Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2017; 5(3): 654-661

E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 A preliminary list of lepidopteran from JEZS 2017; 5(3): 654-661 © 2017 JEZS Palkot Wildlife Sanctuary, Jharkhand Received: 01-03-2017 Accepted: 02-04-2017

Navneet Singh Navneet Singh and Jalil Ahmad Zoological Survey of , Gangetic Plains Regional Centre, Abstract Sector-8, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Patna-800 026, Bihar, The present research paper deals with the preliminary data on the diversity of Lepidopteran insects of India Palkot WLS. The information is based on a survey tour conducted during October 11-13, 2015. Around 0 the Palkot three sites were selected for the collection. Two sites were selected on Gobarsilli (22 53.058N, 0 0 0 Jalil Ahmad 084 39.229E), and one site was selected on Kura Pahar (22 51.621 N, 084 38.123 E).The collection Zoological Survey of India, survey and identification yielded a total of 89 species of including 30 species of Gangetic Plains Regional Centre, under 26 genera and 59 species of under 42 genera. As far as Butterflies are concerned, Sector-8, Bahadurpur Housing with 64% of total reported Butterflies dominated the group whereas, in moths, Colony, Patna-800 026, Bihar, dominated with 73% of the collected species. India Keywords: Inventory, Lepidoptera, Jharkhand, Gumla, Palkot Wildlife Sanctuary

1. Introduction

The Palkot Wildlife Sanctuary falls within the districts of Gumla and Simdega of state of 0 0 0 0 [1] Jharkhand and lies between 22 45’N and 23 N longitude and 84 30’E to 84 45E latitude . The National Highway no. 23 crosses and divides the sanctuary between two parts. The sanctuary received its status in the year 1990 vide Govt. Notification no. 1168 dated 22.03.1990. The total geographical area of the sanctuary is 182.83 sq. Km[1].The geography of

Palkot WLS is unique by having several caves, cavities, crevice, dens, holes, and snags which forms a suitable habitat for wild . The sanctuary area is full of small hills and undulating land with intermittent plains in which habitation and agricultural land exist. Some of the hills are flat, others are with smooth curves and some having steep slopes. Plateau formation, locally known as ‘Pat’ is the most striking topographical feature of the track and is

found on almost all hills in smaller or larger extent. The plains are rice producing fields. Patches of the land are also covered with Sal forest. There is usually three climatic seasons: the cold weather, the hot and rains. The cold weather sets in early November and lasts until about end of February. The hot weather corresponds to the period between ends of March to June [2]. The rain breaks at about the end of June and continues till the end of September. The average

rainfall in Palkot Wildlife Sanctuary is about 1000 mm per year. The range of temperature varies according to the season during summer and it varies from 35– 40 degree whereas in winters it goes below 10 degree [2]. The forests of the sanctuary are classified according to the Champion and Seth [3]. The sanctuary comprises Northern tropical dry deciduous forest (Dry peninsular Sal - Type 5B/C), Northern dry mixed deciduous forest type 5B/C, Dry Sal scrub

type Ds. The key floral components of the sanctuary are Sal and its associates like Asan, [2] Gamhar, Salai, Piar, Amla, Mahua, Kusum, Mango etc . The sanctuary area and its surroundings are not so healthy in vertebrate population. As per the forest department census of 1993, number of major vertebrate species is as follows: Leopards(05), Langur (80), Rhesus Macaque(500), Elephant(6), Sloth Bear(150), Wild

Boar(240), Hyena(90), Wolf(50) and Jackal(200) besides number of Birds, Reptiles, [2] Amphibians, and Fishes .But, no data is available on the invertebrate diversity of Palkot WLS. The Zoological Survey of India, Gangetic Plains Regional Centre, Patna with the first Correspondence author as a leader of the party surveyed the sanctuary for the first time in October, 2015 for the Navneet Singh study of Lepidopterous fauna of the sanctuary. The Lepidopteran insects are among the best- Zoological Survey of India, Gangetic Plains Regional Centre, known insects, and are mainly recognized due to the body and wings covered with scales Sector-8, Bahadurpur Housing (modified and flattened hairs which give the butterflies and the moths their extraordinary Colony, Patna-800 026, Bihar, variety of colour patterns). Lepidopteran insects are broadly divided into Butterflies and India moths. ~ 654 ~ Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

The latter includes most of the Lepidopteran species (about long term monitoring programmes will help in the enrichment 88%) and are nocturnal and often drably coloured. Moths can of the information. be separated from Butterflies due to its various types of The list of the identified species of Butterflies and Moths is antennae but not clubbed, fat furry bodies and the sitting given in Table 1 and 2 respectively. For the common names posture, where adults sit by spreading wings. of Butterflies, Kehimkar [13] has been followed. The present study was undertaken with a broader objective to study the diversity of Lepidopteran insects from a 4. Acknowledgement geographical important area of Jharkhand, the Palkot Wildlife Authors are thankful to Dr. Kailash Chandra, Director, Sanctuary. Zoological Survey of India for their encouragement and all supports for this research work; to PCCF, Jharkhand; DFO, 2. Materials and Methods Palkot WLS; RFO, Palkot Wildlife Sanctuary and all the other The information is based on a survey tour conducted during forest staff of Palkot Wildlife sanctuary who helped a lot October 11-13, 2015. The collection of moths was made with during night collections. We are also thankful to Mr. Kuldip the help of vertical sheet light traps during night time. Das (Field Collector ZSI, Patna), and Mr. Prabhat Singh Butterflies were collected with the help of hand nets during (Motor Driver) for their assistance during survey tour. day time. The collected specimens were killed with the help of ethyl acetate vapours and processed as per standard Table 1: List of Butterflies techniques in Lepidopterology. Dry preservation is done in S. & Species Common Name fumigated ento-boxes and stored in the cabinets in No. Zoological Survey of India, GPRC, Patna. The identification Family- Nymphalidae is done with the help of relevant literature [4-6]. The classification followed here is given by Nieukerken et al. [7] 1 Acraea violae (Fabricius) Tawny Coster and Zahiri et al. [8]. 2 Ariadne merione (Cramer) Common Castor 3 Danaus chrysippus (Linnaeus) Plain Tiger 2.1 Study area 4 Danaus geneutia (Cramer) Striped Tiger Around the Palkot three sites were selected for the collection. 5 Euploea core (Cramer) Common Crow 0 Two sites were selected on Gobarsilli (22 53.058N, 6 nais (Forster) Baronet 0 084 39.229E), with light traps facing to opposite directions 7 Hypolimnas bolina (Linnaeus) Great Eggfly 0 and one site was selected on Kura Pahar (22 51.621 N, 8 Junonia iphita (Cramer) Chocolate Pansy 084038.123 E). Common Evening 9 Melanitis leda (Linnaeus) Brown 3. Results and Discussion Dark Brand Bush The present research paper deals with the preliminary data on 10 Mycalesis mineus (Linnaeus) Brown the diversity of Lepidopteran insects of Palkot WLS. The collection survey and identification yielded a total of 89 11 Neptis hylas (Linnaeus) Common Sailer species of Lepidoptera (30 species of butterflies under 26 12 Tirumala limniace (Cramer) Blue Tiger genera and 59 species of moths under 42 genera). As far as 13 Phalanta phalantha (Drury) Common Leopard butterflies are concerned, Nymphalidae with 64% of collected 14 Euthalia lubentina (Cramer) Gaudy Baron species dominated the group followed by 15 Polyura athamas (Drury) Common Nawab Papilionidae (16%), Pieridae (10%), (6%) and psaphon imna Indian Plain Tawny 16 Riodinidae (4%). In moths, Erebidae dominated with 73% of (Butler) Rajah collected moth species, followed by Sphingidae (10%), 17 Limenitis procris (Cramer) Commander Nolidae (5%). Rest of the 12% species of the studied moths 18 Ypthima huebneri (Kirby) Common four ring belongs to: , , Limacodidae, 19 Athyma nefte inara (Westwood) Colour Sergeant Notodontidae, and Lasiocampidae. Lepidopterans are now Family –Papilionidae regarded as indicators of Ecological health. For example, Graphium agamemnon Beccaloni and Gaston [9] found a significant positive 20 Green-Spotted Triangle (Linnaeus) correlation between the species richness of Amazonian Graphium doson (Felder& Ithnomiina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Studies of Blair [10], 21 Common Jay Swengel and Swengel [11] indicated that diversity of butterflies Felder) Common Lime within a certain habitats can be used to predict the diversity of 22 Papilio demoleus (Linnaeus) Birds. Similarly in Moths, Keith et al. [12] studied that Butterfly (Erebidae) and Notodontidae are the potential 23 Papilio polytes (Linnaeus) Common Mormon indicator taxa in deciduous forests. Arctiinae act as indicator 24 Papilio polymnestor (Cramer) Blue Mormon of moth species richness and Notodontidae as disturbance Family – Lycaenidae indicator. Therefore, results of the study can be used for 25 anita (Hewitson) Purple Leaf Blue making the conservation strategies for important biological 26 Tajuria cippus (Fabricius) Peacock Royal resources. No doubt, results based on one survey is definitely Family- Pieridae not considered as a good information but when we don’t have 27 Catopsilia florella (Fabricius) Common Gagrant the documentation of even single species from a particular 28 Eurema hecabe (Linnaeus) Common Grass yellow area than such type of publications will act as a baseline data for the further studies from that region. As mentioned in 29 Huphina nerrissa (Fabricius) Common Gull introduction, Palkot WLS is unique in geography, so vast Family-Riodinidae opportunities are there for exploration of many more species 30 Dodona egeon(Westwood) Orange Punch of Lepidoptera from the sanctuary. Repeated surveys with

~ 655 ~ Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Table 2: List of Moths

S. No. Genus & Species Family-Sphingidae 1 Pergesa acteus (Cramer) 2 Theretra oldenlandiae (Fabricius) 3 Theretra alecto (Linnaeus) 4 Ambulyx subocellata (Felder) 5 Psilogramma menephron (Cramer) 6 Acherontia styx (Westwood) Family- Erebidae 7 Artena dotata (Fabricius) 8 Achaea janata (Linnaeus) 9 Grammodes geometrica Fabricius 10 mygdon (Cramer) 11 Trigonodes hyppasia Cramer 12 Mocis frugalis Fabricius

13 Mocis undata Fabricius 14 Pericyma cruegeri Butler 15 diversipennis Walker 16 Ercheia cyllaria Cramer 17 Buzara luteipalpis Walker 18 Hamodes propitia Guerin-Meneville 19 Creatonotos gangis (Linnaeus) 20 Creatonotos (Phissama)transiens (Walker) 21 Olepa (Ricinia) ricini (Fabricius) 22 Olepa (Orhanta) koslandana Orhant 23 Spilarctia oblique (Walker) 24 Spilarctia sp. 25 Amerila astreus (Drury) 26 Cyana peregrina (Walker) 27 Cyana puella (Drury) 28 Cyana guttifera (Walker)

29 Cyana subornata(Walker) 30 Cyana bianca Walker 31 Brunia antica (Walker) 32 Amata passalis Fabricius 33 Syntomoides imaon Cramer 34 Aemene taprobanis Walker 35 Aemene nilgiricaHampson 36 Dolgoma brevipennis(Walker) 37 Micraloa lineola Fabricius 38 Micraloa emittens Walker 39 Utetheisa pulchelloides Hampson 40 Stigmatophora palmate (Moore) 41 Lymantria marginata Walker 42 Lymantria serva (Fabricius) 43 Lymantria semisincta (Walker) 44 Asota caricae (Fabricius) 45 Asota ficus (Fabricius) 46 Digama hearseyana Moore 47 Digama insulana Felder 48 Calesia haemorrhoa Guenee 49 Episparis liturata Fabricius Family: Noctuidae 50 Spodoptera litura Fabricius 51 Spodoptera mauritia Boisduval Family: Crambidae 52 asialis(Guenee) Family: Limacodidae 53 Cheromettia laleana (Moore) Family –Nolidae 54 Earias vittella (Fabricius) 55 Earias luteolaria (Hampson) 56 Xanthodes transversa (Guenee) Family –Notodontidae 57 Allata argentifera ( Walker) 58 Teleclita sp. Family–Lasiocampidae 59 Gastropacha pardale (Walker)

~ 656 ~ Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

~ 657 ~ Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

~ 658 ~ Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

~ 659 ~ Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

~ 660 ~ Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

5. References 1. Website of Jharkhand Wildlife, Department of Forest & Environment, Govt. of Jharkhand. http://www.jharwildlife.in/2014-10-09-13-56-25/2014- 10-10-15-05-38/palkot.html 2. Management plan of Palkot Wildlife Sanctuary, Department of Forest & Environment, Govt. of Jharkhand 3. Champion HG, Seth SK. A revised survey of the Forest Types of India, Government of India, Manager of Publications, Delhi, India, 1968. 4. Hampson GF. The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma, Moths. Taylor and Francis Ltd., London, 1892; 1:1-611. 5. Hampson GF. The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma, Moths. Taylor and Francis Ltd., London, 1894; 2:1-609. 6. Hampson GF. The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma, Moths-3. Taylor and Francis Ltd., London, 1895; 3:1-546. 7. Nieukerken EJV, Kaila L, Kitching IJ, Kristensen NP, Lees DC, Minet J et al. Order Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758. In: Zhang, Z.-Q.(Ed.), Biodiversity: An Outline of Higher-Level Classification and Survey of Taxonomic Richness, Zootaxa, 2011; 3148:212-221. 8. Zahiri R, Holloway JD, Kitching IJ, Lafontaine JD, Mutanen M, Wahlberg N. Molecular phylogenetics of Erebidae (Lepidoptera, ). Systematic Entomology. 2012; 37:102-124. 9. Beccaloni GW, Gaston KJ. Predicting the species richness of Neotropical forest butterflies: ithnomiinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) as indicators. Biol. Conserv. 1995; 71:77-86. 10. Blair RB. Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity? Ecol. Apps 1999; 9:164-170. 11. Swengel SR, Swengel AB. Correlations in abundance of grassland songbirds and prairie butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 1999; 90:1-11. 12. Keith SS, Lisa MR, Thomas OC. Forest moth taxa as indicators of Lepidopteran richness and habitat disturbance: a preliminary assessment Biological Conservation 2004; 116:9-18 13. Kehimkar I. Butterflies of India. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai. 2016, xii+ 528.

~ 661 ~