DOCSLIB.ORG

Arc De La Villette Competition Entry, 1982, Original Image Cropped

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OMA, Parc de la Villette competition entry, 1982, original image cropped, http://oma.eu/projects/parc­de­la­villette ARC 201: Design Studio 3: Process, Process, Process SYLLABUS ­ FALL 2018 CREDITS 6 CLASS HOURS MWF 1:00 pm – 4:20 pm 1 2018 ARC201 Syllabus INSTRUCTORS Mustafa Faruki mustafa@thelab­lab.com Crosby 120 Julia Jamrozik (coordinator) [email protected] Crosby 101 Virginia Melnyk [email protected] Crosby 110 Nellie Niespodzinski [email protected] Crosby 160 Sasson Rafailov [email protected] Crosby 130 Jon Spielman [email protected] Crosby 150 ELIGIBILITY ARC102: Architectural Design Studio. Architecture majors only. PREREQUISITES/COREQUISITES ARC311: Architectural Media 3 ­ required. ARC 241: Environmental Systems – recommended. These courses will be linked in content and schedule. COURSE DESCRIPTION How do we design? What drives ideas and what generates concepts? How do we productively and critically engage with the vast history and contemporary practice of architecture in the process? How do we design places that are rooted in their location but reflective of the past and aspiring to a better future? How do we meld idealism with practicality? This studio will not offer answers to all of these questions but it will introduce one methodology and prompt a self­conscious and introspective approach to the design process. The studio is guided by ideas of morphology and context. Morphology is understood as form­finding or the deliberate, logical and well­argumented development of a formal strategy. Context is understood as the relation to site at different scales and through different lenses (physical, social, cultural) and includes the history of the discipline of architecture. These themes will be explored primarily through the study of precedents, through the process of abstraction, through interpretation and finally through iterative application onto an assigned site and program. Through this approach the class will offer students a link between analytical, experiential and strategic forms of design. The studio is divided into several parts, all of which are linked and relevant to oneanother. The process matters as much as the final product of the studio. 2 2018 ARC201 Syllabus Emphasizing the value of curiosity , risk­taking and independent critical thinking , the concepts developed in the studio will be augmented through an emphasis on skill­building and experimentation. Part 1­3 In the first weeks of the semester we will be looking at examples of built houses with three different objectives/lenses of focus: those of organization, relationship to the ground and spatial device. We will harvest internal and external concepts from the precedents and in the process we will build representation skills. We will study and emphasize the intent and circumstances that produced each of the conditions and will diagram these through two­ and three­dimensional means. The concepts extracted will be interpreted, combined and applied to the design of a public building in the second half of the semester. Part 4 Having derived clear concepts from three precedent houses we will attempt to combine and recombine these in an attempt to use collage methodology as a generative tool. Trying to understand what it means to juxtapose one set of priorities with another, the spatial explorations in this part of the studio will be of an abstract nature and will be both synthetic and analytical. Thus through digital and physical models students will work in an iterative ways to study spatial conditions. Part 5 Introducing the program of the final design project, this part of the course will look at precedents that are specific to the program. Students will gain an understanding of the size and occupation of the assigned spaces as it relates to the chosen typology and will explore relationships between them. Part 6 Here we will begin the process of synthesis by bringing Parts 1­5 together and developing an architectural strategy that is linked to the early abstract spatial explorations but clearly responds to program and site. Part 7 We will continue to develop the project with a special emphasis on the experience and occupation, interrogating the design from the perspective of specific users and building empathy in the process. Part 8 In preparation for the final review, the final part of the studio will focus on synthesis and will offer an opportunity for reflection on the process undertaken and the products achieved. (...but first a scavenger hunt!) 3 2018 ARC201 Syllabus ARC 201: Design Studio 3: Process, Process, Process Fall 2018 PART 1 ­ Organization Project due at the beginning of class on Monday, September 10. The first three exercises of the semester use precedents to explore conceptual driving ideas in the design of buildings. By looking at three different houses, students will extract an idea about organization (Part 1), ground condition (Part 2) and architectural spatial devices (Part 3). The three ideas collected through these analysis exercises will be used in the design process later in the semester. It is therefore imperative that the analysis is insightful and the representation both careful and conceptually driven. In Part 1 we will focus on the organization of the precedent house to understand the logic and sequence of spaces as they relate to program (type of use), site, to experiential qualities or other specific conditions. Through analysis and re­presentation students will understand the organizational strategy and will speculate on its motivating factors. Students will produce two­ and three­ dimensional diagrams clearly communicating the ideas derived from research, close­reading and observation. READING Van Berkel, Ben, and Caroline Bos. “Diagrams: Interactive Instruments in Operation.” ANY: Architecture New York, no. 23, 1998, pp. 19–23. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/41856095. RESOURCES ON RESERVE The visual Display of Quantitative information and The Envisioning Information by Edward Tufte AD reader The diagrams of Architecture edited by Mark Garcia Precedents in Architecture: Analytical Diagrams, Formative Ideas, and Partis by Roger H. Clark and Michael Pause Diagram Diaries by Peter Eisenman DELIVERABLES ­ one 24x36 vertically oriented board (the layout of the panel will be discussed with your instructor): ­ chosen name/title for organization type based on the precedent ­ precedent plan and section (drawn at the same scale with scale and north indicated) ­ 1­2 diagrams pertaining to organization ­ information about the chosen precedent house (project name, architect name, location, year built) ­ several representative photos of the precedent ­ sources (list of books, journals, websites where you found information about the building) ­ one model representing the organizational principal of your chosen precedent house (you will need to make at least 2 working models in the process). The models should fit in an 6x6x6” cube. ­ A clear and concise verbal presentation (5 minutes) 1 2018 ARC201 Part 1 ARC 201: Design Studio 3: Process, Process, Process Fall 2018 LIST OF HOUSES Zumthor House Peter Zumthor Haldenstein, Switzerland 1998 Weekend House Ryue Nishizawa Usui­Gun, Gunna, Japan 1998 Casa de Vidro (Glass House) Lina Bo Bardi São Paulo, Brazil 1950 Maison à Bordeaux OMA Bordeaux, France 1998 Nine Square Grid House Shigeru Ban Architects Kanagawa, Japan 1997 Naked House Shigeru Ban Architects Saitama, Japan 2000 Weekend House Office KGDVS Merchtem, BE 2012 Villa Buggenhout Office KGDVS Buggenhout, BE 2012 Moriyama House SANAA Tokyo, Japan 2011 Solo House Pezo von Ellrichshausen Cretas, Spain 2013 Casa Parr Pezo von Ellrichshausen Chiguayante, Chile 2008 Cien House Pezo von Ellrichshausen Chile 2011 Nida House Pezo von Ellrichshausen Navidad, Chile 2015 Magney House Glenn Murcutt Bingie Point , Australia 1984 Muuratsalo Experimental House Alvar Aalto Muuratsalo, Finland 1953 House for Trees Vo Trong Nghia Architects Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 2014 Casa Bruma Fernanda Canales Mexico 2017 Coutras House Lacaton Vassal Coutras, France 2000 Dordogne France Lacaton Vassal Dordogne, France 1997 Casa Meri Pezo von Ellrichshausen Chile 2014 Mylla Hytte Mork­Ulnes Architects Mylla Lake, Norway 2018 Dutch House OMA The Netherlands 1995 Villa Savoye Le Corbusier Poissy, France 1929 Moonlight Cabin Jackson Clements Burrows Australia 2015 Tepoztlán Lounge Cadaval and Sola Morales Tepoztlán, Morelos, México 2016 Solo House II Office KGDVS Matarraña, Spain 2017 House Without Qualities OM Ungers Cologne, Germany 1995 Slow House DSR Long Island, USA 1990 Casa Habitacion Smiljan Radic Chile 1997 House in Djerba, Tunisia Machado and Silvetti Djerba, Tunisia 1976 Dune House Jarmund/Vignæs Arkitekter Thorpeness, England 2010 Double Chimney House Atelier Bow Wow Nagano, Japan 2008 Villa in the Forest Kazuyo Sejima Chino, Japan 1994 Esherick House Louis Kahn Philadelphia, United States 1961 2 2018 ARC201 Part 1 ARC 201: Design Studio 3: Process, Process, Process Fall 2018 PART 2 ­ Ground Project due at the beginning of class on Monday, September 17. In Part 2 we will focus on the ground condition of a precedent house to understand the way that the building sits on/in/over the site. Through analysis and re­presentation students will understand the sectional and planimetric strategy/relationship and will speculate on its motivating factors. Students will produce two­ and three­ dimensional diagrams clearly communicating the ideas derived from research, close­reading and observation. It is imperative that the analysis is
Recommended publications
  • Pritzker Architecture Prize Laureate

    Pritzker Architecture Prize Laureate

    For publication on or after Monday, March 29, 2010 Media Kit announcing the 2010 PritzKer architecture Prize Laureate This media kit consists of two booklets: one with text providing details of the laureate announcement, and a second booklet of photographs that are linked to downloadable high resolution images that may be used for printing in connection with the announcement of the Pritzker Architecture Prize. The photos of the Laureates and their works provided do not rep- resent a complete catalogue of their work, but rather a small sampling. Contents Previous Laureates of the Pritzker Prize ....................................................2 Media Release Announcing the 2010 Laureate ......................................3-5 Citation from Pritzker Jury ........................................................................6 Members of the Pritzker Jury ....................................................................7 About the Works of SANAA ...............................................................8-10 Fact Summary .....................................................................................11-17 About the Pritzker Medal ........................................................................18 2010 Ceremony Venue ......................................................................19-21 History of the Pritzker Prize ...............................................................22-24 Media contact The Hyatt Foundation phone: 310-273-8696 or Media Information Office 310-278-7372 Attn: Keith H. Walker fax: 310-273-6134 8802 Ashcroft Avenue e-mail: [email protected] Los Angeles, CA 90048-2402 http:/www.pritzkerprize.com 1 P r e v i o u s L a u r e a t e s 1979 1995 Philip Johnson of the United States of America Tadao Ando of Japan presented at Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C. presented at the Grand Trianon and the Palace of Versailles, France 1996 1980 Luis Barragán of Mexico Rafael Moneo of Spain presented at the construction site of The Getty Center, presented at Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C.
  • Arup in Japan

    Arup in Japan

    Arup in Japan A glimpse into Arup’s global expertise in Japan ©Hiroyuki Hirai ©Hiroyuki Contents 5 Our firm 14 Our Services 14 - Building design 22 - Technical consulting 26 - Advisory services 30 - Infrastructure 34 - Planning 36 Total design in the digital age 42 Social usefulness 43 Contact us On the cover Mt Fuji World Heritage Centre, Shizoka On this page (the tallest building): CITIC Tower, Beijing 2 3 ©Wentao 4 We shape a better world Arup is the creative force at the heart of many of the world’s most prominent projects in the built environment and across industry. We offer a broad range of professional This is reflected in everything we do, services that combine to make a allowing us to develop meaningful real difference to our clients and the ideas, help shape agendas and deliver communities in which we work. results that frequently surpass the expectations of our clients. We are truly global. From 88 offices in 33 countries, our 14,000 planners, The people at Arup are driven to find designers, engineers and consultants a better way and to deliver better deliver innovative projects across the solutions for our clients. world with creativity and passion. We shape a better world. Founded in 1946 with an enduring set of values, our unique trust ownership fosters a distinctive culture and an intellectual independence that encourages collaborative working. Image V&A Dundee, Dundee, UK ©HuftonCrow 5 6 Japan experience We bring together staff with diverse backgrounds and experiences to work with clients on projects in Japan and overseas. With a local office in Tokyo, Arup has The Tokyo office is also active been working in Japan for 30 years.
  • “HERE/AFTER: Structures in Time” Authors: Paul Clemence & Robert

    “HERE/AFTER: Structures in Time” Authors: Paul Clemence & Robert

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Book : “HERE/AFTER: Structures in Time” Authors: Paul Clemence & Robert Landon Featuring Projects by Zaha Hadid, Jean Nouvel, Frank Gehry, Oscar Niemeyer, Mies van der Rohe, and Many Others, All Photographed As Never Before. A Groundbreaking New book of Architectural Photographs and Original Essays Takes Readers on a Fascinating Journey Through Time In a visually striking new book Here/After: Structures in Time, award-winning photographer Paul Clemence and author Robert Landon take the reader on a remarkable tour of the hidden fourth dimension of architecture: Time. "Paul Clemence’s photography and Robert Landon’s essays remind us of the essential relationship between architecture, photography and time," writes celebrated architect, critic and former MoMA curator Terence Riley in the book's introduction. The 38 photographs in this book grow out of Clemence's restless search for new architectural encounters, which have taken him from Rio de Janeiro to New York, from Barcelona to Cologne. In the process he has created highly original images of some of the world's most celebrated buildings, from Frank Lloyd Wright's Guggenheim Museum to Frank Gehry's Guggenheim Bilbao. Other architects featured in the book include Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Oscar Niemeyer, Mies van der Rohe, Marcel Breuer, I.M. Pei, Studio Glavovic, Zaha Hadid and Jean Nouvel. However, Clemence's camera also discovers hidden beauty in unexpected places—an anonymous back alley, a construction site, even a graveyard. The buildings themselves may be still, but his images are dynamic and alive— dancing in time. Inspired by Clemence's photos, Landon's highly personal and poetic essays take the reader on a similar journey.
  • Phenomenology in Dwelling: Culture and Meaning of Place; a Proposal for a Mountainside Dwelling

    Phenomenology in Dwelling: Culture and Meaning of Place; a Proposal for a Mountainside Dwelling

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2008 Phenomenology in Dwelling: Culture and Meaning of Place; A Proposal for a Mountainside Dwelling James Robert Maveety University of Tennessee, Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Maveety, James Robert, "Phenomenology in Dwelling: Culture and Meaning of Place; A Proposal for a Mountainside Dwelling. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2008. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/3692 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by James Robert Maveety entitled "Phenomenology in Dwelling: Culture and Meaning of Place; A Proposal for a Mountainside Dwelling." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Architecture, with a major in Architecture. Hansjoerg Goeritz, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Barbara Klinkhammer, Scott Wall Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by James Robert Maveety entitled “Phenomenology in Dwelling: Culture and Meaning of Place; A Proposal for a Mountainside Dwelling.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture, with a major in Architecture.
  • Endless House: Intersections of Art and Architecture June 27, 2015–March 6, 2016 the Robert Menschel Architecture and Design Gallery, Third Floor

    Endless House: Intersections of Art and Architecture June 27, 2015–March 6, 2016 the Robert Menschel Architecture and Design Gallery, Third Floor

    Endless House: Intersections of Art and Architecture June 27, 2015–March 6, 2016 The Robert Menschel Architecture and Design Gallery, third floor Endless House considers the single-family home and archetypes of dwelling as a theme for the creative endeavors of architects and artists. Through drawings, photographs, video, installations, and architectural models drawn from MoMA’s collection, the exhibition highlights how artists have used the house as a means to explore universal topics, and how architects have tackled the design of residences to expand their discipline in new ways. The exhibition also marks the 50th anniversary of the death of Viennese-born artist and architect Frederick Kiesler (1890–1965). Taking its name from an unrealized project by Kiesler, Endless House celebrates his legacy and the cross-pollination of art and architecture that made Kiesler’s 15-year project a reference point for generations to come. Work by architects and artists spanning more than seven decades are exhibited alongside materials from Kiesler’s Endless House design and images of its presentation in MoMA’s 1960 Visionary Architecture exhibition. Intriguing house designs—ranging from historical projects by Mies van der Rohe, Frank Gehry, Peter Eisenman, and Rem Koolhaas, to new acquisitions from Smiljan Radic and Asymptote Architecture—are juxtaposed with visions from artists such as Louise Bourgeois, Bruce Nauman, Mario Merz, and Rachel Whiteread. Together these works demonstrate how the dwelling occupies a central place in a cultural exchange across generations and disciplines. Organized by Pedro Gadanho, Curator, Department of Architecture and Design, The Museum of Modern Art Architecture and Design Collection Exhibitions are made possible by Hyundai Card and Hyundai Capital America.
  • Shigeru Ban CEO Adam I

    Shigeru Ban CEO Adam I

    The Design Issue Volume 10.2 Shigeru Ban CEO Adam I. Sandow Publisher Michele Caniato Executive Director George M. Beylerian Springtime in New York isn’t just for blossoming flowers—it’s Editor-in-Chief also that special time of the year when the design community Gabriella Vivaldi emerges en masse from the winter weariness and flocks to the trades shows, showrooms, events and happenings across Contributing Editor the city. Incorporating new technologies, innovative materials Andrew H. Dent, Ph.D. and manufacturing experiences, an interesting array of novelty Jessica Kleiman projects and products make their debut this season, proving that the business of good design is booming, Jennifer Dixon Our annual Design Issue opens with "Where Architects Live," Art Director a special project developed by COSMIT for the 53rd edition Carlo Grioli of Salone del Mobile in Milan. This epic installation features a representation of residential living by design giants Shigeru Director of Publications Ban, Mario Bellini, David Chipperfield, Massimiliano and Michael LaGreca Doriana Fuksas, Zaha Hadid, Marcio Kogan, Daniel Libeskind and Studio Mumbai/Bijoy Jain. Director of Finance Also in this issue, Material ConneXion's sister company Matthew Kalishman Culture + Commerce recently announced two design collaborations for HOK Product Design, and in our interview Cover: with Susan Grossinger, we explore the background and Shigeru Ban © Hiroyuki Hiram inspiration behind HOK’s door collection with Lualdi, and tile lines with Lea Ceramiche. The issue closes with Michele Caniato’s interview with Apisit Laistrooglai, Managing Director of Material ConneXion Bangkok, who discusses his expansion plans and the material resources of Thailand.
  • Glenn Murcutt 2002 Laureate Biography

    Glenn Murcutt 2002 Laureate Biography

    Glenn Murcutt 2002 Laureate Biography Glenn Murcutt is either one of Australia’s best kept secrets, or one of the world’s most influential architects. Perhaps, both. On the other hand, we should temper “secret” somewhat since he has been the subject of numerous books and magazine articles throughout the world. One of the first definitive works was Glenn Murcutt Works and Projects by Françoise Fromonot, first published in 1995. In that book, she describes Murcutt as the “first Australian architect whose work has attracted international attention.” His relatively low profile can best be explained by the fact that he works alone, primarily for clients who want houses that are not only environmentally sensitive, but provide privacy and security in a structure that pleases all the senses. In stark contrast to many of his contemporaries, Murcutt has declared, “I am not interested in designing large scale projects. Doing many smaller works provides me with many more opportunities for experimentation. Our building regulations are supposed to prevent the worst; they in fact fail to stop the worst, and at best frustrate the best—they certainly sponsor mediocrity. I’m trying to produce what I call minimal buildings, but buildings that respond to their environment.” “I have had to fight for my architecture. I have fought for it right from the outset because councils have clearly found the work a threat. For many designs I put to council, we either had to resort to a court for the outcome or better, negotiate a satisfactory result, always trying to avoid a compromise. I have had the greatest trouble with planning, building and health department staff, many of whom have backgrounds unrelated to architecture, but offer very conservative judgments in taste and aesthetics.” What manner of man and architect is this who could so openly state his opposition to the people who exercise so much control over what and how things should be built? A look at his colorful family, as well as how and where he was raised is a partial explanation.
  • Jeffrey Beers International

    Jeffrey Beers International

    People Podcasts Episode 57: Jeffrey Beers February 2, 2021 Print Prolific designer and architect Jeffrey Beers, who recently celebrated his namesake firm’s 35th anniversary, grew up traveling the world with his parents, which instilled in him a love of hospitality and design—a skill he honed under a who’s who of mentors, including Dale Chihuly, Oscar Niemeyer, and I.M. Pei. Bar Lui, his claim to fame, had the distinction of being the longest bar in Manhattan when it was created. But Beers’ talents go beyond design. He is also known for glassblowing, what he describes as a creative counterpoint to the rigors of architecture. For the self-described rebel entrepreneur, his passion for the industry is as present today as it was more than three decades ago, cementing his legacy as one of the forefathers of hospitality design today. Subscribe to Hospitality Design’s What I’ve Learned podcast on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or listen here. Stacy Shoemaker Rauen: Hi, I’m here with JB:. Jeffrey, thanks so much for joining me today. Jeffrey Beers: Hi, Stacy. I’m thrilled to join you today. Thank you very much for inviting me. SSR: It’s so good to see you. Even if it’s over Zoom, it’s still very good to see you. JB: It’s great to see you, Stacy. Are you well? SSR: Good. JB: Boys are good? https://www.hospitalitydesign.com/people/podcasts/episode-57-jeffrey-beers/ SSR: Boys are good. Thank you. JB: Nice one. SSR: We always start at the beginning.
  • Pop-Up Landscape Architecture in Ho Chi Minh City: Cases of Creating Livable City for All

    Pop-Up Landscape Architecture in Ho Chi Minh City: Cases of Creating Livable City for All

    MATEC Web of Conferences 193, 04002 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819304002 ESCI 2018 Pop-up landscape architecture in Ho Chi Minh City: Cases of creating livable city for all Anh Viet Vu 1, Thi Ai Thuy Pham 1, and Tu Pham 1,* 1University of Architecture Ho Chi Minh City, 196 Pasteurstr., Ward 6, District 3, Hochiminh City Abstract. The pop-up architecture (or landscape architecture) becomes popular nowadays. Some highlights include annual architecture program such as the Serpentine Gallery Pavilion at Hyde Park, London; MPavilion in Melbourne; MoMA PS1 and Heart Sculpture in New York. Many of these pop-up architectural works have been designed by world renowned architects, such as Zaha Hadid, Rem Koolhaas, Hezorg and de Meuron, Jean Nouvel, Toyo Ito, SANAA, Shigeru Ban, BIG, etc. And many of these designs reflect innovative thinking that changes the professional world of architectural design. But above all, these pop-up architectures were created in responsive manner to the urban community and the community controversially has good response to this type of architecture. In the other words, pop-up architecture is the way the architects touch the heartbeat of the cities, make them livable for all. Ho Chi Minh City has its own types of pop-up landscape architecture, whereas this paper intends to explore in two case studies: Nguyen Hue Floral Boulevard and Nguyen Van Binh Book Street. Nguyen Hue Floral Street is celebrating now its twelfth birthday in the city. Nguyen Van Binh Book Street has just passed its first anniversary in 2017. Both cases live its own story behind the scene about how livable a city could be through place-making by architecture and landscape design.
  • Nowe Miasto Pod Ziemią New Underground City

    Nowe Miasto Pod Ziemią New Underground City

    EWA WĘCŁAWOWICZ-GYURKOVICH∗ NOWE MIASTO POD ZIEMIĄ NEW UNDERGROUND CITY Streszczenie Obserwowana na przełomie wieków fascynacja formami organicznymi, zakrzywionymi bądź pofałdowanymi zmusza do sięgania do świata przyrody, by odkrywać ją niejako na nowo. Szeroki kontekst środowiska, pejzaż, większe fragmenty natury nie zaskakują w analizie projektowej. Nie przypadkiem znowu powracamy do obecnej w awangardzie od lat 70. Sztuki Ziemi. Różnorodność bazująca na topografii terenu staje się podstawową wytyczną wszelkich działań. Słowa kluczowe: miasto, architektura współczesna Abstract Fascination with organic, bent, or undulating forms, observable at the turn of centuries, calls for reference to the world of nature to discover it once again. Broad context of the environment, landscape, bigger fragments of nature do not surprise in design analysis. It is not accidental that we return to the Art of Earth, present in avant-garde since the 70s. Variety basing on topography of the site becomes the guideline of all activity. Keywords: city, contemporary architecture ∗ Dr inż. arch. Ewa Węcławowicz-Gyurkovich, Instytut Historii Architektury i Konserwacji Zabytków, Wydział Architektury, Politechnika Krakowska. 196 (...) z miastami jest jak ze snami: wszystko co wyobrażalne może się przyśnić, ale nawet najbardziej zaskakujący sen jest rebusem, który kryje w sobie pragnienie lub jego odwrotną stronę – lęk. Miasta jak sny są zbudowane z pragnień i lęków, nawet jeśli wątek ich mowy jest utajony, zasady – absurdalne, perspektywy – złudne, a każda rzecz kryje w sobie inną (...) Italo Calvino, Niewidzialne miasta1 Nowe Centrum Kulturalne prowincji Galicja w zachodnio-północnej Hiszpanii zajmuje całe wzgó- rze na zachodnim pogórzu Gór Kantabryjskich, na przedmieściach miasta Santiago de Compostela. Region Galicji od X w. p.n.e.
  • “Shall We Compete?”

    “Shall We Compete?”

    5th International Conference on Competitions 2014 Delft “Shall We Compete?” Pedro Guilherme 35 5th International Conference on Competitions 2014 Delft “Shall we compete?” Author Pedro Miguel Hernandez Salvador Guilherme1 CHAIA (Centre for Art History and Artistic Research), Universidade de Évora, Portugal http://uevora.academia.edu/PedroGuilherme (+351) 962556435 [email protected] Abstract Following previous research on competitions from Portuguese architects abroad we propose to show a risomatic string of politic, economic and sociologic events that show why competitions are so much appealing. We will follow Álvaro Siza Vieira and Eduardo Souto de Moura as the former opens the first doors to competitions and the latter follows the master with renewed strength and research vigour. The European convergence provides the opportunity to develop and confirm other architects whose competences and aesthetics are internationally known and recognized. Competitions become an opportunity to other work, different scales and strategies. By 2000, the downfall of the golden initial European years makes competitions not only an opportunity but the only opportunity for young architects. From the early tentative, explorative years of Siza’s firs competitions to the current massive participation of Portuguese architects in foreign competitions there is a long, cumulative effort of competence and visibility that gives international competitions a symbolic, unquestioned value. Keywords International Architectural Competitions, Portugal, Souto de Moura, Siza Vieira, research, decision making Introduction Architects have for long been competing among themselves in competitions. They have done so because they believed competitions are worth it, despite all its negative aspects. There are immense resources allocated in competitions: human labour, time, competences, stamina, expertizes, costs, energy and materials.
  • Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation

    Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation

    COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING AND PRESERVATION Spring 2019 ARCHA4349 Modernization and the Modern Project Instructor: Kenneth Frampton Teaching Fellows: Alireza Karbasioun (ak3936), Ife Salema Vanable (isv2104) Teaching Assistant: Taylor Zhai Williams (tzw2111) Class Meeting: Wednesday 11:00am-1:00pm, AVH Ware Lounge Building and architecture are cosmogonic arts; that is to say, they involve the creation of artificial worlds to stand against the chaos of nature and the erosive forces of time. In that sense, architecture is a material culture close to the necessities of food production and the practice of medicine. Irrespective of whether we have in mind the idiosyncrasies of vernacular architecture or the embodiment of power, building culture like all culture entails a mediation between innovation and tradition. At the same time, modernization as an ever-accelerating instrumental process continues relentlessly to such an extent that we are on the verge of losing our former capacity to assimilate in cultural terms the volatility of constantly changing conditions. Modern architecture since its inception has been continuously challenged to find modes of spatial, structural and material organization capable of responding adequately to new and often unprecedented circumstances. This lecture course has been devised in order to convey to young architects the way in which the Modern Movement may be perceived retrospectively as a series of wave-like formations which come into being, rise to their maturity and then fall away as they are overtaken by new impulses responding to totally different conditions. As the following brief history of the Modern Movement attempts to demonstrate, one may look at the past as a sequence of discernable impulses that each have had their own life span.