DOCSLIB.ORG

William Hendricks' Political Circulars to His

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

William Hendricks’ Political Circulars to his Constituents : Second Senatorial Term, 1831- 1837” Edited by Frederick D. Hill”” Before the end of his first term in 1831 Senator William Hendricks’ nonpartisan stance was beginning to alienate per- sons in each of the emerging political parties. Some of his opponents in Indiana and elsewhere attempted for more than a year to prevent his reelection in 1830. The Adams-Clay faction condemned him for supporting senatorial confirma- tion of President Andrew Jackson’s appointments. Jackson- ians criticized him for not being a thorough going Jacksonian in legislative matters.l Indiana political parties, however, were loose coalitions for winning elections and controlling patronage rather than organizations of persons holding unique political views. Jack- sonianism consisted of loyalty to a person more than ad- herence to a program. One might easily prefer Jackson to John Quincy Adams or Henry Clay in the White House, yet *An introduction to the political career of William Hendricks and a discussion of political circulars and their use by Hendricks and others were included in the first article in this three part series. See Frederick D. Hill [ed.], “William Hendricks’ Political Circulars to his Constitu- ents: Congressional Period, 1816-1822,” Indiana Magazine of History, LXX (December, 1974), 296-344. The second article in the series was Frederick D. Hill, ed., “William Hendricks’ Political Circulars to his Constituents : First Senatorial Term, 1825-1831,” Indiana Magazine of History, LXXI (June, 1975), 124-80. **Frederick D. Hill is professor of history at Indiana Central University, Indianapolis. Philip Sweetser to John Tipton, May 13, 1829, John Tipton Papers (Indiana Division, Indiana State Library, Indianapolis) ; editorials, Louisville Public Advertiser, February 6, August 23, 1828 ; editorial, Indianapolis Indiana Journal, December 3, 1831; communications, “By their fruits shall ye know them” and “Beware of Woolves in Sheeps Clothing” signed “Jefferson,” Indianapolis Indiana Democrat and State Gazette, May 20, June 10, 1830. 320 Indiana Magazine of History be fully confident of Hendricks’ integrity and ability to repre- sent Indiana in Washington-despite his friendship with Clay. Though hostile expressions aimed at Hendricks can be found in private correspondence and in the press, he was still a popular man in Indiana at the end of his first term. On December 18, 1830, the Indiana General Assembly elected William Hendricks to a second term as United States senator. On the first three ballots he led Congressman Ratliff Boon, the main challenger and an avowed Jacksonian, and others by increasing pluralities; on the fourth he received forty-four votes, two more than needed for election.2 During his second term Hendricks continued as leader of the internal improvement forces in the Senate. He was always chairman of the Standing Committee on Roads and Canals whether committee chairmen were being appointed by the presiding officer or elected by the senators. He also served four sessions on the Committee on Militia and one session each on the Committee on Manufactures and the Committee on Private Land Claims.3 He was in his seat for the opening of every se~sion;~he answered approximately ninty-five per- cent of the roll calls; and he voted with a majority of his colleagues almost seventy-five percent of the time.5 Exercis- ing his independent judgment, however, he dared to oppose both a majority of the senators and the president whenever he believed that a different policy would serve his constituents and the nation better. 2 Dorothy Riker and Gayle Thornbrough, comps., Indiana Election Returns, 181 6-1 851 (Indiana Histo.rica1 Collections, Vol. XL ; Indian- apolis, 1960), 128. 3 Senate Journal, 22 Cong., 1 Sess. (U.S. Serial Set 211), 18 (De- cember 7, 1831); ibid., 22 Cong., 2 Sess. (U.S. Serial Set 229), 21 (December 10, 1832) ; ibid., 23 Cong., 1 Sess. (US. Serial Set 237), 45 (December 16, 1833); ibid., 23 Cong., 2 Sess. (U.S. Serial Set 265), 35 (December 11. 1834) : ibid.. 24 Conn.. 1 Sess. (U.S. Serial Set 278). 40-42 (December 16, 17, 1835) ; ;bid., 24-dong., 2 Sess. (U.S. Serial Sei 296), 32, 34 (December 12, 14, 1836). 4Ibid., 22 Cong., 1 Sess. (U.S. Serial Set 211), 4 (December 5, 1831); ibid., 22 Cong., 2 Sess. (U.S. Serial Set 229), 4 (December 3, 1832) ; ibid., 23 Cong., 1 Sess. (U.S. Serial Set 237), 4 (December 2, 1833); ibid., 23 Cong., 2 Sess. (U.S. Serial Set 265), 4 (December 1, 1834); ibid., 24 Cong., 1 Sess. (U.S. Serial Set 278), 4 (December 7, 1835); ibid., 24 Cong., 2 Sess. (US. Serial Set 296), 4 (December 5, 1836). These percentages were computed from roll call votes recorded in the Register of Debates, 22-24 Cong. (December 5, 1831-March 3, 1837) and the Congvessional Globe, 23-24 Cong. (December 2, 1833-March 3, 1837). Hendricks’ Circulars 321 As the end of his second term approached, Hendricks’ popularity waned. Politics was becoming increasingly parti- san, and for the first time he openly supported a presidential candidate, Martin Van Buren, Jackson’s heir apparent. While he thus offended Indiana’s Whig supporters of William Henry Harrison, many Democrats remained skeptical of his sin- cerity; and when he tried to conduct a nonpartisan senatorial campaign, it was declared that his “noncommittal course, and his trimming between the political parties of this State, can no longer serve his purposes. He will be unmasked, and his false face rendered useless.”fi Also Hendricks’ more than two decades in high public office had aroused jealousy and per- sonal animosity in various quarters. On December 8, 1836, shortly before senatorial balloting began, handbills alleging that he had defrauded his mother-in-law in a real estate trans- action, were distributed to members of the General Assembly on behalf of Jeremiah Sullivan,? who coveted Hendricks’ Senate seat. On the ninth senatorial ballot Oliver H. Smith was chosen to succeed Hendricks. Noah Noble had led on the first seven ballots while Hendricks ranked third on the first ballot and second on the third, fourth, and fifth. His largest vote, however, was only fifty, and seventy-four were needed to win.8 It is impossible to assess the relative effects of several factors on Hendricks’ defeat. Among the key factors were his support of Van Buren for the presidency when Harrison carried Indiana, his nonpartisan stance in the Senate, his alleged effort to be all things to all men in Indiana, and his rumored unfair business dealings with his mother-in-law. It appears, however, that he accepted this defeat that ended his career in public office with his usual equanimity. Having “been a favored citizen of the state a good while,” he said, he could not complain about the results of the election. He did, however, object to Sullivan’s handbill that he described as 6 Editorial, Vincennes Gazette, quoted in Bloomington Post, Septem- ber 30, 1836; Madison Republican Banner, October 19, 1836; editorial, Indianapolis Indiana Democrat, November 25, 1835 ; communication to [Terre Haute] Wabash Couriev, signed “A Wabash Citizen,” quoted in Indianapolis Indiana Democrat, November 30, 1836. William Hendricks “To the People of Indiana,” handbills dated November 22, December 21, 1837, William Hendricks Papers (Indiana Historical Society Library, Indianapolis). Riker and Thornbrough, Indiana Election Returns, 131. 322 Indiana Magazine of History “calumnious, false & vile like its author~.”~When Hendricks left the Senate in 1837 and retired from public office, he had represented Indiana in Congress longer than any other man. He had sat in the House of Representatives from 1816 to 1822 and the Senate from 1825 to 1837. During these eighteen years in Washington, he gave careful attention to the needs and desires of those who had elected him. According to an anonymous writer, “He left no letter unanswered, no public office or document did he fail to visit or examine on request.”lo Despite shifting alignments in an era of growing political partisanship, Hendricks remained independent, although he supported Van Buren in 1836. Regardless of who occupied the White House or what faction controlled Congress, he con- sistently supported internal improvements built at federal expense; Indian removal to make more land available for settlement and prevent friction between Indians and whites; a liberal federal land policy; a stable monetary system regu- lated by a national bank; a protective tariff; confinement of slavery to states where it already existed; and a strong central government. Sometimes he supported incompatible programs in the hope that if his first choice failed to pass his second one would be enacted. He often settled for less than he and his constituents wanted because he believed that half a loaf was better than none. Admittedly on the national scene Hendricks did not make the impact of such contemporaries as Thomas Hart Benton, John C. Calhoun, Henry Clay, or Daniel Webster, and he antagonized various people. But Smith, his successor, doubt- less described him accurately when he said, “He was not of the very first order of talents, but made all up by his plain, practical, good sense. He never attempted to speak upon sub- jects he did not understand.”ll As long as he was in Congress, Hendricks continued to inform his constituents about questions of public interest by means of annual political circulars. Public land policy, in- ternal improvements, Indian affairs, and the tariff were perennial topics. Issues confronting the nation for the first ‘3 Hendricks to David G. Mitchell, December 22, 1836, William H. English Papers (Indiana Historical Society Library). 10 The Indiana Gazetteer or Topographical Dictionary of the State of Indiana (Indianapolis, 1849), 122. Oliver H. Smith, Early Indiana Trials and Sketches (Cincinnati, 1858), 86.
Recommended publications
  • Howard and Tipton Counties

    Howard and Tipton Counties

    PRE-HISTORIC AND INDIAN HISTORY HOWARD AND TIPTON COUNTIES INDIANA./ JUDGE N. R. OVERMAN. 1883. ta #I~ A .................0 1 .. ' w " . , r . '\ i. .+ '" s , PRE-HISTORC AND INDIAN HISTORY OF HOWARD AND TIPTON COUNTIES. THE MOUND-BUILDERS. than a faithful a county should contain little else T HErecord history of the of settlement, development, caste and condition of her people. Howard and Tipton Counties, although now rich in fertile fields and gardens, schools and churches, furnishing to the world more than a pro- portionate share of commerce, with an educational development and ad- vancement that proudly stand in the front ranks, are yet in their infancy. There are now living among us a few faithful pioneers who saw the dense forests first broken, the fields first opened to Anglo-Saxon civilization, education and religion. To write of and about such a people is certainly delightful. To able and faithful hands has been assigned this pleasant duty, but to me in this opening chapter is referred the sadder task of pronouncing the funeral notes of two widely different peoples, who once occupied and cultivated portions of the soil of each county-first, the Mound-Builders, secondly, the Indians-the former extinct many gener- ations before Europe opened her eyes upon America, the latter now " reading their doom in the setting sun." Upon the discovery of America, nearly four hundred years ago, the re- mains of their ancient earthworks, mounds, moats and forts were scattered from Mexico all along the Mississippi and Ohio Valleys, and thence to the lake regions north. The Indians knew nothing of their age, purpose, or cause of construction.
  • 1 Mcculloch, Hugh. Men and Measures of Half a Century. New York

    1 Mcculloch, Hugh. Men and Measures of Half a Century. New York

    McCulloch, Hugh. Men and Measures of Half a Century. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1888. CHAPTER I. Growth of England and the United States — Bill for Railroad from Boston to Salem — Jeremiah Mason — Ichabod Bartlett — Stage-coaching — Boston in 1883 — Its Commercial Character^ — ^Massachusetts — Her High Character — Change in Character of New England Population — Boston — Southern Prejudices against New England — Bishop Spaulding's Anecdote 1 CHAPTER II. Changes in New England Theology — The Westminster Catechism — Dr. Channing's Sermon at the Ordination of Mr. Sparks — Division of the Churches— The Unitarians — The Calvinists— Dr. Beecher tried for Heresy — Thomas Pessenden— His Question to a Dying Christian — Plenary Inspiration 10 CHAPTER III, Boston— Its Lawyers — Daniel Webster — His Varied Talents — His Debate with Hayne — Mr. Calhoun — Sectional Feeling — Race between a Northern and Southern Horse — Mr. Webster before a Jury — Franklin Dexter — Benjamin Curtis — W. M. Evarts — William Groesbeck — Rufus Choate — Richard Fletcher — Mr. Choate and Mr. Clay— Mr. Burlingame and Mr. Brooks — Theodore Lyman — Harrison Gray Otis — Josiah Quincy — Edward Everett — Caleb Cushing — Henry W. Longfellow — Oliver W. Holmes — Interesting Incident 16. CHAPTER IV. The Boston Clergy : Channing, Gannett, Parker, Lowell, Ware, Pierpont, Palfrey, Blagden, Edward Beecher, Frothingham, Emerson, Ripley, Walker — Outside of Boston : Upham, Whitman and Nichols, Father Taylor, the Sailor Preacher— James Freeman Clarke — Edward Everett Hale — M. J. Savage — Decline of Unitarianism — The Catholic Church — Progress of Liberal Thought — Position of the Churches in Regard to Slavery — The Slave Question 37 CHAPTER V. Departure from New England — William Emerson — New York — Philadelphia — Baltimore — Wheeling — The Ohio River — Thomas F, Marshall—Emancipation—Feeling in Favor of it checked by the Profits of Slavery — John Bright and the Opium Trade — Mr.
  • Phases of Southeastern Indiana History by MISS VIDA NEWSOM,Columbus

    Phases of Southeastern Indiana History by MISS VIDA NEWSOM,Columbus

    Phases of Southeastern Indiana History By MISS VIDA NEWSOM,Columbus. (Presented at a meeting of the Jennings County Historical society, August 19, 1922, on occasion of Vernon Homecoming.) It has been interesting to learn something of the accomp- lishments and plans for future usefulness of your county his- torical society. The history of Jennings county, in general, is more or less characteristic of that of other counties in this vicinity and of the entire state. There are, however, several outstanding historical features in this section of Indiana, which were of such considerable significance in the making of our great state, which entered so forcibly into the lives, the early struggles and hardships of our forebears, the pioneers, that they well deserve special mention on this occa- sion. The topic assigned me for discussion, “Phases of South- eastern Indiana History”, affords a wealth of material. So numerous are the aspects of history that have contributed to the development of our great commonweealth in South- eastern Indiana alone, that it: would seem that we of this generation have, indeed, come a long way, and I have realized anew in making this study, and perhaps more forcibly than ever before, how much we owe to future generations if we are to prove worthy of the trust that has been imposed upon us by our ancestors, the Indiana pioneers. But in any retrospective glance of this subject our atten- tion usually reverts, first of all, to the aboriginal inhabitants of this country, to the American Indian. If we are kindly dis- posed and just in this reflection we think of him first in his native state, before he was confronted with the necessity of battling for his home as a result of the coming of the white man who was ever encroaching upon his territory.
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present

    CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present

    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
  • Board Meeting Agenda and Minutes August 25, 2020

    Board Meeting Agenda and Minutes August 25, 2020

    Tippecanoe County Historical Association Board of Governors Meeting Mission: To enrich the lives of Tippecanoe County residents and visitors by collecting, preserving, and interpreting our unique and exciting history AGENDA 5:15 PM, July 28th, 2020 ZOOM CONFERENCE CALL Members of the Board (total: 20 – quorum: 10) Pete Bill – President* Amy Harbor Erika Kvam – Vice President* David Hovde Jeff Schwab – Treasurer* Zula Kress Del Bartlett – Secretary* Ken Moder Colby Bartlett Quentin Robinson Julie Byers Annie Hatke Schap H. Kory Cooper Preston Smith Craig Graham John F. Thieme Walt Griffin Phil Tucker Ron Halsema Todd White Connecting Information for Zoom Meeting If you have a computer with a web camera and microphone (most web cams have a microphone built in), connect to the meeting by clicking on the hi-lited “https://zoom.us/…..” below. If you have not previously downloaded Zoom software, you will be prompted to do so in order to connect to the meeting. The software is free. If you wish to connect by phone, call in one of the three numbers listed below (doesn’t matter which). Once you are connected, you will be asked for your Meeting ID number so you can be placed into the correct meeting. The Meeting ID number is listed below. Join Zoom Meeting https://zoom.us/j/97914622425 Meeting ID: 979 1462 2425 One tap mobile +13126266799,,97914622425# US (Chicago) +19292056099,,97914622425# US (New York) Dial by your location +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) +1 301 715 8592 US (Germantown) Meeting ID: 979 1462 2425
  • History of the U.S. Attorneys

    History of the U.S. Attorneys

    Bicentennial Celebration of the United States Attorneys 1789 - 1989 "The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. As such, he is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer. He may prosecute with earnestness and vigor– indeed, he should do so. But, while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones. It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one." QUOTED FROM STATEMENT OF MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND, BERGER V. UNITED STATES, 295 U. S. 88 (1935) Note: The information in this document was compiled from historical records maintained by the Offices of the United States Attorneys and by the Department of Justice. Every effort has been made to prepare accurate information. In some instances, this document mentions officials without the “United States Attorney” title, who nevertheless served under federal appointment to enforce the laws of the United States in federal territories prior to statehood and the creation of a federal judicial district. INTRODUCTION In this, the Bicentennial Year of the United States Constitution, the people of America find cause to celebrate the principles formulated at the inception of the nation Alexis de Tocqueville called, “The Great Experiment.” The experiment has worked, and the survival of the Constitution is proof of that.
  • THE Removal of the POTA~ATOMI INDIANS: 1820 TO

    THE Removal of the POTA~ATOMI INDIANS: 1820 TO

    The removal of the Potawatomi Indians : 1820 to the trail of death Item Type Thesis Authors McCabe, Michael A. Download date 03/10/2021 01:51:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10484/5099 THE REMOvAL OF THE POTA~ATOMI INDIANS: - 1820 TO 'rHE TRAIL OF DEATH A Thesis Presented. To The Faculty of the Graduate School Indiana State Teachers College Terre Haute, Indiana In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arta in Social Studies by Michael A. McCabe- August 1960- . " , ", " "" ,. , '.' , " , .,. , .. , ., '" . " , " , . THESIS APPROVAL SHEET The thesis of Michael A. McCabe, Contri- bution of the Graduate Division, Indiana State Teachers College, Series I, Number 805, under the title--THE REMOVAL OF THE POTAWATOMI INDIANS: 1820 TO THE TRAIL OF DEATH is hereby approved as counting toward the completion of the Master's Degree in the amount of 8 quarter hours' credit. Approval of Thesis Committee: ~ ... !iii ,~ppr;o:val of. !is:sociate Dean, ~ of Instruction "~ )t; for Grad'!late, , S,tudies: ~,~L ;~J\.l/~o i ee.w ' (Date) -;.'~ j~': ,~;, oj '"", lx':' 1,,_ :. __ ,' c, , ] .~ <-."J '-- "1-," '-~' . 38211 , I PREF'ACE During the 1830's and 1840's the Potawatomi and Miami Indians were removed from Indiana. Various reasons for these removals have been given by history writers. Some of the reasons usually found include the following: Because of Black Hawk's War the settlers were afraid of the Indians and wanted them removed; in order to build canals and roads the Indians' lands were needed; the removal of the Indians was a natural result of the popu- lation increase in Indiana; the Indians were removed because of trouble which developed between the races; and so on.
  • William Hendricks Papers S636 1815-1850 1 Folder

    William Hendricks Papers S636 1815-1850 1 Folder

    William Hendricks Papers S636 1815-1850 1 folder Rare Books and Manuscripts Indiana State Library Processed by: Christina Baich, February 2006 Revised by: Elizabeth M. Wilkinson, April 2007 Finding aid revised: Brittany Kropf, 11/06/2015 Biographical Note: William Hendricks was born on November 12, 1872, in Ligonier Valley, Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania. After graduating from Jefferson College in 1810, he taught school for two years. He studied law in Cincinnati, Ohio, and was admitted to the bar. In 1813, Hendricks moved to Madison, Indiana Territory, where he owned a printing press and became proprietor of the Western Eagle. He was elected to the territorial legislature in 1813 and 1814. He served as Secretary at Indiana’s 1816 Constitutional Convention. When Indiana became a state, Hendricks was elected to U.S. House of Representatives. He resigned during his fourth term to become Governor of Indiana. He held this post from 1822 until 1825 when he resigned to become a U.S. Senator. Hendricks served in the U.S. Senate from 1825 to 1837. After failing to win reelection, he returned to the practice of law in Madison, Indiana. Hendricks also served on the Board of Trustees for Indiana University (1829-1840). He died on May 16, 1850. Source: Biographical Directory of the United States Congress. United States Congress. 3 Feb. 2006. <http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=H000494>. Scope and Content Note: The majority of the collection consists of letters written by Hendricks. His primary correspondents were N. D. Gallion, a lawyer in Brookville, Indiana, and William Gallion. There are also letters from Hendricks to Presidents Jackson and Polk.
  • Indiana Law Review Volume 52 2019 Number 1

    Indiana Law Review Volume 52 2019 Number 1

    Indiana Law Review Volume 52 2019 Number 1 SYMPOSIUM HOOSIER BRIDESMAIDS MARGO M. LAMBERT* A. CHRISTOPHER BRYANT** Indiana proudly proclaims itself the “Crossroads of America.”1 While some northeast-corridor cynics might deride the boast as a paraphrase for flyover country, there is no denying the political significance of the Hoosier State’s geographical and cultural centrality. As one of Indiana’s most celebrated historians has observed, “[b]y the beginning of the twentieth century Indiana was often cited as the most typical of American states, perhaps because Hoosiers in this age of transition generally resisted radical change and were able usually to balance moderate change with due attention to the continuities of life and culture.”2 Throughout the Gilded Age, elections in the state were so closely fought that the winning party rarely claimed more than slimmest majority.3 At the time, Indiana tended to favor Republicans over Democrats, but the races were close with Democrats claiming their share of victories.4 During these years, voter turnout remained high in presidential elections, with Indiana ranging from the eightieth to the ninetieth percentiles, no doubt a product of the closeness of the contests. Such voter turnout substantially exceeded that typical of surrounding states.5 Hoosiers liked to politick. The state’s high voter participation may also have been, in some part, attributable to its relaxed voting laws for adult males during the nineteenth * Associate Professor of History, University of Cincinnati Blue Ash College. ** Rufus King Professor of Constitutional Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law. The authors, proud Hoosiers by birth and Buckeyes by professional opportunity, thank first and foremost Brad Boswell for entrusting us with the opportunity to open the March 29, 2018 Symposium.
  • The Savage Allies of the Northwest (Paper Two)

    The Savage Allies of the Northwest (Paper Two)

    50 Indianu fiIaguziize of History The Savage Allies of the Northwest (Paper Two) ANIMALSAND GEOGRAFHICALFEATURES OF THE NORTHWEST DECADENCEOF THE TRIBES By ELMOREBARCE Perhaps no country ever held forth greater allurement to savage huntsmen than the old territory of the northwest. Its rivers and lakes teemed with edible fish; its great forests abounded with deer, elk, bears and raccoons; its vast plains and prairies were filled with herds of buffalo that existed up almost to the close of the eighteenth century; every swamp and morass was filled with countless thousands of geese, ducks, swan and cranes, and rodents like the beaver and other animals furnished the red man with the warmest of raiment in the coldest winter. To give an idea of the vast wealth of this domain in fur-bearing animals alone, it may be taken into account that in the year 1818 the American Fur Company, under the control of John Jacob Astor, with its headquarters at Mackinaw, had in its employ about four hundred clerks and traders, together with about two thousand French-Canadian voyageurs, who roamed all the rivers and lakes of the Indian country from the British dominions on the north, to as far west as the Missouri river.1 The “out- fits” of this company had trading posts on the Illinois, and all its tributaries; on the Muskegon, Grand, Kalamazoo and other rivers in Michigan; on the line of the old Pottawatomi trail from the Wabash country to Post Chicago, and in the neighborhood of the Beaver lake regions in northern Indi- ana, and at many other points.
  • Biographies 1169

    Biographies 1169

    Biographies 1169 also engaged in agricultural pursuits; during the First World at Chapel Hill in 1887; studied law; was admitted to the War served as a second lieutenant in the Three Hundred bar in 1888 and commenced practice in Wilkesboro, N.C.; and Thirteenth Trench Mortar Battery, Eighty-eighth Divi- chairman of the Wilkes County Democratic executive com- sion, United States Army, 1917-1919; judge of the municipal mittee 1890-1923; member of the Democratic State executive court of Waterloo, Iowa, 1920-1926; county attorney of Black committee 1890-1923; mayor of Wilkesboro 1894-1896; rep- Hawk County, Iowa, 1929-1934; elected as a Republican to resented North Carolina at the centennial of Washington’s the Seventy-fourth and to the six succeeding Congresses inauguration in New York in 1889; unsuccessful candidate (January 3, 1935-January 3, 1949); unsuccessful candidate for election in 1896 to the Fifty-fifth Congress; elected as for renomination in 1948 to the Eighty-first Congress; mem- a Democrat to the Sixtieth Congress (March 4, 1907-March ber of the Federal Trade Commission, 1953-1959, serving 3, 1909); unsuccessful candidate for reelection in 1908 to as chairman 1955-1959; retired to Waterloo, Iowa, where the Sixty-first Congress; resumed the practice of law in he died July 5, 1972; interment in Memorial Park Cemetery. North Wilkesboro, N.C.; died in Statesville, N.C., November 22, 1923; interment in the St. Paul’s Episcopal Churchyard, Wilkesboro, N.C. H HACKETT, Thomas C., a Representative from Georgia; HABERSHAM, John (brother of Joseph Habersham and born in Georgia, birth date unknown; attended the common uncle of Richard Wylly Habersham), a Delegate from Geor- schools; solicitor general of the Cherokee circuit, 1841-1843; gia; born at ‘‘Beverly,’’ near Savannah, Ga., December 23, served in the State senate in 1845; elected as a Democrat 1754; completed preparatory studies and later attended to the Thirty-first Congress (March 4, 1849-March 3, 1851); Princeton College; engaged in mercantile pursuits; served died in Marietta, Ga., October 8, 1851.
  • 1780 Hendrick Chronology

    1780 Hendrick Chronology

    1780-1789 Records -----1780 Revolutionary War: Moses Hendrick entered Service from Bedford County, Virginia, where he then resided. Served in militia. Pensioned in 1833 as a resident of Russellville, Logan County, Kentucky, where he died 22 Jan 1849. Married 12 Mar 1796 to Nelly Overby in Lunenburg County, Virginia. Widow, age 76 of Russellville, Kentucky, granted pension in 1849; granted Bounty Land warrant #5078 in 1855. (F-W2545, R1253) Moses Hendrick was born Jan. 25, 1765: place not stated, name of parents not given. While a resident of Bedford County, Virginia he enlisted in 1780, served 6 months as a private in Capt Thomas Arthur's Co., Col. Charles Lynch's Virginia regiment. Was in battle of Long Bridge, near Portsmouth, and in three skirmishes and returned home; shortly afterwards, he enlisted and served six months as private in Capt. John Child's co., Col. Merriwether's and Charles Lynch's Virginia regiment, during which period he marched to Guilford Court House, where he received a slight musket ball wound in his left leg. He enlisted again in 1781, and served 3 months as a private in Capt. John Trigg's company., during which he was in the Siege of Yorktown, and at the surrender of Cornwallis. He returned to Bedford County, Virginia and in 1784, enlisted and served six months as private in Capt. Jesse Butt's co., Col. Anthony Street's Virginia Regt., during which he marched from Winchester to Pittsburg. He was allowed pension on his application executed 4 Mar 1833, at which time he resided in Russellville, Logan Co., Kentucky.