DOCSLIB.ORG

Politicians, Ministers and Parliamentarians Involved

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Politicians, Ministers and Parliamentarians Involved The 2G spectrum scam in India involved the issue of 1232 licenses by the ruling Congress-led UPA alliance[1] of the 2G spectrum to 85 companies[1] including many new telecom companies with little or no experience in the telecom sector at a price set in the year 2001. The scam involved allegations regarding the under pricing of the 2G spectrum by the Department of Telecommunications which resulted in a heavy loss to the exchequer, and the illegal manipulation of the spectrum allocation process to favour select companies The issue came to light after the auction of airwaves for 3G services which amounted to 677,190 crore (US$151.01 billion) to the exchequer.[2] A report submitted by the Comptroller and Auditor General based on the money collected from 3G licenses estimated that the loss to the exchequer due to under pricing of the 2G spectrum was 176,379 crore (US$39.33 billion).[3] The scam came to public notice when the Supreme Court of India took Subramaniam Swamy's complaints on record [With Case type:Writ Petition (Civil),Case No:10, Year:2011].[4]All the accused have been booked under sections 120(B) (criminal conspiracy), 468 (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 471 (using as genuine a forged document or electronic record), 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property) and 109 (abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment) of the Indian Penal Code.[5] Politicians, Ministers and Parliamentarians involved: Andimuthu Raja, Union Cabinet Minister for Communications and Information Technology : The Comptroller and Auditor General holds Raja personally responsible for the sale of 2G spectrum at 2001 rates in 2008, resulting in the previously mentioned loss of up to Rs. 1.76 lakh crores (US$40 billion) to the national exchequer.In August, 2010, evidence was submitted by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) showing that Raja had personally signed and approved the majority of the questionable allocations. Kanimozhi Aravindhan, Member of Rajya Sabha : On April 25, 2011 Kanimozhi was named as a co-conspirator in the supplementary chargesheet filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in connection with the 2G spectrum case. The chargesheet submitted before the Supreme Court establishes how Rs 200 crore connected with the scam traveled from a partnership firm of businessman Shahid Balwa of Swan Telecom to the Karunanidhi family-owned Kalaignar TV.She has been charged with section 7 and 11 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The sections deal with acceptance of alleged gratification. Bureaucrats involved: Siddhartha Behura, Civil Servant (IAS officer of 1973 batch UP cadre) : He was the Telecom secretary who served in the DOT at the time of the 2G allocation. Pradip Baijal, Civil Servant (IAS officer of 1966 batch MP cadre) : He is alleged to have recommended policies that favored certain Telecom companies when he was heading the TRAI. Post retirement, Baijal joined Noesis, a consulting firm.Raja has made references to Baijal's decisions in 2003 as the basis for his decisions in 2008; something which has been attacked by Arun Shourie and several media pundits. The houses and offices of the bureaucrat were recently[when?] visited by the Central Bureau of Investigation as part of their investigations.However, Baijal is expected to get a clean chit in this issue. R K Chandolia, Civil Servant (IES officer of 1984 batch cadre) : He was private secretary of Raja during UPA-I when the licences were awarded. When Raja became the Telecom Minister once again in UPA-II, Chandolia had been promoted to the Joint Secretary rank. Raja re-designated him Economic Adviser, that gave him the charge of all important policy-related work. Chandolia interacted with all the licensees. It is said that it was Chandolia who, from DDG-access services A K Srivastava's room, had handed out letters of intent to representatives of various companies. Corporations involved: Allianz Infra Aircel Dishnet Wireless Loop Mobile Sistema Shyam Mobile (MTS) – Sistema Mobile Russia Reliance Communications S Tel Swan Telecom Tata Tele Services Unitech Group Videocon Telecommunications Limited Vodafone Essar Virgin Mobile India Corporate personalities involved: Anil Ambani - Reliance Group (ADAG) Ratan Tata Shahid Balwa - Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB) Vinod Goenka - Swan Telecom (now Etisalat DB) Venugopal Dhoot - Videocon Group Prashant Ruia - Essar Group Sanjay Chandra, Managing Director of Unitech Ltd and Unitech Wireless All of them have either been questioned by the CBI or are prospective suspects in the scam. Media persons and lobbyists involved: Nira Radia, a former airline entrepreneur turned corporate lobbyist whose conversations with politicians and corporate entities were recorded by the government authorities. The contents were later leaked by unknown parties creating the Nira Radia tapes controversy. Politicans, Ministers and Parlimentarians involved: Dayanidhi Maran, former Union Cabinet Minister for Textiles : The main allegation revealed by Tehelka magazine and followed up in several other reports, is that Maran forced C Sivasankaran, owner of Aircel, to sell the telecom company to Maran's Malaysia-based friend T Ananda Krishnan in 2006. The reports allege that Maran deliberately delayed issuing spectrum licenses to Aircel's sister concern, Dishnet Wireless, when it was owned by Sivasankaran. He issued the licenses soon after it changed hands to Ananda Krishnan who owns Maxis.[16] P. Chidambaram, current Union Cabinet Minister for Home Affairs : Subramaniam Swamy states that when the 2g Spectrum rate was finalised, P.Chidambaram was the finance minister of India and he had a major role in deciding the spectrum price with A.Raja. Subramaniam alleges that Chidambaram had received kickbacks and undervalued the spectrum cost. [17] Petitioners to 2g scam: Subramaniam Swamy, activist lawyer and politician, whose letters to the Prime Minister demanding action and affidavits and cases in the Supreme Court brought the issue into the public limelight. Paranjoy Guha Thakurta, a journalist who was one among the very first to write on the irregularities in the awarding of 2G spectrum allocation by the Telecom Ministry. He is also one of the petitioners in the 2G PIL currently being heard in the Supreme court.[18] Prashant Bhushan, on behalf of the Centre for Public Interest Litigation. Anil Kumar, on behalf of the civil society organisationTelecom Watchdog Others:Several eminent people like former chief election commissioners J.M. Lyngdoh, T.S. Krishnamurthy and N. Gopalaswami and former central vigilance commissioner (CVC) P. Shankar are also petitioners in the suits filed by civil society groups. Loss to Exchequer: The Controller and Auditor General of India used three different methods to assess the presumptive loss to the exchequer resulting from not auctioning 2G spectrum.[19] The first method was based on the fact that S Tel, one of the licensees, explicitly offered to pay significantly higher license fees for the spectrum. Based on the fees offered by S Tel, the CAG estimated the loss to the exchequer at 67,364 crore (US$15.02 billion) The second method was based on the price recovered by the 3G auction in 2010. The CAG reasoned that since 2G is really 2.75G (EDGE), its price should be comparable to that of 3G licenses. Based on this method, the CAG estimated the loss to the exchequer to be 176,000 crore (US$39.25 billion) The third method was based on the fact that some of the licensees received FDI in the form of equity, shortly after the spectrum allocation. The CAG reasoned that this equity infusion was entirely due to the value of the allocated spectrum; this can be construed as re-sale of the spectrum by the licensee, and hence was a valid basis for assessing loss to the exchequer. Based on this method, the CAG estimated the loss to the exchequer to be anywhere between 57,666 crore (US$12.86 billion) (based on Etisalat's investment in Swan Telecom) and 69,626 crore (US$15.53 billion) (based on Telenor's investment in Unitech). For its part, the Congress-party led government has publicly defended itself on this count and Kapil Sibal, who replaced A. Raja as the communication minister, has refuted the CAG reasoning.[20] He has also justified his government's decision not to auction 2G spectrum as being in line with the policy guidelines laid down by the 10th Five-Year Plan.[21][22] Relationship between media and government: Media sources such as OPEN and Outlook reported that Barkha Dutt and Vir Sanghvi knew that corporate lobbyist Nira Radia was influencing the decisions of A. Raja.[23] The critics alleged that Dutt and Sanghvi knew about corruption between the government and the media industry, supported this corrupt activity, and suppressed news reporting the discovery of the corruption.] Ratan Tata petitions over leak: The tapes leaked to the public include conversations between Nira Radia and Ratan Tata. Tata petitioned the government to acknowledge his right to privacy and demanded accountability for the leak, with the Minister for Home Affairs, CBI, Indian Income Tax Department, the Department of Telecommunication, and the Department of Information Technology as respondents in the petition.[24] On April 4, 2011 Indian Parliament's Public Accounts Committee (PAC)questioned Tata Sons Chairman Ratan Tata and corporate lobbyist Niira Radia regarding their roles in 2G Scam.[25] Response to scam: In early November 2010 Telecom Minister A Raja resigned. In mid November the controller Vinod Rai issued show-cause notices to Unitech, S Tel, Loop Mobile, Datacom (Videocon), and Etisalat to respond to his assertion that all of the 85 licenses granted to these companies did not have the up-front capital required at the time of the application and were in other ways illegal.[26] Some media sources have speculated that these companies will receive large fines but not have their licenses revoked, as they are currently providing some consumer service.[26] In response to the various allegations, the Govt of India has replaced the then incumbent Telecom minister, A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List
    HIGH COURT OF DELHI ADVANCE CAUSE LIST LIST OF BUSINESS FOR TH FRIDAY,THE 14 FEBRUARY,2014 INDEX PAGES 1. APPELLATE JURISDICTION 01 TO 33 2. SPECIAL BENCH (APPLT. SIDE) 34 TO 43 3. COMPANY JURISDICTION 44 TO 46 4. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 47 TO 60 5. REGISTRAR GENERAL/ 61 TO 74 REGISTRAR(ORGL.)/ REGISTRAR (ADMN.)/ JOINT REGISTRARS(ORGL). 14.02.2014 1 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 14.02.2014 [Note : Unless otherwise specified, before all appellate side courts, fresh matters shown in the supplementary lists will be taken up first.] COURT NO. 1 (DIVISION BENCH-1) HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW [NOTE-I: COUNSELS ARE REQUESTED TO PAGINATE THEIR FILES IN CONFORMITY WITH THE COURT FILE IN ADVANCE.] [NOTE-II: COUNSELS ARE REQUESTED TO PROVIDE LIST OF BOOKS/ACTS ON WHICH THEY ARE RELYING IN ADVANCE.] FRESH MATTERS & APPLICATIONS 1. LPA 125/2014 TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION J SAGAR ASSOCIATES,PRASHANT CM APPL. 2434/2014 LIMITED BHUSHAN CM APPL. 2435/2014 Vs. COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR CM APPL. 2436/2014 GENERAL OF INDIA AND ORS 2. LPA 144/2014 HEENA AND ANR VIKAS SHARMA,YOGESH CM APPL. 2623/2014 Vs. AUROBINDO COLLEGE ( SHARMA,SUVRAT EVENING ) AND ORS FOR ADMISSION 3. LPA 140/2014 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED AMARCHAND AND MANGALDAS AND CM APPL. 2572/2014 Vs. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF SURESH,PRASHANT CM APPL. 2573/2014 DELHI AND ORS BHUSHAN,ZUBEDA BEGUM,GAURANG CM APPL. 2574/2014 KANTH 4. LPA 141/2014 BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED AMARCHAND AND MANGALDAS AND CM APPL. 2575/2014 Vs. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF SURESH,PRASHANT BHUSHAN CM APPL.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study of Reliance Jio
    International Journal of Trade & Commerce-IIARTC January-June 2017, Volume 6, No. 1 pp. 173-180 ISSN-2277-5811 (Print), 2278-9065 (Online) © SGSR. (www.sgsrjournals.co.in) All rights reserved UGC Approved Journal in Social Science Category; Journal No. 48636 COSMOS (Germany) JIF: 4.242; ISRA JIF: 3.957; NAAS Rating 3.55; ISI JIF: 3.721 New Era in Telecommunication- The Study of Reliance Jio B. Kumar Faculty of Commerce & Business Administration, Meerut College, Meerut (U.P), India E-mail Id: [email protected] Abstract PAPER/ARTICLE INFO Being world’s second largest population of 1.2 billion, India is a young RECEIVED ON: 11/03/2017 nation with 63% of its population under the age of 35 years. It has a fast ACCEPTED ON: 16/05/2017 growing digital audience with 800 million mobile connections and over 200 million internet users. Reliance thoroughly believes in India’s Reference to this paper potential to lead the world with its capabilities in innovation. Towards should be made as follows: that end, Reliance envisages creation of a digital revolution in India. Reliance Jio aims to enable this transformation by creating not just a B. Kumar (2017), ―New Era cutting-edge voice and broadband network, but also a powerful eco-system in Telecommunication- The on which a range of rich digital services will be enabled – a unique green- Study of Reliance Jio‖, Int. J. field opportunity. of Trade and Commerce- The three-pronged focus on broadband networks, affordable smart phones IIARTC, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. and the availability of rich content and applications has enabled Jio to 173-180 create an integrated business strategy from the very beginning, and today, Jio is capable of offering a unique combination of telecom, high speed data, digital commerce, media and payment services.
    [Show full text]
  • Lokpal and Good Governance Pjaee, 17 (7) (2020)
    LOKPAL AND GOOD GOVERNANCE PJAEE, 17 (7) (2020) LOKPAL AND GOOD GOVERNANCE Parishkar Shreshth Research Scholar, Amity University, Lucknow Campus. Lucknow, U.P. – 226028 Email ID: [email protected] Parishkar Shreshth. LOKPAL AND GOOD GOVERNANCE--Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology 17(7), 11030-11037. ISSN 1567-214x Keywords: Lokpal Bill, Governance, Corruption. Abstract We have not received an adequate benefit from the government for decades since our independence. India is now a young country that is at a transitional stage. Today citizens of India want to utilise all the resources and opportunities most productively. So, good governance is mandatory for total development. Because of the uncertainty about India's country, it is possible only a Lokpal like institution can change peoples' minds about development. We are waiting for a major positive change. Corruption in India is a major concern and is a detriment to the economy. According to research, the bulk of public corruption is financed by a government programme. Now voters in India appreciate the value of their vote. They usually call for the development of a system to reduce corruption. The Lokpal bill against corruption is a good tool, but its implementation has been held back because of a lack of enthusiasm and disappointment. The purpose of this study is to understand voters' thoughts and feelings about the Lokpal bill. This paper highlights the significant issues of Lokpal and its impact on governance. Introduction Governance is a Human concept. There is an important discussion about governance taking place right now. Usually, governance refers to the tasks of running the government.
    [Show full text]
  • Has the Judiciary Turned Its Back on the Poor?
    HAS THE JUDICIARY TURNED ITS BACK ON THE POOR? A Report on the Seminar 4th November 2006 At Indian Society for International Law 9, Bhagwan Dass Raod, New Delhi A film by Ruzbeh N.Barucha – “yamuna gently weeps” was shown in the beginning of the seminar. The film was very emotive and reflected the trauma the oustees have undergone in Yamuna Pushta Demolition drive ordered by the Delhi High Court in January 2004. Welcome by Shri Prashant Bhushan, Advocate, Supreme Court However, it was a very powerful film as we saw just now. There was a time, not so long ago, when the Supreme Court of India waxed eloquent about the Fundamental right to life and liberty guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution to include all that it takes to lead a decent and dignified life. They thus held that the right to life includes the right to food, the right to employment and the right to shelter: in other words, the right to all the necessities of life. All that seems a distant dream now, given the recent role of the courts in not just failing to protect the rights of the poor that they had themselves declared not long ago, but in fact spearheading the massive assault on the poor, particularly since the era of economic liberalisation. This is happening in case after case, whether they are of the tribal oustees of the Narmada Dam, or the urban slum dwellers whose homes were being ruthlessly bulldozed without notice and without rehabilitation. Similarly, the hawkers of Delhi and Mumbai have been evicted from the streets pursuant to the orders of the court.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Post Purchase Behaviour of Jio Phone with Reference to Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd Doddaballapura”
    PROJECT REPORT (17MBAPR407) “A Study on post purchase behaviour of Jio phone with reference to Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd Doddaballapura” BY Nagesh P USN: 1AY17MBA31 Submitted to VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, BELAGAVI In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Under the guidance of INTERNAL GUIDE EXTERNAL GUIDE Dr. Nijaguna G Mr. Rakesh Panchavoli NS Professor Point Manager Dept of MBA, AIT Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd Doddaballapura Department of MBA Acharya Institute of technology, Soldevanahalli, Hesaragatta Main Road, Bengaluru March2019 ... ....... .. .. .... .... .... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... .. ... ........ e ... .............. ..................................................... .. .. .. ...... .. ....... .................... ....... ............. ....... .... .. ......................... .. ................... ............. .. Place: Bengaluru Date:23/03/2019 Certificate This is to certify that Mr. NAGESH P student of final year MBA bearing USN No lAYl 7MBA31, student of Acharya Institute of technology, Bangalore, affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi, he has successfully completed his internship project titled "A STUDY ON POST PURCHASE BEHAVIOUR OF JIO PHONE AT RELIENCE JIO INFOCOM LTD DODDBALLAPURA" starting from 03- 01 -2019 to 16-02-2019. During the period of his Project program with us he was found punctual, hardworking and his character was satisfactory. This project on evaluation fulfills all the stated criteria and the student's
    [Show full text]
  • Reaching for the Stars: the Incredible Rise of Arvind Kejriwal Vidya Subrahmaniam Feb 25, 2015
    Reaching for the Stars: The Incredible Rise of Arvind Kejriwal Vidya Subrahmaniam Feb 25, 2015 Arvind Kejriwal, Chief Minister of Delhi. - FILE PHOTO: SHANKER CHAKRAVARTY Five years ago, Arvind Kejriwal was far from being the man of the masses he is today. The Hindu Centre's Senior Fellow Vidya Subrahmaniam, who as a correspondent with The Hindu followed Kejriwal's public life between 2006 and 2014, traces his rise from activism to political stardom. In the immediate afterglow of the Assembly election, everyone seemed to be smiling in Delhi. A friend out on his morning walk found strangers congratulating him on the Aam Aadmi Party’s (AAP’s) superhero-sized victory. He returned the compliment, aware that like him, they were ordinary citizens basking in the reflected glory of Arvind Kejriwal’s brilliantly executed electoral coup. As results poured in, television anchors, across channels, briefly forgot to be officious. The incorrigibly rude Arnab Goswami attempted poetry and watched bemusedly as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) spokesperson and his counterpart in the AAP warred and sparred in shayari (Urdu poetry). Visuals suggested a carnival-like mood on the streets. Delhi did not erupt in such sheer joy even when the BJP’s Narendra Modi broke a 30-year jinx to win a majority in the 2014 Lok Sabha election. The emotional, spontaneous response was reminiscent of 1977, when the all-new Janata Party unseated Indira Gandhi after the Emergency. The AAP’s victory was the sweeter for having come in the most exacting circumstances. Kejriwal had ceased to be Kejriwal since quitting as Delhi’s Chief Minister in February 2014 — after only 49 days in office.
    [Show full text]
  • AAP Rebel Leader Prashant Bhushan Has Written Wrote an Open Letter To
    AAP rebel leader Prashant Bhushan has written wrote an open letter to AAP Supremo, Arvind Kejriwal comparing Kejriwal with Russian leader Stalin in allegged dictatorial attitude . Bhushan said: "God and history will not forgive what you are doing to the party." The full text of his letter to Kejriwal is as under : Dear Arvind, In the National Council meeting held on the March 28, in your Convenor's address, instead of giving a review of the party's situation and the path ahead, you chose to launch an attack on Yogendra Ji, my father and me, making all sorts of false and inflammatory allegations against us. Your speech incited several Delhi MLAs- (who were invited despite not being members of the NC) to scream that we were "gaddars" who should be thrown out, and behave in the manner of hooligans. Such was the ferocity of the mob of these MLAs and others as they rushed towards my father, that he felt that he may not get out of this alive. You did not even allow us to respond to your allegations. Immediately after your speech, in the middle of shouting and screaming by MLAs and others, Manish read out a resolution for our removal (without any chair, and without anyone allowing him to do so). He then proceeded to call for vote by show of hands without allowing any discussion, forcing us to walk out of what had clearly become a farce. It was farcical for many reasons: Many members of the NC had not been invited or allowed to attend; more than half the people inside the meeting hall were non-members, which included MLAs, district and State convenors of four states, volunteers and bouncers; there was no orderly conduct of the proceedings for many reasons, including the hooliganism displayed by many people there; no independent videography was allowed, the party's Lokpal was not allowed, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of India Notice
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA NOTICE IN CONTINUATION OF NOTICE DATED 6TH JULY, 2021, TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT THE MATTERS CONTAINED IN THE LIST APPENDED BELOW ARE ALSO LIKELY TO BE LISTED BEFORE THE HON©BLE COURTS ON 8TH JULY, 2021(THURSDAY) OR THEREAFTER. DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2021 sd/- ADDL. REGISTRAR (DEU) TO ALL CONCERNED Sl. Case No. Title Advocate Name No. @ DiaryNo. 1. Crl.A. No. VIVEK KUMAR @ KARI RISHI MALHOTRA[P-1] 532/2019 Versus DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1] THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SLP(Crl) SHAHID IQBAL KHAN HIREN DASAN No. Versus NIRANJANA SINGH[R-1], 5371/2019 THE STATE OF BIHAR AND GAURAV AGRAWAL[R-2], [R-3], ORS. [R-4] 3. SLP(Crl) SAGIRAJU RANGA RAJU NILOFAR KHAN No. Versus 5556/2020 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. 4. W.P.(Crl.) SAUDAMINI SAHOO RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL No. 3/2021 Versus ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], CENTRAL BUREAU OF E. C. AGRAWALA[R-2] INVESTIGATION AND ANR. 5. SLP(Crl) MANOJ KUMAR SURABHI SANCHITA No. Versus VINOD KUMAR TEWARI[R-1], 2013/2021 SUNNY KUMAR @ MONU AND D. K. DEVESH[R-2], [R-2] ANR. 6. Diary No. K. MURUGANANDAM AND T. ARCHANA[P-1] 8150-2021 ORS. JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[R-1] Versus STATE REP. BY ITS THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND ANR. 7. Diary No. PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LTD. RAJESH P. 27035-2019 Versus HIMANSHU SHEKHAR[R-1] MOHIT KHIRBAT 8. SLP(C) No. MAHESH KUMAR KEJRIWAL PARTHA SIL 1761/2020 AND ANR. KUSH CHATURVEDI[CAVEAT] Versus RAMESH KUMAR KEJRIWAL AND ORS.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW PETITION (Cr) No. of 2018 (Under Article 137 of the Constitution
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [REVIEW JURISDICTION] REVIEW PETITION (Cr) No. OF 2018 (Under Article 137 of the Constitution of India) IN WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 298 OF 2018 IN THE MATTER OF:- 1. Yashwant Sinha : …Petitioner No. 1 2. Arun Shourie …Petitioner No. 2 3. Prashant Bhushan …Petitioner No. 3 Versus 1. Central Bureau of Investigation Through it’s Director, Plot No. 5-B, 6th Floor, CGO Complex Lodhi Road, New Delhi -110003 …Respondent No. 1 2. Union of India Through it’s Cabinet Secretary Cabinet Secretariat New Delhi -110001 …Respondent No. 2 PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 137 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH ORDER XLVII OF SUPREME COURT RULES, 2013, SEEKING REVIEW OF JUDGEMENT DATED 14.12.2018 IN WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 298 OF 2018 To, THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA AND HIS COMPANION JUDGES OF THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA The Humble Petition of the Petitioners above-named MOST RESPECTFULLY SHEWETH:- 1. That the instant petition seeks review of judgement dated 14.12.2018 of the Hon’ble Court in W.P.(Cr) 298 of 2018 as the impugned judgement is based on errors apparent on the face of the record and subsequent information has come to light non consideration of which will cause grave miscarriage of justice. 2. That for the sake of brevity not all the averments in the petition in W.P. (Cr.) 298 of 2018 are reiterated herein but they may be taken as part and parcel of the present petition. (I) Errors apparent on the face of the record 3.Prayer of petitioners for registration of FIR and investigation by CBI not dealt with and instead the contract has been reviewed prematurely without the benefit of any investigation or inquiry into disputed questions of facts.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 11 SCR SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY V
    [2012] 11 S.C.R. 873 874 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 11 S.C.R. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY A A Ministers – A wrong judgment or an inaccurate or incorrect v. approach or poor management, by itself cannot be said to be A. RAJA a product of criminal conspiracy – In view of the materials on (Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 1688 of 2012 etc.) record, it cannot be said that Finance Minister had misused his position or conspired or colluded with the Telecom AUGUST 24, 2012 B B Minister so as to fix low entry fee by non-visiting spectrum [G.S. SINGHVI AND K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, JJ.] charges fixed in the year 2001 – No materials were made available even for a prima facie conclusion that the Finance SCAM: Minister had deliberately allowed dilution of equity of the two companies – There is also no material made available to 2G Spectrum Scam – Complaint by the appellant before C C conclude that the Finance Minister abused his official position Special Judge CBI to set in motion provisions of Prevention or used any corrupt or illegal means for obtaining any of Corruption Act, against the then Telecom Minister – During pecuniary advantage for himself or for any other person – No examination u/s. 200 Cr.P.C.,the appellant made allegation case is made out against him. that the then Finance Minister and the Telecom Minister were jointly and severely responsible for the scam – Prayer for Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Ors. etc. v. Union D D making the Finance Minister an accused and for carrying out of India and Ors.
    [Show full text]
  • Game Theory: Mid-Term Paper
    Game Theory: Mid-term Paper Analysis of entry of Aam Aadmi Party in Indian politics with focus on the Delhi Legislative Assembly 2013 By: Samarth Agarwal, Anik Ghosh, Sagar Pandya, Christian Pfab, Taka Omote Game Theory – mid-term paper 10/29/2014 Executive Summary Indian politics has been characterised by two primary national parties, Indian National Congress (“Congress”) and the Bhartiya Janata Party (“BJP”), and several small regional parties. The Indian political campaigns were historically fought on Left vs Right policies and religious ideologues. Irrespective of the political bent, Indian politics was characterised by widespread corruption and criminalisation of politics. The emergence of the Aam Aadmi Party (“AAP”), born out of an anti-corruption movement in India which started in 2010 after a series of multi-billion dollar scams came to light, added a third dimension to the political dialogue - that of anti-corruption. In late 2012 AAP announced its plans to contest the upcoming Delhi elections. And we want to analyse the series of events that transpired in the Delhi election, especially as they would have a direct impact on the upcoming national elections in May 2014. Brief Context – Summary of Political History of India Since its independence from the British Raj in 1947, India’s political system is a federal parliamentary democratic republic, a multi-party system with a large number of national and regional parties. Despite the large number of different parties, contemporary Indian politics has been dominated by two major parties, the Indian National Congress (“Congress”) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (“BJP”). Congress is one of the largest and oldest democratically-operating political parties in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • In the High Court of Delhi, at New Delhi (Extraordinary Civil Jurisdiction) Writ Petition (Civil) No...O
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI, AT NEW DELHI (EXTRAORDINARY CIVIL JURISDICTION) WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. .................... OF 2017 A WRIT PETITION IN PUBLIC INTEREST UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SEEKING A THOROUGH SIT INVESTIGATION INTO THE OVER-INVOICING OF POWER EQUIPMENT AND FUEL PURCHASED BY POWER GENERATING COMPANIES IN ORDER TO CHEAT THE PEOPLE AND TO SIPHON OFF FUNDS FROM PUBLIC COMPANIES MEMO OF PARTIES IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION: 1. CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (A REGISTERED SOCIETY) THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY MS. KAMINI JAISWAL 43, LAWYERS CHAMBERS SUPREME COURT OF INDIA NEW DELHI-110001 …PETITIONER NO. 1 2. COMMON CAUSE (A REGISTERED SOCIETY) THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR MR. VIPUL MUDGAL 5, INSTITUTIONAL AREA NELSON MANDELA ROAD VASANT KUNJ, NEW DELHI-110070 …PETITIONER NO. 2 VERSUS 1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CABINET SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA CABINET SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI-110001 … RESPONDENT NO. 1 2. DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL 7TH FLOOR, D-BLOCK, I.P. BHAWAN I.P. ESTATE, NEW DELHI … RESPONDENT NO. 2 3. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR PLOT NO. 5-B, 6TH FLOOR CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI-110003 … RESPONDENT NO. 3 NEW DELHI DATED: (PRASHANT BHUSHAN) ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER 301, NEW LAWYERS CHAMBERS SUPREME COURT OF INDIA NEW DELHI-110001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI, AT NEW DELHI (EXTRAORDINARY CIVIL JURISDICTION) WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. .................... OF 2017 IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION: CENTRE
    [Show full text]