DOCSLIB.ORG

CREATING and USING METADATA SERVICES Increasing the Arcims Time-Out for Arcsde 110 Getting the Best Performance from the Database 110

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CREATING and USING METADATA SERVICES Increasing the Arcims Time-Out for Arcsde 110 Getting the Best Performance from the Database 110 Copyright © 2002, 2004 ESRI All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. The information contained in this document is the exclusive property of ESRI. This work is protected under United States copyright law and other international treaties and conventions. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, except as expressly permitted in writing by ESRI. All requests should be sent to Attention: Contracts Manager, ESRI, 380 New York Street, Redlands, CA 92373-8100, USA. The information contained in this document is subject to change without notice. U. S. GOVERNMENT RESTRICTED/LIMITED RIGHTS Any software, documentation, and/or data delivered hereunder is subject to the terms of the License Agreement. In no event shall the U.S. Government acquire greater than RESTRICTED/LIMITED RIGHTS. At a minimum, use, duplication, or disclosure by the U.S. Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in FAR §52.227-14 Alternates I, II, and III (JUN 1987); FAR §52.227-19 (JUN 1987) and/ or FAR §12.211/12.212 (Commercial Technical Data/Computer Software); and DFARS §252.227-7015 (NOV 1995) (Technical Data) and/or DFARS §227.7202 (Computer Software), as applicable. Contractor/Manufacturer is ESRI, 380 New York Street, Redlands, CA 92373-8100, USA. ESRI, ArcCatalog, ArcExplorer, ArcObjects, ArcGIS, ArcIMS, ArcMap, GIS by ESRI, ArcReader, Spatial Database Engine, SDE, ArcSDE, Geography Network, the ArcGIS logo, the Geography Network logo, www.esri.com, and www.geographynetwork.com are trademarks, registered trademarks, or service marks of ESRI in the United States, the European Community, or certain other jurisdictions. Microsoft and the Windows logo are registered trademarks and the Microsoft Internet Explorer logo is a trademark of Microsoft Corporation. Other companies and products mentioned herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective trademark owners. 1 Introduction 1 Contents What is a Metadata Service? 2 Putting it all together 3 Tips on learning about Metadata Services 4 2 Finding data in Metadata Explorer 7 Starting Metadata Explorer 8 Finding data using Metadata Explorer 9 Browsing metadata 12 Searching for data 13 Viewing the results of your search 14 Viewing metadata 15 Viewing a map of the data 16 Printing search results, metadata, and maps 17 3 Creating Metadata Services 19 Setting up your Metadata Service 20 Creating a Metadata Service 26 Creating usernames and passwords 28 Troubleshooting publishing problems 31 Metadata for ArcIMS services 32 Defining a service’s index 33 Manually indexing documents 37 Adding an administrative table to a service 39 4 Publishing metadata in ArcCatalog 41 Requirements for publishing metadata 42 Preparing metadata for publication 46 Publishing to a Metadata Service 53 Managing published documents 54 Finding data 58 iii 5 Connecting Z39.50 clients 61 Incorporating Z39.50 into your metadata system 62 What is Z39.50? 63 Getting started 64 Changing the service’s port 66 Setting the default Metadata Service 67 Setting log options 68 Protocols and restricting access to your metadata 71 12 Setting a communication protocol 74 Limiting access to your metadata 76 Customizing the connector 78 Controlling the format of responses 80 Available Z39.50 resources 81 A Configuring Metadata Explorer 83 Which ArcIMS services does Metadata Explorer need? 84 Starting the services 84 Configuring Metadata Explorer 85 Do you need a login? 86 Loading the gazetteer data 87 Customizing the gazetteer 89 An unattended Metadata Explorer session will expire. 94 Integrating Metadata Explorer into ArcExplorer 94 B ArcSDE considerations 95 Specifying ArcSDE connection information 96 Metadata Service database schema 96 Removing Metadata Service objects from the database 101 Configuring an Oracle database 102 Configuring a DB2 database 103 Configuring a SQL Server database 104 Configuring ArcSDE 105 iv CREATING AND USING METADATA SERVICES Increasing the ArcIMS time-out for ArcSDE 110 Getting the best performance from the database 110 C Harvesting documents 113 Collecting documents to create a community GIS portal 114 Exporting and importing documents between Metadata Services 116 Adding the OAI-PMH Connector to a Metadata Service 122 Harvesting documents using the OAI-PMH Harvester 125 D Publishing non-English metadata 131 What languages will a Metadata Service support? 132 Configuring your Metadata Service 132 Indexing and harvesting considerations 132 E What’s new with ArcIMS 9? 133 Changes for Metadata Services with ArcIMS 9 134 Migrating a Metadata Service to ArcIMS 9 135 Index 139 CONTENTS v Introduction 1 IN THIS CHAPTER Whether you realize it or not, you’ve seen metadata before. A wide variety of everyday items has metadata, with varying levels of detail. The nutritional • What is a Metadata Service? information on the label of a can of soup is metadata. A department store catalog is metadata. The price sticker on a new car is metadata. Anything that • Putting it all together describes something else can be thought of as metadata. • Tips on learning about Metadata Metadata is useful because it tells you about something without you actually Services having possession of that something. For example, you might browse through a store catalog before deciding to make a purchase. The metadata about the items in the catalog gives you valuable information, such as price, size, and material, to help you determine whether the item is right for you. Metadata for geographic data is often described as data about data. Metadata for geographic data typically describes the content, quality, type, collection date, and spatial location of the actual data. Looking at metadata can help you determine whether a particular dataset is appropriate for your use. In fact, it’s often easier to judge the suitability of the data from its metadata than by examining the actual data itself. This is because metadata is generally much smaller and easier to share than the actual data. And it’s the ability to share metadata—through an ArcIMS® Metadata Service—that makes it so valuable. Sharing metadata lets you see what geographic information system (GIS) resources, such as data, others have and also lets others see what you have. 1 What is a Metadata Service? geographic content, including live maps, downloadable data, and more advanced services. One component of the Geography A Metadata Service provides a forum for sharing metadata. If Network, the Geography Network Explorer, is a Metadata Service. you’re looking for data, you might search or browse a Metadata With the Geography Network Explorer, you can search for data by Service to find what you need. Similarly, if you have data that you geographic location; theme, such as environmental, business, or want to share with others, you can do so by publishing it to a health data; scale; date collected; and so on. Metadata Service where others can see it. Think of a Metadata Service as a geographic search engine that you use when you want to find data and other GIS resources. A Finding data Metadata Service works over the Internet, allowing anyone who Suppose you’re creating a map for a presentation and you need has access to the Web to use it. The Geography Network is just some basemap data to display behind the data you’ve collected one place you can go to look for data. Just as you can use ® about your study area. Many organizations collect geographic different Internet search engines such as Yahoo! , you can also information and build datasets. Some organizations freely search different Metadata Services hosted by other distribute their data while others may charge a small fee. The organizations. If you know the Web address of those Metadata question is, how do you find that data? Services, you can easily search their contents for geographic data. The first place you might look is ESRI’s Geography NetworkSM (www.geographynetwork.com). The Geography Network is a When you search for data on a Metadata Service, your search global network of geographic information users and providers. will yield a list of resources that match your search criteria. You Through the Geography Network, you can access many types of can view the complete metadata for each one to see if it’s what you’re looking for and can sometimes view an interactive map. Once you find a suitable dataset, you can download it or, in some instances, use it right from the Web. By examining metadata, you can see if the data is right for you. Sometimes The Geography Network Explorer helps you find the data you need. you can view an interactive map of the data. 2 CREATING AND USING METADATA SERVICES Sharing data Putting it all together If your organization is like most, you’ve invested a great deal of Once you’ve decided that you want to create your own Metadata time and money collecting the data from which you’ve built Service, where do you begin? With metadata, of course. The your geographic database. Often, the people who build databases fundamental components of a Metadata Service are the actual aren’t the same people who need to use them. So, how do you metadata documents that get published to the service. Most share your data with others who need it? Depending on who likely, if you’re the administrator of the Metadata Service, you’re needs access to your data, there are several approaches to not the person who will be authoring metadata—the departments utilizing the capabilities of a Metadata Service. or people who manage the data will be. You’re simply providing a Share your data on the Geography Network—The Geography way to share metadata. Network is a good place to start.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Early Explorers by Andrew J
    The Early Explorers by Andrew J. LePage August 8, 1999 Among these programs were the next generation of Introduction Explorer satellites the ABMA was planning. In the chaos that swept the United States after the launching of the first Soviet Sputniks, a variety of The First New Explorers satellite programs was sponsored by the Department The first of the new series of larger Explorer satellites of Defense (DoD) to supplement (and in some cases was the 39.7 kilogram (87.5 pound) satellite NASA supplant) the country's flagging "official" satellite designated as S-1. Built by JPL, the spin stabilized program, Vanguard. One of the stronger programs S-1 consisted of a pair of fiberglass cones joined at was sponsored by the ABMA (Army Ballistic Missile their bases with a diameter and height of 76 Agency) with its engineering team lead by the centimeters each. The scientific payload consisted of German rocket expert, Wernher von Braun. Using instruments to study cosmic rays, solar X-ray and the Juno I launch vehicle, the ABMA team launched ultraviolet emissions, micrometeorites, as well as the America's first satellite, Explorer 1, which was built globe's heat balance. This was all powered by a bank by Caltech's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) (see of 15 nickel-cadmium batteries recharged by 3,000 Explorer: America's First Satellite in the February solar cells mounted on the satellite's exterior. This 1998 issue of SpaceViews). advanced payload was equipped with a timer to turn itself off after a year in orbit. While these first satellites returned a wealth of new data, they were limited by the tiny 11 kilogram (25 Explorer S-1 was launched from Cape Canaveral on pound) payload capability of the Juno I.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA Centro De Ciências Físicas E Matemáticas – CFM Fábio Rafael Herpich PLANO DE APOSEN
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA Centro de Ciências Físicas e Matemáticas – CFM Fábio Rafael Herpich PLANO DE APOSENTADORIA GALÁCTICA: Galáxias Early-type do Ultravioleta ao Infravermelho Florianópolis (SC) 2017 Fábio Rafael Herpich PLANO DE APOSENTADORIA GALÁCTICA: Galáxias Early-type do Ultravioleta ao Infravermelho∗ Trabalho realizado sob orientação do Prof. Dr. Roberto Cid Fernandes e co- orientação do Prof. Dr. Abílio Mateus apresentado ao Departamento de Física da UFSC em preenchimento aos requisitos da investidura ao título de Doutor em Física. Florianópolis (SC) 2017 ∗ Trabalho financiado pelas agências de fomento FAPESC e CAPES. Ficha de identificação da obra elaborada pelo autor, através do Programa de Geração Automática da Biblioteca Universitária da UFSC. Herpich, Fábio Rafael Plano de Aposentadoria Galáctica : Galáxias early-type do ultravioleta ao infravermelho / Fábio Rafael Herpich ; orientador, Roberto Cid Fernandes ; coorientador, Abílio Mateus. - Florianópolis, SC, 2017. 149 p. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências Físicas e Matemáticas. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Física. Inclui referências 1. Física. 2. galáxias. 3. astronomia extragaláctica. 4. galáxias early-type. 5. populações estelares. I. Cid Fernandes, Roberto. II. Mateus, Abílio. III. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Física. IV. Título. AGRADECIMENTOS • Aos professores Abílio Mateus, Roberto Cid Fernandes, Natalia Vale Asari e Grazyna Stasińska pelas orientações e parceria, sem
    [Show full text]
  • Photographs Written Historical and Descriptive
    CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY HAER FL-8-B BUILDING AE HAER FL-8-B (John F. Kennedy Space Center, Hanger AE) Cape Canaveral Brevard County Florida PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 100 Alabama St. NW Atlanta, GA 30303 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY BUILDING AE (Hangar AE) HAER NO. FL-8-B Location: Hangar Road, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Industrial Area, Brevard County, Florida. USGS Cape Canaveral, Florida, Quadrangle. Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: E 540610 N 3151547, Zone 17, NAD 1983. Date of Construction: 1959 Present Owner: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Present Use: Home to NASA’s Launch Services Program (LSP) and the Launch Vehicle Data Center (LVDC). The LVDC allows engineers to monitor telemetry data during unmanned rocket launches. Significance: Missile Assembly Building AE, commonly called Hangar AE, is nationally significant as the telemetry station for NASA KSC’s unmanned Expendable Launch Vehicle (ELV) program. Since 1961, the building has been the principal facility for monitoring telemetry communications data during ELV launches and until 1995 it processed scientifically significant ELV satellite payloads. Still in operation, Hangar AE is essential to the continuing mission and success of NASA’s unmanned rocket launch program at KSC. It is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A in the area of Space Exploration as Kennedy Space Center’s (KSC) original Mission Control Center for its program of unmanned launch missions and under Criterion C as a contributing resource in the CCAFS Industrial Area Historic District.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology
    ALMA MATER STUDIORUM UNIVERSITà DI BOLOGNA ASTRONOMY, ASTROPHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY Understanding the content and evolution of the Universe. The research of the University of Bologna covers a wide range of topics: • Stellar population studies based on space imaging in the UV (HST, GALEX, AstroSat), optical (HST), and infrared (Spitzer), and on ground-based spectroscopy • Physics and evolution of galaxies and AGNs based on space data across the entire electromagnetic spectrum • Cosmology and dark matter studies with gravitational lensing, galaxy clusters, large scale structure and neutral hydrogen • End-to-end simulations of imaging and spectroscopic data • Statistical analysis of large datasets • Numerical simulations for astrophysics and cosmology HIGHLIGHTS The University of Bologna participates in the following space missions and projects: ESA Euclid cosmological mission to address the key questions of dark energy and modified gravity (top-level responsibilities in management and science); AMS (Antimatter Magnetic Spectrometer): the study of antimatter and dark matter through a cosmic ray detector on the ISS (International Space Station); eROSITA, on-board of the “Spectrum-Roentgen-Gamma” satellite to survey the whole sky in the X-rays; ESA Athena X-ray space mission to address the cosmic evolution of black holes and large massive structures; Indian Space Telescope AstroSat; Space VLBI RadioAstron Project; ERC Advance Grant “COSMIC-LAB” on stellar physics and evolution; ERC Advance Grant “GLENCO” on gravitational lensing; ERC Starting
    [Show full text]
  • Earth Explorer 9 Candidate Mission SKIM – Report for Mission Selection
    ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Earth Explorer 9 Candidate Mission SKIM – Report for Mission Selection Reference ESA-EOPSM-SKIM-RP-3550 Issue/Revision 1.1 Date of Issue 11/07/2019 Status Issued ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report is based on contributions from the SKIM Mission Advisory Group (MAG): Fabrice Ardhuin (LOPS Laboratory of Ocean Physics and remote Sensing, FR) Alessandro Battaglia (University of Leicester, UK) Peter Brandt (Geomar, DE) Fabrice Collard (OceanDataLab, FR) Geir Engen (NORCE Norwegian Research Center AS, NO) Paco Lopez-Dekker (Delft University of Technology, NL) Adrien Martin (National Oceanography Center, UK) Jamie Shutler (University of Exeter, UK) Detlef Stammer (University of Hamburg, DE) Michel Tsamados (University College London, UK) Erik van Sebille (Utrecht University, NL) Ernesto Rodriguez (Observer, NASA JPL, USA) The scientific content of the report was compiled by Craig Donlon (Scientific Coordinator) based on inputs derived from the MAG, supporting scientific studies and campaign activities, with contribution from Björn Rommen, Tania Casal and Gerhard Ressler. Additional contributions were made by Gérald Dibarboure, François Boy, Pierre Dubois, François Soulat, Clement Ubelmann, Bertrand Chapron, Lucile Gaultier, Frederic Nouguier, Jean-Marc Delouis, Goulven Monnier, Stéphane Méric, Charles Peureux, Mickael Accensi, and Tom Holden via supporting science studies and campaign work. The technical content of the report was compiled by Erik De Witte (Technical Coordinator) with contributions from Ana Piris Niño, Andrea Tromba, Björn Frommknecht, Björn Rommen, Elena Daganzo-Eusebio, Maarten van den Oever, Martin Suess (Payload Technical Coordinator) and Paolo Bensi, based on inputs derived from the industrial Phase A system and technical activities under the responsibility of the Future Missions and Instruments Division.
    [Show full text]
  • CONFIRMIT HORIZONS V19 USER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
    CONFIRMIT HORIZONS v19 USER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT .................................................................................... 2 1.1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-PREMISE SERVER INSTALLATIONS .................................................. 2 1.2 RECOMMENDED VS. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ............................................................ 2 2 CONFIRMIT HORIZONS MODULES .......................................................................... 2 2.1 CONFIRMIT AUTHORING .................................................................................. 3 2.2 CONFIRMIT EXPRESS ...................................................................................... 5 2.3 CONFIRMIT REPORTAL .................................................................................... 5 2.4 CONFIRMIT SMARTHUB ................................................................................... 7 2.5 CONFIRMIT DISCOVERY ANALYTICS ........................................................................ 8 2.6 CONFIRMIT INSTANT ANALYTICS ........................................................................... 8 2.7 CONFIRMIT ACTIVE DASHBOARDS ......................................................................... 8 2.8 CONFIRMIT ACTION MANAGEMENT ....................................................................... 9 2.9 CONFIRMIT SURVEY ENGINE (RESPONDENTS) ............................................................... 9 2.10 CONFIRMIT TRANSLATOR ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA
    1 SATELITES ARTIFICIALES. Capítulo 5º Subcap. 10 <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA TIERRA. Esta es una relación cronológica de todos los lanzamientos de satélites artificiales de nuestro planeta, con independencia de su éxito o fracaso, tanto en el disparo como en órbita. Significa pues que muchos de ellos no han alcanzado el espacio y fueron destruidos. Se señala en primer lugar (a la izquierda) su nombre, seguido de la fecha del lanzamiento, el país al que pertenece el satélite (que puede ser otro distinto al que lo lanza) y el tipo de satélite; este último aspecto podría no corresponderse en exactitud dado que algunos son de finalidad múltiple. En los lanzamientos múltiples, cada satélite figura separado (salvo en los casos de fracaso, en que no llegan a separarse) pero naturalmente en la misma fecha y juntos. NO ESTÁN incluidos los llevados en vuelos tripulados, si bien se citan en el programa de satélites correspondiente y en el capítulo de “Cronología general de lanzamientos”. .SATÉLITE Fecha País Tipo SPUTNIK F1 15.05.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK F2 21.08.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 01 04.10.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 02 03.11.1957 URSS Científico VANGUARD-1A 06.12.1957 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 01 31.01.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1B 05.02.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 02 05.03.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1 17.03.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 03 26.03.1958 USA Científico SPUTNIK D1 27.04.1958 URSS Geodésico VANGUARD-2A
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Center Requirements Operating Systems: the Following Operating Systems Are Recommended to Access Policy Center
    Policy Center Requirements Operating Systems: The following operating systems are recommended to access Policy Center. Operating Systems Supported: Microsoft Windows Vista SP2 Microsoft Windows 7 Microsoft Windows 8 Microsoft Windows 10 * *There are some known issues with these Operating Systems. For more details, see ‘Known Issues’ section below. Internet Browsers: The following browsers are required to access Policy Center. If you currently use an older Microsoft browser than listed, or a non-Microsoft browser, you may receive other errors or experience other unknown issues. Browsers Supported: 32-bit Microsoft Internet Explorer 7+ 32-bit Microsoft Internet Explorer 8+ * 32-bit Microsoft Internet Explorer 9+ * 32-bit Microsoft Internet Explorer 10+ * 32-bit Microsoft Internet Explorer 11+ * *There are some known issues with these browsers. For more details, see ‘Known Issues’ section below. Additional Requirements:** Adobe Reader version 7 or higher (or a similar PDF viewer) Guidewire Document Assistant ActiveX plug-in **Required to view system generated documents. Microsoft Office 2007 or 2010 is suggested to view all other documents. You are responsible for uploading policy documents to Policy Center before and after submission of the application. Upload only what is needed. Most file types are acceptable. All documents will be retained according to TWIA’s document retention policy. Claims Center Requirements Internet Browsers: To provide the best user experience it is recommended to use browsers that support HTML5 & CSS3. Claims Center is a web application accessed through a web browser. There are tiered levels of support for web browsers: Tier 1 includes browsers used in testing environments. Tier 2 includes browsers that can present the core functionality and content, but may not be pixel perfect and may not to perform as well as Tier 1 browsers.
    [Show full text]
  • Mad River Canoe Catalogue 2010-11
    43 2010 / 2011 Product Catalogue VERSATILE CANOES 44 In much the same way that Rabbit felt confident on all manner of terrain, our Versatile Canoes will help you feel confident on both flat and white water adventures. The moderate rocker and durable material offer all around performance with minimal compromise: the best design for most water. If your paddling takes you from rivers to lakes, our Versatile Canoes are your best bet. VERSATILE CANOE EXPLORER SERIES Manufactured TripleTough for years of rugged, maintenance-free reliability, the Explorer T Ts also offer versatility and stability for tandem paddlers or the whole family. 5 1 RX SPECIFICATIONS: Length: 14’9”/ 449 cm Width (4” waterline): 33.75”/ 86 cm Width (Gunwale): 35.75”/ 91 cm All the benefits of the original in a compact design. You’ll find it to be quite nimble in tighter Depth (Center): 14.25”/ 36 cm Capacity: 850 lbs / 386 kg waters and a spacious, stable solo canoe as well. GUNWALE AVG WEIGHT STANDARD FEATURES AVAILABLE OPTIONS Material: Royalex IQ2 62 lbs/28.2 kg Vinyl IQ2 Gunwales, Web Seats, Yoke, IQ cupholders (2) Additional Thwart, Skid Plates, Shallow Vee Hull Centre Seat Moderate Rocker 14 TT Specifications Length: 14’6”/ 442 cm Width (4” waterline): 34”/ 86 cm Width (Gunwale): 36”/ 91 cm Well suited for confined waterways, the classic Shallow V-Hull also offers great tracking and Depth (Center): 14.5”/ 37 cm Capacity: 850 lbs / 386 kg comforting final stability. GUNWALE AVG WEIGHT STANDARD FEATURES AVAILABLE OPTIONS Material: Triple Tough T T IQ2 72 lbs/33 kg Vinyl IQ2 Gunwales, Web Seats, Yoke, IQ cupholders (2) Rotmolded Seats Shallow Vee Hull Moderate Rocker 45 WHITEWATER CANOES 46 Rabbit’s reputation as a trickster reminds us to incorporate an element of play in our days as well as our designs.
    [Show full text]
  • IP CAMERAS IE Browser User's Manual
    IP CAMERAS IDEA IE Browser User’s Manual for Windows XP/2003/Win7/Vista www.bettinivideo.com • www.bettiniservice.com Tel. +39 0289651000 • Fax. +39 0293182042 Directory 1. Preface...................................................................................................................................... - 4 - 2. Runtime environment configuration .................................................................................... - 4 - 2.1 Machine configuration requirements ............................................................................. - 4 - 2.2 Operating System Requirements .................................................................................... - 4 - 2.3 IE browser version requirements ................................................................................... - 4 - 2.4 Browser Configuration Requirements ............................................................................ - 4 - 3. Log in ....................................................................................................................................... - 6 - 4. The main interface ................................................................................................................... - 7 - 4.1 Plug-in installation instructions ...................................................................................... - 7 - 4.2 Live preview interface.................................................................................................... - 8 - 4.3 Alarm Output.................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Astronomia Nova
    Index of Astronomia Nova Index of Astronomia Nova. M. Capderou, Handbook of Satellite Orbits: From Kepler to GPS, 883 DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03416-4, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Bibliography Books are classified in sections according to the main themes covered in this work, and arranged chronologically within each section. General Mechanics and Geodesy 1. H. Goldstein. Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, Mass., 1956 2. L. Landau & E. Lifchitz. Mechanics (Course of Theoretical Physics),Vol.1, Mir, Moscow, 1966, Butterworth–Heinemann 3rd edn., 1976 3. W.M. Kaula. Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Publ., Waltham, Mass., 1966 4. J.-J. Levallois. G´eod´esie g´en´erale, Vols. 1, 2, 3, Eyrolles, Paris, 1969, 1970 5. J.-J. Levallois & J. Kovalevsky. G´eod´esie g´en´erale,Vol.4:G´eod´esie spatiale, Eyrolles, Paris, 1970 6. G. Bomford. Geodesy, 4th edn., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980 7. J.-C. Husson, A. Cazenave, J.-F. Minster (Eds.). Internal Geophysics and Space, CNES/Cepadues-Editions, Toulouse, 1985 8. V.I. Arnold. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (60), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989 9. W. Torge. Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1991 10. G. Seeber. Satellite Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993 11. E.W. Grafarend, F.W. Krumm, V.S. Schwarze (Eds.). Geodesy: The Challenge of the 3rd Millennium, Springer, Berlin, 2003 12. H. Stephani. Relativity: An Introduction to Special and General Relativity,Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004 13. G. Schubert (Ed.). Treatise on Geodephysics,Vol.3:Geodesy, Elsevier, Oxford, 2007 14. D.D. McCarthy, P.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Institute of Space Sciences Annual Report 2017
    Institute of Space Sciences Annual Report 2017 An institute of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas(CSIC). Affiliated with the Institut d'Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC). Credit of the figure: Raining gas clouds on to a binary of two supermassive black holes. This figure comes from a suite of smoothed-particle-hydrodynamic simulations to study the formation and evolution of gaseous structures around a MBHB constantly perturbed by the incoherent infall of molecular clouds. We conclude that the formation of of extended circumbinary structures around the binary is challenging, to say the least (taken from arXiv:1801.06179, based on research done at the Institute in 2017). Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 History.....................................................5 1.2 Status......................................................5 2 Institute Management 7 2.1 Individually named positions.........................................7 2.2 Formal bodies..................................................7 2.3 Executive commissions and membership...................................7 2.4 Advisory commission for institutional relationships: membership.....................7 3 2017 in brief 9 4 Personnel 11 4.1 Administration................................................. 11 4.2 Faculty..................................................... 11 4.3 Staff Engineers/Technicians.......................................... 11 4.4 Ramon y Cajal Fellows............................................. 11 4.5 Postdocs and Postdoctoral Fellows.....................................
    [Show full text]