DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Oakland MEASURE Y EVALUATION 2008-2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Oakland MEASURE Y EVALUATION 2008-2009 City of Oakland MEASURE Y EVALUATION 2008-2009 IndividualInitiative WideViolence Report Prevention Program Reports Acknowledgements We wish to express our appreciation for the contributions of all of the agencies, organizations and individuals who participated in the 2008-2009 evaluation of the City of Oakland’s Measure Y Violence Prevention and Public Safety Act. Thank you to the Violence Prevention Programs for your time and commitment to this evaluation. We have appreciated your thoughtful feedback and have benefited from your knowledge. Your cooperation and energy resulted in the collection of extensive data and allowed us to prepare this report. Moreover, our Evaluation Team has tremendous respect and admiration for your contribution to the health and wellbeing of the residents of Oakland, both young and old. Thank you also to the Oakland Police Department and all of its public safety officers for their support and cooperation during this evaluation. Essential to this effort was Deputy Chief David Kozicki, whose time and energy we appreciate. We acknowledge the invaluable contribution of Mark Min and the staff of CitySpan for creating and operating the Youth Services and Information System used by the Violence Prevention Programs. Thank you to the Oakland Unified School District, the Alameda County Probation Department and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation for providing the evaluation team with the data necessary to measure outcomes for Measure Y participants. Our gratitude also goes to the staff of the Oakland City Administrator’s Office, and the City of Oakland Department of Human Services. A special thanks to Sara Bedford, Dyanna Christie and Priya Jagannathan at DHS who provided invaluable hands-on assistance to the VPP programs during this year. We are also grateful to Jeff Baker, Assistant to the City Administrator, for his guidance and unwavering dedication to this evaluation and to Measure Y. Lastly, we would like to express our thanks to the many people who shared their opinions with us through a telephone survey. Patricia Marrone Bennett, Ph.D serves as the evaluation team leader of the Measure Y Evaluation Team. Please address any questions or comments to [email protected]. This report has been prepared by Resource Development Associates, in partnership with Gibson & Associates and Mark Morris Associates. Evaluation Team Resource Development Associates Patricia Marrone Bennett, Ph.D. Nishi Moonka, Ed.M. Kayce Garcia Rane, M.C.P. Moira De Nike, Ph.D. Jay Tharp Diana Sanders Jeremy Bennett, M.A. Brandon Sturdivant, M.A. Rima Spight Gibson & Associates Paul Gibson, M.A. Brightstar Ohlson, M.S. Liz Baham Azzia Zur Michelle Oppen Christie Verdadero Mark Morris Associates Mark Morris, Ph.D. Lorenza Hall, Ph.D. Oakland Measure Y Evaluation Report 2008-2009 Volume 2: Individual Program Reports CONTENTS Section I: School-Based Prevention Projects.................................................................. A. Attitudinal Healing Restorative Justice Training ................................................. 1-11 B. OUSD Second Step Violence Prevention, Conflict Resolution............................. 1-9 C. OUSD Alt. Ed., Gang Prevention and Capacity Building ................................... 1-10 D. Project Re-Connect Parent Education ................................................................. 1-7 E. AHCSA Safe Passages Middle School Mentoring ............................................... 1-9 F. Sports4Kids.......................................................................................................... 1-9 Section II: Street/Youth Outreach and Engagement...................................................... A. California Youth Outreach.................................................................................. 1-10 B. Healthy Oakland .................................................................................................. 1-9 C. Youth Uprising Outreach and Case Management ............................................... 1-9 D. City County Neighborhood Initiative................................................................... 1-10 E. East Bay Agency for Children ............................................................................ 1-12 F. East Bay Asian Youth Center............................................................................. 1-13 G. Leadership Excellence ..................................................................................... 1-12 H. Radical Roving Recreation ................................................................................ 1-10 I. Youth Alive Caught in th Crossfire- Highliand Hospital........................................ 1-12 J. Youth Alive Street Outreach......................................................................................... 1-13 K. Youth UpRising Mayor’s Street Outreah .............................................................. 1-8 Section III: Employment and Training................................................................................ A. America Works Transitional Jobs....................................................................... 1-10 B. BAVC Afterschool Jobs....................................................................................... 1-9 C. Goodwill Industries of the Greater East Bay ........................................................ 1-9 D. Volunteers of America Bay Area Crew-Based Employment ................................ 1-9 E. Youth Employment Partnership Afterschool Job Training.................................... 1-7 F. Youth Employment Partnership Summer Employment ........................................ 1-6 G. Youth Employment Partnership Transitional Jobs ............................................... 1-7 H. Youth Radio Afterschool Jobs............................................................................ 1-11 Section IV: Diversion and Reentry...................................................................................... A. Allen Temple Intensive Reentry Employment ...................................................... 1-8 B. Youth Employment Partnership Intensive Reentry Employment......................... 1-9 C. Allen Temple Project Choice................................................................................ 1-8 D. Mentoring Center Project Choice......................................................................... 1-7 E. Mentoring Center Pathways to Change ............................................................... 1-9 F. Volunteers of America Bay Area Project Choice.................................................. 1-9 Section V: Special Services – Exposure to Violence..................................................... A. Alameda County Behavioral Health Crisis Response & Support Network ........... 1-8 B. Alameda County Sexually Exploited Minors Network ........................................ 1-10 C. Catholic Charities of the East Bay Crisis Response & Support Network ............. 1-8 D. Early Childhood Mental Health Collaborative....................................................... 1-8 E. Family Violence Law Center Family Violence Intervention Unit ........................... 1-9 F. Youth Justice Institute Youth Support Groups...................................................... 1-8 Measure Y Evaluation 2008 - 2009 Attitudinal Healing Restorative Justice Training (RJOY) I. PROGRAM OVERVIEW II. INPUTS Evaluation Questions: Research Questions: What are the goals and objectives of How much was spent on services? the Program? What outcomes is the Who was involved with the program? program trying to accomplish? What What data collection methods were is the theoretical basis of the used? Who was served? program model? OMY Funding Goals and Objectives During the 2008-2009 program year, The overarching goal of RJOY is to RJOY received $210,750 from the effectuate a change in the way Measure Y VPP Initiative. municipal culture conceptualizes and Staff and Partners administers justice. By seeding Measure Y provided services for 2 restorative justice measures in schools, FTEs, an Executive Director, and a communities, and the justice system, School Coordinator. Additionally, RJOY RJOY serves as a catalyst for individual employs 1 FTE and 2 volunteer staff and community healing. RJOYs with other resources. objectives are to reduce violence, truancy, suspension, and expulsion, Partners building toward healthier school RJOY employs partnerships with a environments. variety of organizations including: the Oakland Unified School District (OUSD), By aligning their services to these Safe Passages/Our Kids program, objectives, RJOY’s intended outcome is SEEDS, the Judges Task Force, and to embed restorative justice measures the Oakland and Hayward Police into the internal disciplinary structures of Departments. RJOY also provides schools and to train youth in restorative technical assistance and support to the justice, thus strengthening the McCullum Youth Court and Catholic relationships between young people, Charities of the East Bay to develop and parents, and school staff. RJOY enhance the restorative justice approaches their work with the components of their respective theoretical presupposition that programs. employing restorative justice principles and practices can transform the cultures Although 45% of RJOY’s clients are of schools and communities and thereby referred through their partner reduce the incidence of violence and organizations, the referral source of the negative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • April 20, 2016 Re: Funding Recommendation for OFCY 2016-20196 Grants
    Oakland Fund for Children and Youth Meeting of the Planning and Oversight Committee (POC) April 20th, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. Oakland City Hall, Council Chambers 1 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, CA 94612 AGENDA 1. Call to Order Introductions &Announcements Agenda Review/Modifications 2. Open Forum for Youth and Parents of Young Children 3. Adoption of Prior Meeting Minutes from February 3rd 2016 action 4. Adoption of POC Ad-Hoc Review Subcommittee OFCY Grant Funding action Recommendations for FY2016-2019 5. Administrative Matters Appeals Process General Announcements Upcoming Meetings/ Scheduling 6. Open Forum 7. Adjournment Public Comment: The POC welcomes you to its meetings and your interest is appreciated. If you wish to speak before the POC, please fill out a speaker card and hand it to the staff of the POC. If you wish to speak on a matter not on the agenda, please sign up for Open Forum and wait for your name to be called. If you wish to speak on a matter on the agenda, please approach the Committee when called, give your name, and your comments. Please be brief and limit your comments to the specific subject under discussion. Only matters within the POC’s jurisdiction may be addressed. Time limitations shall be at the discretion of the Chair. In compliance with Oakland’s policy for people with chemical allergies, please refrain from wearing strongly scented products to meetings. In compliance with the American Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in the meetings for the Oakland Fund for Children and Youth Planning & Oversight Committee, please contact the Oakland Fund for Children and Youth at 510-238-6379.
    [Show full text]
  • Oak023012.Pdf
    CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES v FOREWORD vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 What is the Urban Land Redevelopment Program? 1 1.2 How the ULR Program Can Assist You 1 2.0 OAKLAND RISK-BASED CORRECTIVE ACTION APPROACH 3 2.1 Understanding the Tiered RBCA Process 3 2.2 Qualifying for the Oakland RBCA Levels 5 2.3 Characterizing Your Site 7 2.3.1 Source Characterization 7 2.3.2 Identification of Potential Exposure Pathways and Receptors 7 2.3.3 Land Use Scenario 8 2.3.4 Soil Categorization 9 2.4 Reading the Oakland RBCA Look-up Tables 10 3.0 ESTABLISHING CORRECTIVE ACTION STANDARDS 13 3.1 Identifying the Lead Regulatory Agency 13 3.2 Undergoing the Tier 1 Process 14 3.3 Undergoing the Tier 2 Process 15 3.4 Undergoing the Tier 3 Process 15 4.0 PREPARING A CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN 17 4.1 Applying RBCA Levels 17 4.2 Using Containment Measures 17 4.3 Implementing Institutional Controls 18 4.4 Complying with Public Notification Requirements 19 5.0 OBTAINING REGULATORY SITE CLOSURE 21 5.1 Receiving a “No Further Action” Letter 21 5.2 Implementing a Risk Management Plan 21 APPENDICES 23 A. Agency Contacts 23 B. Schools and Community-Based Organizations 25 C. City of Oakland Permit Tracking 47 D. Exposure Assessment Worksheet 49 E. Tier 1 Risk-Based Screening Levels 51 F. Tier 2 Site-Specific Target Levels 63 G. Tier 3 Guidance 95 H. Example Oakland RBCA Cover Sheet 101 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 103 NOTES 107 OAKLAND URBAN LAND REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM iii LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Tables 1.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council Agenda Reports
    DISTRIBUTION DATE: December 16, 2016 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & FROM: Sabrina B. Landreth CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: City Administrator’s Weekly Report DATE: December 16, 2016 _______ INFORMATION With the legislative recess, the next edition of the City Administrator’s Weekly Report will be published on January 6, 2017. Following are the key activities to be highlighted this week: Upcoming Holiday Closures – On Monday, December 26 and Monday, January 2, the City of Oakland’s administrative offices will be closed in observance of the Christmas Day holiday and the New Year’s Day holiday. While the City’s administrative employees are out of the office, if a situation arises that requires more staffing, the City has a plan in place to call in additional resources. Police, fire and emergency services are not affected during the holiday. To read the media release for specific service impacts, please visit http://www2.oaklandnet.com/w/OAK061925. Annual Holiday Food Drive – Through Friday, December 23, the City of Oakland is holding its Annual Holiday Food Drive. The Alameda County-Oakland Community Action Partnership (AC- OCAP), in partnership with Alameda County Community Food Bank, is coordinating the food drive. The Alameda County Community Food Bank serves one in five residents of Alameda County. The cost of living in the Bay Area has made it nearly impossible for many households to make ends meet. Children and seniors remain the most vulnerable to hunger in our community. Food collection barrels are in the lobbies at the following locations: City Hall, 1 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza Wilson Building, 150 Frank H.
    [Show full text]
  • 2600 Telegraph Ave. MODIFIED MASSING - SUN / SHADOW STUDY Oakland, CA DATE: 11.07.2019 PROJECT NO.: 19015 A1 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
    2600 TELEGRAPH AVENUE PROJECT CEQA ANALYSIS Prepared for: City of Oakland Bureau of Planning 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 2114 Oakland, California 94612 Prepared by: 1630 San Pablo Avenue Suite 300 Oakland, California 94612 JUNE 2020 Table of Contents SECTION PAGE NO. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................ 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 3 1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 General Plan Land Use and Transportation EIR ................................................................................... 5 1.2 General Plan Housing Element Update EIR and Addendum .............................................................. 6 1.3 Central District Urban Renewal Plan Amendments EIR ............................................................................. 7 1.4 Standard Conditions of Approval ........................................................................................................ 8 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Project Location ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wildfire Prevention Planning DATE: September 14, 2020
    DISTRIBUTION DATE: Sept. 15, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & FROM: Joe DeVries CITY COUNCIL Director, Interdepartmental Operations SUBJECT: Wildfire Prevention Planning DATE: September 14, 2020 City Administrator Date: Sep 15, 2020 Approval INFORMATION On November 19, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 87940 C.M.S., declaring Wildfire Prevention a top priority for the City of Oakland and requesting the City Administrator to present a comprehensive report to the Public Safety Committee (PSC) that addresses Oakland’s Wildfire Prevention Strategies within 180 days. The specific guidance in the resolution was as follow: Submit a Report That Addresses: 1) How City Departments Will Address Wildfire Prevention In Their Planning, Programs And Projects For Oakland’s Wildland Urban Interface (WUI), Including The Extent To Which The Strategies Will Involve Multi-Disciplinary And Multi- Agency Teams In The Development Of Pre-Fire Plans, 2) What Wildfire Prevention Plans Will Include Such As Home Hardening, Evacuation And Other Wildfire Prevention Strategies For Both Private And Public Properties, And Public Communication Strategies, Before, During And After A Wildfire Event, And 3) The Extent To Which Wildfire Prevention Will Be Addressed In The Next Updates To The City’s General Plan, Safety, Open Space, Hazard Mitigation Plans And Other Similar Plans. BACKGROUND / LEGISLATIVE HISTORY Wildfires are a natural part of California’s landscape and the potential risk of wildfires impacting communities in, and adjacent to, forested areas is at an all-time high. In the last few years, California has experienced the deadliest and most destructive wildfires in its history. Oakland’s history of wildfires is no secret in California, the Oakland firestorm of 1991 was one of the largest urban wildfires.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2020-21 Master Fee Schedule
    CIT Y OF OA KLA ND C ALF ORNIA Fiscal Year 2020-21 Master Fee Schedule [Type text] CITY OF OAKLAND MASTER FEE SCHEDULE Effective: July 1, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Description and Process ..................................................................................................................... 1 FY 2019‐20 Master Fee Schedule Adopting Legislation (Ordinance No. 13599 CMS)............................... 2 Master Fee Schedule Department Contacts ........................................................................................ 5 Citywide Services ........................................................................................................................... A‐1 Duplication & Postage .................................................................................................................... A‐1 Credit Card Convenience ................................................................................................................ A‐1 Office of the City Administrator .......................................................................................................B‐1 Contract Compliance ...................................................................................................................... B‐1 Special Activities ............................................................................................................................ B‐1 Nuisance Enforcement Unit ........................................................................................................... B‐4 Animal Shelter
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, And/Or Mitigation Measures 4.1 Land Use
    4.0 Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Avoidance, Minimization, and/or Mitigation Measures 4.1 Land Use 4.1.1 Introduction to Analysis/Methodology Land use is broadly defined to encompass types of land use and land use mix, development patterns and activity centers, population and employment levels, growth potential and trends, local and regional land use policies, and other factors that influence corridor growth. The setting conditions and projections for the analysis are based on land use, development, employment, and population data from the U.S. Census Bureau, the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), Alameda County. the Cities of Berkeley, Oakland, and San Leandro; the AC Transit East Bay BRT Project Land Use Report prepared in 2005 provided a land use database of existing conditions, which has been subsequently updated. The land use database and growth scenario were developed specifically for analysis of the proposed project and the database was divided into traffic analysis zones (TAZ) for use in the transportation modeling. As a result, for the purpose of land use analysis, the specific boundaries of the corridor subareas are defined by TAZ boundaries, which also correspond to Census Block Groups. The study area includes one-half mile on either side of the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) alignment, which encompasses the average distance people are willing to walk to a transit stop For the purposes of this analysis, the corridor has been divided into eight subareas—the Berkeley subarea in the City of Berkeley; the North Oakland, Central Oakland, San Antonio, Fruitvale, Central East Oakland, and Elmhurst subareas in the City of Oakland; and the San Leandro subarea in the City of San Leandro.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Oakland Standard Contract Provisions February 2015
    Port of Oakland Standard Contract Provisions February 2015 PORT OF OAKLAND STANDARD CONTRACT PROVISIONS FEBRUARY 2015 PORT OF OAKLAND THE BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS ROOM 629 530 WATER STREET OAKLAND, CA 94607 Port of Oakland Standard Contract Provisions February 2015 Preface Pursuant to the Port of Oakland Purchasing Ordinance, the Port of Oakland Standard Contract Provisions (Standard Contract Provisions) is incorporated by reference into Project Manuals issued by the Port for public works construction projects. Modifications to the Standard Contract Provisions implemented since the most recent published edition of the Standard Contract Provisions, and any project-specific modifications to the Standard Contract Provisions (e.g., modifications to the General Conditions, deletion of OCIP-related documents for non-OCIP projects, etc.) will be included in Document 00800, Modifications to Standard Contract Provisions of the Project Manual. Knowledge of these Standard Contract Provisions and other contract requirements included in the project-specific Project Manual is essential for all contractors bidding and undertaking construction work for the Port of Oakland. Revision History: First Edition approved by Board of Port Commissioners on October 19, 2004 [Resolution No. 04298]. Second Edition approved by Board of Port Commissioners on November 17, 2009 [Resolution No. 09165]. Third Edition approved by Board of Port Commissioners on February 26, 2015 [Resolution No. 15-017]. Port of Oakland Standard Contract Provisions February 2015 DOCUMENT
    [Show full text]
  • The East Bay Hills Fire, Oakland-Berkeley, California
    U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series The East Bay Hills Fire Oakland-Berkeley, California USFA-TR-060/October 1991 U.S. Fire Administration Fire Investigations Program he U.S. Fire Administration develops reports on selected major fires throughout the country. The fires usually involve multiple deaths or a large loss of property. But the primary criterion T for deciding to do a report is whether it will result in significant “lessons learned.” In some cases these lessons bring to light new knowledge about fire--the effect of building construction or contents, human behavior in fire, etc. In other cases, the lessons are not new but are serious enough to highlight once again, with yet another fire tragedy report. In some cases, special reports are devel- oped to discuss events, drills, or new technologies which are of interest to the fire service. The reports are sent to fire magazines and are distributed at National and Regional fire meetings. The International Association of Fire Chiefs assists the USFA in disseminating the findings throughout the fire service. On a continuing basis the reports are available on request from the USFA; announce- ments of their availability are published widely in fire journals and newsletters. This body of work provides detailed information on the nature of the fire problem for policymakers who must decide on allocations of resources between fire and other pressing problems, and within the fire service to improve codes and code enforcement, training, public fire education, building technology, and other related areas. The Fire Administration, which has no regulatory authority, sends an experienced fire investigator into a community after a major incident only after having conferred with the local fire authorities to insure that the assistance and presence of the USFA would be supportive and would in no way interfere with any review of the incident they are themselves conducting.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Oakland Fire Chief
    CITY OF OAKLAND FIRE CHIEF THE CITY AND COMMUNITY OF OAKLAND for all city operations and is supported by two Assistant City Oakland is a dynamic city with 50 distinct and eclectic Administrators. The City Administrator has overall responsibility neighborhoods, 17 commercial districts, an increasingly for day-to-day administrative and fiscal operations of the City vibrant downtown, a strong economic base, world-class arts including hiring of Department Directors. and entertainment venues, superior cultural and recreational amenities, and a rich multicultural heritage. Oakland is the OAKLAND FIRE DEPARTMENT (OFD) eighth largest city in California with an estimated population of 429,082 (2018 U.S. Census Bureau). The city serves as the MISSION STATEMENT administrative seat of Alameda County and the center of The proud men and women of the Oakland Fire Department commerce and international trade for Northern California. (OFD) are committed to providing the highest quality and highest level of courteous and responsive services to the Oakland is one of the most diverse and ethnically integrated residents and visitors of Oakland. urban cities in the nation, with balanced representation from African-American, Latinx, Asian, and Caucasian residents, This mission is accomplished by implementing comprehensive speaking more than 125 languages and dialects, as well as strategies and training in fire prevention, fire suppression, having one of the country’s largest Lesbian Gay Bisexual emergency medical services, and all risk mitigation, Transgender Queer (LGBTQ) communities. Located on the including human-caused and natural disasters, emergency bay, six miles east of San Francisco, it encompasses 56 square preparedness, 9-1-1 services and community-based fire miles, with 19 miles of San Francisco Bay coastline to the west services.
    [Show full text]
  • THE OAKLAND MUNICIPAL CODE Prepared by The
    THE OAKLAND MUNICIPAL CODE Prepared by the MUNICIPAL TECHNICAL ADVISORY SERVICE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC SERVICE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE in cooperation with the TENNESSEE MUNICIPAL LEAGUE November 1999 Change 2, June 16, 2016 TOWN OF OAKLAND, TENNESSEE MAYOR Chris Goodman ALDERMEN Karl Chambliss Billy Ray Morris Kelly Rector Kenneth Carter CITY RECORDER Bob Petty ii PREFACE The Oakland Municipal Code contains the codification and revision of the ordinances of the Town of Oakland, Tennessee. By referring to the historical citation appearing at the end of each section, the user can determine the origin of each particular section. The absence of a historical citation means that the section was added by the codifier. The word "modified" in the historical citation indicates significant modification of the original ordinance. The code is arranged into titles, chapters, and sections. Related matter is kept together, so far as possible, within the same title. Each section number is complete within itself, containing the title number, the chapter number, and the section of the chapter of which it is a part. Specifically, the first digit, followed by a hyphen, identifies the title number. The second digit identifies the chapter number, and the last two digits identify the section number. For example, title 2, chapter 1, section 6, is designated as section 2-106. By utilizing the table of contents and the analysis preceding each title and chapter of the code, together with the cross references and explanations included as footnotes, the user should locate all the provisions in the code relating to any question that might arise.
    [Show full text]
  • L. Public Services and Facilities
    IV. Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures L. Public Services and Facilities This section describes existing public services and facilities at the Kaiser Permanente OMC project site and vicinity. It also analyzes the impact of the project on the delivery of public services, and possible adverse physical impacts to the environment that could result from a need to provide new or physically altered facilities, resulting from the project. The analysis reviews fire protection, emergency medical response, police services, public schools, parks and recreation facilities, and libraries, and potential impacts are identified, as necessary. Setting Police Protection Services Facilities and Staffing The Oakland Police Department provides police protection services throughout the city. The Police Department is headquartered at 455 7th Street in downtown Oakland, and there is one sub- station located at 2651 23rd Avenue. The Police Department is authorized for 739 full-time, sworn police officers and about 427 civilian (non-sworn) employees. Currently, there are 722 sworn police officers and a civilian staff of about 340 (Poulson, 2004). The ratio of police officers per 1,000 residents is approximately 1.8, based on the City’s population, as of January 1, 2004, of 411,609 from the California Department of Finance. The city of Oakland is divided into six geographic areas and 35 patrol beats. Each patrol beat generally includes an area with between 5,000 and 7,000 residents. A neighborhood services coordinator, a civilian employee that acts as the liaison between the community and the Police Department, is assigned to each patrol beat. The neighborhood services coordinator works with the community to set priorities and develop strategies to improve public safety and reduce crime.
    [Show full text]