DOCSLIB.ORG

Cover Page the Handle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cover Page the Handle Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/18623 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Helm, Alfred Charles van der Title: A token of individuality : Questiones libri porphirii by Thomas Manlevelt Issue Date: 2012-03-22 2011013 [Van der Helm] 00-Prelims-proef 4 [date 1201301431 : version 0] page -1 A Token of Individuality Questiones libri Porphirii by omas Manlevelt 2011013 [Van der Helm] 00-Prelims-proef 4 [date 1201301431 : version 0] page -2 Folio v of the manuscript of the Questiones libri Porphirii by omas Manlevelt. 2011013 [Van der Helm] 00-Prelims-proef 4 [date 1202011115 : version 0] page -3 A Token of Individuality Questiones libri Porphirii by omas Manlevelt A critical edition with introduction and indices Proefschri ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van Rector MagniÞcus prof. mr. P.F. van der Heijden, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties te verdedigen op donderdag 22 maart 2012 klokke 16.15 uur door Alfred Charles van der Helm geboren te ’s-Gravenhage in 1958 2011013 [Van der Helm] 00-Prelims-proef 4 [date 1201301431 : version 0] page -4 Promotor: prof. dr. E.P. Bos Overige commissieleden: dr. C. Dutilh Novaes prof. dr. F.A.J. de Haas dr. J.B.M. van Rijen dr. J. Spruyt prof. dr. B.G. Sundholm © 2012, A.C. van der Helm Printed by Koninklijke Wöhrmann, Zutphen Typesetting by TAT Zetwerk, Utrecht Cover design by A.C. van der Helm/Ivo Geradts On the cover: e front cover illustration is taken from folio 25va of the manuscript of the Questiones libri Porphirii by omas Manlevelt. e back cover illustration is from folio 17va of this same manuscript. 2011013 [Van der Helm] 00-Prelims-proef 4 [date 1201301431 : version 0] page -5 got und der werlt unnütz Uxori Þliabusque 2011013 [Van der Helm] 00-Prelims-proef 4 [date 1201301431 : version 0] page -6 2011013 [Van der Helm] 00-Prelims-proef 4 [date 1201301431 : version 0] page -7 Contents INTRODUCTION . Aboutthistext..................................................... 5 .. omas Manlevelt: on Þrst acquaintance . 5 .. Denial of substance . 7 .. Primacy of individuality. 12 . omas Manlevelt, life and works . 15 .. Bibliography . 15 .. Biography . 17 ... Biographical framework. 18 ... Career in Paris . 19 ... Bibliographical data from works and manuscripts . 21 ... Anglicus? . 22 ... e spelling of the name ‘Manlevelt’. 23 ... omas’s English background and the dating of his works................................................... 25 ... omas Manlevelt and Albert of Saxony . 27 . Why this text is to be ascribed to omas Manlevelt . 29 .. emanuscript ............................................... 29 .. Comparison with other texts . 33 .. Geographical circumstances . 34 .. e dating of the Questiones libri Porphirii . 37 .. e Franciscan context . 41 .. e theologian background . 43 . Historicalbackground ............................................ 47 .. Porphyry’s book, and what it is about. 47 ... e Organon ........................................... 47 ... e Categories ......................................... 48 ... e Isagoge ............................................. 50 ... e three questions . 52 ... Commentaries on the Isagoge ......................... 53 .. omas Manlevelt’s Ockhamism............................. 56 .. Ockhamism in Oxford and in Paris. 60 .. Parisian denials of substance . 62 2011013 [Van der Helm] 00-Prelims-proef 4 [date 1201301431 : version 0] page -8 viii contents .. eUniversityofParis ....................................... 65 .. eUniversityofOxford..................................... 69 ... Manlevelt and Bradwardine: De incipit et desinit ..... 70 ... Manlevelt and Bradwardine: Opus artis logicae ...... 73 . Form and contents of this text . 79 .. Questiones ..................................................... 79 ... e structuring of the Questiones ..................... 80 ... References given . 82 .. Why a commentary? . 83 .. e originality of omas Manlevelt’s approach . 86 .. omas Manlevelt’s theory of signs . 91 .. A brief summary of the contents of the questiones .......... 99 ... e individuum ........................................ 99 ... e accident . 105 ... e general structure of the text . 114 ... A comparison to other questiones-commentaries on the Isagoge .......................................... 114 ... omas Manlevelt’s commentary, questio by questio 122 . Descriptionofthemanuscriptused .............................. 139 . eeditorialprinciples............................................ 147 Bibliography ........................................................... 149 QUESTIONES LIBRI PORPHIRII Sigla .................................................................... 163 hQuestio i Utrum necesse sit aliquem scire quid genus sit et quid species etcetera ad cognitionem predicamentorum habendam 165 hQuestio i Utrum scire quid sit genus etcetera sit necesse ad divisionem faciendam . 171 hQuestio i Utrum noscere quid sit genus sit necessarium ad assignationem dinitionum . 175 hQuestio i Utrum universale sit hini intellectu ...................... 180 hQuestio i Utrumgenussitequivocum.............................. 190 hQuestio i Utrum genus sit cui supponitur species, et hoc est querere utrum illa dinitio generis sit bene data . 194 hQuestio i Utrum genus sit principium suarum specierum . 198 2011013 [Van der Helm] 00-Prelims-proef 4 [date 1201301431 : version 0] page -9 contents ix hQuestio i Utrum genus predicetur de pluribus dierentibus specie .............................................................. 203 hQuestio i Utrum omne genus predicatur in quid . 206 hQuestio i Utrum genus dierat ab individuo . 210 hQuestio i Utrum individuum predicetur de uno solo . 215 hQuestio i Utrum aliquod individuum sit terminus communis. 221 hQuestio i Utrum proprietas unius individui inveniatur in altero............................................................... 227 hQuestio i Utrum species sit res distincta a termino sive a signo 231 hQuestio i Utrum homo sit species animalis . 239 hQuestio i Utrum genus et species sint sibi invicem relativa . 243 hQuestio i Utrum in dinitione speciei sit necesse poni genus . 246 hQuestio i Utrum ista dinitio speciei ‘Species est que predicatur de pluribus numero dierentibus in eo quod quid sit’,sitbona......................................................... 252 hQuestio i Utrum omne quod est ante individua, sit species specialissima....................................................... 255 hQuestio i Utrum individuum sit nomen appellativum . 260 hQuestio i Utrum unum sit genus omnium; hoc est querere, utrum talia transcendentia aliquid, res, ens, sint genera . 264 hQuestio i Utrum tantum sint decem genera et non plura, nequepauciora .................................................... 270 hQuestio i Utrum genera generalissima sint principia rerum . 278 hQuestio i Utrum inÞnita relinquenda sint ab arte . 284 hQuestio i Utrum participatione speciei plures homines sunt unushomo......................................................... 291 hQuestio i Utrum inferiora predicentur de superioribus . 296 hQuestio i Utrum species sit pars generis . 301 hQuestio i Utrum aliquid dierat a seipso . 306 hQuestio i Utrum aliqua substantia dierat ab alia separabili accidente........................................................... 310 hQuestio i Utrum aliquid ab alio dierat inseparabili accidente . 314 hQuestio i Utrum dierentia speciÞca semper faceat aliquid ab alio dierre specie . 319 hQuestio i Utrum omne faciens per se dierre sit dierentia speciÞca............................................................ 325 hQuestio i Utrum dierentia per se suscipit magis et minus . 333 hQuestio i Utrum hec dierentia animatum sensibile sit constitutiva substantie animalis. 338 hQuestio i Utrum hec dierentia immortale sit constitutiva Dei . 343 2011013 [Van der Helm] 00-Prelims-proef 4 [date 1201301431 : version 0] page -10 x contents hQuestio i Utrum eadem dierentia sit discretiva generis et constitutivaspeciei ................................................ 348 hQuestio i Utrum dierentia speciÞca sit necessaria ad divisionemgeneris ................................................ 352 hQuestio i Utrum dierentia speciÞca sit necessaria ad dinitionem faciendam. 357 hQuestio i Utrum ista dinitio dierentie sit bene data: ‘dierentia est qua abundat species a genere’ . 364 hQuestio i Utrum aliqua alia dinitio dierentie convertitur cumdierentia .................................................... 368 hQuestio i Utrum proprium dicatur quadrupliciter . 374 hQuestio i Utrum aliquod accidens absit et assit preter subiecti corruptionem...................................................... 381 hQuestio i Utrum ex subiecto et accidente componatur aliquod perseunum ....................................................... 388 hQuestio i Utrum corvus possit subintelligi albus . 395 hQuestio i Utrum aliquod accidens sit genus substantiale . 403 Indexnominum ....................................................... 407 Index verborum notabilium . 409 Index exemplorum . 439 APPENDIX QUESTIONES SUPER PREDICAMENTA hQuestio i Utrum aliquis conceptus sit equivocus . 445 Samenvatting........................................................... 459 CurriculumVitae...................................................... 463 2011013 [Van der Helm] 01-Introduction-proef 4 [date 1201301431 : version 0] page 1 INTRODUCTION 2011013 [Van der Helm] 01-Introduction-proef 4 [date 1201301431 : version 0] page 2 2011013 [Van der Helm] 01-Introduction-proef 4 [date 1201301431 : version 0]
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Richard Kilburne, a Topographie Or Survey of The
    Richard Kilburne A topographie or survey of the county of Kent London 1659 <frontispiece> <i> <sig A> A TOPOGRAPHIE, OR SURVEY OF THE COUNTY OF KENT. With some Chronological, Histori= call, and other matters touching the same: And the several Parishes and Places therein. By Richard Kilburne of Hawk= herst, Esquire. Nascimur partim Patriæ. LONDON, Printed by Thomas Mabb for Henry Atkinson, and are to be sold at his Shop at Staple-Inn-gate in Holborne, 1659. <ii> <blank> <iii> TO THE NOBILITY, GEN= TRY and COMMONALTY OF KENT. Right Honourable, &c. You are now presented with my larger Survey of Kent (pro= mised in my Epistle to my late brief Survey of the same) wherein (among severall things) (I hope conducible to the service of that Coun= ty, you will finde mention of some memorable acts done, and offices of emi= <iv> nent trust borne, by severall of your Ancestors, other remarkeable matters touching them, and the Places of Habitation, and Interment of ma= ny of them. For the ready finding whereof, I have added an Alphabeticall Table at the end of this Tract. My Obligation of Gratitude to that County (wherein I have had a comfortable sub= sistence for above Thirty five years last past, and for some of them had the Honour to serve the same) pressed me to this Taske (which be= ing finished) If it (in any sort) prove servicea= ble thereunto, I have what I aimed at; My humble request is; That if herein any thing be found (either by omission or alteration) substantially or otherwise different from my a= foresaid former Survey, you would be pleased to be informed, that the same happened by reason of further or better information (tend= ing to more certaine truths) than formerly I had.
    [Show full text]
  • Texts Edited Authors and Titles | 1 Incipits | 14
    MEDIAEVAL STUDIES 1–82 (1939–2020) Texts Edited Authors and Titles | 1 Incipits | 14 AUTHORS AND TITLES Latin Abbo of Fleury, De duplici signorum ortu vel occasu (ed. Thomson). 50 (1988): 671–73 ———, De quinque circulis mundi (ed. Thomson). 50 (1988): 671–73 Abelard (see Peter Abelard) Abraham ben Meir ibn Ezra (?), Liber augmenti et diminutionis uocatus numeratio diuinationis [excerpts and variants from supplementary manuscripts] (ed. Hughes). 63 (2001): 107–41 [Accounts: see John de Stratton, John Gedeney, John Ludham, Robert de Wykford] Accursius (see Bonus Accursius Pisanus) Adam Burley, Forma est composicioni contingens et cetera (ed. Synan). 32 (1970): 60–90 Adhemar, Patristic collection in Paris, Arsenal 1117B (ed. Häring). 28 (1966): 336–46 Admonitio beati Gregorii [Paris, BnF lat. 1012] (ed. McCune) 75 (2013): 73–75 Admonitio Synodalis (ed. Amiet). 25 (1964): 12–82 Aegidius of Paris, Prose Prologue to the Gospels in Peter Riga’s Aurora (ed. Dinkova-Bruun). 73 (2011): 119–45 Al. (?), Additions to Peter Riga’s Aurora (ed. Dinkova-Bruun). 69 (2007): 1–57 Alan of Lille, De virtutibus et de vitiis et de donis Spiritus Sancti (ed. Lottin). 12 (1950): 20–56 Alberic of Monte Cassino, De rithmis (ed. Davis). 28 (1966): 198–227 ———, Three hymns in honor of St. Dominic (ed. Franklin). 55 (1993): 340–45 Albert of Morra (?), Forma dictandi (ed. Dalzell). 39 (1977): 440–65 Albertus Magnus, Problemata determinate XLIII (ed. Weisheipl). 22 (1960): 303–54 Alcuin, Confessio peccatorum pura (ed. Black). 65 (2003): 1–40 (cf. Old English “Eala þu ælmihtiga god”) ———, De laude psalmorum (ed. Black). 64 (2002): 1–60 Alexander Neckam, Commentum super Cantica excerpts [Laus Beatissime Virginis entries in Cambridge, University Library Gg.6.42] (McDonough).
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Hasted the History and Topographical Survey of the County
    Edward Hasted The history and topographical survey of the county of Kent, second edition, volume 5 Canterbury 1798 <i> THE HISTORY AND TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY OF THE COUNTY OF KENT. CONTAINING THE ANTIENT AND PRESENT STATE OF IT, CIVIL AND ECCLESIASTICAL; COLLECTED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS, AND OTHER AUTHORITIES: ILLUSTRATED WITH MAPS, VIEWS, ANTIQUITIES, &c. THE SECOND EDITION, IMPROVED, CORRECTED, AND CONTINUED TO THE PRESENT TIME. By EDWARD HASTED, Esq. F. R. S. and S. A. LATE OF CANTERBURY. Ex his omnibus, longe sunt humanissimi qui Cantium incolunt. Fortes creantur fortibus et bonis, Nec imbellem feroces progenerant. VOLUME V. CANTERBURY: PRINTED BY W. BRISTOW, ON THE PARADE. M.DCC.XCVIII. <ii> <blank> <iii> TO CHARLES SMALL PYBUS, Esq. ONE OF THE RIGHT HONORABLE THE LORDS COMMISSIONERS OF HIS MAJESTY’s TREASURY, AND MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT FOR THE TOWN AND PORT OF DOVER, &c. &c. SIR, YOUR partiality to a county, of which this is a History, has given me hopes, that the Dedication of this part of it to you will not be looked upon in an unacceptable light. The continued assistance and li= beral encouragement which you have favored me with in the progress of my larger History, and the many other essential marks of friendship which you iv have honored me with, cannot but flatter me with those hopes. You are besides, Sir, materially con= nected with the county, by the important station which you have so long held in representing the town and port of Dover, to the universal satisfaction of your constituents, who, confident of your attachment to the best of kings, and the happy constitution of this country, (an attachment which you have perse= vered in with unabated constancy) have continued their approbation of your conduct by repeatedly chusing you, with the same fervent zeal, in two suc= cessive parliaments.
    [Show full text]
  • Greintotagia
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society greintotagia SIDELIGHTS ON THE RECTORS AND PARISHIONERS OF RECULVER FROM THE REGISTER OF ARCHBISHOP WINCHELSEY. BY ROSE GRAHAM, 0.B.B., D.LITT., E.S.A., F.R.HIST.S. THE exceptional wealth of the benefice of Reculver was a disturbing factor in the history of the parish. The Archbishops of Canterbury had been in possession of the manor and the advowson of the church since the gift by King Edred in 949. The Saxon abbey had then ceased to exist, but the building continued in use as a parish church. In the late thirteenth century it was the mother church of four depen- dent chapels which had come into existence for the service of the inhabitants of the manor who numbered over a thousand. The chapels were at Hoath, St. Nicholas in Thanet, All Saints, no longer in existence, between St. Nicholas and Birchington, and Home. On several occasions the Crown and the Papacy claimed the presen- tation to Reculver for their nominees. lilrom 1296 until 1308 there were rival rectors, and violent seizures of tithes for four summers. In the space of twelve years three rectors were notable men, John de Langton, Edward I's chancellor, afterwards Bishop of Chichester (1305-1337), Simon of Faversham, who had served the University of Oxford as chancellor of the University, and Nicholas of Tingwick, Edward I's most trusted physician, a Balliol man and a benefactor of his University. Archbishop Winehelsey, the most outstanding Oxford scholar of his generation in church and state, made a fresh arrangement to promote the spiritual welfare of the parishioners on his manor of Reculver.
    [Show full text]
  • Categories and Universals in the Later Middle Ages
    CATEGORIES AND UNIVERSALS IN THE LATER MIDDLE AGES Alessandro D. Conti In the (later) Middle Ages categories and universals were closely linked topics. Categorial doctrine concerned (1) the existence, inner natures, and the mutual relationships of the basic, metaphysical items of the world (individual and universal substances, individual and universal accidents), and (2) the connections of such basic items to language. Late medieval theories of universals1 dealt with the problems of (1) real existence of universals (or common natures), both substantial and accidental ones, and (2) the relationship between them and the (perceptible or otherwise intelligible) individuals. Hence, in one way, later medieval theories of universals investigated more thoroughly some of the many related questions which categorial doctrines went into. This is not surprising, since (1) textually, medieval discussions on the problem of universals derived from a well-known passage of Porphyry ’s Isagoge, a work which was intended to be an introduction to Aristotle’s Categories, and (2) philosophically, the medieval problem of universals is one of the various aspects of the problem of meaning, which in its turn is one of the two main subjects of any later medieval categorial doctrine. In Isagoge 1,13–16 Porphyry raises his famous series of questions, about the ontological status of universals and their relation to individuals, which medieval philosophers faced up to in their commentaries on the Isagoge and treatises on universals: (1) whether genera and species exist in themselves or are nothing but mere concepts; (2) whether, if they have an extramental form of existence, they are corporeal or incorporeal; (3) and whether they exist apart from perceptible objects or in and by virtue of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Etk/Evk Namelist
    NAMELIST Note that in the online version a search for any variant form of a name (headword and/or alternate forms) must produce all etk.txt records containing any of the forms listed. A. F. H. V., O.P. Aali filius Achemet Aaron .alt; Aaros .alt; Arez .alt; Aram .alt; Aros philosophus Aaron cum Maria Abamarvan Abbo of Fleury .alt; Abbo Floriacensis .alt; Abbo de Fleury Abbot of Saint Mark Abdala ben Zeleman .alt; Abdullah ben Zeleman Abdalla .alt; Abdullah Abdalla ibn Ali Masuphi .alt; Abdullah ibn Ali Masuphi Abel Abgadinus Abicrasar Abiosus, John Baptista .alt; Abiosus, Johannes Baptista .alt; Abiosus, Joh. Ablaudius Babilonicus Ableta filius Zael Abraam .alt; Abraham Abraam Iudeus .alt; Abraam Iudeus Hispanus .alt; Abraham Iudeus Hispanus .alt; Abraam Judeus .alt; Abraham Iudaeus Hispanus .alt; Abraham Judaeus Abracham .alt; Abraham Abraham .alt; Abraam .alt; Abracham Abraham Additor Abraham Bendeur .alt; Abraham Ibendeut .alt; Abraham Isbendeuth Abraham de Seculo .alt; Abraham, dit de Seculo Abraham Hebraeus Abraham ibn Ezra .alt; Abraham Avenezra .alt; ibn-Ezra, Avraham .alt; Aben Eyzar ? .alt; Abraham ben Ezra .alt; Abraham Avenare Abraham Iudaeus Tortuosensis Abraham of Toledo Abu Jafar Ahmed ben Yusuf ibn Kummed Abuali .alt; Albualy Abubacer .alt; Ibn-Tufail, Muhammad Ibn-Abd-al-Malik .alt; Albubather .alt; Albubather Alkasan .alt; Abu Bakr Abubather Abulhazen Acbrhannus Accanamosali .alt; Ammar al-Mausili Accursius Parmensis .alt; Accursius de Parma Accursius Pistoriensis .alt; Accursius of Pistoia .alt; M. Accursium Pistoriensem
    [Show full text]
  • Research Guide to Non-Vatican Manuscripts on Microfilm at the Vatican Film Library
    Research Guide to Non-Vatican Manuscripts on Microfilm at the Vatican Film Library General Catalogue and Website Resources Catalogue général des manuscrits des bibliothèques publiques des départements. 7 vols. Paris, 1849–1885. Available at the VFL on microfilm roll 1470.2. Catalogue general des manuscripts des bibliothèques publiques de France. Paris. Available at the VFL on microfilm rolls 2173–2188. De Ricci, Seymour and W.H. Bond. Census of Medieval and Renaissance Manuscripts in the United States and Canada. 3 vols. New York: H.W. Wilson, 1935– 1940. Faye, C.U. and W.H. Bond. Supplement to the Census of Medieval and Renaissance Manuscripts in the United States and Canada. New York: The Bibliographic Society of America, 1962. Gneuss, Helmut. “A Preliminary List of Manuscripts Written or Owned in England up to 1100.” Anglo-Saxon England 9 (1981), 1–60. Gneuss, Helmut. Handlist of Anglo-Saxon Manuscripts: A List of Manuscripts and Manuscript Fragments Written or Owned in England up to 1100. Tempe, Ariz.: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2001. Ker, N.R. Catalogue of manuscripts containing Anglo-Saxon. Oxford: Clarendon, 1957. Reprinted 1990 with supplement originally published Anglo-Saxon England 5 (1977): 121–31. Kristeller, Paul Oskar. Iter Italicum. 6 vols. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1965–1992. Kristeller, Paul Oskar. Latin Manuscript Books before 1600: A List of the Published Catalogues and Unpublished Inventories of Extant Collections. Fourth revised and enlarged Edition. Munich: Monumenta Germaniae Historica, 1993. Manly, John M. and Edith Rickert. The Text of the Canterbury Tales, Studied on the Basis of All Known Manuscripts.
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories
    Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition A series of handbooks and reference works on the intellectual and religious life of Europe, 500–1700 VOLUME 10 Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories Edited by Lloyd A. Newton LEIDEN • BOSTON 2008 Cover illustration: Avicenna, Opera, Venice, 1508, folio 2 verso. Printed edition. Photograph by Megan Bickford. With kind permission of Ed Macierowski. This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Medieval commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories / edited by Lloyd A. Newton. p. cm. — (Brill’s companions to the Christian tradition, 1871–6377 ; v. 10) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-16752-0 (hardback : alk. paper) 1. Aristotle. Categoriae. 2. Categories (Philosophy). I. Newton, Lloyd A. II. Title. III. Series. B438.M43 2008 160—dc22 2008014809 ISSN 1871-6377 ISBN 978 90 04 16752 0 Copyright 2008 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishers, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. printed in the netherlands CONTENTS Preface ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Hasted the History and Topographical Survey of the County
    Edward Hasted The history and topographical survey of the county of Kent, second edition, volume 9 Canterbury 1800 <i> THE HISTORY AND TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY OF THE COUNTY OF KENT. CONTAINING THE ANTIENT AND PRESENT STATE OF IT, CIVIL AND ECCLESIASTICAL; COLLECTED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS, AND OTHER AUTHORITIES: ILLUSTRATED WITH MAPS, VIEWS, ANTIQUITIES, &c. THE SECOND EDITION, IMPROVED, CORRECTED, AND CONTINUED TO THE PRESENT TIME. By EDWARD HASTED, Esq F. R. S. and S. A. LATE OF CANTERBURY. Ex his omnibus, longe sunt humanissimi qui Cantium incolunt. Fortes creantur fortibus et bonis, Nec imbellem feroces progenerant. VOLUME IX. CANTERBURY PRINTED BY W. BRISTOW, ON THE PARADE. M.DCCC. <ii> <blank> <iii> TO WILLIAM BOTELER, ESQ. OF EASTRY. SIR, IT is with much pleasure that I take this opportu= nity of acknowledging my obligations to you, during the many years friendship which has subsisted between us, and still continues undiminished. This Volume, Sir, to which I have taken the liberty of prefixing your name, approaches to the history of that part of the county, in which I have been more particularly in= debted to you, for your unremitting assistance, without iv which I should, I fear, have been greatly deficient in my description of it. Your indefatigable searches into whatever is worthy of observation, in relation to Eastry and its neighbourhood, could alone furnish me with that abundant information requisite for this pur= pose; and to you, therefore, the public is in great measure indebted for whatever pleasure and informa= tion they may receive from the perusal of this part of my History, which from the long residence, as well as the respectable consequence of your family, for so many descents, in this part of the county, must afford you a more peculiar satisfaction; that it may meet with your approbation, is my sincere wish, who am with the greatest regard and esteem, Sir, Your most faithful and much obliged humble servant, EDWARD HASTED.
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Records Volume XV (1956) Provides a Clear Account of These Documents
    KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY KKEENNTT RREECCOORRDDSS SEARCHABLE Copyright © 201 2 Kent Archaeological Society Licensed for personal &/or academic use KENT FEET OF FINES – RICHARD II Kent Feet of Fines Richard II [1377-1399] Nos. 1-1170 by Duncan Harrington. 45 TNA: CP 25/1/108/ 208 nos. 1-25 (1) Westminster46 Trinity in 15 days 51 Edw. III; Morrow of St Martin 1 Richard II Q: John [?Dane or Denne]47 Robert his brother Edmund Godwynston clerk, Richard Tonge chaplain and Henry Hemyng. D: Thomas Holbem and Maud his wife. Moiety of 220 acres land 3 acres wood, 13s 4d rent and rent of [? one cock]48 and 18 hens in Eghethorne Wymelyngwelde Kyngeston Berham, Nonynton Asshe Staple, Berfreston, Wodnisbergh Godwynston and Adesham and quarter part of the manor of Eghethorne and moiety advowson of Eghethorne church. To hold (as to the moiety of tenements and advowson) to John, Robert, Edmund, Richard and the heirs of John. (As to the quarter manor held by William Halden for life with reversion to Thomas & Maud and the heirs of Maud) to John, Robert, Edmund, Richard and the heirs of John after the death of William. Warrant against the heirs of Maud. John, Robert, Edmund and Richard gave 100 marks. (2) Octave of Hilary 50 Edw. III; Octave St Martin 1 Richard II Q: Thomas Roger of Legh. D: John Dayle and Idonea his wife. 12 acres of land in Legh. Quitclaim from John and Idonea and the heirs of Idonea to Thomas and his heirs. Warrant against the heirs of Idonea. Thomas gave 10 marks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dominican Robert Kilwardby (Ca. 1215–1279) As Schoolman and Ecclesiastical Official
    Verbum et Ecclesia ISSN: (Online) 2074-7705, (Print) 1609-9982 Page 1 of 14 Original Research The Dominican Robert Kilwardby (ca. 1215–1279) as schoolman and ecclesiastical official Author: This article, by reworking the most recent specialist contributions, presents a fresh overview of 1 Johann Beukes the scholastic and ecclesiastical contributions of the Oxford Dominican Robert Kilwardby Affiliation: (ca. 1215–1279). After highlighting the current research problem of the ‘canon’ in Medieval 1Department of Philosophy, philosophy, the article turns to Kilwardby as a positive example of a ‘non-canonised’ thinker Faculty of Humanities, from the high Middle Ages – one who is thus thoroughly researched in a specialised or niche University of the Free State, compartment, but who remains mostly unacknowledged in mainstream or ‘canonised’ Bloemfontein, South Africa Medieval philosophy. The article thus reappraises Kilwardby intending to accentuate his Corresponding author: scholastic and ecclesiastical contributions beyond the confines of a particular niche. Kilwardby’s Johann Beukes, often provocative combination of Aristotelian natural philosophy and Augustinianism as a [email protected] schoolman, and his central yet problematic role in the Paris-Oxford condemnations of 1277 as Dates: an ecclesiastical official, are henceforth reappraised. Received: 06 Nov. 2019 Accepted: 19 Feb. 2020 Intradisciplinary/interdisciplinary implications: As a millennium-long discourse, Medieval Published: 08 June 2020 philosophy functions in a Venn diagrammatical relationship with Medieval history, Church history, patristics and philosophy of religion. Whenever ‘mainstream’ or ‘canonised’ Medieval How to cite this article: philosophy is impacted from the niche research, it may well have implications that these Beukes, J., 2020, ‘The Dominican Robert Kilwardby closely related disciplines could take note of.
    [Show full text]
  • Simon of Faversham Quaestiones Super Libro Posteriorum
    Simon of Faversham Quaestiones super libro Posteriorum Edited and translated by John Longeway 2016 First published April, 2016, at longeway.wordpress.com © John Longeway 2016 iii Preface I began the work for this volume when I was a graduate student, writing my dissertation on the material contained herein, at Cornell University, in 1975. I hope I have finally gotten it right! I have chosen to publish it myself in an electronic format for several cumulative reasons. I am now retired, and have no use for more peer-reviewed pieces to support applications for tenure and full professorship. I have found that most presses are willing to publish this sort of material only with financial assistance. And this way, I can do things the way I like, which is especially easier for me, given that I have never enjoyed any secretarial assistance for research from my workplace, quite justifiably, given the teaching priorities of the institution and its financial resources. As for distribution, I suspect that those who can use the book will find it, for the immediate future. I wish to thank most especially Professor Norman Kretzmann, who supervised my dissertation on Simon of Faversham at Cornell University, and provided both scholarly and material assistance to every phase of my work, and Professor Francesco del Punta of the University of Pisa, who introduced me both to Simon’s work and to the science of paleography. I also owe thanks to the Philosophy Department of the University of Wisconsin at Parkside, for hiring me to teach undergraduates, many of them the first in their families to attend college, despite an absurdly narrow specialization in medieval logic, and so providing the material subsistence without which this work could not have been completed.
    [Show full text]