Responses of the Catalpa Sphinx, Ceratomia Catalpae, and Its Primary Parasitoid, Cotesia Congregata, to Varying Levels of Iridoid Glycosides in Catalpa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Responses of the Catalpa Sphinx, Ceratomia Catalpae, and Its Primary Parasitoid, Cotesia Congregata, to Varying Levels of Iridoid Glycosides in Catalpa Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2015 RESPONSES OF THE CATALPA SPHINX, CERATOMIA CATALPAE, AND ITS PRIMARY PARASITOID, COTESIA CONGREGATA, TO VARYING LEVELS OF IRIDOID GLYCOSIDES IN CATALPA Jessica L. Bray Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons, and the Entomology Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/3770 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Jessica Bray, April 2015 All Rights Reserved RESPONSES OF THE CATALPA SPHINX, CERATOMIA CATALPAE, AND ITS PRIMARY PARASITOID, COTESIA CONGREGATA, TO VARYING LEVELS OF IRIDOID GLYCOSIDES IN CATALPA A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at Virginia Commonwealth University. by JESSICA L. BRAY B.S., Longwood University, 2012 Major Professor: KAREN M. KESTER, PH.D. Associate Professor, Department of Biology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia April, 2015 Acknowledgments I thank my advisor, Dr. Karen Kester, for her guidance and mentorship on this project. I also thank my fellow graduate students, Justin Bredlau and Megan Ayers, for their help and moral support throughout graduate school. During my time at VCU, they have become very close friends. I also thank my fellow labmate, Kanchan Joshi, who took care of the hyperparasitoid colonies while I was away at conferences and the many Bug lab interns, especially LeAynne Miller and Kathleen Lau, who helped rear caterpillars to maintain the wasp colonies. Thanks, too, to VCU independent study student Andrew Wood for collecting the 2011 oviposition data, Mr. and Mrs. Buster Tyson for allowing me to collect catalpa leaves and catalpa sphinx caterpillars on their property, and the “Bowers laboratory” for analyzing leaf samples. Finally, I thank Dr. M. Deane Bowers, as well as the rest of my committee members, Dr. Michael Fine, Dr. Salvatore Agosta, and Dr. Edward Boone, for their advice and feedback on my project. i Table of Contents Page Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. i Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ ii List of Tables .................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................... iii Abstract………. ................................................................................................................. iv Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 Materials and Methods .........................................................................................................6 Results ................................................................................................................................13 Discussion ..........................................................................................................................16 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................19 Literature Cited ..................................................................................................................20 Tables and Figures .............................................................................................................25 Vita .....................................................................................................................................35 ii List of Tables Page Table 1: Species characteristics of catalpa trees of interest ...............................................25 Table 2: Results of a two- way ANOVA comparing searching times of wild and colony wasps ................................................................................................26 List of Figures Page Figure 1: Feeding preference assay design ........................................................................27 Figure 2: Percent dry weight total iridoid glycosides, catalpol and catalposide in catalpa trees of interest ....................................................................................................28 Figure 3: Comparison of percent defoliation to percent dry weight total iridoid glycosides, catalpol and catalposide ...................................................................30 Figure 4: Comparison of moth oviposition preference to high and low iridoid glycoside trees .........................................................................................32 Figure 5: Comparison of caterpillar feeding preferences to high and low iridoid glycoside leaf discs .................................................................................33 Figure 6: Comparison of wasp searching responses to high and low iridoid glycoside leaf discs .................................................................................34 iii Abstract RESPONSES OF THE CATALPA SPHINX, CERATOMIA CATALPAE, AND ITS PRIMARY PARASITOID, COTESIA CONGREGATA, TO VARYING LEVELS OF IRIDOID GLYCOSIDES IN CATALPA By Jessica L. Bray A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology at Virginia Commonwealth University. Virginia Commonwealth University, 2015 Director: Karen M. Kester, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Department of Biology The catalpa sphinx, Ceratomia catalpae, is a specialist on Catalpa trees, which produce iridoid glycosides (IGs). Whereas some trees are defoliated every year, others escape herbivory. Caterpillar populations are either heavily parasitized by the braconid wasp, Cotesia congregata, or remain unparasitized. We hypothesized that these patterns could be explained by variable IG concentrations among trees and insect responses to these chemicals. IG concentrations varied among trees. Percent defoliation was positively iv related to IG concentration. In comparisons of insect responses to relatively high or low IG concentrations, moths preferred to oviposit on trees with high IG concentrations. Caterpillars did not display a feeding preference nor did wasps differ in searching responses to leaf discs with high or low IG concentrations. Results indicate that observed patterns of herbivory can be explained by moth oviposition preferences for trees with high IG concentrations. v INTRODUCTION Plant secondary metabolites function as feeding and oviposition stimulants or deterrents for many phytophagous insects. Insect species vary greatly in their degree of host specialization and in their ovipositional and feeding responses to plants. Whereas generalists may accept a variety of plants as hosts, specialists typically require specific cues from secondary metabolites in order to accept a plant as a host (Bernays & Chapman 1994). For example, Pieris brassicae L. (Pieridae) butterflies respond to glucosinolates produced by crucifers as oviposition stimulants (van Loon et al. 1992, Chew & Renwick, 1995). Some specialists sequester secondary metabolites as a defense against their natural enemies (Dyer & Gentry 1999, Dicke 2000). Levels of secondary metabolites can vary within individuals and both within and among populations of hostplants, and the absence or low levels of these plant cues may cause an insect to overlook an acceptable hostplant (van der Meijden 1996). This variation in plant chemistry can be affected by genetics (Berenbaum et al. 1986, Mihaliak et al. 1989) as well as environmental factors (Mihaliak et al. 1989). For example, in wild parsnip Pastinaca sativa L. (Apiaceae) variation in plant defenses to its primary herbivore, Depressaria pastinacella (Duponchel) (Elachistidae) is partially genetically controlled (Berenbaum et al. 1986). Likewise, iridoid glycoside concentrations in Plantago lanceolata L. (Plantaginaceae) vary within and among populations (Bowers & Stamp 1992, Bowers et al. 1992), partially determined by genotypic differences (Bowers & Stamp 1992, 1993, Adler et al. 1995, Reudler Talsma et al. 2008). Iridoid glycosides (IGs) are a group of secondary metabolites common in over fifty different plant families (Bobbitt & Segebarth 1969, El- Naggar & Beal 1980, Bowers & Puttick 1986). Some lepidopterans are specialists on plants that produce iridoid glycosides (Bowers & 1 Puttick 1986, Optiz & Müller 2009). Specialist butterflies that are attracted to plants containing these compounds often prefer to oviposit on plants with higher concentrations of iridoid glycosides. For example, the Glanville fritillary, Melitaea cinxia L. (Nymphalidae), and the buckeye butterfly, Junonia coenia Hübner (Nymphalidae), both prefer to oviposit on P. lanceolata with high concentrations of iridoid glycosides (Nieminen et al. 2003, Pereyra & Bowers 1988). Larvae of these species sequester iridoid glycosides as a defense against their natural enemies and therefore, sequestration may provide offspring with a higher chance of survival (Bowers & Stamp 1992). The relative unpalatability
Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2
    Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) by Boris C. Kondratieff, Paul A. Opler, Matthew C. Garhart, and Jason P. Schmidt C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 March 15, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration (top to bottom): Widow Skimmer (Libellula luctuosa) [photo ©Robert Behrstock], Stonefly (Perlesta species) [photo © David H. Funk, White- lined Sphinx (Hyles lineata) [photo © Matthew C. Garhart] ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Copyrighted 2004 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………….…1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………..…………………………………………….…3 OBJECTIVE………………………………………………………………………………………….………5 Site Descriptions………………………………………….. METHODS AND MATERIALS…………………………………………………………………………….5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………..…...11 Dragonflies………………………………………………………………………………….……..11
    [Show full text]
  • Hawk Moths of North America Is Richly Illustrated with Larval Images and Contains an Abundance of Life History Information
    08 caterpillars EUSA/pp244-273 3/9/05 6:37 PM Page 244 244 TULIP-TREE MOTH CECROPIA MOTH 245 Callosamia angulifera Hyalophora cecropia RECOGNITION Frosted green with shiny yellow, orange, and blue knobs over top and sides of body. RECOGNITION Much like preceding but paler or Dorsal knobs on T2, T3, and A1 somewhat globular and waxier in color with pale stripe running below set with black spinules. Paired knobs on A2–A7 more spiracles on A1–A10 and black dots on abdomen cylindrical, yellow; knob over A8 unpaired and rounded. lacking contrasting pale rings. Yellow abdominal Larva to 10cm. Caterpillars of larch-feeding Columbia tubercle over A8 short, less than twice as high as broad. Silkmoth (Hyalophora columbia) have yellow-white to Larva to 6cm. Sweetbay Silkmoth (Callosamia securifera) yellow-pink instead of bright yellow knobs over dorsum similar in appearance but a specialist on sweet bay. Its of abdomen and knobs along sides tend to be more white than blue (as in Cecropia) and are yellow abdominal tubercle over A8 is nearly three times as set in black bases (see page 246). long as wide and the red knobs over thorax are cylindrical (see page 246). OCCURRENCE Urban and suburban yards and lots, orchards, fencerows, woodlands, OCCURRENCE Woodlands and forests from Michigan, southern Ontario, and and forests from Canada south to Florida and central Texas. One generation with mature Massachusetts to northern Florida and Mississippi. One principal generation northward; caterpillars from late June through August over most of range. two broods in South with mature caterpillars from early June onward.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs
    INSECTS THAT FEED ON COLORADO TREES AND SHRUBS1 Whitney Cranshaw David Leatherman Boris Kondratieff Bulletin 506A TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFOLIATORS .................................................... 8 Leaf Feeding Caterpillars .............................................. 8 Cecropia Moth ................................................ 8 Polyphemus Moth ............................................. 9 Nevada Buck Moth ............................................. 9 Pandora Moth ............................................... 10 Io Moth .................................................... 10 Fall Webworm ............................................... 11 Tiger Moth ................................................. 12 American Dagger Moth ......................................... 13 Redhumped Caterpillar ......................................... 13 Achemon Sphinx ............................................. 14 Table 1. Common sphinx moths of Colorado .......................... 14 Douglas-fir Tussock Moth ....................................... 15 1. Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension etnomologist and associate professor, entomology; David Leatherman, entomologist, Colorado State Forest Service; Boris Kondratieff, associate professor, entomology. 8/93. ©Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. 1994. For more information, contact your county Cooperative Extension office. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
    [Show full text]
  • Moths of Ohio Guide
    MOTHS OF OHIO field guide DIVISION OF WILDLIFE This booklet is produced by the ODNR Division of Wildlife as a free publication. This booklet is not for resale. Any unauthorized INTRODUCTION reproduction is prohibited. All images within this booklet are copyrighted by the Division of Wildlife and it’s contributing artists and photographers. For additional information, please call 1-800-WILDLIFE. Text by: David J. Horn Ph.D Moths are one of the most diverse and plentiful HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE groups of insects in Ohio, and the world. An es- Scientific Name timated 160,000 species have thus far been cata- Common Name Group and Family Description: Featured Species logued worldwide, and about 13,000 species have Secondary images 1 Primary Image been found in North America north of Mexico. Secondary images 2 Occurrence We do not yet have a clear picture of the total Size: when at rest number of moth species in Ohio, as new species Visual Index Ohio Distribution are still added annually, but the number of species Current Page Description: Habitat & Host Plant is certainly over 3,000. Although not as popular Credit & Copyright as butterflies, moths are far more numerous than their better known kin. There is at least twenty Compared to many groups of animals, our knowledge of moth distribution is very times the number of species of moths in Ohio as incomplete. Many areas of the state have not been thoroughly surveyed and in some there are butterflies. counties hardly any species have been documented. Accordingly, the distribution maps in this booklet have three levels of shading: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Susceptibility of Catalpa, Chilopsis, and Hybrids to Powdery Mildew
    JOBNAME: horts 41#7 2006 PAGE: 1 OUTPUT: October 25 00:32:17 2006 tsp/horts/127877/01585 PLANT PATHOLOGY HORTSCIENCE 41(7):1629–1634. 2006. Desertwillow or desertcatalpa, Chilopsis D. Don., is a monotypic genus related to Catalpa Chilopsis Catalpa. Chilopsis linearis (Cav.) Sweet is a Susceptibility of , , and small to medium-sized tree with willow-like leaves and attractive flowers in summer found Hybrids to Powdery Mildew and in washes and arroyos in desert regions of the southwestern United States, from southern Catalpa Sphinx Larvae California to Texas, and south-central Mexico (Henrickson, 1985). The species and its culti- Richard T. Olsen1,4 and Thomas G. Ranney2 vars are grown throughout its native range and Department of Horticultural Science, Mountain Horticultural Crops adjacent regions and are valued for drought Research and Extension Center, North Carolina State University, Fletcher, tolerance and attractive flowers (Dirr, 1998; Henrickson, 1985; Tipton, 1987). NC 28732-9244 Catalpa and Chilopsis are very similar but Charles S. Hodges3 are differentiated by number of stamens, two in Catalpa vs. four in Chilopsis, and leaf Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, morphology, large ovate to cordate leaves in NC 27695-7616 Catalpa vs. linear to lanceolate leaves in Additional index words. ·Chitalpa tashkentensis, Macrocatalpa, Tecomeae, Bignoniaceae, Chilopsis. Traditional classifications have placed them in the large, pan-tropical tribe Erysiphe elevata, Ceratomia catalpae, disease resistance Tecomeae Endl. (Henrickson, 1985). How- Abstract. A diverse collection of germplasm representing 24 taxa from Catalpa sect. ever, this tribe was shown recently to be Catalpa Paclt and sect. Macrocatalpa Grisebach, Chilopsis D.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Catalpa: “The Fish Bait Tree”
    Southern Catalpa: “The Fish Bait Tree” by Dr. Kim D. Coder, School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia 12/99 The Southern catalpa (Catalpa bignonioides) tree is a common fixture along roadsides and in old yards. The big green leaves and distinctive long dangling fruits are noticeable from hundreds of yards. Although used in the past for a variety of wood-based products, today catalpa is used for shade trees and for growing a special caterpillar. This catalpa “worm” is prized by fishing enthusiast across the South. Family Ties The catalpa tree is a member of the Bignonia family (Bignoniaceae). This family contains more than 700 species scattered around the globe, primarily in tropical and sub-tropical regions. The family is represented by trees, shrubs and vines in North America. The trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans), cross vine (Bignonia capreolata), and two catalpa trees (Catalpa sp.) are the most recognized natives of this family in the Southeastern United States. The exotic Asiatic Paulownia tree is a member of this family and has been widely planted, now reproducing on its own. The catalpa genus (Catalpa) has 12 species spread across North America, the Caribbean basin, Eastern Asia and Japan. There are two common native catalpa trees in the United States. Catalpa speciosa is the larger and more northern growing of the two. Common names for this catalpa are Northern catalpa, Western catalpa, and catawba-tree. Catalpa bignonioides is the Southern catalpa. Other common names for this species is common catalpa, Eastern catalpa, Indian cigar, Indian bean, catawba, smoking bean, caterpil- lar tree, cigar tree, and fish bait tree.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT OLSEN, RICHARD THOMAS. Utilizing Polyploidy For
    ABSTRACT OLSEN, RICHARD THOMAS. Utilizing Polyploidy for Developing Improved Nursery Crops: Restoring Fertility in Wide Hybrids, Limiting Fertility of Invasive Species, Embryo Culture of Triploids, Pest Resistance, and Inheritance of Ornamental Traits. (Under the direction of Thomas G. Ranney.) Multiple projects were conducted to investigate the potential for developing a breeding program utilizing species of Catalpa Scop. and Chilopsis D. Don. The efficacy of oryzalin was evaluated for inducing polyploidy and restoring fertility in the sterile, intergeneric hybrid ×Chitalpa tashkentensis Elias & Wisura [Catalpa bignonioides Walt. x Chilopsis linearis (Cav.) Sweet] ‘Pink Dawn’. Submerging meristems in 150 µM oryzalin for up to 24 hours was effective at inducing tetraploids and cytochimeras. Pollen from the diploid cultivar was non-viable, but pollen from the polyploid stained and germinated as well as pollen from progenitor taxa. Polyploid ×Chitalpa were self- compatible yielding tetraploids when self pollinated and triploids when crossed with C. bignonioides, but reciprocal crosses with Chilopsis taxa failed. To increase recovery of triploids, we investigated germination of ovules and embryos at various harvest dates on Schenk and Hildebrandt (SH) basal salts supplemented with various medium components. Germination of triploid [(polyploid ×Chitalpa) x C. bignonioides] and tetraploid (selfed polyploid ×Chitalpa) embryos was greatest at 7 weeks after pollination -1 on SH with 20 g⋅L sucrose and ≥ 1 µM gibberellic acid (GA3). Triploids [Chilopsis linearis x (polyploid ×Chitalpa)] germinated < 5%. Additional studies were conducted to screen diverse taxa for resistance to powdery mildew (PM), Erysiphe elevata (Burr.) U. Braun & S. Takam, and catalpa sphinx larvae (CSL), Ceratomia catalpae (Boisduval). Twenty-four taxa from Catalpa (section Catalpa Paclt and Macrocatalpa Grisebach), Chilopsis, and ×Chitalpa were screened in 2004-05 for susceptibility to PM.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Phenologies of Louisiana Sphingidae
    jO/trnaZ of the Lepidopterists' Society 51(2). 1997. 156-175 DISTRIBUTION AND PHENOLOGIES OF LOUISIANA SPHINGIDAE VERNON ANTOINE BROU, JR. AND CHARLOTTE DOZAR BROU 74.320 Jack Loyd Road, Abita Springs, Louisiana 70420, USA ABSTRACT. The abundance, distribution, and flight periods for 55 species of Louisiana Sphingidae are presented, including plior literature records and new collecting data for 44 species taken over a 26-year period (1970 through 1995). Information is pro­ vided on the number of annual broods for .36 species, and dates of capture are plotted as one-year and composite graphs for 30 species. Additional key words: bait traps, hawkmoths, light traps, sphinx moths, voltinism. The first treatment of the family Sphingidae in Louisiana was pre­ sented by von Reizenstein (1863), who reported 33 species from the vicinity of New Orleans. Later, von Reizenstein (1881) and Ottolengui (1894) each tallied one additional species for the state, and subsequent published works during this century have gradually expanded the total by another dozen species (see Rothschild & Jordan 1903, Hine 1906, Clark 1917, Draudt 1931, Jung 1950, Merkl & pfrimmer 1955, pfrim­ mer 1957, Brou 1980, Covell 1984, Brou 1994). For some time, we have been monitoring and collecting adult Louisiana Sphingidae in order to produce a comprehensive state list and examine voltinism and variation in the abundance of adults from brood to brood. In the present paper, we discuss the results from 26 years of sampling, 1970 through 1995. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used ultraviolet light traps and fermenting bait traps to attract sphingids, logging approximately 416,000 light trap hours and 633,000 bait trap hours from 1970 through 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Prey Species Influences Culturable Gut Symbionts of a Generalist Predator Zachary Faulkner University of North Georgia
    Papers & Publications: Interdisciplinary Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume 4 Article 17 2015 Prey Species Influences Culturable Gut Symbionts of a Generalist Predator Zachary Faulkner University of North Georgia Evan Lampert University of North Georgia Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/papersandpubs Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Faulkner, Zachary and Lampert, Evan (2015) "Prey Species Influences Culturable Gut Symbionts of a Generalist Predator," Papers & Publications: Interdisciplinary Journal of Undergraduate Research: Vol. 4 , Article 17. Available at: http://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/papersandpubs/vol4/iss1/17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities (CURCA) at Nighthawks Open Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers & Publications: Interdisciplinary Journal of Undergraduate Research by an authorized editor of Nighthawks Open Institutional Repository. Prey Species Influences Culturable Gut Symbionts of a Generalist Predator Acknowledgments This research was supported by the University of North Georgia Biology Department and the Roberta Williams Laboratory Teaching Initiative Grant to E. Lampert and J. Morgan. Bill Lott, Stephanie Brandys, and Brittany Veloce helped collect and rear insects, and Ben Przygoda helped pour plates. Stephanie Brandys, Bonnie Welch, Dr. Davison Sangweme, and Dr. Jeanelle Morgan provided beneficial feedback on earlier versions
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Modern Threats to the Lepidoptera Fauna in The
    MODERN THREATS TO THE LEPIDOPTERA FAUNA IN THE FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM By THOMSON PARIS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 2011 Thomson Paris 2 To my mother and father who helped foster my love for butterflies 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my family who have provided advice, support, and encouragement throughout this project. I especially thank my sister and brother for helping to feed and label larvae throughout the summer. Second, I thank Hillary Burgess and Fairchild Tropical Gardens, Dr. Jonathan Crane and the University of Florida Tropical Research and Education center Homestead, FL, Elizabeth Golden and Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park, Leroy Rogers and South Florida Water Management, Marshall and Keith at Mack’s Fish Camp, Susan Casey and Casey’s Corner Nursery, and Michael and EWM Realtors Inc. for giving me access to collect larvae on their land and for their advice and assistance. Third, I thank Ryan Fessendon and Lary Reeves for helping to locate sites to collect larvae and for assisting me to collect larvae. I thank Dr. Marc Minno, Dr. Roxanne Connely, Dr. Charles Covell, Dr. Jaret Daniels for sharing their knowledge, advice, and ideas concerning this project. Fourth, I thank my committee, which included Drs. Thomas Emmel and James Nation, who provided guidance and encouragement throughout my project. Finally, I am grateful to the Chair of my committee and my major advisor, Dr. Andrei Sourakov, for his invaluable counsel, and for serving as a model of excellence of what it means to be a scientist.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Entomologist
    Vol. 34, No. 2 Fa II/Winter 2001 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST PUBLISHED BY THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Volume 34 No.2 ISSN 0090-0222 TABLE OF CONTENTS Commentary on Ametropus species (Ephemeroptera: Amertropodidae) in North America W. P. McCafferty....................................................................................................... 1 First record ofAxymyiidae (Diptera: Nematocera: Axymyioidea) from Wisconsin Daniel K. Young and Anneke Lisberg ........................................................................ 7 Checklist of identified Lepidoptera collected at Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio Roy W, Rings ............................................................................................................ 9 Dstribution of terrestrial isopods (Crustacea: Isopoda) throughout Michigan: early results Jennifer L. Stoyenoff ............................................................................................... 29 First Canadian record of Hexaco/a neoscatellae (Hymenoptera: Figitidae: Eucoilinae), a parasitoid of the shore fly, Scatella stagnalis Joshua C. Diamond, Vanessa A. Carney, Graeme D. Murphy, and Wayne R. Allen ...... 51 Hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) collected in Grand Traverse and adjacent counties, Michigan Andrew W. Douglass, Christopher B. Douglass, and John F. Douglass .......................... 55 Second location for two rare Odonata in Ohio, Nannothemis bella and Ladona iulia, (Odonata:
    [Show full text]