WILLIS RE ANALYTICS eVENT™

2014 Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook: Aug 15, 2014 This seasonal forecast briefing is the third and final update. In this briefing, we provide a summary of how the remainder of the hurricane season appears to be shaping up.

Current situation Forecasts The 2014 North Atlantic hurricane has been Forecast skill is generally higher for forecasts issued part way through fairly average so far. The season got off to an the hurricane season due to shorter lead-time and the fact that some of early start with Tropical Storm Arthur the season has already passed. The major centers remain unanimous in attaining hurricane status over a month continuing to forecast below average activity (Table 1) with a slight before the long-term average date of the first nudge downward in forecast activity from their forecasts issued in early hurricane. followed in early July. August and remained out over the open ocean where it re-curved toward Europe and caused The CSU forecast is based on their new early-August statistical significant flooding across the U.K. prediction scheme that is then moderated by the average activity in five analog years and some qualitative adjustment for factors not directly As we enter the peak of the hurricane season considered in their calculations. Their forecast for a quiet season is the storms to watch will be those that develop guided by cooler than normal ocean temperatures and higher than in the far eastern Atlantic just off the African normal over the tropical North Atlantic, and a forecast for coast since these have greater potential to weak El Niño conditions throughout the remainder of the season. become major hurricanes on their long track towards the U.S. However, so far the cooler The NOAA forecast, based on information from an array of dynamical than normal sea surface temperatures and dry simulations, is also nudged downwards from their pre-season forecast, air aloft has been suppressing development. again reflecting the unfavorable conditions over the tropical North Unfavorable wind shear has also been far Atlantic. In addition to high vertical wind shear, cool ocean stronger than normal – the highest in the temperatures and dry warm air at mid-levels, they also cite a southward historical 45-year record (NOAA, 2014). The shift in a core of winds at about 3km above the surface known as the likelihood of weak to moderate El Niño African Easterly Jet. This southward shift of the jet reduces the amount conditions developing for the remainder of of cyclonic spin in the background environment for hurricane the season will lead to further deterioration of formation. this already unfavorable environment. The range in the forecast numbers of named storms across the major Given that these unfavorable conditions are forecasting centers (Table 1) is 8.6 to 12.0 with an average of 10.2 forecast to persist and possibly grow stronger, (compared to a typical number of 12). The range in the forecast forecast centers are unanimous in predicting a numbers of hurricanes is between 3.6 and 6 with an average of 4.6 year of low activity. However, we caution that (compared to a typical number of 6.5), and the range in the forecast this does not necessarily correspond to a low- numbers of major hurricanes (Saffir-Simpson category 3-5) is between impact year. NOAA/CPC finds that the 1 and 2 with an average of 1.5 (compared with a typical number of 2). likelihood of at least one U.S. hurricane To give an idea of typical error bars on these forecasts, CSU states that landfall is the same under El Niño, neutral they expect two-thirds of forecasts to verify within 1 standard deviation and La Niña conditions. of the forecast number. This year, that range is between 6.7 and 11.3 named storms for the remainder of the season.

Page 1 of 4

CSU predicts the likelihood of a major U.S. hurricane landfall during the remainder of the season at 73% of the average likelihood. CSU issues landfall probabilities that leverage skill from the long-term relationship between total basin activity and landfall. We caution that recent years saw exceptions to this rule; this may suggest a temporary breakdown in the relationship that may persist into this year.

Analog Years An alternative view to forecast models is provided by hurricane activity in past years that had similar climate conditions to June and July this year. CSU uses this approach to qualitatively correct the output from their statistical forecast technique. Average activity over their 5 analog years of 1957, 1986, 1993, 2002 and 2009 (Table 1) indicates a below average number of named storms with slightly more major hurricanes than their official forecast.

Table 1: Atlantic seasonal hurricane forecasts as of August 15, 2014 Summary of 2014 Atlantic Seasonal Hurricane Forecasts Date # Named Storms # Hurricanes # Major Hurricanes ACE1 Data Source Issued (% of normal) (% of normal) (% of normal) (% of normal) 1981-2010 Median Value (Source CSU) 12.0 6.5 2.0 92 Average of 5 Analogue Years (Source CSU) Jul 31 2014 8.6 (72%) 3.6 (55%) 1.4 (70%) 56 (61%) Colorado State University Jul 31 2014 10.0 (83%) 4.0 (62%) 1.0 (50%) 65 (60%) NOAA/CPC Aug 7 2014 9.5 (79%) 4.5 (69%) 1.0 (50%) 60 (65%) Tropical Storm Risk Aug 5 2014 12.0 (100%) 6.0 (92%) 2.0 (100%) 70 (76%) Weather Services International July 23 2014 11.0 (92%) 5.0 (77%) 2.0 (100%) n/a Average of the all of the above Aug 15 2014 10.2 (85%) 4.6 (71%) 1.5 (75%) 63 (68%)

Climate signals: Sea surface temperatures The formation and development of hurricanes is highly dependent on the available energy in the upper layers of the ocean. That’s why sea surface temperatures are often used as a proxy for available energy as a major factor in determining seasonal activity. This year, waters over the breeding ground of the most intense hurricanes remain slightly cooler than normal (Figure 1). Given the tremendous inertia of the oceans, it is likely that these cooler waters will persist throughout the hurricane season and suppress intense hurricane development. In contrast, the East Pacific has seen warmer than normal ocean temperatures (Figure 1) and this played a major role in supporting the very active East Pacific hurricane season this year. Figure 1: Departure of from a long- term average (°C) on Aug 11 2014. NOAA/NESDIS The cool North Atlantic waters are not only cooler than normal http://www.ospo.noaa.gov/Products/ocean/sst/anomaly/index.h but also cooler than the average tropical ocean temperatures. tmlhttp://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb/atl_anom.gif) Recent research has suggested an important role for this relative measure of ocean temperature in driving hurricane activity. A North Atlantic that is warmer than the rest of the tropical oceans will tend to produce a high-level of hurricane activity whereas a cool North Atlantic relative to the rest of the tropical oceans, as we are seeing this season, will tend to suppress hurricane activity.

1Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) is a combined measure of hurricane intensity, duration and frequency. ACE is calculated as the sum of the square of the maximum wind speed in each 6-hour period during the life of a from the time it reaches tropical storm strength (wind speeds ≥ 65 kmph (39 mph)) in units of 104; ACE = 10-4∑v2max, where v is measured in knots.

Page 2 of 4

Saharan Air Layer Seasonal forecasts based on large-scale predictors such as ocean temperatures can miss important intra-seasonal features. One such phenomenon is dry and dusty air at mid-levels that can blow off North Africa and track across the tropical North Atlantic (Dunion and Velden 2004), forming what is known as the Saharan Air Layer (SAL). Tropical cyclones that are embedded in this SAL can struggle to attain named storm status as the dry warm air suffocates the initial clusters. It is also thought these bursts of dry dusty air play a major role in reducing hurricane activity over the North Atlantic compared to the North Pacific.

This year has seen a succession of SAL events that have further suppressed tropical cyclone activity on top of an already unfavorable background environment. Currently dry air extends across the entire North Figure 2: Satellite-derived snapshot of dry and dusty air (orange colors) tracking off North Africa out Atlantic (Figure 2) effectively over the tropical North Atlantic interfering with the development of thunderstorm clusters (grey putting a temporary lid on the clouds) on Aug 14, 2014. Source: Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies / main region of hurricane University of Wisconsin-Madison. development.

Climate signals: El Niño During El Niño a strong overturning of the atmosphere results in strong winds aloft over the tropical North Atlantic. Despite their strength, hurricanes have a weak spot that when exposed to these strong winds can result in rapid weakening and can even prevent hurricane formation altogether. These strong winds can blow intermittently throughout an El Niño year, meaning a strong hurricane can sneak through an El Niño year (as we saw with Hurricane Andrew).

The evolution of the climate system this year has not followed a smooth slide towards El Niño conditions. Rather, the atmosphere and ocean have failed to agree. First, the atmosphere did not follow the ocean’s lead and now the ocean is backtracking on its initial push towards El Niño. This halting progression is thought to be only a temporary setback with a final resolution of weak El Niño conditions expected by the peak of the hurricane season. The Internal Research Institute for Climate and Society predicts El Niño conditions are most likely (compared to neutral or La Niña conditions) for the remainder of 2014. If El Niño develops it will lead to further deterioration of the unsupportive conditions.

Summary All the major forecast centers continue to predict below-average hurricane activity for the remainder of the 2014 season. This consensus view using multiple forecast techniques suggests a good degree of confidence in the forecasts. U.S. landfall probability estimates continue to be low this year, though caution should be exercised due to a recent run of poor U.S. landfall forecasts.

The major climate signals included in the forecasts are cooler than average ocean temperatures over the main hurricane breeding ground and an emerging El Niño, both creating hostile conditions for hurricanes. Although El Niño has not followed a typical evolution over the past couple of months El Niño conditions are the most likely scenario for the peak of the hurricane season and we concur that below normal hurricane activity is likely this season.

Page 3 of 4 Additional advice The Willis Re Analytics Team will be reporting on all tropical storms and hurricanes in the North Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico. This includes briefings and updates to our clients during hurricane events. These will contain the latest information from the National Hurricane Center, commentary on likely tracks and intensities and, as available, updates and modeling guidance from the catastrophe modeling companies.

In addition, the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), a member of the Willis Research Network (WRN), will run real-time hurricane forecasts using a state-of-the-art research and forecasting system. The forecast track, intensity and wind fields will be made available to Willis Re clients in real-time via SpatialKey.

Information sources

Dunion, J.P., and C.S. Velden, 2004: The impact of the Saharan Air Layer on Atlantic tropical cyclone activity. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., vol. 85, no. 3, 353-365.

Klotzbach, Philip J. and W. M. Gray: “Forecast of Atlantic Seasonal Hurricane and Landfall Strike Probability for 2014”, 31st July 2014, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO, U.S. NOAA/CPC: “NOAA 2014 Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook”, 7 Aug 2014. Available at http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/outlooks/hurricane.shtml Saunders, Mark and A. Lea: “August Forecast Update for Atlantic Hurricane Activity in 2014”, 5 Aug 2014, Department of Space and Climate Physics, University College , London, UK

Contact us

Dr. James Done Geoff Saville Roy Cloutier Project Scientist and Willis Research Fellow Willis Research Network Senior Vice President Willis Re National Center for Atmospheric Research Atmospheric Hub Leader Catastrophe Modeling Services Earth System Laboratory 51 Lime Street 7760 Avenue South P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 London, EC3M 7DQ Minneapolis, MN 55435 Phone: +1 (303) 497-8209 UK Phone: +1 952 841 6652 [email protected] Phone: +44 (0) 203 124 8520 http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/people/done/ [email protected] [email protected]

Willis Limited, Registered number: 181116 England and Wales. Registered address: 51 Lime Street, London EC3M 7DQ A Lloyd’s Broker. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.

© Copyright 2014 Willis Limited / Willis Re Inc. All rights reserved: No part of this publication may be reproduced, disseminated, distributed, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted or otherwise transferred in any form or by any means, whether electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the permission of Willis Limited / Willis Re Inc. Some information contained in this document may be compiled from third party sources and we do not guarantee and are not responsible for the accuracy of such. This document is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon. Any action based on or in connection with anything contained herein should be taken only after obtaining specific advice from independent professional advisors of your choice. The views expressed in this document are not necessarily those of Willis Limited / Willis Re Inc., its parent companies, sister companies, subsidiaries or affiliates (hereinafter “Willis”). Willis is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the contents herein and expressly disclaims any responsibility or liability for the reader's application of any of the contents herein to any analysis or other matter, or for any results or conclusions based upon, arising from or in connection with the contents herein, nor do the contents herein guarantee, and should not be construed to guarantee, any particular result or outcome. Willis accepts no responsibility for the content or quality of any third party websites to which we refer.

The contents herein are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute and should not be construed as professional advice. Any and all examples used herein are for illustrative purposes only, are purely hypothetical in nature, and offered merely to describe concepts or ideas. They are not offered as solutions to produce specific results and are not to be relied upon. The reader is cautioned to consult independent professional advisors of his/her choice and formulate independent conclusions and opinions regarding the subject matter discussed herein. Willis is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the contents herein and expressly disclaims any responsibility or liability for the reader's application of any of the contents herein to any analysis or other matter, nor do the contents herein guarantee, and should not be construed to guarantee, any particular result or outcome.

Page 4 of 4