DOCSLIB.ORG

Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Murdoch's World the Last of the Old Media Empires by David Folkenflik Review: Murdoch’S World – the Last of the Old Media Empires

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Murdoch's World the Last of the Old Media Empires by David Folkenflik Review: Murdoch’S World – the Last of the Old Media Empires Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Murdoch's World The Last of the Old Media Empires by David Folkenflik Review: Murdoch’s World – the last of the old media empires. David McKnight has previously written a book on Rupert Murdoch, "Rupert Murdoch: An Investigation of Power". Partners. UNSW provides funding as a member of The Conversation AU. The Conversation UK receives funding from these organisations. Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn WhatsApp Messenger. The eruption of the News International phone hacking scandal has caused significant problems for Rupert Murdoch and his business empire. It forced him to close his big money spinner, News of the World, and to withdraw his takeover bid for the enormously profitable BSkyB satellite TV broadcaster. All of this has spawned a veritable tsunami of Murdoch books, including David Folkenflik’s Murdoch’s World. It’s a well written account of some of the most dramatic events surrounding Murdoch’s career and impact. Folkenflik argues the hacking scandal reflects a corporate culture at News, a culture in which there is a contempt for rules which govern the rest of us. In Britain this took the form of no-holds-barred journalism in which cops were bribed and the law systematically broken. In Australia this culture of contempt for rules translates into a disregard for any balance when reporting certain issues or in targeting Murdoch’s enemies du jour . All of this is a reflection of the group think which Murdoch sponsors among his editors and executives that they are rebels and enemies of the “establishment”. As Folkenflik says, this is a corporation which “has accumulated more influence than any other media company in the world and yet remains convinced of its status as an outsider”. But there are some odd absences. Murdoch’s obsessive support for the invasion of Iraq saw him mobilise his battalions of television and print outlets in support of George W. Bush. It is a text book example of the kind of power Murdoch can summon, yet this is barely mentioned. Nor does he mention Murdoch’s role as a long time funder of right-wing causes and think tanks. Folkenflik does better in highlighting that other major issue of our time – climate change. In the US and Australia, Murdoch’s media is the main public sources of climate scepticism. And except for a small window in which he veered off course, Murdoch himself has been happy with this. Another strength is the book’s account of the meaning of Murdoch’s takeover of the Wall Street Journal. This includes the struggle within the newspaper over whether to publish critical stories about phone hacking. A London-based WSJ reporter had uncovered new evidence that News of the World had openly referred to hacking in a story but this was dropped in later editions of the paper, presumably on orders of one of its chiefs. This raised the obvious question about the prior knowledge of the paper’s chiefs of the criminal act. Folkenflik reports that WSJ editor Robert Thomson “tried to kill the story several different times”. Eventually, however, it was published. Folkenflik also convinced the past editor of the New York Post, Ken Chandler, to open up about the New York Post’s reporting on issues of race and homophobia. Much speculation has focused on the succession. Who will run the global media giant after Rupert? When Murdoch himself is asked this, he points out mischievously that his mother lived to 103. Rupert Murdoch plans to be around for a while, reminding reporters his mother lived until 103. Public Affairs. He plans to be around for a lot longer and there is no reason to think he is not healthy and fit. But the succession also raises issues about the beneficiaries who will ultimately inherit shares and run the company – the children by Anna and Rupert Murdoch. This is a group of people who have quite different outlooks on the world. Elisabeth is the most independent minded and politically progressive. She supported Obama and is critical of the politics of Fox News. She didn’t endear herself to other members of the family by saying that James Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks had “fucked the company”. For his part, James Murdoch also takes his distance from his father but in a more measured way. He is an American-style centrist liberal who, for example, understands very well the dangers of climate change. Lachlan Murdoch is a man in his father’s image. He is on the right – under his leadership the New York Post hysterically beat the war drum in favour of the Iraq invasion. The division of the company into two parts (one mainly newspapers and books and the other TV and movies) may make it easier for them to divvy up the inheritance. But Rupert will be around for quite some time to come, I think. Murdoch’s World: The Last of the Old Media Empires by David Folkenflik is published by Public Affairs and available in Australia through NewSouth Books. Cookie Consent and Choices. NPR’s sites use cookies, similar tracking and storage technologies, and information about the device you use to access our sites (together, “cookies”) to enhance your viewing, listening and user experience, personalize content, personalize messages from NPR’s sponsors, provide social media features, and analyze NPR’s traffic. This information is shared with social media, sponsorship, analytics, and other vendors or service providers. See details. You may click on “ Your Choices ” below to learn about and use cookie management tools to limit use of cookies when you visit NPR’s sites. You can adjust your cookie choices in those tools at any time. If you click “ Agree and Continue ” below, you acknowledge that your cookie choices in those tools will be respected and that you otherwise agree to the use of cookies on NPR’s sites. Murdoch's World. How afraid are Aussie politicians of the Murdoch press? → From the Guardian’s account of top aide’s memoir. Harry Evans testifies before House of Lords on Murdoch and media concentration → Former Times of London editor under Murdoch fears further consolidation in UK. New book: 'Wall Street Journal' reporters stymied on News Corp. phone-hack scandal | Capital New York → Capital New York’s first look at my chapters at the tumult inside the Wall Street Journal at the height of the hacking scandal. "It was an amazing document, a mixture of error, fact, exaggeration, prejudice, and the most sentimental patriotism, which made highly damaging charges against the British general staff…many of them untrue. But the basis of the charges – that the Gallipoli expedition was in danger of disaster – was correct." — – the Australian writer Phillip Knightley, on Keith Murdoch’s role in revealing the botched British invasion in World War 1, which took a heavy toll on Australian and New Zealand forces. The Independent reports Rupert Murdoch spoke about his father’s effort to reveal the extent of the debacle during an hour-long interview with the BBC, a competitor that he routinely trashes in Twitter and elsewhere. Rupert Murdoch survives challenge over control of 21st Century Fox → The LA Times’s Meg James reports from the annual shareholder meetings for the new 21st Century Fox that an investor effort to shunt him aside as chairman failed once more. This move to win an independent chairman was led by Tim Shaler of Christian Bros. Investment Services, who oversees $4.6B in investments on behalf of Catholic institutions. Two years ago, Rupert had a curt riposte to a critical query from an investor who acted on behalf of the Church of England: “Your investments haven’t been that great.” “A disproportionate focus on historic matters” Such was the phrase used to dismiss the concerns of a shareholder advisory group, ISS, over the presence of the Murdochs (and their associates) on the 21st Century Fox board by corporate spokesman Nathaniel Brown. Given that the Murdochs and their largest outside investor and close ally, Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, control about 47 percent of all voting shares, the call holds little peril for the family. Brown’s dismissal alluded to the ISS concerns over the reaction of 21C’s predecessor company, the old News Corp, to the hacking scandal in the UK. Historic or not, the scandal cost News Corp (and 21C) hundreds of millions of dollars since the summer of 2011, with the tab still running; several former UK top executives and prominent journalists for the company are about to go on trial later this month. When is the last time Fox News fell for an equally damaging fake story that cut against the GOP or conservatives? Fox News’ Fox&Friends host Anna Kooiman reported that President Obama would pay out of pocket to keep open a “Museum of Muslim Culture” amid the government shutdown. The liberal group Media Matters tracked down the source: a fake story from the satiric “National Report.” Note the photo of the “International Museum of Muslim Cultures” in Jackson, Miss - pretty clearly the Milwaukee Art Museum. It is hard to recall when a similar mistake on Fox wrongly cast a figure on the political right in an equally embarrassing light. Obviously, journalists prove capable of fallibility on a daily basis. But Fox once again comes off, at best, as awfully credulous of anything that will make Obama & the Dems look bad. George Will takes his Post on Fox News. I tuned in Friday evening to Bret Baier’s panel of pundits in the second half of the 6 pm hour to see longtime ABC NEWS pundit George Will make his Fox debut and it hit me: With Will, Charles Lane, and Charles Krauthammer on board, three of the four commentators are pundits for the Washington Post .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The News Media Industry Defined
    Spring 2006 Industry Study Final Report News Media Industry The Industrial College of the Armed Forces National Defense University Fort McNair, Washington, D.C. 20319-5062 i NEWS MEDIA 2006 ABSTRACT: The American news media industry is characterized by two competing dynamics – traditional journalistic values and market demands for profit. Most within the industry consider themselves to be journalists first. In that capacity, they fulfill two key roles: providing information that helps the public act as informed citizens, and serving as a watchdog that provides an important check on the power of the American government. At the same time, the news media is an extremely costly, market-driven, and profit-oriented industry. These sometimes conflicting interests compel the industry to weigh the public interest against what will sell. Moreover, several fast-paced trends have emerged within the industry in recent years, driven largely by changes in technology, demographics, and industry economics. They include: consolidation of news organizations, government deregulation, the emergence of new types of media, blurring of the distinction between news and entertainment, decline in international coverage, declining circulation and viewership for some of the oldest media institutions, and increased skepticism of the credibility of “mainstream media.” Looking ahead, technology will enable consumers to tailor their news and access it at their convenience – perhaps at the cost of reading the dull but important stories that make an informed citizenry. Changes in viewer preferences – combined with financial pressures and fast paced technological changes– are forcing the mainstream media to re-look their long-held business strategies. These changes will continue to impact the media’s approach to the news and the profitability of the news industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the News: Texas
    THE STATE OF THE NEWS: TEXAS GOOGLE’S NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE JOURNALISM INDUSTRY #SaveJournalism #SaveJournalism EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Antitrust investigators are finally focusing on the anticompetitive practices of Google. Both the Department of Justice and a coalition of attorneys general from 48 states and the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico now have the tech behemoth squarely in their sights. Yet, while Google’s dominance of the digital advertising marketplace is certainly on the agenda of investigators, it is not clear that the needs of one of the primary victims of that dominance—the journalism industry—are being considered. That must change and change quickly because Google is destroying the business model of the journalism industry. As Google has come to dominate the digital advertising marketplace, it has siphoned off advertising revenue that used to go to news publishers. The numbers are staggering. News publishers’ advertising revenue is down by nearly 50 percent over $120B the last seven years, to $14.3 billion, $100B while Google’s has nearly tripled $80B to $116.3 billion. If ad revenue for $60B news publishers declines in the $40B next seven years at the same rate $20B as the last seven, there will be $0B practically no ad revenue left and the journalism industry will likely 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 disappear along with it. The revenue crisis has forced more than 1,700 newspapers to close or merge, the end of daily news coverage in 2,000 counties across the country, and the loss of nearly 40,000 jobs in America’s newsrooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract a Case Study of Cross-Ownership Waivers
    ABSTRACT A CASE STUDY OF CROSS-OWNERSHIP WAIVERS: FRAMING NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF RUPERT MURDOCH’S REQUESTS TO KEEP THE NEW YORK POST by Rachel L. Seeman Media ownership is an important regulatory issue that is enforced by the Federal Communications Commission. The FCC, Congress, court and public interest groups share varying viewpoints concerning what the ownership limits should be and whether companies should be granted a waiver to be excused from the rules. News Corporation is one media firm that has a history of seeking these waivers, particularly for the New York Post and television stations in same community. This study conducted a qualitative framing analysis of news articles from the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal to determine if the viewpoints expressed by the editorial boards were reflected in reports on News Corp.’s attempt to receive cross-ownership waivers. The analysis uncovered ten frames the newspapers used to assist in reporting the events and found that 80% of these frames did parallel the positions the paper’s editorial boards took concerning ownership waivers. A CASE STUDY OF CROSS-OWNERSHIP WAIVERS: FRAMING NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF RUPERT MURDOCH’S REQUESTS TO KEEP THE NEW YORK POST A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Communications by Rachel Leianne Seeman Miami University Oxford, OH 2009 Advisor: __________________________________ (Dr. Bruce Drushel) Reader: __________________________________ (Dr. Howard
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of Gene Kimmelman, Senior Director for Advocacy and Public Policy, Consumers Union
    Testimony of Gene Kimmelman, Senior Director for Advocacy and Public Policy, Consumers Union Before the Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights Subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee On News Corp./DirecTV Merger June 18, 2003 Washington Office 1666 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Suite 310 • Washington, D.C. 20009-1039 (202) 462-6262 • fax (202) 265-9548 • http://www.consumersunion.org SUMMARY Consumers Union1 welcomes this opportunity to testify before the Senate Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights Subcommittee regarding the proposed merger between the News Corporation (“News Corp.”) and Hughes Electronics Corporation’s satellite television unit DIRECTV (“DirecTV”). Given the current concentration in the media marketplace, as well as the further concentration that will result from the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC’s) recent relaxation of media ownership rules, we believe that the proposed merger between network and cable giant News Corp. and DirecTV, the largest direct broadcast satellite (DBS) service provider, will further increase prices for consumers and decrease the diversity of voices in the media marketplace. Today, consumers are not receiving the fruits that a competitive cable and satellite marketplace should deliver, and consumers are likely to suffer further harm if antitrust officials do not impose substantial conditions on the proposed deal between News Corp. and DirecTV. Since passage of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, cable rates have risen over 50%,2 and FCC data show that satellite competition is not creating downward pressure on cable rates. Despite the promise for more diversity from new technologies such as the Internet and satellite, a mere five media companies control nearly the same prime time audience shares as the Big Three networks did 40 years ago.3 Unfortunately, the market for news production and distribution is becoming more concentrated.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MEDIA REALITY CHECK: a Content Analysis of Recent News Coverage of Long-Term Care Ins Urance
    THE MEDIA REALITY CHECK: A Content Analysis of Recent News Coverage of Long-Term Care Insu rance Presented by: David Michaelson, Ph.D. OBJECTIVE } Evaluate coverage of long-term care insurance in major consumer media by determining: ¾ Overall accuracy of coverage ¾ Misstatements ¾ Incomplete information ¾ IliInclusion of fbift basic facts ¾ Omission of basic facts 2 METHODOLOGY } Content analysis of articles on long-term care insurance appearing in major media from January 1, 2002 through June 30, 2004 } Analysis based on codes organized around three areas: ¾ Basic facts about long-term care insurance ¾ Misstatements about long-term care insurance ¾ Omissions of basic facts about long-term care insurance 3 METHODOLOGY } Codes cover seven basic categories ¾ Definition of Long-Term Care ¾ Definition of Long-term Care Insurance ¾ Qualifications for Long-Term Care Insurance ¾ Benefits of Long-Term Care Insurance ¾ Purchase Considerations ¾ Product Features ¾ Costs of Long-Term Care Insurance } Codes developpgyed in consultation with leading industry experts, including experts at MetLife } Codes refined upon of review of articles } CdiCoding done in “con tex t”ft” of eac h ar tilticle to ensure balanced and fair evaluation of content 4 METHODOLOGY } Articles identified through “key word” search of Factiva database ¾ Boolean search string using “‘long term care AND insurance’ OR ‘assisted living AND insurance’ OR ‘nursing home AND insurance’” was basis of search ¾ 295 articles met initial search criteria ¾ Search supplemented with review of
    [Show full text]
  • The Donald Trump-Rupert Murdoch Relationship in the United States
    The Donald Trump-Rupert Murdoch relationship in the United States When Donald Trump ran as a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, Rupert Murdoch was reported to be initially opposed to him, so the Wall Street Journal and the New York Post were too.1 However, Roger Ailes and Murdoch fell out because Ailes wanted to give more positive coverage to Trump on Fox News.2 Soon afterwards, however, Fox News turned more negative towards Trump.3 As Trump emerged as the inevitable winner of the race for the nomination, Murdoch’s attitude towards Trump appeared to shift, as did his US news outlets.4 Once Trump became the nominee, he and Rupert Murdoch effectively concluded an alliance of mutual benefit: Murdoch’s news outlets would help get Trump elected, and then Trump would use his powers as president in ways that supported Rupert Murdoch’s interests. An early signal of this coming together was Trump’s public attacks on the AT&T-Time Warner merger, 21st Century Fox having tried but failed to acquire Time Warner previously in 2014. Over the last year and a half, Fox News has been the major TV news supporter of Donald Trump. Its coverage has displayed extreme bias in his favour, offering fawning coverage of his actions and downplaying or rubbishing news stories damaging to him, while also leading attacks against Donald Trump’s opponent in the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton. Ofcom itself ruled that several Sean Hannity programmes in August 2016 were so biased in favour of Donald Trump and against Hillary Clinton that they breached UK impartiality rules.5 During this period, Rupert Murdoch has been CEO of Fox News, in which position he is also 1 See e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy
    Mount Rushmore: The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy Brian Asher Rosenwald Wynnewood, PA Master of Arts, University of Virginia, 2009 Bachelor of Arts, University of Pennsylvania, 2006 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August, 2015 !1 © Copyright 2015 by Brian Asher Rosenwald All Rights Reserved August 2015 !2 Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to the many people without whom this project would not have been possible. First, a huge thank you to the more than two hundred and twenty five people from the radio and political worlds who graciously took time from their busy schedules to answer my questions. Some of them put up with repeated follow ups and nagging emails as I tried to develop an understanding of the business and its political implications. They allowed me to keep most things on the record, and provided me with an understanding that simply would not have been possible without their participation. When I began this project, I never imagined that I would interview anywhere near this many people, but now, almost five years later, I cannot imagine the project without the information gleaned from these invaluable interviews. I have been fortunate enough to receive fellowships from the Fox Leadership Program at the University of Pennsylvania and the Corcoran Department of History at the University of Virginia, which made it far easier to complete this dissertation. I am grateful to be a part of the Fox family, both because of the great work that the program does, but also because of the terrific people who work at Fox.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcast Media Sourcing: a Case Study of the 2010 Health Care Debate Beth Walker Frady
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2011 Broadcast Media Sourcing: A Case Study of the 2010 Health Care Debate Beth Walker Frady Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION BROADCAST MEDIA SOURCING: A CASE STUDY OF THE 2010 HEALTH CARE DEBATE By BETH WALKER FRADY A Thesis submitted to the College of Communication in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2011 Beth Frady defended this thesis on August 3, 2011. The members of the supervisory committee were: Jennifer Proffitt Professor Directing Thesis Davis Houck Committee Member Jeanette Castillo Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the thesis has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For David and Vince who continuously inspire me to never give up. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express sincere appreciation to Dr. Jennifer Proffitt, who served not only as a dedicated committee chair but also as a friend and mentor throughout my graduate career at Florida State University. Without her support, both personally and academically, this work would not have been possible. Additionally, I would like to extend my gratitude to my other committee members who also shaped me into the scholar I am today: Dr. Davis Houck, who taught me to believe in myself and always pushed me never to settle; and Dr. Jeanette Castillo, whose passion and care kept me energized throughout this project.
    [Show full text]
  • How Noninstitutionalized Media Change the Relationship Between the Public and Media Coverage of Trials
    06__WHEELER__CONTRACT PROOF.DOC 11/18/2008 11:41:41 AM HOW NONINSTITUTIONALIZED MEDIA CHANGE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PUBLIC AND MEDIA COVERAGE OF TRIALS MARCY WHEELER* I INTRODUCTION Justice Brennan’s concurring opinion in Nebraska Press Ass’n v. Stuart1 puts citizenship and the public at the heart of the purpose of media coverage of legal proceedings: Commentary and reporting on the criminal justice system is at the core of the First Amendment values, for the operation and integrity of that system is of crucial import to citizens concerned with the administration of government. Secrecy of judicial action can only breed ignorance and distrust of courts and suspicion concerning the competence and impartiality of judges; free and robust reporting, criticism, and debate can contribute to public understanding of the rule of law and to comprehension of the functioning of the entire criminal justice system, as well as improve the quality of that system by subjecting it to the cleansing effects of exposure and public accountability.2 That is, media coverage of legal proceedings should further the public understanding of those proceedings and of the legal system generally and should foster oversight over its functioning. Unfortunately, much coverage of legal proceedings now serves to increase ratings rather than to increase the public’s understanding of the justice system.3 Moreover, examples like early coverage of the Duke lacrosse case show that the press can exacerbate—rather than expose—abuses of the judicial system and the legal system generally. Since the advent of the Internet, however, additional media outlets—like blogs and wikis—have begun to change the relationship between media Copyright © 2008 by Marcy Wheeler.
    [Show full text]
  • Embedded Reporters: What Are Americans Getting?
    Embedded Reporters: What Are Americans Getting? For More Information Contact: Tom Rosenstiel, Director, Project for Excellence in Journalism Amy Mitchell, Associate Director Matt Carlson, Wally Dean, Dante Chinni, Atiba Pertilla, Research Nancy Anderson, Tom Avila, Staff Embedded Reporters: What Are Americans Getting? Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has suggested we are getting only “slices” of the war. Other observers have likened the media coverage to seeing the battlefield through “a soda straw.” The battle for Iraq is war as we’ve never it seen before. It is the first full-scale American military engagement in the age of the Internet, multiple cable channels and a mixed media culture that has stretched the definition of journalism. The most noted characteristic of the media coverage so far, however, is the new system of “embedding” some 600 journalists with American and British troops. What are Americans getting on television from this “embedded” reporting? How close to the action are the “embeds” getting? Who are they talking to? What are they talking about? To provide some framework for the discussion, the Project for Excellence in Journalism conducted a content analysis of the embedded reports on television during three of the first six days of the war. The Project is affiliated with Columbia University and funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts. The embedded coverage, the research found, is largely anecdotal. It’s both exciting and dull, combat focused, and mostly live and unedited. Much of it lacks context but it is usually rich in detail. It has all the virtues and vices of reporting only what you can see.
    [Show full text]
  • News Corporation 1 News Corporation
    News Corporation 1 News Corporation News Corporation Type Public [1] [2] [3] [4] Traded as ASX: NWS ASX: NWSLV NASDAQ: NWS NASDAQ: NWSA Industry Media conglomerate [5] [6] Founded Adelaide, Australia (1979) Founder(s) Rupert Murdoch Headquarters 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York City, New York 10036 U.S Area served Worldwide Key people Rupert Murdoch (Chairman & CEO) Chase Carey (President & COO) Products Films, Television, Cable Programming, Satellite Television, Magazines, Newspapers, Books, Sporting Events, Websites [7] Revenue US$ 32.778 billion (2010) [7] Operating income US$ 3.703 billion (2010) [7] Net income US$ 2.539 billion (2010) [7] Total assets US$ 54.384 billion (2010) [7] Total equity US$ 25.113 billion (2010) [8] Employees 51,000 (2010) Subsidiaries List of acquisitions [9] Website www.newscorp.com News Corporation 2 News Corporation (NASDAQ: NWS [3], NASDAQ: NWSA [4], ASX: NWS [1], ASX: NWSLV [2]), often abbreviated to News Corp., is the world's third-largest media conglomerate (behind The Walt Disney Company and Time Warner) as of 2008, and the world's third largest in entertainment as of 2009.[10] [11] [12] [13] The company's Chairman & Chief Executive Officer is Rupert Murdoch. News Corporation is a publicly traded company listed on the NASDAQ, with secondary listings on the Australian Securities Exchange. Formerly incorporated in South Australia, the company was re-incorporated under Delaware General Corporation Law after a majority of shareholders approved the move on November 12, 2004. At present, News Corporation is headquartered at 1211 Avenue of the Americas (Sixth Ave.), in New York City, in the newer 1960s-1970s corridor of the Rockefeller Center complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Journalists Tweet About the Final 2016 Presidential Debate Hannah Hopper East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2018 Political Journalists Tweet About the Final 2016 Presidential Debate Hannah Hopper East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the American Politics Commons, Communication Technology and New Media Commons, Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons, Journalism Studies Commons, Political Theory Commons, Social Influence and Political Communication Commons, and the Social Media Commons Recommended Citation Hopper, Hannah, "Political Journalists Tweet About the Final 2016 Presidential Debate" (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3402. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3402 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Political Journalists Tweet About the Final 2016 Presidential Debate _____________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Media and Communication East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Brand and Media Strategy _____________________ by Hannah Hopper May 2018 _____________________ Dr. Susan E. Waters, Chair Dr. Melanie Richards Dr. Phyllis Thompson Keywords: Political Journalist, Twitter, Agenda Setting, Framing, Gatekeeping, Feminist Political Theory, Political Polarization, Presidential Debate, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump ABSTRACT Political Journalists Tweet About the Final 2016 Presidential Debate by Hannah Hopper Past research shows that journalists are gatekeepers to information the public seeks.
    [Show full text]