REVIEWS DOI: 10.1002/adsc.200700082 Enzyme Immobilization: The Quest for Optimum Performance Roger A. Sheldona,* a Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 136, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands Fax : (+31)-15-278-1415; e-mail:
[email protected] Received: February 5, 2007 Abstract: Immobilization is often the key to optimiz- 3.1 Synthetic Organic Polymers ing the operational performance of an enzyme in in- 3.2 Biopolymers dustrial processes, particularly for use in non-aque- 3.3 Hydrogels ous media. Different methods for the immobilization 3.4 Inorganic Supports of enzymes are critically reviewed. The methods are 3.5 Smart Polymers divided into three main categories, viz. (i) binding to 4 Entrapment a prefabricated support (carrier), (ii) entrapment in 5 Carrier-Free Immobilization by Cross-Linking organic or inorganic polymer matrices, and (iii) 5.1 Cross-Linked Enzyme Crystals (CLECs) cross-linking of enzyme molecules. Emphasis is 5.2 Cross-Linked Enzyme Aggregates(CLEAsACHTUNGRE ) placed on relatively recent developments, such as the 6 Combi-CLEAs and Catalytic Cascade Processes use of novel supports, e.g., mesoporous silicas, hydro- 7 Enzyme-Immobilized Microchannel Reactors for gels, and smart polymers, novel entrapment methods Process Intensification and cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs). 8 Conclusions and Prospects 1 Introduction 2 Types of Immobilization Keywords: biotransformations; cross-linked enzyme 3Immobilization on Supports: Carrier-Bound En- aggregates; entrapment; enzymes; immobilization; zymes support binding 1 Introduction specificity, activity, selectivity, stability and pH opti- mum. Nonetheless, industrial application is often In the drive towards green, sustainable methodologies hampered by a lack of long-term operational stability for chemicals manufacture[1] biocatalysis has much to and difficult recovery and re-use of the enzyme.