DOCSLIB.ORG

Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Horwitz, Joshua. Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea. E-book, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.180934. Downloaded on behalf of Unknown Institution GUNS, DEMOCRACY, AND THE INSURRECTIONIST IDEA Horwitz, Joshua. Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea. E-book, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.180934. Downloaded on behalf of Unknown Institution Horwitz, Joshua. Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea. E-book, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.180934. Downloaded on behalf of Unknown Institution GUNS, DEMOCRACY, AND THE INSURRECTIONIST IDEA Joshua Horwitz and Casey Anderson the university of michigan press ann arbor Horwitz, Joshua. Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea. E-book, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.180934. Downloaded on behalf of Unknown Institution Copyright © by the University of Michigan 2009 All rights reserved Published in the United States of America by The University of Michigan Press Manufactured in the United States of America c Printed on acid-free paper 2012 2011 2010 2009 4 3 2 1 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher. A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Horwitz, Joshua, 1963– Guns, democracy, and the insurrectionist idea / Joshua Horwitz and Casey Anderson. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn-13: 978-0-472-11572-3 (cloth : alk. paper) isbn-10: 0-472-11572-3 (cloth : alk. paper) isbn-13: 978-0-472-03370-6 (pbk. : alk. paper) isbn-10: 0-472-03370-0 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Civil rights—United States. 2. Gun control—United States. 3. Firearms—Law and legislation—United States. I. Anderson, Casey, 1968– II. Title. jc599.u5h626 2009 323.4'3—dc22 2009014539 isbn-13: 978-0-472-02199-4 (e-book) Horwitz, Joshua. Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea. E-book, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.180934. Downloaded on behalf of Unknown Institution To our fathers Marshall S. Horwitz (1937–2005) David L. Anderson Horwitz, Joshua. Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea. E-book, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.180934. Downloaded on behalf of Unknown Institution Horwitz, Joshua. Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea. E-book, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.180934. Downloaded on behalf of Unknown Institution ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We want to express our appreciation to Colleen Ramsey Nguyen (for her hard work and attention to detail in assisting with research and copy- editing); the board of directors, staff, and interns of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence and the Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence (for their patience and support with every aspect of our work); our friends and col- leagues at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, in- cluding Steve Teret, Jon Vernick, Daniel Webster, Shannon Frattaroli, Sharon Wake‹eld, Lainie Rutkow, and especially Donna Hesson; our editors at the University of Michigan Press, including Melody Herr and James F. Reische; our family, friends, and colleagues who read drafts or excerpts at various stages, including Ladd Everitt, Sayre Weaver, Mike Beard, Saul Cornell, Carl Bogus, David Hemenway, Garen Wintemute, Jeri Bonavia, Gerald Linderman, Wayne Rohde, Sue LaLumia, Dennis Quinn, and Bruce Horwitz; and David Kairys (for leading us to the Uni- versity of Michigan Press). JMH and CBA I extend a special thank you to my wife, Pam, for her loving support; to my daughter, Micayla, for always greeting me with great gusto and af- fection as I emerge from my basement writing den; and to my mother, Susan Horwitz, for her constant encouragement. JMH I am grateful to my parents, David and Linda Anderson, the best editors a boy could ever have. I also want to thank my wife, Mary, and my chil- dren, Kelly and Tyler, for their love and tolerance. CBA Horwitz, Joshua. Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea. E-book, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.180934. Downloaded on behalf of Unknown Institution Horwitz, Joshua. Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea. E-book, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.180934. Downloaded on behalf of Unknown Institution CONTENTS Introduction 1 part 1. the insurrectionists chapter 1. What Is the Insurrectionist Idea? 13 chapter 2. What Is the Insurrectionist Agenda? 29 chapter 3. Who Are the Insurrectionists? 35 The NRA 35 Allied Gun Groups 46 The Gun Show Circuit 50 The Gun Rights Grassroots and the Blogosphere 55 Liberal Law Professors and D.C. v. Heller 64 Dissenters and Enforcement of the Insurrectionist Orthodoxy 71 part 2. history according to the insurrectionists chapter 4. The Founding 79 Guns and the Revolution 82 The Articles of Confederation 91 The Constitution 96 The Founders and Insurrection 110 chapter 5. The Civil War and Reconstruction 118 The Civil War 118 Reconstruction and “Redemption” 121 Horwitz, Joshua. Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea. E-book, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.180934. Downloaded on behalf of Unknown Institution chapter 6. The Rise of the Third Reich 137 German Gun Laws and the Holocaust 137 Gun Control and the Nazis 139 A Dangerously Weak State 142 Overwhelming Private Violence 148 Democracies and Genocide 155 part 3. insurrectionism, democracy, and freedom chapter 7. The Meaning of Freedom 159 chapter 8. One Gun, One Vote? 163 chapter 9. Democracy and the Monopoly on Force 171 chapter 10. Insurrectionism and Individual Rights 185 Property Rights and Guns at Work 186 The Right of Redress and Immunity for the Firearm Industry 195 Due Process and “Shoot First” Laws 208 chapter 11. Effective Democratic Institutions 215 Conclusion 221 Notes 229 Bibliography 251 Index 261 Horwitz, Joshua. Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea. E-book, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.180934. Downloaded on behalf of Unknown Institution INTRODUCTION The National Ri›e Association (NRA) sells everything from its political agenda to its merchandise with a simple equation: more guns equals more freedom. The NRA steadfastly maintains that thirty thousand gun- related deaths and three hundred thousand assaults with ‹rearms in the United States every year are a small price to pay to guarantee freedom. As former NRA president Charlton Heston put it, “Freedom isn’t free.” When Heston told fellow NRA members that anyone who wanted to take his guns would have to pry them out of his “cold dead hands,” he was advancing a theory of the relationship between freedom and ‹rearms that has become a powerful political and social force in America. When gun enthusiasts talk about the importance of an expansive reading of the Second Amendment to the defense of freedom, they are referring to freedom in a general sense, but they also have something more speci‹c in mind—freedom from government oppression. In their view, unfettered access to ‹rearms is the key ingredient in protecting individual rights from overreaching by government. They argue that the best way—in fact, the only way—to keep centralized authority in check is to ensure that individual citizens retain the capability to confront the government with force of arms. This idea, which we call Insurrectionism, is part of a broader ideo- logical perspective that opposes a strong, activist government in nearly Horwitz, Joshua. Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea. E-book, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.180934. Downloaded on behalf of Unknown Institution 2 guns, democracy, and the insurrectionist idea all of its forms. For Insurrectionists, guns are both symbols and tools of freedom. The idea that individuals must be prepared for a violent con- frontation with the state is only one tenet, albeit crucial, of a worldview that is hostile toward—or at least highly suspicious of—public educa- tion, immigration, international institutions, and almost any type of social program, especially when run by the federal government. Antigovernment sentiment is, of course, not con‹ned to gun rights en- thusiasts, but the Insurrectionist idea adds an emotionally charged ele- ment to the standard conservative critique: big government is not just inef‹cient or even corrupt but is an alien force that threatens to annihi- late us if we fail to exercise constant vigilance against its natural ten- dency toward tyranny. On occasion, the Insurrectionist idea spurs a lost soul or desperate tax delinquent or publicity-seeking paramilitarist to violent action. Timothy McVeigh was the poster child for the deadly consequences of taking the Insurrectionist idea to heart, but smaller armed confronta- tions between “citizen” and government are suf‹ciently common that they usually warrant only a brief mention in the local newspaper unless they escalate into full-scale shootouts. Rather than attempting to re- solve their grievances through the courts or the political process, self- declared “patriots” challenge government authority
Recommended publications
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    To Shake Their Guns in the Tyrant's Face: Libertarian Political Violence and the Origins of the Militia Movement Robert H. Churchill http://www.press.umich.edu/titleDetailDesc.do?id=327258 The University of Michigan Press, 2009. introduction On April 29, 1994, twenty-eight men met in the woods of northern Michigan. Angered by the events at Ruby Ridge and Waco and alarmed by rumors of black helicopters and foreign soldiers hidden on American military bases, these men agreed to associate as the ‹rst brigade of the Northern Michigan Regional Militia. The militia was the brainchild of Norm Olson and Ray Southwell, the pastor and deacon of a small Bap- tist church near Alanson, Michigan. Those assembled elected Olson as their commander. He in turn laid down some basic principles under which they would proceed. First, the militia would operate publicly. If they believed that the government was a threat to their liberty, then it was their duty, as patriots and as men, to “shake their guns in the tyrant’s face.”Second, the militia would be open to men and women of principle regardless of race or faith. Olson believed that the government was ut- terly corrupt, but unlike other voices on the far right, he argued that the source of that corruption lay in the human heart and not in any Jewish conspiracy or in the loss of racial purity. Finally, Olson portrayed the militia as an expression of popular sov- ereignty, a reincarnation of the Minutemen who had faced off against the king’s troops at Lexington and Concord.
  • Jones (Stephen) Oklahoma City Bombing Archive, 1798 – 2003 (Bulk 1995 – 1997)

    Jones (Stephen) Oklahoma City Bombing Archive, 1798 – 2003 (Bulk 1995 – 1997)

    JONES (STEPHEN) OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING ARCHIVE, 1798 ± 2003 (BULK 1995 ± 1997). See TARO record at http://www.lib.utexas.edu/taro/utcah/03493/cah-03493.html (Approximately 620 linear feet) This collection is open for research use. Portions are restricted due to privacy concerns. See Archivist's Note for more details. Use of DAT and Beta tapes by appointment only; please contact repository for more information. This collection is stored remotely. Advance notice required for retrieval. Contact repository for retrieval. Cite as: Stephen Jones Oklahoma City Bombing Archive, 1798 ± 2003 (Bulk 1995 ± 1997), Dolph Briscoe Center for American History, University of Texas at Austin. [AR 98-395; 2003-055; 2005-161] ______________________________________________________________________________ BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE: Stephen Jones (born 1940) was appointed in May 1995 by the United States District Court in Oklahoma City to serve as the lead defense attorney for Timothy McVeigh in the criminal court case of United States of America v. Timothy James McVeigh and Terry Lynn Nichols. On April 19, 1995, two years to the day after the infamous Federal Bureau of Investigation and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms raid on the Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas, a homemade bomb delivered inside of a Ryder rental truck was detonated in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Timothy McVeigh, as well as his accomplice Terry Nichols, were accused of and, in 1997, found guilty of the crime, and McVeigh was executed in 2001. Terry Nichols is still serving his sentence of 161 consecutive life terms without the possibility of parole in the ADX Florence super maximum-security prison in Florence, Colorado.
  • Internet and U.S. Citizen Militias. Doctor of Philosophy

    Internet and U.S. Citizen Militias. Doctor of Philosophy

    INTERNET AND U.S. CITIZEN MILITIAS Stan C. Weeber, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2000 APPROVED: Daniel G. Rodeheaver, Major Professor James Williams, Minor Professor James Quinn, Committee Member Mahmoud Sadri, Committee Member Rudy Seward, Committee Member Dale Yeatts, Chair of the Department of Sociology David Hartman, Dean of the School of Community Service C. Neal Tate, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Weeber, Stan C., Internet and U.S. citizen militias. Doctor of Philosophy (Sociology), May, 2000, 108 pp., 17 tables, references, 115 titles. Smelser’s theory of collective behavior holds that people join radical social movements because they experience strain. Among the most serious strains are anxieties that relate to one’s social status and the roles that correspond to it. A social movement arises as a means of coping with these anxieties. Militia presence and activity on the Internet (especially Usenet) is a phenomenon that can be studied within the framework of Smelser’s theory. Militia watchers contend that those who join the militias have experienced the kinds of strain to which Smelser refers. A content analysis of Internet traffic of U.S. militias provides a test of the general thesis outlined above. By analyzing Internet sites it is possible to examine whether militiamen have experienced strain, and whether the strain, together with other factors, influence an individual’s decision to join the militia. This dissertation was the first sociological study of American militias on the Internet and the first in which militias from all regions of the country was studied.
  • Texas Sheriff Perceptions of the Militia Movement

    Texas Sheriff Perceptions of the Militia Movement

    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2016 Texas Sheriff eP rceptions of the Militia Movement John F. Fisher Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Criminology Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, and the Public Policy Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Social and Behavioral Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by John F. Fisher has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Tina Jaeckle, Committee Chairperson, Human Services Faculty Dr. Anne Hacker, Committee Member, Human Services Faculty Dr. Mary Bold, University Reviewer, Human Services Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2016 Abstract Texas Sheriff Perceptions of the Militia Movement by John F. Fisher MA, Sul Ross State University, 2007 MS, Sul Ross State University, 2005 BS, Angelo State University, 2001 Proposal Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Human Services Specializing in Criminal Justice Walden University August 2016 Abstract With the election of President Barack Obama, the United States has seen a steady increase in the number of right-wing militia groups.
  • The Origins of the Militia Movement Robert H

    The Origins of the Militia Movement Robert H

    To Shake Their Guns in the Tyrant's Face: Libertarian Political Violence and the Origins of the Militia Movement Robert H. Churchill http://www.press.umich.edu/titleDetailDesc.do?id=327258 The University of Michigan Press, 2009. the origins of the militia movement: violence and memory on the suburban-rural frontier Sometimes change is sudden, and so dramatic that we can hardly believe our eyes. On November 9, 1989, I came home from teaching high school and turned on the television. I had followed the events in Eastern Europe closely that fall, but it still took me twenty minutes to fathom the live im- ages of young people dancing atop a concrete wall. I simply could not grasp what I was seeing. The newscasters reporting the fall of the Berlin Wall were themselves speechless. Sometimes change is imperceptible, until one day we are forced to confront a new state of affairs and realize that it has been twenty years in the making. I grew up in a variety of communities, urban, suburban, and rural. In one of those rural communities I once attended a Fourth of July celebration in a parking lot in the middle of town. It was a tailgate party attended by most of the town’s high school students, who stood in a small crowd drinking beer, in wholesale violation of the town’s open container laws and the state’s minimum age regulations. At the entrance to the parking lot, about ‹fty yards from the crowd, the town’s chief of police sat in his cruiser.
  • Paranoia, Patriotism, and the Citizen Militia Movement: Constitutional Right Or Criminal Conduct?

    Paranoia, Patriotism, and the Citizen Militia Movement: Constitutional Right Or Criminal Conduct?

    Mercer Law Review Volume 47 Number 2 Articles Edition Article 7 3-1996 Paranoia, Patriotism, and the Citizen Militia Movement: Constitutional Right or Criminal Conduct? R.J. Larizza Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation R.J. Larizza, Paranoia, Patriotism, and the Citizen Militia Movement: Constitutional Right or Criminal Conduct?, 47 Mercer L. Rev. 581 (1996). This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Mercer Law School Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mercer Law Review by an authorized editor of Mercer Law School Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENT Paranoia, Patriotism, and the Citizen Militia Movement: Constitutional Right or Criminal Conduct? I. INTRODUCTION As this country rushes towards the twenty first century, a growing cloud of civil unrest has found its way into the hearts of many Ameri- cans. In a bold move to challenge the power of the federal government, a significant number of American citizens have sought refuge from perceived government injustice by forming citizen militias. These self styled militia groups fear that the liberties guaranteed by the United States Constitution are rapidly evaporating in the wake of a federal government that has grown too large and powerful. For example, while addressing the Senate Subcommittee on terrorism, Norman Olson (Commander of the Michigan Regional Militias) characterized the federal government as the "child of the armed citizen" and stated that "[t]he increasing amount of federal encroachment into our lives indicates the need for parental corrective action."' While Olson and other militia 1.
  • The Creation of a Public Identity For

    The Creation of a Public Identity For

    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts PATRIOTS OR PARANOIDS? THE CREATION OF A PUBLIC IDENTITY FOR THE MODERN MILITIA MOVEMENT A Thesis in Speech Communication By Heather M. Norton Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2005 ii The thesis of Heather M. Norton was reviewed and approved* by the following: J. Michael Hogan Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Thesis Advisor Chair of Committee Thomas W. Benson Professor of Speech Communication Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Rhetoric Stephen H. Browne Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences John D. McCarthy Professor of Sociology James P. Dillard Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Head, Department of Communication Arts and Sciences *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. iii ABSTRACT The Oklahoma City bombing brought the modern Militia Movement to the forefront of the nation’s consciousness. After uncovering accused bomber Timothy McVeigh’s anti-government sentiments and his connections to the Michigan Militia, the federal government and the news media rushed to investigate the dangers posed by this movement—a movement that criticized the government for allegedly seeking to disarm law-abiding Americans and to limit their constitutional rights. The struggle that ensued over the public identity of the militias is the focus of this study. The study investigates the public debate over the militias beginning with the Oklahoma City bombing on April 19, 1995, and ending in 1996, when the militias disappeared from the headlines. Focusing on the “portraits” of the militias produced by the movement’s own leaders, so-called “watchdog” groups, and the Clinton administration, it examines how a variety of advocates worked to shape public perceptions of the movement.
  • The Militia Movement and American History

    The Militia Movement and American History

    Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier History Faculty Publications History 2004 Conversing with the Dead: The Militia Movement and American History Darren Mulloy Wilfrid Laurier University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/hist_faculty Recommended Citation Mulloy, Darren, "Conversing with the Dead: The Militia Movement and American History" (2004). History Faculty Publications. 1. https://scholars.wlu.ca/hist_faculty/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of American Studies, 38 (2004), 3, 439–456 f 2004 Cambridge University Press DOI: 10.1017/S0021875804008734 Printed in the United Kingdom Conversing with the Dead: The Militia Movement and American History DARREN MULLOY If one forgets the past, he will not be prepared for the future. The Militia of Montana YES! TODAY JUST AS YESTERDAY. The Michigan Militia When the militia movement emerged in the United States during the mid 1990s its members were widely seen as simply the latest practitioners of what Richard Hofstadter famously called ‘‘the paranoid style in American politics.’’1 There was much comfort to be had in this characterization. It fitted the militia movement into a long-standing model for understanding right-wing extremism in American life, one in which the principal characteristics of such extremism were readily understood: conspiratorial, Manichean, absolutist – if not apocalyptic – and, of course, paranoid. The problem with this ap- proach, though, is that it tends to discourage any examination of mainstream Darren Mulloy is Assistant Professor of US History at Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada.
  • Origins, Orientations and Etiologies of the Us Citizen Militia Movement

    Origins, Orientations and Etiologies of the Us Citizen Militia Movement

    Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology Volume 27 No. 1, May 1999 57 ORIGINS, ORIENTATIONS AND ETIOLOGIES OF THE U.S. CITIZEN MILITIA MOVEMENT, 1982-1997 Stan C. Weeber, University of North Texas ABSTRACT This paper is a review of what we know about the origins, orientations and etiologies of U.S. citizen militias that formed between 1982 and 1997. Two phases in the evolution of this movement emerge: Phase one (1982-1991) marks the rise and fall of Christian Patriot militias; Phase Two (1992-1997) is characterized by the appearance of Constitutionalist entities. Precursors to Phase One drew heavily upon the classic republican tradition of an unorganized, armed populace. Philosophically these precursors branched out toward both Christian Identity and Constitutionalism. Phase One groups were influenced by the Identity tract The Turner Diaries and by the survivalist Nehemiah Township Charter and Common Law Contract. Phase Two built upon the Constitutionalism of the precursors and was propelled by Pat Robertson's book, a speech by George Bush, and BATF raids at Ruby Ridge and Waco. At its extreme, militia ideology expresses a paranoid view of how the New World Order is preparing for collectivist control. Sociological explanations of militias emphasize the recruitment to activism, how enemies are socially constructed, the paramilitary culture of the postwar U.S., and the role of structural strain. The paper concludes with an exploration of the concepts of hate crime and domestic terrorism as each relates to the U.S. militia phenomenon. INTRODUCTION Montana, whose public appearance marks a On April 21, 1995, Timothy McVeigh was general dissatisfaction with the encroach­ linked by the New York Times to a citizen militia ment of the federal government into the lives in northern Michigan.
  • From the Right

    From the Right

    a special report from the southern poverty law center’s intelligence project TERROR FROM THE RIGHT PLOTS, CONSPIRACIES AND RACIST RAMPAGES SINCE OKLAHOMA CITY terror from the right TERROR FROM THE RIGHT At 9:02 a.m. on April 19, 1995, a 7,000-pound truck bomb, constructed of ammo- nium nitrate fertilizer and nitromethane racing fuel and packed into 13 plastic barrels, ripped through the heart of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. The explosion wrecked much of downtown Oklahoma City and killed 168 people, including 19 children in a day-care center. Another 500 were injured. Although many Americans initially suspected an attack by Middle Eastern radicals, it quickly became clear that the mass murder had actually been carried out by domestic, right-wing terrorists. The slaughter engineered by Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, men steeped in the conspiracy theories and white-hot fury of the American radical right, marked the opening shot in a new kind of domestic political MEDIA AND GENERAL INQUIRIES extremism — a revolutionary ideology whose practitioners do not hesitate Mark Potok or Heidi Beirich to carry out attacks directed at entirely innocent victims, people selected essentially at random to make a political point. After Oklahoma, it was no LAW ENFORCEMENT INQUIRIES longer sufficient for many American right-wing terrorists to strike at a target Joseph Roy Sr., Chief Investigator of political significance — instead, they reached for higher and higher body counts, reasoning that they had to eclipse McVeigh’s attack to win attention. Southern Poverty Law Center 400 Washington Avenue What follows is a detailed listing of major terrorist plots and racist rampages Montgomery, AL 36104 that have emerged from the American radical right in the years since (334) 956-8200 Oklahoma City.
  • The Second Wave Return of the Militias a Special Report from the Southern Poverty Law Center Montgomery, Alabama August 2009 the Second Wave Return of the Militias

    The Second Wave Return of the Militias a Special Report from the Southern Poverty Law Center Montgomery, Alabama August 2009 the Second Wave Return of the Militias

    The Second Wave Return of the Militias A Special Report from the Southern Poverty Law Center Montgomery, Alabama August 2009 The Second Wave Return of the Militias the southern poverty law center is a nonprofit organization that combats hate, intolerance and discrimination through education and litigation. Its Intelligence Project, which prepared this report and also produces the quarterly investigative magazine Intelligence Report, tracks the activities of hate groups and the nativist movement and monitors militia and other extremist anti- government activity. Its Teaching Tolerance project helps foster respect and understanding in the classroom. Its litigation arm files lawsuits against hate groups for the violent acts of their members. MEDIA AND GENERAL INQUIRIES Mark Potok or Heidi Beirich Southern Poverty Law Center 400 Washington Ave., Montgomery, Ala. (334) 956-8200 www.splcenter.org This report was prepared by the staff of the Intelligence Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center. The SPLC is supported entirely by private donations. No government funds are involved. © Southern Poverty Law Center. All rights reserved. southern poverty law center Table of Contents Introduction 4 The Second Wave: Return of the Militias 5 Nativists to ‘Patriots’: Cross-Pollinating the Movement 11 Terror From the Right : 75 Plots and Racist Rampages 13 southern poverty law center Introduction BY MARK POTOK The 1990s saw the rise and fall of the virulently antigovernment “Patriot” movement, made up of para- military militias, tax defiers and so-called “sovereign citizens.” Sparked by a combination of anger at the federal government and the deaths of political dissenters at Ruby Ridge, Idaho, and Waco, Texas, the movement took off in the middle of the decade and continued to grow even after 168 people were left dead by the 1995 bombing of Oklahoma City’s federal build- primary enemy — is headed by a black man.

  • Militia Movement and Second Amendment Revolution: Conjuring with the People David C

    Cornell Law Review Volume 81 Article 2 Issue 4 May 1996 Militia Movement and Second Amendment Revolution: Conjuring with the People David C. Williams Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation David C. Williams, Militia Movement and Second Amendment Revolution: Conjuring with the People , 81 Cornell L. Rev. 879 (1996) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol81/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MILITIA MOVEMENT AND SECOND AMENDMENT REVOLUTION: CONJURING WITH THE PEOPLE David C. Williams4 INTRODUCTION ................................................. 879 I. WHAT THE MILITIA HAS RIGHT-ARMED REVOLUTION .... 886 A. Fear of the Government ............................ 887 B. The Revolutionary Second Amendment ............. 892 C. The Importance of the Militia ...................... 896 D. The Danger of Disarmament ....................... 901 II. WHAT THE MILITIA HAS WRONG--THE BODY OF THE PEOPLE ................................................. 904 A. The Framers' View of the People ................... 904 B. Conjuring with the People .......................... 909 1. Individual Rights Theorists ........................ 911 2. M ilitia Writers ..................................