DOCSLIB.ORG

Born in 1769, by the Age of 10 Thomas Lawrence Was Already Showing Remarkable Artistic Ability. Our Expert, Amina Wright, Explor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Born in 1769, by the Age of 10 Thomas Lawrence Was Already Showing Remarkable Artistic Ability. Our Expert, Amina Wright, Explor BY ARTS SOCIETY LECTURER AMINA WRIGHT Born in 1769, by the age of 10 Thomas Lawrence was already showing remarkable artistic ability. Our expert, Amina Wright, explores the story of the boy that went on to become president of the Royal Academy of Arts 1. PORTRAIT OF THE ARTIST AS A YOUNG PRODIGY The portrait painter Thomas Lawrence first came to public attention as a boy in the 1770s, when his father kept a superior coaching inn, the Black Bear at Devizes, Wiltshire. Travelling from London to the fashionable spa town of Bath, the novelist, diarist and playwright Fanny Burney was one of many famous guests at the Bear; stopping there in 1780 she found the innkeeper’s family to be well read and musically gifted. Their youngest son, Thomas, was ‘a most lovely boy of 10 years of age, who seems to be not merely the wonder of their family, but of the times for his astonishing skill in drawing'. The actor David Garrick, a regular at the Bear, was equally impressed by Tommy’s acting skills and he foresaw his future success ‘poised between the pencil and the stage’. The child regularly attended performances at the Theatre Royal in Bath with his father, an aspiring thespian and poet who would return actors’ hospitality in the green room with a welcome at the Bear. This ensured that Lawrence’s reputation as a rising star spread through the literary and artistic networks of Bath and Wiltshire. Head of Minerva Drawn at Oxford by Master Lawrence at the Age of 11 Years (1779) 2. STRIKING LIKENESSES Days after Thomas’s 11th birthday, his father announced the failure of his inn- keeping business. Suddenly homeless, the family had to find a new source of income. Lawrence and his father had spent the previous autumn in Oxford, where they found generous patrons among the fellows of the university. This fancy head of Minerva is typical of the little drawings Lawrence was selling at this time. Although the classically inspired composition has the appearance of an antique intaglio, it is actually an unidealised profile dressed up in a theatrical costume, with careful attention given to the reflective surfaces of the chased armour and helmet. Lawrence seems to be taking delight in discovering the variations of texture that a graphite pencil can produce. It would be at least a year before the young artist would find the confidence to abandon profile and allow his sitters to relax into more natural poses. The trip to Oxford was evidently successful enough for Lawrence’s father to realise his son’s potential as a gold mine. By November 1780 the family had settled in Bath, where he regularly advertised his young son’s services to ‘the Nobility and Gentry’ as a swift, reliable and charming maker of ‘Striking Sketches of their Likenesses’. Master Lawrence, an engraving by JK Sherwin, in 1781, probably after William Hoare 3. PERSONS OF THE FIRST DISTINCTION Lawrence spent the next six years in Bath perfecting his drawing in pencil and mastering the art of pastel painting, then a very popular medium for portraits. It offered all the colour and texture of oil paint, but none of the inconvenient drying time. Through a combination of clever publicity (much of it by word of mouth), celebrity endorsement from the actors and literati of his father’s circle, and a convenient location opposite the New Assembly Rooms, Lawrence was able to find as much work as his parents needed to keep the family comfortable. But perhaps the most important element in his success was not so much his father’s ambition, as his own mature and charismatic personality. Anecdotes speak of the lad as a welcome guest in some of Bath’s most elegant drawing rooms, copying Old Masters in the city’s finest private collections and charming the Duchess of Devonshire. His greatest champions were the female artists and writers of the Bluestocking Circle (several of whom were neighbours of the Lawrence household) and the actress Sarah Siddons. Lawrence’s portrait of Siddons as the tragic heroine Zara secured his reputation in London, just as she was taking Drury Lane by storm. Unfinished Portrait of a Young Girl, c.1790 4. REFINING HIS TECHNIQUE When Lawrence was 17 he settled in ‘a suite of handsome apartments over a pastrycook’s shop’ in London’s Leicester Square, close to the house of Sir Joshua Reynolds, the founding president of the Royal Academy. Sir Joshua was one of many influential mentors and patrons who encouraged the young artist to develop his oil painting technique. As a painter, Lawrence quickly reached a remarkable level of competence. His method of working in oil was an unusual and painstaking one, firmly rooted in his confidence as a draughtsman. He would spend the first day sketching in chalk directly onto a light-coloured ground, only to paint over his underdrawing with lines of liquid paint. Then he would gradually build up areas of colour, beginning with the face. He contrived his paintings so that they appeared to have been dashed off with ease and panache, giving the finished portrait an exceptional immediacy and spontaneity. Although Lawrence has, not unreasonably, been accused of flattering his subjects with slender poses and sumptuous textiles, and of using intense colour and highlighting to make eyes brighter and lips fuller, his real passion was for ‘expressing with truth the human heart in the traits of the countenance'. Elizabeth Farren, Later Countess of Derby, 1790 5. COMING OF AGE It was this combination of qualities that made the artist such a sensation at the Royal Academy exhibitions of the late 1780s and early 1790s. In 1790, on the eve of Lawrence’s 21st birthday, his father wrote to an old Wiltshire patron bursting with pride and gratitude at ‘the great name my son has so wonderfully acquired’. The Royal Academy’s annual exhibition had just opened with no fewer than 12 works by Lawrence, the most notable being a sensitive full-length portrait of Queen Charlotte (now in the National Gallery), at a time when she was still recovering from the shock of her husband George III’s sudden ‘madness’ and gradual return to health. Lawrence had painted it during a three-month residence at Windsor Castle. The Queen’s portrait had a rival in another outstanding full-length, as bright and energetic as Her Majesty’s was wistful, of the comic actress Elizabeth Farren. Lawrence went on to be elected president of the Royal Academy in 1820 and to be one of the most influential men of his time. When he died, exhausted at the age of 60, he was honoured with burial in St Paul’s Cathedral. Yet it’s interesting to note that, in April 2019, the 250th anniversary of his birth passed silently without national celebration. Such is the fickleness of fashion. AMINA'S TOP TIPS Books to read Michael Levey’s Sir Thomas Lawrence (Yale University Press, 2005) is the definitive survey of the artist’s life and work My book, Thomas Lawrence: Coming of Age (Philip Wilson, 2020), celebrates the West Country boy’s early years until the age of 25, and his experience of growing up an artist Where to see works Some of Lawrence’s earliest drawings, pastels and paintings will be returning to Bath early next year in the exhibition Thomas Lawrence 1780-1794: Coming of Age at the Holburne Museum (9 January to 3 May 2021). If you can’t wait until then, the best place to see Lawrence’s later work this autumn is at Windsor Castle’s extraordinary Waterloo Chamber, packed from floor to ceiling with 20 of his late masterpieces. Lawrence was so prolific and his portraits so popular well into the 20th century that you won’t have to travel far to find them reproduced in engravings and photographic prints, or on old biscuit tins, china and chocolate boxes. Try browsing online or in charity shops for some Lawrence-inspired kitsch. OUR EXPERT'S STORY Amina Wright is a curator of historic art collections, exhibitions and interiors, formerly for English Heritage and the Holburne Museum in Bath, and now as senior curator of the Faith Museum at The Auckland Project, County Durham. She has published and lectured for The Arts Society on the artists of Georgian Bath, including Thomas Gainsborough, Joseph Wright of Derby and Sir Thomas Lawrence. Amina recently completed an MA in Christianity and the Arts at King's College London, with a study of images of St Joseph, the basis of her popular lecture Joseph of Nazareth: Best Supporting Actor. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Artists` Picture Rooms in Eighteenth-Century Bath
    ARTISTS' PICTURE ROOMS IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY BATH Susan Legouix Sloman In May 1775 David Garrick described to Hannah More the sense of well­ being he experienced in Bath: 'I do this, & do that, & do Nothing, & I go here and go there and go nowhere-Such is ye life of Bath & such the Effects of this place upon me-I forget my Cares, & my large family in London, & Every thing ... '. 1 The visitor to Bath in the second half of the eighteenth century had very few decisions to make once he was safely installed in his lodgings. A well-established pattern of bathing, drinking spa water, worship, concert and theatre-going and balls meant that in the early and later parts of each day he was likely to be fully occupied. However he was free to decide how to spend the daylight hours between around lOam when the company generally left the Pump Room and 3pm when most people retired to their lodgings to dine. Contemporary diaries and journals suggest that favourite daytime pursuits included walking on the parades, carriage excursions, visiting libraries (which were usually also bookshops), milliners, toy shops, jewellers and artists' showrooms and of course, sitting for a portrait. At least 160 artists spent some time working in Bath in the eighteenth century,2 a statistic which indicates that sitting for a portrait was indeed one of the most popular activities. Although he did not specifically have Bath in mind, Thomas Bardwell noted in 1756, 'It is well known, that no Nation in the World delights so much in Face-painting, or gives so generous Encouragement to it as our own'.3 In 1760 the Bath writer Daniel Webb noted 'the extraordinary passion which the English have for portraits'.4 Andre Rouquet in his survey of The Present State of the Arts in England of 1755 described how 'Every portrait painter in England has a room to shew his pictures, separate from that in which he works.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dispersal and Formation of Sir Thomas Lawrence's Collection
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-55133-5 - The Drawings of Michelangelo and his Followers in the Ashmolean Museum Paul Joannides Excerpt More information the dispersal and formation of sir thomas lawrence’s collection of drawings by michelangelo i. the dispersal from Michelangelo apart – in its essentials has not changed since 1846, although one sheet of drawings hitherto In 1846 the University of Oxford acquired, through the placed in the Raphael school is here included as a copy generosity of a number of benefactors but supremely that after Michelangelo – an identification, indeed, made in of Lord Eldon, a large number of drawings by, attributed 1830 but subsequently overlooked.5 to, or associated with Michelangelo and Raphael. Put The two series that came to Oxford were the remains on display in the University Galleries were fifty-three of two much larger series of drawings, both owned by mountings of drawings associated with Michelangelo, and the man who has clear claim to be the greatest of all 137 by Raphael.1 Some of these mountings comprised English collectors of Old Master Drawings: Sir Thomas two or more drawings and the overall total of individual Lawrence. It is Lawrence’s collection that provided all drawings was somewhat larger.2 This exhibition and – the drawings by, and most of those after, Michelangelo consequently – its catalogue included most, but not the now in the Ashmolean Museum. Lawrence, himself a totality, of the drawings by these artists offered for sale fine draughtsman, whose precision and skill in this area
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins and Nature of Romanticism This Evening I Want To
    The Origins and Nature of Romanticism This evening I want to say something about the origin and nature of romanticism. Generally speaking, it would be fair to conclude, it seems to me, that the neo-classical movement was official, conservative and in its later phases actively reactionary in the rigidity of its rules, though must qualify this by observing that early neo-classical architectural theory and practice gave birth to the modern theory of functionalism, so important for the twentieth century, and neo-classical paining in France under David gave birth to realism, so important for nineteenth century French painting. There can be no doubt that after 1815 the Romantic movement expressed the tensions and mood of the new age more profoundly than Neo-classicism. ‘To say the word Romanticism is to say modern art—that is, intimacy, spirituality, colour, aspiration towards the infinite, expressed by every means available to the arts’ wrote Baudelaire in his critical review of the Salon of 1846. ‘For me, Romanticism is the most recent, the latest expression of the beautiful’. The sources of romanticism lie outside of art itself and I shall not discuss them in detail, for they are often discussed. The rise of popular democracy, of industrialism, and of capitalism, changed utterly the artist’s relation to society. He importance of his old patrons the church, the court, the nobility declined swiftly. In the new situation the artist became an individualist forced to rely upon himself. Romanticism was the consequence of the new situation. It was not a style like Gothic or Baroque (this is important to grasp at once) not a style but as Baudelaire says ‘a mode of feeling’.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Queen Charlotte Black? | the Hook - Charlottesville's Weekly News
    Was Queen Charlotte black? | The Hook - Charlottesville's weekly news... http://www.readthehook.com/98341/cover-was-queen-charlotte-black COVER STORIES Was Queen Charlotte black? By VIRGINIA DAUGHERTY Published online Thursday Feb 2nd, 2006 and in print issue #0505 dated Thursday Feb 2nd, 2006 Was Queen Charlotte, our city's namesake, black? Her African heritage is part of the legends and facts that cling to the petite German woman who married "mad King George" and who inspired not only Charlotte, North Carolina, but at least eight other places in North America– including our town. Although she was German, Charlotte was directly descended from Margarita de Castro y Sousa, a member of the black branch of the Portuguese royal house. Whether her lineage affected her appearance is contested. Historian Mario de Valdes y Cocom says that her features, as seen in royal portraits, were conspicuously "negroid" and reports that they were noted by numerous contemporaries including the queen's personal physician, Baron Stockmar, who described her at age 84 as "small and crooked, with a true mulatto face." Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, explains that Charlotte's ancestor, Margarita de Castro, descended from Portuguese monarch Alfonso III and his mistress, Mourana Gil, an African of Moorish descent. The Wikipedia blog contains an ongoing argument, with one blogger writing, "This is precisely the kind of thing historians would love to cover up." Another objects, "The whole 'Queen Charlotte was black' thing is total garbage." A third answers, "It's apparent that racist sentiments seem to find their way into the simplist [sic] of argume nts." "An African ancestry doesn't mean she's black." "It is actually quite certain that all European royalty has a slight amount of black ancestry." And so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Adviser's Statement.Pdf
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Brief Description of item Watercolour by John Martin (1789-1854) (b. Heydon Bridge, Northumberland, d. Douglas, Isle of Man), The Destruction of Pharaoh’s Host, signed and dated: ‘J. Martin/1836’ (lower right) Pencil and watercolour with gum arabic heightened with bodycolour and with scratching out; 23 x 33 ¾ in. (584 x 857 mm) (No condition report provided) The watercolour illustrates the passage in Exodus, 14:26-31, when the Lord instructed Moses to stretch out his hand to release the waters and drown the Egyptians pursuing the fleeing Israelites across the Red Sea which had been miraculously parted to allow them passage: And the waters returned, and covered the chariots and the horsemen, and all the host of Pharaoh that came into the sea after them; and there remained not so much as one of them. But the children of Israel walked upon dry land in the midst of the sea; and the waters were a wall unto them on the right hand, and on their left. Moses stands on a promontory on the right of the image, commanding the waters, accompanied by the saved Israelites. Employing a panoramic composition to magnificent effect, Martin exaggerates the scale of the waves by sketching in the massed crowds of Israelites along the coast to the right and by diminishing the size of the drowning figures, horses and chariots, and two pyramids on the horizon. A blood red sunset below a sweeping black sky symbolizing mass death and retribution looms over the Red Sea. 2. Context Provenance and Prices (Probably) J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Portraits and Sporting Pictures
    ROYAL PORTRAITS AND SPORTING PICTURES FROM THE COLLECTIONS OF THEIR EXCELLENCIES THE GOVERNOR GENERAL AND LADY NORRIE AUCKLAND C TY ART GAL :RY ROYAL PORTRAITS AND SPORTING PICTURES FROM THE COLLECTIONS OF THEIR EXCELLENCIES THE GOVERNOR GENERAL AND LADY NORRIE AUCKLAND CITY ART GALLERY during the FESTIVAL OF THE ARTS 1955 HIS is ONE OF THE RARE OCCASIONS when the general public > is given the opportunity or seeing a well chosen and well > balanced private collection or valuable pictures, which in the ' ordinary course of things would not be seen outside an English country house. So what a great pleasure, as well as a privilege, it is for us in Auckland to be allowed to see this selection of royal portraits and sporting pictures from the collections of Their Excellencies the Governor- General and Lady Norrie. A private collection should reflect its owner; and that is exactly what the collection now being exhibited does. Even if we knew nothing previously of the special interests of Their Excellencies, we would be aware immediately from these works, of Their Excellencies' deep love of British history and those activities of country life which have played such an important part in forming the character of rural England. The paintings which form part of these collections demonstrate also the artistic judgment and taste of Their Excellencies, for all of them have been chosen not only for the personages and events represented, but for their qualities as works of art as well. Their Excellencies' pictures have not been exhibited previously in New Zealand, and Auckland feels proud that the exhibition should form part of its 1955 Festival of the Arts, which has already become a dominant feature in the life of our City.
    [Show full text]
  • Casting Presence the Death Mask of Sir Thomas Lawrence As a Site of Remembrance
    Casting Presence The death mask of Sir Thomas Lawrence as a site of remembrance Emily Knight Formerly University of Oxford, United Kingdom ABSTRACT – When Sir Thomas Lawrence died in 1830, plaster casts were made of his face and right hand. The death mask was placed inside a wooden box with a lid that contained a mezzotint of the artist in life, his chalk, stubs, pencil, and a lock of his hair. This curious collection of objects formed a temporal bridge from past to present, operating as a site of remembrance that surpassed mere physical description. The experience of lifting a lid filled with traces of the artist’s life to reveal the death mask concealed beneath, presented the viewer with the absolute and unalterable finality of death. The various elements that contribute to the presentation of Lawrence’s death mask declare his existence through trace, touch and abject remains. They mark the point at which commemoration and deified celebration made way for a more encompassing and personal memorial on the brink of the Victorian Age. This article will discuss this key moment in early nineteenth-century visual culture, before photography emerged as the predominant mode of automatic reproduction. It will consider how this process of remembrance created an experience of death that was both haptic and optic, exact and emotional, thereby revealing the contemporary desire to be immersed in the contemplation of a life lived and a fascination with mankind’s inevitable end. journal of the lucas graduate conference | 29 castIng presence INTRODUCTION The death mask of Sir Thomas Lawrence (1769-1830) moulded into the shape of his head (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Thomas Lawrence and the Waterloo Chamber
    Podcast transcript SIR THOMAS LAWRENCE AND THE WATERLOO CHAMBER Hello. And welcome to a podcast from Royal Collection Trust where we’ll hear about the dazzling portraits painted by Sir Thomas Lawrence. Desmond Shawe-Taylor, Surveyor of the Queen’s Pictures, gives a lecture at Windsor Castle about the magnificent Waterloo Chamber, which is dominated by Lawrence’s work. Hear the fascinating story of Lawrence’s travels across Europe to paint the celebrated figures from church and state who brought about the overthrow of Napoleon and championed diplomacy as the way to resolve future conflicts. The portraits capture a turning point in European history, but was this the new era of peace and co-operation they promised? Other talks, lectures and study days in our events programme can be found in the What’s On guide on our website. I’m going to be talking about, I suppose the, well definitely the Waterloo Chamber, and you might wonder why are we not there and it’s partly because I’m going to be looking at quite a lot of other material, much of it displayed in the Waterloo trail around Windsor Castle, so we couldn’t have absolutely just stood in the Waterloo Chamber, we would have needed to wander round. So you’re stuck with the standard lecture format, I’m afraid, but it means that you have to come back to see the Waterloo Chamber again, so it’s part of our marketing policy. And what I would like to do really is to introduce three characters, all of whom are in rough outline of the same generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Pictures and Prose Romantic Sensibility and the Great Plains in Catlin, Kane, and Miller
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for 1986 PICTURES AND PROSE ROMANTIC SENSIBILITY AND THE GREAT PLAINS IN CATLIN, KANE, AND MILLER Ann Davis Robert Thacker St. Lawrence University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Davis, Ann and Thacker, Robert, "PICTURES AND PROSE ROMANTIC SENSIBILITY AND THE GREAT PLAINS IN CATLIN, KANE, AND MILLER" (1986). Great Plains Quarterly. 891. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/891 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. PICTURES AND PROSE ROMANTIC SENSIBILITY AND THE GREAT PLAINS IN CATLIN, KANE, AND MILLER ANN DAVIS AND ROBERT THACKER T he romantic movement in America, like of many of the artists who joined western that in Europe, was characterized by fondness expeditions are well known, of course. In for the exotic and observation of nature. So keeping with the descriptive nature of such the Great Plains and the peoples who lived missions, many of these artists kept written as there were favored topics of artists and writers well as visual records of their experiences. from the mid-1820s through the 1850s. How­ They shared the nineteenth-century penchant ever, at its height the American romantic for travel literature of all sorts. Yet despite the movement was challenged by a subtle but documentary aims and achievements of the persistent search for realism.
    [Show full text]
  • William HOARE of Bath
    Neil Jeffares, Dictionary of pastellists before 1800 Online edition HOARE, William, RA Eye, Suffolk 1707 – Bath 1792 Part II: Named sitters I–Z Iles, v. Dimsdale J.395.1343 Frances, Lady IRWINE [Viscountess Irwin, née Frances Gibson Shepheard (1734– 1807), natural dau. of Samuel Shepheard], pstl/ppr, 59x44.5 (London, Christie’s, 20.III.1990, Lot 127 repr., attr., est. £1800– 2200, £2077) Φ Dr Samuel JOHNSON, pstl (Lichfield, Samuel Johnson Birthplace Museum). Olim attr. Hoare [??; v. a/r Reynolds] J.395.1354 Lady of the ?[??]KEMYS-TYNTE family of Halswell Park, Bridgewater, pstl, 60x44.5, c.1740s (Lord Wharton; London, Sotheby’s, 17.XI.1948, Lot 73 n.r., as Mrs Thrale by Vaillant, £5; E. M. Elmhurst. Cambridge, Cheffins, 17–18.XI.2004, Lot 695 repr., as Éc. fr. XVIIIe, of Mrs Gabriel Piozzi, Mrs Henry Thrale, née Hester Lynch Salusbury (1741– 1821), in widow’s weeds, est. £1000–1500. Photo courtesy Christie’s London, Sotheby’s, 7.VI.2006, Lot 312 repr., as J.395.1346 Miss Harriet ISTED (1752–1809), pstl, by Hoare, est. £2–3000, b/i; London, 45.5x30.5, inscr. verso, 1752 (Sotheby family, Bonham’s Knightsbridge, 23.IX.2008, Lot 1 Llanymynech; London, Sotheby’s, 16.VII.1981, repr., est. £1200–1800, b/i; Andrew Wyld; Lot 68 repr., est. £500–700, £750) Φ London, Christie’s South Kensington, 18.VII.2012, Lot 791 repr., est. £1200–1800, J.395.1356 Mr L’APÔTRE [?Henry L’Apostre, £2125). Lit.: Jeffares 2006, p. 575Ai, as English associate of Thomas Frederick as Trustees of sch.; Jeffares 2012a, fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Thomas LAWRENCE
    Neil Jeffares, Dictionary of pastellists before 1800 Online edition returned from India and facing impeachment on the finishing of crayons, (which I attempted,) was LAWRENCE, Sir Thomas such that from proof I found my receipts were more Bristol 13.IV.1769 – London 7.I.1830 proceedings for corruption; that they were important commissions for Lawrence is when I painted for two guineas and a half, than they Lawrence’s father, an innkeeper, went bankrupt were when I had five. At the same time that I inform in 1779, and the family moved from the Black evidenced by the multiple versions of the Impey Miss Hartley of this, I must blame my own Bear at Devizes to Oxford, settling the following pastel, one of which belonged to another East imprudence, in not making myself acquainted with year in Bath. Both cities offered a supply of India associate, Ynyr Burges, who commissioned the prices of the painters here, as it is my wish ever to sitters for the infant prodigy’s talents in his own and four further family portraits. be clear from the charge of presumption, which I fear portraiture. Already, in the Bath journal for In 1787 Lawrence moved from Bath to I have incurred. 20.XII.1779, verses appeared “To Master London, stopping at Salisbury on the way I am much honoured and obliged in the Duchess LAWRENCE, on seeing his very valuable and (Williams says that a number of crayons from Dowager of Beaufort, and Mrs. M. Townshend, interesting themselves in my behalf, and Madam, if most inimitable Copy of the Figure of HOPE that visit were still in the city in 1831).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2002
    2002 ANNUAL REPORT NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART WASHINGTON, D C. BOARD OF TRUSTEES Robert F. Erburu AUDIT COMMITTEE TRUSTEES' COUNCIL Sally Engelhard Pingree (as of 30 September 2002) Chairman (as of 30 September 2002) Diana C. Prince Robert F. Erburu Mitchell P. Rales Chairman Victoria P. Sant, Chair Catherine B. Reynolds Paul H. O'Neill La Salle D. Leffall Jr., Vice Chair Sharon Percy Rockefeller Robert H. Smith The Secretary of the Treasury Leon D. Black President Robert M. Rosenthal Robert H. Smith W. Russell G. Byers Jr. Roger W. Sant Julian Ganz, Jr. Calvin Cafritz B. Francis Saul II David 0. Maxwell William T. Coleman Jr. Thomas A. Saunders III Victoria P. Sant Edwin L. Cox Julian Ganz, Jr. Albert H. Small — James T. Dyke James S. Smith FINANCE COMMITTEE Mark D. Ein Ruth Carter Stevenson Edward E. Elson Roselyne C. Swig Robert H. Smith Doris Fisher Chairman Frederick A. Terry Jr. David 0. Maxwell Aaron I. Fleischman Paul H. O'Neill Joseph G. Tompkins Juliet C. Folger The Secretary of the Treasury John C. Whitehead John C. Fontaine Robert F. Erburu John Wilmerding Marina K. French Julian Ganz, Jr. Dian Woodner Morton Funger David 0. Maxwell Nina Zolt 1 Victoria P. Sant Lenore Greenberg Victoria P. Sant Rose Ellen Meyerhoff Greene EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ART AND EDUCATION Frederic C. Hamilton (as of 30 September 2002) COMMITTEE Richard C. Hedreen Teresa F. Heinz Robert H. Smith William H. Rehnquist i: Raymond J. Horowitz President The Chief Justice Robert H. Smith of the United States Chairman Robert J. Hurst Earl A.
    [Show full text]