The Study of Reliance Jio
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List
HIGH COURT OF DELHI ADVANCE CAUSE LIST LIST OF BUSINESS FOR TH FRIDAY,THE 14 FEBRUARY,2014 INDEX PAGES 1. APPELLATE JURISDICTION 01 TO 33 2. SPECIAL BENCH (APPLT. SIDE) 34 TO 43 3. COMPANY JURISDICTION 44 TO 46 4. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 47 TO 60 5. REGISTRAR GENERAL/ 61 TO 74 REGISTRAR(ORGL.)/ REGISTRAR (ADMN.)/ JOINT REGISTRARS(ORGL). 14.02.2014 1 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 14.02.2014 [Note : Unless otherwise specified, before all appellate side courts, fresh matters shown in the supplementary lists will be taken up first.] COURT NO. 1 (DIVISION BENCH-1) HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW [NOTE-I: COUNSELS ARE REQUESTED TO PAGINATE THEIR FILES IN CONFORMITY WITH THE COURT FILE IN ADVANCE.] [NOTE-II: COUNSELS ARE REQUESTED TO PROVIDE LIST OF BOOKS/ACTS ON WHICH THEY ARE RELYING IN ADVANCE.] FRESH MATTERS & APPLICATIONS 1. LPA 125/2014 TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION J SAGAR ASSOCIATES,PRASHANT CM APPL. 2434/2014 LIMITED BHUSHAN CM APPL. 2435/2014 Vs. COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR CM APPL. 2436/2014 GENERAL OF INDIA AND ORS 2. LPA 144/2014 HEENA AND ANR VIKAS SHARMA,YOGESH CM APPL. 2623/2014 Vs. AUROBINDO COLLEGE ( SHARMA,SUVRAT EVENING ) AND ORS FOR ADMISSION 3. LPA 140/2014 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED AMARCHAND AND MANGALDAS AND CM APPL. 2572/2014 Vs. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF SURESH,PRASHANT CM APPL. 2573/2014 DELHI AND ORS BHUSHAN,ZUBEDA BEGUM,GAURANG CM APPL. 2574/2014 KANTH 4. LPA 141/2014 BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED AMARCHAND AND MANGALDAS AND CM APPL. 2575/2014 Vs. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF SURESH,PRASHANT BHUSHAN CM APPL. -
Reliance Mart Is One Such Subsidiary
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The Reliance Group founded by Dhirubhai H.Ambani (1932-2002), is India’s largest private sector enterprise, with businesses in the energy and materials value chain. The company Reliance Industries Limited was co-founded by Dhirubhai Ambani and his brother Champaklal Damani as Reliance Commercial Corporation. In 1965 the partnership was ended and DhiruBhai continued. Reliance was established as a textile concerns in the year 1966. This company followed a diversified a diversification strategy since its inception. It vertically integrated. This resulted in formation of many subsidiaries. Reliance Mart is one such subsidiary. Reliance Mart is a part of the Reliance Industries is actually the largest conglomerate in India. Reliance mart is the subsidiary company of Reliance Industries. Founded in 2006 and based in Mumbai, It is the largest retailer in India in terms of revenue. Its retail outlets offer foods, groceries, apparel and footwear, lifestyle and home improvement products, electronic goods and farm implements and inputs. The company’s outlets also provide vegetables, fruits and flower. It focuses on consumer goods, consumer durables, travel services, energy, entertainment and leisure, and health and well being products, as well as on educational products and services. Backward vertical integration has been the cornerstone of the evolution and growth of Reliance. Starting with textiles in the late seventies, Reliance pursued a strategy of backward vertical integration – in polyester, fibre intermediates, plastics, petrochemicals, petroleum refining and oil and gas exploration and production – to be fully integrated along the materials and energy value chain. The group’s activities span exploration and production of oil and gas, petroleum refining and marketing, petrochemicals (polyester, fibre intermediaries, plastics and chemicals), Textiles, retail and special economic zones. -
Lokpal and Good Governance Pjaee, 17 (7) (2020)
LOKPAL AND GOOD GOVERNANCE PJAEE, 17 (7) (2020) LOKPAL AND GOOD GOVERNANCE Parishkar Shreshth Research Scholar, Amity University, Lucknow Campus. Lucknow, U.P. – 226028 Email ID: [email protected] Parishkar Shreshth. LOKPAL AND GOOD GOVERNANCE--Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology 17(7), 11030-11037. ISSN 1567-214x Keywords: Lokpal Bill, Governance, Corruption. Abstract We have not received an adequate benefit from the government for decades since our independence. India is now a young country that is at a transitional stage. Today citizens of India want to utilise all the resources and opportunities most productively. So, good governance is mandatory for total development. Because of the uncertainty about India's country, it is possible only a Lokpal like institution can change peoples' minds about development. We are waiting for a major positive change. Corruption in India is a major concern and is a detriment to the economy. According to research, the bulk of public corruption is financed by a government programme. Now voters in India appreciate the value of their vote. They usually call for the development of a system to reduce corruption. The Lokpal bill against corruption is a good tool, but its implementation has been held back because of a lack of enthusiasm and disappointment. The purpose of this study is to understand voters' thoughts and feelings about the Lokpal bill. This paper highlights the significant issues of Lokpal and its impact on governance. Introduction Governance is a Human concept. There is an important discussion about governance taking place right now. Usually, governance refers to the tasks of running the government. -
Has the Judiciary Turned Its Back on the Poor?
HAS THE JUDICIARY TURNED ITS BACK ON THE POOR? A Report on the Seminar 4th November 2006 At Indian Society for International Law 9, Bhagwan Dass Raod, New Delhi A film by Ruzbeh N.Barucha – “yamuna gently weeps” was shown in the beginning of the seminar. The film was very emotive and reflected the trauma the oustees have undergone in Yamuna Pushta Demolition drive ordered by the Delhi High Court in January 2004. Welcome by Shri Prashant Bhushan, Advocate, Supreme Court However, it was a very powerful film as we saw just now. There was a time, not so long ago, when the Supreme Court of India waxed eloquent about the Fundamental right to life and liberty guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution to include all that it takes to lead a decent and dignified life. They thus held that the right to life includes the right to food, the right to employment and the right to shelter: in other words, the right to all the necessities of life. All that seems a distant dream now, given the recent role of the courts in not just failing to protect the rights of the poor that they had themselves declared not long ago, but in fact spearheading the massive assault on the poor, particularly since the era of economic liberalisation. This is happening in case after case, whether they are of the tribal oustees of the Narmada Dam, or the urban slum dwellers whose homes were being ruthlessly bulldozed without notice and without rehabilitation. Similarly, the hawkers of Delhi and Mumbai have been evicted from the streets pursuant to the orders of the court. -
A Study on Post Purchase Behaviour of Jio Phone with Reference to Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd Doddaballapura”
PROJECT REPORT (17MBAPR407) “A Study on post purchase behaviour of Jio phone with reference to Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd Doddaballapura” BY Nagesh P USN: 1AY17MBA31 Submitted to VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, BELAGAVI In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Under the guidance of INTERNAL GUIDE EXTERNAL GUIDE Dr. Nijaguna G Mr. Rakesh Panchavoli NS Professor Point Manager Dept of MBA, AIT Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd Doddaballapura Department of MBA Acharya Institute of technology, Soldevanahalli, Hesaragatta Main Road, Bengaluru March2019 ... ....... .. .. .... .... .... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... .. ... ........ e ... .............. ..................................................... .. .. .. ...... .. ....... .................... ....... ............. ....... .... .. ......................... .. ................... ............. .. Place: Bengaluru Date:23/03/2019 Certificate This is to certify that Mr. NAGESH P student of final year MBA bearing USN No lAYl 7MBA31, student of Acharya Institute of technology, Bangalore, affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi, he has successfully completed his internship project titled "A STUDY ON POST PURCHASE BEHAVIOUR OF JIO PHONE AT RELIENCE JIO INFOCOM LTD DODDBALLAPURA" starting from 03- 01 -2019 to 16-02-2019. During the period of his Project program with us he was found punctual, hardworking and his character was satisfactory. This project on evaluation fulfills all the stated criteria and the student's -
Reaching for the Stars: the Incredible Rise of Arvind Kejriwal Vidya Subrahmaniam Feb 25, 2015
Reaching for the Stars: The Incredible Rise of Arvind Kejriwal Vidya Subrahmaniam Feb 25, 2015 Arvind Kejriwal, Chief Minister of Delhi. - FILE PHOTO: SHANKER CHAKRAVARTY Five years ago, Arvind Kejriwal was far from being the man of the masses he is today. The Hindu Centre's Senior Fellow Vidya Subrahmaniam, who as a correspondent with The Hindu followed Kejriwal's public life between 2006 and 2014, traces his rise from activism to political stardom. In the immediate afterglow of the Assembly election, everyone seemed to be smiling in Delhi. A friend out on his morning walk found strangers congratulating him on the Aam Aadmi Party’s (AAP’s) superhero-sized victory. He returned the compliment, aware that like him, they were ordinary citizens basking in the reflected glory of Arvind Kejriwal’s brilliantly executed electoral coup. As results poured in, television anchors, across channels, briefly forgot to be officious. The incorrigibly rude Arnab Goswami attempted poetry and watched bemusedly as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) spokesperson and his counterpart in the AAP warred and sparred in shayari (Urdu poetry). Visuals suggested a carnival-like mood on the streets. Delhi did not erupt in such sheer joy even when the BJP’s Narendra Modi broke a 30-year jinx to win a majority in the 2014 Lok Sabha election. The emotional, spontaneous response was reminiscent of 1977, when the all-new Janata Party unseated Indira Gandhi after the Emergency. The AAP’s victory was the sweeter for having come in the most exacting circumstances. Kejriwal had ceased to be Kejriwal since quitting as Delhi’s Chief Minister in February 2014 — after only 49 days in office. -
AAP Rebel Leader Prashant Bhushan Has Written Wrote an Open Letter To
AAP rebel leader Prashant Bhushan has written wrote an open letter to AAP Supremo, Arvind Kejriwal comparing Kejriwal with Russian leader Stalin in allegged dictatorial attitude . Bhushan said: "God and history will not forgive what you are doing to the party." The full text of his letter to Kejriwal is as under : Dear Arvind, In the National Council meeting held on the March 28, in your Convenor's address, instead of giving a review of the party's situation and the path ahead, you chose to launch an attack on Yogendra Ji, my father and me, making all sorts of false and inflammatory allegations against us. Your speech incited several Delhi MLAs- (who were invited despite not being members of the NC) to scream that we were "gaddars" who should be thrown out, and behave in the manner of hooligans. Such was the ferocity of the mob of these MLAs and others as they rushed towards my father, that he felt that he may not get out of this alive. You did not even allow us to respond to your allegations. Immediately after your speech, in the middle of shouting and screaming by MLAs and others, Manish read out a resolution for our removal (without any chair, and without anyone allowing him to do so). He then proceeded to call for vote by show of hands without allowing any discussion, forcing us to walk out of what had clearly become a farce. It was farcical for many reasons: Many members of the NC had not been invited or allowed to attend; more than half the people inside the meeting hall were non-members, which included MLAs, district and State convenors of four states, volunteers and bouncers; there was no orderly conduct of the proceedings for many reasons, including the hooliganism displayed by many people there; no independent videography was allowed, the party's Lokpal was not allowed, etc. -
Supreme Court of India Notice
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA NOTICE IN CONTINUATION OF NOTICE DATED 6TH JULY, 2021, TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT THE MATTERS CONTAINED IN THE LIST APPENDED BELOW ARE ALSO LIKELY TO BE LISTED BEFORE THE HON©BLE COURTS ON 8TH JULY, 2021(THURSDAY) OR THEREAFTER. DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2021 sd/- ADDL. REGISTRAR (DEU) TO ALL CONCERNED Sl. Case No. Title Advocate Name No. @ DiaryNo. 1. Crl.A. No. VIVEK KUMAR @ KARI RISHI MALHOTRA[P-1] 532/2019 Versus DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1] THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SLP(Crl) SHAHID IQBAL KHAN HIREN DASAN No. Versus NIRANJANA SINGH[R-1], 5371/2019 THE STATE OF BIHAR AND GAURAV AGRAWAL[R-2], [R-3], ORS. [R-4] 3. SLP(Crl) SAGIRAJU RANGA RAJU NILOFAR KHAN No. Versus 5556/2020 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. 4. W.P.(Crl.) SAUDAMINI SAHOO RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL No. 3/2021 Versus ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], CENTRAL BUREAU OF E. C. AGRAWALA[R-2] INVESTIGATION AND ANR. 5. SLP(Crl) MANOJ KUMAR SURABHI SANCHITA No. Versus VINOD KUMAR TEWARI[R-1], 2013/2021 SUNNY KUMAR @ MONU AND D. K. DEVESH[R-2], [R-2] ANR. 6. Diary No. K. MURUGANANDAM AND T. ARCHANA[P-1] 8150-2021 ORS. JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[R-1] Versus STATE REP. BY ITS THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND ANR. 7. Diary No. PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LTD. RAJESH P. 27035-2019 Versus HIMANSHU SHEKHAR[R-1] MOHIT KHIRBAT 8. SLP(C) No. MAHESH KUMAR KEJRIWAL PARTHA SIL 1761/2020 AND ANR. KUSH CHATURVEDI[CAVEAT] Versus RAMESH KUMAR KEJRIWAL AND ORS. -
REVIEW PETITION (Cr) No. of 2018 (Under Article 137 of the Constitution
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [REVIEW JURISDICTION] REVIEW PETITION (Cr) No. OF 2018 (Under Article 137 of the Constitution of India) IN WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 298 OF 2018 IN THE MATTER OF:- 1. Yashwant Sinha : …Petitioner No. 1 2. Arun Shourie …Petitioner No. 2 3. Prashant Bhushan …Petitioner No. 3 Versus 1. Central Bureau of Investigation Through it’s Director, Plot No. 5-B, 6th Floor, CGO Complex Lodhi Road, New Delhi -110003 …Respondent No. 1 2. Union of India Through it’s Cabinet Secretary Cabinet Secretariat New Delhi -110001 …Respondent No. 2 PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 137 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH ORDER XLVII OF SUPREME COURT RULES, 2013, SEEKING REVIEW OF JUDGEMENT DATED 14.12.2018 IN WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 298 OF 2018 To, THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA AND HIS COMPANION JUDGES OF THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA The Humble Petition of the Petitioners above-named MOST RESPECTFULLY SHEWETH:- 1. That the instant petition seeks review of judgement dated 14.12.2018 of the Hon’ble Court in W.P.(Cr) 298 of 2018 as the impugned judgement is based on errors apparent on the face of the record and subsequent information has come to light non consideration of which will cause grave miscarriage of justice. 2. That for the sake of brevity not all the averments in the petition in W.P. (Cr.) 298 of 2018 are reiterated herein but they may be taken as part and parcel of the present petition. (I) Errors apparent on the face of the record 3.Prayer of petitioners for registration of FIR and investigation by CBI not dealt with and instead the contract has been reviewed prematurely without the benefit of any investigation or inquiry into disputed questions of facts. -
SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 11 SCR SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY V
[2012] 11 S.C.R. 873 874 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 11 S.C.R. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY A A Ministers – A wrong judgment or an inaccurate or incorrect v. approach or poor management, by itself cannot be said to be A. RAJA a product of criminal conspiracy – In view of the materials on (Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 1688 of 2012 etc.) record, it cannot be said that Finance Minister had misused his position or conspired or colluded with the Telecom AUGUST 24, 2012 B B Minister so as to fix low entry fee by non-visiting spectrum [G.S. SINGHVI AND K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, JJ.] charges fixed in the year 2001 – No materials were made available even for a prima facie conclusion that the Finance SCAM: Minister had deliberately allowed dilution of equity of the two companies – There is also no material made available to 2G Spectrum Scam – Complaint by the appellant before C C conclude that the Finance Minister abused his official position Special Judge CBI to set in motion provisions of Prevention or used any corrupt or illegal means for obtaining any of Corruption Act, against the then Telecom Minister – During pecuniary advantage for himself or for any other person – No examination u/s. 200 Cr.P.C.,the appellant made allegation case is made out against him. that the then Finance Minister and the Telecom Minister were jointly and severely responsible for the scam – Prayer for Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Ors. etc. v. Union D D making the Finance Minister an accused and for carrying out of India and Ors. -
Politicians, Ministers and Parliamentarians Involved
The 2G spectrum scam in India involved the issue of 1232 licenses by the ruling Congress-led UPA alliance[1] of the 2G spectrum to 85 companies[1] including many new telecom companies with little or no experience in the telecom sector at a price set in the year 2001. The scam involved allegations regarding the under pricing of the 2G spectrum by the Department of Telecommunications which resulted in a heavy loss to the exchequer, and the illegal manipulation of the spectrum allocation process to favour select companies The issue came to light after the auction of airwaves for 3G services which amounted to 677,190 crore (US$151.01 billion) to the exchequer.[2] A report submitted by the Comptroller and Auditor General based on the money collected from 3G licenses estimated that the loss to the exchequer due to under pricing of the 2G spectrum was 176,379 crore (US$39.33 billion).[3] The scam came to public notice when the Supreme Court of India took Subramaniam Swamy's complaints on record [With Case type:Writ Petition (Civil),Case No:10, Year:2011].[4]All the accused have been booked under sections 120(B) (criminal conspiracy), 468 (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 471 (using as genuine a forged document or electronic record), 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property) and 109 (abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment) of the Indian Penal Code.[5] Politicians, Ministers and Parliamentarians involved: Andimuthu Raja, Union Cabinet Minister for Communications and Information Technology : The Comptroller and Auditor General holds Raja personally responsible for the sale of 2G spectrum at 2001 rates in 2008, resulting in the previously mentioned loss of up to Rs. -
Reliance Industries Companyname
COMPANY UPDATE RELIANCE INDUSTRIES Déjà vu: Downgrade in order India Equity Research| Oil, Gas and Services COMPANYNAME We turned very bullish on Reliance Industries (RIL) with our BRAVEHEART EDELWEISS 4D RATINGS ‘BUY’ in 2016; four years on and a 4x rally since, we believe the stock’s Absolute Rating HOLD primary triggers—deleveraging, asset monetisation and digital Rating Relative to Sector Outperform momentum—have played out. We also believe the pendulum has swung Risk Rating Relative to Sector Medium entirely: from extreme pessimism to exuberance, infallible expectations Sector Relative to Market Equalweight on execution and a peak analyst ‘Buy’ ratio (80%). That the valuation is pricing in overly high growth expectations when its WACC is rising and economic spread being negative suggest risks lie on the downside. This is MARKET DATA (R: RELI.BO, B: RIL IN) CMP : INR 2,146 not RIL’s first brush with euphoria: 1994 (India liberalisation), 2000 (Y2K) Target Price : INR 2,105 and 2008 (KG-D6/Refining). The current exuberance gives us a sense of déjà vu; downgrade to ‘HOLD’ with a target price of INR2,105. 52-week range (INR) : 2,163 / 867 Share in issue (mn) : 6,339.4 M cap (INR bn/USD mn) : 14,148 / 70,157 Ten-year Jio 35% CAGR, eh; high WACC; negative economic spread Avg. Daily Vol.BSE/NSE(‘000) : 11,335.2 Our two-stage reverse-DCF analysis shows the market is baking in high EPS growth, particularly for Jio Platforms (35% CAGR sustaining for ten years). We believe the SHARE HOLDING PATTERN (%) associated risk is high, and despite its strong past execution, even RIL is not infallible.