4.4 Biological Resources
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Horkelia Cuneata Assessment
Appendix C-9 Pre-Construction Botanical Surveys Pre-Construction Botanical Surveys for the Strauss Wind Energy Project Prepared for: Strauss Wind, LLC 5901 Priestly Drive, Suite 300 Carlsbad, California 92008 Contact: Daniel Duke, Vice President – Development Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Contact: Megan Enright AUGUST 2019 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Table of Contents SECTION PAGE NO. 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Location ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2 METHODS ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Spring Floristic Surveys for Special-Status Plants ................................................................................ 3 2.2 Summer Floristic Surveys for Special-Status Plants ............................................................................ 4 2.3 Gaviota Tarplant Survey Methods ......................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Horkelia Cuneata Assessment .............................................................................................................. 8 3 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................................ -
Conceptual Design Documentation
Appendix A: Conceptual Design Documentation APPENDIX A Conceptual Design Documentation June 2019 A-1 APPENDIX A: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DOCUMENTATION The environmental analyses in the NEPA and CEQA documents for the proposed improvements at Oceano County Airport (the Airport) are based on conceptual designs prepared to provide a realistic basis for assessing their environmental consequences. 1. Widen runway from 50 to 60 feet 2. Widen Taxiways A, A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 from 20 to 25 feet 3. Relocate segmented circle and wind cone 4. Installation of taxiway edge lighting 5. Installation of hold position signage 6. Installation of a new electrical vault and connections 7. Installation of a pollution control facility (wash rack) CIVIL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS The purpose of this conceptual design effort is to identify the amount of impervious surface, grading (cut and fill) and drainage implications of the projects identified above. The conceptual design calculations detailed in the following figures indicate that Projects 1 and 2, widening the runways and taxiways would increase the total amount of impervious surface on the Airport by 32,016 square feet, or 0.73 acres; a 6.6 percent increase in the Airport’s impervious surface area. Drainage patterns would remain the same as both the runway and taxiways would continue to sheet flow from their centerlines to the edge of pavement and then into open, grassed areas. The existing drainage system is able to accommodate the modest increase in stormwater runoff that would occur, particularly as soil conditions on the Airport are conducive to infiltration. Figure A-1 shows the locations of the seven projects incorporated in the Proposed Action. -
Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions............................................................................................. -
Biological Resources Assessment
Ambient Communities LLC Orcutt Area Specific Plan Project Jones and Imel Properties, San Luis Obispo County, California Biological Resources Assessment August 2014 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT ORCUTT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT JONES AND IMEL PROPERTIES, SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Ambient Communities LLC 979 Osos Street, Suite E San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Prepared by: Rincon Consultants, Inc. 1530 Monterey Street, Suite D San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 August 2014 This report was produced on 50% recycled paper with 50% post-consumer content. Orcutt Area Specific Plan Project: Jones and Imel Properties Biological Resources Assessment Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1 – Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Project Location .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 2 Section 2 – Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Regulatory Overview ............................................................................................................... -
A Sensitive Plant and Wildlife Resource Inventory of Diablo Canyon Lands, Volume Ii
A SENSITIVE PLANT AND.WILDLIFE RESOURCE INVENTORY OF DIABLO CANYON LANDS, VOLUME I: SURVEY PROCEDURES AND A SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS Prepared by: BioSystems Analysis, Inc. 303 Potrero Street, Suite 29-101 Santa Cruz, California 95060 and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Technical and Ecological Services 3400 Crow Canyon Road San Ramon, California 94583 Prepared for: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diablo Canyon Land Stewardship Committee Diablo Canyon Power Plant Avila Beach, California © 1995 by PG&E (Revised 1996) Legal Notice Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) makes no warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe upon privately owned rights. Nor does PG&E assume any liability with respect to use of, or damages resulting from the use of, any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report. © 1995 by PG&E All rights reserved EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PG&E owns or controls through long-term lease agreements approximately 10,000 acres of ecologically diverse coastal lands surrounding Diablo Canyon Power Plant in San Luis Obispo County, California. Beginning in 1992, a comprehensive survey of these lands was undertaken to identify and describe all sensitive plant and wildlife resources not previously known that might occur there. Though not required by state or federal regulatory agencies, this voluntary effort is consistent with PG&E's Corporate Policy on Management of Company Real Property (Section 7, paragraphs a and d), as well as specific Best Management Practices identified by the Diablo Canyon Land Stewardship Program (PG&E 1993a). -
Checklist of the Vascular Plants of San Diego County 5Th Edition
cHeckliSt of tHe vaScUlaR PlaNtS of SaN DieGo coUNty 5th edition Pinus torreyana subsp. torreyana Downingia concolor var. brevior Thermopsis californica var. semota Pogogyne abramsii Hulsea californica Cylindropuntia fosbergii Dudleya brevifolia Chorizanthe orcuttiana Astragalus deanei by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson San Diego Natural History Museum and San Diego State University examples of checklist taxa: SPecieS SPecieS iNfRaSPecieS iNfRaSPecieS NaMe aUtHoR RaNk & NaMe aUtHoR Eriodictyon trichocalyx A. Heller var. lanatum (Brand) Jepson {SD 135251} [E. t. subsp. l. (Brand) Munz] Hairy yerba Santa SyNoNyM SyMBol foR NoN-NATIVE, NATURaliZeD PlaNt *Erodium cicutarium (L.) Aiton {SD 122398} red-Stem Filaree/StorkSbill HeRBaRiUM SPeciMeN coMMoN DocUMeNTATION NaMe SyMBol foR PlaNt Not liSteD iN THE JEPSON MANUAL †Rhus aromatica Aiton var. simplicifolia (Greene) Conquist {SD 118139} Single-leaF SkunkbruSH SyMBol foR StRict eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §§Dudleya brevifolia (Moran) Moran {SD 130030} SHort-leaF dudleya [D. blochmaniae (Eastw.) Moran subsp. brevifolia Moran] 1B.1 S1.1 G2t1 ce SyMBol foR NeaR eNDeMic TO SaN DieGo coUNty §Nolina interrata Gentry {SD 79876} deHeSa nolina 1B.1 S2 G2 ce eNviRoNMeNTAL liStiNG SyMBol foR MiSiDeNtifieD PlaNt, Not occURRiNG iN coUNty (Note: this symbol used in appendix 1 only.) ?Cirsium brevistylum Cronq. indian tHiStle i checklist of the vascular plants of san Diego county 5th edition by Jon p. rebman and Michael g. simpson san Diego natural history Museum and san Diego state university publication of: san Diego natural history Museum san Diego, california ii Copyright © 2014 by Jon P. Rebman and Michael G. Simpson Fifth edition 2014. isBn 0-918969-08-5 Copyright © 2006 by Jon P. -
Phylogenetic Classification of Subtribe Castillejinae (Orobanchaceae)
Systematic Botany (2009), 34(1): pp. 182–197 © Copyright 2009 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Phylogenetic Classification of Subtribe Castillejinae (Orobanchaceae) David C. Tank, 1,3, 4 J. Mark Egger, 2 and Richard G. Olmstead 1,2 1 Department of Biology, University of Washington, Box 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 U.S.A. 2 Herbarium, Burke Museum of Natural History, University of Washington, Box 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 U.S.A. 3 Present Address: Department of Forest Resources and Stillinger Herbarium, University of Idaho, PO Box 441133, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1133 U.S.A. 4 Author for Correspondence ( [email protected] ) Communicating Editor: Lena Struwe Abstract— Recent molecular systematic research has indicated the need for a revised circumscription of generic boundaries in subtribe Castillejinae (tribe Pedicularideae, Orobanchaceae). Based on a well-resolved and well-supported phylogenetic hypothesis, we present a for- mal reclassification of the major lineages comprising the Castillejinae. Prior to this treatment, subtribe Castillejinae included Castilleja (ca. 190 spp.), Cordylanthus (18 spp.), Orthocarpus (9 spp.), Triphysaria (5 spp.), and the monotypic genera Clevelandia and Ophiocephalus. In the clas- sification presented here, Orthocarpus and Triphysaria retain their current circumscriptions, Castilleja is expanded to include Clevelandia and Ophiocephalus , and Cordylanthus is split into three genera; a key to the genera as they are recognized here is provided. Two new combinations, Castilleja beldingii and Castilleja ophiocephala , are proposed within the expanded Castilleja . The concept of Cordylanthus is restricted to the 13 species formerly recognized as subg. Cordylanthus , while subg. Dicranostegia and subg. Hemistegia are elevated to genus level ( Dicranostegia and Chloropyron , respectively). -
All BLM CALIFORNIA SPECIAL STATUS PLANTS
All BLM CALIFORNIA SPECIAL STATUS PLANTS Thursday, May 28, 2015 11:00:38 AM CA RARE PLANT RANK RECOVERY PLAN? PALM SPRINGS MOTHER LODE GLOBAL RANK NNPS STATUSNNPS BAKERSFIELD BLM STATUS RIDGECREST STATE RANK FED STATUS EAGLE LAKE NV STATUS EL CENTRO CA STATUS HOLLISTER TYPE BARSTOW SURPRISE REDDING ALTURAS NEEDLES ARCATA OF DATE BISHOP SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME PLANT FAMILY UPDATED COMMENTS UKIAH Abronia umbellata var. pink sand-verbena VASC Nyctaginaceae BLMS 1B.1 G4G5T2 S1 No 29-Apr-13 Formerly subsp. breviflora (Standl.) K breviflora Munz. Abronia villosa var. aurita chaparral sand-verbena VASC Nyctaginaceae BLMS 1B.1 G5T3T4 S2 No 06-Aug-13 CNDDB occurrences 2 and 91 are on S K BLM lands in the Palm Springs Field Office. Acanthomintha ilicifolia San Diego thornmint VASC Lamiaceae FT SE 1B.1 G1 S2 No 12-Mar-15 Status changed from "K" to "S" on S 8/6/2013. Naomi Fraga was unable to find the species on BLM lands when trying to collect seeds in 2012. Although there are several CNDDB occurences close to BLM lands, none of these actually intersect with BLM lands. Acanthoscyphus parishii Cushenberry oxytheca VASC Polygonaceae FE 1B.1 G4?T1 S1 No 06-Aug-13 Formerly Oxytheca parishii var. K var. goodmaniana goodmaniana. Name change based on Reveal, J.L. 2004. Nomenclatural summary of Polygonaceae subfamily Eriogonoideae. Harvard Papers in Botany 9(1):144. A draft Recovery Plan was issued in 1997 but as of 8/6/2013 was not final. Some of the recovery actions in the draft plan have been started and partially implemented. -
Habitat and Population Monitoring for Chloropyron Maritimum Ssp
Habitat and population monitoring for Chloropyron maritimum ssp. palustre and Limonium californicum on the Coos Bay North Spit Report to the Bureau of Land Management, 2016 Coos Bay District Report prepared by Denise E.L. Giles, Erin C. Gray, Matt A. Bahm, and Thomas N. Kaye Institute for Applied Ecology PREFACE This report is the result of an agreement between the Institute for Applied Ecology (IAE) and a federal agency. IAE is a non-profit organization whose mission is conservation of native ecosystems through restoration, research and education. Our aim is to provide a service to public and private agencies and individuals by developing and communicating information on ecosystems, species, and effective management strategies and by conducting research, monitoring, and experiments. IAE offers educational opportunities through 3-4 month internships. Our current activities are concentrated on rare and endangered plants and invasive species. Questions regarding this report or IAE should be directed to: Matt Bahm Conservation Research Program Director Institute for Applied Ecology 563 SW Jefferson Avenue Corvallis, Oregon 97333 phone: 541-753-3099 fax: 541-753-3098 email: [email protected] ii Chloropyron maritimum ssp. palustre and Limonium californicum, 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author gratefully acknowledges the cooperation in 2016 provided by the Coos Bay District BLM, particularly Jennie Sperling; IAE staff Michelle Allen, Meaghan Petix; IAE/Native Plant Society of Oregon interns Sarai Carter, Ariana Freitag and Liza Holtz; and Saturday Academy Apprentice in Science and Engineering Nicholas Murray. We would also like to thank Kelli VanNorman, ISSSP coordinator, for her continued support and funding for this project. Cover photograph: Chloropyron maritimum ssp. -
Scrophulariaceae) and Hemiparasitic Orobanchaceae (Tribe Rhinantheae) with Emphasis on Reticulate Evolution
Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Fakultät für Biologie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Evolutionary history and biogeography of the genus Scrophularia (Scrophulariaceae) and hemiparasitic Orobanchaceae (tribe Rhinantheae) with emphasis on reticulate evolution vorgelegt von Agnes Scheunert München, Dezember 2016 II Diese Dissertation wurde angefertigt unter der Leitung von Prof. Dr. Günther Heubl an der Fakultät für Biologie, Department I, Institut für Systematische Botanik und Mykologie an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Günther Heubl Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Jochen Heinrichs Tag der Abgabe: 15.12.2016 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 22.03.2017 III IV Eidesstattliche Versicherung und Erklärung Eidesstattliche Versicherung Ich, Agnes Scheunert, versichere hiermit an Eides statt, daß die vorgelegte Dissertation von mir selbständig und ohne unerlaubte Hilfe angefertigt ist. München, den 14.12.2016 ______________________________________ Agnes Scheunert Erklärung Diese Dissertation wurde im Sinne von § 12 der Promotionsordnung von Prof. Dr. Günther Heubl betreut. Hiermit erkläre ich, Agnes Scheunert, dass die Dissertation nicht ganz oder in wesentlichen Teilen einer anderen Prüfungskommission vorgelegt worden ist, und daß ich mich anderweitig einer Doktorprüfung ohne Erfolg nicht unterzogen habe. München, den 14.12.2016 ______________________________________ Agnes Scheunert V VI Declaration of author contribution In this cumulative thesis, -
Queen of Angels Bio Assessment
David Magney Environmental Consulting BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF QUEEN OF ANGELS CHURCH LOMPOC, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA OFFICE OF PLANNINGAND DEVELOPMENT On behalf of: CRC ENTERPRISES JANUARY 2013 Mission Statement To provide quality environmental consulting services with integrity that protect and enhance the human and natural environment www.magney.org DMEC Biological Assessment of Queen of Angels Church Lompoc, California Prepared for: County of Santa Barbara Office of Planning and Development 123 East Anapamu Street Santa Barbara, CA 93001 Contact: Doug Anthony, Deputy Director (North County) Phone: 805/568-2046 On behalf of: CRC Enterprises 27600 Bouquet Canyon Road Santa Clarita, California 91350 Prepared by: David Magney Environmental Consulting P.O. Box 1346 Ojai, CA 93024-1346 Contact: David L. Magney 805/646-6045 22 January 2013 www.magney.org This document should be cited as: David Magney Environmental Consulting. 2013. Biological Assessment for Queen of Angels Church, Lompoc, California. 22 January 2013 v1.2. (PN 12-0101) Ojai, California. Prepared for County of Santa Barbara Office Planning and Development, Santa Barbara, California. Prepared on behalf of CRC Enterprises, Santa Clarita, California. CRC Enterprises – Queen of Angels Church Biological Assessment Project No. 12-0101 22 January 2013 DMEC Page i Table of Contents Page SUMMARY............................................................................................................ 1 SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION FOOTPRINT DESCRIPTION..................... -
Rare Plant Propagation and Reintroduction
Rare Plant Propagation and Reintroduction Questions and Considerations for Natural and Historic Resources Lands in New Jersey New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Parks and Forestry Office of Natural Lands Management [Type here] May 2021 Rare Plant Propagation and Reintroduction: Questions and Considerations for Natural and Historic Resources Lands in New Jersey By Elizabeth K. Olson New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection New Jersey Forest Service Office of Natural Lands Management The author wishes to acknowledge the following persons who contributed to this manuscript: Elena Williams, Robert J. Cartica, Dr. Jay F. Kelly, Jason Hafstad, Roman Senyk, Lee Minicuci. This report should be cited as follows: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. 2021. Rare Plant Propagation and Reintroduction: Questions and Considerations for Natural and Historic Resources Lands in New Jersey. New Jersey Forest Service, Office of Natural Lands Management. 77 p. Cover Landscape Photo: Webbs Mill Bog by Kathleen Walz Cover Inset Photo: Bog Asphodel (Narthecium americanum) by Jason Hafstad Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 2 2. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Purpose of this Document ...........................................................................................................