<I>Scolymia Cubensis</I> (Milne Edwards

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

<I>Scolymia Cubensis</I> (Milne Edwards INTERSPECIFIC AGGRESSION BY SCLERACTINIAN CORALS. 1. THE REDISCOVERY OF SCOLYMIA CUBENSlS (MILNE EDWARDS & HAIME) JUDITH LANG Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, P. O. Box 2072, Balboa, Canal Zone, and Discovery Bay Marine Laboratory, Discovery Bay, Jamaica ABSTRACT The solitary sc1eractinian coral, Scolymia cubensis, was recently con- sidered to be an "ecovariant" of S. lacera. As the latter invariably kills the tissues of S. cubensis by an extracoelenteric feeding response, while con- trol individuals of S. lacera never damage each other, S. cubensis is again separated as a distinct species. S. lacera is one of the two most "aggres- sive" corals in Jamaica, while S. cubensis ranks ninth in the "aggression hierarchy." Small aggressors such as the Scolymias damage subordinate species which compete for their space and light. The system of classification of the stony corals in present use is based almost entirely upon skeletal characters (Vaughan & Wells, 1943; Wells, 1956; Goreau, 1961). In practice this method suffers from severe limita- tions, as it often cannot discriminate habitat-induced variations within a species from diversity between species. Variations in the shape of the coralla of reef corals may be due to environmental factors such as light, currents, sedimentation, substrate, and interactions with neighboring or- ganisms. The scleractinian coral Scolymia is one example of a genus within which the morphological and ecological characteristics of two distinct species so overlap that their differentiation was doubted until aggressive interactions were discovered to occur between them. Catala (1964) first observed the interactions of two Pacific corals, Trachyphyllia geoffreyi and Cynarina lachrymalis, in his aquaria at New Caledonia. He described a "bridge" of tentacles which joined the polyps together for several days until both died. However, in the illustrative photo- graph (Catala, 1964: pI. 1, f. 4), they appear rather to be connected to each other by mesenterial filaments. According to Catala, this phenomenon, which he called "reciprocal cannibalism," only occurred among certain species in overcrowded aquaria. I was not aware of Catala's observation when I placed two supposed "ecovariants" of the solitary mussid coral Scolymia lacera (Pallas) be- side each other in Jamaica in 1967. The tissues of the polyp of one of these "ecovariants" were more fleshy, verrucose, and lighter green than those of the other. After several hours, mesenterial filaments of this "fleshy" 1971] Lang: I nterspecijic Aggression by Scleractinian Corals 953 FIGURE I. The extracoelenteric feeding response of Scolymia lacera (lighter coral, on the left) to Scolymia cubensis. Sc1eroseptaof the damaged S. cubensis can be seen underlying the extruded mesenterial filaments of the S. lacera. Scolymia were extruded through temporary openings in the polyp wall, and penetrated the adjacent part of the coelenteron, or body cavity, of the less fleshy, smooth variant. In less than 12 hours, they had completely digested the tissues of the latter within a radius of about 2 cm from the zone of contact, thereby exposing the underlying skeleton. Elsewhere the coeno- sarc of the "victimized" coral remained healthy. Initially, mesenterial fila- ments of the "smooth" Scolymia appeared at the ectodermal surface, but they were evidently unable to damage the filaments of the fleshy Scolymia, and were later withdrawn from the area under attack. This act of agres- sion was basically an extracoelenteric feeding response, such as Carpenter (1910), Yonge (1930), and Goreau (1956) have described in mussid and faviid corals presented with pieces of animal food which were too large to be transported into the stomodaeum by the ectodermal feeding currents. Further experiments were made with over 400 individuals of Scolymia from the northern and southern coasts of Jamaica. The fleshy, verrucose individuals of S. lacera invariably digested those tissues of the smooth variants that were within reach of their mesenterial filaments (Fig. 1). 954 Bulletin at Marine Science [21( 4) TABLE 1 AGGRESSIVE INTERACTIONS AMONG Mussa angulosa, 1sophyllia sinuosa, Scolymia lacera AND S. cubensis (Number of trials: More than 100 of each.) S. lacera S. cubensis ("fleshy ("smooth M. angulosa I. sil1110sa Scolymia") Scolymia") M. angulosa 0 0 0 ~ 1. sinuosa 0 0 0 ~ S. lacera 0 0 0 ~ ("fleshy Scolymia") S. cubensis ~ ~ ~ 0 ("smooth Scolymia") ...• The coral in the horizontal column injures the coral in the vertical column. ~ The coral in the vertical column injures the coral in the horizontal column. o No interaction. As shown in Table 1, the controls, which were pairs of either fleshy or smooth individuals, never attacked each other. When a number of differ- ent corals were brought into contact, the fleshy Scolymia damaged every other Jamaican species, except two colonial mussids, Mussa angulosa (Pal- las), and Isophyllia sinuosa (Ellis & Solander), with which it did not inter- act. Under the same conditions, the smooth Scolymia was attacked by four other species of mussid and meandrinid corals in addition to M. angulosa, T.sinuosa and the fleshy Scolymia. The skeletons of the "aggressive" Scolymia have thick primary septa, coarse septal teeth, concave or flattened calices, and a maximum diameter of at least 15 em. The "subordinate" Scolymia has flat or convex calices, narrow septa, smaller septal teeth, and a maximum diameter of about 10 em. The coralla of both forms become columniform in muddy environ- ments, raising the polyps above the region of disturbed sediments. Goreau, who found these two Scolymias in Jamaica, had believed that they were ecovariants of the same species, because the smooth form is often found growing under conditions of lower ambient illumination than the fleshy variant. However, the absolute correlation of morphological and behavioral differences suggests now that separate species are involved. Wells (1971) has made a detailed examination of the coralla of the two forms, confirm- ing that the aggressive Scolymia is S. lacera. The smooth subordinate form turns out to be Scolymia cubensis, originally described by Milne Edwards & Haime in 1849 from specimens in the Paris Museum. These remained the only known examples of this species until its rediscovery in Jamaica. Extracoelenteric feeding interactions, which are found to occur between 1971] Lang: Interspecific Aggression by Scleractinian Corals 955 many species of Jamaican reef corals, have a definite and consistent hi- erarchical structure (Lang, manuscript). S. lacera and M. angulosa are the most aggressive, while S. cubensis ranks ninth, in a total of 52 species. Most aggressors are contained within the families Mussidae, Meandrinidae and Faviidae (all suborder Faviina), members of which were thought by Gareau (1956) to extrude mesenterial filaments and feed by means of extracoelenteric forms of digestion more readily than other corals. S. lacera injures S. cubensis and other subordinates whenever their polyps are in contact, and may simultaneously attack two or more neighboring corals. Aggressors may prove to have chemoreceptors on their ectodermal surfaces which are specifically stimulated by particular molecules asso- ciated with the surfaces of subordinate corals, for S. lacera does not inter- act with M. angulosa and with l. sinl/osa, or with other individuals of S. lacera, even when it is killing other species of corals. When mesenterial filaments on one side of a S. cubensis are damaging a less aggressive coral, in another area the same individual may be under attack from S. lacera or other species higher in the aggression hierarchy. Interspecific aggression in Scolymia persists even when the animals are subjected to extreme physiological stresses, such as starvation and con- tinued darkness. For example, two individuals of S. lacera and two of S. cubensis were kept without being fed in a closed, aerated aquarium for 155 days. Their polyps slowly regressed, and the individuals of S. lacera in particular lost most of their zooxanthellae. Nevertheless, when these starved corals were put together, the S. lacera completely digested the adjacent tis- sues of the S. cubensis a few hours after contact. Other individuals of S. lacera, from which zooxanthellae were removed by bleaching in darkened aquaria, or by placing in dark crevices on the fore-reef slope, attacked all normal, or bleached individuals of S. cubensis. A S. lacera, which was kept in a running sea-water aquarium under low light intensi- ties, gradually bleached over a period of a year, and its tissues slowly re- gressed to such an extent that the polyp was eventually detached from its corallum without damage (as described by Goreau & Goreau, 1959). This skeletonless polyp fed extracoelenterically on subordinate corals, such as S. cubensis. Extracoelenteric feeding interactions were initially studied among corals in aquaria. By transplanting specimens collected at 50 meters on the fore- reef slope, S. lacera has been made to interact underwater with S. cubensis in various habitat zones of the reef, at depths ranging from just below the surface to more than 65 meters. However, when Scolymias are transferred to an unshaded part of the reef flat, at a depth of less than one meter, S. lacera loses some of its aggressiveness, and may fail to attack S. cubensis. Under these conditions, both species bleach due to mass expulsion of zoo- xanthellae, their tissues contract, and mesenterial filaments may be ex- 956 Bulletin of Marine Science [21 (4) FIGURE 2. Scolymia {acera (smaller coral, on the right) growing beside S. cubensis, which it has killed at the region of contact, at 30 meters on a sill reef at Discovery Bay, Jamaica. truded through their stomodaea and polyp walls. S. cubensis usually dies within 4 to 7 days, while S. lacera may survive for at least 2 months. Con- trol individuals of S. lacera in shaded crevices damage shaded individuals of S. cubensis, and show no other symptoms of what might be called the "light shocked" condition. Aggressive interactions between reef corals such as S. lacera and S. cubensis occur in at least two other populations of West Indian corals.
Recommended publications
  • The Reef Corridor of the Southwest Gulf of Mexico: Challenges for Its Management and Conservation
    Ocean & Coastal Management 86 (2013) 22e32 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ocean & Coastal Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ocecoaman The Reef Corridor of the Southwest Gulf of Mexico: Challenges for its management and conservation Leonardo Ortiz-Lozano a,*, Horacio Pérez-España b,c, Alejandro Granados-Barba a, Carlos González-Gándara d, Ana Gutiérrez-Velázquez e, Javier Martos d a Análisis y Síntesis de Zonas Costeras, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Pesquerías, Universidad Veracruzana, Av. Hidalgo #617, Col. Río Jamapa 94290, Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico b Arrecifes Coralinos, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Pesquerías, Universidad Veracruzana, Av. Hidalgo #617, Col. Río Jamapa 94290, Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico c Centro de Investigación de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Autónoma del Carmen, Av. Laguna de Términos s/n, Col. Renovación 2da sección, CP 24155, Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche, Mexico d Laboratorio de Arrecifes Coralinos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Zona Poza Rica Tuxpan, Universidad Veracruzana, Carr. Tuxpan.- Tampico km 7.5, Col. Universitaria, CP 92860, Tuxpan, Veracruz, Mexico e Posgrado. Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Departamento de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal, Apartado Postal 63, Xalapa 91000, Veracruz, Mexico article info abstract Article history: Flow of species and spatial continuity of biological processes between geographically separated areas Available online may be achieved using management tools known as Ecological Corridors (EC). In this paper we propose an EC composed of three highly threatened coral reef systems in the Southwest Gulf of Mexico: Sistema Arrecifal Lobos Tuxpan, Sistema Arrecifal Veracruzano and Arrecifes de los Tuxtlas. The proposed EC is supported by the concept of Marine Protected Areas Networks, which highlights the biogeographical and habitat heterogeneity representations as the main criteria to the establishment of this kind of networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy and Phylogenetic Relationships of the Coral Genera Australomussa and Parascolymia (Scleractinia, Lobophylliidae)
    Contributions to Zoology, 83 (3) 195-215 (2014) Taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of the coral genera Australomussa and Parascolymia (Scleractinia, Lobophylliidae) Roberto Arrigoni1, 7, Zoe T. Richards2, Chaolun Allen Chen3, 4, Andrew H. Baird5, Francesca Benzoni1, 6 1 Dept. of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126, Milan, Italy 2 Aquatic Zoology, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, WA 6106, Australia 3Biodiversity Research Centre, Academia Sinica, Nangang, Taipei 115, Taiwan 4 Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan 5 ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia 6 Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR227 Coreus2, 101 Promenade Roger Laroque, BP A5, 98848 Noumea Cedex, New Caledonia 7 E-mail: [email protected] Key words: COI, evolution, histone H3, Lobophyllia, Pacific Ocean, rDNA, Symphyllia, systematics, taxonomic revision Abstract Molecular phylogeny of P. rowleyensis and P. vitiensis . 209 Utility of the examined molecular markers ....................... 209 Novel micromorphological characters in combination with mo- Acknowledgements ...................................................................... 210 lecular studies have led to an extensive revision of the taxonomy References ...................................................................................... 210 and systematics of scleractinian corals. In the present work, we Appendix .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Composition and Ecology of Deep-Water Coral Associations D
    HELGOLK---~DER MEERESUNTERSUCHUNGEN Helgoltinder Meeresunters. 36, 183-204 (1983) Composition and ecology of deep-water coral associations D. H. H. Kfihlmann Museum ffir Naturkunde, Humboldt-Universit~t Berlin; Invalidenstr. 43, DDR- 1040 Berlin, German Democratic Republic ABSTRACT: Between 1966 and 1978 SCUBA investigations were carried out in French Polynesia, the Red Sea, and the Caribbean, at depths down to 70 m. Although there are fewer coral species in the Caribbean, the abundance of Scleractinia in deep-water associations below 20 m almost equals that in the Indian and Pacific Oceans. The assemblages of corals living there are described and defined as deep-water coral associations. They are characterized by large, flattened growth forms. Only 6 to 7 % of the species occur exclusively below 20 m. More than 90 % of the corals recorded in deep waters also live in shallow regions. Depth-related illumination is not responsible for depth differentiations of coral associations, but very likely, a complex of mechanical factors, such as hydrodynamic conditions, substrate conditions, sedimentation etc. However, light intensity deter- mines the general distribution of hermatypic Scleractinia in their bathymetric range as well as the platelike shape of coral colonies characteristic for deep water associations. Depending on mechani- cal factors, Leptoseris, Montipora, Porites and Pachyseris dominate as characteristic genera in the Central Pacific Ocean, Podabacia, Leptoseris, Pachyseris and Coscinarea in the Red Sea, Agaricia and Leptoseris in the tropical western Atlantic Ocean. INTRODUCTION Considerable attention has been paid to shallow-water coral associations since the first half of this century (Duerden, 1902; Mayer, 1918; Umbgrove, 1939). Detailed investigations at depths down to 20 m became possible only through the use of autono- mous diving apparatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology Subtropical Epibenthos Varies with Location, Reef Type, and Grazing Intensity
    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 509 (2018) 54–65 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe Subtropical epibenthos varies with location, reef type, and grazing intensity T ⁎ Kara R. Wall , Christopher D. Stallings College of Marine Science, University of South Florida, 140 7th Ave, St Petersburg, FL 33705, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Composition of marine epibenthic communities are influenced by both physical and biotic processes. For in- West Florida Shelf stance, the larval supply and cues that influence colonization (physical), as well as the growth and mortality of Coral individuals (biotoic), may differ across location and reef type. Determining the relative influence of these pro- Warm temperate cesses is important to understanding how epibenthic communities can develop in a region. Using both a partial Fouling caging experiment that controlled grazing by urchins and in situ photographic surveys of epibenthic commu- Habitat heterogeneity Settlement nities, this study examined the relationship between urchin grazing and the composition of epibenthos on natural limestone and artificial reefs in the eastern Gulf of Mexico (eGOM). In the experiment, tiles that were open to urchin grazing had lower percent cover of algae (−12%) and higher cover of crustose coralline algae (CCA) (13%) than those that excluded urchins. Patterns in tile cover were likely the result of CCA either resisting grazing mortality or recolonizing exposed areas after algae were removed. Variation in colonization was ob- served between inshore and offshore reef groups. Urchin density was positively correlated with the structural complexity of the habitats, which was higher on artificial reefs than natural ones, a factor that potentially had important effects on several observed patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2. Animals
    AC20 Doc. 8.5 Annex (English only/Seulement en anglais/Únicamente en inglés) REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT TRADE ANALYSIS OF TRADE TRENDS WITH NOTES ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF SELECTED SPECIES Volume 2. Animals Prepared for the CITES Animals Committee, CITES Secretariat by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre JANUARY 2004 AC20 Doc. 8.5 – p. 3 Prepared and produced by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE (UNEP-WCMC) www.unep-wcmc.org The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision-makers recognise the value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this knowledge to all that they do. The Centre’s challenge is to transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services that include ecosystem assessments, support for implementation of environmental agreements, regional and global biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and development of future scenarios for the living world. Prepared for: The CITES Secretariat, Geneva A contribution to UNEP - The United Nations Environment Programme Printed by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK © Copyright: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre/CITES Secretariat The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Voestalpine Essential Fish Habitat Assessment for PSD Greenhouse Gas Permit
    Essential Fish Habitat Assessment: Texas Project Site voestalpine Stahl GmbH San Patricio County, Texas January 31, 2013 www.erm.com voestalpine Stahl GmbH Essential Fish Habitat Assessment: Texas Project Site January 31, 2013 Project No. 0172451 San Patricio County, Texas Alicia Smith Partner-in-Charge Graham Donaldson Project Manager Travis Wycoff Project Consultant Environmental Resources Management 15810 Park Ten Place, Suite 300 Houston, Texas 77084-5140 T: 281-600-1000 F: 281-600-1001 Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-2393 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VI 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PROPOSED ACTION 1 1.2 AGENCY REGULATIONS 1 1.2.1 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 1 1.2.1 Essential Fish Habitat Defined 2 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4 2.1 PROJECT SCHEDULE 4 2.2 PROJECT LOCATION 4 2.3 SITE DESCRIPTION 5 2.4 SITE HISTORY 7 2.5 EMISSIONS CONTROLS 8 2.6 NOISE 9 2.7 DUST 10 2.8 WATER AND WASTEWATER 10 2.8.1 Water Sourcing and Water Rights 11 2.8.2 Wastewater Discharge 13 3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF THE ACTION AREA 15 3.1 ACTION AREA DEFINED 15 3.2 ACTION AREA DELINEATION METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS 16 3.2.1 Significant Impact Level Dispersion Modeling 16 3.2.2 Other Contaminants 17 4.0 ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROJECT 19 4.1 SPECIES OF PARTICULAR CONCERN 19 4.1.1 Brown Shrimp 19 4.1.2 Gray Snapper 20 4.1.3 Pink Shrimp 20 4.1.4 Red Drum 20 4.1.5 Spanish Mackerel 21 4.1.6 White Shrimp 21 4.2 HABITAT AREAS OF PARTICULAR CONCERN 22 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE CONDITIONS AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS
    [Show full text]
  • Effecten Van Fosfaat Addities
    The potential Outstanding Universal Value and natural heritage values of Bonaire National Marine Park: an ecological perspective I.J.M. van Beek, J.S.M. Cremer, H.W.G. Meesters, L.E. Becking, J. M. Langley (consultant) Report number C145/14 IMARES Wageningen UR (IMARES - Institute for Marine Resources & Ecosystem Studies) Client: Ministry of Economic Affairs Postbus 20401 2500 EK Den Haag BAS code: BO-11-011.05-037 Publication date: October 2014 IMARES vision: ‘To explore the potential of marine nature to improve the quality of life’. IMARES mission: To conduct research with the aim of acquiring knowledge and offering advice on the sustainable management and use of marine and coastal areas. IMARES is: An independent, leading scientific research institute. P.O. Box 68 P.O. Box 77 P.O. Box 57 P.O. Box 167 1970 AB IJmuiden 4400 AB Yerseke 1780 AB Den Helder 1790 AD Den Burg Texel Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Fax: +31 (0)317 48 73 26 Fax: +31 (0)317 48 73 59 Fax: +31 (0)223 63 06 87 Fax: +31 (0)317 48 73 62 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] www.imares.wur.nl www.imares.wur.nl www.imares.wur.nl www.imares.wur.nl © 2013 IMARES Wageningen UR IMARES, institute of Stichting DLO The Management of IMARES is not responsible for resulting is registered in the Dutch trade damage, as well as for damage resulting from the application of record nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Tortugas Ecological Reserve
    Strategy for Stewardship Tortugas Ecological Reserve U.S. Department of Commerce DraftSupplemental National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Environmental National Ocean Service ImpactStatement/ Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management DraftSupplemental Marine Sanctuaries Division ManagementPlan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS), working in cooperation with the State of Florida, the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, and the National Marine Fisheries Service, proposes to establish a 151 square nautical mile “no- take” ecological reserve to protect the critical coral reef ecosystem of the Tortugas, a remote area in the western part of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. The reserve would consist of two sections, Tortugas North and Tortugas South, and would require an expansion of Sanctuary boundaries to protect important coral reef resources in the areas of Sherwood Forest and Riley’s Hump. An ecological reserve in the Tortugas will preserve the richness of species and health of fish stocks in the Tortugas and throughout the Florida Keys, helping to ensure the stability of commercial and recreational fisheries. The reserve will protect important spawning areas for snapper and grouper, as well as valuable deepwater habitat for other commercial species. Restrictions on vessel discharge and anchoring will protect water quality and habitat complexity. The proposed reserve’s geographical isolation will help scientists distinguish between natural and human-caused changes to the coral reef environment. Protecting Ocean Wilderness Creating an ecological reserve in the Tortugas will protect some of the most productive and unique marine resources of the Sanctuary. Because of its remote location 70 miles west of Key West and more than 140 miles from mainland Florida, the Tortugas region has the best water quality in the Sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • CNIDARIA Corals, Medusae, Hydroids, Myxozoans
    FOUR Phylum CNIDARIA corals, medusae, hydroids, myxozoans STEPHEN D. CAIRNS, LISA-ANN GERSHWIN, FRED J. BROOK, PHILIP PUGH, ELLIOT W. Dawson, OscaR OcaÑA V., WILLEM VERvooRT, GARY WILLIAMS, JEANETTE E. Watson, DENNIS M. OPREsko, PETER SCHUCHERT, P. MICHAEL HINE, DENNIS P. GORDON, HAMISH J. CAMPBELL, ANTHONY J. WRIGHT, JUAN A. SÁNCHEZ, DAPHNE G. FAUTIN his ancient phylum of mostly marine organisms is best known for its contribution to geomorphological features, forming thousands of square Tkilometres of coral reefs in warm tropical waters. Their fossil remains contribute to some limestones. Cnidarians are also significant components of the plankton, where large medusae – popularly called jellyfish – and colonial forms like Portuguese man-of-war and stringy siphonophores prey on other organisms including small fish. Some of these species are justly feared by humans for their stings, which in some cases can be fatal. Certainly, most New Zealanders will have encountered cnidarians when rambling along beaches and fossicking in rock pools where sea anemones and diminutive bushy hydroids abound. In New Zealand’s fiords and in deeper water on seamounts, black corals and branching gorgonians can form veritable trees five metres high or more. In contrast, inland inhabitants of continental landmasses who have never, or rarely, seen an ocean or visited a seashore can hardly be impressed with the Cnidaria as a phylum – freshwater cnidarians are relatively few, restricted to tiny hydras, the branching hydroid Cordylophora, and rare medusae. Worldwide, there are about 10,000 described species, with perhaps half as many again undescribed. All cnidarians have nettle cells known as nematocysts (or cnidae – from the Greek, knide, a nettle), extraordinarily complex structures that are effectively invaginated coiled tubes within a cell.
    [Show full text]
  • The Recent Solitary Mussid Scleractinian Corals
    THE RECENT SOLITARY MUSSID SCLERACTINIAN CORALS by JOHN W. WELLS Cornell University, Ithaca, New York INTRODUCTION In 1937 the writer, following Matthai (1928, p. 209), placed the solitary mussid genera Cynarina, Homophyllia, Rhodocyathus, Protolobophyllia, Sclerophyllia, Scolymia (Lithophyllia — placed in Mussa by Verrill in 1902, p. 130, and suspected of being only the young of colonial mussids by Pour- tales in 1871, p. 70) as subjective synonyms of the various colonial genera such as Lobophyllia, Syrnphyllia, and Mussa, on the assumption that these supposed solitary forms were based on early monostomatous (monocentric) stages of colonial forms. The late T. W. Vaughan and the writer later (1943, p. 194) adopted the same treatment. Wells followed much the same line in 1956 (p. 417-418), except that Homophyllia was once more recognized as a distinct genus. Grave difficulties have arisen in absorbing the remaining genera in the colonial forms, and evidence has accumulated that several of these should be recognized as valid genera. The present paper, stimulated particularly by the study of a number of solitary mussids from New Caledonia sent by Dr. R. Catala of Noumea, to whom the writer expresses his appreciation not only for the specimens but also for permission to use certain photographs taken by Dr. Catala, is an attempt to rectify some of these errors of judgment. The position now is that the names Cynarina, Rhodocyathus, Sclerophyllia, and Protolobophyllia all pertain to a single genus (Cynarina), that Acantho- phyllia and Homophyllia are distinct, and that Scolymia (Lithophyllia), a West Indian form, and Parascolymia n. gen., a Pacific form, are indis• tinguishable from each other on the basis of skeletal structure, but differ in mode of asexual budding.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographic Identification Guide to Some Common Marine Invertebrates of Bocas Del Toro, Panama
    Caribbean Journal of Science, Vol. 41, No. 3, 638-707, 2005 Copyright 2005 College of Arts and Sciences University of Puerto Rico, Mayagu¨ez Photographic Identification Guide to Some Common Marine Invertebrates of Bocas Del Toro, Panama R. COLLIN1,M.C.DÍAZ2,3,J.NORENBURG3,R.M.ROCHA4,J.A.SÁNCHEZ5,A.SCHULZE6, M. SCHWARTZ3, AND A. VALDÉS7 1Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado Postal 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancon, Republic of Panama. 2Museo Marino de Margarita, Boulevard El Paseo, Boca del Rio, Peninsula de Macanao, Nueva Esparta, Venezuela. 3Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Invertebrate Zoology, Washington, DC 20560-0163, USA. 4Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Zoologia, CP 19020, 81.531-980, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. 5Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1E No 18A – 10, Bogotá, Colombia. 6Smithsonian Marine Station, 701 Seaway Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34949, USA. 7Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007, USA. This identification guide is the result of intensive sampling of shallow-water habitats in Bocas del Toro during 2003 and 2004. The guide is designed to aid in identification of a selection of common macroscopic marine invertebrates in the field and includes 95 species of sponges, 43 corals, 35 gorgonians, 16 nem- erteans, 12 sipunculeans, 19 opisthobranchs, 23 echinoderms, and 32 tunicates. Species are included here on the basis on local abundance and the availability of adequate photographs. Taxonomic coverage of some groups such as tunicates and sponges is greater than 70% of species reported from the area, while coverage for some other groups is significantly less and many microscopic phyla are not included.
    [Show full text]