DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 APPROVED BY the resolution of the Board of Directors of JSC Atomredmetzoloto (Minutes № 239, May 24th, 2019) INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT JSC ATOMREDMETZOLOTO 2018 THE POWER OF GENERATIONS Table of Contents Key information 2 4 Address of the Chairman Chapter 2 . Chapter 4 . 4.3.1. Intellectual Capital 4.6.1.2. Internal Social of the Board of Directors Strategy and Markets . 24 Capital Management Management ..............66 Investment Management Alexander Lokshin . 6 Performance...............87 2.1. Strategic Vision Results . 46 4.3.2. Innovative Development 4.6.1.3. External Social and Targets . 25 Programme ...............66 Address 4.1. Production Capital......47 Investments. Contribution to the of the Director General Development 2.2. Contribution to the 4.1.1. Mineral Raw Materials 4.3.3. Digital Economy Vladimir Verkhovtsev . 8 of Operation Areas..........90 Achievement of ROSATOM’s Base Development..........47 Performance...............69 Strategic Goals ............26 4.7. Contribution Address of the Nuclear 4.1.2. Production Capital 4.4. Natural Capital ........70 to the National Projects .....94 Energy and Industry Veteran 2.3. Sustainable Development Management ..............48 Valery Litvinenko . 10 . Management ..............27 4.4.1. Natural Capital 4.1.3. Business Management. Environmental 50 Accomplishments 2.4. Natural Uranium Market Diversification .............53 Policy.....................70 of PJSC PIMCU . 6-10 Overview and Outlook ......32 4.1.3.1. Development 4.4.2. Natural Capital 2018 Key Events . .12 . of New Businesses ..........53 Management Performance ...70 4.1.3.2. Project “Production 4.4.2.1. Protection of Land 2018 Key Indicators . 13. of Associated Scandium at Resources and Biodiversity...70 JSC Dalur” ................55 4.4.2.2. Protection of water 4.1.3.3. Project “Processing of resources .................71 Pyrite Cinders at PJSC PIMCU” ............56 4.4.2.3. Air Protection .......72 4.1.3.4. Project “Establishment 4.4.2.4. Waste management..73 of Lithium Carbonate Production 4.4.2.5. Enviromental costs ..74 based on Zavitinsk Appendices 1 3 Deposit Ores” ..............56 4.4.2.6. Community Relation in 5 Environmental Protection ....75 4.1.3.5. Project “Gold Mining Chapter 1 . Chapter 3 . Organization” ..............57 4.4.3. Occupational and industrial Chapter 5 . Appendices . 107 . safety ....................76 Interaction Information about Governance 4.1.3.6. Project “Organization Appendix 1. JSC Atomredmetzoloto . .14 with Stakeholders . 96 Performance . 34 of Titanium and Zirconium 4.5. Human Capital.........78 Report Information........107 1.1. About the Company.....15 3.1. Corporate Concentrate Production at 5.1. Definition 4.5.1. HR Policy Management Appendix 2. Governance System ........35 Tugansk Deposit” ...........57 of Stakeholders..............97 1.1.1. General Information ...15 System ...................78 Table of GRI Disclosures....109 4.1.3.7. Project “Load-Haul- 5.2. Interaction 1.1.2. Holding Structure .....16 3.1.1. Corporate Appendix 3. Governance................35 Dump Machines for Underground 4.5.2. HR Policy Management with Stakeholders............98 1.1.3. Mission, Vision Mining Operations” .........58 Performance...............78 Conclusion of the Internal and Values ................16 3.1.2. Report of the Board of 5.3. Holding Company Control Directorate........111 Directors on the Results of 4.1.3.8. Project “Zirconium” ..58 4.5.2.1.Human Capital Transparency as the Main Appendix 4. Conclusion 1.2. Global Reach ..........17 the Company Development by Features ..................78 Principle of Interaction with 4.1.4. ROSATOM Production on the Results of Independent Priority Business Lines ......40 Stakeholders .............. 100 1.3. Role in ROSATOM’s System. Compliance with Product 4.5.2.2. Remuneration Statement of the Report ...112 3.2. Risk Management ......40 Production Cycle...........18 Quality Requirements .......58 System ...................81 5.4. Commitment to Human List of Abbreviations 1.4. Supply Chain ..........18 3.2.1. Risk Management 4.2. Financial Capital .......60 4.5.3. Personnel Professional Rights Protection .......... 101 System ...................40 and Terms . 116 . 1.5. Value Chain 4.2.1. Financial Development ..............82 5.5. Public Reporting System 104 3.2.2. Key Risks and Their and Business Model ........20 Management ..............60 Contact details . .117 . Management Results........41 4.6. Social Capital ..........84 5.6. Interaction with Stakeholders 1.5.1. Value Chain ..........20 4.2.2. Financial Management during the Report Drafting .. 104 3.3. Internal Control System 4.6.1. Social Investment Performance...............61 1.5.2. Business Model .......21 and Assets Protection ......42 Management ..............84 5.7. Public Assurance Statement 4.2.3. Investment activities...63 on Report................. 105 3.4. Procurement 4.6.1.1. Internal Social Management ..............45 4.3. Intellectual Capital .....66 Investments ...............84 4 JSC Atomredmetzoloto Annual Report 2018 5 GRI 102-14 Chairman of the Board of Directors of JSC Atomredmetzoloto, First Deputy Address of the Chairman of the Board Director General for Operational Management of ROSATOM of Directors Alexander Lokshin Alexander Lokshin Dear readers! on improving competitiveness Construction of a new uranium project, which is being implemented areas. An important component of Before you are the Annual report and introducing innovations to the Mine No. 6 of PJSC PIMCU in at JSC Dalur, has serious prospects. the long-term success strategy of of JSC Atomredmetzoloto, the technological process. the Trans-Baikal Territory, which ARMZ patented a unique technology ROSATOM and the Mining Division began in the reporting period, is for the associated recovery of this is their significant contribution to Mining Division of the ROSATOM, The focus of the Company is the the most important event for the rare-earth metal in demand on the achievement of the Sustainable setting forth the most important development of its own innovative development of uranium production the world market and has already Development Goals, approved by production, social, financial and technologies. Nowadays, ARMZ in Russia. Commissioning of the received confirmation of interest the United Nations. economic performance in 2018. tests a pilot project “Smart mine will contribute to meeting the from buyers. Also, the company Mine”. For this purpose, the most In conclusion, I would like to add Within the reporting period, the needs of ROSATOM in uranium by plans to use its vast experience and promising site of the Holding that the Holding Company has Mining Division successfully replenishing the existing mineral competences in the field of solid Company in JSC Khiagda was impressive scientific, industrial, completed the tasks set by resource base and ensure profitable mineral production in non-nuclear chosen. In case of successful technological and, of course, ROSATOM, providing the nuclear operation of the enterprise for projects - “Titan”, “Lithium”, etc., testing, the experience of creating human resources necessary for the industry with natural uranium in the many years. which are at different stages of a new-generation digital enterprise development of both core and non- amount of 2.9 thousand tonnes and implementation at the moment. implementing a set of measures to will be applied in other ARMZ I want to draw attention to the nuclear competencies. I wish the ensure stable supplies in the future. uranium mining assets. portfolio of new business projects It should be noted that the Division Company success and effectiveness of the Division. In the reporting is constantly working to improve in this difficult task! The ARMZ team once again year, we managed to get additional its own efficiency, thanks to which demonstrated professional and revenue from the sale of sized coal social and charitable programmes well-coordinated work and focused of PJSC PIMCU. The “Scandium” are implemented in the operation 50 Accomplishments of PJSC PIMCU 1974 1972 1971 22 Rated production capacity 1970 was achieved at the Tulukui 18 JANUARY open-pit mine – 600 thou- 1969 sand tonnes of ore per year. 1968 Mine Construction 16 The first stage of the Tulukui Department (MCD) was open-pit mine was commis- established. 12 A computer centre with sioned, and stripping work 1975 6 JANUARY 9 NOVEMBER punched card equipment began in the second phase 19 JANUARY has been established at A Mine No. 3 was formed at Despite the difficult condi- circuit. The construction of facilities 1 FEBRUARY 20 3 JUNE 19 the PMCW (later Cluster the Tulukui uranium deposit. tions, the Mine No. 1, yield for the ore-processing com- Computer Centre - CCC). A Resolution of the A task for the CHPP design the first tonne of uranium 17 JUNE 6 plex (leach and sulfuric acid Council of Ministers of the was received. 7 APRIL ore. plants) was started. 23 FEBRUARY USSR No. 108-31 dated 13 AUGUST The Central Research Receipt of the first BelAZs. Laboratory (CRL) was organ- First tonne of sulfuric acid 20.02.1968 on the estab- 4 SEPTEMBER The first tonne of urani- 20 Excavator operator A.P. 10 NOVEMBER 10 ized as part of the PMCW. DECEMBER was produced. lishment of the Priargunsky um-molybdenum ore was pro- Mine No. 1 was established. Chertopyatov at the Tulukui Central Laboratory of The launch of the Mining and Chemical Works N.N. Demchenko was ap- duced at the Tulukui deposit. for the industrial develop- quarry extracted the first Instrumentation and Krasnokamensk combined pointed the Head of it. bucket of rock from the Automation (CLIA) is estab- heat and power plant. ment of uranium and urani- 14 AUGUST um-molybdenum deposits ground. lished. 5 DECEMBER 11 Railway shop (RWS) was es- based on uranium deposits of tablished in Krasnokamensk. 1973 the Streltsovsky ore district The formation 8 NOVEMBER 27 11 The 150 km long railway to in Trans-Baikal Territory dis- of the PCMW mountain The first boiler house was the station of Kharanor was 15 SEPTEMBER covered in 1963 was issued rescue service began. commissioned to supply heat commissioned. (considered to be the found- to the facilities under con- At Mine No.
Recommended publications
  • Program Jądrowy W Federacji Rosyjskiej 10

    Program Jądrowy W Federacji Rosyjskiej 10

    Program jądrowy w Federacji Rosyjskiej PROGRAM POLSKIEJ ENERGETYKI JĄDROWEJ ANALIZY I OPRACOWANIA 10 materiał informacyjny opracowany przez Departament Energii Jądrowej Ministerstwa Energii JAMAŁ Rosyjski 150-metrowy lodołamacz wyposażony w dwa reaktory jądrowe. Jest jednym z niewielu statków, którym udało się dopłynąć do bieguna północne- go, i jedynym, któremu ta sztuka udała się kilkadziesiąt razy. Jednostka jest również statkiem wycieczkowym posiadającym 50 kabin i apartamentów. Opracowanie uwzględnia dane według stanu na maj 2016. Program jądrowy w Federacji Rosyjskiej Energia jądrowa pozostaje strategicznym priorytetem dla Rosji. Utrzy- muje się stały wzrost jej udziału w bilansie energetycznym kraju zarówno poprzez budowę nowych bloków jądrowych, jak i dzięki znacznej poprawie wydajności istniejących instalacji. Obecnie FR eksploatuje 35 reaktorów energetycznych o całkowitej mocy 26,1 GWe, które dostarczają ok. 18% krajowej produkcji energii elektrycznej, a w budowie znajduje się kolejnych 8 reaktorów. Do roku 2030 planowane jest uruchomienie 15 nowych reaktorów i zwiększenie udziału energii jądrowej w bilansie energetycznym do 25-30%. Kraj ten opanował pełny cykl paliwowy, w tym wzbogacanie uranu oraz przerób wypalonego paliwa i jest samowystarczalny pod względem zaopa- trzenia w paliwo jądrowe oraz postępowania z odpadami promieniotwór- czymi. Eksport urządzeń i usług jądrowych stanowi jeden z głównych celów politycznych i ekonomicznych państwa. Firmy rosyjskie oferują kom- pleksową dostawę technologii (budowa elektrowni, dostarczanie paliwa, demontaż) a państwo zapewnia wsparcie finansowe tych inwestycji. Rosja jest także światowym liderem w technologii reaktorów prędkich. 1 1. Bilans energetyczny Krajowa produkcja energii elek- na krajowe cele energetyczne. reaktora energetycznego. trycznej w 2012 r. wyniosła 1071 W 2015 r. całkowita zainstalo- W dalszej perspektywie strategia TWh, z czego 525 TWh wyprodu- wana moc elektrowni jądrowych rosyjska zakłada, że ograniczone kowano w elektrowniach gazowych wynosiła 26,1 GWe.
  • An Assessment of the Flux of Radionuclide Contamination Through the Ob and Yenisei Rivers and Estuaries to the Kara Sea

    An Assessment of the Flux of Radionuclide Contamination Through the Ob and Yenisei Rivers and Estuaries to the Kara Sea

    NO9700007 An Assessment of the Flux of Radionuclide Contamination Through the Ob and Yenisei Rivers and Estuaries to the Kara Sea THERESA PALUSZKIEWICZ1, LYLE F. HIBLER1, MARSHALL C. RICHMOND2, DON J. BRADLEY2 ''Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Battelle Marine Sciences Laboratory, 1529 West Sequim Bay Road, Sequim, WA 98382, USA . 2Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352, USA. Introduction Extensive radioactive contamination (about 63,000 PBq) has been discharged to the environment of the West Siberian Basin. The former Soviet Union (FSU) nuclear program has been operating for the last 50 years; most of its facilities are located in the West Siberian Basin. These nuclear facilities include three sites for reprocessing spent fuel from the FSU's production reactors: Mayak, Tomsk-7, and Krasnoyarsk-26 (Fig. 1). These are believed to be responsible for the majority of the radioactive contamination that is in the major river systems, the Ob and Yenisei, which feed into the Arctic Ocean through the Kara Sea. Extensive radioactive contamination has been reported in surface water reservoirs, and large amounts of radioactive contamination have been discharged to injection sites that are adjacent to tributaries of the Ob and Yenisei Rivers. A massive release of radionuclide contaminants could result if floods, reservoir failures, or containment failures were to occur (Foley, 1991; Bradley, 1991, 1992a, 1992b; Bradley and Schneider, 1990). The Ob River system consists of the contaminant release sites (FSU nuclear defense sites on land), the terrestrial, ground, and surface waters that link the contaminant release sites to the rivers, the Ob River, its tributaries, the estuary, and the confluence region where the estuaries of the Ob and Yenisei mix and flow into the Kara Sea (Fig.
  • Subject of the Russian Federation)

    Subject of the Russian Federation)

    How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country.
  • Annual Report 2017 (Hereinafter Federal Contests: According to Expert RA • TOP 100 (Rank 36 Ahead of All • in November 2018

    Annual Report 2017 (Hereinafter Federal Contests: According to Expert RA • TOP 100 (Rank 36 Ahead of All • in November 2018

    Table of Contents Adress of the Chairman of the Board of Directors Alexander Lokshin. 2 4 .2 . Financial Capital . 62 APPROVED BY Adress of the Director General Vladimir Verkhovtsev . 3 4 .2 .1 . Financial Management . 62 the resolution of the Board of Directors of JSC Atomredmetzoloto Adress of the President of the Veteran Council Nikolay Petrukhin . 4 4 .2 .2 . Financial Management Performance . 63 10 Years: Sustainable Development Trajectory . 4 4 .2 .3 . Investments . 65 (Minutes No.209 dd. May 25, 2018) 2017 Key Events. 6 4 .3 . Intellectual Capital . 67 2017 Key Indicators . 7 4 .3 .1 . Intellectual Capital Management . 68 4 .3 .2 . Innovative Performance . .. 70 1 . INFORMATION ABOUT JSC ATOMREDMETZOLOTO . 8 4 .3 .3 . Digital Economy Performance. .. 70 This Report has been pre-approved by 1 .1 . About the Company. .. 9 4 .4 . Natural Capital . .71 1 .1 .1 . General Information .. 9 4 .4 .1 . Natural Capital Management Environmental Policy . 71 the Director General, JSC Atomredmetzoloto 1 .1 .2 . Holding Structure . .. 9 4 .4 .2 . Natural Capital Management Performance: . 71 (order No. 003/124-П dd. May 14, 2018) 1 .1 .3 . Mission and Values . 10 4 .4 .2 .1 . Protection of Land Resources and Biodiversity . 71 1 .2 . Market Presence . 10 4 .4 .2 .2 . Protection of Water Resources . 72 1 .3 . Our Role in ROSATOM’s Production Cycle .. 11 4 .4 .2 .3 . Air Protection . 73 1 .4 . Supply Chain . 11 4 .4 .2 .4 . Waste Management . 74 1 .5 . Value Chain and Business Model . .. 13 4 .4 .2 .5 . Environmental Costs . 75 1 .5 .1 .
  • At Work 2021 Edition Foreword

    At Work 2021 Edition Foreword

    At Work 2021 edition Foreword 2020 is a year unlikely to be forgotten anytime soon, for published a white paper, The need for large and small a number of reasons. All of us have been impacted by nuclear, today and tomorrow, describing how both large- the pandemic in one way or another, and we have been scale nuclear power plants and small modular reactors forced to reassess our priorities. The ongoing crisis can play a significant role in the clean energy transition. showcased just how important affordable and reliable Towards the end of 2020, the Association also began electricity is, both hallmarks of the nuclear industry. As we its preparation for COP26 in earnest, meeting with UK look ahead at the challenges of the post-COVID economic government ministers to reinforce the importance of recovery, of achieving greater climate ambitions at COP26 nuclear energy in any deep decarbonization efforts. and reaching the Sustainable Development Goals, nuclear energy is perhaps more important than ever before. The World Nuclear University became virtual in 2020 to Association will continue to devote every effort towards continue its mission to train the future leaders of the ensuring that the industry’s voice is heard loud and clear. nuclear industry. Two World Nuclear Industry Today courses were hosted, one in China and one in Brazil, The pandemic recovery has inevitably been an important with over 1400 participants. Furthermore, three Extended aspect of the Association’s work for the past year. We Leadership Development workshops were hosted, joined forces with the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency attracting more than 350 participants.
  • List of Congress Delegates № Company Name Surname Position 1 AB Engineering St

    List of Congress Delegates № Company Name Surname Position 1 AB Engineering St

    List of Congress Delegates № Company Name Surname Position 1 AB Engineering St. Petersburg Alexandr Alexandrov General Director 2 AB Engineering St. Petersburg Ekaterina Antonen Progect manager 3 AEM-Technology Evgeniy Pakermanov General manager 4 AEOI Rais Ali 5 AF-Consult Roberto Gerosa President International Division 6 Afrikantov OKBM Mechanical Engineering Boris Vasilyev Chief Designer 7 Afrikantov OKBM Mechanical Engineering Feliks Lisitsa Adviser of Director 8 Afrikantov OKBM Mechanical Engineering Igor Shmelev Head of Department 9 Afrikantov OKBM Mechanical Engineering Oleg Kondratenkov Head of Communications Department 10 Afrikantov OKBM Mechanical Engineering Valentin Budilov Head of Bureau 11 Afrikantov OKBM Mechanical Engineering Vitaliy Petrunin First Deputy Director 12 Afrikantov OKBM Mechanical Engineering Vladimir Galushkin Leading Engineer 13 Afrikantov OKBM Mechanical Engineering Yulia Kolesova Engineer 14 Afrikantov OKBM Mechanical Engineering Yuriy Fadeev Chief Designer 15 Agency for Atomic Energy of Hungary Kristof Horvath Deputy Director 16 AKKUYU NPP Alexander Superfin General Director 17 AKME JSC Natalia Zaitseva Strategic Development and International Relations 18 Alexandrov Research Institute of Technology Vyacheslav Vasilenko Director General 19 Alstom Andrey Lavrinenko Regional VP GPS Russia 20 Alstom Alexandr Tsvetkov General director 21 ALVEL Jan Love Consultant 22 ALVEL Josef Belac Chairman of the Board of Directors 23 Amirkabir University of Technology Hossein Afarideh 24 ANDRA Gerald Ouzounian Director international Division 25 ANDRA Jelena Bol 26 Arako Rovshan Abbasov General Director 27 Areva Lyudovik Devos Head of the Delegation 28 Areva Olga Dementieva Project Manager 29 Areva Ludovic Devos Chief representative in Rusia and the CIS 30 Areva Ingo Koban Vice President 31 Areva Luc Oursel President 32 Areva Od Martino Marketing Manager 33 ARMZ Uranium Holding Co.
  • № Company Name Surname Post 1 Administration of the President Of

    № Company Name Surname Post 1 Administration of the President Of

    № Company Name Surname Post Counselor of the Department of Expert Administration of the President of the Directorate of the President of Russian 1 Russian Federation Igor Belousov Federation Aide to the President of the Russian Federation - Administration of the President of the Head of the State Legal Directorate of the 2 Russian Federation Larisa Bricheva President of the Russian Federation Administration of the President of the 3 Russian Federation Arkadiy Dvorkovich Aide to the President Administration of the President of the 4 Russian Federation Sergey Prikhodko Aide to the President 5 AF-Kontroll AB Jorge Benitez Project Manager Eastern Europe 6 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Dmitriy Zverev Director 7 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering В. Sedakov Chief designer 8 Alfa Laval Potok Igor Kutuzov Regional Sales Manager All- Russian Scientific and Research Institute for Nuclear Power Plant Operation VNIIAES, 9 LTD Gennadiy Arkadov General Director All- Russian Scientific and Research Institute for Nuclear Power Plant Operation VNIIAES, 10 LTD Ludmila Akeeva Head of The Center All- Russian Scientific and Research Institute for Nuclear Power Plant Operation VNIIAES, 11 LTD Valeriy Zverkov Head of Prospective Design Department All- Russian Scientific and Research Institute for Nuclear Power Plant Operation VNIIAES, 12 LTD Denis Simagin Deputy Chief Designer - Project Manager All- Russian Scientific and Research Institute for Nuclear Power Plant Operation VNIIAES, 13 LTD Alexander Kroshilin Deputy Director General All- Russian Scientific
  • Rosatom's Nuclear Energy Assistance As Part of Russian Foreign Energy Policy

    Rosatom's Nuclear Energy Assistance As Part of Russian Foreign Energy Policy

    Producing power? Rosatom’s nuclear energy assistance as part of Russian foreign energy policy Tjadina Herbert Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts in Russian and Eurasian Studies, Leiden University Supervisor: Dr. Matthew Frear Date of submission: 30 June 2021 Wordcount: 21.498 (pages 1 – 58) Abstract Rosatom, Russia’s state-owned nuclear corporation, has quickly emerged as the world’s largest provider of nuclear energy assistance. Their long lifespan and large imprint on a country’s electricity generation give nuclear power plants a strategic importance, while the provision of nuclear resources and technological expertise generates long-term dependencies between supplier and client states. As a result, the increased global presence of Rosatom has sparked concerns among observers who fear Russia could use its nuclear energy resources and relationships as leverage to achieve foreign policy goals. This thesis investigates in what ways Rosatom’s nuclear energy assistance could be used as foreign policy tool and whether Russia is actually using it as such. To do so, the thesis presents an analytical framework, based on theories of economic statecraft, that identifies a number of factors - economic power, state control, structural features of nuclear energy, and interstate relationships between client and supplier – as key determinants of the employment and efficacy of nuclear energy assistance as foreign policy tool. The thesis applies these factors to Russian foreign energy policy in the Central and Eastern European region by examining Rosatom’s nuclear energy cooperation with Belarus and Hungary. While Rosatom is certainly a demanding presence on the international nuclear energy market and can count on substantial support from the Russian state to maintain its dominant position, nuclear energy and its international marketplace possess certain qualities that prevent the application of nuclear energy assistance as coercive political pressure tool.
  • Annual Report 2014

    Annual Report 2014

    INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT JSC ATOMREDMETZOLOTO 2014 APPROVED by the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of JSC Atomredmetzoloto on June 29, 2015 (Minutes No. 24) This report has been preliminarily approved by Resolution No. 143 of the Board of Directors of JSC Atomredmetzoloto dated May 27, 2015 Table of Contents Address by the Chairman of the Board of Directors 4 3.3.3. Uranium Production by JSC Atomredmerzoloto Russian Address by the Director General 5 Entities 59 Information about the Report 6 3.3.4. Other Entities 61 2014 Key Performance Indicators 8 3.3.5. Rosatom Production System. Complying with Product Quality Requirements 63 2014 Key Achievements 9 3.4. Intellectual Capital Management 65 2014 Main Events 10 3.4.1. Innovative Activities 65 Chapter 1. Information about the company 11 3.5. Human Capital Management 67 1.1. General Information about JSC Atomredmetzoloto 12 3.5.1. Management System 67 1.1.1. General Information 12 3.5.2. Human Capital Features 67 1.1.2. Historical Background 12 3.5.3. Remuneration System 70 1.1.3. Holding Structure 13 3.5.4. Social Policy of the Company 71 1.1.4. The Company’s Role in Rosatom’s Production Cycle 14 3.5.5. Employee Professional Training and Development 72 1.2. Market Presence 14 3.5.6. Work with Youth and Students 73 1.3. Value Chain and Business Model 15 3.5.7. Veteran-Pensioner Support 74 1.3.1. Value Chain 15 3.5.8. Trade Unions and Collective Agreements 74 1.3.2.
  • List of Congress Delegates

    List of Congress Delegates

    List of Congress Delegates № Company Name Surname Position 1 AB "RUSSIA" Pavel Petrovskiy Vice President, Director of corporate business Department 2 AB "RUSSIA" Alexey Vinogradov Head of corporate business corporate business Department 3 Acceleration Management Solutions Angelo Codignoni President 4 Acceleration Management Solutions Morel Jean-Pierre Consultant 5 Acceleration management Solutions Mauro Sipsz Director "Adult Education and Working Life Services 6 Ilya Ouretski Salpaus Further Education" 7 AEM-technology Eugeniy Pakermanov Director General 8 Aeroflot Igor Kozhurov Department of internal control, Director 9 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Sergey Dushev Deputy Chief Designer of Fuel Handling Equipment 10 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Sergey Fateev Lead Engineer 11 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Nadezhda Knyazeva Engineer 12 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Feliks Lisitsa Director Consultant "Chief Auditor - the chief of service 13 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Lyudmila Manuilova internal control and audit" 14 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Evgeniy Naumov Deputy Director for HR Management and Social Issues 15 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Sergey Salnikov Head of International Relations and Foreign Economic Activity Department 16 Afrikantov OKB Mechanical Engineering Igor Shmelev Head of Strategic Development and Foreign Economic Activity Division 17 Akdeniz University Muzaffer Karasulu Professor 18 Akkuyu NPP Tahir Agaev PR/GR manager 19 Akkuyu NPP Fuad Ahundov Director General
  • ОФИЦИАЛЬНЫЙ КАТАЛОГ Official Catalogue

    ОФИЦИАЛЬНЫЙ КАТАЛОГ Official Catalogue

    ОФИЦИАЛЬНЫЙ КАТАЛОГ Official Catalogue IX МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ФОРУМ ПОСТАВЩИКОВ АТОМНОЙ ОТРАСЛИ «АТОМЕКС 2017» IX INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF NUCLEAR INDUSTRY SUPPLIERS ATOMEX 2017 14-16 ноября 2017 г. Москва, Гостиный Двор November 14-16, 2017 Moscow, Gostiny Dvor www.atomeks.ru www.atomeks.ru Форум поставщиков атомной отрасли «АТОМЕКС 2017» СОДЕРЖАНИЕ Contents Приветствия 27-29 МАРТА • МОСКВА Greetings ..........................................................................................................................................................................................4 План выставки Exposition Plan............................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Список участников Participants List ........................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Участники выставки Participants ................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Информационные партнеры Media support ............................................................................................................................................................................142 Программа форума Conference programme ...........................................................................................................................................................154
  • [Document Title]

    [Document Title]

    [EHNUR WP 4] ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER PLANT CONCEPTS AND TIMETABLES FOR THEIR COMMERCIAL DEPLOYMENT Steven C. Sholly1 VIENNA, June 2013 1 Institute of Safety/Security and Risk Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Copyright Vienna, June 2013 Media owner and editor: University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Department of Water, Atmosphere and Environment, Institute of Safety and Risk Sciences, Borkowskigasse 4, 1190 Wien, Austria URL: http://www.risk.boku.ac.at ReportWP4 – Advanced Nuclear Power Plant Concepts and Timetables EHNUR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Most currently operating nuclear power plants are Generation II reactors (except for a few remaining Generation I units and a few Generation III units). Generation III and Generation III+ nuclear power plant concepts are widely recognized to be significant improvements over Generation II reactor designs. Both Generation III designs (standardized designs safer than Generation II) and Generation III+ designs (standardized designs safer than Generation II and with the expectation of greater economy of scale) are available for immediate deployment. The absolute minimum schedule for a Generation III or III+ nuclear power plant project is 10 years from feasibility study to completion of startup testing. Such a schedule is only achievable by: (a) an experienced utility, (b) with the reactor sited at an existing nuclear power plant site, and (c) with a design for which first-of-a-kind engineering (FOAKE) is complete. Under other circumstances (e.g. a utility new to nuclear generation, a greenfield site, a utility in a country without significant nuclear infrastructure, a nuclear power plant design where FOAKE has not yet been accomplished), the schedule would extend from fifteen to seventeen years and perhaps more.