Natural Heritage Inventory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Natural Heritage Inventory MARIAN PINKER TON BU LLMOOSE SH ARON DONEGAL SPRINGS MEETING HOUSE RUN OAK Conoy Creek Accomac, Marietta, Wrightsville Rivershore 772 Maytown Conoy Township East Donegal Township 441 D one Chiques Creek gal C r e Marietta e k West Hempfield Susquehanna River Township Chanceford Township (Limit of Aerial imagery) Columbia 30 Boro Lancaster County Natural Heritage Inventory Update 2008 Legend 462 Species of concern core habitat Natural Heritage Area Roads Wrightsville Lancaster County Supporting Landscape PA Turnpike Boro Streams All other roads Riparian Buffer Municipal Boundary (LimitAerialof imagery) York County 0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2 Miles Accomac, Marietta, Wrightsville Rivershore Accomac, Marietta, Wrightsville Rivershore – High significance PNHP Rank1 State Last Observed Species of Concern: Quality2 Global State Status1 (y-m-d) Plants: Scarlet ammannia (Ammannia coccinea) G5 S2 PE 2006-10-03 C Waterpod (Ellisia nyctelea) G5 S2 PT 1991-05-14 C Carolina leaf-flower (Phyllanthus caroliniensis) G5 S1 PE 2006-10-03 BC Tooth-cup (Rotala ramosior) G5 S3 PR 2006-10-03 C River bulrush (Schoenoplectus fluviatilis) G5 S3 PR 2006-10-03 C Sida (Sida hermaphrodita) G3 S2 PE 2006-10-03 CD Susquehanna trillium (Trillium sp.) GU SU TU 1996-05-01 C Animals: Bronze copper butterfly (Lycaena hyllus) G5 SU - 1996-08-31 E Sensitive species of concern3 - - - 1994 E 1 Please refer to Appendix IV for an explanation of PNHP ranks and legal status 2 Please refer to Appendix V for an explanation of quality ranks 3 This species is not named at the request of the agency overseeing its protection Location: This section of the Susquehanna River is roughly seven miles long, running from the railroad bridge just north of the Conoy / East Donegal Township line to the Columbia / Wrightsville Bridge, and includes riverside portions of the Borough of Marietta. o Municipalities: o Conoy Township, (Lancaster County) o East Donegal Township, (Lancaster County) o Marietta Borough, (Lancaster County) o West Hempfield Township, (Lancaster County) o Hellam Township, (York County) o Wrightsville Borough, (York County) o USGS Quadrangles: o Columbia West Quadrangle o York Haven Quadrangle o 1990 Lancaster Natural Areas Inventory reference: o “Vinegar Ferry” – (Columbia West Quadrangle) Description: The low, flood prone shoreline primarily on the Lancaster side of the Susquehanna River provides the appropriate habitat for most of the species of concern documented at this location. Flooding and river ice scour the shoreline, removing and replacing soil seasonally, which helps to create conditions favorable to annual plants that can go from seed to maturity in one growing season. The seasonally flooded areas and shallow mudflats between the railroad tracks and the river are of particular interest for plant species that thrive in the habitat created by this natural disturbance. Mudflats and shallow water habitats occur among the bedrock outcrops on either side of the Route 30 Bridge west of Columbia Borough; directly in front of the Borough of Marietta; on the west shore of the river and adjacent to Riverfront Park at Vinegar Ferry Road. The shallow mudflats exposed during periods of low river level provide habitat for wading birds who feed on 125 Accomac, Marietta, Wrightsville Rivershore aquatic plants and animals. This habitat also provides an important migratory stopping place for these and other birds that use the Susquehanna River as a migratory pathway. Species of Concern Considerations: Plants: o Four plant species of concern documented at this location are annual plants: the globally secure (G5), state imperiled (S2) scarlet ammania; the globally secure (G5), state imperiled (S2) waterpod; the globally secure (G5), state critically imperiled (S1) Carolina leaf-flower; and the globally secure (G5), state rare (S3) tooth-cup. They reach maturity from seed in a single season. They are adapted to the seasonal flooding disturbance and shallow water conditions inherent along the floodplain of the Susquehanna River and do well in habitats favoring ‘weedy’ species of plants. Populations of these species can be enhanced by maintaining the natural seasonal fluctuations in the water level of the river and the natural conditions of its shoreline. o River bulrush is a globally secure (G5), state rare (S3) perennial plant that is also adapted to the natural disturbance of seasonal flooding along the river. It is an emergent aquatic plant that can form dense stands from spreading roots. Populations of this plant can be enhanced by maintaining the natural seasonal fluctuations in the water level of the river and the natural conditions of its shoreline. o Sida is considered globally rare (G3) and state imperiled (S2) due to the few localized populations that occur around the world. Sida is a tall, robust, perennial plant that is also adapted to the natural disturbance of seasonal flooding along the river. Populations of this plant can be enhanced by maintaining the natural seasonal fluctuations in the water level of the river and the natural conditions of its shoreline. o Susquehanna trillium occurs in a forest ravine on the York County side of the Susquehanna River. The populations of declined trillium in the lower Susquehanna ravines are plants of uncertain taxonomy, which is to say, the populations of this trillium do not fall neatly into one species characterization. These populations may be hybrids between declined trillium and purple trillium (Trillium flexipes and Trillium erectum) and may be unique to the lower Susquehanna River. With the taxonomic uncertainty in mind, the Susquehanna trillium has not been given global and state status ranks. This taxonomic puzzle needs to be investigated further, but either way, the populations of these trilliums are worthy of conservation action. Conservation of the rich forested habitat should provide the protection needed for this species. Unauthorized collection for wildflower gardens is also a potential threat. Animals: o The principal habitat of the globally secure (G5), state undetermined (SU) bronze copper butterfly is found in wet meadows and marshes especially along river floodplains. The primary food source of the caterpillars of this species are plants in the buckwheat family (Polygonaceae) such as peach-leaved dock (Rumex altissimus). Conservation and expansion of this type of habitat in the area will help ensure continued breeding success for this species. Mowing of the area should be nonexistent, or selective and infrequent to help promote growth of host plants supporting this butterfly species of concern. o The core habitat for this sensitive species of concern is primarily in the adjacent Brunner (Lows) Island Natural Heritage Area to the north. This sensitive species of concern requires abundant food source and breeding areas. This can be achieved by preserving and improving the water quality of the Susquehanna River and by protecting and expanding the natural vegetation buffer along the river. Forest Cover / Natural Communities: The plant community types depicted are only approximations delineated from 2005 aerial photography interpretation and were followed up with minimal selective ground-truthing. Community types follow “Terrestrial & Palustrine Plant Communities of Pennsylvania” (Fike 1999) where appropriate, and describe general land cover types where they are not. o Most of the York County side of the river and adjacent hills is in nearly continuous forest cover dominated by a dry oak - heath forest and includes significant patches of interior forest. The narrow western shoreline floodplain has been largely converted to residential uses. o The Lancaster County side of the river is dominated by agriculture, urban and suburban land uses with only a few small parcels of forest cover remaining. The floodplain between the railroad tracks and the 126 Accomac, Marietta, Wrightsville Rivershore river adjacent to Riverfront Park is seasonally flooded and contains remnants of a silver maple floodplain forest and wet meadows interspersed with active agricultural fields and parkland. Ownership: o Much of the species of concern core habitat occurs in floodplain habitat that is subject to such intense flooding as to be considered part of the river. Floodplain areas between the river and the railroad tracks in this section are mostly owned by the respective municipalities. o A portion of the widest section of floodplain contains a small public park (Riverfront Park). o An industrial complex occupies a large parcel north of the Borough of Marietta. o The remaining river floodplain is held in several agricultural parcels and numerous urban residential parcels. Habitat Disturbances: o Historic – o The original forest cover of the area had been removed and converted to agricultural uses over the past several centuries, leaving little of the original vegetation in place. The borough of Marietta was constructed on the banks of the river including a portion of the floodplain. o Railroad tracks were built along the shoreline of the river, effectively severing the river from much of the original floodplain and the adjacent uplands. o Aerial photographs from 1940 indicate that a railroad siding/transfer hub appears to have been constructed north of Marietta, which is currently a large industrial complex. o Current – o Most of the eastern shore of this section of the river fails to function as a terrestrial habitat corridor through the region. A much wider and enhanced vegetated buffer is needed on the floodplain on the eastern shore of the Susquehanna River. The vegetated area between the railroad tracks and the river is in many areas too narrow to adequately function as a terrestrial habitat corridor. Animals traveling northward though the extensive forested river hills area are suddenly forced into a very narrow strip of land between the river and the railroad tracks to avoid the heavily urban, suburban and agricultural land uses north of Washington Borough, Columbia and Marietta. o The borough of Marietta has not grown significantly since 1940, although suburban growth has effectively filled the open space between Marietta and Maytown.
Recommended publications
  • Orange Sulphur, Colias Eurytheme, on Boneset
    Orange Sulphur, Colias eurytheme, on Boneset, Eupatorium perfoliatum, In OMC flitrh Insect Survey of Waukegan Dunes, Summer 2002 Including Butterflies, Dragonflies & Beetles Prepared for the Waukegan Harbor Citizens' Advisory Group Jean B . Schreiber (Susie), Chair Principal Investigator : John A. Wagner, Ph . D . Associate, Department of Zoology - Insects Field Museum of Natural History 1400 South Lake Shore Drive Chicago, Illinois 60605 Telephone (708) 485 7358 home (312) 665 7016 museum Email jwdw440(q-), m indsprinq .co m > home wagner@,fmnh .orq> museum Abstract: From May 10, 2002 through September 13, 2002, eight field trips were made to the Harbor at Waukegan, Illinois to survey the beach - dunes and swales for Odonata [dragonfly], Lepidoptera [butterfly] and Coleoptera [beetles] faunas between Midwest Generation Plant on the North and the Outboard Marine Corporation ditch at the South . Eight species of Dragonflies, fourteen species of Butterflies, and eighteen species of beetles are identified . No threatened or endangered species were found in this survey during twenty-four hours of field observations . The area is undoubtedly home to many more species than those listed in this report. Of note, the endangered Karner Blue butterfly, Lycaeides melissa samuelis Nabakov was not seen even though it has been reported from Illinois Beach State Park, Lake County . The larval food plant, Lupinus perennis, for the blue was not observed at Waukegan. The limestone seeps habitat of the endangered Hines Emerald dragonfly, Somatochlora hineana, is not part of the ecology here . One surprise is the. breeding population of Buckeye butterflies, Junonia coenid (Hubner) which may be feeding on Purple Loosestrife . The specimens collected in this study are deposited in the insect collection at the Field Museum .
    [Show full text]
  • CRP-SAFE for Karner Blue Butterflies Recommendations for Wisconsin Landowners and Conservationists
    CRP-SAFE for Karner Blue Butterflies Recommendations for Wisconsin Landowners and Conservationists August 2013 The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation www.xerces.org Acknowledgements We thank Scott Swengel, Scott Hoffman Black, Jane Anklam, Andrew Bourget and John Sippl for helpful comments on earlier versions of this document, and additional USDA FSA and NRCS Altoona Service Center staff, UW-Eau Claire Office of Research and Sponsored Projects and undergraduate researchers for their collaboration and support. We also thank Karner blue CRP- SAFE participants for their participation in the conservation program. Authors Dr. Paula Kleintjes Neff University of Wisconsin – Eau Claire Department of Biology Eric Mader Assistant Pollinator Program Director The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation Editing and layout Kaitlyn Rich, Matthew Shepherd, Hailey Walls, Ashley Minnerath. Photo credits Thank you to the photographers who generously allowed use of their images. Copyright of all photographs remains with the photographers. Cover main: Karner blue butterfly. William Bouton. Cover bottom left: Lupine field. Eric Mader, The Xerces Society. Cover bottom right: CRP-SAFE field. Paula Kleintjes Neff. Copyright © 2013 The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation 628 NE Broadway Suite 200, Portland, OR 97232 855-232-6639 www.xerces.org The Xerces Society is a nonprofit organization that protects wildlife through the conservation of invertebrates and their habitat. Established in 1971, the Society is at the forefront of invertebrate protection worldwide. The Xerces Society is an equal opportunity employer. 2 Date Last Modified: August 30, 2013 CRP-SAFE for Karner Blue Butterflies Recommendations for Wisconsin Landowners and Conservationists Introduction Nearly 2,000 acres of habitat for the federally endangered Karner blue butterfly Lycaeides( melisssa samuelis) have been established in western Wisconsin through the CRP-SAFE program since 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Use This Checklist
    How To Use This Checklist Swallowtails: Family Papilionidae Special Note: Spring and Summer Azures have recently The information presented in this checklist reflects our __ Pipevine Swallowtail Battus philenor R; May - Sep. been recognized as separate species. Azure taxonomy has not current understanding of the butterflies found within __ Zebra Swallowtail Eurytides marcellus R; May - Aug. been completely sorted out by the experts. Cleveland Metroparks. (This list includes all species that have __ Black Swallowtail Papilio polyxenes C; May - Sep. __ Appalachian Azure Celastrina neglecta-major h; mid - late been recorded in Cuyahoga County, and a few additional __ Giant Swallowtail Papilio cresphontes h; rare in Cleveland May; not recorded in Cuy. Co. species that may occur here.) Record you observations and area; July - Aug. Brush-footed Butterflies: Family Nymphalidae contact a naturalist if you find something that may be of __ Eastern Tiger Swallowtail Papilio glaucus C; May - Oct.; __ American Snout Libytheana carinenta R; June - Oct. interest. females occur as yellow or dark morphs __ Variegated Fritillary Euptoieta claudia R; June - Oct. __ Spicebush Swallowtail Papilio troilus C; May - Oct. __ Great Spangled Fritillary Speyeria cybele C; May - Oct. Species are listed taxonomically, with a common name, a Whites and Sulphurs: Family Pieridae __ Aphrodite Fritillary Speyeria aphrodite O; June - Sep. scientific name, a note about its relative abundance and flight __ Checkered White Pontia protodice h; rare in Cleveland area; __ Regal Fritillary Speyeria idalia X; no recent Ohio records; period. Check off species that you identify within Cleveland May - Oct. formerly in Cleveland Metroparks Metroparks. __ West Virginia White Pieris virginiensis O; late Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • Specimen Records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895
    Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 2019 Vol 3(2) Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895 Jon H. Shepard Paul C. Hammond Christopher J. Marshall Oregon State Arthropod Collection, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331 Cite this work, including the attached dataset, as: Shepard, J. S, P. C. Hammond, C. J. Marshall. 2019. Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895. Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 3(2). (beta version). http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/osu/cat_osac.3.2.4594 Introduction These records were generated using funds from the LepNet project (Seltmann) - a national effort to create digital records for North American Lepidoptera. The dataset published herein contains the label data for all North American specimens of Lycaenidae and Riodinidae residing at the Oregon State Arthropod Collection as of March 2019. A beta version of these data records will be made available on the OSAC server (http://osac.oregonstate.edu/IPT) at the time of this publication. The beta version will be replaced in the near future with an official release (version 1.0), which will be archived as a supplemental file to this paper. Methods Basic digitization protocols and metadata standards can be found in (Shepard et al. 2018). Identifications were confirmed by Jon Shepard and Paul Hammond prior to digitization. Nomenclature follows that of (Pelham 2008). Results The holdings in these two families are extensive. Combined, they make up 25,743 specimens (24,598 Lycanidae and 1145 Riodinidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Overview of Butterflies in the Southern Headwaters at Risk Project (SHARP) Area
    Conservation Overview of Butterflies in the Southern Headwaters at Risk Project (SHARP) Area Al Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 80 Conservation Overview of Butterflies in the Southern Headwaters at Risk Project (SHARP) Area Norbert G. Kondla Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 80 January 2004 Publication No. I/136 ISBN: 0-7785-2954-1 (Printed Edition) ISBN: 0-7785-2955-X (On-line Edition) ISSN: 1496-7219 (Printed Edition) ISSN: 1496-7146 (On-line Edition) Cover photograph: Norbert Kondla, Plebejus melissa (Melissa Blue), Maycroft, AB For copies of this report, contact: Information Centre- Publications Alberta Environment/ Alberta Sustainable Resource Development Main Floor, Great West Life Building 9920- 108 Street Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5K 2M4 Telephone: (780) 422-2079 OR Information Service Alberta Environment/ Alberta Sustainable Resource Development #100, 3115- 12 Street NE Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2E 7J2 Telephone: (403) 297- 3362 OR Visit our web site at: http://www3.gov.ab.ca/srd/fw/riskspecies/ This publication may be cited as: Kondla, N.G. 2004. Conservation overview of butterflies in the southern headwaters at risk project (SHARP) area. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Fish and Wildlife Division, Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 80. Edmonton, AB. 35 pp. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY ASSOCIATION 4 Delaware Road, Morristown, NJ 07960
    NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY ASSOCIATION 4 Delaware Road, Morristown, NJ 07960 tel. 973-285-0907 fax 973-285-0936 web: www.naba.org 41st ANNUAL NABA BUTTERFLY COUNT - 2015 INSTRUCTIONS (CANADA) COUNTERS & COUNT CIRCLES Please report your 2015 count results directly to NABA through Unless your count is an existing 1st of July count started before our online count form at www.naba.org. The online form 2008, at least 4 adult observers must participate. One or more allows compilers to enter all data for their counts through the groups of counters always produce better results. It is usually Web and also allows the regional editors to review and edit the desirable to visit several habitats and areas within a count circle, reports more efficiently. Most importantly, Butterfly Count which may be done best by several parties. Since counts are information will be entered and stored in a database which in the open for public participation, we encourage you to publicize future will allow it to be available online to NABA members your count plans! and the public. All compilers are now requested to enter the data A count is held at one or more selected sites within a for their counts through the online count form. If this presents 15-mile diameter CIRCLE. Groups starting a new count MUST any difficulty, please contact NABA for assistance. designate this 15-mile diameter circle. No count circles may overlap—that is, count centers must be a minimum of 15 miles COUNT PROGRAM OVERVIEW apart. Groups repeating a count held a previous year MUST use In order to encourage increased participation in the NABA the same circle, and count the same sites and habitats as before Butterfly Count Program and to encourage even more so far as practical.
    [Show full text]
  • Z!Jfj1jjtis/(I __ Pontia Occidentalis Western White Jt I>Ei>R.1U :I Zaii As __ Pieris Napi Mustard White (Incl.Angelika)-Unspecified Subsp
    (ff;) 2002 Count Name, S~~te iJfiL/,k/Ll R.I '/IE.fl #wt Imminent threats to habitat: ______________ AIW J?f.R,£,:_Y , ___ Year count held & subm!tted for publication (1 st,2nd ~tc.): 3 llo 0 1 CENl'ERAT (1atitude)_:ll__ ..Jil...'N, (lo ~itude)_17_0 .Y._•w CF.NTERAT (describe in words) iJtl7 Cof#/1'/ /?.?J6S Changes noticed since last year:------------ suS:f tX) N - 7 includes {in circle - 1st year count only)--------- ***Alll!!J'BU1TERFLIE.S*** ifa species is not listed, write it in on a blank line. -----------(Send a map with first year counts.) To indicate a subspecies, write it in after the species name. Elevation: (low) £00 to {high)~ ft I m (circle unit of measure) PAPIL!ONIDAE- Swallowtails Habitat (of area counted - 1st year count only):------- __ Parnassius clodius Clodius Pamassian __ Parnassius phoebus Phoebus Parnassian-unspecified subsp. (P. p. phoebus) 'Phoebus' Phoebus Parnassian DATE: 11/ib.oo~ TIME: 2.·11A1Y to ct.--1.fp/'f __ (P. p. smintheus) 'Rocky Mountain' Ph. Pamassian AM: (circle appropriate words:) clear~ some fog __ (P. p. behri) 'Sierra Nevada' Phoebus Pamassian partly cloudy mostly cloudy inte~ moderate heavy __ Battus philenor Pipevine Swallowtail drizzle rain hail; % time in AM sun was shining:__ % __ Battus polydamas Polydamas Swallowtail PM: (circle a ropriate words:) clear mostly clear hazy some fog __ Eurytides marce/lus Zebra Swallowtail a y c oud mostly cloudy intermittent light moderate heavy U Papilio polyxenes (includes kahli) Black Swallowtail drizz e rain hail; % time in PM sun was shining: __% __ Papilio joanae Ozark Swallowtail TEMPERATIJRE: _]L_0 to ~° F °F = {°C x 1.8) + 32 __ Papi/io machaon Old World Swallowtail-unspecified subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Kansas Butterflies ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
    A POCKET GUIDE TO Common Kansas Butterflies ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ By Jim Mason Funded by Westar Energy Green Team, Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc., Occidental Chemical Corporation and the Chickadee Checkoff Published by the Friends of the Great Plains Nature Center Table of Contents • Introduction • 2 • Butterflies vs. Moths • 4 • Observing Butterflies • 4 Family Papilionidae - Swallowtails ■ Pipevine Swallowtail • 6 ■ Zebra Swallowtail • 7 ■ Black Swallowtail • 8 ■ Giant Swallowtail • 9 ■ Eastern Tiger Swallowtail • 10 Family Pieridae – Whites & Sulphurs ■ Checkered White • 11 ■ Cabbage White • 12 ■ Clouded Sulphur • 13 ■ Orange Sulphur • 14 ■ Cloudless Sulphur • 15 ■ Sleepy Orange • 16 ■ Little Yellow • 17 ■ Dainty Sulphur • 18 ■ Southern Dogface • 19 Family Lycaenidae – Gossamer-Wings ■ Gray Copper • 20 ■ Bronze Copper • 21 ■ Coral Hairstreak • 22 ■ Gray Hairstreak • 23 ■ Juniper Hairstreak • 24 ■ Reakirts' Blue • 25 ■ Eastern Tailed-Blue • 26 ■ Spring Azure and Summer Azure • 27 Family Nymphalidae – Brushfoots ■ American Snout • 28 ■ Variegated Fritillary • 29 ■ Great Spangled Fritillary • 30 ■ Regal Fritillary • 31 ■ Gorgone Checkerspot • 32 ■ Silvery Checkerspot • 33 ■ Phaon Crescent • 34 ■ Pearl Crescent • 35 ■ Question Mark • 36 ■ Eastern Comma • 37 ■ Mourning Cloak • 38 ■ American Lady • 39 ©Greg Sievert ■ Painted Lady • 40 ■ Red Admiral • 41 ■ Common Buckeye • 42 ■ Red-spotted Purple • 43 ■ Viceroy • 44 ■ Goatweed Leafwing • 45 ■ Hackberry Emperor • 46 ■ Tawny Emperor • 47 ■ Little Wood Satyr • 48 ■ Common Wood Nymph • 49 ■ Monarch • 50 Family
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Response to Floral Resources During Early Establishment at A
    J Insect Conserv (2012) 16:457–472 DOI 10.1007/s10841-011-9433-4 ORIGINAL PAPER Butterfly response to floral resources during early establishment at a heterogeneous prairie biomass production site in Iowa, USA Mark C. Myers • Benjamin J. Hoksch • James T. Mason Received: 5 March 2011 / Accepted: 18 August 2011 / Published online: 1 September 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract In the Midwestern USA, current biofuel pro- marginal lands could have positive effects on the mainte- duction systems rely on high input monoculture crops that nance of butterfly populations in agricultural landscapes. do little to support native biodiversity. The University of Northern Iowa’s Tallgrass Prairie Center is investigating Keywords Bioenergy Á Community ecology Á the feasibility of cultivating and harvesting diverse mixes Grassland restoration Á Lepidoptera Á Species richness of native prairie vegetation for use as a sustainable biofuel in a manner that also conserves biodiversity and protects soil and water resources. In 2009, we established 48 Introduction research plots on three soil types at an Iowa site with a uniform history of row crop production. We seeded each The destruction, degradation, and fragmentation of grass- plot with one of four treatments of native prairie vegeta- land habitats has triggered significant butterfly population tion: (1) switchgrass monoculture, (2) warm-season grass declines and range contractions throughout Europe (Krauss mix (5 grass species), (3) biomass mix (16 species of et al. 2010; Polus et al. 2007; Stefanescu et al. 2010; grasses, legumes, and forbs), or (4) prairie mix (32 species Thomas et al. 2004) and North America (Forister et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Community Temporal Trends and Responses to Resource Availability Along a Hydrologic Gradient of Montane Meadows Jennet C
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2008 Butterfly community temporal trends and responses to resource availability along a hydrologic gradient of montane meadows Jennet C. Caruthers Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Caruthers, Jennet C., "Butterfly ommc unity temporal trends and responses to resource availability along a hydrologic gradient of montane meadows" (2008). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 15359. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/15359 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Butterfly community temporal trends and responses to resource availability along a hydrologic gradient of montane meadows by Jennet C. Caruthers A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program of Study Committee: Diane M. Debinski, Major Professor Brian J. Wilsey David L. Otis Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2008 1453895 1453895 2008 ii DEDICATION To my husband, Hanh, for his patience and his loving support. iii
    [Show full text]
  • Sentinels on the Wing: the Status and Conservation of Butterflies in Canada
    Sentinels on the Wing The Status and Conservation of Butterflies in Canada Peter W. Hall Foreword In Canada, our ties to the land are strong and deep. Whether we have viewed the coasts of British Columbia or Cape Breton, experienced the beauty of the Arctic tundra, paddled on rivers through our sweeping boreal forests, heard the wind in the prairies, watched caribou swim the rivers of northern Labrador, or searched for song birds in the hardwood forests of south eastern Canada, we all call Canada our home and native land. Perhaps because Canada’s landscapes are extensive and cover a broad range of diverse natural systems, it is easy for us to assume the health of our important natural spaces and the species they contain. Our country seems so vast compared to the number of Canadians that it is difficult for us to imagine humans could have any lasting effect on nature. Yet emerging science demonstrates that our natural systems and the species they contain are increas- ingly at risk. While the story is by no means complete, key indicator species demonstrate that Canada’s natural legacy is under pressure from a number of sources, such as the conversion of lands for human uses, the release of toxic chemicals, the introduction of new, invasive species or the further spread of natural pests, and a rapidly changing climate. These changes are hitting home and, with the globalization and expansion of human activities, it is clear the pace of change is accelerating. While their flights of fancy may seem insignificant, butterflies are sentinels or early indicators of this change, and can act as important messengers to raise awareness.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Species List for the Allwine Prairie Tract at Glacier Creek Preserve
    Butterfly List - Updated 22 May 2020 Butterfly Species List for the Allwine Prairie Tract at Glacier Creek Preserve Compiled/confirmed by Dr. Ted Burk, Creighton University (updated 22 May 2020) Phylum: Arthropoda ‐‐ Class: Insecta ‐‐ Order: Lepidoptera References* Family Scientific Name Common Name R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 Hesperiidae Amblyscirtes vialis Common Roadside‐Skipper X Hesperiidae Ancyloxypha numitor Least Skipper XXXX Hesperiidae Atalopedes campestris Sachem XXXX Hesperiidae Anatrytone logan Delaware Skipper XXXX Hesperiidae Epargyreus clarus Silver‐spotted Skipper XXXX Hesperiidae Erynnis baptisiae Wild Indigo Duskywing XXX Hesperiidae Erynnis funeralis Funereal Duskywing XXX Hesperiidae Euphyes bimacula Two‐spotted Skipper X X Hesperiidae Hylephila phyleus Fiery Skipper X Hesperiidae Lerodea eufala Eufala Skipper X X X Hesperiidae Pholisora catullus Common Sootywing XXXX Hesperiidae Polites origenes Crossline Skipper X Hesperiidae Polites peckius Peck’s Skipper XXXX Hesperiidae Polites themistocles Tawny‐edged Skipper XXXX Hesperiidae Pompeius verna Little Glassywing X Hesperiidae Pyrgus communis Common Checkered ‐SkipperXXXX Lycaenidae Callophrys gryneus Olive Hairstreak X X Lycaenidae Celestrina ladon Spring Azure XXXX Lycaenidae Everes comyntas Eastern Tailed‐Blue XXXX Lycaenidae Feniseca tarquinius Harvester X Lycaenidae Hemiargus isola Reakirt’s Blue XXXX Lycaenidae Lycaeides melissa Melissa Blue X X Lycaenidae Lycaena dione Gray Copper X X X Lycaenidae Lycaena hyllus Bronze Copper XXXX Lycaenidae Satyrium calanus Banded
    [Show full text]