DOCSLIB.ORG

Tracing the Apollo 12 Astronauts Through Time

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tracing the Apollo 12 Astronauts Through Time 51st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2020) 1578.pdf TREMORS AND TRACKS: TRACING THE APOLLO 12 ASTRONAUTS THROUGH TIME. N.R. Gonzales, J.A. Schulte, M.R. Henriksen, R.V. Wagner, M.S. Robinson, School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287 ([email protected], [email protected]). Introduction: Fifty years after Apollo 12 landed the astronauts were along the traverse. Then we refined on the Moon, we are still learning from mankind’s photo locations using local geology and the Sun angle excursion to the Ocean of Storms. A complete in the Hasselblad photos [1]. We matched equipment understanding of the formation history of the landing and sampling stations in the Hasselblad pictures to the site requires precise knowledge of where samples were descriptions in the transcripts [10-11] and audio [2]. collected, photos were taken, and equipment was We also converted PSE data [5] into real-time videos deployed. We documented astronaut activities from in MATLAB, then synchronized them with audio [2] Apollo data and subsequent studies [1-13] in a and video [3-4], producing one synchronized video per spatiotemporal map, drawing on methods devised for a EVA. Filling in gaps in the DAC and TV footage with similar effort on the Apollo 11 site [14]. For both the the real-time PSE data [5] refined the timing of each Apollo 11 and 12 sites we used images, audio, and performed task (Fig. 1). Apollo 12 had the first true video [1-4] to spatially locate points, then used geologic traverse on the Moon, making the precise transcripts [10-11] to temporally locate points, location of sample collection vital. However, during mapping the extravehicular activities (EVAs) with the EVAs, many samples were not put in numbered greater accuracy than has been accomplished to date. sample bags, and thus were not marked with a station A key goal of the Apollo 12 mission was to make a identifier. Sample collection sites found in prior precision landing, enabling the precise preplanning of studies [6-9, 12-13] were double checked and a geologic traverse. EVA-1 focused on deploying the expanded upon using Hasselblad photos and the LSC, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiment Package (ALSEP), leaving 6 samples from EVA-1, and 3 from EVA-2 photography, and sampling. EVA-2, considered the with several possible collection sites. We gave station first true geologic traverse on another celestial body, names to areas astronauts took photos and/or collected included photographic documentation [1], sample samples, following the format seen in [10]; our final collection [7-10], and a visit to a Copernican ray and map includes 71 named stations (Fig. 1). the Surveyor 3 spacecraft. Surveyor 3 (which landed in Error Analysis. We calculated the DAC framerate 1967 to perform robotic reconnaissance), offered at 17 frames/s by matching the timing of events in the Apollo 12 a precision landing target and equipment video footage to the same events in the real-time PSE retrieval opportunity - the first and only off-world visit videos, and determined DAC footage was digitized at a to a man-made, space explorer. faster rate than it was recorded. Comparing the length Data Sources: We used three categories of data: of time between the first and last comments in the 1) the Apollo 12 mission data generated between 1969- audio tracks and the transcripts [11] showed that the 1979 (Hasselblad and stereoscopic photos, audio audio was also digitized at a faster rate, with EVA-1 recordings, TV footage, Data Acquisition Camera audio 20 s short, and EVA-2 audio 2 min short, [DAC] footage, Passive Seismic Experiment [PSE] relative to times listed in the transcripts. We used the data, Mission Report [MR], Preliminary Science audio and DAC footage only for reconciliation of Report [PSR], Lunar Sample Compendium [LSC], timing issues of a few minutes, not over long periods Sutton and Schaber sample study) [1-9]; 2) transcripts of time. of astronaut communications [10-11]; and 3) recent Using transcripts [11] and PSE data, we established studies using Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera Ground Elapsed Times (GETs) for each mapped point. Narrow Angle Camera (LROC NAC) imagery [12-13]. When complete task timing was not well-constrained All new data is mapped on DTM-controlled NAC in the transcripts, we estimated GET from the times of images [15] (Fig. 1). task mentions in the transcripts, estimates of a While our spatiotemporal map of Apollo 11 relied reasonable task length, and astronaut movements heavily on synchronized audio and video [14], Apollo recorded by the PSE (when available). Without video, 12’s TV camera was pointed at the Sun ~40 min into the timing error averages at ±15 s, with a max of ±60 s. EVA-1, leaving Houston with only audio transmissions Transcripts used for GET calculations do not account for the remainder of their time on the Moon, presenting for the 1.25 s delay time for transmissions to reach us with a challenge. Our primary solution was to use Earth and do not include ground delay time [11]. the Hasselblad photos and transcripts in combination Spatially, all points are mapped relative to tracks with a new method for interpreting PSE data to seen in the NACs, and do not include activities that are temporally trace astronaut movements [5]. not seen in footprints in Hasselblad images, nor tasks Methodology: We followed the transcripts [10- that astronauts do not mention. Mapped astronaut 11] and tracks seen in the NACs to determine where movements have a max spatial error of ±2.5 m, 51st Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2020) 1578.pdf decreasing to ±0.33 m for points with many data tasks, and who performed each task. This sources. The NAC basemap has average offsets 0.5 m spatiotemporal map includes separate shapefile layers W by 1.3 m S from points in [16] (excluding the per EVA for: astronaut traverses, sampling, equipment, ALSEP, with an offset of >4 m, suggesting a stereoscopic photos, Hasselblad photos, EVA stations, difference in identification), within the confidence video camera fields-of-view, and notable landforms. A interval in [16]. simplified moment-by-moment reconstruction of the Conclusions: We determined the location of each two Apollo 12 EVAs is on the LROC website astronaut as a function of time, the order and timing of (http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/featured_sites/view_site/61). References: [1] (http://tothemoon.ser.asu.edu/gallery/apollo). [2] NASA JSC (2010) (https://archive.org/details/ Apollo12Audio). [3] Gray (2005) (http://spacehistory.tv/blog/?page_id=66). [4] NASA JSC, Apollo Film Archives, Vol. 1. [5] JAXA DARTS (2019) Moon Seismic Monitor. [6] Apollo 12 MR (1970) MSC-01855. [7] Apollo 12 PSR (1970) NASA-SP-235. [8] Meyer (2012) (https://curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/lsc/index.cfm). [9] Sutton & Schaber (1971) LSC II, 1, 17-2. [10] Bailey & Ulrich (1975) NASA-CR-145520. [11] Jones (2016) ALSJ, (https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12.html). [12] McInall (2018) (https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/A12_Grand_Traverse_Planimetric_Map-LROC_M175428601R_Mar_2018.jpg). [13] Schwagmeier & Jones (2011) (https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12TraversesOnM168353795R.jpg). [14] Gonzales et al. (2019) LPSC L, Abs. #3089. [15] Henriksen et al. (2015) PDW II, Abs. #7033. [16] Wagner et al. (2017) Icarus, 283, 90-103. Fig. 1. EVA station names, with samples and photos, overlaid on M175428601R. There are 30 stations in EVA-1, and 46 stations in EVA-2, 5 of which are seen in both. Stations without colored dots focused on equipment. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conceptual Human-System Interface Design for a Lunar Access Vehicle
    Conceptual Human-System Interface Design for a Lunar Access Vehicle Mary Cummings Enlie Wang Cristin Smith Jessica Marquez Mark Duppen Stephane Essama Massachusetts Institute of Technology* Prepared For Draper Labs Award #: SC001-018 PI: Dava Newman HAL2005-04 September, 2005 http://halab.mit.edu e-mail: [email protected] *MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Cambridge, MA 02139 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 THE GENERAL FRAMEWORK................................................................................ 1 1.2 ORGANIZATION.................................................................................................... 2 2 H-SI BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION ........................................................ 3 2.1 APOLLO VS. LAV H-SI........................................................................................ 3 2.2 APOLLO VS. LUNAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS ...................................................... 4 3 THE LAV CONCEPTUAL PROTOTYPE............................................................ 5 3.1 HS-I DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................ 5 3.2 THE CONCEPTUAL PROTOTYPE ............................................................................ 6 3.3 LANDING ZONE (LZ) DISPLAY............................................................................. 8 3.3.1 LZ Display Introduction.................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo 11 Astronaut Neil Armstrong Broadcast from the Moon (July 21, 1969) Added to the National Registry: 2004 Essay by Cary O’Dell
    Apollo 11 Astronaut Neil Armstrong Broadcast from the Moon (July 21, 1969) Added to the National Registry: 2004 Essay by Cary O’Dell “One small step for…” Though no American has stepped onto the surface of the moon since 1972, the exiting of the Earth’s atmosphere today is almost commonplace. Once covered live over all TV and radio networks, increasingly US space launches have been relegated to a fleeting mention on the nightly news, if mentioned at all. But there was a time when leaving the planet got the full attention it deserved. Certainly it did in July of 1969 when an American man, Neil Armstrong, became the first human being to ever step foot on the moon’s surface. The pictures he took and the reports he sent back to Earth stopped the world in its tracks, especially his eloquent opening salvo which became as famous and as known to most citizens as any words ever spoken. The mid-1969 mission of NASA’s Apollo 11 mission became the defining moment of the US- USSR “Space Race” usually dated as the period between 1957 and 1975 when the world’s two superpowers were competing to top each other in technological advances and scientific knowledge (and bragging rights) related to, truly, the “final frontier.” There were three astronauts on the Apollo 11 spacecraft, the US’s fifth manned spaced mission, and the third lunar mission of the Apollo program. They were: Neil Armstrong, Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin, and Michael Collins. The trio was launched from Kennedy Space Center in Florida on July 16, 1969 at 1:32pm.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moon Is a Harsh Chromatogram: the Most Strategic Knowledge Gap (Skg) at the Lunar Surface E
    50th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2019 (LPI Contrib. No. 2132) 2766.pdf THE MOON IS A HARSH CHROMATOGRAM: THE MOST STRATEGIC KNOWLEDGE GAP (SKG) AT THE LUNAR SURFACE E. Patrick, R. Blase, M. Libardoni, Southwest Research Institute®, 6220 Culebra Rd., San Antonio, TX 78238 ([email protected]) Introduction: Data from analytical instruments de- a gas chromatograph mass spectrometer (GCMS) and ployed during multiple lunar missions, combined with revealed 97% of the composition in that mass channel laboratory results[1], suggest the regolith surface of the to be N2. Henderson et al.[5] also identified amino ac- Moon traps more volatiles in gas-surface interactions ids which were attributed to contamination, but results than is currently understood. We assert that the lunar from recent more sensitive LCMS and GCMS experi- surface behaves as a giant 3-D surface chromatogram, ments by Elsila et al.[1] found some amino acid and separating gas molecules by species as each wafts other organic signatures to be extraterrestrial in origin. across the regolith according to its mobility and ad- While these and other investigations suggest contami- sorption characteristics before eventually becoming nation from the Apollo spacecraft as a likely source for trapped. Herein we present supporting evicence for this a number of observed signatures[1,2,4,5], what is not claim. explained is the nature of the trapping mechanism for In gas chromatography (GC), components of a the N2 feature in 10086, and demonstrates gas retention sample are separated within a column according to from a gas that, under most circumstances, exhibits no their individual partitioning coefficients and by such retention at temperatures around 300 K[3].
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrate Apollo
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Celebrate Apollo Exploring The Moon, Discovering Earth “…We go into space because whatever mankind must undertake, free men must fully share. … I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to Earth. No single space project in this period will be more exciting, or more impressive to mankind, or more important for the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish …” President John F. Kennedy May 25, 1961 Celebrate Apollo Exploring The Moon, Discovering Earth Less than five months into his new administration, on May 25, 1961, President John F. Kennedy, announced the dramatic and ambitious goal of sending an American safely to the moon before the end of the decade. Coming just three weeks after Mercury astronaut Alan Shepard became the first American in space, Kennedy’s bold challenge that historic spring day set the nation on a journey unparalleled in human history. Just eight years later, on July 20, 1969, Apollo 11 commander Neil Armstrong stepped out of the lunar module, taking “one small step” in the Sea of Tranquility, thus achieving “one giant leap for mankind,” and demonstrating to the world that the collective will of the nation was strong enough to overcome any obstacle. It was an achievement that would be repeated five other times between 1969 and 1972. By the time the Apollo 17 mission ended, 12 astronauts had explored the surface of the moon, and the collective contributions of hundreds of thousands of engineers, scientists, astronauts and employees of NASA served to inspire our nation and the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lunar Dust-Plasma Environment Is Crucial
    TheThe LunarLunar DustDust --PlasmaPlasma EnvironmentEnvironment Timothy J. Stubbs 1,2 , William M. Farrell 2, Jasper S. Halekas 3, Michael R. Collier 2, Richard R. Vondrak 2, & Gregory T. Delory 3 [email protected] Lunar X-ray Observatory(LXO)/ Magnetosheath Explorer (MagEX) meeting, Hilton Garden Inn, October 25, 2007. 1 University of Maryland, Baltimore County 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 3 University of California, Berkeley TheThe ApolloApollo AstronautAstronaut ExperienceExperience ofof thethe LunarLunar DustDust --PlasmaPlasma EnvironmentEnvironment “… one of the most aggravating, restricting facets of lunar surface exploration is the dust and its adherence to everything no matter what kind of material, whether it be skin, suit material, metal, no matter what it be and it’s restrictive friction-like action to everything it gets on. ” Eugene Cernan, Commander Apollo 17. EvidenceEvidence forfor DustDust AboveAbove thethe LunarLunar SurfaceSurface Horizon glow from forward scattered sunlight • Dust grains with radius of 5 – 6 m at about 10 to 30 cm from the surface, where electrostatic and gravitational forces balance. • Horizon glow ~10 7 too bright to be explained by micro-meteoroid- generated ejecta [Zook et al., 1995]. Composite image of morning and evening of local western horizon [Criswell, 1973]. DustDust ObservedObserved atat HighHigh AltitudesAltitudes fromfrom OrbitOrbit Schematic of situation consistent with Apollo 17 observations [McCoy, 1976]. Lunar dust at high altitudes (up to ~100 km). 0.1 m-scale dust present Gene Cernan sketches sporadically (~minutes). [McCoy and Criswell, 1974]. InIn --SituSitu EvidenceEvidence forfor DustDust TransportTransport Terminators Berg et al. [1976] Apollo 17 Lunar Ejecta and Meteorites (LEAM) experiment. PossiblePossible DustyDusty HorizonHorizon GlowGlow seenseen byby ClementineClementine StarStar Tracker?Tracker? Above: image of possible horizon glow above the lunar surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanity and Space
    10/17/2012!! !!!!!! Project Number: MH-1207 Humanity and Space An Interactive Qualifying Project Submitted to WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by: Matthew Beck Jillian Chalke Matthew Chase Julia Rugo Professor Mayer H. Humi, Project Advisor Abstract Our IQP investigates the possible functionality of another celestial body as an alternate home for mankind. This project explores the necessary technological advances for moving forward into the future of space travel and human development on the Moon and Mars. Mars is the optimal candidate for future human colonization and a stepping stone towards humanity’s expansion into outer space. Our group concluded space travel and interplanetary exploration is possible, however international political cooperation and stability is necessary for such accomplishments. 2 Executive Summary This report provides insight into extraterrestrial exploration and colonization with regards to technology and human biology. Multiple locations have been taken into consideration for potential development, with such qualifying specifications as resources, atmospheric conditions, hazards, and the environment. Methods of analysis include essential research through online media and library resources, an interview with NASA about the upcoming Curiosity mission to Mars, and the assessment of data through mathematical equations. Our findings concerning the human aspect of space exploration state that humanity is not yet ready politically and will not be able to biologically withstand the hazards of long-term space travel. Additionally, in the field of robotics, we have the necessary hardware to implement adequate operational systems yet humanity lacks the software to implement rudimentary Artificial Intelligence. Findings regarding the physics behind rocketry and space navigation have revealed that the science of spacecraft is well-established.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power on the Moon Atomic Energy Has Been Operating on the Moon Since the Flight in November of Apollo 12
    nuclear power on the moon Atomic energy has been operating on the moon since the flight in November of Apollo 12. Astronauts Charles Conrad and Allan Bean, the second pair of men to walk on the surface of the moon, took with them a nuclear generator and set it in position to provide the electricity to operate scientific instruments and subsystems which are providing continuing information. In his report at the end of 1969 Dr. Glenn T. Seaborg, Chairman of the US Atomic Energy Commission, was able to report that the generator was successfully withstanding immense temperature variations. Some details are given in this article. The nuclear assembly was carried on the outside of the lunar module on its journey to the moon. This allowed the heat generated by the fuel capsule to be dispersed in space and for adequate shielding to protect the astronauts. The power is provided by SNAP-27, one of a series of radioisotope thermoelectric generators, or atomic batteries, developed by the Atomic Energy Commission. The SNAP (Systems for Nuclear Auxiliary Power) programme is directed at development of generators and reactors for use in space, on land and in die sea. While nuclear heaters were used in the seismometer package on Apollo 11, SNAP-2 7 on Apollo 12 marked the first use of a nuclear electrical power system on die moon. It was designed to provide all the electricity for continuous one-year operation of die National Aero­ nautics and Space Administration (NASA) scientific instruments and supporting subsystems deployed by the astronauts on the lunar surface.
    [Show full text]
  • 9. Lunar Surface Closeup Stereoscopic Photography
    9. Lunar Surface Closeup Stereoscopic Photography The lunar samples returned by the Apollo 11 launch with sufficient Ektachrome MS ( SO368 ) mission have provided preliminary information film for the complete mission. To obtain a photo- about the physical and chemical properties of graph, an astronaut merely sets the camera over the Moon and, in particular, about Tranquility the material to be photographed and depresses Base. Because of the mechanical environment to the trigger located on the camera handle. When which lunar samples are subjected during their the exposure is complete, the film is automatically return from the Moon, limited information can be advanced to the next frame, and the electronic obtained from lunar samples about the structure flash is recharged. and texture of the loose, fine-grained material that composes the upper surface of the lunar crust. A stereoscopic camera capable of photo- graphing the small-scale ( between micro and macro) lunar surface features was suggested by Thomas Gold, Cornell University, and built under contract for NASA. The photographs taken on the mission with the closeup stereoscopic camera are of outstand- ing quality and show in detail the nature of the lunar surface material. Several photographs con- tain unusual features. From the photographs, information can be derived about the small-scale lunar surface geologic features and about proc- esses occurring on the surface. This chapter presents a description of the closeup stereoscopic camera, lists and shows single photos from pairs available for stereoscopic study, and contains an interpretation of the results reported by Profes- sor Gold in Science, vol. 165, no.
    [Show full text]
  • CRATER IMAGE METADATA EARTH IMAGES Country Or BMM Date Camera/ Lens Focal Image Image ID# LAT
    CRATER IMAGE METADATA EARTH IMAGES Country or BMM Date Camera/ Lens Focal Image Image ID# LAT. LONG. Crater Name Geographic Acquired Instrument Length # Region E4: Kodak ISS006-E-16068 27.8S 16.4E Roter Kamm Namibia 12/28/2002 400 mm 1 DCS760C E4: Kodak ISS012-E-15881 51.5N 68.5W Manicouagan Canada 1/24/2006 50 mm 2 DCS760C E4: Kodak ISS014-E-11841 24.4N 24.4E Oasis Libya 1/13/2007 400 mm 3 DCS760C E4: Kodak ISS014-E-15775 35N 111W Barringer United States 3/1/2007 400 mm 4 DCS760C E4: Kodak ISS014-E-19496 29N 7.6W Ouarkziz Algeria 4/16/2007 800 mm 5 DCS760C E4: Kodak ISS015-E-17360 23.9S 132.3E Gosses Bluff Australia 7/13/2007 400 mm 6 DCS760C ISS018-E-14908 22.9N 10.4W Tenoumer Mauritania 12/20/2008 Nikon D2X 800 mm 7 ISS018-E-23713 20N 76.5E Lonar India 1/28/2009 Nikon D2X 800 mm 8 STS51I-33-56AA 27S 27.3E Vredefort South Africa 8/29/1985 Hasselblad 250 mm Clearwater STS61A-35-86 56.5N 74.7W Lakes Canada 11/1/1985 Hasselblad 250 mm (East & West) ISS028-E-14782 25.52S 120.53E Shoemaker Australia 7/6/2011 Nikon D2X 200 mm ISS034-E-29105 17.32S 128.25E Piccaninny Australia 1/15/2013 Nikon D2X 180 mm CRATER IMAGE METADATA MARS IMAGES BMM Geographic *Date or Camera/ Image Image ID# LAT. LONG. Crater Name Approx. YR Mission Name Region Instrument # Acquired PIA14290 5.4S 137.8E Gale Aeolis Mensae 2000's THEMIS IR Odyssey THEMIS IR Aeolis 14.5S 175.4E Gusev 2000's THEMIS IR Odyssey MOSAIC Quadrangle Mars Orbiter Colorized MOLA 42S 67E Hellas Basin Hellas Planitia 2000's Laser Altimeter Global Surveyor (MOLA) Viking Orbiter Margaritifer Visual
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Years of Dust on the Moon: from Apollo to Cheng'e-4
    DUST ON THE MOON: FROM APOLLO TO CHENG’E-4 Prof. Brian J. O’Brien School of Physics, University of Western Australia [email protected] www.uwa.edu.au/people/brian.obrien Ph. 61 8 9387 3827 DAP2017 Boulder, Colorado 12 January 2017 Presented by courtesy of Dr William M. Farrell, GSFC LDAP2010: OVERVIEW BY O’BRIEN 1. 1st REVIEW OF DDE, TDS AND LEAM EXPTS 2. DDE: 8 DISCOVERIES O’Brien 1970-2009 3. TDS: FIRST MODERN DISCUSSION GOLD’s DISCOVERY OF COHESIVE FORCES IN 1971 4. LEAM: SUGGESTED ALTERNATIVE CAUSE AS NOISE BITS IN BURSTS, PERHAPS FROM EMI 5. FINAL O’B IN 2011 “BUT WHO WILL LISTEN?” 6. LADEE FINDINGS CONSISTENT WITH #3 + #4? COHESIVE FORCES OF LUNAR DUST SURFACE DUST ON MOON: MAJOR ITEMS SINCE LDAP2010 O’BRIEN 2010-16 CHENG’E-3 & CHENG’E-4 • 2011:O’BRIEN LDAP-2010 • CHENG’E-3 & YUTU doi:10.1016/j.pss.2011.04.016 • YUTU FIFTH LUNAR ROVER • 2013: LUNAR WEATHER AT • IN 2013 FIRST IN 40 YEARS 3 APOLLO SITES • MOVED 100m LUNAR DAY 1 http:dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pss. • NO MOVEMENTS AFTER 1st 2013.1002/2013SW000978 SUNRISE: WHY NOT? • 2015: SUNRISE-DRIVEN GROUND-TRUTH FACTS • CHENG’E-4 (2018): dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2015 #1 PRIORITY CHANGED 2016 .09.018 TO LUNAR DUST STUDIES SUNRISE DRIVEN EFFECTS APOLLO 12 DUST SYNERGIES WITH 2 SOLAR DETECTOR DDE CELLS AT RIGHT ANGLES INVENTED 12/01/1966 1 VSCE VERTICAL SOLAR CELL FACES EAST (SUNRISE MAX) 2 HSC HORIZONTAL CELL FACING UP (NOON MAX.).
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo 12 Press
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION TELS' wo 2-4155 WASHINGTON,D.C. 20546 WO 3-6925 FOR RELEASE: WEDNESDAY P.M. November 5, 1969 RELEASE NO: 69-148 PROJECT: APOLLO 12 p (To be launched no earlier than Nov. 14) R contents E GENERAL RELEASE---------------------------------------------l-6 APOLLO 12 C OUN'l'DOWN-----------------------------------------7 -9 LAUNCH, MISSION TRAJECTORY AND MANEUVER DESCRIPTION---------10 Launch---------------------------------------------------10-ll s --------------------------------------------12 Launch Events Apollo 12 Mission Events---------------------------------13-18 Earth Parking Orbit (EP0)--------------------------------19 s Translunar Injection (TLI)-------------------------------19 Transposition, Docking and Ejection (TD&E)---------------19 · Translunar Coast-----------------------------------------19-20 Lunar Orbit Insertion (LOI)------------------------------20 Lunar Module Descent Lunar Landing-----------------------20-21 Powered Descent Events--------------------------- Lunar Surface Exploration--------------------------------23-24 Ascent, Lunar Orbit Rendezvous---------------------------25 Ascent Stage Deorbit-------------------------------------26 Transearth Injection (TEI)------------------------------26 K Transearth Coast-----------------------------------------26 Entry� Landing-------------------------------------------26 -------------------------------------------------------------- , I f I DEDICATION I I: I I T J This press kit is dedicated to the memory of Science :1 Editor William
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Lunar Dust on Human Exploration
    The Impact of Lunar Dust on Human Exploration The Impact of Lunar Dust on Human Exploration Edited by Joel S. Levine The Impact of Lunar Dust on Human Exploration Edited by Joel S. Levine This book first published 2021 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2021 by Joel S. Levine and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-6308-1 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-6308-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ......................................................................................................... x Joel S. Levine Remembrance. Brian J. O’Brien: From the Earth to the Moon ................ xvi Rick Chappell, Jim Burch, Patricia Reiff, and Jackie Reasoner Section One: The Apollo Experience and Preparing for the Artemis Missions Chapter One ................................................................................................. 2 Measurements of Surface Moondust and Its Movement on the Apollo Missions: A Personal Journey Brian J. O’Brien Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 41 Lunar Dust and Its Impact on Human Exploration: Identifying the Problems
    [Show full text]