Arc De La Villette Competition Entry, 1982, Original Image Cropped
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
OMA, Parc de la Villette competition entry, 1982, original image cropped, http://oma.eu/projects/parcdelavillette ARC 201: Design Studio 3: Process, Process, Process SYLLABUS FALL 2018 CREDITS 6 CLASS HOURS MWF 1:00 pm – 4:20 pm 1 2018 ARC201 Syllabus INSTRUCTORS Mustafa Faruki mustafa@thelablab.com Crosby 120 Julia Jamrozik (coordinator) [email protected] Crosby 101 Virginia Melnyk [email protected] Crosby 110 Nellie Niespodzinski [email protected] Crosby 160 Sasson Rafailov [email protected] Crosby 130 Jon Spielman [email protected] Crosby 150 ELIGIBILITY ARC102: Architectural Design Studio. Architecture majors only. PREREQUISITES/COREQUISITES ARC311: Architectural Media 3 required. ARC 241: Environmental Systems – recommended. These courses will be linked in content and schedule. COURSE DESCRIPTION How do we design? What drives ideas and what generates concepts? How do we productively and critically engage with the vast history and contemporary practice of architecture in the process? How do we design places that are rooted in their location but reflective of the past and aspiring to a better future? How do we meld idealism with practicality? This studio will not offer answers to all of these questions but it will introduce one methodology and prompt a selfconscious and introspective approach to the design process. The studio is guided by ideas of morphology and context. Morphology is understood as formfinding or the deliberate, logical and wellargumented development of a formal strategy. Context is understood as the relation to site at different scales and through different lenses (physical, social, cultural) and includes the history of the discipline of architecture. These themes will be explored primarily through the study of precedents, through the process of abstraction, through interpretation and finally through iterative application onto an assigned site and program. Through this approach the class will offer students a link between analytical, experiential and strategic forms of design. The studio is divided into several parts, all of which are linked and relevant to oneanother. The process matters as much as the final product of the studio. 2 2018 ARC201 Syllabus Emphasizing the value of curiosity , risktaking and independent critical thinking , the concepts developed in the studio will be augmented through an emphasis on skillbuilding and experimentation. Part 13 In the first weeks of the semester we will be looking at examples of built houses with three different objectives/lenses of focus: those of organization, relationship to the ground and spatial device. We will harvest internal and external concepts from the precedents and in the process we will build representation skills. We will study and emphasize the intent and circumstances that produced each of the conditions and will diagram these through two and threedimensional means. The concepts extracted will be interpreted, combined and applied to the design of a public building in the second half of the semester. Part 4 Having derived clear concepts from three precedent houses we will attempt to combine and recombine these in an attempt to use collage methodology as a generative tool. Trying to understand what it means to juxtapose one set of priorities with another, the spatial explorations in this part of the studio will be of an abstract nature and will be both synthetic and analytical. Thus through digital and physical models students will work in an iterative ways to study spatial conditions. Part 5 Introducing the program of the final design project, this part of the course will look at precedents that are specific to the program. Students will gain an understanding of the size and occupation of the assigned spaces as it relates to the chosen typology and will explore relationships between them. Part 6 Here we will begin the process of synthesis by bringing Parts 15 together and developing an architectural strategy that is linked to the early abstract spatial explorations but clearly responds to program and site. Part 7 We will continue to develop the project with a special emphasis on the experience and occupation, interrogating the design from the perspective of specific users and building empathy in the process. Part 8 In preparation for the final review, the final part of the studio will focus on synthesis and will offer an opportunity for reflection on the process undertaken and the products achieved. (...but first a scavenger hunt!) 3 2018 ARC201 Syllabus ARC 201: Design Studio 3: Process, Process, Process Fall 2018 PART 1 Organization Project due at the beginning of class on Monday, September 10. The first three exercises of the semester use precedents to explore conceptual driving ideas in the design of buildings. By looking at three different houses, students will extract an idea about organization (Part 1), ground condition (Part 2) and architectural spatial devices (Part 3). The three ideas collected through these analysis exercises will be used in the design process later in the semester. It is therefore imperative that the analysis is insightful and the representation both careful and conceptually driven. In Part 1 we will focus on the organization of the precedent house to understand the logic and sequence of spaces as they relate to program (type of use), site, to experiential qualities or other specific conditions. Through analysis and representation students will understand the organizational strategy and will speculate on its motivating factors. Students will produce two and three dimensional diagrams clearly communicating the ideas derived from research, closereading and observation. READING Van Berkel, Ben, and Caroline Bos. “Diagrams: Interactive Instruments in Operation.” ANY: Architecture New York, no. 23, 1998, pp. 19–23. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/41856095. RESOURCES ON RESERVE The visual Display of Quantitative information and The Envisioning Information by Edward Tufte AD reader The diagrams of Architecture edited by Mark Garcia Precedents in Architecture: Analytical Diagrams, Formative Ideas, and Partis by Roger H. Clark and Michael Pause Diagram Diaries by Peter Eisenman DELIVERABLES one 24x36 vertically oriented board (the layout of the panel will be discussed with your instructor): chosen name/title for organization type based on the precedent precedent plan and section (drawn at the same scale with scale and north indicated) 12 diagrams pertaining to organization information about the chosen precedent house (project name, architect name, location, year built) several representative photos of the precedent sources (list of books, journals, websites where you found information about the building) one model representing the organizational principal of your chosen precedent house (you will need to make at least 2 working models in the process). The models should fit in an 6x6x6” cube. A clear and concise verbal presentation (5 minutes) 1 2018 ARC201 Part 1 ARC 201: Design Studio 3: Process, Process, Process Fall 2018 LIST OF HOUSES Zumthor House Peter Zumthor Haldenstein, Switzerland 1998 Weekend House Ryue Nishizawa UsuiGun, Gunna, Japan 1998 Casa de Vidro (Glass House) Lina Bo Bardi São Paulo, Brazil 1950 Maison à Bordeaux OMA Bordeaux, France 1998 Nine Square Grid House Shigeru Ban Architects Kanagawa, Japan 1997 Naked House Shigeru Ban Architects Saitama, Japan 2000 Weekend House Office KGDVS Merchtem, BE 2012 Villa Buggenhout Office KGDVS Buggenhout, BE 2012 Moriyama House SANAA Tokyo, Japan 2011 Solo House Pezo von Ellrichshausen Cretas, Spain 2013 Casa Parr Pezo von Ellrichshausen Chiguayante, Chile 2008 Cien House Pezo von Ellrichshausen Chile 2011 Nida House Pezo von Ellrichshausen Navidad, Chile 2015 Magney House Glenn Murcutt Bingie Point , Australia 1984 Muuratsalo Experimental House Alvar Aalto Muuratsalo, Finland 1953 House for Trees Vo Trong Nghia Architects Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 2014 Casa Bruma Fernanda Canales Mexico 2017 Coutras House Lacaton Vassal Coutras, France 2000 Dordogne France Lacaton Vassal Dordogne, France 1997 Casa Meri Pezo von Ellrichshausen Chile 2014 Mylla Hytte MorkUlnes Architects Mylla Lake, Norway 2018 Dutch House OMA The Netherlands 1995 Villa Savoye Le Corbusier Poissy, France 1929 Moonlight Cabin Jackson Clements Burrows Australia 2015 Tepoztlán Lounge Cadaval and Sola Morales Tepoztlán, Morelos, México 2016 Solo House II Office KGDVS Matarraña, Spain 2017 House Without Qualities OM Ungers Cologne, Germany 1995 Slow House DSR Long Island, USA 1990 Casa Habitacion Smiljan Radic Chile 1997 House in Djerba, Tunisia Machado and Silvetti Djerba, Tunisia 1976 Dune House Jarmund/Vignæs Arkitekter Thorpeness, England 2010 Double Chimney House Atelier Bow Wow Nagano, Japan 2008 Villa in the Forest Kazuyo Sejima Chino, Japan 1994 Esherick House Louis Kahn Philadelphia, United States 1961 2 2018 ARC201 Part 1 ARC 201: Design Studio 3: Process, Process, Process Fall 2018 PART 2 Ground Project due at the beginning of class on Monday, September 17. In Part 2 we will focus on the ground condition of a precedent house to understand the way that the building sits on/in/over the site. Through analysis and representation students will understand the sectional and planimetric strategy/relationship and will speculate on its motivating factors. Students will produce two and three dimensional diagrams clearly communicating the ideas derived from research, closereading and observation. It is imperative that the analysis is