Certificate in Clinical Assessment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Unit 1 Introduction to Psychodynamic Theories Of
Introduction to Psychodynamic UNIT 1 INTRODUCTION TO Theories of Personality PSYCHODYNAMIC THEORIES OF PERSONALITY Structure 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Objectives 1.2 Personality 1.3 Psychodynamics 1.3.1 History 1.3.2 Freudian Psychodynamics 1.3.3 Jungian Psychodynamics 1.3.4 Positive Psychology 1.4 Psychoanalysis 1.4.1 Key Terms of Psychoanalytical Theory 1.4.2 Strengths of Psychoanalysis 1.4.3 Criticisms of Psychoanalysis 1.5 Psychodynamic Theory of Personality 1.5.1 Psychodynamic Treatment 1.6 Other Psychodynamic Theorists 1.7 Let Us Sum Up 1.8 Unit End Questions 1.9 Suggested Readings 1.0 INTRODUCTION Personality is made up of the characteristic patterns of thoughts, feelings, and behaviours that make a person unique. Personality is fundamental to the study of psychology. In this unit we will introduce the theory of Personality based on Psychodynamic approach. The term psychodynamic refers to a wide group of theories that emphasise the overriding influence of instinctive drives and forces, and the importance of development experiences in shaping personality. Early in their development, these theories focused solely on the influence of unconscious drives and forces, but they received much criticism and subsequent revision. Most recent psychodynamic theory places greater emphasis on conscious experience and its interaction with the unconscious, in addition to the role that social factors play in development. Psychodynamic theories are in basic agreement that the study of human behaviour should include factors such as internal processes, personality, motivation and drives, and the importance of childhood experiences. Classic theories about the role of the unconscious sexual and aggressive drives have been re-evaluated to focus on conscious experience, resulting in, for example, the birth of ego psychology. -
General Aims and Objectives 16
Department of Psychosocial Studies Master of Science in The Psychodynamics of Human Development Course Handbook 2020 - 2021 PG Diploma/MSc in the Psychodynamics of Human Development Contents CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 4 THE BRITISH PSYCHOTHERAPY FOUNDATION 4 THE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOSOCIAL STUDIES AT BIRKBECK 5 COURSE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE 7 THE COURSE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE 7 COURSE TEAMS 7 THE LIBRARIES 8 OTHER FACILITIES AT BPF KILBURN AND BIRKBECK COLLEGE 9 TERM DATES AND TIMES OF SEMINARS 10 STUDY DAYS 11 STRUCTURE OF THE COURSE 12 GENERAL AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 16 FIRST YEAR COURSE COMPONENTS 17 PSYCHOANALYTIC OR JUNGIAN ANALYTIC THEORY: COURSE COMPONENT PSSL001H7 (15 CREDITS) 17 WORK DISCUSSION: COURSE COMPONENT PSSL002H7 (15 CREDITS) 19 ANALYTIC REFLECTION ON INFANT OBSERVATION: COURSE COMPONENT PSSLO16S7 (30 CREDITS) 20 ASSESSED WORK YEAR 1 23 Page 1 MSc/PGDip in the Psychodynamics of Human Development FAILED ASSIGNMENTS 24 FEEDBACK AND SUPPORT 25 CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT 25 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR ALL FIRST YEAR ASSIGNMENTS 26 THE DISSERTATION MODULE (PSSL003D7): YEAR 1 28 SECOND YEAR COURSE COMPONENTS 29 CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN PSYCHOANALYTIC OR JUNGIAN ANALYTIC THEORY COMPONENT 29 WORK DISCUSSION TWO 31 INFANT OBSERVATION 2: COURSE COMPONENT PSSL002D7 (60 CREDITS) 33 THE INFANT OBSERVATION PAPER 34 DISSERTATION: COURSE COMPONENT PSSL003D7 (60 CREDITS) 35 THE DISSERTATION 37 DISSERTATION DEVELOPMENT TASKS 40 ASSESSED WORK - YEAR 2 42 PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSMENT 42 FINAL AWARD FOR THE MSC 43 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR DISSERTATION 45 ASSESSMENT -
Digging up the Past Object Relations and Subpersonalities
DIGGING UP THE PAST OBJECT RELATIONS AND SUBPERSONALITIES by Chris Meriam Psychosynthesis Palo Alto Monograph Series ψσ Published by: Psychosynthesis Palo Alto 461 Hawthorne Avenue Palo Alto, California 94301 U.S.A. Copyright © 1994 by Chris Meriam All rights reserved. CONTENTS Preface .............................................................................. 4 Digging up the Past ....................................................... 7 Three Components of Current Subpersonality Theory ........ 8 Some Limitations of Current Subpersonality Theory ........ 11 The Nature of Object Relations ............................................... 15 A Psychoanalytic View of Splitting ......................................... 16 Psychoanalytic Object Relations ............................................. 22 A Psychosynthesis View of Splitting ...................................... 28 Psychosynthesis Object Relations ........................................... 32 The Development of Subpersonalities ................................... 37 The Anxious Pleaser ................................................................... 39 In Conclusion ............................................................................... 45 About the Author .......................................................... 49 Bibliography .................................................................. 49 P REFACE Roberto Assagioli (1965) used the term “subpersonalities” to refer to those often-conflicting, semi-autonomous subsystems within the personality which have -
A Commonsense Reasoning Framework for Explanatory Emotion Attribution, Generation and Re-Classification
A Commonsense Reasoning Framework for Explanatory Emotion Attribution, Generation and Re-classification Antonio Lietoa,b, Gian Luca Pozzatoa, Stefano Zoiaa, Viviana Pattia, Rossana Damianoa aUniversity of Turin, Department of Computer Science, Turin, Italy bICAR-CNR, Palermo, Italy Abstract We present DEGARI (Dynamic Emotion Generator And ReclassIfier), an explain- able system for emotion attribution and recommendation. This system relies on a re- cently introduced commonsense reasoning framework, the TCL logic, which is based on a human-like procedure for the automatic generation of novel concepts in a Descrip- tion Logics knowledge base. Starting from an ontological formalization of emotions based on the Plutchik model, known as ArsEmotica, the system exploits the logic TCL to automatically generate novel commonsense semantic representations of compound emotions (e.g. Love as derived from the combination of Joy and Trust according to Plutchik). The generated emotions correspond to prototypes, i.e. commonsense repre- sentations of given concepts, and have been used to reclassify emotion-related contents in a variety of artistic domains, ranging from art datasets to the editorial contents avail- able in RaiPlay, the online platform of RAI Radiotelevisione Italiana (the Italian public broadcasting company). We show how the reported results (evaluated in the light of the obtained reclassifications, the user ratings assigned to such reclassifications, and their arXiv:2101.04017v5 [cs.AI] 2 Jun 2021 explainability) are encouraging, and pave the way to many further research directions. Keywords: Explainable AI, Commonsense reasoning, Knowledge Generation, Concept Combination, Computational Models of Emotion 1. Introduction and Background Emotions have been acknowledged as a key part of the aesthetic experience through all ages and cultures, as witnessed by terms such as “sublime” [53] and “pathos” [52], Preprint submitted to Elsevier June 3, 2021 associated with the experience of art since the ancient times. -
Development of Research Designs for Investigating Concepts of Analytical Psychology and the Efficacy/Effectiveness of Jungian Psychotherapy
Development of research designs for investigating concepts of Analytical Psychology and the efficacy/effectiveness of Jungian psychotherapy Prof. Dr. Christian Roesler Professor of Clinical Psychology With assistance from Julia Engelhardt Telefon +49 761 200-1513 Fax +49 761 200-1496 E-Mail: [email protected] ____________________________________________________________________ Karlstraße 63 79104 Freiburg www.kh-freiburg.de 2 1. Introduction Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961) is one of the founding fathers of modern psychotherapy. After some years of collaboration with Freud at the beginning of the 20th century, Jung broke ties with Freud in 1912 and developed his own psychoanalytic approach, later called Analytical Psychology (AP). Jung had a major influence on the development of psychotherapy. His use of creative techniques made him the founder of art therapy methods; he was the first to use techniques of imagination to influence the inner world of patients, a method that has recently been adopted in a number of psychotherapy approaches (e.g., the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder); and he was the first to postulate that in the training of psychoanalysts there should be an extensive training analysis. In spite of this influence and the fact that Jungian psychotherapy is well established all over the world in mental health care as well as in training structures, there are few publications on the empirical foundations of Jungian psychology and the effectiveness of Jungian psychotherapy. Although Jungian psychotherapy has a long history and has been practiced for more than 100 years, the Jungian approach has long been criticized for a lack of proof of its effectiveness. -
Stakeholder Position Statement on the NICE Guidelines for Depression In
Stakeholder position statement on the NICE guideline for depression in adults Organisational signatories All-Party Parliamentary Group for Prescribed Drug Dependence: Rt Hon Sir Oliver Letwin MP, Chair Association for Dance Movement Psychotherapy UK (ADMP UK): Jackie Edwards, Chair Association for Family Therapy and Systemic Practice (AFT): Dr Reenee Singh, CEO Association for Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy in the NHS (APP): Andrew Soutter, Chair Association of Child Psychotherapists (ACP): Isobel Pick, Chair British Acupuncture Council: Robert Strange OBE, CEO British Association of Art Therapists (BAAT): Dr Val Huet (PhD), CEO British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP): Dr Andrew Reeves, Chair British Association of Social Workers: Dr Ruth Allen, CEO British Psychoanalytic Association (BPA): Dr David Simpson, President British Psychoanalytic Council (BPC): Gary Fereday, CEO British Psychoanalytic Society (and Institute of Psychoanalysis): Catalina Bronstein, President British Psychological Society (BPS): Sarb Bajwa, CEO British Psychotherapy Foundation (BPF): Mike Owen, CEO Camden Psychotherapy Unit (CPU): Ora Dresner, CEO College of Mental Health Pharmacy (CMHP): Juliet Shepherd, President Community Housing and Therapy (CHT): Dr Peter Cockersell, CEO Council for Evidence-based Psychiatry (CEP): Dr James Davies, co-founder Dochealth: Dr Antony Garelick, Director European Association for Psychotherapy (EAP): Charles Cassar, President European Association for Gestalt Therapy (EAGT): Beatrix Wimmer, President Interpersonal -
Candidate Pack Chief Executive Officer
Candidate Pack Chief Executive Officer August 2020 Contents: Introduction from the Chair 3 Background Information 4 Staff Structure Charts 9 Job Description 11 Person Specification 13 Terms and Benefits of Employment 14 How to Apply 15 Page 2 of 15 Candidate Pack for CEO Introduction from the Chair Dear Applicant, Thank you for your interest in this exciting new role with the British Psychotherapy Foundation. The BPF is a national charity, established in 2013 from a merger with three other training bodies, and is one of the UK’s leading training providers and membership bodies for people working in intensive psychoanalytical psychotherapy, Jungian analysis and child and adolescent psychotherapy. We have 400 qualified members and 150 trainee members. The organisation is a member of the British Psychoanalytic Council, through which our members are registered to practice. Based in London, with a dedicated and experienced staff team, the charity has an excellent reputation and offers an impressive range of educational, training and professional support programmes and benefits for aspiring and experienced psychotherapists wanting to specialise in intensive analytic therapies. The BPF today is operating in an environment, of course, where demand from the NHS and the general public for assistance with mental health issues – not least caused by the current Coronavirus pandemic – is acute. Our highly qualified and experienced membership are proud to be doing everything they can to help serve this demand, working closely with different health, social care, community and other professionals across many different settings. Looking to the future, the BPF’s ambition is to grow and develop the organisation as both a training provider and professional membership body but – crucially at the same time– addressing further the organisation’s pattern of operational losses each year inherited from the original merged organisations (although reduced somewhat over the last year or so). -
Criminal Psychodynamics-- a Platform Benjamin Karpman
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 47 | Issue 1 Article 2 1956 Criminal Psychodynamics-- A Platform Benjamin Karpman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Benjamin Karpman, Criminal Psychodynamics-- A Platform, 47 J. Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 8 (1956-1957) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. CRIMINAL PSYCHODYNAMICS A PLATFORM BENJAMIN KARPMAN The following is a condensation of a near one hundred page article on the same sub- ject which originally appeared in the ARCIvEs OF CRIMINAL PSYCHODYNAI CS, Vol. I, Number 1, Winter, 1955. The author has been a frequent contributor to this JOURNAL. He is a Psychotherapist on the staff of St. Elizabeths Hospital, Washington, D. C., and Editor-in-Chief of ARCHIvEs OF CRIMINAL PsYcHoDYNAImcs.-EDrTOR. Criminal psychodynamics has for its purpose the study of the genesis, develop- ment, and motivation of that aspect of human behavior that conflicts with accepted social norms and standards. The Archives of Criminal Psychodynamics will encourage research into the psychodynamics of existing knowledge on the subject, promotion of superior legal and humane understanding of the relations between the criminal and society, and the betterment of the condition of the criminal as an individual. With this as a prior formulation, let us see where we stand today as compared'with fifteen years ago, when I prepared a platform for the JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL PSYCHO- PATHOLOGY edited by the late Dr. -
Selves, Subpersonalities, and Internal Family Systems Leonard L
University of Florida Levin College of Law UF Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2013 Managing Inner and Outer Conflict: Selves, Subpersonalities, and Internal Family Systems Leonard L. Riskin University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, and the Psychology and Psychiatry Commons Recommended Citation Leonard L. Riskin, Managing Inner and Outer Conflict: Selves, Subpersonalities, and Internal Family Systems, 18 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 1 (2013), available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/323 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Managing Inner and Outer Conflict: Selves, Subpersonalities, and Internal Family Systems Leonard L. Riskin* ABSTRACT This Article describes potential benefits of considering certain processes within an individual that take place in connection * Copyright © 2013 Leonard L. Riskin. Leonard L. Riskin is Chesterfield Smith Professor of Law, University of Florida Levin College of Law, and Visiting Professor, Northwestern University School of Law. This Article grew out of a presentation at a symposium entitled "The Negotiation Within," sponsored by the Harvard Negotiation Law Review in February 2010. I am grateful to the HNLR editors for inviting me, to its faculty advisor, Professor Robert Bordone, who suggested the topic and deliberately limited his explanation of what he meant by it, and to other participants in that symposium. -
Psychology and Its History
2 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCING PSYCHOLOGY'S HISTORY • Distinguish between primary and secondary sources of historical information and describe the kinds of primary source information typically found by historians in archives • Explain how the process of doing history can produce some degree of confidence that truth has been attained PSYCHOLOGY AND ITS HISTORY One hundred is a nice round number and a one-hundredth anniversary is ample cause for celebration. In recent years, psychologists with a sense of history have celebrated often. The festivities began back in 1979, with the centennial of the founding of Wilhelm Wundt's laboratory at Leipzig, Germany. In 1992, the American Psychological Associ ation (APA) created a yearlong series of events to commemorate the centennial of its founding in G. Stanley Hall's study at Clark University on July 8, 1892. During the cen tennial year, historical articles appeared in all of the APA's journals and a special issue of American Psychologist focused on history; several books dealing with APA's history were commissioned (e.g., Evans, Sexton, & Cadwallader, 1992); regional conventions had historical themes; and the annual convention in Washington featured events ranging from the usual symposia and invited addresses on history to a fancy dress ball at Union Station featuring period (1892) costumes and a huge APA birthday cake. Interest in psychology's history has not been limited to centennial celebrations, of course. Histories of psychology were written soon after psychology itself appeared on the academic scene (e.g., Baldwin, 1913), and at least two of psychology's most famous books, E. G. -
Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy
Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy: An Evidence-Based and Effective Treatment for Trauma and Disorders of Attachment Arthur Becker-Weidman, Ph.D. Director, Center For Family Development INTRODUCTION The purpose of this article is to outline several of the elements of Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy and demonstrate the evidence base for those components. While there have been a two outcome studies using control groups that demonstrated the overall effectiveness of Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy, the treatment is an integration of several approaches, methods, and techniques that each have strong evidence and empirical bases. The two outcome studies, coupled with the evidence base for the components of Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy, provide support for the efficacy of this model of treatment. A recent meta-analysis (Craven & Lee, 2006), based on the partial and preliminary results of one study in 2004, determined that Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy is, “supported and acceptable” (p.301). There has been a substantial amount of confusion and controversary about the diagnosis and treatment of Reactive Attachment Disorder (O’Connor & Zeanah, 2003). Attachment therapy, holding therapy, and other terms are often used interchangeably, as are RAD or Reactive Attachment Disorder, Attachment Disorder, and related terms, which only adds to the confusion. Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy is not a “holding therapy” as defined by O’Connor and Zeanah (2003). They describe “holding therapy” as being based on “rage reduction” techniques and that, “the holding approach would be viewed as intrusive and therefore non-sensitive and counter therapeutic” (Italics added, p. 236). Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy has as its core, or central Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy therapeutic mechanism for treatment success, the maintenance of a contingent, collaborative, sensitive, reflective, and affectively attuned relationship between therapist and child, between caregiver and child, and between therapist and caregiver. -
Self-Report Inventory for Disorders of Extreme Stress (SIDES-SR) Manual
Last updated 3.11.2019 Structured Interview for Disorders of Extreme Stress (SIDES) & Self-Report Inventory for Disorders of Extreme Stress (SIDES-SR) Manual Joseph Spinazzola, Ph.D. (Unpublished manuscript) DESCRIPTION The SIDES is a 45-item instrument which asks patients to describe their past and current functioning on six dimensions: (1) disorders of affect regulation, (2) amnesia and dissociation, (3) somatization, (4) disruptions in self-perception, (5) disorders in relationships with others, and (6) disrupted systems of meaning. These six dimensions represent the areas of impairment of the Disorders of Extreme Stress (DESNOS) construct. This constellation of dimensions is represented in the DSM-IV under Associated Features of PTSD (p. 425). The SIDES instrument may be administered either as a clinical interview or as a self-report measure. For each item, a respondent rates both lifetime presence (as a “yes/no” dichotomy), as well as current symptom presence and severity during the past month. Item descriptors contain concrete behavioral anchors in order to better facilitate patient responses and/or clinician ratings. The clinician-administered version of this instrument was utilized during the DSM-IV Field Trials for PTSD. Important Note: As of 2019, there are no plans for further validation or update of the SIDES instruments. Further, the DESNOS construct is not aligned with the formulation of Complex- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (C-PTSD) that has been developed, empirically validated and formally accepted for inclusion in the 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-II), the prevailing medical and mental health diagnostic classification system worldwide published by the World Health Organization (WHO).