DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Plunkett's Disappointment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Plunkett's Disappointment [2006] ANZLH E-Journal PLUNKETT’S DISAPPOINTMENT: THE REVELANCE OF CATHOLICISM TO A JUDICIAL APPOINTMENT TO THE NEW SOUTH WALES BENCH IN THE 1840s Tony Earls* Prior to the introduction of responsible government in 1856, New South Wales had three Chief Justices, successively; Forbes, Dowling and Stephen. The Crown appointed Forbes on the advice of the Colonial Office in London. With the appointments of Dowling and Stephen, the Colonial Office looked to the advice of the Governor of New South Wales to make an appointment from within the local legal profession. Although William Burton challenged Dowling’s claim to succeed Forbes on a question of seniority, it was the events that led up to the appointment of Stephen, involving two highly credentialed and ambitious candidates, that first tested substantial questions as to rights of precedence and other factors relevant to the appointment. It need hardly be said that the appointment was, and is, a prestigious and important one. However, in order to consider the implications of an appointment, it is useful to attempt to explain why. For the individual, it is the pinnacle of any legal career, affording status and power in their own time and posterity thereafter. In the first half of the nineteenth century this was particularly true when it came to questions of social and governmental rank.1 Amongst other things, a Chief Justice might expect a knighthood following appointment as Chief Justice. As a force in society, the primary influence of a Chief Justice relates not only to the judgement of major cases, but to the administration of the courts, the keystone of the legal system. Of equal importance is the Chief Justice’s role in protecting the integrity of judicial independence. This vital reality was established by New South Wales’ first Chief Justice, Forbes, in his refusal to bow to the dictates of Governor Darling. In the decades before responsible government this judicial independence had possibly an even greater importance, in the light of a compelling argument that the courts of that time provided a valid forum for quasi-democratic expression that was not otherwise available to large sections of the colonial populace.2 *Legal practitioner, Sydney 1 The extent of this is not fully reflected in the salary scales of the time. The following salary levels may provide some context with respect to the various legal offices that came into play during a ‘game of musical chairs’ that was relevant to the judicial appointments which are the subject of this paper: Chief Justice - £2,000 per annum, Puisne Judge - £1,500 per annum, Attorney General - £1,200 per annum, Solicitor General - £800 per annum, Commissioner Court of Requests - £1,000 per annum. (Figures from 1845 Estimates, as published Sydney Morning Herald 23 July 1844). 2 See, D.Neal, The Rule of Law in a Penal Colony (Cambridge University Press, 1991). 1 Perhaps of lesser importance is the symbolic significance of who occupies the position of Chief Justice, or what section of the community they are associated with. This has rarely been an overt consideration because of conservatism. This conservatism is inherent partly because stable government lends itself towards the predicability of a status quo with respect to senior non-elected positions, and partly because historically the senior levels of the legal profession (from whom a Chief Justice must be drawn) have tended to come from the same, or similar, sections of the community (perceived Anglo-male Christians, with an upper class or aspiring middle class financial status). It is only on the rare occasions when someone who has been perceived as coming from a different mould, such as Isaac Isaacs,3 has been a contender that the appointment has had any symbolic significance as an expression of social trust and establishment pluralism. One would be hard pressed to make a viable case that such symbolic significance has ever been a significant factor in favour of the selection of any Australian Chief Justice. It is somewhat easier to demonstrate that in some instances it has been a factor relevant to exclusion from the position. John Hubert Plunkett was one of the first persons to benefit when the Catholic Relief Act was passed by the Westminster parliament in 1829. Prior to the Act, the fact that he was a Roman Catholic would have rendered him ineligible for the position of Solicitor General to New South Wales. His appointment to that post marked the first appointment of a Catholic to a position of high office in Australia. In Ireland, the young Plunkett had been a dedicated member of the Catholic Association’s campaign that brought about that Act of Catholic Emancipation. It had been that campaign that had inculcated in Plunkett the values of equality before the law that were to be the hallmark of his career. He had a close association with the leader of the Catholic Association, Daniel O’Connell, and O’Connell had exercised his political influence to obtain the position in New South Wales for Plunkett. In doing so, O’Connell had predicted that one day Plunkett would become the Chief Justice of the Colony.4 On his arrival in the colony in June 1832, Plunkett found the conduct of the government’s legal business in a shambles. Foremost amongst his difficulties was the burden of covering for the, then, Attorney General, John Kinchela, whose capacity was limited due to deafness. Plunkett effectively undertook the work of two men, and he claimed the strain of those early years nearly broke him.5 In 1836, when Kinchela was elevated to the bench in the reshuffle that followed the retirement of Chief Justice Forbes, Plunkett, at age 33, was 3 Isaac Isaacs, Justice of the Australian High Court 1906-1936, as Chief Justice 1930-1931, the son of a tailor of Polish–Jewish origins. 4 . In a letter to, then, Solicitor General Plunkett, O’Connell alluded to the future he saw when Plunkett should reurn to Ireland: ‘When you come to see your friends having sat some years with credit to yourself and benefit to the Colony as Chief Justice you will I trust find Ireland as she ought to be’. Letter, dated 19 September 1932, to be found in, Maurice R. O’Connell (ed), The Correspondence of Daniel O’Connell, (Dublin: Irish University Press for the Irish Manuscripts Commisssion, 1972-), Letter 3340. 5 J. N. Molony, An Architect of Freedom: John Hubert Plunkett inNews South Wales 1832-1869 (ANU Press, 1973) p.13. 2 formally appointed Attorney General. At that age it might be fair to presume his ambitions did not end there. Plunkett’s virtues were appreciated not just in Sydney, but in the Colonial Office in London. In 1841 he took leave and returned to Ireland, ostensibly to settle some family affairs. During the course of that visit he worked in the Colonial Office and advised on the constitutional reform to be brought about by the 1842 New South Wales Act.6 Although he was on leave, there was some doubt as to whether he would return to NSW. He seems to have enquired about the possibility of a position ‘at home’.7 It seems unlikely that anything suitable was offered to him, for he returned to the colony in August 1843. Within a year of his return, Chief Justice Dowling unexpectedly retired as Chief Justice due to ill health, and died shortly thereafter. The acknowledged leader of the Bar, Plunkett first led the tributes to the Chief Justice, and then staked a claim to the vacant position. However, he had a rival. Alfred Stephen, who had been on the Supreme Court bench as a judge since 1839, also applied for the position. In order set the contest that followed in context, it is necessary to recall some judicial machinations in the years leading up to Dowling’s death. In 1839 there was a three-man Supreme Court Bench of Dowling, Burton and Willis. When Burton took a lengthy leave of absence, Plunkett was offered a temporary Judgeship. He declined, ostensibly on the basis that too many criminal cases and the Attorney General’s legislative programme would be disrupted for the sake of what was only a temporary position. This does not seem unreasonable given his request for a leave of absence had been deferred for the same reason. Alfred Stephen was prevailed upon to take the position instead. In 1841, while Plunkett was on leave, Stephen’s Judgeship was made permanent. This appointment followed the relocation of the irascible Willis as Resident Judge to Port Phillip in 1840. Burton returned to make up the threesome on the Sydney Bench, but left again in 1843, to take up a position in Madras. John Nodes Dickinson was sent out from England as Burton’s replacement. It appears that pending Dickinson’s arrival a temporary Judgeship was again offered to Plunkett and declined, and at Plunkett’s urging the local Solicitor General, William à Beckett, took the post. Meanwhile in Melbourne, Willis’s eccentric conduct caught up with him, and, in June 1843, he was dismissed by Governor Gipps. William Jeffcott replaced Willis in Port Phillip, but when Willis appealed against his dismissal to the Privy Council, Jeffcott formed the remarkable apprehension that he and his judgements might be ruled invalid, and, in December 1844, resigned. Roger Therry, the long-standing Commissioner of the Court of Requests, agreed to fill the breach in Port Phillip, again as a temporary judge, pending Willis’s appeal. 6 Molony, p.42. 7Molony, p.48. 3 It is hard not to have some sympathy for Gipps as he tried to manage his limited legal resources.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sir Alfred Stephen and the Jury Question in Van Diemen's Land
    Sir Alfred Stephen and the Jury Question in Van Diemen's Land The Quest for Trial by Jury Just as a child grows and develops into an adult, it cannot but be in- fluenced by background, environment and social conditioning. So it was with the young Van Diemen's Land. Initially, there was the Eng- lish political, social and economic inheritance, which had a great ef- fect on the form of government adopted. Like an authoritarian parent stood the Imperial Parliament, but at the same time, offering some latitude for Van Diemen's Land to engage in some liberal develop- ment. Like a child, Van Diemen's Land offered little resistance. There was a Governor, a judiciary of sorts, and an administrative bu- reaucracy with control over Van Diemen's Land by way of legislation of the Imperial Parliament, such as that of 182 3, 182 8 and 1842. This control led to Van Diemen's Land becoming firmly under the grip of Mother England. The colony now consisted of free settlers, convicts and emancipists, and a few Aboriginals. The colonists must have coined the Nike catch phrase 'Just Do It (for yourself)!' for they sought to enhance their own success and to empower themselves. This was consistent with the attitude of imperialist conquerors throughout the old British Em- pire: to get what they could for themselves in the way of wealth, con- trol and power. There is no better example of this than Governor George Arthur, a career civil servant who amassed a fortune as a landowner and trader, not only in Van Diemen's Land but in other colonies where he saw service.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Court System in the District of Port Phillip in 1835, John
    (Unrevised Version) REMARKS OF THE HON. MARILYN WARREN AC CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA AT THE ROYAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF VICTORIA ON THURSDAY, 28 APRIL 2011 Early History of the Victorian Legal System* The Early Court System in the District of Port Phillip In 1835, John Batman’s schooner Rebecca ventured about six miles up the Yarra River and set foot on land which Batman considered an ideal place for a village. Batman encouraged the Aborigines he met there to sign a deed for the transfer of 600,000 acres of land in exchange for a yearly supply of blankets, knives, looking glasses, clothing and flour. This was the Batman treaty. Soon after, as other ships brought settlers in vast numbers, the yearly tribute to the local tribes was forgotten and the settlement of a permanent white population began to take root.1 In 1836 this tiny village that was to one day become Melbourne had a population of only 166.2 Professor Blainey described the place as ‘a hillbilly town’. That year the Governor in Sydney authorised a larger settlement in the Port Phillip district, but it remained part of the colony of New South Wales and was 1 Carroll, Brian, Melbourne, An Illustrated History (Lansdowne Press, 1972), 12-16. 2 The Supreme Court of Victoria, A Short Account of the Law Court and the Library (The Hawthorn Press, 1976, Melbourne), 3. 1 largely governed by the Sydney administration. During a public meeting in June 1836, the settlers voiced dissatisfaction with this state of affairs and expressed a desire for independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Printing
    RARE BOOKS • MANUSCRIPTS • PAINTINGS • PRINTS • RARE BOOKS • MANUSCRIPTS • PAINTINGS • PRINTS HORDERN HOUSE HORDERN HOUSE 77 VICTORIA ST POTTS POINT SYDNEY NSW 2011 AUSTRALIA +612 9356 4411 www.hordern.com JULY 2011 Sydney Printers before 1860 chiefly from the Robert Edwards library. [email protected] Hordern House recently received the wonderful library of Dr Robert Edwards AO, and over the next year or two we will be offering the library for sale. Bob is one of the great figures of Australian cultural history, at different times working as a leading anthropologist, a central figure in the study of indigenous art, a museum director and a driving force behind many of the international blockbuster art shows to travel to Australia. His early training as an anthropologist saw him doing fieldwork in remote Australia, and led to him becoming a museum curator in the 1960s and 70s. He was the founding director of the Australia Council’s Aboriginal Arts Board, perhaps most famous for its support of the Papunya Tula artists. He was the Director of the Museum of Victoria from 1984-90, the founding chairman of the National Museum of Australia and the founding chairman of the National Portrait Gallery. He has also for many years been the chief executive of Art Exhibitions Australia which brought to Australia significant exhibitions, including the Entombed Warriors from China (1982), Claude Monet (1985), Van Gogh (1993) and Rembrandt (1997). Bob is an ardent bibliophile, and his Library reflects the discerning taste of a knowledgeable and educated collector. Some books are of such rarity that they are known in only a handful of copies, and his collection embraces early Australian printing, early works on the Australian Aborigines, the major early voyage accounts, as well as works on early settlement and inland exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • LORD CARRINGTON Papers, 1860-1928 Reels M917-32
    AUSTRALIAN JOINT COPYING PROJECT LORD CARRINGTON Papers, 1860-1928 Reels M917-32 Brigadier A.A. Llewellyn Palmer The Manor House Great Somerford Chippenham, Wiltshire National Library of Australia State Library of New South Wales Filmed: 1972 CONTENTS Page 3 Biographical note 4 Selected speeches, letters and recollections 6 Australian correspondence, 1885-1918 8 Australian papers, 1877-91 9 Newspaper cuttings and printed works, 1882-1915 11 General correspondence, 1885-1928 14 Portraits 14 Miscellaneous papers, 1860-1914 17 Diaries of Lady Carrington, 1881-1913 19 Diaries of Lord Carrington, 1888-93 2 BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE Charles Robert Carrington (1843-1928), 3rd Baron Carrington (succeeded 1868), 1st Earl Carrington (created 1895), 1st Marquess of Lincolnshire (created 1912), was born in London. He was educated at Eton and Trinity College, Cambridge. As a schoolboy, he was introduced to the Prince of Wales and they were to be close friends for over fifty years. Carrington was the Liberal member for High Wycombe in Buckinghamshire in 1865-68. He became a captain in the Royal House Guards in 1869 and in 1875-76 was aide-de-camp to the Prince of Wales on his tour of India. In 1881 he was appointed lieutenant-colonel of the Royal Buckinghamshire Infantry. In 1878 he married Cecilia (Lily) Harbord, the daughter of Baron Suffield. In 1885, at the urging of the Prince of Wales, Carrington was appointed governor of New South Wales. With his wife and three daughters, he arrived in Sydney in December 1885 and they remained in the colony for almost five years. The Carringtons were a popular couple and generous hosts, especially during the celebrations of Queen Victoria’s jubilee in 1887 and the New South Wales centenary celebrations in 1888.
    [Show full text]
  • SIR WILLIAM DENISON Papers, 1846-64 Reels M606-607, M671
    AUSTRALIAN JOINT COPYING PROJECT SIR WILLIAM DENISON Papers, 1846-64 Reels M606-607, M671 Col. W.M.W. Denison Newark Nottinghamshire National Library of Australia State Library of New South Wales Filmed: 1960 BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE William Thomas Denison (1804-1871) was born in London and attended Eton and the Royal Military College. He graduated in 1826 as a lieutenant in the Royal Engineers. He served in Canada and later worked on harbour defences in southern England. In 1838 he married Caroline Hornby and they had six sons and four daughters. He was promoted to the rank of captain in 1841. In 1846, following the dismissal of Sir John Eardley-Wilmot, he was appointed Lieutenant-Governor of Van Diemen’s Land. He was knighted in the same year and awarded a KCB in 1856. He arrived in the colony in January 1847 and held the office for eight years. A strong supporter of the continuance of convict transportation, he clashed with the nominated Legislative Council and two of the judges. The publication of some of his despatches, criticising the colonists generally, added to his unpopularity. His powers were reduced following the creation of an elected Legislative Council in 1850 and, with the cessation of transportation, his later years in Tasmania were more harmonious. In January 1855 Denison was appointed Governor of New South Wales and was given the additional title of ‘Governor-General of Australia’. Prompted by the Crimean War, he immediately reorganised the defences of Sydney Harbour. He presided over the introduction of responsible government in the colony in 1856 and had to deal with considerable political instability, with three ministries formed in the first year.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen, Robert Campbell
    Stephen, Robert Campbell ASC 1886 HONOURED BY THE KING; COLONEL ROBERT CAMPBELL STEPHEN. Who has been created a Companion of the Bath. Colonel Stephen is the eldest son of the late Hon. S. A. Stephen, of Sydney. He was educated at All Saints' College, Bathurst, and then entered Trinity College, Cambridge. After leaving the University he joined the militia, and obtained a commission In the King's Liverpool Regiment. Subsequently, he received a commission in, and was adjutant of, the 14th Hussars, and also of the Imperial Warwickshire Yeomanry. He commanded the 14th Hussars in India up to the commencement of the war, when he was made colonel, and retained the command for about a year. While stationed at Meerut he was brigadier-general, and from there went to Mesopotamia' in command of the 6th Cavalry Brigade. He returned from there on March 16 last year, suffering from a bad attack of dysentery, and is now in London waiting to be passed by the Medical Board as fit for further active service. Colonel Stephen is a brother of Mr. Colin Stephen, of Messrs. Stephen, Jaques, and Stephen, solicitors. BRIGADIER-GENERAL STEPHEN RETURNS TO SYDNEY. After a distinguished career with the British Army, Brigadier-General Robert Campbell Stephen, who is related to the Messrs. Stephen, of the Sydney Arm of solicitors, Stephen, Jaques, and Stephen, returned by the Cathay yesterday to Australia? He want to England when a boy, and entered Trinity College, Cambridge. There he entered the 14th Hussars, in which he rose rapidly. In 1896 he was promoted to the rank of captain, and in the same year became adjutant.
    [Show full text]
  • 2300-Forbes Flyer DEC03-5
    ForbesForbes FlyerFlyer THE NEWSLETTER OF THE FRANCIS FORBES SOCIETY FOR AUSTRALIAN LEGAL HISTORY ISSUE 3 DECEMBER 2003 History reports itself Making History It is a curious aspect of contemporary culture that the Australian Investigating the South public venerate their sporting heroes and pop idols with such Australian Independent Bar* enthusiasm but spare little thought the men and women who make a significant contribution to government or public service. Of the 150 or so barristers in That is not to say that other nations do not celebrate sporting South Australia, John Emerson or cultural achievements, but in Europe, Canada and America hopes to interview around 100 there is also a certain ethos reserved for great political and legal of them to gain the broadest figures that arguably adds much to the national life. possible perspective for the book The oddity of it is that lack of interest is no explanation. he is writing on the history of the Biographies of the significant politicians or judges of the United South Australian Independent Bar. States of America and Great Britain frequently grace Australian A chance meeting with Justice bookshelves, and names like Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr and Lord John Emerson Tom Gray in 2001 led to discussion Denning have resonance all over the globe. Such is the interest about the history of the Chief in these figures that they have developed their own legend Justices of South Australia, which John was subsequently beyond the community of lawyers. As I write I can be confident commissioned to write (through the John Bray Law that historians somewhere are industriously re-visiting earlier Chapter of the Alumni Association of the University of works and revising, re-interpreting and re-writing the lives and Adelaide).
    [Show full text]
  • PR8022 C5B3 1984.Pdf
    'PR C60d.a.. •CS�� lq81t- � '"' �r,;,�{ cJ c::_,.:;;J ; �· .;:,'t\� -- -- - - -- -2-fT7UU \�1\\�l\1�\\�1\l�l\\\\\ I 930171 3\ �.\ 3 4067 00 4 ' PR8022. C5B3198 D e CENG __ - Qv1.1T'n on Pn-oU.t::t!. C 5831984 MAIN GEN 04/04/85 THE UNIVERSI'IY OF QUEENSlAND LIBRARIES Death Is A Good Solution THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND PRESS SCHOLARS' LIBRARY Death Is A Good Solution The Convict Experience in Early Australia A.W. Baker University of Queensland Press First published 1984 by University of Queensland Press Box 42, St Lucia, Queensland, AustraW. ©A.W.Bakerl984 This book is copyright. Aput &om my fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Enquiries should be made to the publisher. Typeset by University of Queensland Press Printed in Hong Kong by Silex Enterprise & Printing Co. Distributed in the UK, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Caribbe1n by Prentice Hall International, International Book DistnOutors Ltd, 66 Wood Lane End, Heme! Hempstead, Herts., England Distributed in the USA and Canada by Technical lmpex Corporation, 5 South Union Street, Lawrence, Mass. 01843 USA Cataloauing ia Publication Data Nt�tiorralLibraryoJAustrtJ!ia Baker, A.W. (Anthony William), 1936- Death is a good solution. Bibliography. .. ---· ---- ��· -�No -L' oRAR'V Includes index. � OF C\ :��,t;�,�k'f· I. Aumalim litera�- History mdl>AAI�. � �· 2. Convicts in literature. I. Title (Series: University of Queensland Press scholars' library). A820.9'3520692 LibrtJryofCortgrtss Baker, A.W.(Anthony William), 1936- Death is a good solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Alfred Stephen.Pdf
    2447 BOOK REVIEW Sir Alfred Stephen: Third Chief Justice of New South Wales 1844-1873 By J.M. Bennett (Lives of the Australian Chief Justices series). Australian Bar Review The Hon. Michael Kirby AC CMG AUSTRALIAN BAR REVIEW BOOK REVIEWS J.M. Bennett, Sir Alfred Stephen: Third Chief Justice of New South Wales 1844-1873 (Lives of the Australian Chief Justices series) The Federation Press, 2009, ISBN 978 186287 754 2 (Hbk) In his opening acknowledgements, the author of this new biography, Dr. John Bennett AM, puts his finger on one of the problems that haunts legal history. „It is too legal for historians and too historical for lawyers‟. This feature may help to explain the decline in the teaching of legal history at Australian law schools1. If there are occasional glimmers of light, as in this book and in the recent publication of the Kercher Reports (Federation Press, Sydney, 2009), edited by Bruce Kercher and Brent Salter for the Francis Forbes Society of Australian Legal History, it is no small thanks to the efforts of Dr. Bennett and a small team of dedicated Australian lawyers, one of whom is the editor of this Journal. This is the thirteenth volume in Dr. Bennett‟s Lives of the Australian Chief Justices. The many references throughout this volume to Sir Samuel Way, Chief Justice of South Australia, at the time when Sir Alfred Stephen served as the third chief justice of New South Wales, suggests that there are interesting volumes still to come. All believers amongst us must pray for Dr. Bennett‟s long life.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Legal Dynasties: the Stephens and the Streets
    Australian legal dynasties: The Stephens and the Streets KAREN FOX The word ‘dynasty’ evokes images of hereditary rulers, striding dusty castle corridors where their families have ruled for centuries. It might also suggest dominant political families, like the Kennedys, in republican settings like the United States of America. The term can, however, also be used to describe prominent families in other fields, such as business or the law, in which a succession of individuals from one family have scaled the heights of their profession. A number of such families have lived and worked in Australia, and their stories are captured in the biographies told in the Australian Dictionary of Biography and the associated People Australia websites. This article explores the stories of two families who might be thought of as Australian legal dynasties: the Stephens and the Streets. Between them, these two families produced across several generations four chief justices of New South Wales—and one person who turned the job down—as well as at least four other judges, and numerous successful barristers and solicitors. The Stephens family who came to be renowned in the legal world in Australia were a branch of a notable British clan, several of whose members were distinguished in the law in England, and one of whom—Sir Leslie Stephen—was the first editor of the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. The first lawyer in the branch of the family that was to become eminent in Australia seems to have been James, a conveyancer, who was born in 1733.1 James and his wife Sibella had several children.
    [Show full text]
  • 63 Chapter 3 the O'farrell AFFAIR Fenian, Or Moonstruck Miscreant
    63 Chapter 3 THE OFARRELL AFFAIR Fenian, or moonstruck miscreant - one or both - What matter? Grant him of that serpent brood, Pests of the Green Isle... Judge Francis, God Speed the Galatea, April 18681 ...as Irishmen and uncompromising Haters of British Misrule and oppression, we fling back with scorn the foul calumny that would connect us with the cowardly attempt to assassinate your English Prince. Hibernicus to the Argus (Melbourne), 14 March 18682 Simmering fears and suspicions long held by conservative loyalists towards radical Irish nationalism in Australia were suddenly brought to a head in March 1868, when an Irish-born colonist named Henry OFarrell attempted to assassinate Queen Victorias younger son, Prince Alfred, Duke of Edinburgh, at a Sydney picnic ground. For many loyalists the mere fact that OFarrell was Irish was alone sufficient indication as to his motives. It was common knowledge that considerable sympathy for Fenianism existed among poorer Irish Catholics particularly, and that protests about the Manchester executions were likely on or before St. Patricks Day. A widespread loyalist impression therefore, was that Fenianism had spread its diabolical influence in a direct, conspiratorial way to Australia. There followed a deluge of bitter racial, nationalist and religious rancour that arose mainly from loyalist over-reactions to OFarrells crime, prompted by prior conditioning towards Irish disloyalty and furious indignation that Alfred was attacked on Australian soil at the very time colonial loyalty to Britain was on display. This chapter examines OFarrells motives, and the social and political context of the attempted assassination. Henry James OFarrell had a middle-class upbringing in a moderately (1) Sydney Morning Herald, 6 April 1868.
    [Show full text]
  • Felons, Mutineers and Other Learned Friends
    Felons, Mutineers and Other Learned Friends: A History of the Development of the Colonial Bar in Australia, and the Contribution of its Advocates to the Evolution of the Colonies 1788-1856. CATHERINE ELIZABETH DOUGLAS BA(Hons) LLB(Hons) Macquarie University Department of Law Submitted for consideration on 31 March 2007 M A C Q U A R I t HIGHER DEGREE THESIS AUTHOR’S CONSENT DOCTORAL T his is to certify th at I, . ... Lr.! A .... being a candidate for the degree of Doctor of — 1®-'’- ^ .........................................................am aware of the policy of the University relating to the retention and use of higher degree theses as contained in the University’s Doctoral Degree Rules generally, and in particular rule 7( 10). In the light of this policy and the policy of the above Rules, 1 agree to allow a copy of my thesis to be deposited in the University Library for consultation, loan and photocopying forthwith. M j - Signature of Candidate D ate this .day o f . .20 O j MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY—SYDNEY The Academic Senate on 13 July 2007 resolved that Catherine Elizabeth Douglas had satisfied the requirements for admission to the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. This thesis represents a major part of the prescribed program of study. CONTENTS Summary 4 Statement 5 Acknowledgements 6 Abbreviations 7 Preface 8 A Starting Point: Origins and Myths 10 Part One: Colonial New South Wales 1788-1856 27 1. Running the Penitentiary: 1788-1809 28 2. The Game of Kings: 1809-1823 52 3. Raising the Bar: 1823-1856 73 Interlude: Meanwhile, Back in Britain..
    [Show full text]