Milam.William.B..Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
US Military Intervention in the Post-Cold War
University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Doctoral Dissertations University of Connecticut Graduate School 4-29-2014 U.S. Military Intervention in the Post-Cold War Era: A Case Study Analysis of Presidential Decision Making Dennis N. Ricci University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Ricci, Dennis N., "U.S. Military Intervention in the Post-Cold War Era: A Case Study Analysis of Presidential Decision Making" (2014). Doctoral Dissertations. 364. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/364 U.S. Military Intervention in the Post-Cold War Era: A Case-Study Analysis of Presidential Decision Making Dennis N. Ricci, Ph.D. University of Connecticut 2014 ABSTRACT The primary focus of this study is to explain presidential decision making, specifically whether to intervene militarily or not in a given circumstance in the Post-Cold War era. First, we define military intervention as the deployment of troops and weaponry in active military engagement (not peacekeeping). The cases in which we are interested involve the actual or intended use of force (“boots on the ground”), in other words, not drone attacks or missile strikes. Thus, we substantially reduce the number of potential cases by excluding several limited uses of force against Iraq, Sudan, and Afghanistan in the 1990s. Given the absence of a countervailing force or major power to serve as deterrent, such as the Soviet enemy in the Cold War period, there are potentially two types of military interventions: (1) humanitarian intervention designed to stop potential genocide and other atrocities and (2) the pre-emptive reaction to terrorism or other threats, such as under the Bush Doctrine. -
Post-Cold War U.S
Continuity and Change in U.S.-Congo Relations: A critical analysis of post-Cold War U.S. foreign policy toward Zaire-Democratic Republic of Congo by Annelisa Lindsay B.A. May 2009, The George Washington University A Thesis submitted to The Faculty of The Elliott School of International Affairs of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts May 20, 2012 Thesis Directed by Paul D. Williams Associate Professor of International Affairs © Copyright 2012 by Annelisa Lindsay All rights reserved ii Abstract Continuity and Change in U.S.-Congo Relations: A critical analysis of post-Cold War U.S. foreign policy toward Zaire-Democratic Republic of Congo At the end of the Cold War, a shifting global political climate began to change U.S. foreign policy. U.S. policymakers soon realized that the United States no longer needed to compete with the Soviet Union for influence around the world. New policy priorities took the place of competition in proxy wars, which meant that Africa began to suffer from declining geostrategic importance. Zaire, which had shared a ―special relationship‖ with the United States during the Cold War, was not exempt from the growing malaise in U.S. Africa policy. This study seeks to analyze the continuity or change in U.S. policy toward Zaire, now Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), in the post-Cold War era by examining how different foreign policymaking institutions (White House, Congress, national security bureaucracy) directed the decision-making process to influence situations (routine, crisis, extended crisis) in U.S.-Congo relations from 1989 to 2003. -
Changes in United States Diplomacy: How International Development and an Increasing Military Role Is Challenging the Relevance of U.S
Eastern Illinois University The Keep Undergraduate Honors Theses Honors College 2012 Changes in United States Diplomacy: How International Development and an Increasing Military Role is Challenging the Relevance of U.S. Ambassadors Jennifer M. Prillaman Follow this and additional works at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/honors_theses Part of the American Politics Commons, and the International Relations Commons Changes in United States Diplomacy: How International Development and an Increasing Military Role is Challenging the Relevance of U.S. Ambassadors BY Jennifer M. Prillaman UNDERGRADUATE THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF UNDERGRADUATE DEPARTMENTAL HONORS DEPARTMENT OF r?&�,<f�-'Jt.-a-J , ALONG WITH THE HONORS COLLEGE, EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CHARLESTON, ILLINOIS 2012 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THIS UNDERGRADUATE THESIS BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THE THESIS REQUIREMENT FOR UNDERGRADUATE DEPARTMENTAL HONORS DATE DATE t:iAT7E / Changes in United States Diplomacy: How International Development and an Increasing Military Role is Challenging the Relevance of U.S. Ambassadors Jennifer M. Prillaman Political Science Departmental Honors Thesis Spring 2012 Advisor: Dr. Ryan C. Hendrickson Introduction Diplomacy is inarguably the central act through which international relations of all states is conducted. American diplomacy has been a longstanding tradition, beginning with the first American Ambassador to France, Benjamin Franklin, who set the precedent forthe qualities of an ambassador and the roles of peacekeeping, negotiation, understanding, and representation. However, the role of a United States' diplomat has been forced to change within an increasingly globalized world with new state interdependency, technologies, and political situations. It has been stated "a real gap exists between the study of diplomacy and the study of most of the rest of international relations" (Sharp, 1998: 46). -
Grand Aims and Modest Means: the Parallel Evolution of US and South African Foreign Policies Towards Africa in the 1990S
London School of Economics and Political Science Grand Aims and Modest Means: The Parallel Evolution of US and South African Foreign Policies Towards Africa in the 1990s Brian Joseph Hesse Thesis submitted to the University of London in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations UMI Number: U615584 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615584 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 7 S F 7773 i ^ 0 e Xg;/C^ i 7 7 3 A- >5 17 ABSTRACT The United States is a global superpower at the heart of the international system; South Africa is a regional hegemon on a peripheral continent. Yet, despite the US and South Africa’s disparate positions in the international order, this thesis illustrates that the foreign policies of each towards Africa in the 1990s evolved in parallel fashion through four comparable periods, ultimately becoming strikingly similar near the end of the decade. A central feature of this parallel evolution, and eventual congruence, was the correlation between ‘grand aims’ and ‘modest means’. -
Stories and Past Lessons: Understanding US Decisions of Armed Humanitarian Intervention and Nonintervention in the Post-Cold War
STORIES AND PAST LESSONS: UNDERSTANDING U.S. DECISIONS OF ARMED HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION AND NONINTERVENTION IN THE POST-COLD WAR ERA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Shannon Peterson, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2003 Dissertation Committee: Associate Professor Donald A. Sylvan, Adviser Approved by Professor Emeritus Chadwick F. Alger ________________________ Adviser Assistant Professor Ted G. Hopf Political Science Department ABSTRACT What factors appear influential to U.S. decisions of armed humanitarian intervention and nonintervention? Utilizing the “story model” mode of problem representation first utilized by psychologists Pennington and Hastie (1986; 1988) and adapted to the domain of foreign policy by Sylvan and Charlick-Paley (2000), this research seeks to answer this question by exploring how top decision makers within the Bush and Clinton administrations collectively represented problems in Somalia, Rwanda and Bosnia in the early to mid-nineteen nineties. In particular, it explores whether decisions of armed humanitarian intervention and nonintervention appear linked to: (1) the invocation of historical analogies, (2) perceptions of threats and or opportunities to vital national interests, (3) perceived moral/legal imperatives, (4) pressure and interests related to domestic actors, such as the Congress, the public and the media, (5) institutional pressures and interests pertaining to U.S. membership in international organizations or alliances, such as NATO and or the United Nations, (6) the perceived relative ease and utility of intervention, and (7) vested military interests. An analysis of the collective elite discourse and evolving representations (or “stories”) of each crisis reveals, among other things, that decisions of armed humanitarian intervention and ii nonintervention appear strongly linked to perceived pressure and interests pertaining to U.S. -
Prudence Bushnell Notebook # 3 Transcription.Docx
© 2014 Prudence Bushnell - Reproduction prohibited without permission Transcription of Notebook #3 of Prudence Bushnell The National Security Archive Edited by Prudence Bushnell and Emily Willard Editorial Assistance by Claire Dailey & Clara Fisher © 2014 Prudence Bushnell - Reproduction Prohibited without Permission © 2014 Prudence Bushnell - Reproduction prohibited without permission © 2014 Prudence Bushnell - Reproduction prohibited without permission [Page 1 - front cover]1 Hang in There [sticker] NPR Day Pass [sticky note] Date: 5-4-1994 #3 4/6/94 to c. 5/15/94 [Page 2 - Inside front cover - sticky note paper] 24-27 or 28 –Bagosora – Bizimungu 4-30- Bizimungu 4-30 Kagame 5-1 Kagame 5- [Bizimungu] en congé3 1 Editor’s notes appear in brackets – […]; all other text is directly from the notebook. French language is in italics, and additional annotations by the editors, including French translation to English, are included in the footnotes. Best efforts have been made to replicate organization of the information on the pages of the notebook. 2 Dates Bushnell was told that the following people would be available for a phone call. 3 On leave/vacation 3* Prudence Bushnell often wrote in French in her notebooks when talking with French speakers. For example, with Rwandan military officials Théoneste Bagosora (Chef de cabinet of the minister of defense) and Augustin Bizimungu (promoted to Major General at the beginning of the conflict). © 2014 Prudence Bushnell - Reproduction prohibited without permission © 2014 Prudence Bushnell - Reproduction prohibited without permission [Page 3 – bottom page of notebook]4 -Rwanda5 Dead Missing Alive - PM Social Aff. PM designate - Agr – ConstitCrt – Communications –Pol. Party leader On plane Min of State for Plan. -
Render, Arlene
The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR ARLENE RENDER Interviewed by: Stu Kennedy Initial interview date: February 10, 2006 Copyright 2017 ADST Q: Today is February 10th, 2006. This is an interview with Arlene Render. This is being done on behalf of the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training. I am Stuart Kennedy. And you go by Arlene, is that it? RENDER: That is correct. Q: Let’s start at the beginning. When and where were you born? RENDER: I was born in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1943. Q: Let’s talk a bit about your family. What can you tell me about them? Let’s start on your father’s side. RENDER: My father’s family migrated from Tennessee to the Cleveland area when he was very young. He is one of five sons and four daughters. A poor working class family, they valued education and considered graduating from high school a major step. All of his brothers and sisters graduated from high school and several served in the military. My father also wanted to serve in the military but was rejected due to a heart murmur. He compensated for his wish by keeping a scrapbook of World War II. One of his great joys was sharing his scrapbook with us. My mother’s family migrated to Cleveland from Georgia. Many previous generations also resided in Georgia. Q: What sort of jobs did your father do? RENDER: My father was a blue-collar worker. He worked in a steel mill for many years until the steel plant closed.