New Entrants Newsletter Spring 2017
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Is Factory Farming Making Us Sick? IS FACTORY FARMING MAKING US SICK?
Is Factory Farming making us sick? IS FACTORY FARMING MAKING US SICK? A Guide to Animal Diseases and their Impact on Human Health 1 Photo by Engin Akyurt Contents Introduction 4 Avian Influenza (Bird Flu) 6 Bovine TB 8 BSE 10 Campylobacter 12 E. Coli (O157: H7) 14 Foot and Mouth Disease 16 Johne’s Disease 18 Meningitis 20 MRSA 22 Nipah 24 Q Fever 25 Salmonella 26 Swine Flu 28 Other Zoonotic Diseases 30 We can change 32 References 34 2 Is Factory Farming making us sick? 3 Photo by Ethan Kent Introduction The majority of farmed animals in the UK In recent years, animal farming has are reared intensively, inside crowded, filthy brought us outbreaks of BSE, bovine sheds which are the perfect environment TB, foot and mouth, bird flu, swine flu, for bacteria and viruses to flourish. Stressed campylobacter, salmonella and many by their surroundings and their inability more devastating diseases. No wonder to display natural behaviours, forced to the United Nations Food and Agriculture live in their own excrement alongside sick Organization has warned that global and dying animals, it is not surprising that industrial meat production poses a serious farmed animals are vulnerable to infection. threat to human health3. Their immunity is further weakened by the industry breeding from just a few CREATING ANTIBIOTIC high-yielding strains, which has led to genetic erosion. This makes it easier for RESISTANCE disease to sweep swiftly through a group Instead of protecting of animals, who are likely to share near- ourselves by changing identical genetics with little immunological how we treat animals resistance. -
Gaelic Barbarity and Scottish Identity in the Later Middle Ages
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Enlighten MacGregor, Martin (2009) Gaelic barbarity and Scottish identity in the later Middle Ages. In: Broun, Dauvit and MacGregor, Martin(eds.) Mìorun mòr nan Gall, 'The great ill-will of the Lowlander'? Lowland perceptions of the Highlands, medieval and modern. Centre for Scottish and Celtic Studies, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, pp. 7-48. ISBN 978085261820X Copyright © 2009 University of Glasgow A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge Content must not be changed in any way or reproduced in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder(s) When referring to this work, full bibliographic details must be given http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/91508/ Deposited on: 24 February 2014 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk 1 Gaelic Barbarity and Scottish Identity in the Later Middle Ages MARTIN MACGREGOR One point of reasonably clear consensus among Scottish historians during the twentieth century was that a ‘Highland/Lowland divide’ came into being in the second half of the fourteenth century. The terminus post quem and lynchpin of their evidence was the following passage from the beginning of Book II chapter 9 in John of Fordun’s Chronica Gentis Scotorum, which they dated variously from the 1360s to the 1390s:1 The character of the Scots however varies according to the difference in language. For they have two languages, namely the Scottish language (lingua Scotica) and the Teutonic language (lingua Theutonica). -
Healthy Ecosystems East Anglia a Landscape Enterprise Networks Opportunity Analysis
1 Healthy Ecosystems East Anglia A Landscape Enterprise Networks opportunity analysis Making Landscapes work for Business and Society Message LENs: Making landscapes 1 work for business and society This document sets out a new way in which businesses can work together to influence the assets in their local landscape that matter to their bottom line. It’s called the Landscape Enterprise Networks or ‘LENs’ Approach, and has been developed in partnership by BITC, Nestlé and 3Keel. Underpinning the LENs approach is a systematic understanding of businesses’ landscape dependencies. This is based on identifying: LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE FUNCTIONS ASSETS The outcomes that beneficiaries The features and depend on from the landscape in characteristics LANDSCAPE order to be able to operate their in a landscape that underpin BENEFICIARIES businesses. These are a subset the delivery of those functions. Organisations that are of ecosystem services, in that These are like natural capital, dependent on the they are limited to functions in only no value is assigned to landscape. This is the which beneficiaries have them beyond the price ‘market’. sufficient commercial interest to beneficiaries are willing to pay make financial investments in to secure the landscape order to secure them. functions that the Natural Asset underpins. Funded by: It provides a mechanism It moves on from It pulls together coalitions It provides a mechanism Benefits 1 for businesses to start 2 theoretical natural capital 3 of common interest, 4 for ‘next generation’ intervening to landscape- valuations, to identify pooling resources to share diversification in the rural of LENs derived risk in their real-world value propositions the cost of land management economy - especially ‘backyards’; and transactions; interventions; relevant post-Brexit. -
Survey of the Economic Conditions of Crofting 2015-2018
Survey of the Economic Conditions of Crofting 2015 -2018 AGRICULTURE, ENVIRONMENT AND MARINE social research Survey of the Economic Conditions of Crofting 2015 – 2018 Carolyn Black, Chris Martin and Rachel Warren Ipsos MORI December 2018 Contents Key Findings ............................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction and methodology ....................................................................... 4 2. Profile of crofters ............................................................................................. 6 3. Crofting activities .......................................................................................... 11 4. Financial issues in crofting .......................................................................... 16 5. Investments in the croft ................................................................................ 24 6. Sources of information on crofting ............................................................. 29 7. The future of crofting .................................................................................... 32 8. Conclusions ................................................................................................... 36 Appendix A - Questionnaire ................................................................................. 38 Key Findings Building on previous publications, in 2010 and 2014, this report provides a detailed outline of the uses and financial situation of crofts in the years between 2015 -
THE CROFTER for Crofters for Crofting SCF Is Dedicated to Campaigning for Crofters and Fighting for the Future of Crofting
Scottish Crofting Federation THE CROFTER for crofters for crofting SCF is dedicated to campaigning for crofters and fighting for the future of crofting APRIL 2020 Number 120 Crofting law reform HE LAW Society of Scotland (LSS) rural affairs sub-committee has Tselected four crofting law matters which are being considered in detail as part of a project for 2020. Stakeholders identified these matters as ones which would merit reform. The project focuses on the legal aspects, with a view to suggesting specific improvements to existing legislation and influencing © Martin Benson – Tiree © Martin Benson – legislative change. LSS is not undertaking a full review of the law relating to crofting. The consultation sought the views of interested stakeholders on the identified aspects of the law of crofting. LSS invited What is crofting views and experiences of the following matters and any suggestions for legal changes: • croft succession – in particular, circumstances where there is no development? transfer of a tenant’s interest within two years of the date of death; ANY WILL remember that, as part of crofting development. This was such a big topic • the legal status and definition of owner- the 2010 crofting legislation reform, that a sub-group was to be formed. At the time occupier crofter – for example, it is Mthe overseeing of crofting development there was a Crofting Law Stakeholders Group believed that there are around 1000 was taken away from the Crofters Commission convened by Scottish Government and it was felt individuals who own and physically (as it was then) and given to Highlands and that a Crofting Development Stakeholders Group occupy crofts (some pre-1955 Act Islands Enterprise. -
During the Famine Years, 1845-1855 Postgraduate School of Scottish Sıudies September 19.96
'CONTEMPT, SYMPATHY AND ROMANCE' Lowland perceptions of the Highlands and the clearances during the Famine years, 1845-1855 Krisztina Feny6 A thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Glasgow PostgraduateSchool of Scottish Sýudies September19.96 To the Meniog of My Grandparents ABSTRACT This thesis examines Lowland public opinion towards the Highlanders in mid- nineteenth century Scotland. It explores attitudes present in the contemporary newspaper press, and shows that public opinion was divided by three basic perceptions: 'contempt', 'sympathy' and 'romance'. An analysis of the main newspaper files demonstrates that during the Famine years up to the Crimean War, the most prevalent perception was that of contempt, regarding the Gaels as an 'inferior' and often 'useless' race. The study also describes the battle which sympathetic journalists fought against this majority perception, and shows their disillusionment at what they saw at the time was a hopeless struggle. Within the same period, romanticised views are also examined in the light of how the Highlands were increasingly being turned into an aristocratic playground as well as reservation park for tourists, and a theme for pre-'Celtic Twilight' poets and novelists. Through the examination of various attitudes in the press, the thesis also presents the major issues debated in the newspapers relating to the Highlands. It draws attention to the fact that the question of land had already become a point of contention, thirty years before the 1880s land reform movement. The study concludes that in all the three sections of public opinion expressed in the press the Highlanders were seen as essentially a different race from the Lowlanders. -
Understanding the Elements and Adoption of Environmental Best Practice in Horticulture
Understanding the elements and adoption of environmental best practice in horticulture Arthur Andersen Project Number: AH00018 AH00018 This report is published by Horticulture Australia Ltd to pass on information concerning horticultural research and development undertaken for Australian Horticulture. The research contained in this report was funded by Horticulture Australia Ltd with the financial support of all levy paying industries. All expressions of opinion are not to be regarded as expressing the opinion of Horticulture Australia Ltd or any authority of the Australian Government. The Company and the Australian Government accept no responsibility for any of the opinions or the accuracy of the information contained in this report and readers should rely upon their own enquiries in making decisions concerning their own interests. ISBN 0 7341 0459 6 Published and distributed by: Horticultural Australia Ltd Level 1 50 Carrington Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 E-Mail: [email protected] © Copyright 2002 Horticulture Australia Contents Part 1: Executive Summary Part 2: Report Part 3: A guide to implementation Part 4: Appendices • Horticulture Australia ANDERSEN Introduction Understanding the elements and adoption The expected outcomes of the best practice of environmental best practice in study were to: horticulture' is a joint initiative of Horticulture • Gather information on management Australia limited (HAL) and the National practices which help minimise the Land and Water Resources -
Tom Jenkins Dr Kate Pressland
Plant. Grow. Innovate. O C T O B E R 9 T H - O C T O B E R 1 1 T H 2 0 2 0 V I R T U A L E V E N T London office +44 203 2878731 Europe Email address [email protected] South Asia Website www.thpoint0.io United Kingdom Contents I n t r o d u c t io n Introduction 2 From the British Agricultural Revolution of the 18th Programme 3 century to playing a fundamental part in the Green Revolution of the 1960s and 70s, the UK is no stranger Challenges 5 to agricultural innovation in evolving, growing and implementing revolutionary methods to increase productivity, drive efficiency and maximise yields. Challenge AgriTech Innovation 6 With the termination of the EU’s Common Agricultural Challenge Agri BioTech 7 Policy, new agricultural liinitiatives are driving and making it easier for the industry to embrace AgriTech, Challenge Smart Farming to enable innovation, and transform the agriculture, 8 horticulture and forestry sectors. Challenge Soil Productivity 9 There is now, and will continue to be, more opportunities for investment in the excellence of the UK Prizes 10 AgriTech sector to grow new businesses and export overseas. Judges 11 Keynote Speakers 13 Network/Clients 14 Contact Details 15 2 Programme Day 1 - Friday 9th October Day 3 - Sunday 11th October 19:00 - Official Launch 09:00 - Workshop - Pitch Perfect 19:30 - Final Team Formation 10:00 - Mentor Sessions 20:00 - Challenge Brief 12:00 - Final Demos 20:30 - Intro to Judges & Mentors 15:00 - Jury Deliberation 16:00 - Winner Announcement 16:30 - End of Hackathon Day 2 - Saturday 10th October -
Emerging Leaders 2019
Emerging Leaders 2019 Janelle Anderson Scottish Enterprise Rural Leadership Janelle is from a farming family based in Aberdeenshire. Their farming enterprise includes breeding cattle, a small flock of sheep and forestry. Having completed her Batchelor of Technology Degree in Agriculture in 2000, she currently works as Regional Events Manager for the Scottish Association of Young Farmers Clubs based at Thainstone Agricultural Centre and also manages the SAYFC Agri and Rural Affairs Group. Janelle is a director of the Royal Northern Agricultural Society, having been the society President in 2017. She is also past chairman of the North East Farm Management Association (2017/18) and currently secretary of the North East Aberdeen Angus Breeders Club. As well as having a long association with SAYFC as a member, from club to national level, she is also a trustee of John Fotheringham Memorial Trust and Willie Davidson 75th Fund which promotes health and safety amongst young farmers. Since being selected to represent Scotland at the Royal Agricultural Society of the Commonwealth Conference in Calgary in 2006, Janelle has kept a close link to the RASC, attending conferences in New Zealand and Zambia on behalf of the Royal Highland Agricultural Society of Scotland, who hosted the conference in Scotland in 2010 where Janelle was their Next Generation Leader. Janelle is honoured to be attending the Oxford Farming Conference on behalf of the Scottish Enterprise Rural Leaders and is looking forward to meeting the other delegates. James Beary 38-year-old James (Jim) is an upland tenant farmer from the Peak District, producing prime lambs on contract for Tesco. -
PSA Target 3 (Ii) Delivery Plan
CAMPAIGN FOR THE FARMED ENVIRONMENT INTERIM REPORT (JULY to DECEMBER 2011) CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 3 2. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 5 3. PROGRESS AGAINST THE CFE TARGETS ..................................................................... 5 3.1 Participation in AES ...................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Key target option uptake in ELS ................................................................................... 7 3.3 Option uptake in HLS .................................................................................................... 8 3.4 Uptake of ELS buffers ................................................................................................... 8 3.5 Uncropped land ............................................................................................................. 8 3.6 Voluntary management ................................................................................................. 9 3.7 Remaining targets ......................................................................................................... 9 3.8 Changing attitudes and behaviour .............................................................................. 10 4. COMMUNICATIONS ...................................................................................................... -
Understanding the an English Agribusiness Lobby Group
Understanding the NFU an English Agribusiness Lobby Group Ethical Consumer Research Association December 2016 Understanding the NFU - an English Agribusiness Lobby-group ECRA December 2016 1 Contents 1. Introduction – The NFU an English Agribusiness Lobby group 3 2. Economic Lobbying – undermining the smaller farmer 2.1 NFU and farm subsidies – promoting agribusiness at the expense of smaller farmers 11 2.2 NFU and TTIP – favouring free trade at the expense of smaller farms 15 2.3 NFU and supermarkets – siding with retailers and opposing the GCA 17 2.4 NFU and foot and mouth disease – exports prioritised over smaller producers 20 3. Environmental Lobbying – unconcerned about sustainability 3.1 NFU, bees and neonicotinoids – risking it all for a few pence more per acre 24 3.2 NFU and soil erosion – opposing formal protection 28 3.3 NFU and air pollution – opposing EU regulation 31 3.4 NFU, biodiversity and meadows – keeping the regulations away 33 3.5 NFU and Europe – keeping sustainability out of the CAP 41 3/6 NFU and climate change – a mixed response 47 3.7 NFU and flooding – not listening to the experts? 51 4. Animal interventions – keeping protection to a minimum 4.1 Farm animal welfare – favouring the megafarm 53 4.2 NFU, badgers and bovine TB – driving a cull in the face of scientific evidence 60 4.3 The Red Tractor label – keeping standards low 74 5. Social Lobbying – passing costs on to the rest of us 5.1 NFU and Organophosphates in sheep dip – failing to protect farmers’ health 78 5.2 NFU and road safety – opposing regulations 82 5.3 NFU and workers’ rights – opposing the Agricultural Wages Board 86 5.4 NFU and Biotechnology – Supporting GM crops 89 6. -
The Surging Demand For
May 2016 $6.70 Anja and Henry Van Der Vlies The surging demand for Publications Mail AgreementGOAT’S No. 40037298 MILK Publications Mail Agreement No. 40037298 PRODUCTS NITROGEN RATES CORN SMUT MARKET PLANTING STRESS Vol. 18 No. 4 Better Farming May 2016 Cover 10 THE SURGING DEMAND FOR GOAT’S MILK PRODUCTS At a time when bovine milk processing is ‘contracting or remaining steady,’ says one industry insider, ‘the goat milk industry is one of those shining lights that is continuing to grow.’ Features 20 THE BURGEONING MARKET FOR SPECIALTY CROPS Whether it is more established crops like hops, okra and quinoa or still experimental ones such as huitlacoche, a nutritious corn smut fungus, there is a growing demand for these niche products from an increasingly diverse consumer base. 10 22 BIOPESTICIDES BECOMING MORE THAN JUST A NICHE PRODUCT The fastest growing segment of the crop protection market, they offer growers a way to reduce their dependence on chemical pesticides and help them meet increasingly restrictive import and supermarket standards. 30 LIVING WITH THE UPS AND DOWNS 20 OF THE CANADIAN DOLLAR Photo courtesy: University of Guelph Muck Crops Research Station This award-winning Alliston potato producer is cashing in on the efficiencies made when the dollar was higher. 34 CHINESE LONG EGGPLANT OFFERS GOOD RETURNS BUT CARRIES SOME RISK FOR GROWERS With the help of the Vineland Research and Innovation Centre, a handful of Ontario growers are making progress with non-traditional crops like eggplant and okra, but they warn that it’s still too risky to base an entire farm business on them.