DOCSLIB.ORG

The Apollo Spacecraft Chronology, Takes up the Story Where the First Left Off, in November 1962

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Apollo Spacecraft Chronology, Takes up the Story Where the First Left Off, in November 1962 A CHRONOLOGY NASA SP-4009 THE APOLLO SPACECRAFT A CHRONOLOGY VOLUME II November 8, 1962--September 80, 1964 by Mary Louise Morse and Jean Kernahan Bays THE NASA HISTORICAL SERIES Scientific and Technical ln[ormation Office 1973 /LS.P,. / NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Washington, D.C. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Price $3.20 Stock Number 3300-0455 (Paper Cover) Library o] Congress Catalog Card Number 69-60008 FOREWORD This, tile second volume of the Apollo Spacecraft Chronology, takes up the story where the first left off, in November 1962. The first volume dealt with the birth of the Apollo Program and traced its early development. The second concerns its teenage period, up to September 30, 1964. By late 1962 the broad conceptual design of the Apollo spacecraft and the Apollo lunar landing mission was complete. The Administrator formally advised the President of the United States on December 10 that NASA had selected lunar orbit rendezw)us over direct ascent and earth orbit rendezvous as the mode for landing on the moon. All major spacecraft contractors had been selected; detailed system design and early developmental testing were under way. On October 20, 1962, soon after Wally Schirra's six-orbit mission in .Sigma 7, the first formal overall status review of the Apollo spacecraft and flight mission effort was given to Administrator James E. _Vebb. The writer of this foreword, who was then the Assistant Director for Apollo Spacecraft Development, recalls George Low, then Director of Manned Spacecraft and Flight Missions trader D. Brainerd Holmes, discussing the planning schedule for completion of the Merct, ry Project in 1963, initiation of Gemini flights in 1964, and the start of Apollo earth orbital flights in 1965. Major design features of the spacecraft and subsystems were discussed and so were facilities, training, flight mission plans, and resources. At the conclusion of the review, Mr. _,Vebb, I)r. Dryden, and Dr. Seamans commented faw)rably on the over- view provided and on the accomplishments and hard planning that had been completed. The chronology of events during the subsequent two years, as summarized herein, provides an interesting comparison with the plans as discussed that day; we came very close to what was planned for 196.8 and 1964. During 1963 formal contract negotiations with the previously selected major spacecraft contractors were completed. In addition most of the con- tractors for major facilities and support activities on the ground were selected. The latter group included Radio Corporation of America to fur- nish the spacecraft vacumn test chamber at Houston, Bell Aerosystems for the lunar landing training vehicle, Philco Corporation as prime contractor for the Mission Control (-;enter, I.ink Division of General Precision, Inc., for the lunar mission simulators, and International Business Machines for the Real Time Computer Complex at Houston's Mission Control Center. Also in 1963 the Office of bianned Space Flight was reorganized under its new leader, George E. Mueller, to strengthen its systems engineering and integration role in overall management of the Apollo-Saturn Program. In °o. 111 THE APOLI,O SPACECRAFT" A CHRONOLOGY December Dr. Mueller brought in General Sam Phillips as Deputy Director of the Apollo Program. Soon thereafter Phillips was named Apollo Program Director. A comparable reorganization took place at the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston as the tempo of spacecraft module design and develop- ment increased. At the same time, the prime contractors were selecting and completing negotiations with their subcontractors and suppliers for the thousands of subsystems and components involved. The government-indus- try team for carrying out the Apollo spacecraft and flight mission related tasks was essentially complete by late 1!_63. Concurrently, similar activities were proceeding for the Saturn launch _ehicles at the Marshall Space Flight (]enter and for launch site preparation at the Kennedy Space Center, as it was named by President Johnson on November 28, 1963. Meanwhile, a series of basic program decisions were made; these enabled the spacecraft and lunar landing mission design teams to proceed into detail design. Among these decisions were the tollowing: • Nominal earth landing would be on the water. This was a change fr¢nn the original plan which provided for earth landing in either Australia or the southwestern United States. The change was made primarily to take advantage of the softer impact conditions afforded by water landing, al- though the operational flexibility afforded by ocean landing was an addi- tional favorable factor. • CSM to LM transposition and docking would be by the free flying mode. This meant that, after injection int_> translunar trajectory, the crew would detach the CSM from its launch position and would rotate the space- craft 180 ° and manually maneuver it into a docked position with the LM. • The crew would operate the I_M from standing position. • The spacecraft guidance comt)uter would use micrologic design. • The Lunar Module would have a four-legged, deployable landing gear. This was a change from the original (;rumman configuration which had five legs. • _l'he l_unar Module would be capable of supporting the effective operation of two men on the hmar surl_,e for up to 24 hours, plus 24 hours in ttight. At the same time, rapid progress was made on the development of the spacecraft, on the Saturn launch vehicles, and on the facilities to support them. Typical events in 1!)63 included: • The service propulsion prototype engine successfidly completed initial firings. • The first of a number of parachute malfunctions occurred during development drop tests. • Tire impact test facility for devel_>pment and verification ot: the Command Module landing system at the North American plant in Downey, California, was completed. • Flight of Saturn SA-4 verified the capability of the Saturn first stage to operate satisfactorily after a simulated in-tlight failure of one engine. iv FOREWORD • The Little Joe II launch complex at White Sands was completed and the first Little Joe II test article was launched successfully. • The LM-I hmar module mockup was completed. • Prototype fuel cells were delivered by Pratt gc Whitney to North American. • The first pad abort test was successfully completed at White Sands. • The J-2 engine successfully completed its initial long duration firing. The Mercury Program ended with Gordon Cooper's 34-hour earth orbit mission on May 15-16, 1963, the unmanned Lunar Orbiter Project was approved, and scientific guidelines for the Apollo mission were promulgated. A new group of 14 astronauts, including Buzz Aldrin and Mike Collins, who were destined to join Nell Armstrong in the first hmar landing mission, was selected in October 196.3. Dr. Mueller, in the fall of 1963, introduced something that was to have a mighty effect on "landing before this decade is out." It was called "all-up testing." Under the "all-up" concept, launch vehicle and spacecraft develop- merit flights were combined, with all elements active and as close to lunar configuration as possible, beginning with the very first flight. This plan replaced the more conventional approach of making initial launch vehicle tests with dummy upper stages and dummy spacecraft. Because the Saturn I flight program was of an interim non-hmar con- figuration, it was curtailed and four manned earth orbital flights with the Saturn I launch vehicle were canceled. The Saturn IB development for manned flight was accelerated and all Saturn IB flights, beginning with SA-201, would carry operational spacecraft. Similarly, the Saturn V develop- ment flights, beginning with 501, would be in "all-up" configuration and vehicle 501 would be used to obtain reentry data on the Apollo spacecraft. The first manned flight on both the Saturn IB and V would follow two successful unmanned flights, so that the first manned flights could be as early as vehicles 20'_ and 503 for the IB and V, respectively. This would exploit early successful flight operation of the new launch vehicles by re- ducing the total number of flights required to qualify the lunar flight con- figuration for manned operations. The first manned flight on a Saturn V did of course take place on vehicle 503 in December 1968--the successful Apollo 8 mission. Another Mueller innovation was the Apollo Executives Group, which first met in the fall of 1963. It brought together senior officials of the major Apollo-Saturn contractors, such as the Presidents of North American, Boe- ing, add Grumman, with senior NASA Manned Space Flight executives (Mueller, von Braun, (;ilruth, and Debus). These periodic meetings proved to be an excellent mechanism for opening lines of communication at the top, for assuring timely top management attention to the most important problems as they arose, and for assuring a coordinated tqam effort on the many faceted Apollo-Saturn activities. A similar group of Gemini Execu- tives was also set up; there was considerable cross-communication between V THE APOLLO SPACECRAFT: A CHRONOLOGY the two since several of the same organizations were involved in both pro- grams. During 1964 ground and flight development activity accelerated further and the first of many tlight components, the launch escape rockets built by the I,ockheed Propulsion (_ompany, successfully completed qualification testing. In early 1964, the Block II CSM lmdar-orbit-rendezvous configuration guidelines were forwarded by NASA m North American, and the Block II mockup was formally reviewed in September of that year. The Block I configuration had been configured before the I_OR mode was chosen; as a consequence, it did not have the docking and crew-transfer provisions which, among other changes, were incorporated in the Block II. The first Gemini mission, a successful unto,tuned test flight, was launched on April 8.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Charles Darwin: a Companion
    CHARLES DARWIN: A COMPANION Charles Darwin aged 59. Reproduction of a photograph by Julia Margaret Cameron, original 13 x 10 inches, taken at Dumbola Lodge, Freshwater, Isle of Wight in July 1869. The original print is signed and authenticated by Mrs Cameron and also signed by Darwin. It bears Colnaghi's blind embossed registration. [page 3] CHARLES DARWIN A Companion by R. B. FREEMAN Department of Zoology University College London DAWSON [page 4] First published in 1978 © R. B. Freeman 1978 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the permission of the publisher: Wm Dawson & Sons Ltd, Cannon House Folkestone, Kent, England Archon Books, The Shoe String Press, Inc 995 Sherman Avenue, Hamden, Connecticut 06514 USA British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Freeman, Richard Broke. Charles Darwin. 1. Darwin, Charles – Dictionaries, indexes, etc. 575′. 0092′4 QH31. D2 ISBN 0–7129–0901–X Archon ISBN 0–208–01739–9 LC 78–40928 Filmset in 11/12 pt Bembo Printed and bound in Great Britain by W & J Mackay Limited, Chatham [page 5] CONTENTS List of Illustrations 6 Introduction 7 Acknowledgements 10 Abbreviations 11 Text 17–309 [page 6] LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Charles Darwin aged 59 Frontispiece From a photograph by Julia Margaret Cameron Skeleton Pedigree of Charles Robert Darwin 66 Pedigree to show Charles Robert Darwin's Relationship to his Wife Emma 67 Wedgwood Pedigree of Robert Darwin's Children and Grandchildren 68 Arms and Crest of Robert Waring Darwin 69 Research Notes on Insectivorous Plants 1860 90 Charles Darwin's Full Signature 91 [page 7] INTRODUCTION THIS Companion is about Charles Darwin the man: it is not about evolution by natural selection, nor is it about any other of his theoretical or experimental work.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2020
    FEBRUARY 2020 THE MAGAZINE YOU COME HOME TO Rethinking rural health care New approach to control costs, improve health PLUS Increase thermal mass Quick-fix soups Rapidly aging gardener SUPER COUPON SUPER COUPON OVER 5,000 1,000+ Cu 5st STARomer REVIEWS Rating FREEANY SUPER COUPON 15,000 cu. in. of storage 700 lb. capacity Heavy duty locking casters 20% Cu stomer Rating OF 7 COLORS ALL IN A SINGLE ANY 99 SINGLE ITEM* $ 199 COMPARE TO PERFORMANCE $ 52 ITEM 63878/63991 OFF* 95260878 * 13 64005/60566 $ 99 TOOL 95 2 6 0 8 7 8 $ 63601/ 67227 shown Limit 1 coupon per customer per day. Save 20% on any 1 item purchased. *Cannot be used with 229 SAVE 630 other discount, coupon or any of the following items or brands: Inside Track Club membership, * 95260719 * Extended Service Plan, gift card, open box item, 3 day Parking Lot Sale item, compressors, fl oor jacks, safes, storage cabinets, chests or carts, trailers, welders, Admiral, Ames, Atlas, COMPARE TO $ 95 2 6 0 7 1 9 * 95260560 * Snap-On Bauer, Central Machinery, Cobra, CoverPro, Daytona, Diamondback, Earthquake, Fischer, Item 64031, 56429, 64033, 64059 , 95 2 6 0 5 6 0 830 Cannot be used with other discounts or prior purchases. Original coupon must be presented. Hercules, Icon, Jupiter, Lynxx, Poulan, Predator, Tailgator, Viking, Vulcan, Zurich. Not valid on Valid through 4/15/20 while supplies last. Limit 1 FREE GIFT per customer per day. prior purchases. Non-transferable. Original coupon must be presented. Valid through 4/15/20. 64721, 64722, 64720 LIMIT 1 - Coupon valid
    [Show full text]
  • Shroudlines Vol 13 Issue 1 11X17.Pub
    DARS NAR Section #308 SHROUDLINES Jan/Feb 2004 A Newsletter of the Dallas Area Rocket Society Volume 13, Issue 1 Dallas Area Rocket Society (“DARS”) In Memory of Beth Sapp By James Gartrell This issue of Shroudlines is devoted to Beth Sapp, loving and devoted wife of Tim Sapp, and loving and devoted mother of her two sons whom she loved so dearly, Alex and Eric. Although Beth has left this physical world, she will always remain in our hearts and minds. I know I speak for everyone from DARS when I say our deepest sympathies go Member - National Association out to Tim, Alex and Eric, and the rest of of Rocketry (“NAR”). their family. They will forever remain in my prayers, and I think that’s what Beth would want us all to do. Special points of interest: • In Memory of Beth Sapp - This Beth was also a dear friend and a wonderful Valwood Branch at: 13940 N. Stemmons Freeway, Suite A, Farmers Branch, TX 75234 issue is devoted to the memory person, DARS member and certified Level 2, of Beth Sapp. The first three Telephone (972) 406-1116, Fax (972) 406-9998, www.kinkos.com and much more. I don’t think there are pages include remembrances enough words or the right words to truly and photos of Beth. memorialize a person as special as Beth was, • Currently planned Launches, even though I’ve had a long time to think Outreach, and Contest Events about it since her funeral on January 24. The Dallas Area Rocket Society for 2004 are listed.
    [Show full text]
  • APOLLO EXPERIENCE REPORT - THERMAL PROTECTION SUBSYSTEM by Jumes E
    NASA TECHNICAL NOTE NASA TN D-7564 w= ro VI h d z c Q rn 4 z t APOLLO EXPERIENCE REPORT - THERMAL PROTECTION SUBSYSTEM by Jumes E. Puulosky und Leslie G, St. Leger Ly12d012 B. Johlzson Space Center Honst0~2, Texus 77058 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, 0. C. JANUARY 1974 ~--_. - .. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. D-7564 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 1974 APOLLOEXPERIENCEREPORT THERMAL PROTECTION SUBSYSTEM 6. Performing Organization Code I 7. Author(s) I 8. Performing Organization Report No. JSC S-383 James E. Pavlosky and Leslie G. St. Leger, JSC 10. Work Unit No. I 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 11. Contract or Grant No. Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas 77058 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 14. Sponsoring Agency Code National Aeronautics and SDace Administration Washington, D. C. 20546 1 15. Supplementary Notes The JSC Director waived the use of the International System of Units (SI) for this Apollo Experienc Report because, in his judgment, the use of SI units would impair the usefulness of th'e report or result in excessive cost. 16. Abstract The Apollo command module was the first manned spacecraft to be designed to enter the atmos- phere of the earth at lunar-return velocity, and the design of the thermal protection subsystem for the resulting entry environment presented a major technological challenge. Brief descrip- tions of the Apollo command module thermal design requirements and thermal protection con- figuration, and some highlights of the ground and flight testing used for design verification of the system are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparation of Papers for AIAA Technical Conferences
    Thermal Protection Systems Technology Transfer from Apollo and Space Shuttle to the Orion Program Michael Stewart 1 Lockheed Martin, Kennedy Space Center, Florida, 32899 and William J. Koenig2 NASA Kennedy Space Center, Florida, 32899 and Richard F. Harris 3 NASA Kennedy Space Center, Florida, 32899 This paper describes how the Orion program is utilizing the Thermal Protection System (TPS) experience from the Apollo and Space Shuttle programs to reduce program risk and improve affordability to meet NASA’s future manned exploration missions. The Orion program successfully completed the Exploration Flight Test (EFT-1) mission in 2014 and is currently assembling, integrating, and testing the next spacecraft for the Exploration Mission (EM-1) to meet the flight test objectives of an unmanned orbital mission to the moon and return to earth in 2019. The Orion spacecraft production operations are located in the Neil Armstrong Operations and Checkout (O&C) facility at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) providing an affordable and seamless delivery approach of vehicles directly to the launch site eliminating spacecraft transportation and additional checkout testing. Innovative vehicle design, manufacturing and test operations approaches are maturing and evolving with each Orion vehicle build to support the challenging NASA exploration mission requirements beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO) while reducing program cost and schedule impacts. An example of Orion’s evolution is the incorporation of an improved heat shield design, assembly and testing approach to meet the higher re-entry velocities for a lunar return for the EM-1 mission. The EFT- 1 heat shield was based on the Apollo heat shield manufacturing processes and was assembled at a supplier location and then transported to KSC for final integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Emotional Intelligence
    O L O R A D AerospaceO S T E M M A G A Z i N E Orion Lockheed Martin Colorado E.I. Emotional Intelligence Apollopalooza 2019 July \\022v “An Experience for Everyone” Colorado Aerospace STEM Magazine believes that the key to success in seeing higher graduation rates, improved test- Orion Test ing results, student inspiration, creativity, Lockheed Martin excitement and career satisfaction rests in the hands of the teacher. The example and inspiration of individual educators carries tremendous weight on a daily basis, great- ly impacting the quality and effectiveness of the classroom environment. STEM Teaching Career Hill Our mission: Encourage curiosity, Betsy investigation, inspiration, creativity, and innovation; the foundations of every career passion and career in the Colorado workforce. STEM Careers of Tomorrow Laron Walker Wayne Carley Publisher Unlimited distribution is permitted to everyone receiving Colorado Aerospace Emotional Intelligence STEM Magazine. Please feel free to share Pat Kozyra with educators, students, parents and in- terested individuals or organizations. Colorado Aerospace STEM Magazine strives to encourage the educator to better STEM Tools Delights understand the importance of STEM skills, Estes, Boucvalt, their use in every school subject, the need Bryce Cathy and ease of integration into curriculum Steve Curtis, and Bruce Camber and the urgency for students to embrace STEM. To find out more, please send your E-mail request to: Apollopalooza [email protected] Lockheed Martin Orionwww.lockheedmartin.com This month, NASA will test the Orion’s The AA-2 test will last less than three launch abort system (LAS) for the final minutes, but the mock-up module will time, and the team charged with keep- reach up to 31,000 feet at more than 1,000 ing the crew safe from injury during the mph (Mach 1.3) before the LAS fires and most severe phases of space flight will be separates the module from the booster.
    [Show full text]
  • Heat Flux at a Point on the Vehicle (W/Cm2)
    Entry Aerothermodynamics • Review of basic fuid parameters • Heating rate parameters • Stagnation point heating • Heating on vehicle surfaces • Slides from 2012 NASA Termal and Fluids Analysis Workshop: https://tfaws.nasa.gov/TFAWS12/Proceedings/ Aerothermodynamics%20Course.pdf © 2016 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu U N I V E R S I T Y O F Entry Aerothermodynamics MARYLAND ENAE 791 - Launch and Entry Vehicle Design1 Background 2 • The kinetic energy of an entry vehicle is dissipated by transformation into thermal energy (heat) as the entry system decelerates • The magnitude of this thermal energy is so large that if all of this energy were transferred to the entry system it would be severely damaged and likely vaporize – Harvey Allen - the blunt body concept • Only a small fraction of this thermal energy is transferred to the entry system – The thermal transfer fraction is dependant on vehicle shape, size, aerodynamic regime and velocity – Near peak heating, 1% to 5% of the total thermal energy is transferred to the entry system – Example: at the peak heating point the freestream energy transfer for 1 3 2 2 Pathfinder was q Ý Ñ = 2 r V ~ 4 , 000 W/cm but only about 110 W/cm (2.7%) was actually transferred to the surface Example 3 E V2 Energy density: = + g h m 2 o V E/m Entry (km/s) (MJ/kg) MER 5.6 16 Note that: Apollo 11.4 66 Water boils @ 2.3 MJ/kg Carbon vaporizes @ 60.5 MJ/kg Mars 14.0 98 Return Galileo 47.4 1130 In each case goh is about 1% of total Side Note: What Can We Test? 4 Missions of Interest Live here Blunt Body Rationale 5 • Why is a blunt body used for planetary entry? – Slender body: low drag, highly maneuverable – Blunt body: high drag, not very maneuverable • Blunt bodies generate strong shock waves – Efficient energy dissipation.
    [Show full text]
  • Obituaries, A
    OBITUARIES, A - K Updated 7/31/2020 Bernardsville Library Local History Room NAME TITLE DATE OF DEATH SOURCE EDITION PAGE AGE NOTES NJ Archives Abstract & Aaron, Robert 01/13/1802 Wills Vol.X 1801-1805 7 Abantanzo, Marie 01/13/1923 Bernardsville News 01/18/1923 4 Abbate, Michael 06/22/1955 Bernardsville News 06/23/1955 1 Abberman, Jay 04/10/2005 Bernardsville News 04/14/2005 10 82 Abbey, E. Mrs. 06/02/1957 Bernardsville News 06/06/1957 4 Abbond, Doris Weakley 03/27/2000 Bernardsville News 03/30/2000 10 80 Abbond, Robert R. 02/09/1995 Bernardsville News 02/15/1995 10 82 Abbondanzo, Delores L. 11/03/2001 Bernardsville News 11/08/2001 11 75 Abbondanzo, Francis J. 12/26/1993 Bernardsville News 12/29/1993 10 69 Abbondanzo, L. Mrs. 12/22/1962 Bernardsville News 01/03/1963 2 Abbondanzo, Lena I. 05/08/2003 Bernardsville News 05/15/2003 10 80 Abbondanzo, Louis 12/23/1979 Bernardsville News 01/03/1980 6 89 Abbondanzo, Louis J. 12/25/1993 Bernardsville News 12/29/1993 10 65 Abbondanzo, Mary G. 06/12/2014 Bernardsville News 06/26/2014 8 88 Abbondanzo, Patricia A. 11/21/1983 Bernardsville News 11/24/1983 Abbondanzo, Patrick J. 12/11/2000 Bernardsville News 12/14/2000 10 78 Abbondanzo, Rose 12/22/1962 Bernardsville News 01/03/1963 2 63 Abbondanzo, Sharon J. 08/28/2013 Bernardsville News 09/05/2013 9 78 Abbondanzo, Vincent J. 07/26/1996 Bernardsville News 07/31/1996 10 66 Abbott, Charles Cortez Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Rescue Ensuring the Safety of Manned Space¯Ight David J
    Space Rescue Ensuring the Safety of Manned Space¯ight David J. Shayler Space Rescue Ensuring the Safety of Manned Spaceflight Published in association with Praxis Publishing Chichester, UK David J. Shayler Astronautical Historian Astro Info Service Halesowen West Midlands UK Front cover illustrations: (Main image) Early artist's impression of the land recovery of the Crew Exploration Vehicle. (Inset) Artist's impression of a launch abort test for the CEV under the Constellation Program. Back cover illustrations: (Left) Airborne drop test of a Crew Rescue Vehicle proposed for ISS. (Center) Water egress training for Shuttle astronauts. (Right) Beach abort test of a Launch Escape System. SPRINGER±PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION SUBJECT ADVISORY EDITOR: John Mason, B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D. ISBN 978-0-387-69905-9 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Springer is part of Springer-Science + Business Media (springer.com) Library of Congress Control Number: 2008934752 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those terms should be sent to the publishers. # Praxis Publishing Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2009 Printed in Germany The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a speci®c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orion Launch Abort System
    Constellation Program: Astronaut Safety in a Launch Emergency The Orion Launch Abort System When astronauts rocket to the moon notice and setting the stage for a safe aboard NASA’s Orion crew exploration landing. vehicle, they will lift off in a spacecraft that can escape safely should a malfunction in Making its first flights early in the next the launch vehicle occur. decade, the Orion/Ares I launch system is being developed by the Constellation The Orion launch abort system (LAS) will Program as it prepares to send human offer a safe, reliable method of pulling the explorers back to the moon, and then entire crew out of danger in the event of an onward to Mars and other destinations in emergency on the launch pad or during the the solar system. climb to Earth orbit. Mounted at the top of the Orion and Ares Launch Abort Sequence I launch vehicle stack, the abort system will be capable of automatically separating the If a launch pad or in-flight emergency spacecraft from the rocket at a moment’s occurs, the abort and attitude control Orion’s launch abort system is designed to pull the crew module to safety in an emergency. motors will ignite, pulling the Orion crew module safely free of the Ares I launch vehicle. Th e abort motor will generate 400,000 pounds of thrust in a Nose Cone fraction of a second, rapidly pulling the crew to safety while the attitude control motors maintain stability. Attitude Control Motor (Eight Nozzles) After the vehicle is safely away from the booster, the attitude control motor will reorient the capsule before the crew module is released from the abort system to Interstage begin its controlled descent.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Flight Assessment of Avcoat Thermal Protection System for The
    Post-Flight Assessment of Avcoat Thermal Protection System for the Exploration Flight Test-1 Deepak Bose, Jose Santos, Erika Rodriguez, Milad Mahzari, Brian Remark, and Suman Muppidi NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX On December 5, 2014 NASA conducted the first flight test of its next generation human-class Orion spacecraft. The flight was called the Exploration Flight Test -1 (EFT-1) which lasted for 4 hours and culminated into a re-entry trajectory at 9 km/s. This flight test of the 5-meter Orion Crew Module demonstrated various sub-systems including the Avcoat ablative thermal protection system (TPS) on the heat shield. The Avcoat TPS had been developed from the Apollo-era recipe with a few key modifications. The engineering for thermal sizing was supported by modeling, analysis, and ground tests in arc jet facilities. This paper will describe a postlfight analysis plan and present results from post-recovery inspections, data analysis from embedded sensors, TPS sample extraction and characterization in the laboratory. After the recovery of the vehicle, a full photographic survey and surface scans of the TPS were performed. The recovered vehicle showed physical evidence of flow disturbances, varying degrees of surface roughness, and excessive recession downstream of compression pads. The TPS recession was measured at more than 200 locations of interest on the Avcoat surface. The heat shield was then processed for sample extraction prior to TPS removal using the 7-Axis Milling machine at Marshall Space Flight Center. Around 182 rectangular TPS samples were extracted for subsequent analysis and investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Hurtgen's Study of Sulfur Cycling in the Neoproterozoic
    Greetings from Locy Hall, home of following projects: Matthew Hurtgen’s study of sulfur cycling in the NU’s Department of Earth and Plane- Neoproterozoic, Steven Jacobsen’s acquisition of a broadband oscil- tary Sciences! It gives me great pleasure loscope, and Francesca Smith’s paleohydrological investigation of to update you, the alumni and friends of the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. Further, Andy and Steve the department, on the many interesting both await decisions on their NSF-CAREER grant proposals, and developments that have recently taken place within our scholarly Steve was just named a distinguished lecturer by the Mineralogical community. In the past year, the department has continued to build Society of America. upon the momentum established by several signifi cant changes I Activity within the senior ranks of the faculty has matched the have previously detailed for you—including the appointment of hectic pace of our junior faculty members. Craig Bina, in particular fi ve promising new faculty members, the implementation of a has been very busy lately. After spending much of the past academic new undergraduate curriculum, year in Japan as a visiting schol- and the initiation of a new fi eld ar at the University of Tokyo’s trip program—making the past Earthquake Research Institute twelve months an exciting time and the Geodynamics Research for our faculty and students. Institute at Ehime University, he Before I begin recounting became WCAS associate dean the recent activities of our de- for research and graduate studies partment members, though, let upon returning to the U.S. Two me once again extend a resound- other faculty members recently ing thank you for last year’s earned impressive honors: Seth unprecedented level of alumni Stein was named William Deer- giving.
    [Show full text]