DOCSLIB.ORG

Accelerating Decarbonization of the U.S. Energy System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Accelerating Decarbonization of the U.S. Energy System Prepublication Copy – Subject to Further Editorial Correction Accelerating Decarbonization of the U.S. Energy System ADVANCE COPY NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE BEFORE February 2, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. ___________________________________________________________________________________ PLEASE CITE AS A REPORT OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF SCIENCES, ENGINEERING, AND MEDICINE Committee on Accelerating Decarbonization in the United States Board on Energy and Environmental Systems Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences A Consensus Study Report of PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 This activity was supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Heising-Simons Foundation, Quadrivium Foundation, Gates Ventures, ClearPath Foundation, and Incite Labs, with support from the National Academy of Sciences Thomas Lincoln Casey Fund, National Academy of Sciences Arthur L. Day Fund, and National Academy of Sciences Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Fund. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-XXXXX-X International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-XXXXX-X Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.17226/25932 Additional copies of this publication are available for sale from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu. Copyright 2021 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Suggested citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Accelerating Decarbonization of the U.S. Energy System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/25932. PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. John L. Anderson is president. The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president. The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine. Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.nationalacademies.org. PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION Consensus Study Reports published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine document the evidence-based consensus on the study’s statement of task by an authoring committee of experts. Reports typically include findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on information gathered by the committee and the committee’s deliberations. Each report has been subjected to a rigorous and independent peer-review process and it represents the position of the National Academies on the statement of task. Proceedings published by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine chronicle the presentations and discussions at a workshop, symposium, or other event convened by the National Academies. The statements and opinions contained in proceedings are those of the participants and are not endorsed by other participants, the planning committee, or the National Academies. For information about other products and activities of the National Academies, please visit www.nationalacademies.org/about/whatwedo. PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION COMMITTEE ON ACCELERATING DECARBONIZATION IN THE UNITED STATES: TECHNOLOGY, POLICY, AND SOCIETAL DIMENSIONS STEPHEN W. PACALA, NAS,1 Princeton University, Chair COLIN CUNLIFF, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation DANIELLE DEANE-RYAN, Libra Foundation KELLY SIMS GALLAGHER, Tufts University Fletcher School JULIA HAGGERTY, Montana State University, Bozeman CHRISTOPHER T. HENDRICKSON, NAE,2 Carnegie Mellon University JESSE D. JENKINS, Princeton University ROXANNE JOHNSON, BlueGreen Alliance TIMOTHY C. LIEUWEN, NAE, Georgia Institute of Technology VIVIAN LOFTNESS, Carnegie Mellon University CLARK A. MILLER, Arizona State University, Tempe WILLIAM A. PIZER, Duke University VARUN RAI, University of Texas, Austin ED RIGHTOR, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy ESTHER TAKEUCHI, NAE, Stony Brook University SUSAN F. TIERNEY, Analysis Group JENNIFER WILCOX, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Staff K. JOHN HOLMES, Study Director, Board Director/Scholar, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems ELIZABETH ZEITLER, Senior Program Officer, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems BRENT HEARD, Associate Program Officer, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems KASIA KORNECKI, Associate Program Officer, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems CATHERINE WISE, Associate Program Officer, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems MICHAELA KERXHALLI-KLEINFIELD, Research Associate, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems REBECCA DEBOER, Research Assistant, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems HEATHER LOZOWSKI, Financial Business Partner, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems CYNDI TRANG, Research Associate, Board on Health Care Services RANDY ATKINS, Director, Communications/Media, National Academy of Engineering (until July 2020) JENELL WALSH-THOMAS, Program Officer, Board on Environmental Change and Society MICAH HIMMEL, Senior Program Officer, Transportation Research Board DAVID BUTLER, Holloman Scholar, National Academy of Engineering NOTE: See Appendix B, Disclosure of Conflict(s) of Interest. 1 Member, National Academy of Sciences. 2 Member, National Academy of Engineering. PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION v BOARD ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS JARED COHON, NAE,1 Carnegie Mellon University, Chair VICKY BAILEY, Anderson Stratton Enterprises CARLA BAILO, Center for Automotive Research W. TERRY BOSTON, NAE, GridLiance GP, LLC, and Grid Protection Alliance DEEPAKRAJ DIVAN, NAE, Georgia Institute of Technology MARCIUS EXTAVOUR, XPRIZE KELLY SIMS GALLAGHER, Tufts University Fletcher School T.J. GLAUTHIER, TJ Glauthier Associates, LLC NAT GOLDHABER, Claremont Creek Ventures DENISE GRAY, LG Chem Michigan, Inc. JOHN KASSAKIAN, NAE, Massachusetts Institute of Technology BARBARA KATES-GARNICK, Tufts University DOROTHY ROBYN, Boston University JOSÉ SANTIESTEBAN, NAE, ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company ALEXANDER SLOCUM, NAE, Massachusetts Institute of Technology JOHN WALL, NAE, Cummins, Inc. (retired) ROBERT WEISENMILLER, California Energy Commission (former) Staff K. JOHN HOLMES, Director/Scholar ELIZABETH ZEITLER, Senior Program Officer BRENT HEARD, Associate Program Officer KASIA KORNECKI, Associate Program Officer CATHERINE WISE, Associate Program Officer MICHAELA KERXHALLI-KLEINFIELD, Research Associate REBECCA DEBOER, Research Assistant HEATHER LOZOWSKI, Financial Manager JAMES ZUCCHETTO, Senior Scientist 1 Member, National Academy of Engineering. PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION vi Preface Over the past two decades, increased understanding of the severity of impending climate change has coincided with rapid development of non-emitting energy technologies, including significant reductions in their costs. As a result, many nations, states, cities, and companies have recently indicated goals and are developing plans to transition to an energy system that emits zero net anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHGs), usually by midcentury. This timetable would allow the transition to take advantage of the natural turnover of long-lived capital stock (i.e., the 30-year lifetime of a gas power plant) and is consistent, if adopted globally, with limiting the global temperature increase to substantially less than 2 degrees Celsius. Because the energy system impacts so many aspects of society, a transition to net zero would have profound implications well beyond climate and energy, including economic competitiveness, increased employment, and improved human health. If done right, a transition to net zero might provide more and better-quality jobs, and economic benefits that exceed costs. A transition might also provide an opportunity to eliminate injustices that permeate our current energy system, such as the disproportionate exposure of historically marginalized groups to toxic fossil pollutants. Public support for a decades-long transition could be maintained only by fairly distributing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Investing in Transformative Change” Discussion Paper on Public-Private Co-Investment in Clean Energy Innovation
    Mission Innovation Public-Private Breakfast: “Investing in Transformative Change” Discussion Paper on Public-Private Co-Investment in Clean Energy Innovation 1.0 THE CASE FOR CO-INVESTMENT The Problem Despite progress to-date, observers – including the International Energy Agency (IEA),1 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),2 and the World Economic Forum (WEF)3 – have noted that the pace and scale of technological change and investment in clean energy need to go further faster in order to support the clean energy transition and provide affordable energy access to all. Clean energy technologies and solutions can address environmental and economic priorities; however, clean energy innovators are often confronted by financing gaps and regulatory barriers at key points in the innovation cycle.4 Although innovators in any sector may struggle to attract financing during this long transition from early concept to commercialization, these challenges are especially acute in the clean energy sphere, where energy systems are complex, capital intensive, and, at times, prone to slow and incremental change.5 Moreover, clean energy innovators often have high capital requirements that involve long time horizons to fully reach market potential.6 Innovative strategies and programs are necessary to lower risks for investment in clean energy solutions – from early stage of development to project finance. The Opportunity Leveraging the respective expertise of the public and private sectors can enable governments and business leaders to unlock investment and to move innovations from lab to market in an accelerated manner. Through strategic partnerships, governments can contribute technical expertise, de-risk unproven clean energy technologies, prompt action to revise regulations, and leverage their networks to crowd in private investment.
    [Show full text]
  • MI3-MI-2020-Solutions.Pdf
    SECTION 01 | ENERGY MI 2020 SOLUTIONS 3 RD MI MINISTERIAL 2018 1 Highlighting innovative solutions emerging from Mission Innovation member investments that have the greatest potential to significantly accelerate the delivery of clean and affordable energy by 2020 CONTENTS Foreword 04 Innovation Challenges 06 SECTION 01 Smart grids & energy storage 08 SECTION 02 Renewable Energy 26 SECTION 03 Fuels 44 SECTION 04 Transportation 60 SECTION 05 Buildings 70 SECTION 06 Industry 82 SECTION 07 Innovative financing 94 Delivering this transformation requires This publication global partnerships of governments highlights some of and the private sector, and Mission these success stories Innovation is one of the international from across the globe: the innovative community’s most important vehicles for HYBRIT project from Sweden, which is driving this forward. The UK is delighted using hydrogen to reduce CO2 emissions to be part of Mission Innovation and to from ironmaking to zero, and India’s be collaborating with partners around unique Micro Solar Dome device are just the world in pursuit of our common goal: two of the great examples that should accelerating the clean energy revolution. inspire us all. Mission Innovation is also about But there is more work for us to do. coming together to celebrate our We must harness the ingenuity and FOREWORD successes. I am proud to say that since determination of scientists and engineers 1990 the UK has reduced emissions by in universities and industry across over forty per cent while growing our the globe, to continue to drive the economy by over seventy per cent, phenomenal progress made to date, outperforming the rest of the G7.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Regional Opportunities in the U.S. for Clean Energy Technology Innovation Volume 1
    About the Cover The images on the cover represent regional capabilities and resources of energy technology innovation across the United States from nuclear energy to solar and photovoltaics, and smart grid electricity to clean coal and carbon capture. Disclaimer This volume is one of two volumes and was written by the Department of Energy. This volume summarizes the results of university-hosted regional forums on regional clean energy technology innovation. The report draws on the proceedings and reports produced by the universities noted in Volume 2 for some of its content; as a result, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the views of the Department or the Administration. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. Message from the Secretary of Energy The U.S. Department of Energy (Department or DOE) is pleased to present this report, Exploring Regional Opportunities in the U.S. for Clean Energy Technology Innovation. The report represents DOE’s summary of the insights gained through fourteen university-hosted workshop events held nationwide during the spring and summer of 2016. These events brought together members of Congress, governors, other federal, state, tribal, and local officials, academic leaders, private sector energy leaders, DOE officials, and other stakeholders from economic development organizations and nongovernmental organizations to examine clean energy technology innovation from a regional perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tech-Enabled Energy Future Transition by Design
    DISCUSSION PAPER The Tech-Enabled Energy Future Transition by Design Amy Myers Jaffe March 2019 This paper was made possible through a generous grant from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, busi- ness executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR carries out its mission by maintaining a diverse membership, including special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; convening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and prominent thinkers come together with CFR members to discuss and debate ma- jor international issues; supporting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce articles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign pol- icy issues and make concrete policy recommendations; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal of international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; sponsoring Independent Task Forces that produce reports with both findings and policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics; and providing up-to-date information and analysis about world events and American foreign policy on its website, CFR.org. The Council on Foreign Relations takes no institutional positions on policy issues and has no affilia- tion with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • MI-Country-Highlights-2019.Pdf
    MISSION INNOVATION COUNTRY HIGHLIGHTS 4TH MI MINISTERIAL 2019 CONTENTS IntroDUCTION 1 Introduction 02 Mission Innovation (MI) Members agreed to provide information on strategies and plans for their respective governmental and/or state-directed clean energy research and development investment Australia 03 over five years. New investments are focused on transformational clean energy technology Austria 06 innovations that can be scaled to varying economic and energy market conditions that exist in participating countries and in the broader world. Brazil 10 Information-sharing promotes transparency and integrity. It allows for broad stakeholder Canada 12 engagement, gives rise to opportunities for collaboration, and can inspire and inform investment Chile 16 decisions by the private sector. China 18 Accordingly, MI Members have shared narratives, available on the MI website, describing the nature Denmark 20 of their clean energy research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) investments; current strategies and priorities for engagement in Mission Innovation. European Commission 22 Finland 25 MI Members initially submitted narrative and funding information prior to the Inaugural MI Ministerial in June 2016. They submitted updated information in November 2016, at the one-year France 28 anniversary of the MI launch in Paris then prior to the Second MI Ministerial (June 2017) and Third MI Ministerial (May 2018). Once again, MI members have submitted information prior to the Fourth Germany 32 MI Ministerial in Vancouver, Canada in May 2019. This updated information focuses on key highlights India 36 over the past year including recent developments in members plans, policies and strategies, Indonesia innovation successes, activities delivered in support of the Innovation Challenges, public sector 41 RD&D investment and new collaborations.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Progress Report on the Energy Transition the Energy of the Future
    Second Progress Report on the Energy Transition The Energy of the Future Reporting Year 2017 Imprint Publisher Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy Public Relations Division 11019 Berlin www.bmwi.de Current as at June 2019 Design PRpetuum GmbH, 80801 Munich Image credits Adobe Stock / BillionPhotos.com / title BELECTRIC / p. 183 Getty AdrianHancu / title, Adrian Weinbrecht / p. 10, Apexphotos / p. 168, artpartner-images / p. 32, Bengt Geijerstam / p. 122, CasarsaGuru / p. 203, DEA / ALBERT CEOLAN / p. 162, Erik Isakson / title, ETIENNE LAURENT / p. 28, Fancy/Veer/Corbis u. Classen Rafael / EyeEm / p. 95, Florian Gaertner / p. 110, gerenme / title, instamatics / p. 44, James O‘Neil / p. 132, Jana Leon / p. 158, Johannes Heuckeroth / p. 192, Johner Images / p. 49, 104, Justin Case / p. 26, jxfzsy / p. 153, Kay Fochtmann / EyeEm / p. 57, Maskot / p. 103, 113, Michael Moeller / EyeEm / p. 121, Malorny / p. 128, MirageC / p. 209, Monty Rakusen / p. 134, 175, Nattawit Sreerung / p. 116, nbehmans / p. 146, Pley / p. 119, Portra / p. 68, redmal / title, Reed Kaestner / p. 188, Richard Nowitz / title, seksan Mongkhonkhamsao / p. 142, serts / p. 58, Siegfried Kaiser / EyeEm / p. 139, 178, Silvia Otte / p. 171,Spiderplay / p. 114, Stockwerk-Fotodesign / p. 97, Symbiont / p. 161, Terry Williams / p. 22, the_burtons / p. 130, ThomasVogel / p. 34, Thomas Trutschel / p. 94, Thomas Winz / p. 165, You can obtain this and other brochures from: Twinpix / p. 148, Ute Grabowski/Photothek / p. 78, Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, Watchara Kokram / EyeEm / p. 211, Public Relations Division Westend61 / title, p. 64, 88, 155, 206, Yagi Studio / p.
    [Show full text]
  • Converting Sunlight Into Solar Fuels and Chemicals Roadmap 2020–2050
    Innovation Challenge 5: Converting Sunlight into Solar Fuels and Chemicals Roadmap 2020–2050 February 2021 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 1. The Role of Mission Innovation Challenge 5 in the Global Context 6 1.1. Climate Change and the Paris Agreement 6 1.2. Solar Fuels as an Important Enabler for a Clean Energy Transition 7 1.3. Solar Fuels Can Address Global Challenges and Opportunities 9 2. A Vision for Solar Fuels and Solar Chemicals – The Value Chain for Converting Sunlight 11 2.1. Feedstocks and Materials 11 2.2. The Conversion of Solar Energy to Fuels and Chemicals 13 2.3. Products and Downstream Processes 14 3. At the Core of the Roadmap for Converting Sunlight – Solar Fuels Conversion Technologies 15 3.1. Reference Technology: Photovoltaic Electrolysis and Synthesis Technologies 17 3.2. The Case for Direct Solar-Driven Production of Net-Zero Carbon Hydrogen 18 3.3. Catalyst Development for Water Splitting, CO2 Reduction, and Other Key Reactions 19 3.4. Improved Solar Light Harvesting, Charge Separation, and Coupling to Catalysts 20 3.5. Photoelectrochemical and Photocatalytic Devices 21 3.6. Photobiological and Biohybrid Approaches 23 3.7. Thermochemical Pathways Using Concentrated Sunlight 25 4. The Roadmap for System Integration 28 4.1. The Upstream Interface with Industrial Feedstock Streams 28 4.2. The Downstream Interface with Fuel and Chemical Industries and Infrastructures 29 4.3. Design, Engineering, and Demonstration at System Level 30 4.4. Integration of Solar Fuels Technology with Other Technologies 31 5. Solar Fuels within a Green Circular Economy 32 6.
    [Show full text]
  • MI Country Highlights 2020
    MISSION INNOVATION COUNTRY HIGHLIGHTS 5TH MI MINISTERIAL 2020 CONTENTS Introduction 02 Australia 03 Austria 06 Brazil 10 Canada 13 Chile 17 China 20 Denmark 23 European Commission 26 Finland 30 France 33 Germany 39 India 43 Indonesia 52 Italy 53 Japan 57 Mexico 61 Morocco 62 Netherlands 65 Norway 72 Republic of Korea 75 Saudi Arabia 78 Sweden 80 United Arab Emirates 84 United Kingdom 89 United States 95 Annex A 97 1 INTRODUCTION Mission Innovation (MI) Members1 agreed to provide information on strategies and plans for their respective governmental and/or state-directed clean energy research and development investment over five years. New investments are focused on transformational clean energy technology innovations that can be scaled to varying economic and energy market conditions that exist in participating countries and in the broader world. Information-sharing promotes transparency and integrity. It allows for broad stakeholder engagement, gives rise to opportunities for collaboration, and can inspire and inform investment decisions by the private sector. Accordingly, MI Members have shared narratives, available on the MI website, describing the nature of their clean energy research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) investments; current strategies and priorities for engagement in Mission Innovation. MI Members initially submitted narrative and funding information prior to the Inaugural MI Ministerial in June 2016. They submitted updated information in November 2016, at the one-year anniversary of the MI launch in Paris then prior to the Second MI Ministerial (June 2017), Third MI Ministerial (May 2018) and Fourth MI Ministerial (May 2019). Once again, MI members have submitted information prior to the Fifth MI Ministerial hosted by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in September 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Transportation Drew Kodjak
    CONGRESSIONAL PROGRAM Energy for America: Opportunities, Challenges and Solutions August 9 – 15, 2017 Oslo, Norway Copyright @ 2017 by The Aspen Institute The Aspen Institute One Dupont Circle, NW Washington, DC 20036-1133 Published in the United States of America in 2017 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Pub #17/016 ISBN: 0-89843-669-9 Energy for America: Opportunities, Challenges and Solutions August 9 – 15, 2017 The Aspen Institute Congressional Program Table of Contents Rapporteur’s Summary Marika Nell ................................................................................................................................................. 3 How a Major Oil Company Positions Itself in a World of Low Oil Prices, Changing Technology, and Public Policy Demands Lars Christian Bacher ............................................................................................................................... 11 The Tipping Point: How America Can Lead the Transition to a Prosperous Clean Energy Economy Eric D. Beinhocker .................................................................................................................................... 17 Navigating the Turbulence of the Global Energy System Arun Majumdar ......................................................................................................................................... 25 Lessons Learned from the EU and the German Energiewende Camilla Bausch and Katharina Umpfenbach ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Energizing America a Roadmap to Launch a National Energy Innovation Mission
    A plan to make the United States the world leader in “ clean energy innovation and rise to an existential challenge—creating exciting new jobs along the way. —John F. Kerry, 68th US Secretary of State ” Energizing America A Roadmap to Launch a National Energy Innovation Mission Varun Sivaram, Colin Cunliff, David Hart, Julio Friedmann, and David Sandalow Energizing America A Roadmap to Launch a National Energy Innovation Mission Copyright © 2020 by the Columbia University SIPA Center on Global Energy Policy All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form beyond the reproduction permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law Act (17 U.S.C. Sections 107 and 108) and excerpts by reviewers for the public press, without express written permission from the Columbia University SIPA Center on Global Energy Policy. Library of Congress Control Number: 2020917122 ISBN: 978-0-578-75852-7 ABOUT THE CENTER ON GLOBAL ENERGY POLICY The Columbia University SIPA Center on Global Energy Policy provides independent, balanced, data-driven analysis to help policymakers navigate the complex world of energy. We approach energy as an economic, security, and environmental concern. And we draw on the resources of a world-class institution, faculty with real-world experience, and a location in the world’s finance and media capital. For more information, please visit www.energypolicy.columbia.edu ABOUT THE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS The mission of the Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) is to empower people to serve the global public interest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Next Generation of Federal Clean Electricity Tax Credits
    THE NEXT GENERATION OF FEDERAL CLEAN ELECTRICITY TAX CREDITS BY VARUN SIVARAM AND NOAH KAUFMAN MAY 2019 The federal tax incentive for wind energy expires at the end of 2019, and the incentive for solar energy will begin phasing out in 2020. Over multiple decades, these policies have succeeded in promoting the development and deployment of wind and solar technology, which today are rapidly gaining market share in the US electricity sector. But it would be a mistake to declare “mission accomplished” and assume no successor policies are needed. After all, well over half of US electricity is still produced by fossil fuels that release climate-warming carbon dioxide and toxic local air pollutants into the atmosphere. It would also be a mistake to simply extend today’s incentives indefinitely into the future. These policies have ballooned in cost and are ill suited to spur innovation that would improve upon the existing set of technology options for reducing US carbon emissions. Federal policy makers should design a new generation of tax incentives as one element of a national plan to decarbonize the US electricity sector almost entirely by midcentury—an integral step in decarbonizing the overall economy to combat climate change. In recent months, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have proposed new tax credits for a wide range of clean electricity technologies through proposals such as Democratic Senator Ron Wyden’s Clean Energy for America Act and Republican Congressman Tom Reed’s Energy Sector Innovation Credit Act. Importantly, tax incentives are no silver bullet. Even carefully designed tax incentives will have drawbacks; for example, tax incentives are inherently less efficient than direct federal spending at transmitting incentives to the private sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Five-Year Anniversary
    FIVE-YEAR ANNIVERSARY Special Edition Newsletter November 30, 2020 Contents Mission Innovation celebrates 5 years .......................................................................................... 2 Looking Back: Four Years of Collaboration through MI’s Innovation Challenges ................................... 3 Mission Innovation Champions: creating a community of visionaries from around the world ................ 5 Student Energy celebrates MI’s anniversary!.................................................................................. 7 Austria celebrates Mission Innovation’s 5-year anniversary.............................................................. 9 Brazil celebrates Mission Innovation’s 5-year anniversary ...............................................................11 Canada celebrates five years of collaboration under Mission Innovation ...........................................12 Chile celebrates Mission Innovation’s 5-year anniversary................................................................14 China celebrates Mission Innovation’s 5-year anniversary...............................................................15 Denmark celebrates Mission Innovation’s 5-year anniversary..........................................................17 European Union celebrates Mission Innovation’s 5-year anniversary: Successful collaboration ............18 Finland celebrates Mission Innovation’s 5-year anniversary ............................................................21 Germany celebrates Mission Innovation’s 5-year
    [Show full text]