DOCSLIB.ORG

Plant Distributions in the Southwestern United States: a Scenario Assessment of the Modern-Day and Future Distribution Ranges of 166 Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plant Distributions in the Southwestern United States: a Scenario Assessment of the Modern-Day and Future Distribution Ranges of 166 Species Plant Distributions in the Southwestern United States: A Scenario Assessment of the Modern-Day and Future Distribution Ranges of 166 Species By Kathryn A. Thomas, Patricia P. Guertin, and Leila Gass Open-File Report 2012–1020 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Thomas, K.A., Guertin, P.P., and Gass, L., 2012, Plant distributions in the southwestern United States; a scenario assessment of the modern-day and future distribution ranges of 166 species: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012–1020, 83 p. and 166-page appendix, available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1020/. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Contents Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose and Scope of Study ................................................................................................................................... 1 Background Information .......................................................................................................................................... 2 The Study Area ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Methods ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Modeling Environment ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Model Input Data Sources and Initial Processing .................................................................................................... 3 Plant Species and their Occurrence Locations .................................................................................................... 3 Modern-day Climate Data .................................................................................................................................... 6 Future Climate Scenarios .................................................................................................................................... 6 Model Development................................................................................................................................................. 7 Suitable Habitats: Modern-day and Future scenarios ............................................................................................ 10 Model Agreement for Suitability Classes ............................................................................................................... 10 Species’ Vulnerability, Potential, and Risk Categories .......................................................................................... 10 Results ...................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Model Performance Metrics ................................................................................................................................... 11 Suitable Habitats—Modern-day and Future Scenarios .......................................................................................... 12 Species’ Vulnerability, Potential, and Risk Categories .......................................................................................... 16 Species Vulnerability to Loss of Modern-day Suitable Habitat ........................................................................... 16 Species Potential to Gain Suitable Habitat ........................................................................................................ 18 Relative Risk ...................................................................................................................................................... 19 Summary and Discussion ......................................................................................................................................... 24 Factors in Interpreting Results ........................................................................................................................... 25 Next Steps ......................................................................................................................................................... 26 Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................................................... 27 References Cited ...................................................................................................................................................... 27 Contents of the Appendixes ...................................................................................................................................... 29 Appendix A Assessment results for the 166 plant species: Summary tables ........................................................ 29 Appendix B Assessment results for the 166 plant species: Spatial models ....................................................... 29 Appendix A Assessment Results for the 166 Plant Species: Summary Tables ..................................................... 34 Appendix B Assessment Results for the 166 Plant Species: Spatial Models Figures 1 to 166. ................................ 83 Figures 1. Map showing Southwest study area and ecoregions. .......................................................................................... 4 2. Example of map results reported for each species in appendix B. .................................................................... 15 iii Tables 1. Field studies supplying species’ location data. ..................................................................................................... 5 2. 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scenarios represented by Climate Wizard climate grids and used to predict future suitable habitat. ........................................................................................................... 7 3. General circulation models incorporated into Climate Wizard climate grids used to predict future suitable habitat. .................................................................................................................................................................. 8 4. Climate scenarios used to predict suitable habitat for modern-day and future conditions. ................................... 9 5. Future suitable habitat (SH) suitability classes and their relations to modern-day and future model suitability predictions. ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 6. Species were assigned to one of nine risk categories that represented three levels of vulnerability to loss of modern-day habitat and three levels of potential to gain of new habitat. ............................................................ 12 7. An illustrative subsection of summary data presented in appendix A, table 1. .................................................. 13 8. An illustrative subsection of summary data presented in appendix A, table 2. .................................................. 14 9. The average percentage and standard deviation for tree, shrub, and grass species of the total area predicted for each suitability class by all three model results concurrently to the total areas predicted by all three combined. ................................................................................................................................................. 16 10. An illustrative subsection of summary data presented in appendix A, Model agreement for future suitable habitat . .............................................................................................................................................................. 17 11. An illustrative subsection of summary data presented in appendix A, table 4 for the suitable habitat (SH) vulnerability and potential scores for a species. ................................................................................................ 18 12. Assignment of tree species to risk categories. ................................................................................................... 20 13. Assignment of shrub species to risk categories. ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Havasu City Recommended Landscaping Plant List
    Lake Havasu City Recommended Landscaping Plant List Lake Havasu City Recommended Landscaping Plant List Disclaimer Lake Havasu City has revised the recommended landscaping plant list. This new list consists of plants that can be adapted to desert environments in the Southwestern United States. This list only contains water conscious species classified as having very low, low, and low-medium water use requirements. Species that are classified as having medium or higher water use requirements were not permitted on this list. Such water use classification is determined by the type of plant, its average size, and its water requirements compared to other plants. For example, a large tree may be classified as having low water use requirements if it requires a low amount of water compared to most other large trees. This list is not intended to restrict what plants residents choose to plant in their yards, and this list may include plant species that may not survive or prosper in certain desert microclimates such as those with lower elevations or higher temperatures. In addition, this list is not intended to be a list of the only plants allowed in the region, nor is it intended to be an exhaustive list of all desert-appropriate plants capable of surviving in the region. This list was created with the intention to help residents, businesses, and landscapers make informed decisions on which plants to landscape that are water conscious and appropriate for specific environmental conditions. Lake Havasu City does not require the use of any or all plants found on this list. List Characteristics This list is divided between trees, shrubs, groundcovers, vines, succulents and perennials.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrubland Ecosystem Genetics and Biodiversity: Proceedings; 2000 June 13–15; Provo, Suite of Locations
    Plant Diversity at Box-Death Hollow Wilderness Area, Garfield County, Utah Wendy Rosler Janet G. Cooper Renee Van Buren Kimball T. Harper Abstract—“The Box” is a canyon located in the western portion of Under the direction of Janet Cooper, the Provo High Box-Death Hollow Wilderness Area, Garfield County, southern School Botany Club initiated this study in the fall of 1993. Utah. The objectives of this study included: (1) collect, identify and During the following 2 years (1994 and 1995) five collection make a checklist of the species of vascular plants found in “The trips were taken at different times of the year to provide a Box,” (2) search for threatened and endangered species within the reliable sample of the canyon’s flora. Each collection trip area, (3) provide an opportunity for high school students to develop emphasized a different section of the canyon, but on each research skills that contribute to the reservoir of scientific informa- trip, specimens of species previously unknown in the area tion. During a period of 2 years, students of the Provo High School were collected throughout the canyon. Plants collected were Botany Club, the club advisor, and others collected and identified either immediately identified and pressed or collected in 304 species in 63 families. Twenty plant taxa collected during this plastic bags and pressed as soon as the group arrived back study had not previously been reported for Garfield County, UT. at camp. Identification and classification followed “A Utah Species-area relationships at this area are compared to selected Flora” (Welsh and others 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Nursery Production of Selected Actinorhizal Species
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 12-2008 Nursery Production of Selected Actinorhizal Species Taun D. Beddes Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Agricultural and Resource Economics Commons Recommended Citation Beddes, Taun D., "Nursery Production of Selected Actinorhizal Species" (2008). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 170. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/170 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NURSERY PRODUCTION OF SELECTED ACTINORHIZAL SPECIES by Taun Beddes A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Plant Science Approved: _____________________ _____________________ Heidi A. Kratsch Paul R. Grossl Major Professor Committee Member _____________________ _____________________ Michael R. Kuhns William A. Varga Committee Member Committee Member _____________________ Byron R. Burnham Dean of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2008 ii Copyright © Taun Beddes 2008 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Nursery Production of Selected Actinorhizal Species by Taun Beddes, Master of Science Utah State University, 2008 Major Professor: Heidi A. Kratsch Department: Plants, Soils, and Climate An important aspect of sustainable landscaping includes utilization of plants requiring few to no inputs once installed. Limited research exists for many of these species. For this research, we chose four with potential for use: Mexican cliffrose (Purshia mexicana ), silver buffaloberry (Shepherdia argentea ), roundleaf buffaloberry (Shepherdia rotundifolia ), and seaside alder (Alnus maritima ).
    [Show full text]
  • I INDIVIDUALISTIC and PHYLOGENETIC PERSPECTIVES ON
    INDIVIDUALISTIC AND PHYLOGENETIC PERSPECTIVES ON PLANT COMMUNITY PATTERNS Jeffrey E. Ott A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Biology Chapel Hill 2010 Approved by: Robert K. Peet Peter S. White Todd J. Vision Aaron Moody Paul S. Manos i ©2010 Jeffrey E. Ott ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Jeffrey E. Ott Individualistic and Phylogenetic Perspectives on Plant Community Patterns (Under the direction of Robert K. Peet) Plant communities have traditionally been viewed as spatially discrete units structured by dominant species, and methods for characterizing community patterns have reflected this perspective. In this dissertation, I adopt an an alternative, individualistic community characterization approach that does not assume discreteness or dominant species importance a priori (Chapter 2). This approach was used to characterize plant community patterns and their relationship with environmental variables at Zion National Park, Utah, providing details and insights that were missed or obscure in previous vegetation characterizations of the area. I also examined community patterns at Zion National Park from a phylogenetic perspective (Chapter 3), under the assumption that species sharing common ancestry should be ecologically similar and hence be co-distributed in predictable ways. I predicted that related species would be aggregated into similar habitats because of phylogenetically-conserved niche affinities, yet segregated into different plots because of competitive interactions. However, I also suspected that these patterns would vary between different lineages and at different levels of the phylogenetic hierarchy (phylogenetic scales). I examined aggregation and segregation in relation to null models for each pair of species within genera and each sister pair of a genus-level vascular plant iii supertree.
    [Show full text]
  • SNRPC Regional Plant List
    1 Southern Nevada Regional Planning Coalition Regional Plant List Southern Nevada Regional Planning Coalition RegionalRegional PlantPlant ListList ApprovedApproved JuneJune 28,28, 20112011 1 Acknowledgements This Regional Plant List has been the effort of literally countless hours of work from members of the Southern Nevada Regional Planning Coalition’s (SNRPC) Regional Urban Forestry Work Group and local arboriculture and horticulture experts. Special thanks go to the following individuals for their contributions: Shane Ammerman, Clark County Paul Andricopulos, Chair, City of Henderson Cleto Arceo, NV Energy Andréa Baker, Southern Nevada Water Authority Dave Cornoyer, City of Las Vegas Adria DeCorte, Nevada Division of Forestry Greg Deuley, TruGreen Landcare Paula Garrett, University of Nevada Las Vegas Steve Glimp, Schilling Horticulture Group, Inc. Bob Hoyes, City of North Las Vegas Jon Jainga, City of North Las Vegas Michael Johnson, City of Henderson John Jones, City of North Las Vegas Teri Knight, United States Department of Agriculture Matt Koepnick, Nevada Division of Forestry Paul Noe, Star Nursery Lisa Ortega, City of Henderson Craig Palmer, University of Nevada Las Vegas Alan Paulson, Clark County School District Lynn Phelps, professional arborist M.L. Robinson, University of Nevada Cooperative Extension Norm Schilling, Schilling Horticulture Group, Inc. Daniel Sinagra, Clark County Dennis Swartzell, Horticultural Consultants, Inc. Russ Thompson, Clark County Amie Wojtech, City of Henderson On the cover: Acacia Demonstration
    [Show full text]
  • Garay (Orchidaceae, Spiranthinae) in Northeastern Mexico
    https://www.scirp.org/journal/ns Natural Science, 2020, Vol. 12, (No. 8), pp: 599-619 Flora and Vegetation Associated with Dichromanthus cinnabarinus (La Llave & Lex.) Garay (Orchidaceae, Spiranthinae) in Northeastern Mexico Elba Zarahy Garay-Martínez1, Jacinto Treviño-Carreón1, Tania Judith Hernández-López1, Juana María Coronado-Blanco1, Claudia C. Astudillo Sánchez1, Leroy Soria-Díaz2, Arturo Mora-Olivo2 1Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Centro Universitario Adolfo López Mateos, Ciudad Victoria, Ciudad Victoria México; 2Instituto de Ecología Aplicada, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, División del Golfo, Col. Libertad, Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, México Correspondence to: Treviño-Carreón Jacinto, Keywords: Northeastern Mexico, Flora, Vegetation, Endemism Received: July 7, 2020 Accepted: August 22, 2020 Published: August 25, 2020 Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access ABSTRACT Studies conducted in northeastern Mexico have not provided information on the flora and vegetation associated with Dichromanthus cinnabarinus. Therefore, it is necessary to study the areas where this orchid is distributed to understand the plant vegetation interaction. Research questions: What plant species are associated with Dichromanthus cinnabarinus? What is the degree of similarity among the plant communities with which Dichromanthus cinnabarinus is associated? Study site: Northeastern Mexico, comprehending the states of Coahuila, Nuevo Leon and Tamaulipas. Methods: The study sites were selected considering the presence of Dichromanthus cinnabarinus. Regarding the study of the plant structure, the tree, shrub, and herbaceous strata were obtained by the methodology of quadrants. Data were collected in April and August 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • What's in a Name?
    elseyaNewsletter of the Montana Native Plant Society Kelseya uniflora ill. by Bonnie Heidel K identification and publication. Technically, Barton What’s in a Name? remained in charge of publishing Lewis’ discoveries but Pursh and Purshia his advanced age, poor health and decreasing productivity by Walter Fertig (Barton’s flora never came close to being completed) [This article originally appeared in the September 2009 issue of Sego prompted Lewis to hire Pursh for the task. Pursh was Lily, the newsletter of the Utah Native Plant Society. paid $70 to organize the collection, prepare illustrations Frederick Pursh sought botanical fame in North America, and write new species descriptions as part of a planned but due to some unscrupulous deeds, achieved greater publication on the scientific infamy instead. Despite publishing one of the first floras findings of the Lewis and to cover North America, he died penniless at the age of 46 Clark expedition. with the reputation of a drunkard and a cheat. Perhaps it Unfortunately, this is no surprise that “bitterbrush” is a common name of the publication was never genus named in his honor. completed. Lewis Pursh was born in Saxony in 1774, and was educated committed suicide in the in the ways of horticulture and taxonomy at the fall of 1809. Barton failed Royal Botanical Gardens in Dresden. At the age of 25, to live up to his obligations Pursh emigrated to the United States, where he was to publish the collections employed at several botanical gardens in Baltimore and of the Lewis and Clark Philadelphia. expedition before his own In 1805, Pursh was hired by Benjamin Smith Barton to death in 1815.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Water Use Drought Tolerant Plant List
    LowLowLowLow WaterWaterWaterWater UseUseUseUse DroughtDroughtDroughtDrought TolerantTolerantTolerantTolerant PlantPlantPlantPlant ListListListList OfficialOfficial RegulatoryRegulatory ListList forfor thethe ArizonaArizona DepartmentDepartment ofof WaterWater Resources,Resources, PrescottPrescott ActiveActive ManagementManagement AreaArea 22002200 EastEast HillsdaleHillsdale RoadRoad (928)(928) 778-7202778-7202 Prescott,Prescott, AZAZ 8630186301 www.azwater.govwww.azwater.gov Photo - Jim Morgan LOW WATER USE DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANT LIST OFFICIAL REGULATORY LIST FOR THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES PRESCOTT ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA This is an official regulatory list that was developed to guide the regulated community in choosing low water use and drought tolerant landscaping plants. Within the Prescott AMA, all plants irrigated with groundwater within any publicly owned right-of-way of a highway, street, road, sidewalk, curb or shoulder which is used for travel in any ordinary mode, including pedestrian travel, may be used only if the plants are listed on the ADWR Low Water Use Plant List (or any subsequent modifications to the list) for the Prescott AMA. Per the Third Management Plan, the director may waive this requirement under special circumstances. This requirement does not apply to any portion of a residential lot that extends into a publicly owned right-of-way. This list can also be used as a resource for residents and businesses that are interested in conserving water through low-water-use landscaping. These plants can be grown in the Prescott area with no-to-moderate supplemental irrigation once the plant is established. All plants listed can grow with less water than traditional high water use landscape plants and do not require more than the Prescott AMA criteria for low water use plants: a maximum of 12 inches of supplemental irrigation on an annual basis, not including rainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Análisis De La Flora Vascular De La Sierra Azul, Chihuahua, México
    Botanical Sciences 98(3): 618-652. 2020 Recibido: 22 de enero de 2020, Aceptado: 21 de mayo de 2020 DOI: 10.17129/botsci.2565 Primero en línea: 24 de julio de 2020 Taxonomía y Florística / Taxonomy and Floristics ANÁLISIS DE LA FLORA VASCULAR DE LA SIERRA AZUL, CHIHUAHUA, MÉXICO ANALYSIS OF THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE SIERRA AZUL, CHIHUAHUA, MEXICO ID JOSÉ HUMBERTO VEGA-MARES, OTILIA RIVERO-HERNÁNDEZ, MARTÍN MARTÍNEZ-SALVADOR, ID ALICIA MELGOZA-CASTILLO* Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, México. *Autor de correspondencia: [email protected] Resumen Antecedentes: La Sierra Azul constituye una zona de transición entre las regiones florísticas Xerofítica Mexicana y Mesoamericana de Montaña que carece de un inventario florístico. Preguntas: ¿Cuáles familias, géneros y especies de plantas vasculares alberga Sierra Azul?, ¿Qué características tiene la flora? ¿Cuánta afinidad florística tiene la Sierra Azul con las regiones florísticas adyacentes? Especie en estudio: Plantas vasculares Sitio de estudio y fechas: Sierra Azul, Chihuahua; marzo 2007 a octubre 2009 Métodos: Los ejemplares se determinaron con claves taxonómicas para los distintos grupos, consulta con taxónomos especialistas y corroboración con ejemplares de herbario. Con base en literatura, observaciones de campo y bases de datos se obtuvo información sobre: origen, duración del ciclo de vida, forma de vida, endemismo y estatus. La afinidad florística con cuatro localidades de las regiones florísticas adyacentes se analizó con datos de presencia ausencia, para esto se utilizó MVSP. Resultados: La flora está integrada por 742 taxones de 353 géneros pertenecientes a 89 familias; incluye seis nuevos registros para el estado. Del total de los taxones, el 82 % son herbáceas, 54 % son perennes, 4.6 % son especies introducidas y 10.1 % presenta algún estatus de protección.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinyon-Juniper Woodlands
    Ecology, Management, and Restoration of Piñon-Juniper and Ponderosa Pine Ecosystems: Combined Proceedings of the 2005 St. George, Utah and 2006 Albuquerque, New Mexico Workshops United States Department of Agriculture / Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Proceedings RMRS-P-51 September 2008 Gottfried, Gerald J.; Shaw, John D.; Ford, Paulette L., compilers. 2008. Ecology, management, and restoration of piñon-juniper and ponderosa pine ecosystems: combined proceedings of the 2005 St. George, Utah and 2006 Albuquerque, New Mexico workshops. Proceedings RMRS-P-51. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 218 p. Abstract ___________________________________________ Southwestern piñon-juniper and juniper woodlands cover large areas of Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, and adjacent Colorado. Ponderosa pine forests are the most common timberland in the Southwest. All three ecosystems provide a variety of natural resources and economic benefits to the region. There are different percep- tions of desired conditions. Public and private land managers have adapted research results and their observations and experiences to manage these ecosystems for multi- resource benefits. Ways to mitigate the threat of wildfires is a major management issue for these ecosystems, and the wide-spread piñon mortality related to drought and the bark beetle infestation has heightened concerns among managers and the general public. In addition, the impacts of climate change on these ecosystems are a growing concern. As a step in bringing research and management together to answer some of these questions, workshops concerned with the ecology, management, and restoration of piñon-juniper and ponderosa pine ecosystems were held in St. George, Utah in 2005 and in Albuquerque, New Mexico in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Evaluation Sensitive Flora and Fauna 2016
    Silver Standard Resources, Inc. Biological Evaluation For Sensitive Flora and Fauna 2016 PERDITO EXPLORATION PROJECT NOVEMBER, 2016 Silver Standard Resources, Inc. Perdito Exploration Project BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION - 2016 FOR SENSITIVE FLORA AND FAUNA 1.0 INTRODUCTION Cedar Creek Associates, Inc. (Cedar Creek) was retained in 2016 by Silver Standard Resources, Inc. (Silver Standard) to re-evaluate an historic exploration area near Conglomerate Mesa, California for sensitive fauna and to verify a sensitive floral survey that occurred in 1997 with follow-up surveys completed in 2014 by Mr. Mark Bagley of Bishop, California. Also in 1997, BHP Minerals International Exploration, Inc. (BHP) retained Kiva Biological Consulting (aka Mr. Peter Woodman of Bakersfield, California) to evaluate an area for faunal resources, the footprint of which appears identical to that of the current Perdito project, but was known at the time as the Conglomerate Mesa Project. To facilitate this work, Cedar Creek consulted with the Ridgecrest Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management (Ms. Caroline Woods) to coordinate locations for surveys and target flora and fauna. At present, Silver Standard is proposing to conduct a drilling program in this remote area of Inyo County within Township 17S, Range 39E, Sections 3 and 4 on lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Ridgecrest Field Office. As indicated above, the proposed drill roads appear to be identical to those established, reclaimed, and revegetated in 2000, by BHP. In addition to these previously disturbed alignments, the BLM has provided a few alternate alignment segments and locations that occur on undisturbed native ground. Project area elevations range from 6400 to 7400 feet above MSL and climate is temperate continental (hot dry summers and cold dry winters) with average annual precipitation in the 6-inch range.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D. Revised Biological Assessment and Evaluation
    Appendix D. Revised Biological Assessment and Evaluation Introduction The USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region (Forest Service), proposes to authorize the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to use herbicides as part of vegetation management along Interstate Highways, Federal Highways, and State roads that pass through National Forest System lands in Arizona. The purpose of this program is: 1) to control vegetation that presents a safety hazard to motorists; and 2) to contain, control, or eradicate noxious weeds that can spread from highways onto adjacent forests and rangelands. This Biological Assessment and Evaluation (BAE) determines the effects of this program (i.e. herbicide use) on 21 animals and 4 plants that are listed or proposed under the Endangered species Act of 1973, as amended (Table 1). It also determines the effects of this program on 36 animals and 27 plants designated as Sensitive by the Regional Forester of the Southwestern Region (Table 2). This BAE will not analyze the effects of other vegetation management techniques (i.e. mowing, grading, etc.) that are already authorized and being used. We have determined that this program of herbicide use with its proposed conservation measures is not likely to adversely affect or will have no effect on any endangered, threatened, or proposed species; any designated or proposed critical habitat areas; or, any nonessential experimental populations. We have further determined that this program of herbicide use with its proposed conservation measures will not reduce population viability or harm any Forest Service Sensitive species in a way that would increase its likelihood of trending toward Federal listing.
    [Show full text]