Hearing Corporeal Memories in Cameraperson and Stories We Tell

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hearing Corporeal Memories in Cameraperson and Stories We Tell Towards Affective Listening: Hearing Corporeal Memories in Cameraperson and Stories We Tell THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alper Gobel, B.A. Graduate Program in Film Studies The Ohio State University 2019 Master’s Examination Committee: Margaret Flinn, Advisor Erica Levin Sean O’Sullivan Copyrighted by Alper Gobel 2019 Abstract This thesis focuses on two documentaries: Kirsten Johnson’s Cameraperson (2016) and Sarah Polley’s Stories We Tell (2012). By proposing the term affective listening, it foregrounds affective engagement with the voice of documentary. The thesis argues that listening to the materiality of voice(s) is inextricably bound up with embodied experiences of social subjects. Affective listening creates an auditory experience, establishing a direct link between worldly experiences of documentary subjects and corporeal memories. In both documentaries, listening to multiple voices requires attention to bodily expressions and sensations. The emphasis on corporeal expressions incorporates a multiplicity of affect conveyed through vocal conventions of documentary such as the voice-over and the interview. Consistent with the two documentaries, affective listening emphasizes a multiplicity of affect, a multiplicity that is ingrained corporeal memories. ii Dedication Dedicated to my mother, Sevim Sahin iii Vita 2013 (May).....................................................B.A. Radio, Television, and Film, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey 2013 (June).....................................................B.A. Political Science, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey 2017 to present ...............................................M.A. Film Studies, The Ohio State University Fields of Study Major Field: Film Studies iv Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Dedication .......................................................................................................................... iii Vita ..................................................................................................................................... iv Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Listening to Corporeal Memories in Cameraperson ........................................ 5 Chapter 3: Listening to Fluid Voices in Stories We Tell .................................................. 17 Chapter 4: Conclusion....................................................................................................... 32 References ......................................................................................................................... 35 v Chapter 1: Introduction “When he was six years old, Stravinsky listened to a mute peasant who produced unusual sounds with his arms, which the future musician tried to reproduce: he was looking for a different voice, one more or less vocal than the one comes from the mouth; another sound for another sense than the one that is spoken.”1 “… a text where we can hear the grain of the throat, the patina of consonants, the voluptuousness of vowels, a whole carnal stereophony: the articulation of the body, of the tongue, not that of meaning, of language.”2 Voice has remained central to documentary studies, but it has been examined in relation to a dominant paradigm. The category of voice, according to several documentary scholars, including Pooja Rangan, has been studied as a useful tool, vehicle, or metaphor for conveying the meaning of a given film and ensuring documentary’s truth claim.3 Considering voice as a metaphor has its roots in Bill Nichols’ seminal essay, “The Voice of Documentary.” In this essay, Nichols draws a distinction between the voice of the text as a whole and its components emerging from interview, dialogue, and voice- over commentary. Nichols argues that “we may think we hear history or reality speaking 1 Jean-Luc Nancy, Listening, trans. Charlotte Mandell (New York: Fordham University Press, 2007), 7. 2 Roland Barthes, The Pleasure of the Text, trans. Richard Miller (New York: Hill and Wang, 1975), 66-67. 3 Pooja Rangan, “Audibilities: Voice and Listening in the Penumbra of Documentary: An Introduction,” Discourse 39, no. 3 (Fall 2017): 280. See also: Annabelle Honess Roe and Maria Pramaggiore, “Introduction: Documentary’s Vocal Projections,” In Vocal Projections: Voices in Documentary (New York & London: Bloomsbury, 2019), 2. 1 to us through a film, but what we actually hear is the voice of the text.”4 Nichols explains what the voice of the text means: it “conveys to us a sense of a text’s social point of view, of how it is speaking to us and how it is organizing the materials it is presenting to us.”5 In conjunction with visual metaphor, Nichols proposes that a documentary consists of a wide range of voices, all of which “come to function as signs; they bear meaning, though the meaning is not really inherent in them but rather conferred upon them by their function within the text.”6 Within this conventional view, the voice as a useful vehicle prioritizes a coherent and comprehensible message of the text delivered through vocal conventions of documentary such as the voice-over and the interview. Nichols’ meaning- oriented approach ends up with a rigid formula: the more-meaning centered the voices become, the less there is to hear. In other words, Nichols’ theoretical framework privileges the textual message conveyed through speech acts of documentary subjects. Other documentary scholars have, however, recently challenged prevailing assumptions about the metaphorical use of voice. For example, Pooja Rangan investigates “the persistent logocentrism of voice” that “is conflated with meaning, and specifically, with logos: the referential content or message of the text.”7 Rangan explores how documentary’s meaning-oriented approach to voice “amplifies some features of reality and muffle others.”8 By contrast, Rangan conceptualizes the voice “as a form of 4 Bill Nichols, “The Voice of Documentary,” Film Quarterly 36, no.3 (Spring 1983): 20. 5 Ibid., 18. 6 Ibid., 20. 7 Pooja Rangan, “Audibilities: Voice and Listening in the Penumbra of Documentary: An Introduction,” 280. 8 Pooja Rangan, “Auditing the Call Centre Voice: Accented Speech and Listening in Sorali Gulati’s Nalini by Day, Nancy by Night (2005),” In Vocal Projections: Voices in Documentary, ed. Annabelle Honess Roe and Maria Pramaggiore, (New York & London: Bloomsbury, 2019), 33. 2 audibility” that “operates in ways that are both less literal than spoken words and more concrete than mere metaphor.”9 Similarly, Annabel Honess Roe and Maria Pramaggiore scrutinize “the sense-making imperatives of language that has dominated documentary studies” while simultaneously turning attention to “sonic capacities of human and non- human voices.”10 These current studies undermine the documentary’s discursive regime that gives a secondary status to the voice. Such recent studies, in parallel with the work of Mladen Dolar, escape the grid of approaching the voice as “a vanishing mediator” that “is the material support of bringing about meaning, yet it does not contribute to it itself.”11 These inquiries shift attention from visual referentiality to sonic materiality, stressing both phonic utterances as well as qualities of sound such as sighs and tones. This departure from metaphorical discourse towards the materiality of voice opens up new channels for rethinking the voice of documentary. The emphasis on the materiality of voice incorporates a new engagement, especially paying attention to the work of sound studies scholars. For example, Don Ihde highlights the importance of “auditory experience,” suggesting that listening to sounds creates “the richness of primary experience.”12 Likewise, according to Jean-Luc Nancy, the experience of listening goes beyond the meaning-oriented sense of the world, generating a new understanding of multiple senses.13 Consistent with these studies, listening to documentary subjects allows us to discover the relationship between the 9 Pooja Rangan, “Audibilities: Voice and Listening in the Penumbra of Documentary: An Introduction,” 280. 10 Annabelle Honess Roe and Maria Pramaggiore, “Introduction: Documentary’s Vocal Projections,” 1-2. 11 Mladen Dolar, A Voice and Nothing More (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2006), 15. 12 Don Ihde, Listening and Voice: Phenomenologies of Sound (Albany: University of New York Press, 2007), 13. 13 Jean-Luc Nancy, Listening, 36. 3 embodied dimension of voice and lived experiences. The embodied dimension of the voice bears the reminder that bodies speak to us in a documentary. Documentary listening, as Irina Leimbacher puts it, opens the way for “affective and existential contact.”14 This thesis sets out to listen to the plurality of affect ingrained in sonic events. If “the work of art is a bloc of sensations, a compound of percepts and affects,” as defined by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, listening to multiple voices plunges us into a multiplicity of affect.15 By proposing the term “affective listening,” the thesis rests on the assumption that Kirsten Johnson’s Cameraperson (2016) and Sarah Polley’s Stories We Tell (2012) can be understood through affective engagement. Rather than privileging a meaning-oriented engagement with the voice of documentary, affective
Recommended publications
  • Kennedy Matthew C 2016 Ma
    BLIND DATE MATTHEW KENNEDY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF FINE ARTS GRADUATE PROGRAM IN FILM YORK UNIVERISTY TORONTO, ONTARIO June 2016 © Matthew Kennedy, 2016 Abstract Blind Date is a documentary film about a young woman from rural China named Chun Cao Zhao who is pressured into marriage through a tradition known as “blind dating.” The film begins in Guangzhou, a sprawling metropolis in Southern China, where she has been living for the past ten years, and is just days away from returning home for her wedding. As she slowly says goodbye to city life, the life she wants to keep, she reveals to the camera her feelings toward her fiancé, her thoughts on the impending wedding and her own struggles to find a boyfriend. As the film follows her back home we intimately witness the sacrifices she is forced to make in order to appease her parents and the greater instrument of Chinese culture. The film examines and contrasts contemporary China with traditional China and displays the varying roles of each gender in both rural and urban settings. The film concludes with her arranged marriage and a short follow-up with her new husband six months after the wedding. ii Acknowledgements Throughout the entire process of making this film I have several people to which I owe a tremendous amount of gratitude. Firstly, to my supervisor Barbara Evans, making this film was a long journey and it could not have been done without her patience, encouragement and unwavering support.
    [Show full text]
  • Silent Films of Alfred Hitchcock
    The Hitchcock 9 Silent Films of Alfred Hitchcock Justin Mckinney Presented at the National Gallery of Art The Lodger (British Film Institute) and the American Film Institute Silver Theatre Alfred Hitchcock’s work in the British film industry during the silent film era has generally been overshadowed by his numerous Hollywood triumphs including Psycho (1960), Vertigo (1958), and Rebecca (1940). Part of the reason for the critical and public neglect of Hitchcock’s earliest works has been the generally poor quality of the surviving materials for these early films, ranging from Hitchcock’s directorial debut, The Pleasure Garden (1925), to his final silent film, Blackmail (1929). Due in part to the passage of over eighty years, and to the deterioration and frequent copying and duplication of prints, much of the surviving footage for these films has become damaged and offers only a dismal representation of what 1920s filmgoers would have experienced. In 2010, the British Film Institute (BFI) and the National Film Archive launched a unique restoration campaign called “Rescue the Hitchcock 9” that aimed to preserve and restore Hitchcock’s nine surviving silent films — The Pleasure Garden (1925), The Lodger (1926), Downhill (1927), Easy Virtue (1927), The Ring (1927), Champagne (1928), The Farmer’s Wife (1928), The Manxman (1929), and Blackmail (1929) — to their former glory (sadly The Mountain Eagle of 1926 remains lost). The BFI called on the general public to donate money to fund the restoration project, which, at a projected cost of £2 million, would be the largest restoration project ever conducted by the organization. Thanks to public support and a $275,000 dona- tion from Martin Scorsese’s The Film Foundation in conjunction with The Hollywood Foreign Press Association, the project was completed in 2012 to coincide with the London Olympics and Cultural Olympiad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of Anime As a Novel Animation Form, Referencing Selected Works by Hayao Miyazaki, Satoshi Kon and Mamoru Oshii
    The significance of anime as a novel animation form, referencing selected works by Hayao Miyazaki, Satoshi Kon and Mamoru Oshii Ywain Tomos submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Aberystwyth University Department of Theatre, Film and Television Studies, September 2013 DECLARATION This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Signed………………………………………………………(candidate) Date …………………………………………………. STATEMENT 1 This dissertation is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Signed………………………………………………………(candidate) Date …………………………………………………. STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my dissertation, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed………………………………………………………(candidate) Date …………………………………………………. 2 Acknowledgements I would to take this opportunity to sincerely thank my supervisors, Elin Haf Gruffydd Jones and Dr Dafydd Sills-Jones for all their help and support during this research study. Thanks are also due to my colleagues in the Department of Theatre, Film and Television Studies, Aberystwyth University for their friendship during my time at Aberystwyth. I would also like to thank Prof Josephine Berndt and Dr Sheuo Gan, Kyoto Seiko University, Kyoto for their valuable insights during my visit in 2011. In addition, I would like to express my thanks to the Coleg Cenedlaethol for the scholarship and the opportunity to develop research skills in the Welsh language. Finally I would like to thank my wife Tomoko for her support, patience and tolerance over the last four years – diolch o’r galon Tomoko, ありがとう 智子.
    [Show full text]
  • Productions in Ontario 2006
    2006 PRODUCTION IN ONTARIO with assistance from Ontario Media Development Corporation www.omdc.on.ca You belong here FEATURE FILMS – THEATRICAL ANIMAL 2 AWAY FROM HER Company: DGP Animal Productions Inc. Company: Pulling Focus Pictures ALL HAT Producers: Lewin Webb, Kate Harrison, Producer: Danny Iron, Simone Urdl, Company: No Cattle Productions Inc./ Wayne Thompson, Jennifer Weiss New Real Films David Mitchell, Erin Berry Director: Sarah Polley Producer: Jennifer Jonas Director: Ryan Combs Writers: Sarah Polley, Alice Munro Director: Leonard Farlinger Writer: Jacob Adams Production Manager: Ted Miller Writer: Brad Smith Production Manager: Dallas Dyer Production Designer: Kathleen Climie Line Producer/Production Manager: Production Designer: Andrew Berry Director of Photography: Luc Montpellier Avi Federgreen Director of Photography: Brendan Steacy Key Cast: Gordon Pinsent, Julie Christie, Production Designer: Matthew Davies Key Cast: Ving Rhames, K.C. Collins Olympia Dukakis Director of Photography: Paul Sarossy Shooting Dates: November – December 2006 Shooting Dates: February – April 2006 Key Cast: Luke Kirby, Rachael Leigh Cook, Lisa Ray A RAISIN IN THE SUN BLAZE Shooting Dates: October – November 2006 Company: ABC Television/Cliffwood Company: Barefoot Films GMBH Productions Producers: Til Schweiger, Shannon Mildon AMERICAN PIE PRESENTS: Producer: John Eckert Executive Producer: Tom Zickler THE NAKED MILE Executive Producers: Craig Zadan, Neil Meron Director: Reto Salimbeni Company: Universal Pictures Director: Kenny Leon Writer: Reto Salimbeni Producer: W.K. Border Writers: Lorraine Hansberry, Paris Qualles Line Producer/Production Manager: Director: Joe Nussbaum Production Manager: John Eckert Lena Cordina Writers: Adam Herz, Erik Lindsay Production Designer: Karen Bromley Production Designer: Matthew Davies Line Producer/Production Manager: Director of Photography: Ivan Strasburg Director of Photography: Paul Sarossy Byron Martin Key Cast: Sean Patrick Thomas, Key Cast: Til Schweiger Production Designer: Gordon Barnes Sean ‘P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929 by David Pierce September 2013
    The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929 by David Pierce September 2013 COUNCIL ON LIBRARY AND INFORMATION RESOURCES AND THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929 by David Pierce September 2013 Mr. Pierce has also created a da tabase of location information on the archival film holdings identified in the course of his research. See www.loc.gov/film. Commissioned for and sponsored by the National Film Preservation Board Council on Library and Information Resources and The Library of Congress Washington, D.C. The National Film Preservation Board The National Film Preservation Board was established at the Library of Congress by the National Film Preservation Act of 1988, and most recently reauthorized by the U.S. Congress in 2008. Among the provisions of the law is a mandate to “undertake studies and investigations of film preservation activities as needed, including the efficacy of new technologies, and recommend solutions to- im prove these practices.” More information about the National Film Preservation Board can be found at http://www.loc.gov/film/. ISBN 978-1-932326-39-0 CLIR Publication No. 158 Copublished by: Council on Library and Information Resources The Library of Congress 1707 L Street NW, Suite 650 and 101 Independence Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20036 Washington, DC 20540 Web site at http://www.clir.org Web site at http://www.loc.gov Additional copies are available for $30 each. Orders may be placed through CLIR’s Web site. This publication is also available online at no charge at http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub158.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ANIMATED TRAMP Charlie Chaplin's Influence on American
    THE ANIMATED TRAMP Charlie Chaplin’s Influence on American Animation By Nancy Beiman SLIDE 1: Joe Grant trading card of Chaplin and Mickey Mouse Charles Chaplin became an international star concurrently with the birth and development of the animated cartoon. His influence on the animation medium was immense and continues to this day. I will discuss how American character animators, past and present, have been inspired by Chaplin’s work. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND (SLIDE 2) Jeffrey Vance described Chaplin as “the pioneer subject of today’s modern multimedia marketing and merchandising tactics”, 1 “(SLIDE 3). Charlie Chaplin” comic strips began in 1915 and it was a short step from comic strips to animation. (SLIDE 4) One of two animated Chaplin series was produced by Otto Messmer and Pat Sullivan Studios in 1918-19. 2 Immediately after completing the Chaplin cartoons, (SLIDE 5) Otto Messmer created Felix the Cat who was, by 1925, the most popular animated character in America. Messmer, by his own admission, based Felix’s timing and distinctive pantomime acting on Chaplin’s. 3 But no other animators of the time followed Messmer’s lead. (SLIDE 6) Animator Shamus Culhane wrote that “Right through the transition from silent films to sound cartoons none of the producers of animation paid the slightest attention to… improvements in the quality of live action comedy. Trapped by the belief that animated cartoons should be a kind of moving comic strip, all the producers, (including Walt Disney) continued to turn out films that consisted of a loose story line that supported a group of slapstick gags which were often only vaguely related to the plot….The most astonishing thing is that Walt Disney took so long to decide to break the narrow confines of slapstick, because for several decades Chaplin, Lloyd and Keaton had demonstrated the superiority of good pantomime.” 4 1 Jeffrey Vance, CHAPLIN: GENIUS OF THE CINEMA, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconfiguring Home Movies in Experimental Cinema Kelsey Haas a Thesis in the Mel Hoppenheim School of Cinema
    Inherited Images: Reconfiguring Home Movies in Experimental Cinema Kelsey Haas A Thesis in The Mel Hoppenheim School of Cinema Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Masters of Art (Film Studies) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada July 2013 © Kelsey Haas, 2013 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Kelsey Haas Entitled: Inherited Images: Reconfiguring Home Movies in Experimental Cinema and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (Film Studies) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: ______________________________________ Chair Daniel Cross ______________________________________ Examiner Peter Rist ______________________________________ Examiner Rick Hancox ______________________________________ Supervisor Catherine Russell Approved by ______________________________________________________ Luca Caminati Graduate Program Director ______________________________________________________ Catherine Wild Dean of the Faculty of Fine Arts Date ______________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Inherited Images: Reconfiguring Home Movies in Experimental Cinema Kelsey Haas This thesis examines a subset of contemporary experimental filmmakers who incorporate their own home movies into their films and videos. Close analysis of Helen Hill’s Mouseholes (1999), Richard Fung’s Sea in the Blood (2000), Philip Hoffman’s What these Ashes Wanted (2001), and Jay Rosenblatt’s Phantom Limb (2005) reveals tensions between the private and public functions of home movies as well as key differences between the reconfigurations of home movies and the appropriation of found footage. When experimental filmmakers use home movies, it is often a means of confronting issues of memory; also, the filmmakers most often strive to preserve the home movies because of their personal connection to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Drawn to Sound
    Introduction ix About the Authors Rebecca Coyle teaches in the Media Program at Southern Cross University, Australia, and has edited two anthologies on Australian cinema soundtracks, Screen Scores (1998) and Reel Tracks (2005). She is currently researching film music production within an Australian Research Council funded project, is Research Director for the School of Arts and Social Sciences, and has recently edited a special issue of Animation Journal (published 2009). Jon Fitzgerald teaches in the contemporary music programme at Southern Cross University, Australia. He has previously written on a variety of musical and screen sound topics and he is the author of Popular Music Theory and Musicianship (1999/2003). He is also an experienced performer and composer. Daniel Goldmark is Associate Professor of music at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio. He is the series editor of the Oxford Music/Media Series, and is the author and/or editor of several books on animation, film, and music, including Tunes for ’Toons: Music and the Hollywood Cartoon (2005). Janet K. HalfJanet Halfyaryaryarddd is Director of Undergraduate Studies at Birmingham City University Conservatoire. Her publications include Danny Elfman’s Batman: A Film Score Guide (2004), an edited volume on Luciano Berio’s Sequenzas (2007), and a wide range of essays on music in film and cult televison. Philip Haywarddd is Director of Research Training at Southern Cross University, Aus- tralia and an adjunct professor in the Department of Media, Music and Cultural Studies at Macquarie University, Sydney. His previous screen sound books include Off the Planet: Music, Sound and Science Fiction Cinema (2005) and Terror Tracks: Music, Sound and Horror Cinema (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Film Reference Guide
    REFERENCE GUIDE THIS LIST IS FOR YOUR REFERENCE ONLY. WE CANNOT PROVIDE DVDs OF THESE FILMS, AS THEY ARE NOT PART OF OUR OFFICIAL PROGRAMME. HOWEVER, WE HOPE YOU’LL EXPLORE THESE PAGES AND CHECK THEM OUT ON YOUR OWN. DRAMA 1:54 AVOIR 16 ANS / TO BE SIXTEEN 2016 / Director-Writer: Yan England / 106 min / 1979 / Director: Jean Pierre Lefebvre / Writers: Claude French / 14A Paquette, Jean Pierre Lefebvre / 125 min / French / NR Tim (Antoine Olivier Pilon) is a smart and athletic 16-year- An austere and moving study of youthful dissent and old dealing with personal tragedy and a school bully in this institutional repression told from the point of view of a honest coming-of-age sports movie from actor-turned- rebellious 16-year-old (Yves Benoît). filmmaker England. Also starring Sophie Nélisse. BACKROADS (BEARWALKER) 1:54 ACROSS THE LINE 2000 / Director-Writer: Shirley Cheechoo / 83 min / 2016 / Director: Director X / Writer: Floyd Kane / 87 min / English / NR English / 14A On a fictional Canadian reserve, a mysterious evil known as A hockey player in Atlantic Canada considers going pro, but “the Bearwalker” begins stalking the community. Meanwhile, the colour of his skin and the racial strife in his community police prejudice and racial injustice strike fear in the hearts become a sticking point for his hopes and dreams. Starring of four sisters. Stephan James, Sarah Jeffery and Shamier Anderson. BEEBA BOYS ACT OF THE HEART 2015 / Director-Writer: Deepa Mehta / 103 min / 1970 / Director-Writer: Paul Almond / 103 min / English / 14A English / PG Gang violence and a maelstrom of crime rock Vancouver ADORATION A deeply religious woman’s piety is tested when a in this flashy, dangerous thriller about the Indo-Canadian charismatic Augustinian monk becomes the guest underworld.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGHLIGHTS … They Have Created a Public Event You Could No More Cancel Than You Could Cancel Valentine’S Day
    2018HIGHLIGHTS … they have created a public event you could no more cancel than you could cancel Valentine’s Day. — Kate Taylor, The Globe and Mail Contents 1 INTRODUCTION NCFD by the numbers • Spotlight on Women • Trailblazers 12 SCREENING EVENTS Interactive Google map • Enhanced events • International events • 2018 communities • RCtv 26 SCREENING PARTNER RESOURCES 30 ONLINE, ON-AIR AND IN-THE-AIR PROGRAMMING 36 BUZZ Promotional video • Media coverage highlights • Social media highlights • Website highlights • Media partnerships 46 TESTIMONIALS 50 SUPPORT REEL CANADA Board of Directors and Advisory Committee • Our Sponsors • Our Partners Introduction “… they have, in five short years, created a public event you could The way Canadians embraced our spotlight on women also showed no more cancel than you could cancel Valentine’s Day.” us that Canadians are not only hungry for homegrown stories, but – Kate Taylor, The Globe and Mail are deeply interested in hearing underrepresented voices, and celebrating them. When the article quoted above was published, that’s when we knew. We don’t expect you, Dear Reader, to take in every detail of this report. But we hope you will browse and enjoy some of the nuggets We knew there was a huge appetite for a cultural celebration that — the individual testimonials, the range of screening venues (and allows us to embrace our own stories, and we knew that Canadians countries!) and the ways in which screening partners made the day are beginning to think of it as a national institution! their own. It’s not very Canadian of us to toot our own horn, but we’re Reflecting on the fifth annual NCFD brings us to one conclusion: incredibly proud of the way National Canadian Film Day (NCFD) celebrating Canada by watching great Canadian films truly matters has grown over the past five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Culture in Transition
    FILM CULTURE IN TRANSITION Exhibiting Cinema in Contemporary Art ERIKA BALSOM Amsterdam University Press Exhibiting Cinema in Contemporary Art Exhibiting Cinema in Contemporary Art Erika Balsom This book is published in print and online through the online OAPEN library (www.oapen.org) OAPEN (Open Access Publishing in European Networks) is a collaborative in- itiative to develop and implement a sustainable Open Access publication model for academic books in the Humanities and Social Sciences. The OAPEN Library aims to improve the visibility and usability of high quality academic research by aggregating peer reviewed Open Access publications from across Europe. Sections of chapter one have previously appeared as a part of “Screening Rooms: The Movie Theatre in/and the Gallery,” in Public: Art/Culture/Ideas (), -. Sections of chapter two have previously appeared as “A Cinema in the Gallery, A Cinema in Ruins,” Screen : (December ), -. Cover illustration (front): Pierre Bismuth, Following the Right Hand of Louise Brooks in Beauty Contest, . Marker pen on Plexiglas with c-print, x inches. Courtesy of the artist and Team Gallery, New York. Cover illustration (back): Simon Starling, Wilhelm Noack oHG, . Installation view at neugerriemschneider, Berlin, . Photo: Jens Ziehe, courtesy of the artist, neugerriemschneider, Berlin, and Casey Kaplan, New York. Cover design: Kok Korpershoek, Amsterdam Lay-out: JAPES, Amsterdam isbn e-isbn (pdf) e-isbn (ePub) nur / © E. Balsom / Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Journey to the Academy Awards: an Investigation of Oscar-Shortlisted and Nominated Documentaries (2014-2016) PRELIMINARY KEY
    Journey to the Academy Awards: An Investigation of Oscar-Shortlisted and Nominated Documentaries (2014-2016) PRELIMINARY KEY FINDINGS By Caty Borum Chattoo, Co-Director, Center for Media & Social Impact American University School of Communication | Washington, D.C. February 2016 OVERVIEW For a documentary filmmaker, being recognized by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences for an Oscar nomination in the Best Documentary Feature category is often the pinnacle moment in a career. Beyond the celebratory achievement, the acknowledgment can open up doors for funding and opportunities for next films and career opportunities. The formal recognition happens in three phases: It begins in December with the Academy’s announcement of a shortlist—15 films that advance to a formal nomination for the Academy’s Best Documentary Feature Award. Then, in mid-January, the final list of five official nominations is announced. Finally, at the end of February each year, the one winner is announced at the Academy Awards ceremony. Beyond a film’s narrative and technical prowess, the marketing campaigns that help a documentary make it to the shortlist and then the final nomination list are increasingly expensive and insular, from advertisements in entertainment trade outlets to lavish events to build buzz among Academy members and industry influencers. What does it take for a documentary film and its director and producer to make it to the top—the Oscars shortlist, the nomination and the win? Which film directors are recognized—in terms of race and gender?
    [Show full text]