DOCSLIB.ORG

High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List HIGH COURT OF DELHI ADVANCE CAUSE LIST LIST OF BUSINESS FOR TH FRIDAY,THE 14 FEBRUARY,2014 INDEX PAGES 1. APPELLATE JURISDICTION 01 TO 33 2. SPECIAL BENCH (APPLT. SIDE) 34 TO 43 3. COMPANY JURISDICTION 44 TO 46 4. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 47 TO 60 5. REGISTRAR GENERAL/ 61 TO 74 REGISTRAR(ORGL.)/ REGISTRAR (ADMN.)/ JOINT REGISTRARS(ORGL). 14.02.2014 1 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 14.02.2014 [Note : Unless otherwise specified, before all appellate side courts, fresh matters shown in the supplementary lists will be taken up first.] COURT NO. 1 (DIVISION BENCH-1) HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW [NOTE-I: COUNSELS ARE REQUESTED TO PAGINATE THEIR FILES IN CONFORMITY WITH THE COURT FILE IN ADVANCE.] [NOTE-II: COUNSELS ARE REQUESTED TO PROVIDE LIST OF BOOKS/ACTS ON WHICH THEY ARE RELYING IN ADVANCE.] FRESH MATTERS & APPLICATIONS 1. LPA 125/2014 TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION J SAGAR ASSOCIATES,PRASHANT CM APPL. 2434/2014 LIMITED BHUSHAN CM APPL. 2435/2014 Vs. COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR CM APPL. 2436/2014 GENERAL OF INDIA AND ORS 2. LPA 144/2014 HEENA AND ANR VIKAS SHARMA,YOGESH CM APPL. 2623/2014 Vs. AUROBINDO COLLEGE ( SHARMA,SUVRAT EVENING ) AND ORS FOR ADMISSION 3. LPA 140/2014 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED AMARCHAND AND MANGALDAS AND CM APPL. 2572/2014 Vs. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF SURESH,PRASHANT CM APPL. 2573/2014 DELHI AND ORS BHUSHAN,ZUBEDA BEGUM,GAURANG CM APPL. 2574/2014 KANTH 4. LPA 141/2014 BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED AMARCHAND AND MANGALDAS AND CM APPL. 2575/2014 Vs. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF SURESH,PRASHANT BHUSHAN CM APPL. 2576/2014 DELHI AND ORS CM APPL. 2577/2014 AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS 5. LPA 434/2007 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA MR.DIGVIJAY RAI,SHARMA Vs. JEET SINGH AND ORS. ATUL,SHRUTI VERMA,MR. RAVI VERMA,MR. SANJAY PODDAR,KHAITAN AND CO. COURT NO. 2 (DIVISION BENCH-2) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL FRESH MATTERS & APPLICATIONS 1. FAO(OS) 86/2014 E-PROCUREMENT TECHNOLOGIES PT MR SUKANT VIKRAM CM APPL. 2851/2014 LTD CM APPL. 2852/2014 Vs. M/S C-1, INDIA PVT LTD AND CM APPL. 2853/2014 ANR CM APPL. 2854/2014 AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS 2. FAO(OS) 240/2013 SADA NAND AHUJA AND ORS. ATUL SHARMA AND ASSO. Vs. SUDHIR AHUJA 3. RFA(OS) 81/2013 SHRI OBAID KHAN SIDDHARTH BAMBHA,PANKAJ GUPTA CM APPL. 11328/2013 Vs. SHRI MOBEEN KHAN CM APPL. 18128/2013 4. W.P.(C) 678/2013 M/S DELHI OUTDOOR ADVERTISERS ANAND K.MISHRA,GAURANG KANTH ASSOCIATION (REGD) Vs. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR DIRECTIONS 5. FAO(OS) 355/2008 JAGDISH PRASAD MR.RAJESH RAI Vs. STATE 14.02.2014 2 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 6. FAO(OS) 196/2013 SHASHI BHUSHAN SAURABH RAJ KUMAR DUBEY AND MANISH Vs. RAHEJA DEVELOPRS LIMITED MISRA,PRAVEEN CHANDRA (Disposed-off Case) 7. FAO(OS) 204/2013 SHASHI BHUSHAN SAURABH RAJ KUMAR DUBEY AND MANISH Vs. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED MISRA,PRAVEEN CHANDRA (Disposed-off Case) 8. FAO(OS) 514/2013 REWA SHANKAR AWASTHY AND ORS RAM PRAKASH GUPTA,N S CHECHI CM APPL. 17956/2013 Vs. SADHANA SINGH AND ANR COURT NO.3 (DIVISION BENCH-3) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS 1. W.P.(C) 16258/2006 SAMBHAVANA JAI SINGH,PANKAJ CM APPL. 11400/2012 Vs. DELHI UNIVERSITY AND ORS. SINHA,S.S.AHLUWALIA,ANJU WITH W.P.(C) 8879/2008 BAGAI,RAJENDRA DHAWAN,KRISHAN (Disposed-off Case) MAHAJAN,AMITESH KUMAR,RAJ SHEKHAR,ANURAG MATHUR,AUROBINDO GHOSE,NEERAJ CHAUDHARI,SURAJ SAXENA,NAVIN CHAWLA,SHAFALI DHAWAN,ROMY CHACKO,SAMAR BANSAL,B SHANKAR BANERJEE,SAURABH BAN 2. W.P.(C) 8879/2008 ASSOCIATION FOR THE RIGHTS OF D.B. YADAV,AMITESH (Disposed-off Case) DISABLE PERSONS KUMAR,MANJET DEWAN,MANINDER Vs. DELHI UNIVERSITY ACHARYA,MONIKA GARG,NEERAJ COUDHARI,SAMAR BANSAL,RK SINGH,PRAMOD GUPTA,AS ANAND,RAVI SIKRI,SAKET SIRKI,SANJAY K PATHAK,MUSHTAQ AHMAD 3. W.P.(C) 6015/2013 MOHD. HAKIM VISHAL SEHIJPAL Vs. THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI FOR DIRECTIONS 4. LPA 812/2012 SUNIL KAPUR NANDINI SAHNI,RAKESH KUMAR CM APPL. 1330/2014 Vs. DELHI DEVELOPMENT GARG AUTHORITY AND ORS 5. LPA 270/2013 KIRTI MOHAN SAKLANI SUMATI SHARMA,JYOTI RANA Vs. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR 6. LPA 468/2013 MR. R V BHASIN KIRAN SURI AND APARNA CM APPL. 10086/2013 Vs. D D A AND ORS MATTOO,PURVESH BHUTTAN,APARNA MATTOO,N N AGGARWAL,ROHIT GANDHI COURT NO. 4 (DIVISION BENCH – 4) HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA FRESH MATTERS & APPLICATIONS 1. REVIEW PET. 61/2014 KRISHAN PAL SACHIN CHAUHAN CM APPL. 1552/2014 Vs. GNCT OF DELHI ORS. In W.P.(C) 5875/2013 (Disposed-off Case) 14.02.2014 3 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 2. W.P.(C) 1024/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR KUMAR RAJESH SINGH CM APPL. 2105/2014 Vs. SUNDER SINGH AND ORS CM APPL. 2106/2014 CM APPL. 2107/2014 3. W.P.(C) 1035/2014 ASHA SUDHANSHU TOMAR CM APPL. 2122/2014 Vs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS 4. CM APPL. 17068/2013(CM For BUDH SINGH SURJAN SINGH,S.S.ARYA,MILIND Restoration) Vs. GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI AND P. SINGH AND CM APPL. 17069/2013 ORS. ASSOCIATES,MS.HARSHA In W.P.(C) 6803/2001 ROY,POOJA KALRA (Disposed-off Case) 5. CM APPL. 12025/2013 INDIAN COUNCIL OF MR.B.S.MOR,MR. SURINDER In W.P.(C) 13021/2006 AGRICULTURAL SINGH,GS LOBANA Vs. FAIYAZ (Disposed-off Case) 6. CM APPL. 12026/2013 INDIAN COUNCIL OF MR.B.S.MOR,SURENDER In W.P.(C) 13221/2006 AGRICULTURAL SINGH,G.S.LOBANA Vs. OM PRAKASH AND ANR. (Disposed-off Case) 7. W.P.(C) 8749/2011 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GAURANG KANTH CM APPL. 19773/2011 DELHI Vs. YUSUF 8. W.P.(C) 7208/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI SONIA ARORA CM APPL. 18573/2012 Vs. PREM CHAND AND ORS. 9. W.P.(C) 7021/2013 NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL KANIKA AGNIHOTRI CM APPL. 15194/2013 Vs. MAN CHAND AND ORS FOR DIRECTION ON OFFICE NOTE 10. W.P.(C) 4261/2013 PAWAN KUMAR VIJAY SHARMA Vs. DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION CONNECTED MATTERS (ANMM)/PH. 11. W.P.(C) 8267/2011 N.RAJESH KUMAR SUKHJINDER SINGH,HIMANSHU CM APPL. 18592/2011 Vs. UOI AND ORS BAJAJ CM APPL. 19572/2011 CM APPL. 222/2012 CM APPL. 11922/2012 CM APPL. 16516/2013 12. W.P.(C) 3267/2012 M.V.BIRAJDAR SUKHJINDER SINGH,SHILPA CM APPL. 6971/2012 Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS SINGH,JAYANT CM APPL. 17176/2012 TRIPATHI,JOGINDER CM APPL. 1536/2013 SUKHEJA,RAJEEV MEHRA CM APPL. 5460/2013 CM APPL. 16664/2013 14.02.2014 4 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) COURT NO. 5 (DIVISION BENCH-5) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR NOTE: COUNSEL ARE REQUESTED TO FILE DOCUMENTS, PAPERBOOK ETC. AS FAR AS POSSIBLE, IN E-FORM AND AVOID FILING THEM IN PAPER FORM. COUNSEL ARE ALSO REQUESTED TO MAKE USE OF THE HIGH COURT WEBSITE TO ASCERTAIN THE STATUS OF PENDING MATTERS. FRESH MATTERS & APPLICATIONS 1. ITA 43/2014 NIGARA HOTELSAND BUILDERA ( P) KAVITA JHA CM APPL. 1948/2014 LTD Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS 2. W.P.(C) 6807/2012 CENTRICA INDIA OFFSHORE PVT S NANDAKUMAR LTD Vs. CIT I NEW DELHI AND ORS 3. W.P.(C) 3518/2013 SHARP GLOBAL LTD C.HARI SHANKAR,SATISH KUMAR CM APPL. 6632/2013 Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER 4. W.P.(C) 5131/2013 DEEPAK KHOSLA DEEPAK KHOSLA CM APPL. 11545/2013 Vs. HON*BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE CM APPL. 11546/2013 DELHI HIGH COURT AND ORS. CM APPL. 11547/2013 CM APPL. 14259/2013 CM APPL. 14260/2013 CM APPL. 14261/2013 5. W.P.(C) 5137/2013 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION A.J. BHAMBHANI Vs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND (A.CURIAE),ZUBEDA BEGUM,PAWAN ORS SHARMA CONNECTED MATTERS (ANMM) 6. ITA 836/2009 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BALBIR SINGH,JOHNSON WITH ITA 1038/2009 Vs. NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL BARA,SATYEN SETHI ITA 723/2011 CO-OP. MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD 7. ITA 1038/2009 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BALBIR SINGH,JOHNSON Vs. NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL BARA,SATYEN SETHI CO-OP MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD. 8. ITA 723/2011 CIT BALBIR SINGH,SATYEN SETHI Vs. NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL CO-OP MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LIMITED 9. ITA 1011/2011 CIT ANUPAM TRIPATHI WITH ITA 62/2012 Vs. CRAY RESEARCH INDIA LTD ITA 63/2012 ITA 64/2012 ITA 65/2012 10. ITA 65/2012 CIT ANUPAM TRIPATHI CM APPL. 1320/2012 Vs. CRAY RESEARCH INDIA LTD 11. ITA 62/2012 CIT ANUPAM TRIPATHI CM APPL. 1309/2012 Vs. CRAY RESEARCH INDIA LTD CM APPL. 1311/2012 WITH ITA 63/2012 ITA 64/2012 ITA 65/2012 14.02.2014 5 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 12. ITA 63/2012 CIT ANUPAM TRIPATHI CM APPL. 1312/2012 Vs. CRAY RESEARCH INDIA LTD CM APPL. 1314/2012 13. ITA 64/2012 CIT ANUPAM TRIPATHI CM APPL. 1317/2012 Vs. CRAY RESEARCH INDIA LTD CM APPL. 1319/2012 FOR FINAL HEARING 14. W.P.(C) 1608/2013 RASALIKA TRADING AND RAKESH GUPTA,SURUCHI CM APPL. 3024/2013 INVESTMENT CO. PVT. LTD AGGARWAL,ROHIT MADAN Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. FOR HEARING 15. W.P.(C) 13619/2009 INDIAN DELCO PRIVATE LIMITED PRAKASH KUMAR,SANJEEV CM APPL. 15282/2009 AND ANOTHER SABHARWAL,SALIL KAPOOR CM APPL.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Study of Reliance Jio
    International Journal of Trade & Commerce-IIARTC January-June 2017, Volume 6, No. 1 pp. 173-180 ISSN-2277-5811 (Print), 2278-9065 (Online) © SGSR. (www.sgsrjournals.co.in) All rights reserved UGC Approved Journal in Social Science Category; Journal No. 48636 COSMOS (Germany) JIF: 4.242; ISRA JIF: 3.957; NAAS Rating 3.55; ISI JIF: 3.721 New Era in Telecommunication- The Study of Reliance Jio B. Kumar Faculty of Commerce & Business Administration, Meerut College, Meerut (U.P), India E-mail Id: [email protected] Abstract PAPER/ARTICLE INFO Being world’s second largest population of 1.2 billion, India is a young RECEIVED ON: 11/03/2017 nation with 63% of its population under the age of 35 years. It has a fast ACCEPTED ON: 16/05/2017 growing digital audience with 800 million mobile connections and over 200 million internet users. Reliance thoroughly believes in India’s Reference to this paper potential to lead the world with its capabilities in innovation. Towards should be made as follows: that end, Reliance envisages creation of a digital revolution in India. Reliance Jio aims to enable this transformation by creating not just a B. Kumar (2017), ―New Era cutting-edge voice and broadband network, but also a powerful eco-system in Telecommunication- The on which a range of rich digital services will be enabled – a unique green- Study of Reliance Jio‖, Int. J. field opportunity. of Trade and Commerce- The three-pronged focus on broadband networks, affordable smart phones IIARTC, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. and the availability of rich content and applications has enabled Jio to 173-180 create an integrated business strategy from the very beginning, and today, Jio is capable of offering a unique combination of telecom, high speed data, digital commerce, media and payment services.
    [Show full text]
  • Lokpal and Good Governance Pjaee, 17 (7) (2020)
    LOKPAL AND GOOD GOVERNANCE PJAEE, 17 (7) (2020) LOKPAL AND GOOD GOVERNANCE Parishkar Shreshth Research Scholar, Amity University, Lucknow Campus. Lucknow, U.P. – 226028 Email ID: [email protected] Parishkar Shreshth. LOKPAL AND GOOD GOVERNANCE--Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology 17(7), 11030-11037. ISSN 1567-214x Keywords: Lokpal Bill, Governance, Corruption. Abstract We have not received an adequate benefit from the government for decades since our independence. India is now a young country that is at a transitional stage. Today citizens of India want to utilise all the resources and opportunities most productively. So, good governance is mandatory for total development. Because of the uncertainty about India's country, it is possible only a Lokpal like institution can change peoples' minds about development. We are waiting for a major positive change. Corruption in India is a major concern and is a detriment to the economy. According to research, the bulk of public corruption is financed by a government programme. Now voters in India appreciate the value of their vote. They usually call for the development of a system to reduce corruption. The Lokpal bill against corruption is a good tool, but its implementation has been held back because of a lack of enthusiasm and disappointment. The purpose of this study is to understand voters' thoughts and feelings about the Lokpal bill. This paper highlights the significant issues of Lokpal and its impact on governance. Introduction Governance is a Human concept. There is an important discussion about governance taking place right now. Usually, governance refers to the tasks of running the government.
    [Show full text]
  • Has the Judiciary Turned Its Back on the Poor?
    HAS THE JUDICIARY TURNED ITS BACK ON THE POOR? A Report on the Seminar 4th November 2006 At Indian Society for International Law 9, Bhagwan Dass Raod, New Delhi A film by Ruzbeh N.Barucha – “yamuna gently weeps” was shown in the beginning of the seminar. The film was very emotive and reflected the trauma the oustees have undergone in Yamuna Pushta Demolition drive ordered by the Delhi High Court in January 2004. Welcome by Shri Prashant Bhushan, Advocate, Supreme Court However, it was a very powerful film as we saw just now. There was a time, not so long ago, when the Supreme Court of India waxed eloquent about the Fundamental right to life and liberty guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution to include all that it takes to lead a decent and dignified life. They thus held that the right to life includes the right to food, the right to employment and the right to shelter: in other words, the right to all the necessities of life. All that seems a distant dream now, given the recent role of the courts in not just failing to protect the rights of the poor that they had themselves declared not long ago, but in fact spearheading the massive assault on the poor, particularly since the era of economic liberalisation. This is happening in case after case, whether they are of the tribal oustees of the Narmada Dam, or the urban slum dwellers whose homes were being ruthlessly bulldozed without notice and without rehabilitation. Similarly, the hawkers of Delhi and Mumbai have been evicted from the streets pursuant to the orders of the court.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Post Purchase Behaviour of Jio Phone with Reference to Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd Doddaballapura”
    PROJECT REPORT (17MBAPR407) “A Study on post purchase behaviour of Jio phone with reference to Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd Doddaballapura” BY Nagesh P USN: 1AY17MBA31 Submitted to VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, BELAGAVI In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Under the guidance of INTERNAL GUIDE EXTERNAL GUIDE Dr. Nijaguna G Mr. Rakesh Panchavoli NS Professor Point Manager Dept of MBA, AIT Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd Doddaballapura Department of MBA Acharya Institute of technology, Soldevanahalli, Hesaragatta Main Road, Bengaluru March2019 ... ....... .. .. .... .... .... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... .. ... ........ e ... .............. ..................................................... .. .. .. ...... .. ....... .................... ....... ............. ....... .... .. ......................... .. ................... ............. .. Place: Bengaluru Date:23/03/2019 Certificate This is to certify that Mr. NAGESH P student of final year MBA bearing USN No lAYl 7MBA31, student of Acharya Institute of technology, Bangalore, affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi, he has successfully completed his internship project titled "A STUDY ON POST PURCHASE BEHAVIOUR OF JIO PHONE AT RELIENCE JIO INFOCOM LTD DODDBALLAPURA" starting from 03- 01 -2019 to 16-02-2019. During the period of his Project program with us he was found punctual, hardworking and his character was satisfactory. This project on evaluation fulfills all the stated criteria and the student's
    [Show full text]
  • Reaching for the Stars: the Incredible Rise of Arvind Kejriwal Vidya Subrahmaniam Feb 25, 2015
    Reaching for the Stars: The Incredible Rise of Arvind Kejriwal Vidya Subrahmaniam Feb 25, 2015 Arvind Kejriwal, Chief Minister of Delhi. - FILE PHOTO: SHANKER CHAKRAVARTY Five years ago, Arvind Kejriwal was far from being the man of the masses he is today. The Hindu Centre's Senior Fellow Vidya Subrahmaniam, who as a correspondent with The Hindu followed Kejriwal's public life between 2006 and 2014, traces his rise from activism to political stardom. In the immediate afterglow of the Assembly election, everyone seemed to be smiling in Delhi. A friend out on his morning walk found strangers congratulating him on the Aam Aadmi Party’s (AAP’s) superhero-sized victory. He returned the compliment, aware that like him, they were ordinary citizens basking in the reflected glory of Arvind Kejriwal’s brilliantly executed electoral coup. As results poured in, television anchors, across channels, briefly forgot to be officious. The incorrigibly rude Arnab Goswami attempted poetry and watched bemusedly as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) spokesperson and his counterpart in the AAP warred and sparred in shayari (Urdu poetry). Visuals suggested a carnival-like mood on the streets. Delhi did not erupt in such sheer joy even when the BJP’s Narendra Modi broke a 30-year jinx to win a majority in the 2014 Lok Sabha election. The emotional, spontaneous response was reminiscent of 1977, when the all-new Janata Party unseated Indira Gandhi after the Emergency. The AAP’s victory was the sweeter for having come in the most exacting circumstances. Kejriwal had ceased to be Kejriwal since quitting as Delhi’s Chief Minister in February 2014 — after only 49 days in office.
    [Show full text]
  • AAP Rebel Leader Prashant Bhushan Has Written Wrote an Open Letter To
    AAP rebel leader Prashant Bhushan has written wrote an open letter to AAP Supremo, Arvind Kejriwal comparing Kejriwal with Russian leader Stalin in allegged dictatorial attitude . Bhushan said: "God and history will not forgive what you are doing to the party." The full text of his letter to Kejriwal is as under : Dear Arvind, In the National Council meeting held on the March 28, in your Convenor's address, instead of giving a review of the party's situation and the path ahead, you chose to launch an attack on Yogendra Ji, my father and me, making all sorts of false and inflammatory allegations against us. Your speech incited several Delhi MLAs- (who were invited despite not being members of the NC) to scream that we were "gaddars" who should be thrown out, and behave in the manner of hooligans. Such was the ferocity of the mob of these MLAs and others as they rushed towards my father, that he felt that he may not get out of this alive. You did not even allow us to respond to your allegations. Immediately after your speech, in the middle of shouting and screaming by MLAs and others, Manish read out a resolution for our removal (without any chair, and without anyone allowing him to do so). He then proceeded to call for vote by show of hands without allowing any discussion, forcing us to walk out of what had clearly become a farce. It was farcical for many reasons: Many members of the NC had not been invited or allowed to attend; more than half the people inside the meeting hall were non-members, which included MLAs, district and State convenors of four states, volunteers and bouncers; there was no orderly conduct of the proceedings for many reasons, including the hooliganism displayed by many people there; no independent videography was allowed, the party's Lokpal was not allowed, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of India Notice
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA NOTICE IN CONTINUATION OF NOTICE DATED 6TH JULY, 2021, TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT THE MATTERS CONTAINED IN THE LIST APPENDED BELOW ARE ALSO LIKELY TO BE LISTED BEFORE THE HON©BLE COURTS ON 8TH JULY, 2021(THURSDAY) OR THEREAFTER. DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2021 sd/- ADDL. REGISTRAR (DEU) TO ALL CONCERNED Sl. Case No. Title Advocate Name No. @ DiaryNo. 1. Crl.A. No. VIVEK KUMAR @ KARI RISHI MALHOTRA[P-1] 532/2019 Versus DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1] THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. SLP(Crl) SHAHID IQBAL KHAN HIREN DASAN No. Versus NIRANJANA SINGH[R-1], 5371/2019 THE STATE OF BIHAR AND GAURAV AGRAWAL[R-2], [R-3], ORS. [R-4] 3. SLP(Crl) SAGIRAJU RANGA RAJU NILOFAR KHAN No. Versus 5556/2020 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. 4. W.P.(Crl.) SAUDAMINI SAHOO RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL No. 3/2021 Versus ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], CENTRAL BUREAU OF E. C. AGRAWALA[R-2] INVESTIGATION AND ANR. 5. SLP(Crl) MANOJ KUMAR SURABHI SANCHITA No. Versus VINOD KUMAR TEWARI[R-1], 2013/2021 SUNNY KUMAR @ MONU AND D. K. DEVESH[R-2], [R-2] ANR. 6. Diary No. K. MURUGANANDAM AND T. ARCHANA[P-1] 8150-2021 ORS. JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[R-1] Versus STATE REP. BY ITS THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND ANR. 7. Diary No. PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LTD. RAJESH P. 27035-2019 Versus HIMANSHU SHEKHAR[R-1] MOHIT KHIRBAT 8. SLP(C) No. MAHESH KUMAR KEJRIWAL PARTHA SIL 1761/2020 AND ANR. KUSH CHATURVEDI[CAVEAT] Versus RAMESH KUMAR KEJRIWAL AND ORS.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW PETITION (Cr) No. of 2018 (Under Article 137 of the Constitution
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [REVIEW JURISDICTION] REVIEW PETITION (Cr) No. OF 2018 (Under Article 137 of the Constitution of India) IN WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No. 298 OF 2018 IN THE MATTER OF:- 1. Yashwant Sinha : …Petitioner No. 1 2. Arun Shourie …Petitioner No. 2 3. Prashant Bhushan …Petitioner No. 3 Versus 1. Central Bureau of Investigation Through it’s Director, Plot No. 5-B, 6th Floor, CGO Complex Lodhi Road, New Delhi -110003 …Respondent No. 1 2. Union of India Through it’s Cabinet Secretary Cabinet Secretariat New Delhi -110001 …Respondent No. 2 PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 137 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH ORDER XLVII OF SUPREME COURT RULES, 2013, SEEKING REVIEW OF JUDGEMENT DATED 14.12.2018 IN WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 298 OF 2018 To, THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA AND HIS COMPANION JUDGES OF THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA The Humble Petition of the Petitioners above-named MOST RESPECTFULLY SHEWETH:- 1. That the instant petition seeks review of judgement dated 14.12.2018 of the Hon’ble Court in W.P.(Cr) 298 of 2018 as the impugned judgement is based on errors apparent on the face of the record and subsequent information has come to light non consideration of which will cause grave miscarriage of justice. 2. That for the sake of brevity not all the averments in the petition in W.P. (Cr.) 298 of 2018 are reiterated herein but they may be taken as part and parcel of the present petition. (I) Errors apparent on the face of the record 3.Prayer of petitioners for registration of FIR and investigation by CBI not dealt with and instead the contract has been reviewed prematurely without the benefit of any investigation or inquiry into disputed questions of facts.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 11 SCR SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY V
    [2012] 11 S.C.R. 873 874 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 11 S.C.R. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY A A Ministers – A wrong judgment or an inaccurate or incorrect v. approach or poor management, by itself cannot be said to be A. RAJA a product of criminal conspiracy – In view of the materials on (Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 1688 of 2012 etc.) record, it cannot be said that Finance Minister had misused his position or conspired or colluded with the Telecom AUGUST 24, 2012 B B Minister so as to fix low entry fee by non-visiting spectrum [G.S. SINGHVI AND K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, JJ.] charges fixed in the year 2001 – No materials were made available even for a prima facie conclusion that the Finance SCAM: Minister had deliberately allowed dilution of equity of the two companies – There is also no material made available to 2G Spectrum Scam – Complaint by the appellant before C C conclude that the Finance Minister abused his official position Special Judge CBI to set in motion provisions of Prevention or used any corrupt or illegal means for obtaining any of Corruption Act, against the then Telecom Minister – During pecuniary advantage for himself or for any other person – No examination u/s. 200 Cr.P.C.,the appellant made allegation case is made out against him. that the then Finance Minister and the Telecom Minister were jointly and severely responsible for the scam – Prayer for Centre for Public Interest Litigation and Ors. etc. v. Union D D making the Finance Minister an accused and for carrying out of India and Ors.
    [Show full text]
  • High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List
    HIGH COURT OF DELHI ADVANCE CAUSE LIST LIST OF BUSINESS FOR TH FRIDAY,THE 29 NOVEMBER,2013 INDEX PAGES 1. APPELLATE JURISDICTION 01 TO 36 2. SPECIAL BENCH (APPLT. SIDE) 37 TO 41 3. COMPANY JURISDICTION 42 TO 42 4. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 43 TO 55 5. REGISTRAR GENERAL/ 56 TO 70 REGISTRAR(ORGL.)/ REGISTRAR (ADMN.)/ JOINT REGISTRARS(ORGL). 29.11.2013 1 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 29.11.2013 [Note : Unless otherwise specified, before all appellate side courts, fresh matters shown in the supplementary lists will be taken up first.] COURT NO. 1 (DIVISION BENCH-1) HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN [NOTE-I: COUNSELS ARE REQUESTED TO PAGINATE THEIR FILES IN CONFORMITY WITH THE COURT FILE IN ADVANCE.] [NOTE-II: COUNSELS ARE REQUESTED TO PROVIDE LIST OF BOOKS/ACTS ON WHICH THEY ARE RELYING IN ADVANCE.] AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS 1. CM APPL. 18244/2013 SHIVAM SHRESTHI THR HIS DR VIJENDRA MAHNDIYAN AND In LPA 714/2013 FATHER SHIVESH CHANDRA ASSOCIATES,DR N K SHRESTHI KHETRAPAL,ZUBEDA BEGUM Vs. DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, DELHI FOR DIRECTIONS 2. W.P.(C) 5937/2010 B. MAHESH SHARMA NISHA BHAMBHANI,ANJANA Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS GOSAIN,AMITESH KUMAR,AMIT SHARMA,ARUNAV PATNAIK,ALY MIRZA AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS FOR FINAL HEARING (END) 3. W.P.(C) 2176/2010 APEX CHAMBER OF COMMERCE S K DUBEY,SANJEEV KUMAR WITH W.P.(C) 2885/2010 Vs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI DUBEY,ANJUM JAVED W.P.(C) 5590/2011 4. W.P.(C) 2885/2010 GENERAL EMPLOYEES WELFARE DEEPAK DEWAN,ANJUM JAVED ASSOCIATION Vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Politicians, Ministers and Parliamentarians Involved
    The 2G spectrum scam in India involved the issue of 1232 licenses by the ruling Congress-led UPA alliance[1] of the 2G spectrum to 85 companies[1] including many new telecom companies with little or no experience in the telecom sector at a price set in the year 2001. The scam involved allegations regarding the under pricing of the 2G spectrum by the Department of Telecommunications which resulted in a heavy loss to the exchequer, and the illegal manipulation of the spectrum allocation process to favour select companies The issue came to light after the auction of airwaves for 3G services which amounted to 677,190 crore (US$151.01 billion) to the exchequer.[2] A report submitted by the Comptroller and Auditor General based on the money collected from 3G licenses estimated that the loss to the exchequer due to under pricing of the 2G spectrum was 176,379 crore (US$39.33 billion).[3] The scam came to public notice when the Supreme Court of India took Subramaniam Swamy's complaints on record [With Case type:Writ Petition (Civil),Case No:10, Year:2011].[4]All the accused have been booked under sections 120(B) (criminal conspiracy), 468 (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 471 (using as genuine a forged document or electronic record), 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property) and 109 (abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment) of the Indian Penal Code.[5] Politicians, Ministers and Parliamentarians involved: Andimuthu Raja, Union Cabinet Minister for Communications and Information Technology : The Comptroller and Auditor General holds Raja personally responsible for the sale of 2G spectrum at 2001 rates in 2008, resulting in the previously mentioned loss of up to Rs.
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical List of Persons for Whom Recommendations Were Received for Padma Awards - 2015
    Alphabetical List of Persons for whom recommendations were received for Padma Awards - 2015 Sl. No. Name 1. Shri Aashish 2. Shri P. Abraham 3. Ms. Sonali Acharjee 4. Ms. Triveni Acharya 5. Guru Shashadhar Acharya 6. Shri Gautam Navnitlal Adhikari 7. Dr. Sunkara Venkata Adinarayana Rao 8. Shri Pankaj Advani 9. Shri Lal Krishna Advani 10. Dr. Devendra Kumar Agarwal 11. Shri Madan Mohan Agarwal 12. Dr. Nand Kishore Agarwal 13. Dr. Vinay Kumar Agarwal 14. Dr. Shekhar Agarwal 15. Dr. Sanjay Agarwala 16. Smt. Raj Kumari Aggarwal 17. Ms. Preety Aggarwal 18. Dr. S.P. Aggarwal 19. Dr. (Miss) Usha Aggarwal 20. Shri Vinod Aggarwal 21. Shri Jaikishan Aggarwal 22. Dr. Pratap Narayan Agrawal 23. Shri Badriprasad Agrawal 24. Dr. Sudhir Agrawal 25. Shri Vishnu Kumar Agrawal 26. Prof. (Dr.) Sujan Agrawal 27. Dr. Piyush C. Agrawal 28. Shri Subhash Chandra Agrawal 29. Dr. Sarojini Agrawal 30. Shri Sushiel Kumar Agrawal 31. Shri Anand Behari Agrawal 32. Dr. Varsha Agrawal 33. Dr. Ram Autar Agrawal 34. Shri Gopal Prahladrai Agrawal 35. Shri Anant Agrawal 36. Prof. Afroz Ahmad 37. Prof. Afzal Ahmad 38. Shri Habib Ahmed 39. Dr. Siddeek Ahmed Haji Panamtharayil 40. Dr. Ranjan Kumar Akhaury 41. Ms. Uzma Akhtar 42. Shri Eshan Akhtar 43. Shri Vishnu Akulwar 44. Shri Bruce Alberts 45. Captain Abbas Ali 46. Dr. Mohammed Ali 47. Dr. Govardhan Aliseri 48. Dr. Umar Alisha 49. Dr. M. Mohan Alva 50. Shri Mohammed Amar 51. Shri Gangai Amaren 52. Smt. Sindhutai Ramchandra Ambike 53. Mata Amritanandamayi 54. Dr. Manjula Anagani 55. Shri Anil Kumar Anand 56.
    [Show full text]