PHLF News Publication

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PHLF News Publication Protecting the Places that Make Pittsburgh Home Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation Nonprofit Org. 1 Station Square, Suite 450 U. S. Postage Pittsburgh, PA 15219-1134 PAID www.phlf.org Pittsburgh, PA Address Service Requested Permit No. 598 PHLF News Published for the members of the Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation No. 160 April 2001 Landmarks Launches Rural In this issue: 4 Preservation Program Landmarks Announces Its Gift Annuity Program Farms in Allegheny County—some Lucille C. Tooke Donates vent non-agricultural development. with historic houses, barns, and scenic Any loss in market value incurred by 10 views—are rapidly disappearing. In Historic Farm Landmarks in the resale of the property their place is urban sprawl: malls, Through a charitable could be offset by the eventual proceeds The Lives of Two North Side tract housing, golf courses, and high- remainder unitrust of the CRUT. Landmarks ways. According to information from (CRUT), long-time On December 21, 2000, Landmarks the U. S. Department of Agriculture, member Lucille C. succeeded in buying the 64-acre Hidden only 116 full-time farms remained in Tooke has made it Valley Farm from the CRUT. Mrs. Tooke 12 Allegheny County in 1997. possible for Landmarks is enjoying her retirement in Chambers- Revisiting Thornburg to acquire its first farm burg, PA and her three daughters are property, the 64-acre Hidden Valley excited about having saved the family Farm on Old State Road in Pine homestead. Landmarks is now in the 19 Township. The property includes a process of selling the protected property. Variety is the Spice of Streets house of 1835 that was awarded a “I believe Landmarks was the answer Or, Be Careful of Single-Minded Planning Historic Landmark plaque in 1979. to my prayers,” says Mrs. Tooke. With this form of gift, a donor trans- “I hope Landmarks finds a buyer who fers cash, securities, or other property to loves the place as much as we do and 20 the CRUT and in return, avoids capital appreciates what was done to save it.” Membership Survey gains tax, receives a federal income tax Anyone interested in purchasing the deduction, and a percentage of the property can call M. J. Kelly Realty trust’s value each year. When the Corp. at (412) 271-5550. CRUT ends (in this case after 20 years), Landmarks also has discussed its Rural Preservation Program with the remaining principal passes to Program Meeting Planned Landmarks. “Great efforts were made Scenic America and with the American to structure the gift to meet Mrs. Tooke’s Landmarks will host a meeting this Farmland Trust and expects to income needs,” said Jack Miller, director spring at Hidden Valley Farm with develop additional programs with of gift planning for Landmarks, “and farmers and others interested in their organizations. farmland preservation in Allegheny to enable Mrs. Tooke’s daughters to you are interested in attending the County, in cooperation with the If receive any remaining income, if Mrs. meeting at Hidden Valley Farm, please Allegheny County Agriculture Land Tooke should predecease the term of call Jack Miller at (412) 471-5808, Preservation (ACALP) board and the CRUT.” ext. 538. Be sure that he has your In response to this preservation the Western Pennsylvania office of But what about preserving the farm? name, address, and phone number so concern, during a meeting on April the State Department of Economic The CRUT’s independent trustee must he can send you further details regard- 17, Landmarks’ Board of Trustees Development (PDED). The ACALP entertain bids to assure the highest price ing the meeting. approved the establishment of a Rural for any non-cash gifted asset. Mrs. is the local administrator of the Preservation Fund. Philip B. Hallen, Tooke took the additional precaution of Pennsylvania Agricultural Conservation Chairman of the Board, announced specifying in the CRUT that any organi- Easement Purchase Program that NOTE: The information contained in this article that Landmarks would be initiating zation willing to preserve the property supports the donation of easements to should not be construed as legal or tax advice. this program with income from the be given the right to match the highest responsible non-profit organizations. Persons considering any planned gifts should first Patricia Thauer Named Fund, estab- Arthur Ziegler, president of discuss them with their personal financial and/or lished in 1993 through a bequest from bid. That’s when Landmarks stepped to legal advisors. Gifts of real estate are reviewed by the plate. Landmarks, and a representative of a long-time member. In addition, PDED will inform farmers in Allegheny Landmarks on an individual basis and must meet Since Mrs. Tooke chose to make criteria set forth in our gift acceptance policy. Landmarks is allocating up to County about the State’s program, $500,000 from its Endowment Fund Landmarks the irrevocable beneficiary To learn more about creative ways you can leave about Landmarks’ planned giving a legacy to Landmarks and western Pennsylvania, income to the Rural Preservation of her CRUT, Landmarks decided to bid on the property. As the successful bidder, opportunities, and about the significance please contact our Web site at www.phlf.org or Fund and is seeking additional grants contact Jack Miller, director of gift planning at Landmarks could place a restrictive of saving historic farm structures and and contributions to bring the initial associated land. (412) 471-5808, ext. 538. funding package to $1 million. easement on the farm and land to pre- Route 8 corridor Gibsonia expansion Valencia and Rt. 228 In 1835 Lewis Ross and his wife Temperance built a farmhouse at the northern border of Allegheny County in what is now Gibsonia. Symmetrical on the front, L-shaped in plan, the masonry structure is well proportioned and solid. Hidden Valley Farm One-hundred sixty-five years after its construction, Hidden Valley Farm was threatened on all sides by development. In order to protect the family homestead, Lucille C. Tooke, a member of Landmarks for 36 years, established a charitable remainder unitrust. She donated the farm to the trust and named Landmarks as Pine Richland the irrevocable beneficiary. When the trust put the farm on the market, Landmarks High School purchased it and will preserve it with a protective easement. Treesdale Page 2 PHLF News • April 2001 Welcome New Members Recent Contributions & Gifts (As of March 5, 2001) There are many ways to give to Landmarks. Our members and friends make contributions in support of specific programs or in memory of a loved one. THANK YOU FOR JOINING! Your membership strengthens our They also give memberships as gifts or donate goods or services. We thank the organization—and brings you benefits, too: discounts at several Bed & following people and corporations for their contributions, as of March 5, 2001: Breakfasts; free walking tours and postcards; and invitations to special Corporate Matching Gifts events. For the most up-to-date news, check our Web site at www.phlf.org. • Chevron Corporation, for its gift in honor of Jack D. Burgess and Stephanie G. Sladek; • Merrill Lynch & Company Foundation, Inc., for its gift in honor of Meg and Robb Alarcon Richard Henry Mattern, Jr. Mr. & Mrs. Charles R. Altman John R. Matthews and family Edward C. Brown; and Lee Ann Antol Robin Mauser and family • PPG Industries Foundation, for its gift in honor of Paul W. Schaughency. Katie Bailie Constance E. Mayer Joe Balaban and family James McDonald Gift Memberships Kathleen M. O. Barkocy Deborah McCrogan Robert B. Bergdahl, Jr. Sharon and Mark McLaughlin • David and Janet Brashear, for their gift of membership for James Brugh; Robert Berger Kym Mosgeller and family • Carol and James Campbell, for their gift of membership for Randall Campbell; Paul R. Bernthal Phyllis Nowakowski Susanna Bjorkman and family Janet R. O’Connor • Elisa J. Cavalier, for her gift of membership for Mr. & Mrs. James E. Cavalier; Karen Boucher and family Ken Pasterak • Judith E. Donaldson, for her gift of membership for Mrs. John Stecklein; Mary Briscoe Jeanette Patsakis • K. Donna Hallen, for her gift of membership for Phyllis Nowalkowski; Alison Brooks Susan Peake Suzanne M. Broughton Debra Pisciuneri and • Martha Jordan, for her gift of membership for Nancy and Tom Spyke and family; family Jane Brown • Shirley and Tom Phillis, for their gift of membership for Mark T. Phillis; Craig Cahall and family Pittsburgh Candace Cain and Fred R. Nene Community • Mr. & Mrs. David W. Stevenson, for their gift of membership for Marge Stevenson; Reinvestment Calvary United Methodist Church • and Nan Weisenbaum and Reza Vali, for their gift of membership for Marilyn and June Cameron Group Pittsburgh Elementary Norman Weisenbaum. Harrison C. Chandler Gifted Center Cleft of the Rock Ministries John L. Price Morton & Greta Coleman and family In-Kind Contributions Rollyn E. Puterbaugh Marnie Conley Pamela and Emil Quatchak • We thank Norfolk Southern for railroad ties and hardware for the relocation Mallory Crawford Sandra Quinn and Stephen Thomas of the Tom Thumb locomotive. Jim Denova Indigo Raffel Rosemary DeRiso Leslie G. Reimer Lifetime Membership Mildred Devlin Phyllis Renda and family David Dix Tina Reuwsaat • Mr. & Mrs. Hugh W. Nevin, Jr., for their lifetime membership contribution. Carolyn L. Dorazio and family Grace Rock Robert D. Drennan Rachel Roebuck and family Memorial Gifts Dorothy Enright Denise Rousseau and Paul Goodman • Barbara W. Bonnett, Mr. & Mrs. Hugh W. Nevin, Jr., James H. Oliver, Virginia D. David and Cecelia Epperson and family Brian P. Rousseve First Trinity Lutheran Church St. Bede School Ramsburg, Margaret Pollard Rea, and Elizabeth Smith, for their gifts in memory of Arthur W. Fleming St. Elizabeth Ann Seton School Constance Hillman Oliver O’Neil; and Joe Fiorill St. George Orthodox Church • Nancy Gaskey Spear, for her gifts in memory of Mary M.
Recommended publications
  • The Arch and Colonnade of the Manhattan Bridge Approach and the Proposed Designation of the Related Landmark Site (Item No
    Landmarks Preservation Commission November 25, 1975, Number 3 LP-0899 THE ARCH AND COLONNAD E OF THE MANHATTAN BRIDGE APPROACH, Manhattan Bridge Plaza at Canal Street, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1912-15; architects Carr~re & Hastings. Landmark Site: Borough o£Manhattan Tax Map Block 290, Lot 1 in part consisting of the land on which the described improvement is situated. On September 23, 1975, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Arch and Colonnade of the Manhattan Bridge Approach and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No . 3). The hearing had been duly ad­ vertised in accordance with . the provisions of law. Two witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The Manhattan Bridge Approach, a monumental gateway to the bridge, occupies a gently sloping elliptical plaza bounded by Canal, Forsyth and Bayard Streets and the Bowery. Originally designed to accommodate the flow of traffic, it employed traditional forms of arch and colonnade in a monument­ al Beaux-Arts style gateway. The triumphal arch was modeled after the 17th-century Porte St. Denis in Paris and the colonnade was inspired by Bernini's monumental colonnade enframing St. Peter's Square in Rome. Carr~re &Hastings, whose designs for monumental civic architecture include the New York Public Library and Grand Army Plaza, in Manhattan, were the architects of the approaches to the Manhattan Bridge and designed both its Brooklyn and Manhattan approaches. The design of the Manhattan Bridge , the the third bridge to cross the East River, aroused a good deal of controversy.
    [Show full text]
  • THE Whiskey Insurrection of 1794 Long Has Been Regarded As One of the Decisive Events in Early American History
    THE WHISKEY INSURRECTION: A RE-EVALUATION By JACOB E. COOKE* THE Whiskey Insurrection of 1794 long has been regarded as one of the decisive events in early American history. But on the question of why it was significant there has been a century and a half of disagreement. Fortunately for the historian, how- ever, there have not been many interpretations; indeed, there have been only two. And, as anyone would guess, these have been the Federalist and the anti-Federalist, the Hamiltonian and the Jeffersonian. It is not the purpose of this paper to describe the fluctuating historical reputations of Jefferson and Hamilton; at one period of time (say, *the Jacksonian era) Jefferson was in the ascendancy; at another time (say, the post-Civil War period) Hamilton crowded Jefferson out of the American historical hall of fame. But for the past half-century and longer, the interpretation that our historians have given to the American past has been predi- cated on a Jeffersonian bias, and the Whiskey Insurrection is no exception. The generally accepted interpretation of the Whiskey Insur- rection reads something like this: In March, 1791, under the prodding of Alexander Hamilton and against the opposition of the Westerners and some Southerners, Congress levied an excise tax on whiskey. This measure was an integral part of Hamilton's financial plan, a plan which was designed to soak the farmer and to spare the rich. There was sporadic opposition to the excise in several parts of the country, but the seat of opposition was in the four western counties of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CORRESPONDENCE of ISAAC CRAIG DURING the WHISKEY REBELLION Edited by Kenneth A
    "SUCH DISORDERS CAN ONLY BE CURED BY COPIOUS BLEEDINGS": THE CORRESPONDENCE OF ISAAC CRAIG DURING THE WHISKEY REBELLION Edited by Kenneth A. White of the surprisingly underutilized sources on the early history Oneof Pittsburgh is the Craig Papers. Acase inpoint is Isaac Craig's correspondence during the Whiskey Rebellion. Although some of his letters from that period have been published, 1 most have not. This omission is particularly curious, because only a few eyewitness ac- counts of the insurrection exist and most ofthose were written from an Antifederalist viewpoint. These letters have a value beyond the narration of events, how- ever. One of the questions debated by historians is why the federal government resorted to force to put down the insurrection. Many have blamed Alexander Hamilton for the action, attributing it to his per- sonal approach to problems or to his desire to strengthen the central government. 2 These critics tend to overlook one fact : government officials make decisions based not only on their personal philosophy but also on the facts available to them. As a federal officer on the scene, Craig provided Washington and his cabinet with their informa- Kenneth White received his B.A. and M.A.degrees from Duquesne Uni- versity. While working on his master's degree he completed internships with the Adams Papers and the Institute of Early American History and Culture. Mr. White is presently working as a fieldarchivist for the Pennsylvania His- torical and Museum Commission's County Records Survey and Planning Study.— Editor 1 Portions of this correspondence have been published. For example, all or parts of six of these letters appeared in Harold C.
    [Show full text]
  • TITLE STANDARDS October 10, 2019 10305 ICLE: State Bar Series
    TITLE STANDARDS October 10, 2019 10305 ICLE: State Bar Series Thursday, October 10, 2019 TITLE STANDARDS 6 CLE Hours Including 1 Ethics Hour | 1 Professionalism Hour Copyright © 2019 by the Institute of Continuing Legal Education of the State Bar of Georgia. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of ICLE. The Institute of Continuing Legal Education’s publications are intended to provide current and accurate information on designated subject matter. They are off ered as an aid to practicing attorneys to help them maintain professional competence with the understanding that the publisher is not rendering legal, accounting, or other professional advice. Attorneys should not rely solely on ICLE publications. Attorneys should research original and current sources of authority and take any other measures that are necessary and appropriate to ensure that they are in compliance with the pertinent rules of professional conduct for their jurisdiction. ICLE gratefully acknowledges the eff orts of the faculty in the preparation of this publication and the presentation of information on their designated subjects at the seminar. The opinions expressed by the faculty in their papers and presentations are their own and do not necessarily refl ect the opinions of the Institute of Continuing Legal Education, its offi cers, or employees. The faculty is not engaged in rendering legal or other professional advice and this publication is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory - Nomination Form
    Form No. 10-300 , •\0/I tfW UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS NAME HISTORIC Emory University District AND/OR COMMON LOCATION STREET & NUMBER North Decatur Road _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Atlanta VICINITY OF 4th - Elliott H. Levitas STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Georgia ("IRQ CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE JS.DISTRICT —PUBLIC ^OCCUPIED _AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) JSLPRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS 2LEDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS .X-YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED —YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY —OTHER: OWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Emory University STREET & NUMBER North Decatur Road CITY. TOWN STATE Atlanta VICINITY OF Georgia LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS.ETC DeKalb County Courthouse STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE Decatur Georgia [1 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE None DATE FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY. TOWN STATE CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED —UNALTERED X.ORIGINALSITE KGOOD _RUINS X.ALTERED —MOVED DATE- _FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Emory University, founded in 1915 in Atlanta as an outgrowth of Emory College at Oxford, was designed in plan by Henry Hornbostel, who also designed the original buildings. Although several other architects including the New York library specialist, Edward Tilton and the Atlanta firm of Hentz-Adler-Shulze contributed in later years to the building designs of the Emory Campus, it is the Hornbostel Emory campus plan, dis- criminately set in the Olmsted-influenced Druid Hills area landscape that had and still has a predominating effect on the Emory campus environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gifted Child in the Intermediate Grades
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 1956 The iG fted Child in the Intermediate Grades Nelle Phillips Eastern Illinois State College Recommended Citation Phillips, Nelle, "The iG fted Child in the Intermediate Grades" (1956). Masters Theses. 4563. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/4563 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE GIFI'ED CHil..D IN THE INTERMEDIATE GRADES ; � ' A Substantial Paper written in Par tial Fulfillment ot the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Education at Eastern Illinois State College by Nelle Phillips -- July 1956 TABLE 0 F CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE :roRWORD • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ii I. THE GIFl'ED•-IN RETROSPECT • • • • • • • • • • • • • l II. DEFINITIONS OF GIFI'EDNESS AND METHODS OF SELECTION BY THE SCHOOL • • • • • • • • • • • • • I+ III. PROBLEMS 0 F THE G IFl'ED • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 12 IV. CURRICULUM ADJUSTMENTS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 21 Acceleration • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . 21 Segregation • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 27 " Enrichment • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 32 V. SOME RECOMMENDED SOLUTIONS IN THE LOCAL SITUATION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • )6 BIBLIOGRAPHY • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . .. 43 FOREWORD Education of the gi�ed is a major problem facing America today. The potent ialities of these children constitut e our country's greatest source of future leadership, yet they are the neglected children in our schools today. Much has been done, even within our own school unit to further the cause of the retarded , through good testing programs and the establishment of an Educable Mentally Handicapped Room. We know to what degree these children are retard ed but in most cases we can only estimat e the degree of acceleration of the gifted.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Organization Table of Contents
    History and Organization Table of Contents History and Organization Carnegie Mellon University History Carnegie Mellon Colleges, Branch Campuses, and Institute Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar Carnegie Mellon Silicon Valley Software Engineering Institute Research Centers and Institutes Accreditations by College and Department Carnegie Mellon University History Introduction The story of Carnegie Mellon University is unique and remarkable. After its founding in 1900 as the Carnegie Technical Schools, serving workers and young men and women of the Pittsburgh area, it became the degree-granting Carnegie Institute of Technology in 1912. “Carnegie Tech,” as it was known, merged with the Mellon Institute to become Carnegie Mellon University in 1967. Carnegie Mellon has since soared to national and international leadership in higher education—and it continues to be known for solving real-world problems, interdisciplinary collaboration, and innovation. The story of the university’s famous founder—Andrew Carnegie—is also remarkable. A self-described “working-boy” with an “intense longing” for books, Andrew Carnegie emigrated from Scotland with his family in 1848 and settled in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He became a self-educated entrepreneur, whose Carnegie Steel Company grew to be the world’s largest producer of steel by the end of the nineteenth century. On November 15, 1900, Andrew Carnegie formally announced: “For many years I have nursed the pleasing thought that I might be the fortunate giver of a Technical Institute to our City, fashioned upon the best models, for I know of no institution which Pittsburgh, as an industrial centre, so much needs.” He concluded with the words “My heart is in the work,” which would become the university’s official motto.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Membership Report Did George Washington Ever Sleep Here?
    A National Historic Landmark _____________________________________________________________________________________ 2017 Membership Report Did George Washington Ever Sleep Here? One of the most frequently asked questions we get is, “Did George Washington ever sleep here?” The short answer is ‘no,’ but the more complete answer is ‘almost.’ George Washington made his final two trips to Western PA in 1770 and 1784. In 1770, he lodged in the house of Mr. Semple, a public tavern about 300 yards from the old Fort Pitt. This location was later purchased in the mid-1780s by John Neville who turned it into his private residence. Therefore, George Washington slept in a house owned twelve years later by John Neville. John Neville George Washington The 1784 trip by Washington was spent visiting property he owned along Miller’s Run, about four miles from Woodville. He was accompanied by one of the Nevilles on this trip west, but lodged at the home of John Canon near present-day Canonsburg, PA The Still House Project Behind the main house stands a smaller gabled-roof building that is currently used as an office, meeting space, rental facility, and kitchen. This building is actually a 1949 replacement of a very similar structure. It has been built on the same footprint as the original building which was built about 1819. Over the years, it has served as a family schoolhouse, wash house, smokehouse, storage, and groundskeeper residence. Cowan estate inventories indicate that this structure was used as the farm’s still house. Here, grain from the farm would be distilled into spirits, a source of family income.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Pennsylvania Historical Magazine
    THE WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL MAGAZINE Volume 52 April 1969 Number 2 A HERITAGE OF DREAMS Some Aspects of the History of the Architecture and Planning of the University of Pittsburgh, 1787-1969 James D.Van Trump architectural history of any human institution is no incon- siderable part of that organization, whether it is a church or Thelibrary, bank or governmental agency; its building or buildings are its flesh by which in all phases of its development its essential image is presented to the world. Nowadays, as site and area planning come increasingly to the fore, the relation of groups of buildings to the land is receiving more attention from historians. Institutions of higher learning with their campuses and their interaction with larger social, architectural, and planning especially amenable to this patterns are' type of study. 1 An exhibition of the history of the architecture and planning of the University of Pittsburgh from 1787 to 1969 was held recently in Mr. Van Trump who is Vice-President and Director of Research of the Pittsburgh History & Landmarks Foundation and the editor of Chorette, the Pennsylvania Journal of Architecture, is well-known as an authority on the building history of Western Pennsylvania and as a frequent contributor to this magazine. He is currently working on a book dealing with the architecture of the Allegheny County Court House and Jail and he hopes to publish inbook form his researches into the architectural history of the University of Pitts- burgh.—Editor 1 Such studies are not exactly new as evidenced by the series of articles on American college campuses published in the Architectural Record from 1909-1912 by the well known architectural critic and journalist, Montgomery Schuyler (1843-1914).
    [Show full text]
  • The American Legion Monthly Is the Official Publication of the American Legion and the American Legion Auxiliary and Is Owned Exclusively
    QlfieMERI25 Cents CAN EGION OHonthlj/ Meredith Nicholson - Lorado Taft Arthur Somers Roche — Who wants to live on a poorly lighted street? Nobody who knows the advantages of modern lighting—the safety for drivers and pedestrians the protection against crime—the evidence of a desirable residential area. The service of General Electric's street-lighting To-day, no street need be dark, for good specialists are always at the command of communities street lighting costs as little as two dollars a year interested in better light- per capita; and for that two dollars there is a ing. In cooperation with your local power company, substantial increment in property value they will suggest appropri- ate installations, and give you the benefit of their It isn't a question whether you can afford long experience in the de- sign and operation of street- good street lighting, but— can you afford not lighting and electric traffic- control systems. to have it? GENERAL ELECTRIC S. F. ROTHAFEL— the famous Roxy—of Roxy and His Gang — builder of the world's finest theatre—known and loved by hundreds of thousands—not only for his splendid enter- tainments but for his work in bringing joy and sunshine into the lives of so many in hos- pitals and institutions. Never too busy to help—Roxy keeps himself in good physical con- dition by proper rest—on a Simmons Beautyrest Mattress and Ace Spring Anyone who has to take his rest in concentrated doses is mighty particular " about how he beds himself down doesn't know "Roxy"— his says springy wire coils and its soft mattress * ^ voice on the air has cheered millions layers is the result.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Z eeb Road. Ann Arbor.Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9505244 Young children’s acceptance of the gifted label Lai, Tsuei-Yuan, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1994 UMI 300 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Form
    VLR Accepted: 6/19/1996 NRHP Accepted: 5/16/1997 NPS Form 10-900-b 0MB No. 1024-0018 (June 1991) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Four Monumental Figurative Outdoor Sculptures donated by Paul Goodloe McIntire to the city of Charlottesville, Virginia, and to the University of Virginia. B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) Monumental Figurative Outdoor Sculpture by members of the National Sculpture Society donated by Paul Goodloe McIntire to the city of Charlottesville, Virginia, and the University of Virginia during the late City Beautiful movement fran 1919-1924. C. Form Prepared by name/title Betsy Gohdes-Baten organization date April 13, 1996 street & number 2737 Circle Drive telephone (919) 489-6368 city or town ___Du_rha_m ________ state _N_C _________ zip code --=-2--'77;_;:;0_z..5 _____ D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]