DOCSLIB.ORG

Uncas Leap Falls: a Convergence of Cultures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uncas Leap Falls: a Convergence of Cultures Uncas Leap Falls: A Convergence of Cultures Site Feasibility Study August 29, 2012 This page intentionally left blank Uncas Leap Falls: A Convergence of Cultures Prepared for the City of Norwich & The Mohegan Tribe August 29, 2012 Study Team: Goderre & Associates, LLC with Economic Stewardship, Inc. Hutton Associates, Inc. Gibble Norden Champion Brown Consulting Engineers, Inc. Nelson Edwards Company Architects, LLC Archeological and Historic Services, Inc. 1492: Columbus arrives in the Americas Front cover illustration of Uncas provided by the Mohegan Tribe 1598: Uncas is born Historical Timeline 1620: Pilgrims arrive 1634 – 1638: Pequot War 1654: John Casor is first legally recognized slave in the US 1659: Norwich founded 1675 – 1678: King Philip’s War 1683: Uncas’ death 1741: Benedict Arnold is born 1754: French Indian War begins 1763: French Indian War ends 1775: American Revolutionary War begins 1776: Signing of the Declaration of Independence 1783: American Revolutionary War ends 1863: President Lincoln signs the Emancipation Proclamation 2012: Norwich Casts the Freedom Bell Uncas Leap Falls: A Convergence of Cultures Site Feasibility Study August 29, 2012 2 Uncas Leap Falls: A Convergence of Cultures TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Overview.............................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Cultures Converge ................................................................................................................ 7 The Nine Mile Square ................................................................................................................. 8 The Royal Mohegan Burial Ground ............................................................................................. 9 1.3 An Integrated Approach ..................................................................................................... 10 1.4 Opportunity ....................................................................................................................... 12 2. Uncas Leap Falls: Existing Conditions ................................................................................ 14 2.1 Site Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Preliminary Building Structural Review .............................................................................. 18 2.3 Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (dated 2002) ........................................................ 20 2.4 Adjacent Resource Opportunities ....................................................................................... 20 2.5 Regional and Local Site Access........................................................................................... 22 3. Regional Integration ........................................................................................................ 23 3.1 Leadership ......................................................................................................................... 23 3.2 An Economic Hub............................................................................................................... 24 3.3 The City of Norwich............................................................................................................ 24 A Resurgence of Economic Growth .......................................................................................... 24 Community Strength ............................................................................................................... 27 3.4 Tourism as a Key Strategy .................................................................................................. 28 Mystic Country and the Last Green Valley ................................................................................ 28 Future Opportunities ................................................................................................................ 28 Uncas Leap Falls: A Convergence of Cultures 3 4. Cultural Heritage Tourism: An Economic Catalyst ............................................................... 30 4.1 What is Cultural Heritage Tourism? .................................................................................... 30 4.2 Investing in Heritage Tourism ............................................................................................ 30 4.3 The Role of Grass-roots Organizations ............................................................................... 33 4.4 Marketing Heritage Tourism .............................................................................................. 35 5. Recommendations ..........................................................................................................36 5.1 Stabilize and Protect the Granite Building .......................................................................... 36 5.2 Establish a Management Structure for Uncas Leap Falls .................................................... 36 5.3 Reestablish Norwich's Approach to Tourism ...................................................................... 37 5.4 Pursue Funding Opportunities ........................................................................................... 38 5.5 Amend the City's Plan of Conservation and Development .................................................. 38 5.6 Protect the Royal Mohegan Burial Grounds ........................................................................ 38 5.7 Perform a National Parks Service Public Design Charrette ................................................. 39 5.8 Conduct a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment ............................................................ 40 5.9 Interpret the Mohegan Tribe's and Norwich's Story............................................................ 40 5.10 Create Partnerships with the Last Green Valley and Regional Entities ................................ 41 5.11 Understand Uncas Leap Fall's Economic Market Potential ................................................. 42 5.12 Define a Vision for Uncas Leap Falls ................................................................................... 42 5.13 Preserve the Granite Building ............................................................................................. 45 5.14 Pursue Granite Building National Register of Historic Place Designation & National Landmark(s) Designation for Uncas Leap Falls and Other Culturally Significant Sites ......... 46 5.15 Reuse Portions of the Brick Building ................................................................................... 46 5.16 Promote the Use of Hydroelectric Power ........................................................................... 47 5.17 Determine Site Development Requirements ...................................................................... 47 5.18 Direct Visitors into Norwich and Uncas Leap Falls; Enhance City Wayfinding ..................... 49 5.19 Market and Brand Uncas Leap Falls & Norwich .................................................................. 51 5.20 Create and Enhance Heritage Walk and Create New Linkages ........................................... 52 6. Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 53 Appendix A: Interviewee Listing Appendix B: The Rise of a Region: The Mohegans, Sachem Uncas and the Industrial Revolution Appendix C: Structural Engineering Report Appendix D: Charrette Agenda Appendix E: Phase 1 ESA, 2002 Appendix F: Funding Resources 4 Uncas Leap Falls: A Convergence of Cultures 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview In 2011, the City of Norwich took title through foreclosure of ‘Uncas Leap Falls’, a one acre parcel located at 196-200 Yantic Street in Norwich, CT. Previously referred to as Indian Leap, Uncas Leap Falls (the Site) overlooks the Yantic River and majestic Yantic Falls. The Site consists of a two-story, 9,000SF granite mill building constructed c. 1830, a one-story brick mill building constructed in the early 1900's, a gravel parking area and limited green space. The site has been utilized for the manufacturing of goods ranging from paper in the early 1800's to most recently, helmet mounted mirrors for bicyclists. Currently, the buildings are not being utilized. The roofs of each building are partially collapsed and the granite building's easterly wall has a high probability of failure, creating a life safety concern because of its close proximity to a residential apartment building. However, with structural improvements the entire granite building and a portion of the brick building have high potential for reuse. The conditions of each building are discussed in later sections of this document. The Granite Mill structure is a unique building that represents one of the first mill styles, designs and structural engineering. Interior and exterior, the building possesses several aesthetic values. During the structural review, the building was found to be in fair condition and can be rehabilitated for adaptive reuse. However, the easterly wall has the potential for collapse, endangering the building's adaptive reuse and presenting a life safety concern because of its close proximity to an apartment complex located 20' east. It is strongly recommended that the wall be immediately secured to address life-safety issues and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4: Cultural and Historic Resources
    Ocean Special Area Management Plan Chapter 4: Cultural and Historic Resources Table of Contents 400 Introduction ......................................................................................................................3 410 Historic Contexts and Cultural Landscapes of the Ocean SAMP Area .......................4 410.1 Pre-Contact Geological History............................................................................5 410.2 Narragansett Tribal History.................................................................................6 410.3 European Exploration and Colonial Settlement Landscape Context .............16 410.4 Post-Colonial Cultural Landscape Context.......................................................18 410.5 Military Landscape Context ...............................................................................21 410.6 Fisheries Landscape Context ..............................................................................31 410.6.1 Rhode Island Fisheries.............................................................................31 410.6.2 Fishing and Subsistence on Block Island.................................................33 410.6.3 Historic Shipwrecks of Fishing Vessels ..................................................34 410.6.4 Historic Harbor Features..........................................................................35 410.7 Marine Transportation and Commercial Landscape Context........................35 410.8 Recreation and Tourism Landscape Context....................................................38
    [Show full text]
  • Mashantucket Pequot Tribe V. Town of Ledyard: the Preemption of State Taxes Under Bracker, the Indian Trader Statutes, and the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Comment
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenCommons at University of Connecticut University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Connecticut Law Review School of Law 2014 Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. Town of Ledyard: The Preemption of State Taxes under Bracker, the Indian Trader Statutes, and the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Comment Edward A. Lowe Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review Recommended Citation Lowe, Edward A., "Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. Town of Ledyard: The Preemption of State Taxes under Bracker, the Indian Trader Statutes, and the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Comment" (2014). Connecticut Law Review. 267. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review/267 CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 47 NOVEMBER 2014 NUMBER 1 Comment MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBE V. TOWN OF LEDYARD: THE PREEMPTION OF STATE TAXES UNDER BRACKER, THE INDIAN TRADER STATUTES, AND THE INDIAN GAMING REGULATORY ACT EDWARD A. LOWE The Indian Tribes of the United States occupy an often ambiguous place in our legal system, and nowhere is that ambiguity more pronounced than in the realm of state taxation. States are, for the most part, preempted from taxing the Indian Tribes, but something unique happens when the state attempts to levy a tax on non-Indian vendors employed by a Tribe for work on a reservation. The state certainly has a significant justification for imposing its tax on non-Indians, but at what point does the non-Indian vendor’s relationship with the Tribe impede the state’s right to tax? What happens when the taxed activity is a sale to the Tribe? And what does it mean when the taxed activity has connections to Indian Gaming? This Comment explores three preemption standards as they were interpreted by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in a case between the State of Connecticut and the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe.
    [Show full text]
  • Pachaug – the River Be Dammed
    Image courtesy of www.glsweetnam.com This workshop was sponsored in part by Millennium Power through The Last Green Valley and in partnership will the Eastern Connecticut Conservation District. The TRBP Floating Workshop was hosted by Old Sturbridge Village Thames River Basin Partnership Our Mission The Thames River Basin • Protect the region's agricultural Partnership is a voluntary, and natural areas being threatened cooperative effort to share by land use changes. organizational resources and to develop a regional • Protect ground and surface water approach to natural quantity and quality being threatened and degraded by resource protection. The contamination. partnership grew out of locally led workshops held • Protect the region's biodiversity. by the region's Soil and Water Conservation • Improve the coastal zone resource Districts. conditions. • Improve the coastal zone resource conditions Who are the Thames River Basin Partners? Quinebaug is derived from a Native American term that translates to mean “long, slow-moving river”. Our workshop began with an optional morning paddle on the a section of the Quinebaug River National Canoe Trail from Lake Siog to the Brimfield Dam, sponsored by The Last Green Valley. This 4 mile paddle has little current, extensive wildlife habitat, three picnic landings and no portages. It is the perfect three- hour outing for beginning paddlers and families. Momma Kingbird guards her nest from the floating intruders. Water-view of the 2011 tornado damaged area. Some people enjoyed more than just floating. TRBP Floating Workshop XV was held at Old Sturbridge Village. Quinebaug River Stats: • About 76 miles long, with 28 miles in MA.
    [Show full text]
  • A R I S T O N Talk March 13, 2012 Introduction Indo-European
    A r i s t o n Talk March 13, 2012 Bryan A. Bentz [The following are the speaker’s notes] Introduction I’m going to talk about two language families, one that is to some extent familiar, one that is very likely not. The examples in the familiar context, that of the Indo-European family of languages, may help make the examples in the Algonquian family a bit clearer. My focus in within the second family will be local indian languages. I’m not sure what I should title the talk - since I’m going to start with Sanskrit and end with Pequot/Mohegan, I thought “Indian Languages”, with deliberate ambiguity, might fit. I decided to start with Indo-European because it’s interesting in its own right, and the material will be to some extent familiar. My purpose is really to lay the foundation for discussion of the Algonquian languages, by showing the sorts of analysis that may be done on a language family, and what may be learned, so I’m going to be relatively brief when it comes to Indo-European. It will be easier to see patterns and understand how holes may be filled in when discussing more familiar languages. Most people are aware that Latin is the root of the Romance languages (French, Spanish, Romanian, Italian, etc.), which evolved in geographically separate areas after the fall of the Roman Empire. Similarly, Indo-European is a common root to a much wider array of languages, including Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, and German – indeed most European, Indian, and Iranian languages are rooted in it.
    [Show full text]
  • (King Philip's War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial
    Connecticut Unscathed: Victory in The Great Narragansett War (King Philip’s War), 1675-1676 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Major Jason W. Warren, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin Jr., Advisor Alan Gallay, Kristen Gremillion Peter Mansoor, Geoffrey Parker Copyright by Jason W. Warren 2011 Abstract King Philip’s War (1675-1676) was one of the bloodiest per capita in American history. Although hostile native groups damaged much of New England, Connecticut emerged unscathed from the conflict. Connecticut’s role has been obscured by historians’ focus on the disasters in the other colonies as well as a misplaced emphasis on “King Philip,” a chief sachem of the Wampanoag groups. Although Philip formed the initial hostile coalition and served as an important leader, he was later overshadowed by other sachems of stronger native groups such as the Narragansetts. Viewing the conflict through the lens of a ‘Great Narragansett War’ brings Connecticut’s role more clearly into focus, and indeed enables a more accurate narrative for the conflict. Connecticut achieved success where other colonies failed by establishing a policy of moderation towards the native groups living within its borders. This relationship set the stage for successful military operations. Local native groups, whether allied or neutral did not assist hostile Indians, denying them the critical intelligence necessary to coordinate attacks on Connecticut towns. The English colonists convinced allied Mohegan, Pequot, and Western Niantic warriors to support their military operations, giving Connecticut forces a decisive advantage in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • A Souvenir of Massachusetts Legislators
    31<.*JI'il^L^\ ^S^lJ^HSI '^^^^mt^m':m:^^^'^^%^fm^.M^^. Wi:M:. Ctet^ 'Wm M^M^ m"^ ^p^^ 'i® i/v».«i lit *** t*/S - ®t- r^#fe ^^teii .^<;^ -r'.MAV-'iTfkj ^.ri91^!^ , ii A SOUVENIR iTla60ac§U0e^ts Begt0fatot0 1898. I'OLUME I'll. Issued Annually I A . M . B R I D G M A N STOUGHTON, MASS. Copyrighted iS^S hy A. M. BRIDGMAN, Half-tone and Text Print by Stoughton Record Print, Stoughton . HaH-tones from Photos, from Elmer Chickering, the "Royal Photographer," 21 West Street, F. Half-tones, Aznive Engraving Co., 375 Washington Street, Boston. PREFACE. The Editor of the Souvenir has had occasion to remark in previous editions that each Legislature has some peculiar characteristic to distinguish it from all others It fell to the lot of the Legislature of 1898, for the first time in over 30 years, or the usuil span of a generation, to make war preparations and to discuss war measures. The breaking out of the war with Spain found our Legislature rjady to do its part promptly and patriotically. With absolute unanimity and no more delay than was necessary for the making of the proper motions and the sig- nature of the bill by Governor Wolcott, the whole transaction occupying less than half an hour, the war appropriation of half a million dollars was voted ; and in the Senate the enactment of the measure was greeted with three cheers. No partisan discussion but patriotic action marked every measure of similar import. But this Souvenir is not intended as a record of what was done.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of the Fishery Resources of the Thames River Watershed, Connecticut Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn College of Agriculture, Health and Natural Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station Resources 5-1975 An Evaluation of the Fishery Resources of the Thames River Watershed, Connecticut Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/saes Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Biodiversity Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, "An Evaluation of the Fishery Resources of the Thames River Watershed, Connecticut" (1975). Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station. 50. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/saes/50 Bulletin 435, May '975 3 7 An Evaluation of the Fishery Resources of the Thames River Watershed, Connecticut Edited by Richard L. Hames Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection STORRS AGRICULTURA L EXPERIMENT STATION COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RE SOURCES THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT, ST ORRS. CONNECTICUT 06268 • EDITOR'S FOREWORD The Thames River system is located in a section of southern New England that has escaped the extreme alterations of the industrial revolution and later urbanization. It has, unfortunately, suffered the consequences of dam construction causing the disappearance of anadromous fish, and industrial and domestic pollution which degraded water quality in some areas to a marginal fisheries habitat. Enough unspoiled areas are left, unaltered by dams, pollution and the developer, to reward the knowledgeable observer with a glimpse of what it was and what it could be again. As part of the program for restoration of anadromous fish to the Thames River system, it was decided to make a general biological survey of the system to document present conditions .
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving Connecticut's Bridges Report Appendix
    Preserving Connecticut's Bridges Report Appendix - September 2018 Year Open/Posted/Cl Rank Town Facility Carried Features Intersected Location Lanes ADT Deck Superstructure Substructure Built osed Hartford County Ranked by Lowest Score 1 Bloomfield ROUTE 189 WASH BROOK 0.4 MILE NORTH OF RTE 178 1916 2 9,800 Open 6 2 7 2 South Windsor MAIN STREET PODUNK RIVER 0.5 MILES SOUTH OF I-291 1907 2 1,510 Posted 5 3 6 3 Bloomfield ROUTE 178 BEAMAN BROOK 1.2 MI EAST OF ROUTE 189 1915 2 12,000 Open 6 3 7 4 Bristol MELLEN STREET PEQUABUCK RIVER 300 FT SOUTH OF ROUTE 72 1956 2 2,920 Open 3 6 7 5 Southington SPRING STREET QUINNIPIAC RIVER 0.6 MI W. OF ROUTE 10 1960 2 3,866 Open 3 7 6 6 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 MARKET STREET & I-91 NB EAST END I-91 & I-84 INT 1961 4 125,700 Open 5 4 4 7 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 EB AMTRAK;LOCAL RDS;PARKING EASTBOUND 1965 3 66,450 Open 6 4 4 8 Hartford INTERSTATE-91 NB PARK RIVER & CSO RR AT EXIT 29A 1964 2 48,200 Open 5 4 4 9 New Britain SR 555 (WEST MAIN PAN AM SOUTHERN RAILROAD 0.4 MILE EAST OF RTE 372 1930 3 10,600 Open 4 5 4 10 West Hartford NORTH MAIN STREET WEST BRANCH TROUT BROOK 0.3 MILE NORTH OF FERN ST 1901 4 10,280 Open N 4 4 11 Manchester HARTFORD ROAD SOUTH FORK HOCKANUM RIV 2000 FT EAST OF SR 502 1875 2 5,610 Open N 4 4 12 Avon OLD FARMS ROAD FARMINGTON RIVER 500 FEET WEST OF ROUTE 10 1950 2 4,999 Open 4 4 6 13 Marlborough JONES HOLLOW ROAD BLACKLEDGE RIVER 3.6 MILES NORTH OF RTE 66 1929 2 1,255 Open 5 4 4 14 Enfield SOUTH RIVER STREET FRESHWATER BROOK 50 FT N OF ASNUNTUCK ST 1920 2 1,016 Open 5 4 4 15 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 EB BROAD ST, I-84 RAMP 191 1.17 MI S OF JCT US 44 WB 1966 3 71,450 Open 6 4 5 16 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 EAST NEW PARK AV,AMTRAK,SR504 NEW PARK AV,AMTRAK,SR504 1967 3 69,000 Open 6 4 5 17 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 WB AMTRAK;LOCAL RDS;PARKING .82 MI N OF JCT SR 504 SB 1965 4 66,150 Open 6 4 5 18 Hartford I-91 SB & TR 835 CONNECTICUT SOUTHERN RR AT EXIT 29A 1958 5 46,450 Open 6 5 4 19 Hartford SR 530 -AIRPORT RD ROUTE 15 422 FT E OF I-91 1964 5 27,200 Open 5 6 4 20 Bristol MEMORIAL BLVD.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Native Americans in Essex, Connecticut
    A Brief History of Native Americans in Essex, Connecticut by Verena Harfst, Essex Table of Contents Special Thanks and an Appeal to the Community 3 - 4 Introduction 5 The Paleo-Indian Period 6 - 7 The Archaic Period 7 - 10 The Woodland Period 11 – 12 Algonquians Settle Connecticut 12 - 14 Thousands of Years of Native American Presence in Essex 15 - 19 Native American Life in the Essex Area Shortly Before European Arrival 19 - 23 Arrival of the Dutch and the English 23 - 25 Conflict and Defeat 25 - 28 The Fate of the Nihantic 28 - 31 Postscript 31 Footnotes 31 - 37 2 Special Thanks and an Appeal to the Community This article contributes to an ongoing project of the Essex Historical Society (EHS) and the Essex Land Trust to celebrate the history of the Falls River in south central Connecticut. This modest but lovely watercourse connects the three communities comprising the Town of Essex, wending its way through Ivoryton, Centerbrook and Essex Village, where it flows into North Cove and ultimately the main channel of the Connecticut River a few miles above Long Island Sound. Coined “Follow the Falls”, the project is being conducted largely by volunteers devoted to their beautiful town and committed to helping the Essex Historical Society and the Essex Land Trust achieve their missions. This article by a local resident focuses on the history of the Indigenous People of Essex. The article is based on interviews the author conducted with a number of archaeologists and historians as well as reviews of written materials readily accessible on the history of Native Americans in New England.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Chapter
    Ocean Special Area Management Plan Chapter 4: Cultural and Historic Resources Table of Contents 400 Introduction ......................................................................................................................3 410 Historic Contexts and Cultural Landscapes of the Ocean SAMP Area .......................4 410.1 Pre-Contact Geological History............................................................................5 410.2 Narragansett Tribal History.................................................................................6 410.3 European Exploration and Colonial Settlement Landscape Context .............16 410.4 Post-Colonial Cultural Landscape Context.......................................................18 410.5 Military Landscape Context ...............................................................................21 410.6 Fisheries Landscape Context ..............................................................................31 410.6.1 Rhode Island Fisheries.............................................................................31 410.6.2 Fishing and Subsistence on Block Island.................................................33 410.6.3 Historic Shipwrecks of Fishing Vessels ..................................................34 410.6.4 Historic Harbor Features..........................................................................35 410.7 Marine Transportation and Commercial Landscape Context ........................35 410.8 Recreation and Tourism Landscape Context....................................................38
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Watersheds
    Percent Impervious Surface Summaries for Watersheds CONNECTICUT WATERSHEDS Name Number Acres 1985 %IS 1990 %IS 1995 %IS 2002 %IS ABBEY BROOK 4204 4,927.62 2.32 2.64 2.76 3.02 ALLYN BROOK 4605 3,506.46 2.99 3.30 3.50 3.96 ANDRUS BROOK 6003 1,373.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.09 ANGUILLA BROOK 2101 7,891.33 3.13 3.50 3.78 4.29 ASH CREEK 7106 9,813.00 34.15 35.49 36.34 37.47 ASHAWAY RIVER 1003 3,283.88 3.89 4.17 4.41 4.96 ASPETUCK RIVER 7202 14,754.18 2.97 3.17 3.31 3.61 BALL POND BROOK 6402 4,850.50 3.98 4.67 4.87 5.10 BANTAM RIVER 6705 25,732.28 2.22 2.40 2.46 2.55 BARTLETT BROOK 3902 5,956.12 1.31 1.41 1.45 1.49 BASS BROOK 4401 6,659.35 19.10 20.97 21.72 22.77 BEACON HILL BROOK 6918 6,537.60 4.24 5.18 5.46 6.14 BEAVER BROOK 3802 5,008.24 1.13 1.22 1.24 1.27 BEAVER BROOK 3804 7,252.67 2.18 2.38 2.52 2.67 BEAVER BROOK 4803 5,343.77 0.88 0.93 0.94 0.95 BEAVER POND BROOK 6913 3,572.59 16.11 19.23 20.76 21.79 BELCHER BROOK 4601 5,305.22 6.74 8.05 8.39 9.36 BIGELOW BROOK 3203 18,734.99 1.40 1.46 1.51 1.54 BILLINGS BROOK 3605 3,790.12 1.33 1.48 1.51 1.56 BLACK HALL RIVER 4021 3,532.28 3.47 3.82 4.04 4.26 BLACKBERRY RIVER 6100 17,341.03 2.51 2.73 2.83 3.00 BLACKLEDGE RIVER 4707 16,680.11 2.82 3.02 3.16 3.34 BLACKWELL BROOK 3711 18,011.26 1.53 1.65 1.70 1.77 BLADENS RIVER 6919 6,874.43 4.70 5.57 5.79 6.32 BOG HOLLOW BROOK 6014 4,189.36 0.46 0.49 0.50 0.51 BOGGS POND BROOK 6602 4,184.91 7.22 7.78 8.41 8.89 BOOTH HILL BROOK 7104 3,257.81 8.54 9.36 10.02 10.55 BRANCH BROOK 6910 14,494.87 2.05 2.34 2.39 2.48 BRANFORD RIVER 5111 15,586.31 8.03 8.94 9.33 9.74
    [Show full text]
  • The Mohegan Tribal Government the Mohegan Tribe Is a Sovereign
    The Mohegan Tribal Government The Mohegan Tribe is a sovereign, federally recognized Indian nation. Its reservation is located on the Thames River near Uncasville, Connecticut. The Mohegan Nation exercises full civil jurisdiction and concurrent criminal jurisdiction over its lands. The Tribe is governed by a Tribal Constitution, which empowers a nine-member Tribal Council to serve as both the legislative and executive branch, and a seven-member Council of Elders which is responsible for judicial oversight and cultural integrity. The Chairman of the Tribal Council, currently Kevin Brown “Red Eagle,” serves as Chief Executive of the Tribe. The Tribal Council and Council of Elders serve four year, staggered terms. A Tribal Court system exists to adjudicate constitutional as well as civil issues. Other Tribal leaders include Chief Lynn “Mutáwi Mutáhash” (Many Hearts) Malerba, Medicine Woman and Tribal Historian Melissa Tantaquidgeon Zobel, Pipe Carriers Bruce “Two Dogs” Bozsum and Christopher Harris “Painted Turtle,” Firekeeper Jay Ihloff “Two Trees,” and Lodgekeeper Charlie Strickland “Two Bears.” The Tribal Government has numerous administrative departments, including Cultural and Community Programs, Education, Library and Archives, Gaming Commission, Health and Human Services, Housing Authority, Public Safety, Utility Authority, Land Preservation and Planning and Environmental Protection. Current enrollment of the Tribe stands at approximately 2,100 individuals, most of whom reside in Connecticut near ancestral Tribal lands. Tribal Government 2017 Page 1 of 2 Current Tribal Council Members: Kevin Brown "Red Eagle," Chairman James Gessner Jr., Vice Chairman Cheryl A. Todd, Recording Secretary Kathy Regan-Pyne, Corresponding Secretary Thayne D. Hutchins Jr., Treasurer Mark F. Brown, Ambassador William Quidgeon, Jr., Councilor Joseph William Smith, Councilor Sarah E.
    [Show full text]