CREATING and USING METADATA SERVICES Increasing the Arcims Time-Out for Arcsde 110 Getting the Best Performance from the Database 110
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Early Explorers by Andrew J
The Early Explorers by Andrew J. LePage August 8, 1999 Among these programs were the next generation of Introduction Explorer satellites the ABMA was planning. In the chaos that swept the United States after the launching of the first Soviet Sputniks, a variety of The First New Explorers satellite programs was sponsored by the Department The first of the new series of larger Explorer satellites of Defense (DoD) to supplement (and in some cases was the 39.7 kilogram (87.5 pound) satellite NASA supplant) the country's flagging "official" satellite designated as S-1. Built by JPL, the spin stabilized program, Vanguard. One of the stronger programs S-1 consisted of a pair of fiberglass cones joined at was sponsored by the ABMA (Army Ballistic Missile their bases with a diameter and height of 76 Agency) with its engineering team lead by the centimeters each. The scientific payload consisted of German rocket expert, Wernher von Braun. Using instruments to study cosmic rays, solar X-ray and the Juno I launch vehicle, the ABMA team launched ultraviolet emissions, micrometeorites, as well as the America's first satellite, Explorer 1, which was built globe's heat balance. This was all powered by a bank by Caltech's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) (see of 15 nickel-cadmium batteries recharged by 3,000 Explorer: America's First Satellite in the February solar cells mounted on the satellite's exterior. This 1998 issue of SpaceViews). advanced payload was equipped with a timer to turn itself off after a year in orbit. While these first satellites returned a wealth of new data, they were limited by the tiny 11 kilogram (25 Explorer S-1 was launched from Cape Canaveral on pound) payload capability of the Juno I. -
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA Centro De Ciências Físicas E Matemáticas – CFM Fábio Rafael Herpich PLANO DE APOSEN
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA Centro de Ciências Físicas e Matemáticas – CFM Fábio Rafael Herpich PLANO DE APOSENTADORIA GALÁCTICA: Galáxias Early-type do Ultravioleta ao Infravermelho Florianópolis (SC) 2017 Fábio Rafael Herpich PLANO DE APOSENTADORIA GALÁCTICA: Galáxias Early-type do Ultravioleta ao Infravermelho∗ Trabalho realizado sob orientação do Prof. Dr. Roberto Cid Fernandes e co- orientação do Prof. Dr. Abílio Mateus apresentado ao Departamento de Física da UFSC em preenchimento aos requisitos da investidura ao título de Doutor em Física. Florianópolis (SC) 2017 ∗ Trabalho financiado pelas agências de fomento FAPESC e CAPES. Ficha de identificação da obra elaborada pelo autor, através do Programa de Geração Automática da Biblioteca Universitária da UFSC. Herpich, Fábio Rafael Plano de Aposentadoria Galáctica : Galáxias early-type do ultravioleta ao infravermelho / Fábio Rafael Herpich ; orientador, Roberto Cid Fernandes ; coorientador, Abílio Mateus. - Florianópolis, SC, 2017. 149 p. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências Físicas e Matemáticas. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Física. Inclui referências 1. Física. 2. galáxias. 3. astronomia extragaláctica. 4. galáxias early-type. 5. populações estelares. I. Cid Fernandes, Roberto. II. Mateus, Abílio. III. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Física. IV. Título. AGRADECIMENTOS • Aos professores Abílio Mateus, Roberto Cid Fernandes, Natalia Vale Asari e Grazyna Stasińska pelas orientações e parceria, sem -
Photographs Written Historical and Descriptive
CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY HAER FL-8-B BUILDING AE HAER FL-8-B (John F. Kennedy Space Center, Hanger AE) Cape Canaveral Brevard County Florida PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 100 Alabama St. NW Atlanta, GA 30303 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY BUILDING AE (Hangar AE) HAER NO. FL-8-B Location: Hangar Road, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Industrial Area, Brevard County, Florida. USGS Cape Canaveral, Florida, Quadrangle. Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: E 540610 N 3151547, Zone 17, NAD 1983. Date of Construction: 1959 Present Owner: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Present Use: Home to NASA’s Launch Services Program (LSP) and the Launch Vehicle Data Center (LVDC). The LVDC allows engineers to monitor telemetry data during unmanned rocket launches. Significance: Missile Assembly Building AE, commonly called Hangar AE, is nationally significant as the telemetry station for NASA KSC’s unmanned Expendable Launch Vehicle (ELV) program. Since 1961, the building has been the principal facility for monitoring telemetry communications data during ELV launches and until 1995 it processed scientifically significant ELV satellite payloads. Still in operation, Hangar AE is essential to the continuing mission and success of NASA’s unmanned rocket launch program at KSC. It is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A in the area of Space Exploration as Kennedy Space Center’s (KSC) original Mission Control Center for its program of unmanned launch missions and under Criterion C as a contributing resource in the CCAFS Industrial Area Historic District. -
Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology
ALMA MATER STUDIORUM UNIVERSITà DI BOLOGNA ASTRONOMY, ASTROPHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY Understanding the content and evolution of the Universe. The research of the University of Bologna covers a wide range of topics: • Stellar population studies based on space imaging in the UV (HST, GALEX, AstroSat), optical (HST), and infrared (Spitzer), and on ground-based spectroscopy • Physics and evolution of galaxies and AGNs based on space data across the entire electromagnetic spectrum • Cosmology and dark matter studies with gravitational lensing, galaxy clusters, large scale structure and neutral hydrogen • End-to-end simulations of imaging and spectroscopic data • Statistical analysis of large datasets • Numerical simulations for astrophysics and cosmology HIGHLIGHTS The University of Bologna participates in the following space missions and projects: ESA Euclid cosmological mission to address the key questions of dark energy and modified gravity (top-level responsibilities in management and science); AMS (Antimatter Magnetic Spectrometer): the study of antimatter and dark matter through a cosmic ray detector on the ISS (International Space Station); eROSITA, on-board of the “Spectrum-Roentgen-Gamma” satellite to survey the whole sky in the X-rays; ESA Athena X-ray space mission to address the cosmic evolution of black holes and large massive structures; Indian Space Telescope AstroSat; Space VLBI RadioAstron Project; ERC Advance Grant “COSMIC-LAB” on stellar physics and evolution; ERC Advance Grant “GLENCO” on gravitational lensing; ERC Starting -
Earth Explorer 9 Candidate Mission SKIM – Report for Mission Selection
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Earth Explorer 9 Candidate Mission SKIM – Report for Mission Selection Reference ESA-EOPSM-SKIM-RP-3550 Issue/Revision 1.1 Date of Issue 11/07/2019 Status Issued ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report is based on contributions from the SKIM Mission Advisory Group (MAG): Fabrice Ardhuin (LOPS Laboratory of Ocean Physics and remote Sensing, FR) Alessandro Battaglia (University of Leicester, UK) Peter Brandt (Geomar, DE) Fabrice Collard (OceanDataLab, FR) Geir Engen (NORCE Norwegian Research Center AS, NO) Paco Lopez-Dekker (Delft University of Technology, NL) Adrien Martin (National Oceanography Center, UK) Jamie Shutler (University of Exeter, UK) Detlef Stammer (University of Hamburg, DE) Michel Tsamados (University College London, UK) Erik van Sebille (Utrecht University, NL) Ernesto Rodriguez (Observer, NASA JPL, USA) The scientific content of the report was compiled by Craig Donlon (Scientific Coordinator) based on inputs derived from the MAG, supporting scientific studies and campaign activities, with contribution from Björn Rommen, Tania Casal and Gerhard Ressler. Additional contributions were made by Gérald Dibarboure, François Boy, Pierre Dubois, François Soulat, Clement Ubelmann, Bertrand Chapron, Lucile Gaultier, Frederic Nouguier, Jean-Marc Delouis, Goulven Monnier, Stéphane Méric, Charles Peureux, Mickael Accensi, and Tom Holden via supporting science studies and campaign work. The technical content of the report was compiled by Erik De Witte (Technical Coordinator) with contributions from Ana Piris Niño, Andrea Tromba, Björn Frommknecht, Björn Rommen, Elena Daganzo-Eusebio, Maarten van den Oever, Martin Suess (Payload Technical Coordinator) and Paolo Bensi, based on inputs derived from the industrial Phase A system and technical activities under the responsibility of the Future Missions and Instruments Division. -
CONFIRMIT HORIZONS V19 USER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
CONFIRMIT HORIZONS v19 USER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT .................................................................................... 2 1.1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-PREMISE SERVER INSTALLATIONS .................................................. 2 1.2 RECOMMENDED VS. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ............................................................ 2 2 CONFIRMIT HORIZONS MODULES .......................................................................... 2 2.1 CONFIRMIT AUTHORING .................................................................................. 3 2.2 CONFIRMIT EXPRESS ...................................................................................... 5 2.3 CONFIRMIT REPORTAL .................................................................................... 5 2.4 CONFIRMIT SMARTHUB ................................................................................... 7 2.5 CONFIRMIT DISCOVERY ANALYTICS ........................................................................ 8 2.6 CONFIRMIT INSTANT ANALYTICS ........................................................................... 8 2.7 CONFIRMIT ACTIVE DASHBOARDS ......................................................................... 8 2.8 CONFIRMIT ACTION MANAGEMENT ....................................................................... 9 2.9 CONFIRMIT SURVEY ENGINE (RESPONDENTS) ............................................................... 9 2.10 CONFIRMIT TRANSLATOR ................................................................................ -
<> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA
1 SATELITES ARTIFICIALES. Capítulo 5º Subcap. 10 <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA TIERRA. Esta es una relación cronológica de todos los lanzamientos de satélites artificiales de nuestro planeta, con independencia de su éxito o fracaso, tanto en el disparo como en órbita. Significa pues que muchos de ellos no han alcanzado el espacio y fueron destruidos. Se señala en primer lugar (a la izquierda) su nombre, seguido de la fecha del lanzamiento, el país al que pertenece el satélite (que puede ser otro distinto al que lo lanza) y el tipo de satélite; este último aspecto podría no corresponderse en exactitud dado que algunos son de finalidad múltiple. En los lanzamientos múltiples, cada satélite figura separado (salvo en los casos de fracaso, en que no llegan a separarse) pero naturalmente en la misma fecha y juntos. NO ESTÁN incluidos los llevados en vuelos tripulados, si bien se citan en el programa de satélites correspondiente y en el capítulo de “Cronología general de lanzamientos”. .SATÉLITE Fecha País Tipo SPUTNIK F1 15.05.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK F2 21.08.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 01 04.10.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 02 03.11.1957 URSS Científico VANGUARD-1A 06.12.1957 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 01 31.01.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1B 05.02.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 02 05.03.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1 17.03.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 03 26.03.1958 USA Científico SPUTNIK D1 27.04.1958 URSS Geodésico VANGUARD-2A -
Policy Center Requirements Operating Systems: the Following Operating Systems Are Recommended to Access Policy Center
Policy Center Requirements Operating Systems: The following operating systems are recommended to access Policy Center. Operating Systems Supported: Microsoft Windows Vista SP2 Microsoft Windows 7 Microsoft Windows 8 Microsoft Windows 10 * *There are some known issues with these Operating Systems. For more details, see ‘Known Issues’ section below. Internet Browsers: The following browsers are required to access Policy Center. If you currently use an older Microsoft browser than listed, or a non-Microsoft browser, you may receive other errors or experience other unknown issues. Browsers Supported: 32-bit Microsoft Internet Explorer 7+ 32-bit Microsoft Internet Explorer 8+ * 32-bit Microsoft Internet Explorer 9+ * 32-bit Microsoft Internet Explorer 10+ * 32-bit Microsoft Internet Explorer 11+ * *There are some known issues with these browsers. For more details, see ‘Known Issues’ section below. Additional Requirements:** Adobe Reader version 7 or higher (or a similar PDF viewer) Guidewire Document Assistant ActiveX plug-in **Required to view system generated documents. Microsoft Office 2007 or 2010 is suggested to view all other documents. You are responsible for uploading policy documents to Policy Center before and after submission of the application. Upload only what is needed. Most file types are acceptable. All documents will be retained according to TWIA’s document retention policy. Claims Center Requirements Internet Browsers: To provide the best user experience it is recommended to use browsers that support HTML5 & CSS3. Claims Center is a web application accessed through a web browser. There are tiered levels of support for web browsers: Tier 1 includes browsers used in testing environments. Tier 2 includes browsers that can present the core functionality and content, but may not be pixel perfect and may not to perform as well as Tier 1 browsers. -
Mad River Canoe Catalogue 2010-11
43 2010 / 2011 Product Catalogue VERSATILE CANOES 44 In much the same way that Rabbit felt confident on all manner of terrain, our Versatile Canoes will help you feel confident on both flat and white water adventures. The moderate rocker and durable material offer all around performance with minimal compromise: the best design for most water. If your paddling takes you from rivers to lakes, our Versatile Canoes are your best bet. VERSATILE CANOE EXPLORER SERIES Manufactured TripleTough for years of rugged, maintenance-free reliability, the Explorer T Ts also offer versatility and stability for tandem paddlers or the whole family. 5 1 RX SPECIFICATIONS: Length: 14’9”/ 449 cm Width (4” waterline): 33.75”/ 86 cm Width (Gunwale): 35.75”/ 91 cm All the benefits of the original in a compact design. You’ll find it to be quite nimble in tighter Depth (Center): 14.25”/ 36 cm Capacity: 850 lbs / 386 kg waters and a spacious, stable solo canoe as well. GUNWALE AVG WEIGHT STANDARD FEATURES AVAILABLE OPTIONS Material: Royalex IQ2 62 lbs/28.2 kg Vinyl IQ2 Gunwales, Web Seats, Yoke, IQ cupholders (2) Additional Thwart, Skid Plates, Shallow Vee Hull Centre Seat Moderate Rocker 14 TT Specifications Length: 14’6”/ 442 cm Width (4” waterline): 34”/ 86 cm Width (Gunwale): 36”/ 91 cm Well suited for confined waterways, the classic Shallow V-Hull also offers great tracking and Depth (Center): 14.5”/ 37 cm Capacity: 850 lbs / 386 kg comforting final stability. GUNWALE AVG WEIGHT STANDARD FEATURES AVAILABLE OPTIONS Material: Triple Tough T T IQ2 72 lbs/33 kg Vinyl IQ2 Gunwales, Web Seats, Yoke, IQ cupholders (2) Rotmolded Seats Shallow Vee Hull Moderate Rocker 45 WHITEWATER CANOES 46 Rabbit’s reputation as a trickster reminds us to incorporate an element of play in our days as well as our designs. -
IP CAMERAS IE Browser User's Manual
IP CAMERAS IDEA IE Browser User’s Manual for Windows XP/2003/Win7/Vista www.bettinivideo.com • www.bettiniservice.com Tel. +39 0289651000 • Fax. +39 0293182042 Directory 1. Preface...................................................................................................................................... - 4 - 2. Runtime environment configuration .................................................................................... - 4 - 2.1 Machine configuration requirements ............................................................................. - 4 - 2.2 Operating System Requirements .................................................................................... - 4 - 2.3 IE browser version requirements ................................................................................... - 4 - 2.4 Browser Configuration Requirements ............................................................................ - 4 - 3. Log in ....................................................................................................................................... - 6 - 4. The main interface ................................................................................................................... - 7 - 4.1 Plug-in installation instructions ...................................................................................... - 7 - 4.2 Live preview interface.................................................................................................... - 8 - 4.3 Alarm Output................................................................................................................. -
Index of Astronomia Nova
Index of Astronomia Nova Index of Astronomia Nova. M. Capderou, Handbook of Satellite Orbits: From Kepler to GPS, 883 DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03416-4, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Bibliography Books are classified in sections according to the main themes covered in this work, and arranged chronologically within each section. General Mechanics and Geodesy 1. H. Goldstein. Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, Mass., 1956 2. L. Landau & E. Lifchitz. Mechanics (Course of Theoretical Physics),Vol.1, Mir, Moscow, 1966, Butterworth–Heinemann 3rd edn., 1976 3. W.M. Kaula. Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Publ., Waltham, Mass., 1966 4. J.-J. Levallois. G´eod´esie g´en´erale, Vols. 1, 2, 3, Eyrolles, Paris, 1969, 1970 5. J.-J. Levallois & J. Kovalevsky. G´eod´esie g´en´erale,Vol.4:G´eod´esie spatiale, Eyrolles, Paris, 1970 6. G. Bomford. Geodesy, 4th edn., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980 7. J.-C. Husson, A. Cazenave, J.-F. Minster (Eds.). Internal Geophysics and Space, CNES/Cepadues-Editions, Toulouse, 1985 8. V.I. Arnold. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (60), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989 9. W. Torge. Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1991 10. G. Seeber. Satellite Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993 11. E.W. Grafarend, F.W. Krumm, V.S. Schwarze (Eds.). Geodesy: The Challenge of the 3rd Millennium, Springer, Berlin, 2003 12. H. Stephani. Relativity: An Introduction to Special and General Relativity,Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004 13. G. Schubert (Ed.). Treatise on Geodephysics,Vol.3:Geodesy, Elsevier, Oxford, 2007 14. D.D. McCarthy, P.K. -
Institute of Space Sciences Annual Report 2017
Institute of Space Sciences Annual Report 2017 An institute of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas(CSIC). Affiliated with the Institut d'Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC). Credit of the figure: Raining gas clouds on to a binary of two supermassive black holes. This figure comes from a suite of smoothed-particle-hydrodynamic simulations to study the formation and evolution of gaseous structures around a MBHB constantly perturbed by the incoherent infall of molecular clouds. We conclude that the formation of of extended circumbinary structures around the binary is challenging, to say the least (taken from arXiv:1801.06179, based on research done at the Institute in 2017). Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 History.....................................................5 1.2 Status......................................................5 2 Institute Management 7 2.1 Individually named positions.........................................7 2.2 Formal bodies..................................................7 2.3 Executive commissions and membership...................................7 2.4 Advisory commission for institutional relationships: membership.....................7 3 2017 in brief 9 4 Personnel 11 4.1 Administration................................................. 11 4.2 Faculty..................................................... 11 4.3 Staff Engineers/Technicians.......................................... 11 4.4 Ramon y Cajal Fellows............................................. 11 4.5 Postdocs and Postdoctoral Fellows.....................................