DOCSLIB.ORG

Milam.William.B..Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Milam.William.B..Pdf The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR WILLIAM B. MILAM Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: January 29, 2004 Copyright 2019 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born in Bisbee, Arizona, July 24, 1936 BA in History, Stanford University 1956-1959 MA in Economics, University of Michigan 1969-1970 Entered the Foreign Service 1962 Martinique, France—Consular Officer 1962-1964 Charles de Gaulle’s Visit Hurricane of 1963 The Murder of Composer Marc Blitzstein Monrovia, Liberia—Economic Officer 1965-1967 Attempting to Compile Trade Statistics Adventure to Timbuktu Washington, DC—Desk Officer 1967-1969 African North West Country Directorate Working on Mali and the Military Coup Studied at the University of Michigan Washington, DC—Desk Officer 1970-1973 The Office of Monetary Affairs Studying Floating Rates London, United Kingdom—Economic Officer 1973-1975 Inflation under the Labor Party The Yom Kippur War Washington, DC—Economic Officer 1975-1977 Fuels and Energy Office The 1970s Energy Crisis The Carter Administration 1 Washington, DC—Deputy Director/Director 1977-1983 Office of Monetary Affairs The Paris Club Problems between Governments and Banks Working with Brazil and the Paris Club Yaoundé, Cameroon—Deputy Chief of Mission 1983-1985 The Oil Fields of Cameroon Army Mutiny and Fighting Around Yaoundé Washington, DC—Deputy Assistant Secretary 1985-1990 International Finance and Development Fighting the Department of Defense on Microchip Manufacturing Dhaka, Bangladesh—Ambassador 1990-1993 History of Political Instability The Government in Dhaka and Awami League The Start of the Gulf War Operation Sea Angel Educating Women (Family Planning) Islam in Bangladesh Washington, DC—Special Negotiator for the Environment 1993-1995 Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) CSD Preparatory Meeting in Cartagena, Colombia Dealing with Desertification Final Meeting in Paris, France Monrovia, Liberia—Chief of Mission 1995-1998 Trouble in Liberia The Eruption of the First Liberian Civil War Protecting Non-American Refugees The Ceasefire Islamabad, Pakistan—Ambassador 1998-2001 Nuclear Proliferation of Pakistan Growing Concerns of the Taliban Conflict between India and Pakistan The Use of Information Technology in Diplomacy President Clinton’s Visit Retirement July, 2001 Post retirement activities 2 Washington, DC—Senior Policy Scholar 2003-2018 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars INTERVIEW Q: Today is 29 January 2004. This is an interview with Ambassador William B. Milam. It is being done on behalf of the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training. I am Charles Stuart Kennedy. You go by Bill don’t you? MILAM: I do indeed. Q: What does the name Milam mean? MILAM: Well I don’t know if it means anything. It is an English name. My brother who is the family historian believes that the Milams came from a village in England near Norfolk which is spelled Mileham. Q: Ok, well Bill, let’s start sort of at the beginning. Can you tell me when and where you were born and we will talk a little about your family. MILAM: I was born on July 24, 1936, in Bisbee, Arizona. Q: My, that is real mining country there. MILAM: Bisbee, as I understand it, used to have one of the biggest copper mines in the world. My dad was not a copper miner. My Mom and Dad were always there temporarily, even though they stayed 6 years or so. They were there pretty much since early in the depression because my dad had lost his job in Santa Barbara, California, and was out of work for a year. But when he was re-employed by the Western Union Company, he was sent to Bisbee. My Dad had moved around a lot before they were married, and didn’t mind moving to new places, whereas my mom was a southern Californian from a young age and didn’t like moving, but they had no choice. I was not their first child; a girl was born dead in 1934, and my Mother never really got over that the rest of her life. Q: Let’s talk about the family. Can you talk a bit about on your father’s side, what do you know about them and your grandfather, grandparents and father MILAM: Well my Father’s family came from Indiana. I still have relatives there, cousins, second cousins and so forth. My dad was actually born in Illinois, raised in Illinois, but his father had come from Indiana. My Dad spent almost every summer in Indiana, so was close to the Indiana family. He and his father didn’t get along very well. So when he was about 16 or 17, he left home for good and went first to Oklahoma to learn how to be a telegrapher. Then he went from there to California where he worked in the 20’s and up 3 until the time the depression came along. He met my mother in the late 1920s, and they were married in January 1930. So he was basically a Midwesterner transplanted to California. He did not go back to the Midwest until I was a teenager; thus I never knew his father. Q: On your mother’s side, where did your mother come from and what was her background? MILAM: My mother was born in Truckee, California, and grew up in Santa Barbara. Her father and mother had moved to California probably at the end the end of the 19th century. They came from Arkansas, but there was almost no connection left to Arkansas. I don’t think my mother had ever been there. Q: What was your mother’s maiden name? MILAM: Pierce. Q: Do you know anything about her parents? MILAM: Well I knew her father, he was still alive when I was young. He lived until he was seventy died in 1949 or 1950. I remember him as a very good grandfather, kind generous, loving to his grandchildren, of which he had 6. A fantastic story teller; he kept us entertained for hours with his stories of his youth and of his wanderings after he left Arkansas and before he found the promised land -- California. We loved him a lot. He was tall -- I must have inherited my stature from my mother’s side because both my maternal grandfather and his son, my mother’s brother, were quite tall. But that is about all I know about him. Q: And your mother, what kind of education did she have? MILAM: Oh she was a quiet shy person, but accomplished enough to finish high school and be told she could go to college if she wanted to. If she did, however, the family wouldn’t have enough money to send her brother to college. So she said she would let her brother go, and went to work and then met my dad. Q: What type of work did she do? MILAM: I don’t really know. She worked at the Western Union in Santa Barbara which is where my dad met her, so… Q: Do you recall Bisbee at all? MILAM: No. They left when I was about a year old. Q: Where did they go then? 4 MILAM: We went back to southern California which is where my mom always wanted to be. They went first to Ventura, which is between Los Angeles and Santa Barbara. My dad worked for the Western Union, an obviously mobile profession and I think we spent 4 years there before moving to Santa Ana which is south of Los Angeles in Orange County. We were there when I went to kindergarten. We were there when the war started in December 1941, and my dad tried to volunteer for the military. Now I had by then two brothers and another on the way. The army recruiter would not take his application but told him that if he wanted to contribute to the war effort, he should go to work for the railroads. They were going to be critical in the need to ship soldiers and equipment back and forth. As he had a skill which the railroads could use, telegraphy, he quit the Western Union, and went to work for the Southern Pacific Railroad. The first thing the SP did was transfer him to eastern Nevada. Q: Oh my God. MILAM: That is what his family said too. Q: I don’t think there is anything in eastern Nevada. MILAM: There are a lot of little small towns, and the SP runs through them. He went to Wells, Nevada. My pregnant mother and we 3 children moved to Santa Barbara, back to live with her father in Santa Barbara. I started the first grade in Santa Barbara. Q: Do you recall Santa Barbara at all? MILAM: Just barely. I was in kindergarten there. I have memories of my first day in kindergarten, of playing around with different friends, but that is about it. Q: Did you go to Knott’s Berry Farm? MILAM: I have a vague memory of going there It must have been when my father was still with us. But that is about all I remember. Q: That strikes me looking at the map, Las Vegas, Carson City, Reno are all on the western side. MILAM: Wells is on the Eastern side. It was a small town. I finished the first grade there. It was not the only place in Nevada we lived because my dad kept getting transferred. So we lived for a year in Reno -- the West side of the state. Then we lived for a couple of years in Carlin which is also in the East, though a little further west than Wells but still on the eastern side.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • US Military Intervention in the Post-Cold War
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Doctoral Dissertations University of Connecticut Graduate School 4-29-2014 U.S. Military Intervention in the Post-Cold War Era: A Case Study Analysis of Presidential Decision Making Dennis N. Ricci University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Ricci, Dennis N., "U.S. Military Intervention in the Post-Cold War Era: A Case Study Analysis of Presidential Decision Making" (2014). Doctoral Dissertations. 364. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/364 U.S. Military Intervention in the Post-Cold War Era: A Case-Study Analysis of Presidential Decision Making Dennis N. Ricci, Ph.D. University of Connecticut 2014 ABSTRACT The primary focus of this study is to explain presidential decision making, specifically whether to intervene militarily or not in a given circumstance in the Post-Cold War era. First, we define military intervention as the deployment of troops and weaponry in active military engagement (not peacekeeping). The cases in which we are interested involve the actual or intended use of force (“boots on the ground”), in other words, not drone attacks or missile strikes. Thus, we substantially reduce the number of potential cases by excluding several limited uses of force against Iraq, Sudan, and Afghanistan in the 1990s. Given the absence of a countervailing force or major power to serve as deterrent, such as the Soviet enemy in the Cold War period, there are potentially two types of military interventions: (1) humanitarian intervention designed to stop potential genocide and other atrocities and (2) the pre-emptive reaction to terrorism or other threats, such as under the Bush Doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Cold War U.S
    Continuity and Change in U.S.-Congo Relations: A critical analysis of post-Cold War U.S. foreign policy toward Zaire-Democratic Republic of Congo by Annelisa Lindsay B.A. May 2009, The George Washington University A Thesis submitted to The Faculty of The Elliott School of International Affairs of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts May 20, 2012 Thesis Directed by Paul D. Williams Associate Professor of International Affairs © Copyright 2012 by Annelisa Lindsay All rights reserved ii Abstract Continuity and Change in U.S.-Congo Relations: A critical analysis of post-Cold War U.S. foreign policy toward Zaire-Democratic Republic of Congo At the end of the Cold War, a shifting global political climate began to change U.S. foreign policy. U.S. policymakers soon realized that the United States no longer needed to compete with the Soviet Union for influence around the world. New policy priorities took the place of competition in proxy wars, which meant that Africa began to suffer from declining geostrategic importance. Zaire, which had shared a ―special relationship‖ with the United States during the Cold War, was not exempt from the growing malaise in U.S. Africa policy. This study seeks to analyze the continuity or change in U.S. policy toward Zaire, now Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), in the post-Cold War era by examining how different foreign policymaking institutions (White House, Congress, national security bureaucracy) directed the decision-making process to influence situations (routine, crisis, extended crisis) in U.S.-Congo relations from 1989 to 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in United States Diplomacy: How International Development and an Increasing Military Role Is Challenging the Relevance of U.S
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Undergraduate Honors Theses Honors College 2012 Changes in United States Diplomacy: How International Development and an Increasing Military Role is Challenging the Relevance of U.S. Ambassadors Jennifer M. Prillaman Follow this and additional works at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/honors_theses Part of the American Politics Commons, and the International Relations Commons Changes in United States Diplomacy: How International Development and an Increasing Military Role is Challenging the Relevance of U.S. Ambassadors BY Jennifer M. Prillaman UNDERGRADUATE THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF UNDERGRADUATE DEPARTMENTAL HONORS DEPARTMENT OF r?&�,<f�-'Jt.-a-J , ALONG WITH THE HONORS COLLEGE, EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CHARLESTON, ILLINOIS 2012 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THIS UNDERGRADUATE THESIS BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THE THESIS REQUIREMENT FOR UNDERGRADUATE DEPARTMENTAL HONORS DATE DATE t:iAT7E / Changes in United States Diplomacy: How International Development and an Increasing Military Role is Challenging the Relevance of U.S. Ambassadors Jennifer M. Prillaman Political Science Departmental Honors Thesis Spring 2012 Advisor: Dr. Ryan C. Hendrickson Introduction Diplomacy is inarguably the central act through which international relations of all states is conducted. American diplomacy has been a longstanding tradition, beginning with the first American Ambassador to France, Benjamin Franklin, who set the precedent forthe qualities of an ambassador and the roles of peacekeeping, negotiation, understanding, and representation. However, the role of a United States' diplomat has been forced to change within an increasingly globalized world with new state interdependency, technologies, and political situations. It has been stated "a real gap exists between the study of diplomacy and the study of most of the rest of international relations" (Sharp, 1998: 46).
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Aims and Modest Means: the Parallel Evolution of US and South African Foreign Policies Towards Africa in the 1990S
    London School of Economics and Political Science Grand Aims and Modest Means: The Parallel Evolution of US and South African Foreign Policies Towards Africa in the 1990s Brian Joseph Hesse Thesis submitted to the University of London in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations UMI Number: U615584 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615584 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 7 S F 7773 i ^ 0 e Xg;/C^ i 7 7 3 A- >5 17 ABSTRACT The United States is a global superpower at the heart of the international system; South Africa is a regional hegemon on a peripheral continent. Yet, despite the US and South Africa’s disparate positions in the international order, this thesis illustrates that the foreign policies of each towards Africa in the 1990s evolved in parallel fashion through four comparable periods, ultimately becoming strikingly similar near the end of the decade. A central feature of this parallel evolution, and eventual congruence, was the correlation between ‘grand aims’ and ‘modest means’.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories and Past Lessons: Understanding US Decisions of Armed Humanitarian Intervention and Nonintervention in the Post-Cold War
    STORIES AND PAST LESSONS: UNDERSTANDING U.S. DECISIONS OF ARMED HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION AND NONINTERVENTION IN THE POST-COLD WAR ERA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Shannon Peterson, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2003 Dissertation Committee: Associate Professor Donald A. Sylvan, Adviser Approved by Professor Emeritus Chadwick F. Alger ________________________ Adviser Assistant Professor Ted G. Hopf Political Science Department ABSTRACT What factors appear influential to U.S. decisions of armed humanitarian intervention and nonintervention? Utilizing the “story model” mode of problem representation first utilized by psychologists Pennington and Hastie (1986; 1988) and adapted to the domain of foreign policy by Sylvan and Charlick-Paley (2000), this research seeks to answer this question by exploring how top decision makers within the Bush and Clinton administrations collectively represented problems in Somalia, Rwanda and Bosnia in the early to mid-nineteen nineties. In particular, it explores whether decisions of armed humanitarian intervention and nonintervention appear linked to: (1) the invocation of historical analogies, (2) perceptions of threats and or opportunities to vital national interests, (3) perceived moral/legal imperatives, (4) pressure and interests related to domestic actors, such as the Congress, the public and the media, (5) institutional pressures and interests pertaining to U.S. membership in international organizations or alliances, such as NATO and or the United Nations, (6) the perceived relative ease and utility of intervention, and (7) vested military interests. An analysis of the collective elite discourse and evolving representations (or “stories”) of each crisis reveals, among other things, that decisions of armed humanitarian intervention and ii nonintervention appear strongly linked to perceived pressure and interests pertaining to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Prudence Bushnell Notebook # 3 Transcription.Docx
    © 2014 Prudence Bushnell - Reproduction prohibited without permission Transcription of Notebook #3 of Prudence Bushnell The National Security Archive Edited by Prudence Bushnell and Emily Willard Editorial Assistance by Claire Dailey & Clara Fisher © 2014 Prudence Bushnell - Reproduction Prohibited without Permission © 2014 Prudence Bushnell - Reproduction prohibited without permission © 2014 Prudence Bushnell - Reproduction prohibited without permission [Page 1 - front cover]1 Hang in There [sticker] NPR Day Pass [sticky note] Date: 5-4-1994 #3 4/6/94 to c. 5/15/94 [Page 2 - Inside front cover - sticky note paper] 24-27 or 28 –Bagosora – Bizimungu 4-30- Bizimungu 4-30 Kagame 5-1 Kagame 5- [Bizimungu] en congé3 1 Editor’s notes appear in brackets – […]; all other text is directly from the notebook. French language is in italics, and additional annotations by the editors, including French translation to English, are included in the footnotes. Best efforts have been made to replicate organization of the information on the pages of the notebook. 2 Dates Bushnell was told that the following people would be available for a phone call. 3 On leave/vacation 3* Prudence Bushnell often wrote in French in her notebooks when talking with French speakers. For example, with Rwandan military officials Théoneste Bagosora (Chef de cabinet of the minister of defense) and Augustin Bizimungu (promoted to Major General at the beginning of the conflict). © 2014 Prudence Bushnell - Reproduction prohibited without permission © 2014 Prudence Bushnell - Reproduction prohibited without permission [Page 3 – bottom page of notebook]4 -Rwanda5 Dead Missing Alive - PM Social Aff. PM designate - Agr – ConstitCrt – Communications –Pol. Party leader On plane Min of State for Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Render, Arlene
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR ARLENE RENDER Interviewed by: Stu Kennedy Initial interview date: February 10, 2006 Copyright 2017 ADST Q: Today is February 10th, 2006. This is an interview with Arlene Render. This is being done on behalf of the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training. I am Stuart Kennedy. And you go by Arlene, is that it? RENDER: That is correct. Q: Let’s start at the beginning. When and where were you born? RENDER: I was born in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1943. Q: Let’s talk a bit about your family. What can you tell me about them? Let’s start on your father’s side. RENDER: My father’s family migrated from Tennessee to the Cleveland area when he was very young. He is one of five sons and four daughters. A poor working class family, they valued education and considered graduating from high school a major step. All of his brothers and sisters graduated from high school and several served in the military. My father also wanted to serve in the military but was rejected due to a heart murmur. He compensated for his wish by keeping a scrapbook of World War II. One of his great joys was sharing his scrapbook with us. My mother’s family migrated to Cleveland from Georgia. Many previous generations also resided in Georgia. Q: What sort of jobs did your father do? RENDER: My father was a blue-collar worker. He worked in a steel mill for many years until the steel plant closed.
    [Show full text]