DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Minimum Flows for the Lower Peace River and Lower Shell Creek, Draft Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Minimum Flows for the Lower Peace River and Lower Shell Creek, Draft Report Proposed Minimum Flows for the Lower Peace River and Lower Shell Creek, Draft Report March 20, 2020 DRAFT Proposed Minimum Flows for the Lower Peace River and Lower Shell Creek, Draft Report March 20, 2020 Yonas Ghile, PhD, PH, Lead Hydrologist XinJian Chen, PhD, PE, Chief Professional Engineer Douglas A. Leeper, MFLs Program Lead Chris Anastasiou, PhD, Chief Water Quality Scientist Kristina Deak, Staff Environmental Scientist Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 The Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) does not discriminate on the basis of disability. This nondiscrimination policy involves every aspect of the District’s functions, including access to and participation in the District’s programs, services and activities. Anyone requiring reasonable accommodation, or would like information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities, as provided for in the Americans with Disabilities Act, should contact Donna Kaspari, Sr. Performance Management Professional, at 2379 Broad St., Brooksville, FL 34604-6899; telephone (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only), ext. 4706; or email [email protected]. If you are hearing or speech impaired, please contact the agency using the Florida Relay Service, 1-800-955-8771 (TDD) or 1-800-955-8770 (Voice). If requested, appropriate auxiliary aids and services will be provided at any public meeting, forum, or event of the District. In the event of a complaint, please follow the grievance procedure located at WaterMatters.org/ADA. i DRAFT Acknowledgments The authors thank Ron Basso, Mike Bray, Eric DeHaven, Gabe Herrick, Kym Holzwart, Jeanette Lopez, Jordan Miller, Jim Owens, Danielle Rogers, Jennette Seachrist, Randy Smith, Chris Tumminia, Adrienne Vining, Lei Yang and Chris Zajac with the Southwest Florida Water Management District for their contributions and useful suggestions concerning the work summarized in this report. The authors also acknowledge and thank several additional individuals and organizations that contributed to this report, including: HSW Engineering, Inc. for conducting floodplain inundation analysis; Ralph Montgomery for his assistance in providing hydro-biological data and HBMP reports and analyzing the relationships of freshwater inflow with chlorophyll levels; Ping Wang of the University of South Florida for bathymetric data collection; Jan Kool of HydroGeoLogic, Inc. for providing Peace River Integrated Modeling project outputs; Aerial Cartographic of America, Inc., for producing improved LiDAR data; Peter Rubec formerly with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission for developing fish habitat suitability information; Janicki Environmental, Inc., for conducting water quality analysis; Lianyuan Zheng for providing boundary conditions data; and staff from the Peace River Manasota Water Supply Authority, the Charlotte Harbor Estuary Program, and the City of Punta Gorda. ii DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ vii CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 1.1. Reevaluation of 2010 Lower Peace River Minimum Flows and Development of Proposed Minimum Flows for the Lower Peace River and Lower Shell Creek ............ 1 1.2. Legal Directives for Establishment of Minimum Flows and Levels ..................... 4 1.2.1. Relevant Florida’s Statues and Rules .......................................................... 4 1.2.2. Environmental Values .................................................................................. 6 1.3. Development of Minimum Flows and Levels ...................................................... 6 1.3.1. Flow Definitions and Concepts .................................................................... 7 1.3.2. Baseline Flow Conditions ............................................................................ 8 1.3.3. Building Block Approach .............................................................................. 9 1.3.4. Low Flow Threshold .................................................................................. 10 1.3.5. Significant Harm and 15 Percent Change Criteria ..................................... 10 1.3.6. Percent-of-flow Method.............................................................................. 11 1.3.7. Adaptive Management ............................................................................... 12 1.4. Vertical Datums ................................................................................................ 13 1.5. Updates Made in Reevaluation of the Minimum Flows .................................... 14 CHAPTER 2 - PHYSICAL AND HYDROLGIC DESCRIPTION OF THE LOWER PEACE RIVER AND LOWER SHELL CREEK ........................................................................... 16 2.1. Peace River and Shell Creek Watersheds ....................................................... 16 2.2. Land Use and Land Cover ............................................................................... 20 2.3. Soils ................................................................................................................. 21 2.4. Bathymetry and Morphometry .......................................................................... 22 2.5. Climate ............................................................................................................. 26 2.6. Tides ................................................................................................................ 28 2.7. Streamflow ....................................................................................................... 29 2.7.1. Mean Annual Flows ................................................................................... 30 2.7.2. Seasonal Flows ......................................................................................... 34 2.8. Hydrogeology and Aquifer Levels .................................................................... 35 2.9. Water Use ........................................................................................................ 37 iii DRAFT CHAPTER 3 - WATER QUALITY CHRACTERSTICS .................................................. 41 3.1. Water Quality Classification ............................................................................. 41 3.3.1. Water Quality Characteristics in the Lower Peace River ............................... 44 3.3.1.1. Salinity .................................................................................................... 46 3.3.1.2. Dissolved Oxygen .................................................................................. 47 3.3.1.3. Chlorophyll ............................................................................................. 49 3.3.1.4. Nitrate+nitrite and Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen .............................................. 51 3.3.1.5. Ortho-phosphorus .................................................................................. 53 3.3.1.6. Water Color ............................................................................................ 55 3.3.2. Relationships between Lower Peace River Flow and Water Quality Constituents ............................................................................................................... 56 3.3.2.1. Relationships between Flow and Salinity ............................................... 56 3.3.2.2. Relationships between Flow and Chlorophyll ......................................... 57 3.3.2.3. Relationships between Flow and Dissolved Oxygen .............................. 58 3.3.2.4. Relationships between Flow and Nutrients ............................................ 59 3.3.2.5. Relationships between Flow and Water Color ........................................ 61 3.3.3. Water Quality Characteristics in Lower Shell Creek...................................... 62 3.3.3.1. Salinity .................................................................................................... 63 3.3.3.2. Dissolved Oxygen .................................................................................. 64 3.3.3.3. Chlorophyll ............................................................................................. 66 3.3.3.4. Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen and Ortho-phosphorus ...................................... 67 3.3.4. Relationships between Shell Creek Flow and Water Quality Constituents ... 70 CHAPTER 4 – ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES ............................................................... 71 4.1. Vegetation ........................................................................................................ 71 4.1.1. Shoreline Vegetation ................................................................................. 71 4.1.2. Bottomland Hardwood and Mixed Wetland Forests ................................... 71 4.1.3. Tidal Marshes and Saltmarshes ................................................................ 72 4.1.4. Mangroves ................................................................................................. 73 4.1.5. Seagrasses ................................................................................................ 73 4.2. Fish and Benthic Macroinvertebrates ............................................................... 75 4.2.1. Fish and Planktonic/Nektonic Invertebrates ............................................... 76 iv DRAFT 4.2.2. Macroinvertebrates
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effects of River Discharge and High-Tide Stage on Salinity Intrusion in the Weeki Wachee, Crystal, and Withlacoochee River Estuaries, Southwest Florida
    EFFECTS OF RIVER DISCHARGE AND HIGH-TIDE STAGE ON SALINITY INTRUSION IN THE WEEKI WACHEE, CRYSTAL, AND WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER ESTUARIES, SOUTHWEST FLORIDA By Dann K. Yobbi and Lari A. Knochenmus U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 88-4116 Prepared in cooperation with the SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Tallahassee, Florida 1989 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Suite 3015 Federal Center, Building 810 227 North Bronough Street Box 25425 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract ---.--.-.--.-...-..........-.-.-.....-.....---- 1 Introduction ............................................. 1 Purpose and scope .--..-...-.....-....-..-..-........--. 2 Acknowledgments ...................................... 2 Physical environment -..-..........-........-.-.-..-.-.-.- 2 Methods of study -.--..----............-.-..-..-....-...--- 9 Data collection --.--.--...-.........--....-.....-.-.--- 9 Data analysis -.--..--.-................---..........-- 14 Physical and salinity characteristics ...--.--.......-....-..........-- 15 Weeki Wachee River ..................................... 15 Crystal River ......................................... 24 Withlacoochee River ------------------------------------- 29 Effects of river discharge and high-tide stage on
    [Show full text]
  • SEBASTIAN RIVER SALINITY REGIME Report of a Study
    Special Publication SJ94-SP1 SEBASTIAN RIVER SALINITY REGIME Report of a Study Part I. Review of Goals, Policies, and Objectives Part II: Segmentation Parts III and IV: Recommended Targets (Contract 92W-177) Submitted to the: St. Johns River Water Management District by the: Mote Marine Laboratory 1600 Thompson Parkway Sarasota, Florida 34236 Ernest D. Estevez, Ph.D. and Michael J. Marshall, Ph.D. Principal Investigators EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the third and final report of a project concerning desirable salinity conditions in the Sebastian River and adjacent Indian River Lagoon. A perception exists among resource managers that the present salinity regime of the Sebastian River system is undesirable. The St. Johns River Water Management District desires to learn the nature of an "environmentally desirable and acceptable salinity regime" for the Sebastian River and adjacent waters of the Indian River Lagoon. The District can then calculate discharges needed to produce the desired salinity regime, or conclude that optimal discharges are beyond its control. The values of studying salinity and making it a management priority in estuaries are four-fold. First, salinity has intrinsic significance as an important regulatory factor. Second, changes in the salinity regime of an estuary tend to be relatively easy to handle from a computational and practical point of view. Third, eliminating salinity as a problem clears the way for studies of, and corrective actions for, more insidious factors. Fourth, the strong covariance of salinity and other factors that tend to be management problems in estuaries makes salinity a useful tool in their analysis. Freshwater inflow and salinity are integral aspects of estuaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Minimum Flows for the Lower Peace River and Proposed Minimum Flows Lower Shell Creek, Draft Report
    Recommended Minimum Flows for the Lower Peace River and Proposed Minimum Flows Lower Shell Creek, Draft Report November 30, 2020 Recommended Minimum Flows for the Lower Peace River and Proposed Minimum Flows for Lower Shell Creek, Draft Report November 30, 2020 Yonas Ghile, PhD, PH, Lead Hydrologist XinJian Chen, PhD, PE, Chief Professional Engineer Douglas A. Leeper, MFLs Program Lead Chris Anastasiou, PhD, Chief Water Quality Scientist Kristina Deak, PhD, Staff Environmental Scientist Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 The Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) does not discriminate on the basis of disability. This nondiscrimination policy involves every aspect of the District’s functions, including access to and participation in the District’s programs, services, and activities. Anyone requiring reasonable accommodation, or who would like information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities, as provided for in the Americans with Disabilities Act, should contact Donna Eisenbeis, Sr. Performance Management Professional, at 2379 Broad St., Brooksville, FL 34604-6899; telephone (352) 796-7211 or 1-800- 423-1476 (FL only), ext. 4706; or email [email protected]. If you are hearing or speech impaired, please contact the agency using the Florida Relay Service, 1-800-955-8771 (TDD) or 1-800-955-8770 (Voice). If requested, appropriate auxiliary aids and services will be provided at any public meeting, forum, or event of the District. In the event of a complaint, please follow the grievance procedure located at WaterMatters.org/ADA. i Table of Contents Acronym List Table......................................................................................................... vii Conversion Unit Table ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kings Bay/Crystal River Springs Restoration Plan
    Kings Bay/Crystal River Springs Restoration Plan Kings Bay/Crystal River Springs Restoration Plan Kings Bay/Crystal River Springs Restoration Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................. 1 Section 1.0 Regional Perspective ............................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Why Springs are Important ...................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Springs Coast Springs Focus Area ........................................................................................... 2 1.4 Description of the Springs Coast Area .................................................................................... 3 1.5 Climate ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Physiographic Regions .............................................................................................................. 5 1.7 Karst ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.8 Hydrogeologic Framework ...................................................................................................... 7 1.9 Descriptions of Selected Spring Groups ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters
    Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2006 - 2007 Executive Summary This report was prepared in accordance with §369.22 (7), Florida Statutes, to provide an annual assessment of the control achieved and funding necessary to manage nonindigenous aquatic plants in intercounty waters. The authority of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) as addressed in §369.20 (5), Florida Statutes, extends to the management of nuisance populations of all aquatic plants, both indigenous and nonindigenous, and in all waters accessible to the general public. The aquatic plant management program in Florida’s public waters involves complex operational and financial interactions between state, federal and local governments as well as private sector compa- nies. A summary of plant acres controlled in sovereignty public waters and associated expenditures contracted or monitored by the DEP during Fiscal Year 2006-2007 is presented in the tables on page 42 of this report. Florida’s aquatic plant management program mission is to reduce negative impacts from invasive nonindigenous plants like water hyacinth, water lettuce and hydrilla to conserve the multiple uses and functions of public lakes and rivers. Invasive plants infest 95 percent of the 437 public waters inventoried in 2007 that comprise 1.25 million acres of fresh water where fishing alone is valued at more than $1.5 billion annually. Once established, eradicating invasive plants is difficult or impossible and very expensive; therefore, continuous maintenance is critical to sustaining navigation, flood control and recreation while conserving native plant habitat on sovereignty state lands at the lowest feasible cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Minimum Flows for the Chassahowitzka River System
    Recommended Minimum Flows For the Chassahowitzka River System Photo: W. Sotera October 30, 2012 Michael G. Heyl, Doug Leeper, Ron Basso Southwest Florida Water Management District Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 and Marty Kelly (Formerly with Southwest Florida Water Management District) With contributions by Balanced Environmental Management Systems, Inc. ChassMFL_Final.docx Last Save: 12/11/2012 9:18 AM ii ChassMFL_Final.docx Last Save: 12/11/2012 9:18 AM Recommended Minimum Flows for the Chassahowitzka River System October 30, 2012 Michael G. Heyl, Doug Leeper, Ron Basso Southwest Florida Water Management District Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 and Marty Kelly (Formerly with Southwest Florida Water Management District) With contributions by Balanced Environmental Management Systems, Inc. Prime Contractor The Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) does not discriminate on the basis of disability. This nondiscrimination policy involves every aspect of the District's functions, including access to and participation in the District's programs and activities. Anyone requiring reasonable accommodation as provided for in the Americans with Disabilities Act should contact the District's Human Resources Bureau Chief, 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899; telephone (352) 796-7211, ext. 4702 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only), ext. 4702; TDD (FL only) 1-800-231-6103; or email to [email protected]. iii ChassMFL_Final.docx Last Save: 12/11/2012 9:18 AM Acknowledgements We would like to thank several of our colleagues at the Southwest Florida Water Management District for their contributions and useful suggestions concerning the work summarized in this report We are also indebted to District staff who conducted field sampling for the project (Don Hampton, Courtney James, Tammy Hinkle, Jason Hood and Richard Gant) and to Barbara Matrone for her assistance in document production.
    [Show full text]
  • Reevaluation of Minimum Flows for the Chassahowitzka River System Final Draft
    Reevaluation of Minimum Flows for the Chassahowitzka River System Final Draft October 2019 Reevaluation of Minimum Flows for the Chassahowitzka River System Final Draft October 2019 Southwest Florida Water Management District Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 Gabe Herrick, XinJian Chen, Chris Anastasiou, Ron Basso, Natasha Mendez-Ferrer, Nicole Ortega, Danielle Rogers, and Doug Leeper The Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) does not discriminate on the basis of disability. This nondiscrimination policy involves every aspect of the District’s functions, including access to and participation in the District’s programs and activities. Anyone requiring reasonable accommodation as provided for in the Americans with Disabilities Act should contact the District’s Human Resources Office Chief, 2379 Broad St., Brooksville, FL 34604- 6899; telephone (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only), ext. 4703; or email [email protected]. If you are hearing or speech impaired, please contact the agency using the Florida Relay Service, 1(800) 955-8771 (TDD) or 1(800) 955-8770 (Voice). Page i Reevaluation of Minimum Flows for the Chassahowitzka River System October 2019 The geological evaluation and interpretation contained in the report entitled Reevaluation of Minimum Flows for the Chassahowitzka River System has been prepared by or approved by a Certified Professional Geologist in the State of Florida, in accordance with Chapter 492, Florida Statutes. Ronald J. Basso, Jr. Professional Geologist License No. PG 0001325 Page
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to Eating Fish Caught in Florida
    Fish Consumption Advisories are published periodically by the Your Guide State of Florida to alert consumers about the possibility of chemically contaminated fish in Florida waters. To Eating The advisories are meant to inform the public of potential health risks of specific fish species from specific Fish Caught water bodies. In Florida Florida Department of Health Prepared in cooperation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 2016 Florida Fish Advisories • Table 1: Eating Guidelines for Fresh Water Fish from Florida Waters page 1-33 • Table 2: Eating Guidelines for Marine and Estuarine Fish from Florida Waters page 34-35 • Table 3: Eating Guidelines for species from Florida Waters with Heavy Metals, Dioxin, Pesticides, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), or Saxitoxin Contamination page 36 Eating Fish is an important part of a healthy diet. Rich in vitamins and low in fat, fish contains protein we need for strong bodies. It is also an excellent source of nutrition for proper growth and development. In fact, the American Heart Association recommends that you eat two meals of fish or seafood every week. At the same time, most Florida seafood has low to medium levels of mercury. Depending on the age of the fish, the type of fish, and the condition of the water the fish lives in, the levels of mercury found in fish are different. While mercury in rivers, creeks, ponds, and lakes can build up in some fish to levels that can be harmful, most fish caught in Florida can be eaten without harm.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Archaeological Survey of Weeki Wachee Springs State Park, Hernando County, Florida
    PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF WEEKI WACHEE SPRINGS STATE PARK, HERNANDO COUNTY, FLORIDA Jason M. O’Donoughue and Kenneth E. Sassaman Technical Report 18 Laboratory of Southeastern Archaeology Department of Anthropology University of Florida PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF WEEKI WACHEE SPRINGS STATE PARK, HERNANDO COUNTY, FLORIDA Jason M. O’Donoughue Kenneth E. Sassaman Technical Report 18 Laboratory of Southeastern Archaeology Department of Anthropology University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611 Florida DEP Order No. A75928 December 2013 © 2013 Department of Anthropology, University of Florida all rights reserved Cover photo of subsurface testing near the Underwater Mermaid Theater at Weeki Wachee Springs State Park, Hernando County, Florida, March 2013. ii MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The Laboratory of Southeastern Archaeology (LSA) of the Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, conducted a Phase I archaeological survey at Weeki Wachee Springs State Park in March and May 2013 to aid the Florida Division of Recreation and Parks (DRP), Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) as they plan infrastructure rehabilitation and redevelopment in the park. This survey was conducted to identify subsurface cultural resources that could be impacted by redevelopment activities and to evaluate their eligibility for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). An additional goal was to document the depth and extent of recent subsurface disturbance in the APE. This research was conducted under Florida DEP Order #A75928 and 1A-32 permit #1213.023. The survey was performed in accordance with Chapter 267 Florida Statutes and all work including background research, field work, artifact analysis and curation, and preparation of this report conformed to Chapter 1A-46, Florida Administrative Code and the Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operation Manual (FDHR 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • FAC 62-302.532 Estuary-Specific Numeric Interpretations of The
    62-302.532 Estuary-Specific Numeric Interpretations of the Narrative Nutrient Criterion. (1) Estuary-specific numeric interpretations of the narrative nutrient criterion in paragraph 62-302.530(47)(b), F.A.C., are in the table below. The concentration-based estuary interpretations are open water, area-wide averages. Numeric values listed below for nutrient and nutrient response values do not apply to wetlands or to tidal tributaries that fluctuate between predominantly marine and predominantly fresh waters during typical climatic and hydrologic conditions unless specifically provided by name below. The interpretations expressed as load per million cubic meters of freshwater inflow are the total load of that nutrient to the estuary divided by the total volume of freshwater inflow to that estuary. The numeric values listed below will be superseded if, pursuant to subsection 62-302.531(2), F.A.C., a more recent numeric interpretation of the narrative nutrient criterion in paragraph 62- 302.530(47)(b), F.A.C., such as a Level II Water Quality Based Effluent Limitation (WQBEL), Site Specific Alternative Criterion (SSAC), Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL), or Reasonable Assurance Demonstration, is established by the Department. Estuary Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen Chlorophyll a (a) Clearwater Harbor/St. Criteria expressed as annual geometric mean (AGM) values are not to be exceeded more than once in a Joseph Sound three year period. Nutrient and nutrient response values do not apply to tidally influenced areas that fluctuate between predominantly marine and predominantly fresh waters during typical climatic and hydrologic conditions. 1. St. Joseph Sound 0.05 mg/L as AGM 0.66 mg/L as AGM 3.1 µg/L as AGM 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge
    Chassahowitzka National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region September 2012 COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN CHASSAHOWITZKA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Citrus and Hernando Counties, Florida U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia September 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 I. Background ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 Purpose and Need for the Plan .................................................................................................... 5 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ...................................................................................................... 9 National Wildlife Refuge System .................................................................................................. 9 Legal and Policy Context ............................................................................................................ 10 Legal Mandates and Administrative and Policy Guidelines .............................................. 10 Biological Integrity, Diversity, and Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Volume I. Report FINAL
    DATA INVENTORY, TREND ANALYSIS, RECOMMENDED MONITORING: FLORIDA SPRINGS COAST Volume I. Report FINAL Submitted to: Scott E. Stevens, P.E., Project Manager Southwest Florida Water Management District Surface Water Improvement and Management Section of the Resource Projects Department 7601 U.S. 301 North Tampa, FL 33637 Submitted by: Mote Marine Laboratory 1600 Ken Thompson Parkway Sarasota, Florida 34236 (941) 388-4441 L. Kellie Dixon Principal Investigator December 5, 1997 Mote Marine Laboratory Technical Report Number 547 This document is printed on recycled paper. Suggested reference Dixon LK. 1997. Data inventory, trend analysis, and recommended monitoring: Florida Springs coast. Southwest Florida Water Management District. Mote Marine Laboratory Technical Report no 547. 66 p. and appendices. Available from: Mote Marine Laboratory Library. TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I. REPORT Page Table of Contents . i List of Figures . iii List of Tables . iv Acknowledgements . v I. Executive Summary ......................................... I-1 II. Introduction .............................................. I-2 III. Project Summary and Goals .................................... I-2 IV. Geographic Scope and Regional Description .......................... I-3 V. Conceptual Model .......................................... I-3 VI. Data Inventory ............................................ I-9 VII. Data Summaries .......................................... I-11 VIII. Selection of Data Sets and Minimum Criteria ........................ I-13 Data Selection
    [Show full text]