DOCSLIB.ORG

Reevaluation of Minimum Flows for the Chassahowitzka River System Final Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reevaluation of Minimum Flows for the Chassahowitzka River System Final Draft Reevaluation of Minimum Flows for the Chassahowitzka River System Final Draft October 2019 Reevaluation of Minimum Flows for the Chassahowitzka River System Final Draft October 2019 Southwest Florida Water Management District Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 Gabe Herrick, XinJian Chen, Chris Anastasiou, Ron Basso, Natasha Mendez-Ferrer, Nicole Ortega, Danielle Rogers, and Doug Leeper The Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) does not discriminate on the basis of disability. This nondiscrimination policy involves every aspect of the District’s functions, including access to and participation in the District’s programs and activities. Anyone requiring reasonable accommodation as provided for in the Americans with Disabilities Act should contact the District’s Human Resources Office Chief, 2379 Broad St., Brooksville, FL 34604- 6899; telephone (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only), ext. 4703; or email [email protected]. If you are hearing or speech impaired, please contact the agency using the Florida Relay Service, 1(800) 955-8771 (TDD) or 1(800) 955-8770 (Voice). Page i Reevaluation of Minimum Flows for the Chassahowitzka River System October 2019 The geological evaluation and interpretation contained in the report entitled Reevaluation of Minimum Flows for the Chassahowitzka River System has been prepared by or approved by a Certified Professional Geologist in the State of Florida, in accordance with Chapter 492, Florida Statutes. Ronald J. Basso, Jr. Professional Geologist License No. PG 0001325 Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ VIII CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 2013 MINIMUM FLOWS EVALUATION AND RULE .................................................................... 1 1.2 LEGAL DIRECTIVES AND USE OF MINIMUM FLOWS AND LEVELS ............................................. 2 1.2.1 Relevant Statues and Rules ...................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Environmental Values ................................................................................................ 3 1.3 VERTICAL DATUM ............................................................................................................... 4 1.4 DEVELOPMENT OF MINIMUM FLOWS AND LEVELS IN THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ........................................................................................................... 4 1.4.1 Significant Harm ........................................................................................................ 5 1.4.2 Flow Definitions ......................................................................................................... 8 1.4.3 Adaptive Management ............................................................................................... 9 1.5 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE ORIGINAL MINIMUM FLOW EVALUATION AND THIS 2019 REEVALUATION ........................................................................................................................ 9 CHAPTER 2 - PHYSICAL SETTING AND DESCRIPTION OF THE CHASSAHOWITZKA RIVER SYSTEM ...................................................................................................................................13 2.1 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF RIVER SEGMENTS AND SPRINGS .......................................17 2.2 WATERSHED LAND USE AND COVER ..................................................................................20 2.3 GAGE DATA ......................................................................................................................21 2.3.1 Chassahowitzka River near Homosassa, FL (Gage No. 02310650) .........................24 2.3.2 Chassahowitzka River near Chassahowitzka, FL (gage No. 02310663) ...................31 2.3.3 Chassahowitzka River at Dog Island near Chassahowitzka, FL (gage No. 02310673) ..........................................................................................................................................37 2.3.4 Chassahowitzka River at Mouth near Chassahowitzka, FL (gage No. 02310674) ....43 2.4 BOTTOM SUBSTRATES .......................................................................................................47 2.5 FLOW RECORDS ...............................................................................................................47 Page iii 2.5.1 Differences in Flow Records .....................................................................................47 2.5.2 The General Flow Record .........................................................................................48 CHAPTER 3 - WATER QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH FLOW . 50 3.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................50 3.1.1 Water Quality Classification ......................................................................................50 3.1.2 Impaired Waters Rule ...............................................................................................51 3.1.3 Numeric Nutrient Criteria ..........................................................................................53 3.1.4 Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) ........................................................................54 3.1.5 Water Clarity .............................................................................................................55 3.2 OVERVIEW OF WATER QUALITY DATA SOURCES .................................................................55 3.2.1 Active Water Quality Data Collection ........................................................................55 3.2.2 Inactive Water Quality Data Collection ......................................................................62 3.3 SPATIAL VARIATIONS IN WATER QUALITY CONSTITUENTS ....................................................64 3.3.1 Total Nitrogen ...........................................................................................................64 3.3.2 Nitrate + Nitrite .........................................................................................................66 3.3.3 Total Phosphorous ...................................................................................................68 3.3.4 Soluble Reactive Phosphorous and Orthophosphate ................................................71 3.3.5 Chlorophyll ...............................................................................................................74 3.3.6 Water Clarity .............................................................................................................77 3.4 TEMPORAL VARIATION IN WATER QUALITY CONSTITUENTS ..................................................80 3.4.1 Total Nitrogen ...........................................................................................................80 3.4.2 Nitrate + Nitrite .........................................................................................................83 3.4.3 Total Phosphorous ...................................................................................................85 3.4.4 Soluble Reactive Phosphorous and Orthophosphate ................................................86 3.4.5 Chlorophyll ...............................................................................................................88 3.4.6 Water Clarity .............................................................................................................90 Page iv 3.5 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FLOW AND WATER QUALITY CONSTITUENTS ..................................91 3.5.1 Flow Record for Water Quality Analysis ....................................................................91 3.5.2 Spring Vents .............................................................................................................92 3.5.3 River Mainstem ........................................................................................................95 3.5.4 Estuary .....................................................................................................................99 CHAPTER 4 - BIOLOGICAL STATUS AND TRENDS FOR THE CHASSAHOWITZKA RIVER SYSTEM ................................................................................................................................. 101 4.1 VEGETATION ...................................................................................................................101 4.1.1 Land Cover .............................................................................................................101 4.1.2 Shoreline vegetation surveys ..................................................................................101 4.1.3 Submerged Aquatic Vegetation ..............................................................................109 4.1.4 Effects of Salinity and Sea Level on Vegetation ......................................................119 4.1.5 Vegetation Summary ..............................................................................................120 4.2 BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES .....................................................................................120 4.2.1 Oysters ...................................................................................................................120
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effects of River Discharge and High-Tide Stage on Salinity Intrusion in the Weeki Wachee, Crystal, and Withlacoochee River Estuaries, Southwest Florida
    EFFECTS OF RIVER DISCHARGE AND HIGH-TIDE STAGE ON SALINITY INTRUSION IN THE WEEKI WACHEE, CRYSTAL, AND WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER ESTUARIES, SOUTHWEST FLORIDA By Dann K. Yobbi and Lari A. Knochenmus U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 88-4116 Prepared in cooperation with the SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Tallahassee, Florida 1989 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Suite 3015 Federal Center, Building 810 227 North Bronough Street Box 25425 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract ---.--.-.--.-...-..........-.-.-.....-.....---- 1 Introduction ............................................. 1 Purpose and scope .--..-...-.....-....-..-..-........--. 2 Acknowledgments ...................................... 2 Physical environment -..-..........-........-.-.-..-.-.-.- 2 Methods of study -.--..----............-.-..-..-....-...--- 9 Data collection --.--.--...-.........--....-.....-.-.--- 9 Data analysis -.--..--.-................---..........-- 14 Physical and salinity characteristics ...--.--.......-....-..........-- 15 Weeki Wachee River ..................................... 15 Crystal River ......................................... 24 Withlacoochee River ------------------------------------- 29 Effects of river discharge and high-tide stage on
    [Show full text]
  • Experience Ocean, Lakes Abd Everglades in the Palm Beaches
    YEAR 2017 Experience Ocean, Lakes and Everglades in The Palm Beaches, Florida Discover the best way to experience Florida’s great outdoors, unique wildlife and natural beauty in The Palm Beaches. Situated between 47 miles of Atlantic Ocean and the shores of Lake Okeechobee, the largest lake in the southeastern United States, The Palm Beaches is the gateway to the Everglades and home to treasured animal sanctuaries, untouched nature preserves and a diverse range of soft adventure activities. TAKE A HIKE (OR PICTURE) Beauty is just a short hike away. The terrain is mostly flat, but tropical trees and plants abound with exotic wonder. Trek alongside wetlands in the Everglades or through wide-open wet prairie, no matter the trail, hikers will find sunshine serenity. DuPuis Management Area – Canal Point, FL The DuPuis Management Area is a 21,875-acre multi-use natural area located in the northwestern part of The Palm Beaches. The park land is interspersed with numerous ponds, wet prairies, cypress domes, pine flatwoods and remnant Everglades marsh. The area provides miles of hiking and horseback trails, an equestrian center, graded vehicle roads, backpack and group campsites as well as seasonal hunting. DuPuis is far from urban areas, and its dark night sky lends itself to excellent stargazing. Harold A. Campbell Public Use Area This site covers 17,000 acres on the southern border of The Palm Beaches, making it the largest constructed wetland in the world. Its public use area provides access to vast wetland habitat where bicyclists, hikers and birdwatchers can see a variety of wildlife native to Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • SEBASTIAN RIVER SALINITY REGIME Report of a Study
    Special Publication SJ94-SP1 SEBASTIAN RIVER SALINITY REGIME Report of a Study Part I. Review of Goals, Policies, and Objectives Part II: Segmentation Parts III and IV: Recommended Targets (Contract 92W-177) Submitted to the: St. Johns River Water Management District by the: Mote Marine Laboratory 1600 Thompson Parkway Sarasota, Florida 34236 Ernest D. Estevez, Ph.D. and Michael J. Marshall, Ph.D. Principal Investigators EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the third and final report of a project concerning desirable salinity conditions in the Sebastian River and adjacent Indian River Lagoon. A perception exists among resource managers that the present salinity regime of the Sebastian River system is undesirable. The St. Johns River Water Management District desires to learn the nature of an "environmentally desirable and acceptable salinity regime" for the Sebastian River and adjacent waters of the Indian River Lagoon. The District can then calculate discharges needed to produce the desired salinity regime, or conclude that optimal discharges are beyond its control. The values of studying salinity and making it a management priority in estuaries are four-fold. First, salinity has intrinsic significance as an important regulatory factor. Second, changes in the salinity regime of an estuary tend to be relatively easy to handle from a computational and practical point of view. Third, eliminating salinity as a problem clears the way for studies of, and corrective actions for, more insidious factors. Fourth, the strong covariance of salinity and other factors that tend to be management problems in estuaries makes salinity a useful tool in their analysis. Freshwater inflow and salinity are integral aspects of estuaries.
    [Show full text]
  • North Fork of the St. Lucie River Floodplain Vegetation Technical Report
    NORTH FORK ST. LUCIE RIVER FLOODPLAIN VEGETATION TECHNICAL REPORT WR-2015-005 Coastal Ecosystem Section Applied Sciences Bureau Water Resources Division South Florida Water Management District Final Report July 2015 i Resources Division North Fork of the St. Lucie River Floodplain Vegetation Technical Report ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document is the result of a cooperative effort between the Coastal Ecosystems Section of South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Florida Park Service (FPS) at the Savannas Preserve State Park in Jensen Beach, Florida and the Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserve Office in Fort Pierce, Florida. The principle author of this document was as follows: Marion Hedgepeth SFWMD The following staff contributed to the completion of this report: Cecilia Conrad SFWMD (retired) Jason Godin SFWMD Detong Sun SFWMD Yongshan Wan SFWMD We would like to acknowledge the contributions of Christine Lockhart of Habitat Specialist Inc. with regards to the pre-vegetation plant survey, reference collection established for this project, and for her assistance with plant identifications. We are especially grateful to Christopher Vandello of the Savannas Preserve State Park and Laura Herren and Brian Sharpe of the FDEP Indian River Lagoon Aquatic Preserves Office for their assistance in establishing the vegetation transects and conducting the field studies. And, we would like to recognize other field assistance from Mayra Ashton, Barbara Welch, and Caroline Hanes of SFWMD. Also, we would like to thank Kin Chuirazzi for performing a technical review of the document. ii North Fork of the St. Lucie River Floodplain Vegetation Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..........................................................................................................................ii List of Tables ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in the Lower St. Johns River and the Associated Physics
    University of North Florida UNF Digital Commons UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2016 The Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in the Lower St. Johns River and the Associated Physics Teddy Mulamba University of North Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd Part of the Civil Engineering Commons, and the Other Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Suggested Citation Mulamba, Teddy, "The Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in the Lower St. Johns River and the Associated Physics" (2016). UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 714. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/714 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © 2016 All Rights Reserved THE INFLUENCE OF SEA-LEVEL RISE ON SALINITY IN THE LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER AND THE ASSOCIATED PHYSICS by Teddy Mulamba A Thesis submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA COLLEGE OF COMPUTING, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION December, 2016 Unpublished work c Teddy Mulamba The Thesis titled "Influence of Sea-Level Rise on Salinity in The Lower St Johns River and The Associated Physics" is approved: ___________________________ _______________________ Dr. Don T. Resio, PhD ______________________________ _______________________ Dr. Peter Bacopoulos, PhD __________________________ _______________________ Dr. William Dally, PhD, PE Accepted for the School of Engineering: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seminole Battles of the Loxahatchee River
    The Seminole Battles of the Loxahatchee River. General Jesup's second campaign culminated in the two Battles of the Loxahatchee, January 15 and 24, 1838. In the first, Lieutenant Levin M. Powell (U.S. Navy), with a mixed contingent of sailors and soldiers, paddled up the southwest fork of the Loxahatchee River, where they disembarked and marched inland. In what became known as Powell's Battle, they stumbled upon and engaged a large force of Seminole, the same warriors who had fought Zachary Taylor three weeks earlier at Okeechobee. The Seminole were experienced guerrilla fighters and soon the casualties mounted for Powell's sailors (many of whom were new recruits), who broke ranks and ran. When Powell was wounded and ordered a withdrawal, Lieutenant Joseph E. Johnston and his army regulars conducted a rear guard action. This allowed most of the men to get back to the boats, but not before several were slain, including the surgeon. Learning of Powell's defeat, Jesup ordered his army of 1,600 men forward in hopes of engaging the same Seminole force. At noon on January 24 some of Jesup's troops were met by Seminole scouts, who fired on the lead file of Dragoons. The Dragoons gave chase, and along with a large group of Tennessee Volunteers, entered a cypress swamp half a mile wide. The army pushed across the swamp into a dense hammock and up to the Loxahatchee River. Using the shallow river ford to cross, the Indians quickly regrouped and waited for the troops to follow. The volunteers followed them to the ford and took cover, but faced with heavy fire, would not attempt a crossing.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Minimum Flows for Wakulla and Sally Ward Springs Wakulla County, Florida DRAFT
    Recommended Minimum Flows for Wakulla and Sally Ward Springs Wakulla County, Florida DRAFT Northwest Florida Water Management District 80 Water Management Drive Havana, Florida 32333 (850) 539-5999 www.nwfwater.com November 2020 Program Development Series 21-XX NORTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD George Jerry Pate Roberts Chair, Panama Vice Chair, City Pensacola Kellie Ted Nick Gus Ralston Everett Patronis Andrews Tallahassee Chipley Panama Defuniak City Springs Brett J. Cyphers Executive Director DISTRICT OFFICES Havana (Headquarters) DeFuniak Springs Youngstown Milton For additional information, write or call: Northwest Florida Water Management District 81 Water Management Drive Havana, Florida 32333-4712 (850) 539-5999 www.nwfwater.com 2 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................. 6 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................... 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................................... 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 11 1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Minimum Flows for the Lower Peace River and Proposed Minimum Flows Lower Shell Creek, Draft Report
    Recommended Minimum Flows for the Lower Peace River and Proposed Minimum Flows Lower Shell Creek, Draft Report November 30, 2020 Recommended Minimum Flows for the Lower Peace River and Proposed Minimum Flows for Lower Shell Creek, Draft Report November 30, 2020 Yonas Ghile, PhD, PH, Lead Hydrologist XinJian Chen, PhD, PE, Chief Professional Engineer Douglas A. Leeper, MFLs Program Lead Chris Anastasiou, PhD, Chief Water Quality Scientist Kristina Deak, PhD, Staff Environmental Scientist Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 The Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) does not discriminate on the basis of disability. This nondiscrimination policy involves every aspect of the District’s functions, including access to and participation in the District’s programs, services, and activities. Anyone requiring reasonable accommodation, or who would like information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities, as provided for in the Americans with Disabilities Act, should contact Donna Eisenbeis, Sr. Performance Management Professional, at 2379 Broad St., Brooksville, FL 34604-6899; telephone (352) 796-7211 or 1-800- 423-1476 (FL only), ext. 4706; or email [email protected]. If you are hearing or speech impaired, please contact the agency using the Florida Relay Service, 1-800-955-8771 (TDD) or 1-800-955-8770 (Voice). If requested, appropriate auxiliary aids and services will be provided at any public meeting, forum, or event of the District. In the event of a complaint, please follow the grievance procedure located at WaterMatters.org/ADA. i Table of Contents Acronym List Table......................................................................................................... vii Conversion Unit Table ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Loxcover Flat.Eps
    LOXAHATCHEE RIVER National Wild and Scenic River Management Plan PLAN UPDATE JUNE, 2000 Florida Department of Environmental Protection South Florida Water Management District LOXAHATCHEE RIVER WILD AND SCENIC RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER II RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT 9 CHAPTER III PUBLIC USE AND CARRYING CAPACITY 47 CHAPTER IV MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY AND DIRECTION 69 CHAPTER V RIVER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 87 CHAPTER VI PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 109 CHAPTER VII PROGRESS TO DATE 119 AMENDMENTS TO OCTOBER, 1998 DRAFT LOXAHATCHEE RIVER WILD AND SCENIC RIVER MGMT. PLAN CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Rivers have always held a special importance and fascination for man. In the earliest days, interest in rivers centered on the more material things; a source of water, a means of transportation, a habitat of edible fish and fowl, and wastewater disposal. While these may still be important for modern man, rivers today have assumed yet another dimension in their ability to serve a wide variety of natural resource preservation and outdoor recreation needs. Whether for scientific research, education, boating, fishing, canoeing or simply marveling at the handiwork of nature, rivers and streams in all their diversity constitute one of the most valuable of natural resources. But rivers, like most things in nature, are susceptible to drastic change at the hands of humans. They may be bridged for highways, dammed for hydroelectricity, dredged for navigation and canalized for water control. Their banks may be cleared and their attendant marshes and swamps drained or filled for development. While much of this change, good and bad, may be inevitable as a side-effect of human growth and activity, it is unfortunately true that most of it diminishes the biological and recreational potential of affected rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Kings Bay/Crystal River Springs Restoration Plan
    Kings Bay/Crystal River Springs Restoration Plan Kings Bay/Crystal River Springs Restoration Plan Kings Bay/Crystal River Springs Restoration Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................. 1 Section 1.0 Regional Perspective ............................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Why Springs are Important ...................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Springs Coast Springs Focus Area ........................................................................................... 2 1.4 Description of the Springs Coast Area .................................................................................... 3 1.5 Climate ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Physiographic Regions .............................................................................................................. 5 1.7 Karst ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.8 Hydrogeologic Framework ...................................................................................................... 7 1.9 Descriptions of Selected Spring Groups ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area
    Joint Public Workshop for Minimum Flows and Levels Priority Lists and Schedules for the CFWI Area St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) September 5, 2019 St. Cloud, Florida 1 Agenda 1. Introductions and Background……... Don Medellin, SFWMD 2. SJRWMD MFLs Priority List……Andrew Sutherland, SJRWMD 3. SWFWMD MFLs Priority List..Doug Leeper, SWFWMD 4. SFWMD MFLs Priority List……Don Medellin, SFWMD 5. Stakeholder comments 6. Adjourn 2 Statutory Directive for MFLs Water management districts or DEP must establish MFLs that set the limit or level… “…at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area.” Section 373.042(1), Florida Statutes 3 Statutory Directive for Reservations Water management districts may… “…reserve from use by permit applicants, water in such locations and quantities, and for such seasons of the year, as in its judgment may be required for the protection of fish and wildlife or the public health and safety.” Section 373.223(4), Florida Statutes 4 District Priority Lists and Schedules Meet Statutory and Rule Requirements ▪ Prioritization is based on the importance of waters to the State or region, and the existence of or potential for significant harm ▪ Includes waters experiencing or reasonably expected to experience adverse impacts ▪ MFLs the districts will voluntarily subject to independent scientific peer review are identified ▪ Proposed reservations are identified ▪ Listed water bodies that have the potential to be affected by withdrawals in an adjacent water management district are identified 5 2019 Draft Priority List and Schedule ▪ Annual priority list and schedule required by statute for each district ▪ Presented to respective District Governing Boards for approval ▪ Submitted to DEP for review by Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Guilds Among Artificial-Reef Fishes in the Northern Gulf of Mexico Brian D
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Aquila Digital Community Gulf of Mexico Science Volume 14 Article 3 Number 2 Number 2 1996 Feeding Guilds Among Artificial-Reef Fishes in the Northern Gulf of Mexico Brian D. Nelson University of West Florida Stephen A. Bortone University of West Florida DOI: 10.18785/goms.1402.03 Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/goms Recommended Citation Nelson, B. D. and S. A. Bortone. 1996. Feeding Guilds Among Artificial-Reef Fishes in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Gulf of Mexico Science 14 (2). Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/goms/vol14/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf of Mexico Science by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nelson and Bortone: Feeding Guilds Among Artificial-Reef Fishes in the Northern Gulf Gulf of Mexico Scimce, 1996(2), pp. 66-80 Feeding Guilds Among Artificial-Reef Fishes in the Northern Gulf of Mexico BRIAN D. NELSON AND STEPHEN A. BORTONE To examine the diets of 25 demersal artificial-reef-associated fish species, 540 fishes were collected with spears and hand-nets off Panama City, Florida, in the summer of 1993. Fishes were preserved whole in the field. Stomach contents were later analyzed by frequency of occurrence, numerical abundance, and percent volume. These measures were combined into an Index of Relative Importance (IRI).
    [Show full text]