applied-sciences/index.shtml Cover Photos: (a) nutria (Philippe Amelant, Wikipedia.org); (b) Burmese python (Roy Wood, National Park Service, Bugwood.org); (c) kudzu (Marco Schmidt, iNaturalist.org); (d) fire belly toad (Kim, Hyun-tae, iNaturalist.org); (e) thistle- feeding weevil (Eric Coombs, Oregon Department of Agriculture, Bugwood.org); (f) kudzu blanketing trees (Kerry Britton, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org); (g) native frog killed by chytrid fungus (Brian Gratwicke, iNaturalist. a b c d e org); (h) trees being killed by nutria (Gerald J.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictability of Host Ranges of Predators and Parasitoids Used In
    How predictable are the host ranges of parasitoids? Roy Van Driesche PSIS/Entomology UMASS, Amherst, MA, USA Spectrum of Host Specificity in Parasitoids Generalists– tachinid-Compsilura concinnata-200 species in many families Family level specialists- sciomyzid fly Pelidnoptera nigripennis (F.) (Julidae), the dryinid Neodryinus typhlocybae (Ashmead) (Flatidae), tachinid Aphantorhaphopsis samarensis (Lymantriidae) Subfamily/tribe specialists- tachinid Celatoria compressa (Galerucinae) Genus specialists- Cotesia glomerata (L.) (Pieris); Phymastichus coffea (Hypothenemus) Monospecific species- Cotesia rubecula (Marshall) (Pieris rapae) Lathrolestes nigricollis (? just Fenusa pumilla) Context dependent safety- where to draw the line depends on fauna of region receiving introduction Section 1: Correlates of host range (1) phylogeny (2) shared ecology (3) nature of host defenses Dacnusinae (Braconidae) parasitoids limit their attack to various (not all) agromyzid leafminers. For example, Dacnusa sibirica is an internal parasitoid of many Liriomyza spp. Leafminers in this genus are all polyphagous, such that the plant provides no constant signal useful to the parasitoid to discover its host. attacks Leafmine of Liriomyza bryoniae Dacnusa sibirica Correlates of host range (1) phylogeny (2) shared ecology (3) nature of host defenses Some external larval parasitoids may accept as hosts insects in leafmines with similar morphology on similar trees even if the actual leafminers are quite unrelated taxonomically (different orders). The driver here
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Conura Torvina (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) Reproduction and Biology in Relation to Hosts in Brassica Crops
    Studies on Conura torvina (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) Reproduction and Biology in Relation to Hosts in Brassica Crops. By David N. Gaines Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in ENTOMOLOGY Approved: Dr. L. T. Kok, Chair, Entomology Dr. R. L. Pienkowski, Entomology Dr. D. G. Pfeiffer, Entomology Dr. R. D. Fell, Entomology Dr. B. D. Opell, Biology January 24, 1997, Blacksburg Virginia Keywords: Cotesia orobenae, Cotesia rubecula, Pieris rapae, Plutella xylostella, development time, hyperparasite, ovaries, ovarioles, ovulation, oviposition, superparasitism, seasonality, trap plants, trap hosts. Studies on Conura torvina (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) Reproduction and Biology in Relation to Hosts in Brassica Crops. David N. Gaines Abstract Conura torvina (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) is a solitary pupal endoparasite of numerous insect species. In Brassica crops it acts as a parasite of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) and was found as a hyperparasite of Cotesia rubecula (Marshall) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and several other parasitoid species. Cotesia rubecula was introduced into Virginia in 1987 as a biological control agent for Pieris rapae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae), and because C. torvina was thought to have eliminated this population of C. rubecula, studies of C. torvina’s reproductive biology and behavior were initiated. A study using plants laden with “trap hosts” to detect C. torvina activity in the spring indicated no activity until late June, but proved trap host sampling to be an efficient and effective method of monitoring C. torvina activity. Studies of C. torvina’s ability to reproduce in C.
    [Show full text]