Appendix H – Noise Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix H – Noise Report Appendix H – Noise Report H-1 DRAFT Technical Report THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY AIRPORT Master Plan Update Noise Contour Development Prepared for November 2018 Woolpert Inc. DRAFT Technical Report THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY AIRPORT Master Plan Update Noise Contour Development Prepared for November 2018 Woolpert Inc. 550 West C Street Suite 750 San Diego, CA 92101 619.719.4200 www.esassoc.com Bend Oakland San Francisco Camarillo Orlando Santa Monica Delray Beach Pasadena Sarasota Destin Petaluma Seattle IrvineIrvine Portland Sunrise Los Angeles Sacramento Tampa Miami San Diego D160608.00 OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY | ESA helps a variety of public and private sector clients plan and prepare for climate change and emerging regulations that limit GHG emissions. ESA is a registered assessor with the California Climate Action Registry, a Climate Leader, and founding reporter for the Climate Registry. ESA is also a corporate member of the U.S. Green Building Council and the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3). Internally, ESA has adopted a Sustainability Vision and Policy Statement and a plan to reduce waste and energy within our operations. This document was produced using recycled paper. TABLE OF CONTENTS OSU Master Plan Update Noise Contour Development Page 1.0 - Introduction and Overview ............................................................................................. 1 2.0 - 2037 Forecasted Aircraft Operations ........................................................................... 1 3.0 - Aircraft Fleet Mix ............................................................................................................. 1 4.0 - Stage Lengths .................................................................................................................. 1 5.0 - Time of Day ...................................................................................................................... 2 6.0 - Runway Use ..................................................................................................................... 3 7.0 - Flight Track and Flight Track Use Percentages ........................................................... 3 8.0 - 2037 DNL Contours ......................................................................................................... 4 Appendices A. Aircraft Operational Information ................................................................................... 5 List of Tables 1 Day-Night Percentages ................................................................................................. 2 2 Runway Use .................................................................................................................. 3 A-1 2037 Annual Average Day Aircraft Operations ............................................................. 6 A-2 Flight Track Use – Jet ................................................................................................. 11 A-3 Flight Track Use – Turboprop and Multi-Engine Piston – Daytime ............................ 13 A-4 Flight Track Use – Turboprop and Multi-Engine Piston – Nighttime .......................... 14 A-5 Flight Track Use – Single-Engine Piston .................................................................... 16 A-6 Flight Track Use – Helicopter ...................................................................................... 17 A-7 Flight Track Use – Multi- and Single-Engine Piston – Touch and Go ........................ 17 A-8 Flight Track Use – Helicopter – Track and Go ............................................................ 18 The Ohio State University Airport ESA / Project No. 160608.00 Master Plan Update Noise Contour Development i November 2018 The Ohio State University Airport List of Figures Figure 1 2037 DNL Contour Map ........................................................................................... 19 Figure A-1 Jet Arrival Flight Tracks – East Flow ..................................................................... 20 Figure A-2 Jet Arrival Flight Tracks – West Flow .................................................................... 21 Figure A-3 Jet Departure Flight Tracks – East Flow ............................................................... 22 Figure A-4 Jet Departure Flight Tracks – West Flow .............................................................. 23 Figure A-5 Turboprop/Multi-/Single-Engine Piston Arrival Flight Tracks – East Flow ............ 24 Figure A-6 Turboprop/Multi-/Single-Engine Piston Arrival Flight Tracks – West Flow ........... 25 Figure A-7 Turboprop/Multi-/Single-Engine Piston Departure Flight Tracks – East Flow .......................................................................................................................... 26 Figure A-8 Turboprop/Multi-/Single-Engine Piston Departure Flight Tracks – West Flow .......................................................................................................................... 27 Figure A-9 Helicopter Arrival Flight Tracks .............................................................................. 28 Figure A-10 Helicopter Departure Flight Tracks ...................................................................... 29 Figure A-11 Multi-/Single-Engine Piston Touch and Go Flight Tracks – East Flow ............... 30 Figure A-12 Multi-/Single-Engine Piston Touch and Go Flight Tracks – West Flow .............. 31 Figure A-13 Helicopter Touch and Go Flight Tracks – East Flow ........................................... 32 Figure A-14 Helicopter Touch and Go Flight Tracks – West Flow .......................................... 33 The Ohio State University Airport ii ESA / Project No. 160608.00 Master Plan Update Noise Contour Development November 2018 THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY AIRPORT Master Plan Update Noise Contour Development 1.0 Introduction and Overview This report provides an analysis and overview of the noise modeling data preparation and resulting Day-Night Average Sound Level (DNL) contours for the future year 2037 at The Ohio State University Airport (OSU). This noise analysis was prepared as a part of the OSU Airport Master Plan Update (MPU) project. The FAA’s Aviation Environmental Design Tool version 2d (AEDT 2d) was used to develop the DNL contours for this project. The DNL contours were prepared using the forecasted aircraft activity for the OSU MPU. A detailed discussion of the model inputs used to develop these contours is included in the following sections. 2.0 2037 Forecasted Aircraft Operations The number of 2037 aircraft operations was forecasted to be 112,000, which was broken into 66,100 itinerant operations and 45,900 local operations. The definition of the local operation is aircraft operations that stays the traffic pattern known as touch-and-go operations. Itinerant operations mean aircraft operations other than local operations. 3.0 Aircraft Fleet Mix The MPU forecast provided a comprehensive list of aircraft that are expected to utilize OSU for in calendar year 2037. This list was used to determine equivalent AEDT aircraft for the purposes of developing DNL contours. In determining the AEDT equivalent aircraft for the purposes of noise modeling, research was conducted by aircraft type to determine the specific airframe, engine codes, and engine modification codes of the expected 2037 aircraft fleet. The AEDT fleet mix was developed and is presented in Appendix A . 4.0 Stage Lengths Once the specific fleet mix was completed, departure destination information was analyzed to determine departure stage lengths. An aircraft’s stage length (or trip length) refers to the distance an aircraft flies from its origin airport (OSU) to its intended destination. Stage length is important in noise modeling since the longer the distance an aircraft will fly to its destination, the greater the fuel load required and overall weight and, as a result, the lower its departure profile will be. Stage lengths used in the AEDT include the following stages: The Ohio State University Airport ESA / Project No. 160608.00 Master Plan Update Noise Contour Development 1 November 2018 The Ohio State University Airport Stage Length 1: 0 to 500 miles Stage Length 2: 500 to 1,000 miles Stage Length 3: 1,001 to 1,500 miles Stage Length 4: 1,501 to 2,500 miles Stage Length 5: 2,501 to 3,500 miles Stage Length 6: 3,501 to 4,500 miles Stage Length 7: 4,501 to 5,500 miles Stage Length 8: 5,501 to 6,500 miles Stage Length 9: 6,500+ miles Three aircraft were identified other than the Stage Length of 1. All of Bombardier Global 5000 Business and Bombardier Global Express were modeled as Stage Length 3 and 2, respectively. 97.5% of Eclipse 500 were modeled as Stage Length 2, while 2.5% of Eclipse 500 were modeled as Stage Length 1. 5.0 Time of Day Another important component in developing the DNL contours is determining the day-night use percentages for each AEDT aircraft. This data is important because the DNL metric is a 24-hour, time-weighted energy average. The time-weighting refers to the fact that noise events occurring during certain noise sensitive time periods receive a penalty. For the DNL metric, noise events occurring between the hours of 10:00:00 p.m. and 6:59:59 a.m. receive a 10-dB “penalty”. This penalty attempts to account for the higher sensitivity to noise in the nighttime and the expected decrease in background noise levels at night in comparison with background noise levels during the day. Because noise is measured on a logarithmic scale, a 10-dB penalty means each nighttime noise
Recommended publications
  • Aviation Activity Forecasts
    SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON REGIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN Chapter 3 – Aviation Activity Forecasts The overall goal of aviation activity forecasting is to provide reasonable projections of future activity that can be translated into specific airport facility needs anticipated during the next twenty years and beyond. The first draft of this chapter was prepared in January 2018. Following FAA review, several revisions have been made, including updated based aircraft and aircraft operations forecasts. The original forecasts are maintained as originally presented for reference. Overview and Purpose This chapter provides updated aviation activity forecasts for Southwest Washington Regional Airport (KLS) for the twenty-year master plan horizon (2017-2037). The most recent Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved aviation activity forecasts for KLS were developed for the 2007-2027 planning period in the 2011 Airport Master Plan update. The forecasts presented in this chapter are consistent with the current and historic role of KLS as a regional general aviation airport, capable of accommodating a wide range of activity, including business class turboprops and jets. The well-documented shortage of public use airports in Southwest Washington with comparable capabilities, highlights the importance of recognizing the regional role of KLS in its current and long term planning. CHAPTER 3 - AVIATION ACTIVITY FORECASTS | DECEMBER 2020 | PAGE 3-1 SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON REGIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN The forecasts of activity are unconstrained and assume the City of Kelso will be able to make the facility improvements necessary to accommodate the anticipated demand, unless specifically noted. The City of Kelso will consider if any unconstrained demand will not or cannot be reasonably met through the evaluation of airport development alternatives later in the master plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision 2005/07/R
    DECISION No 2005/07/R OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE AGENCY of 19-12-2005 amending Decision No 2003/19/RM of 28 November 2003 on acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation (hereinafter referred to as the Basic Regulation) and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency1 (hereinafter referred to as the “Agency”), and in particular Articles 13 and 14 thereof. Having regard to the Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 28 November 2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks.2 Whereas: (1) Annex IV Acceptable Means of Compliance to Part- 66 Appendix 1 Aircraft type ratings for Part-66 aircraft maintenance licence (hereinafter referred to as Part-66 AMC Appendix I) is required to be up to date to serve as reference for the national aviation authorities. (2) To achieve this requirement the text of Part-66 AMC Appendix I should be amended regularly to add new aircraft type rating. (3) The regular amendment of Part-66 AMC Appendix I is considered as a permanent rulemaking task for the Agency. This decision represents the first update according to an accelerated procedure accepted by AGNA and SSCC.
    [Show full text]
  • EVAS® MODEL ELIGIBILITY LIST for Model 107STC
    EVAS® MODEL ELIGIBILITY LIST for Model 107STC This eligibility list is a controlled document from VisionSafe Corporation, manufacturer of EVAS® under PMA PQ1885NM. This list is used to determine which EVAS® model corresponds to which aircraft model(s). Applicable foreign STCs are also noted. The eligibility list can also be found on the certification page of our website, www.visionsafe.com. For questions, please contact VisionSafe Corporation Quality Assurance: [email protected] or 808-235-0849 Log of Revisions Revision Date Description Original 13-Dec-07 Original release, eligibility: STC by EVAS™ Model Number (page 1); STC by Aircraft Model Name (page 2); portable* by EVAS™ Model Number (page 4); portable* by Aircraft Model Name (page 4) A 7-May-08 Added EASA approval for Hawker Beechcraft 400A; Embraer 145(); Dassault Falcon 7X B 26-Jun-08 Added FAA and TCCA approval for Hawker Beechcraft Hawker 750, 850XP, 900XP; Embraer ERJ 190-100 STD, LR, IGW C 2-Dec-08 Added portable* models for Boeing 707-300; Dassault Falcon 20 D 27-Mar-09 Added portable* models for Learjet 55; page 5** for Projects in Process E 30-Jun-09 Added column for ANAC (Brazil) approval for Gulfstream G-1159A, G-IV, GV, GV-SP F 10-Jul-09 Added EASA approval for Cessna 680 G 27-Aug-09 Added portable* models for Cessna 525 H 19-Mar-10 Added column for ANAC Argentina approval for Bombardier CL-600-1A11, -2A12, -2B16, -2B19, -2C10, -2D15, -2D24 I 17-May-10 Updated aircraft list for EASA approval of Embraer 135 & 145 J 12-Jul-10 Added ANAC Brazil approval for Gulfstream GIV-X K 22-Jul-10 Added EASA approval for BD-100-1A10 L 24-Sep-10 *Portable models (pages 3 & 4) moved to VS QC-Form 43.
    [Show full text]
  • CONQUEST II Inspections and Upgrades Will Cost You, but You’Ll Wind up with a Highly Efficient Twin-Engine Turboprop
    USED JET REVIEW CESSNA 441 CONQUEST II inspections and upgrades will cost you, but you’ll wind up with a highly efficient twin-engine turboprop _by Mark Huber T F A R C R I A A N S S E C 44 I BJT october_november 2008 USED JET REVIEW economics HOURLY DIRECT OPERATING COSTS – Fuel ($5.92 per gal): $526.88 – Maintenance labor (at $81 per hour): $192.88 – Parts, airframe, engine, avionics: $146.52 – Inspections, component overhauls, engine restoration: $138.44 – Misc. expenses Landing and parking fees: $8.13 Crew expenses: $30 Supplies & catering: $24 TOTAL VARIABLE FLIGHT COSTS PER HOUR: $1,111.31 Average speed: 270 knots THE CESSNA 441’S CABIN N O – Cost per nautical mile: $4.12 I T A HAS EXECUTIVE SEATING FOR I V A ANNUAL FIXED OPERATING COSTS SEVEN, THOUGH YOU CAN R A T S CRAM IN 11 PASSENGERS. – Crew salaries (estimates) T S E Captain: $79,300 W Copilot: $41,200 Benefits: $36,150 AIRPLANES COME APART IN MIDAIR for a variety of 404 and the 421–into turboprops. The 441 is the larg- – Hangar rental (typical): $20,900 reasons. An errant pilot loses control or flies a model er of the two; the other is the Model 425 Conquest I. – Insurance (insured hull value = $1.735 million) past its design limit, or unrepaired cracks and corro- The 441 has executive seating for seven, although you Hull (1.02% of value): $17,697 sion cause structure to fail. Fortunately, rigorous pilot can cram in nine passengers; it also has a top speed Admitted liability: $4,000 training and aircraft maintenance standards make of 295 knots–higher with a popular engine modifica- Legal liability: $12,250 such events few and far between.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Washoe County Emissions Inventory Page I
    WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA 2011 PERIODIC EMISSIONS INVENTORY November 2012 Prepared by: Ms. Yann Ling-Barnes, P.E. Mr. Craig A. Petersen Mr. Brendan Schnieder Washoe County Health District Air Quality Management Division P.O. Box 11130 Reno, Nevada 89520 This page intentionally left blank ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Air Quality Management Division of the Washoe County Health District wishes to extend its appreciation to the following organizations and local agencies for their assistance in completing this emission inventory: Amtrak City of Reno Fire Department City of Reno, Reno/Stead Water Reclamation Facility City of Sparks Fire Department City of Reno Public Works Department City of Sparks Public Works Department Incline Village General Improvement District North Lake Tahoe Fire Protection District NV Energy Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority Sierra Fire Protection District Southwest Gas Cooperation State of Nevada, Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Petroleum Technology State of Nevada, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Protection State of Nevada, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry State of Nevada, Department of Motor Vehicles and Public Safety State of Nevada, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of State Lands State of Nevada, Department of Transportation The Nature Conservancy Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility Union Pacific Railroad United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Winnemucca District United States Fish & Wildlife Service, Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge United States Forest Service, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Washoe County, Department of Community Development Washoe County, Department of Public Works Washoe County, Department of Water Resources TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Hartzell Top Prop Performance Conversions
    T O P P R Beech 33, 35 Bonanza and Debonair O With IO-470-C, -J, -K, -N engine P P E R F O R M A N C E Basic Kit: Part Number: L2F00015STP 1 2-Bladed Propeller: BHC-L2YF-1BF/F8468AR 1 Polished Spinner: A-2295-P C 1 STC Document Set: SA818CE O Kit with Continental Oil Plug: (May be required for some IO-470-C, -N w/Beech N Props) Part Number: L2F00015STP*1 V 1 2-Bladed Propeller: BHC-L2YF-1BF/F8468AR 1 Polished Spinner: A-2295-P E 1 Continental Oil Plug: 633189 1 STC Document Set: SA818CE R S I O __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Aircraft Serial and registration numbers required when ordering N All Prices FOB Hartzell Propeller Inc. Prices do not include Ohio State Sales Tax Installation and Dynamic Balancing available at an additional charge S Telephone: (937) 778-5726 Option 2 / (800) 942-7767 Option 2 Fax: (937) 778-4215 Internet: www.hartzellprop.com Email: [email protected] T O P P R O BEECH BONANZA/DEBONAIR w. IO-470 ENGINE P Applicable Models: 35-33, 35-A33, 35-B33, 35-C33, E33, F33, G33, J35, K35, M35, N35, P35 * Note: A governor change may be required in some cases. P * Note: On earlier model aircraft with the IO-470-C engine an oil transfer tube or an oil plug may be required. The oil transfer E tube is NO LONGER AVAILABLE. R Specifications: 84 inch diameter 2-bladed, aluminum hub propeller 2400 hour / 6 year TBO F 58 pounds (prop & spinner) diameter reduction allowable to 82.5 inches O Replaces: Beech 273 / 278 - 82 inch dia.
    [Show full text]
  • Beavertales 08 2020
    July 2020 Edition And what if you don’t have a PayPal account, but would like to pay with a credit card? It’s easy... As you work your way through the IPMS Canada re- newal page, you will see a notice that reads: Pay via PayPal; you can pay with your credit card if you don’t have a PayPal account. Note: If you don’t have a PayPal account, choose the “Create Account” button when you see it and enter your information. Then, as long as you don’t check the “Save my payment info In the last beaveRTales we encouraged all mem- and create a PayPal account” box, no account bers who are renewing their membership to do so will be created. through our website using the PayPal link. You don’t need a PayPal account if you don’t have one, as you So when you receive your renewal notification, either can use any credit card with PayPal. One member by email or in your RT, go to www.ipmscanada.com emailed expressing concerns about the possibility of to renew easily and quickly. And with no envelope, his financial information being hacked if he did this. no cheque-writing bank fee, and no postage, you’ll According to PayPal’s website… also save a couple of bucks! “PayPal’s website is secure and encrypted. As long as you have a secure connection to the legiti- mate PayPal site, any information you exchange is hidden from prying eyes. PayPal uses industry- standard security features that you’d expect from any large financial institution, and the company even offers financial rewards to “white hat” hackers who discover vulnerabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Library 
    Interagency Aviation Training Aircraft Library Disclaimer: The information provided in the Aircraft Library is intended to provide basic information for mission planning purposes and should NOT be used for flight planning. Due to variances in Make and Model, along with aircraft configuration and performance variability, it is necessary acquire the specific technical information for an aircraft from the operator when planning a flight. Revised: June 2021 Interagency Aviation Training—Aircraft Library This document includes information on Fixed-Wing aircraft (small, large, air tankers) and Rotor-Wing aircraft/Helicopters (Type 1, 2, 3) to assist in aviation mission planning. Click on any Make/Model listed in the different categories to view information about that aircraft. Fixed-Wing Aircraft - SMALL Make /Model High Low Single Multi Fleet Vendor Passenger Wing Wing engine engine seats Aero Commander XX XX XX 5 500 / 680 FL Aero Commander XX XX XX 7 680V / 690 American Champion X XX XX 1 8GCBC Scout American Rockwell XX XX 0 OV-10 Bronco Aviat A1 Husky XX XX X XX 1 Beechcraft A36/A36TC XX XX XX 6 B36TC Bonanza Beechcraft C99 XX XX XX 19 Beechcraft XX XX XX 7 90/100 King Air Beechcraft 200 XX XX XX XX 7 Super King Air Britten-Norman X X X 9 BN-2 Islander Cessna 172 XX XX XX 3 Skyhawk Cessna 180 XX XX XX 3 Skywagon Cessna 182 XX XX XX XX 3 Skylane Cessna 185 XX XX XX XX 4 Skywagon Cessna 205/206 XX XX XX XX 5 Stationair Cessna 207 Skywagon/ XX XX XX 6 Stationair Cessna/Texron XX XX XX 7 - 10 208 Caravan Cessna 210 X X x 5 Centurion Fixed-Wing Aircraft - SMALL—cont’d.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Avionics Design and Modification
    List of Avionics Design and Modification - Aerovation’s Past Performance 15-Oct-2017, Rev IR Aerovation, Inc. 7005 S. Plumer Ave Tucson, AZ 85756 - USA Tel. (520) 308-6409 Fax (520) 844-8785 www.AerovationInc.com This document may contain commercial or financial information, or trade secrets, of Aerovation, Inc., which are confidential and exempt from disclosure to the public under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4), and unlawful disclosure thereof is a violation of the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. 1905 Public disclosure of any such information or trade secrets shall not be made without the prior written permission of Aerovation, Inc List of Avionics Project Company Project Year Aircraft Basic Description AAC 707-18740 1990 Boeing 707 FLt Dir, FMS, Airdata, Satphone 727-23-20095 1989 Boeing 727 EFIS 727-76OXY 1989 Boeing 727 EFIS 727-22362 1994 Boeing 727 EFIS 727-SN18998 1999 Boeing 727 Nav/Comm, FMS 727-SN19394 1998 Boeing 727 Airdata system 727-SN22362 2000 Boeing 727 TCAS 737-UJL 1992 Boeing 737 DMEs, Transponders, INS, No. 1&2 HF ALATHER 1997 Boeing 727-100 EFIS AMC727 1995 Boeing 727 EFIS B727-100-EGPWS 2001 Boeing 727 EGPWS B727-200_SN21474 2003 Boeing 727 ELT, ECS, IFE B737-200 2001 Boeing 737 EFIS, FMS B757 2003 Boeing 757 EGPWS B757 2005 Boeing 757 EGPWS B767 2002 Boeing 767 Interior, Emer Lts, PA B757 1992 Boeing 757 IFE FORBES727 1993 Boeing 727 EFIS LIMITED 1997 Undisclosed Autopilot Interface NASA-P3BN426NA 1991 Lockheed-Martin P3-B EFIS SPECIALCB 1990 Boeing 707 EFIS SPECIALEFIS 1990 Boeing 727 EFIS (EDZ-805)
    [Show full text]
  • Présentation Powerpoint
    ® NATIONAL STOCK PLY SPEED RATING MAIN AIRCRAFT POSITION SIZE TECHNOLOGY PART NUMBER MAIN MARKET NUMBER RATING (MPH) ADAM AIRCRAFT A500 NLG 6.00-6 BIAS 070-317-1 8 160 General Aviation ALCM TRAILER, Gulfstream GROUND / 34X9.25-16 BIAS 033-841-0 2610-01-154-5405 18 210 General Aviation II/IIB/III/IV MLG ALON 415 / Ercoupe NLG / MLG 5.00-5 BIAS 070-308-0 4 120 General Aviation NLG / MLG / ALON F1A 6.00-6 BIAS 070-315-0 4 120 General Aviation TLG ALON F1A NLG / MLG 6.00-6 BIAS 072-315-0 4 120 General Aviation AMERICAN CHAMPION 17-30 NLG / MLG 6.00-6 BIAS 072-314-0 6 120 General Aviation A Viking AMERICAN CHAMPION 17-30 NLG / MLG 15X6.0-6 BIAS 072-449-0 6 120 General Aviation A Viking AMERICAN CHAMPION 7CBC MLG 7.00-6 BIAS 072-313-0 6 120 General Aviation AMERICAN CHAMPION MLG 8.00-6 BIAS 072-371-0 6 120 General Aviation 7GCBC / Citabria Explorer AMERICAN CHAMPION MLG 8.50-6 BIAS 076-325-0 6 120 General Aviation 8GCBC / Scout BEECHCRAFT 18, 50, 65, 70, 80, 88, King Air 90 - CESSNA 188, 208, 308, 406 - Gulfstream 500, 560, 680, MLG 8.50-10 BIAS 025-349-0 2620-01-552-8487 8 160 General Aviation 681, 685, 720 - Mitsubishi MU2 - Piaggio 149, 166, 136 - Rockwell Int'l 500, 560, 680, 520 BEECHCRAFT 1900D, IJT36, NLG / MLG 22X6.75-10 BIAS 026-524-0 10 190 General Aviation BEECHCRAFT King Air 200 BEECHCRAFT 33, 35, 36 MLG 7.00-6 BIAS 070-313-0 6 120 General Aviation BEECHCRAFT Baron 55,56, NLG / MLG 6.50-8 BIAS 025-338-0 2620-01-460-5147 8 160 General Aviation EMBRAER EMB110 BEECHCRAFT King Air 200, 55 MLG 18X5.5 BIAS 033-631-0 10 210 General Aviation
    [Show full text]
  • CRD) to Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) 03-2006
    Comment Response Document (CRD) to Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) 03-2006 for amending the Executive Director Decision No. 2005/07/R of 19 December 2005 on acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 20 November 2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks APPENDIX I AIRCRAFT TYPE RATINGS FOR PART-66 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE LICENCE CRD to NPA 03/2006 Explanatory Note I. General 1. The purpose of the Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) 03/2006, dated 20 April 2006 was to propose an amendment to Decision N° 2005/07/R of the Executive Director of the Agency of 19 December 2005 on acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 20 November 2003 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks (ED Decision 2005/07/R). II. Consultation 2. The draft Executive Director Decision (ED Decision) amending ED Decision 2005/07/R was published on the web site (www.easa.europa.eu) on 21 April 2006. By the closing date of 2 June 2006, European Aviation Safety Agency (the Agency) had received 107 comments from 20 National Aviation Authorities, professional organisations and private companies. III. Publication of the CRD 3. All comments received have been acknowledged and incorporated into a Comment Response Document (CRD). This CRD contains a list of all persons and/or organisations that have provided comments and the answers of the Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • THE INCOMPLETE GUIDE to AIRFOIL USAGE David Lednicer
    THE INCOMPLETE GUIDE TO AIRFOIL USAGE David Lednicer Analytical Methods, Inc. 2133 152nd Ave NE Redmond, WA 98052 [email protected] Conventional Aircraft: Wing Root Airfoil Wing Tip Airfoil 3Xtrim 3X47 Ultra TsAGI R-3 (15.5%) TsAGI R-3 (15.5%) 3Xtrim 3X55 Trener TsAGI R-3 (15.5%) TsAGI R-3 (15.5%) AA 65-2 Canario Clark Y Clark Y AAA Vision NACA 63A415 NACA 63A415 AAI AA-2 Mamba NACA 4412 NACA 4412 AAI RQ-2 Pioneer NACA 4415 NACA 4415 AAI Shadow 200 NACA 4415 NACA 4415 AAI Shadow 400 NACA 4415 ? NACA 4415 ? AAMSA Quail Commander Clark Y Clark Y AAMSA Sparrow Commander Clark Y Clark Y Abaris Golden Arrow NACA 65-215 NACA 65-215 ABC Robin RAF-34 RAF-34 Abe Midget V Goettingen 387 Goettingen 387 Abe Mizet II Goettingen 387 Goettingen 387 Abrams Explorer NACA 23018 NACA 23009 Ace Baby Ace Clark Y mod Clark Y mod Ackland Legend Viken GTO Viken GTO Adam Aircraft A500 NASA LS(1)-0417 NASA LS(1)-0417 Adam Aircraft A700 NASA LS(1)-0417 NASA LS(1)-0417 Addyman S.T.G. Goettingen 436 Goettingen 436 AER Pegaso M 100S NACA 63-618 NACA 63-615 mod AerItalia G222 (C-27) NACA 64A315.2 ? NACA 64A315.2 ? AerItalia/AerMacchi/Embraer AMX ? 12% ? 12% AerMacchi AM-3 NACA 23016 NACA 4412 AerMacchi MB.308 NACA 230?? NACA 230?? AerMacchi MB.314 NACA 230?? NACA 230?? AerMacchi MB.320 NACA 230?? NACA 230?? AerMacchi MB.326 NACA 64A114 NACA 64A212 AerMacchi MB.336 NACA 64A114 NACA 64A212 AerMacchi MB.339 NACA 64A114 NACA 64A212 AerMacchi MC.200 Saetta NACA 23018 NACA 23009 AerMacchi MC.201 NACA 23018 NACA 23009 AerMacchi MC.202 Folgore NACA 23018 NACA 23009 AerMacchi
    [Show full text]