DOCSLIB.ORG

General Assembly Distr.: General 21 June 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Assembly Distr.: General 21 June 2021 United Nations A/HRC/47/NGO/178 General Assembly Distr.: General 21 June 2021 English only Human Rights Council Forty-seventh session 21 June–9 July 2021 Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Written statement* submitted by Coordination des Associations et des Particuliers pour la Liberté de Conscience, a non-governmental organization in special consultative status The Secretary-General has received the following written statement which is circulated in accordance with Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31. [31 May 2021] * Issued as received, in the language(s) of submission only. GE.21-08322(E) A/HRC/47/NGO/178 State Funding of anti-religious associations in France CAP Freedom of Conscience is a secular European NGO with United Nations Consultative Status, created in 1995 and dedicated to protecting the Right of Freedom of Religion and Belief. It combats all forms of discrimination based on religion or belief, inter alia, by alerting European and International bodies to abuses and violations of international standards. It collects testimonies of discrimination and human rights violations affecting religious or belief communities disseminating them to international bodies, to broadly raise awareness on the subject and to generate debate on the need for protection of freedom of religion or Belief. CAP Freedom of Conscience also advocates for any religious or spiritual group facing discrimination and supports the right to have their freedom of religion or belief recognized. CAP Liberté de Conscience is concerned about the relaunch of the fight against religious minorities in France since the recent reorganization of MIVILUDES (the Interministerial Mission of Vigilance and Fight Against Cultic Deviances) has been implemented. At the beginning of 2020, the French Prime Minister announced a reorganization of MIVILUDES in response to a report from the Accounting Court (Cour des Comptes) which denounced the lack of professionalism of MIVILUDES in its working method and questioned the relevance of such an organization. At that time, the Prime Minister said that the work of MIVILUDES would be reoriented towards the fight against radicalism and that it would report to the Interior Ministry. Consequenty, following the advice of the Cour des Comptes, the MIVILUDES was moved from the Prime Minister office, and became a section of the Ministry of Interior. The Minister Delegate for Citizenship at the Ministry of the Interior, Marlène Schiappa, then announced that she was in charge of MIVILUDES. On April 6, she stated that the MIVILUDES was going to be revived and she decided to increase its present budget ten- fold, to 1 million euro per year, and that this million will be allocated to initiatives that would be run by anti-cult associations, namely CCMM and UNADFI.1 CCMM and UNADFI are two French associations, which pretend to be NGOs while in fact they are GONGOs (Government Non-Government Organisations), being 90% funded by the French government. Both groups have been integrated in the newly appointed Orientation Committee of the MIVILUDES. Their main activity is to make derogatory comments (under the guise of ‘information’) against religious minorities and spread propaganda aimed at discrediting and cast shame on such minorities. CCMM and UNADFI are both part of the FECRIS (European Federation of Centres of Research and Information on Cults and Sects), a European umbrella association. In fact, UNADFI is the main founder of FECRIS, the latter being registered in France and also directly funded by the French government. FECRIS, its affiliated organizations and their leaders, have been convicted multiple times by various courts. The former vice-president of FECRIS and Board Member of Austrian FECRIS group GSK has been convicted for defamation a number of times against the religious group Norweger (Christian group present in over 60 countries). Other examples include: AIS/PRO Juventud – Spanish FECRIS group, used the technique of “deprogramming” (a technique that usually involves kidnapping an individual, keeping that individual against his or her will whilst enforcing the person to listen to negative statements about their group until the person recants his/her faith). In 1999, in a judgement issued by the European Court of Human Rights (case Nr 37680/97, Ribera Blume and others versus Spain concerning a deprogramming case) the Court stated that the FECRIS group AIS/Pro Juventud had a 1 https://www.interieur.gouv.fr/Actualites/L-actu-du-Ministere/Marlene-Schiappa-renforce-les- moyens-alloues-a-la-lutte-contre-les-derives-sectaires-1-million-d-euros. 2 A/HRC/47/NGO/178 “direct and immediate responsibility for … the applicants … loss of liberty”and ruled that the Spanish State violated the European Convention on Human Rights for supporting such kidnapping. In 1990, two members of SADK – a Swiss FECRIS member group sentenced to prison in connection with a violent deprogramming attempt on a member of the Hare Krishna movement. Mr. Rossi, who at the time was the spokesman for SADK spoke out loudly in favour of the deprogramming, in which the victim had been subdued with tear gas, saying “We support and approve the deed.” In a final judgement on 19th December 2001 by the Munich State Court, the founder of Sect-info Essen – German FECRIS group was ordered to stop telling or spreading a wide variety of falsehoods about Takar Singh (an Eastern religious group) otherwise they would be fined up to 500,000 DM and if not paid, would be sentenced to jail for up to 6 months. UNADFI and its members (ADFIs) also had their share of convictions. On 15 January 1997, the Douai Court of Appeal convicted the president of ADFI Nord, for defamation regarding the Cultural Association of the Jehovah’s Witnesses in France. On 29 March 2002, the Marseille Criminal Court condemned a well-known member of UNADFI and FECRIS, for defamation regarding the association of Jehovah’s Witnesses. On 20 November 2001, the Paris Criminal Court condemned the president of UNADFI, for public defamation regarding a member of the Church of Scientology. On 5 February 2003, the Paris Court of Appeal confirmed this judgment. In November 2015, UNADFI was convicted by the Court of Appeal of Paris for “abuse of legal process”, for having joined, and persisted unlawfully and in bad faith as a plaintiff against the Church, while UNADFI knew perfectly well that this action was inadmissible, its sole purpose being to "harm the Church and to illegally influence the judicial proceedings in progress.” This conviction was upheld by the Court of Cassation on January 12, 2017. Moreover in 2020, FECRIS has been described by USCIRF (United States Commission on International Religious Freedom), a bipartisan U.S. federal government commission created by the 1998 International Religious Freedom Act, as a group regularly spreading negative propaganda about religious minorities that needed to be countered. In a very well documented report entitled The Anti-cult Movement and Religious Regulation in Russia and the Former Soviet Union,2 USCIRF also described how Alexander Dvorkin, a Russian Orthodox anticult activist and Vice-President of FECRIS, supported, amongst other things, “rehabilitation centres that claim to successfully deprogram ‘victims’ through a combination of psychological, theological, and pedagogical methodologies.” Such "victims” are in fact members of religious minorities that they conside “destructive” “pseudo-religions.” In its report, USCIRF wrote that, “the anti-cult movement continues to conduct a highly effective disinformation campaign against religious minorities with devastating consequences for their human rights (…) The anti-cult movement is fundamentally a propaganda outlet conducting a highly effective information war against religious minorities throughout Russia and many of the countries in which it retains influence.” It finally recommends to, “counter propaganda against new religious movements by the European Federation of Research and Information Centers on Sectarianism (FECRIS) (…) with information about the ongoing involvement of individuals and entities within the anti- cult movement in the suppression of religious freedom.” On March 27, 1992, the Federal Supreme Administrative Court of Germany found that for a government agency to fund a private association, which was used by the State in order to warn the general public against the activities of certain religious or philosophical 2 https://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/2020%20Anti-Cult%20Update%20- %20Religious%20Regulation%20in%210Russia.pdf. 3 A/HRC/47/NGO/178 movements and which used its freedom of speech to express “malicious criticism”, was a violation of its constitutional obligation for neutrality, as well as an infringement of the plaintiff’ rights - a new religious and philosophical movement.3 Such a decision should inform the French government when it comes to funding associations that have been engaged in religious discrimination and the spreading of malicious propaganda for decades. Lately, on 27 November 2020, the District Court of Hamburg, Germany, ruled against FECRIS and ordered that it should erase from its website and refrain in the future from making defamatory and accusatory statements on the Jehovah’s Witnesses of Germany, under the penalty of fines or detention. The condemned statements by FECRIS were as serious as accusing the Jehovah’s Witnesses of stealing property and causing the deaths of numerous adults and children, as well as using female Witnesses as “women slaves”. These statements were found to be untrue by the Court which gave an injunctive order to FECRIS to stop spreading such rumors. Recommendation: States should stop funding FECRIS and its anti-cult associations and in particular, France should exclude them from the Advisory Council of the Government Agency MIVILUDES. 3 German Supreme Administrative Court, 27 March 1992, # 7C21-90LU66, The Federal Republic of Germany v. Dörfchen Rajneesh Meditationszentrum. 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Israeli Center for Victims of Cults Who Is Who? Who Is Behind It?
    Human Rights Without Frontiers Int’l Avenue d’Auderghem 61/16, 1040 Brussels Phone/Fax: 32 2 3456145 Email: [email protected] – Website: http://www.hrwf.eu No Entreprise: 0473.809.960 The Israeli Center for Victims of Cults Who is Who? Who is Behind it? By Willy Fautré The Israeli Center for Victims of Cults About the so-called experts of the Israeli Center for Victims of Cults and Yad L'Achim Rami Feller ICVC Directors Some Other So-called Experts Some Dangerous Liaisons of the Israeli Center for Victims of Cults Conclusions Annexes Brussels, 1 September 2018 The Israeli Center for Victims of Cults Who is Who? Who is Behind it? The Israeli Center for Victims of Cults (ICVC) is well-known in Israel for its activities against a number of religious and spiritual movements that are depicted as harmful and dangerous. Over the years, the ICVC has managed to garner easy access to the media and Israeli government due to its moral panic narratives and campaign for an anti-cult law. It is therefore not surprising that the ICVC has also emerged in Europe, in particular, on the website of FECRIS (European Federation of Centers of Research and Information on Cults and Sects), as its Israel correspondent.1 For many years, FECRIS has been heavily criticized by international human rights organizations for fomenting social hostility and hate speech towards non-mainstream religions and worldviews, usually of foreign origin, and for stigmatizing members of these groups.2 Religious studies scholars and the scientific establishment in general have also denounced FECRIS for the lack of expertise of their so-called “cult experts”.
    [Show full text]
  • Endc Proceedings 12/2009
    ENDC PROCEEDINGS 12/2009 ■ ENGLISH SUMMARIES 3 ESTONIAN NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE CULTURAL, PEACE AND CONFLICT STUDIES SERIES ■ SERIES EDITORS: ANDRES SAUMETS AND ALAR KILP VOLUME 1: RELIGION AND POLITICS IN MULTICULTURAL EUROPE: PERSPECTIVES AND CHALLENGES Alar Kilp and Andres Saumets Proceedings 12/2009 EXECUTIVE EDITOR: Andres Saumets (Estonia) EDITORIAL BOARD: Ken Kalling (Estonia) Alar Kilp (Estonia) Peeter Kukk (Estonia) Rain Liivoja (Finland) Enno Mõts (Estonia) Erik Männik (Estonia) Andreas Pawlas (Germany) Claus Freiherr von Rosen (Germany) Volker Stümke (Germany) LANGUAGE EDITORS: Reet Hendrikson (Estonia) Karen Kuldnokk (Estonia) Epp Leete (Estonia) Roy Lowthian (United Kingdom) EDITORIAL COUNCIL: Aarne Ermus (Estonia) Wilfried Gerhard (Germany) Rudolf Hamann (Germany) Jakob Kübarsepp (Estonia) Ants Laaneots (Estonia) Raul Mälk (Estonia) Ago Pajur (Estonia) Eric Allan Sibul (USA) Villu Tamul (Estonia) Peeter Tulviste (Estonia) Matti Turtola (Finland) ISSN 1736–0242 ISBN 978–9985–9513–7–8 Copyright: Estonian National Defence College, 2009 Tartu University Press www.tyk.ee CONTENTS ■ FOREWORD ............................................................................................ 9 RELIGION AND POLITICS IN MULTICULTURAL EUROPE Alar Kilp and Andres Saumets ................................................................ 13 1. Theoretical Considerations .................................................................. 18 1.1. Culture .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • From the Jehovah's Witnesses to Scientology and Beyond
    $ The Journal of CESNUR $ Research Notes Scientology, Anti-Cultists, and the State in Russia and Hungary On October 5–6, 2017, Vytautas Magnus University in Kaunas, Lithuania, hosted the conference Religion(s) and Power(s), organized by the the Lithuanian Society for the Study of Religions in co-operation with the Estonian Society for the Study of Religions and the Latvian Society for the Study of Religion. We publish the texts of the session “‘Cults,’ Anti-Cultists, and Power in Russia. Anti-Extremism Laws and the Case of the Church of Scientology.” To document how Russian concepts of “spiritual security” are being exported in other countries, we also include a paper on Hungary by Patricia Duval, from the seminar Religion and Civil Society in the Post-Soviet Era: Central Asia and Beyond, co-organized by CESNUR at the American University of Central Asia, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, on March 19–20, 2018. The Social Construction of “Extremism” in Russia: From the Jehovah’s Witnesses to Scientology and Beyond Massimo Introvigne Center for Studies on New Religions [email protected] ABSTRACT: After the 2017 “liquidation” of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, Russia moved to liquidate other new religious movements, including the Church of Scientology. While international criticism often focused on the Russian anti-proselytization laws of 2016, it was in fact the anti-extremism law of 2002, as amended in 2006, that became the main tool for “liquidating” unpopular minorities. In the Russian context, the local anti-cult movement led by Alexander Dvorkin and by radical sectors of the Orthodox Church, accredited itself as the custodian of the nationalist doctrine of “spiritual security,” aimed at shielding Russian from “foreign” spiritual and cultural influences.
    [Show full text]
  • The French-Russian Orthodox Connection
    Human Rights Without Frontiers Int’l Avenue d’Auderghem 61/16, 1040 Brussels Phone/Fax: 32 2 3456145 Email: [email protected] – Website: http://www.hrwf.eu OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting Warsaw, Tuesday 12 September 2017 Side-event Antisect movements and Laïcité: The French-Russian Orthodox Connection About FECRIS member association in Russia: St. Irenaeus of Lyons Religious Studies Research Centre The Saint Irenaeus of Lyons Centre for Religious Studies, which is FECRIS member association in Russia, was founded in 1993 with the blessing of the Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia Alexy II. The Centre is also a missionary faculty department of St Tikhon's Orthodox University in Moscow the objective of which is “to spread credible information on doctrines and activities of totalitarian sects and destructive cults”. Since then, A.L. Dvorkin has been the president of this Centre affiliated to the Russian Orthodox Church. The Saint Irenaeus of Lyons Centre for Religious Studies is the head centre of the Russian Association of Centres for Religious and Sectarian Studies (RATsIRS). The president of RATsIRS is also A.L. Dvorkin; the vice-presidents are Archpriest Alexander Novopashin and Archpriest Alexander Shabanov; the executive secretary is priest Lev Semenov, Ph.D., associate professor. Apart from the Saint Irenaeus of Lyons Centre, there is a global network of so-called "parents’ initiatives" and other similar organizations in Russia the majority of which have become members of RATsIRS in Russia (some are missionary departments of Orthodox dioceses). There are also a number of so-called “rehabilitation centres” which aim at reconverting followers of “non-traditional religions” to Orthodoxy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of FECRIS and Anti-Cult Organizations in Russia
    The Role of FECRIS and Anti-Cult Organizations in Russia This contribution concerns the role played by anti-cult organizations in Russia in the repression of religious minorities, and in particular the members of FECRIS, the European Federation of Centres of Research and Information on Sectarianism. In order to understand how and when the anti-cult movement came into play, we should briefly discuss the background of religious unrest in Russia. The concept of “Spiritual Security” – Background In October 1990, a Law on Freedom of Religion was adopted under the Gorbachev regime, which was one of the last and most decisive liberalizing legislative reforms introduced in the old Soviet system. For the first time in Russian history, practicing religion was declared "the unalienable right of Russian citizens". This right also applied to all those residing in Russia, irrespective of their citizenship. The law maintained strict separation between Church and State, provided State ideological neutrality and guaranteed equal rights for all faiths, regardless of their origins and size. As an immediate consequence of the Law, Russia's religious landscape started to be deeply modified. There was resurgence of the Russian Orthodox Church and other “traditional” religions, Muslim, Catholic, Jewish and Buddhist and their missionary activities from abroad, as well as proselytizing efforts of religions that were new to Russia. This evolution gave rise to a strong anti-cult movement, focused in the Moscow Patriarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church, which started to push the concept that Russia’s “spiritual security” and traditional values were somehow at risk. In November 1996, then Orthodox Bishop Kirill, who was subsequently elected in 2009 as the Patriarch of Moscow and all Russia, publicly spoke about the problem of proselytism facing the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC).
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 4, Issue 6 November—December 2020
    The Journal of CESNUR $ Volume 4, Issue 6 November—December 2020 $ The Journal of CESNUR $ Director-in-Charge | Direttore responsabile Marco Respinti Editor-in-Chief | Direttore Massimo Introvigne Center for Studies on New Religions, Turin, Italy Associate Editor | Vicedirettore PierLuigi Zoccatelli Pontifical Salesian University, Turin, Italy Editorial Board / International Consultants Milda Ališauskienė Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania Eileen Barker London School of Economics, London, United Kingdom Luigi Berzano University of Turin, Turin, Italy Antoine Faivre École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris, France Holly Folk Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington, USA Liselotte Frisk (†) Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden J. Gordon Melton Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA Susan Palmer McGill University, Montreal, Canada Stefania Palmisano University of Turin, Turin, Italy Bernadette Rigal-Cellard Université Bordeaux Montaigne, Bordeaux, France Instructions for Authors and submission guidelines can be found on our website at www.cesnur.net. ISSN: 2532-2990 The Journal of CESNUR is published bi-monthly by CESNUR (Center for Studies on New Religions), Via Confienza 19, 10121 Torino, Italy. $ The Journal of CESNUR $ Volume 4, Issue 6, November—December 2020 Contents Articles 3 An Introduction: Scapegoating the Jehovah’s Witnesses to Maintain the Cohesion of National Communities Bernadette Rigal-Cellard 11 Opposition to Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia: The Cultural Roots Rosita Šorytė 25 Opposition to Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia: The Anti-Cult Context. The Role of Anti-Cult Myths About Jehovah’s Witnesses in the Increasing Persecution of This Denomination in the Russian Federation Sergey Ivanenko 41 Opposition to Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia: Legal Measures Willy Fautré 58 The Rights of the Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia and Beyond: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights James T.
    [Show full text]
  • FECRIS Russian Branch Behind the Persecution of Non- Orthodox Minorities in Russia
    FECRIS Russian branch behind the persecution of non- Orthodox minorities in Russia For years, the French anti-sect umbrella organization has been funded – almost entirely – by the French government which, under the principle of laïcité, is supposed to be neutral in religious matters • The concept of ‘spiritual security’ • Extremism without violence • The Russian Orthodox Church hailed the ban of Jehovah’s Witnesses • FECRIS member association in Russia: St. Irenaeus of Lyons Religious Studies Research Centre • FECRIS involvement in the hate campaign against religious minorities in Russia • French laïcité betrayed • Conclusions HRWF (12.06.2017) - “The persecution of non-Orthodox minorities of foreign origin, or without a ‘historical’ presence in Russia, is based on the philosophy of ‘spiritual security’ which is promoted by the Kremlin, the Russian Orthodox Church and the Russian branch of the France-based European Federation of Research and Information Centers on Sectarianism (FECRIS),” declared French attorney Patricia Duval at a conference on religious freedom in Russia co-organized by MEP Hannu Takkula (Finland, ALDE) and Human Rights Without Frontiers on 6 June at the European Parliament in Brussels. The concept of ‘spiritual security’ In the 2000 National Security Concept, the Putin Administration stated: “Assurance of the Russian Federation’s national security also includes protecting the cultural and spiritual-moral legacy and the historical traditions and standards of public life, and preserving the cultural heritage of all Russia’s peoples. There must be a state policy to maintain the population’s spiritual and moral welfare, prohibit the use of airtime to promote violence or base instincts, and counter the adverse impact of foreign religious organizations and missionaries.” This spiritual understanding of national security began with the adoption of the Russian federal law on security in March 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Osce Human Dimension Implementation Meeting
    2007 OSCE HUMAN DIMENSION IMPLEMENTATION MEETING Provisional LIST OF PARTICIPANTS The List of Participants is based on registration sent to the ODIHR. Please submit any corrections/comments to the ODIHR Secretariat, Sofitel Victoria htl by 4 October 2007, 2:00 p.m. ([email protected]) Please note that any corrections provided later than 4 October 2007, 2:00 p.m. will NOT be included in the final list of participants Warsaw, 24 September – 5 October 2007 OSCE Delegations/Partners for Co-operation ALBANIA Amb. Florent CELIKU Embassy of the Republic of Albania Head of Delegation ul. Altowa 1; 02-386 Warsaw; Poland E-mail: [email protected] Tel: +48-22-824 14 27 Mr. Bledar BELJA State Committee for Minorities Member Bul. " Zog I", pll 57; Tirana; Albania E-mail: [email protected] Tel: +355-68-208 52 25 Mr. Genti BENDO Embassy of the Republic of Albania Counsellor ul. Altowa 1; 02-386 Warsaw; Poland E-mail: [email protected] Tel: +48-22-824 14 27 GERMANY Dr. Axel BERG Permanent Mission of the Federal Republic of Germany to Head of Delegation / Ambassador the OSCE E-mail: [email protected] Metternichgasse 3; 1030 Vienna; Austria Tel: +43-1-711 54 0 Fax: +43-1-711 54 268 Web site: http://www.osze.diplo.de Mrs. Margit HELLWIG-BOETTE Federal Foreign Office First Counsellor, Head of OSCE and CoE Division Auswaertiges Amt, Section 203; Werderscher Markt 1; D- E-mail: [email protected] 10117 Berlin; Germany Tel: +49-30-50 00 28 24 Fax: +49-30-50 00 52 824 Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Opposition to Jehovah's Witnesses In
    $ The Journal of CESNUR $ Opposition to Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia: Legal Measures Willy Fautré Human Rights Without Frontiers (HRWF) [email protected] ABSTRACT: Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia have faced increasing hostility from the state and the Russian Orthodox Church since the late 1990s, as legislation designed to safeguard the country against violent extremist ideologies and terrorism has instead been instrumentalized to persecute peaceful “non-traditional” religious minorities. For years, Jehovah’s Witnesses have been stigmatized and cast as a threat to the Russian national and religious identity. Now, controversial legislative changes have allowed for Jehovah’s Witnesses to be labelled “extremist” and formally prosecuted on the grounds of amended anti-extremism laws. This paper highlights how Putin’s political concept of “spiritual security” has driven the legal dynamic leading to the criminalization of the legitimate exercise of the right to religious practices over the last 20 years. It exposes the common agenda of the Russian Orthodox Church, the Russian anti-cult movement led by Alexander Dvorkin, and the Russian government, aimed at the elimination of Jehovah’s Witnesses and other religious minorities. It analyses the successive laws adopted to this end by the Russian Parliament after immense pressure from these actors. It documents the alarming escalation of human rights violations against Jehovah’s Witnesses, which include arrests, administrative fines, pretrial detention, and prison sentences, as well as a legal ban and seizures of all their property. It concludes with some encouraging signs of advocacy from the US government, and some faith in the capacity of Jehovah’s Witnesses to survive this repression.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Cult Wars in Europe: FECRIS, Alexander Dvorkin and Others. the Case of the Applied Sciences Association in Odessa
    $ The Journal of CESNUR $ Anti-Cult Wars in Europe: FECRIS, Alexander Dvorkin and Others. The Case of the Applied Sciences Association in Odessa Willy Fautré Human Rights Without Frontiers [email protected] ABSTRACT: For 25 years, the European Federation of Centers of Research and Information on Sectarianism (FECRIS) has been fueling social hostility against spiritual minorities and new religious movements in Europe. FECRIS, which is almost fully funded by the French state, is represented in over 25 European countries. Through its Russian affiliate association, headed by its vice-president Alexander Dvorkin, FECRIS contributes to the persecution of Christian Evangelicals and Pentecostals, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons, Falun Gong practitioners, Hare Krishna devotees, and others throughout the entire former Soviet space. Although the French state is secular, Alexander Dvorkin, the vice-president of a publicly-funded French organization, is an employee of the Russian Orthodox Church. This paper points at this unhealthy alliance and its dramatic consequences. Detailing the case of the Applied Sciences Association in Odessa, this piece summarizes interviews with victims of Dvorkin’s anti-cult organization and analyses the strategies used by Dvorkin to create an imaginary cult and spread artificial panic. KEYWORDS: FECRIS, Alexander Dvorkin, Anti-Cult Movement in Russia, Leopold Szondi, Applied Sciences Association, Oleg Maltsev, Religion in Ukraine. The European Federation of Centers of Research and Information on Sectarianism (FECRIS) In 2016, my organization Human Rights Without Frontiers investigated a group in Odessa, Ukraine, the Applied Sciences Association, which had worked to defend its philosophy and its beliefs against a Moscow-based anti-cult organization close to the Russian Orthodox Church headed by Alexander Dvorkin, vice-president of FECRIS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anti-Cult Ideology and FECRIS: Dangers for Religious Freedom a White Paper
    The Anti-Cult Ideology and FECRIS: Dangers for Religious Freedom A White Paper Luigi Berzano University of Torino, Italy Boris Falikov Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia Willy Fautré Human Rights Without Frontiers, Brussels, Belgium Liudmyla Filipovich Department of Religious Studies, Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences, Kiev, Ukraine Massimo Introvigne Center for Studies on New Religions, Torino, Italy Bernadette Rigal-Cellard University Bordeaux-Montaigne, Bordeaux, France Torino, Italy: Bitter Winter, 2021 1. The Anti-Cult Ideology In 2020, the USCIRF (United States Commission on International Religious Freedom), a bipartisan commission of the U.S. federal government, identified the anti-cult ideology as a major threat to international religious liberty (USCIRF 2020). The anti-cult ideology, or anti-cultism, is based on the idea that “religions” and “cults” are different. “Cults,” it claims, are not religions, although they may falsely claim to be religious. While religions are joined freely, “victims” join “cults” because of the latter’s coercive practices. International terminology needs a preliminary clarification. The derogatory English word “cult” should not be translated with “culte” in French, and similar words in other languages. As scholars of religion have noticed from decades, the French word having the same derogatory meaning of the English “cult” is “secte,” rather than “culte.” “Cult” should be translated with “secte” in French, and in turn “secte” should be translated with “cult”—not with “sect,” which does not have the same negative meaning (for example, the different mainline Buddhist schools are often referred to in English as “Buddhist sects,” with no negative judgment implied).
    [Show full text]
  • WEBINAR Freedom of Religion from the USCIRF Report On
    WEBINAR Freedom of Religion From the USCIRF Report on Persecutions in Russia to Violations in Europe held on January 29, 2021 The webinar presents and discusses the recent annual USCIRF report, by the Policy Analyst Jason Morton, on the violations of religious freedom worldwide. The report has confirmed the concerns of LIREC, and other NGOs, for the persecution against religious minorities as Jehovah’s Witnesses, in Russia and elsewhere, carried out by some controversial anti-cult organizations. This is a problem that LIREC formerly brought to the attention of OSCE/ODIHR in 2013, when Italy was the object of recommendations due, precisely, to these associations’ legal and media-related activism. On the one hand, the USCIRF Report will hopefully allow for a greater international engagement in support of human rights in those areas; on the other hand, however, some anti-cult organizations like FECRIS (European Federation of Centers for Research and Information on Sectarianism), whose methods and purposes have been censured by the US commission, keep on carrying out its activities undisturbed in Europe. Index RAFFAELLA DI MARZIO, Director of the Center for Studies on Freedom of Religion Belief and Conscience (LIREC) Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 3 LUIGI LACQUANITI, Former Deputy in Italy (2013 to 2017) Greeting address .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]